Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/A-Rod's 0-for-4

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


A-Rod's 0-for-4

Well, it's my 4th effort and I think it's quite good. How about you? Fist of Judgement 01:54, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

A-Rod's 0-for-4
is being reviewed by
Your Source for Fine Scented Pee
And Whatever Else Comes Out Of Him

Now that the que is empty, we jump all over new pee review requests. ...like starving animals   Le Cejak <-> Mar 27 (09:06)

I STRONGLY suggest that you press that tab at the top of A-Rod's 0-for-4 that says "move" and move it to just A-Rod.   Le Cejak <-> Mar 27 (09:24)
Humour: 2.3 Oh, baseball? I don't know much about baseball except that a ball is included during play. Well, you have to take your readers as they come, I suppose (in other words, you can't choose your readers). Don't be surprised if I don't get it, though... and don't be mad at me! Anyway, avg of all sections...
  • Intro [7]: I didn't laugh or anything, but at least it tricked me into thinking that you're a good writer! It has a very personable style. Even though I don't know any of those people you're mentioning, I bet someone who did would like it. Very good intro for me not knowing what's going on! I almost feel like you should get a higher score for this section, but like I said, you take your readers as they come.
  • 1 A-Rod's First At Bat [7]: Mmm, okay. I understand enough about baseball to at least see why someone would like this part. It's basically saying that he's letting perfectly good pitches go by him, right? ...right?
  • 2 A-Rod's Second At Bat [-]
  • 3 A-Rod's Fielding Error [-]
  • 4 A-Rod's 3rd At Bat [-]
  • 5 A-Rod's 4th At Bat [-]
  • 6 A-Rod Sucks [-]
  • 7 See Also [-]
Prose and formatting:
Final Score: Expression error: Missing operand for +.
Not reviewed yet!
Review now
Personal tools