Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 8

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
20052006 (part 1)2006 (part 2)2007 (part 1)2007 (part 2)2008 (part 1)2008 (part 2)2009 (part 1)2009 (part 2)2010 (part 1)2010 (part 2)2011 (part 1) 2011 (part 2) 2012 (part 1) 2012 (part 2) 2013 2014

edit Writer of the Year

edit Cajek (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +9
  • Nom. Cajek is crazy. Cajek is the craziest loon on this site, and has written more articles this year than Saturn's rings have little pieces of rock. He never writes the same way twice, and has executed some of the wackiest, most hilarious first-person monologues that I've ever read. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Um Downright one of the best people on the site - a great writer and even more a great person who really made this a great place to be. He probably deserves this for that Japanese opera thing alone buuuuuut I can't decide between hiiiim aaaaannddd... --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For per above. --Mnbvcxz 21:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Fuck you TKF for nomming him before me. Cajek has been the living example of an Uncyclopedian writer this entire year, but I don't think we should hold that against him. My mind was made up months ago on this, and he still kept producing quality. -RAHB 03:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • I think WotY is the hardest thing to vote for on Uncyclopedia. Hell, choosing a President wasn't this hard. Cajek is one of my favorite writers on this site. I've seen every aspect of his freakish talent, both on this site and off of it. He's smart. He's talented. Most of all, he's fucking hilarious. Never does the man cease to make me laugh. His wit is that of one you could only find on a site like this. And yet...I'm not voting for Cajek. Every single nominee thus far deserves this award, and yet I can only cast one vote. Cajek, if you decide to come back to Uncyc and read this, know that I love you, buddy. In the butt, that is. Sir SysRq (talk) 03:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • ...shit. SysRq's right, this is a tough choice. Mhaille, Modus, So So, the Cap'n, so many of these guys are amazing writers. This year, though, has belonged to Cajek right from the start. He's consistently hilarious, every time he writes, and despite being on a bit of a hiatus right now, he deserves this. For. - T.L.B. Baloon WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 14:14, Jan 2
  • For As per TKF - Amy Rose 22:43, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • 'For All of his article made me laugh so hard that urine came out my nose. ~ Readmesoon 18:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Cajek is my far one of the most creative, brilliant users I've ever seen on my extremely procrastinative (is that even a word?) life on this site. Oh, and also, literally everything SysRq said I could also say in equal measures. Except the not voting part. 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 11:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. What thekillerfroggy said. --Docile hippopotamus 00:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
  • As much as I'd love to vote for that Mhaille guy, or even MO, or the superslick writing machine that is PP, Cajek has been a busy boy this year. He was one of my nomination for UOTY, the fact that he is still in the running for WOTY as well shows his worth and his talent. For. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  • Symbol for vote For. EVERYONE BOW DOWN!!! --Icons-flag-pi Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 18:34, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

edit TheLedBalloon (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 1
  • Nom. Here's the man whose taught several fantastic writers, including one directly above him, everything he knew, and in the process created talented monsters. Not only is he an incredible writer whose written three of my all-time top five favorite articles, but he has a knack for spreading his love to his dedicated wing of protégés, too. Aside from fantastic writing, the most important characteristic of a fantastic writer is his influence, and TLB's influence is widespread and evident. Plus, he's a fantastic writer. He gets a nod from me. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Speech No. 2: TLB is easily among my favorite writers. I'll admit that I was nervous when he was opped, fearful that perhaps this unstoppable deluge of hilarious articles would subside and eventually dry up, as seems to happen with many good writers that are given bansteeqs. This was not the case with my funny, inflatable friend. Instead, he has mastered both parts of himself, and has become something more. It was an honor writing with him, and through that experience I learned more about just what kind of writer he is: a great writer. I'm not voting for Leddy, although it pains me not to. I love you, brah. In the butt. Sir SysRq (talk) 03:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For I recognise his name, therefore he must have been in the edit history of an article I like --Veggieburgerfish 23:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

edit Mhaille (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +18
  • Nom. Ever classy, ever prolific Mhaille. He's been the top banana on this site for three years, both as a writer and as an Uncyclopedian, and in this time he's hardly ever let up. Some people may excel at being crazy or unusual, but Mhaille's wit rarely falls down into the gutter. Even when he's writing his patented tasteless articles, his articles still exude a thick air of classiness, and executes the tastelessness in the most clever way you've ever seen. He's funny, highly versatile, and going strong since 2005. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
    • Eh... hate to be a jerk, but I'm changing my vote to for Mhaille, seeing as TLB's pretty much a lost cause, and if not him, I'd like to see Mhaille win this instead. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For the longest time, I was a stand-off observer of Mr. Mhaille. A bit of a secret admirer, if you will. I saw that this great force on Uncyclopedia that has carried this site for so long truly deserved everything he had earned. This is the personification of passion: Mhaille's full of it, and he shows us this in his writing. Recently, I have gotten to know Mhaille a little better through random encounters and whatnot. This has only furthered my view of him as both a strong pillar for the community, and an unstoppable force as a humorist. He's got it all. Mhaille's a great guy, a great op, and a great writer. I'm not voting for Mhaille. But if I'm writing nice little speeches for Cajek and Leddy, then Mhaille is just as deserving of my respect. I love you, man. Butt. Sir SysRq (talk) 03:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. - Writes good stuffs, most features etc. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 10:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. 'Cos he promised me £10 if I did. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 12:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. He deserves this award. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • If I could, I'd split my vote 50/50 between him and Modus, I would. And then I'd still have to give serious consideration to Cajek and Led. As I can't, however, after several minutes thought on the subject, I figured that Mhaille's articles consistently made me laugh more than anyone else's have done. Just. Add in the fact he's been going as long as anyone, and I'm going to have to vote for Mhaille. It's a ridiculously close race though. –—Hv (talk) 2/01 16:24
  • I seriously thought he won this award years ago. I was a bit amused that he was up for it again - deserving as he still is of it - until I just realized that he had never won it in the first place. Anyway, that should be changed forthwith, as Mhaille has not only been writing good articles and whatnot all year, but also last year, and the year before, and the year before, and the year before, and the year before. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For --Simon Brown (Talk) 22:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Parsat (talk / contribs) 04:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Although others write well, Mhaille contributes to a very large and diverse number of different articles especially at new pages. Mhaille has created many articles, but he has had an influence on many. For that, he gets my vote. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 16:05, Jan 9
  • For - Mhaille's distinct style of writing, and even more distinct sense of humour makes for fantastic articles BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) Jan 13, 18:41
  • For - His writing is fantastic, and when he helps me with mine, it makes mine better.--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 05:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. It's Mhaille. It's always Mhaille. Even when I don't "get" his pages, because their all foreign 'n' shit, I know that they don't suck...because it's Mhaille. Everybody here deserves a vote, but only one of these people is Mhaille. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Dig. - Brilliant. Go on, my son. --THINKER 01:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes - --Knucmo2 14:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For when I say his name, I wonder if I have a cold. Am I saying his name right? OMG! AM I DYING????? --Kenvalyi 01:42, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. He has touched me and countless others in places we never thought we would be touched. -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 00:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For? --officer designate Club symbol Lugiatm Club symbol MUN NS CM ZM WH 18:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • 4'. Navwheel-small.png» DJ "Reaper of Fail" Gentoo, now with wit, sarcasm, and even more obscure folk metal. Now in lime green! 21:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

edit Cap'n Ben (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 1
  • Nom. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Er Cap'n Ben, whom has been producing hilarious articles since nigh on the creation of time itself and managed to step up even more this year to fill the void left by users such as me who have been too busy/lazy/writers blocked to write any more stuff. I'll try to form a list of what he's written... --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:47, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Funny, highly versatile, and going strong since 2005. Who else can you say that about on this site? FOR--S0.S0S.0S.0S0 22:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Touche, TKF, but seriously, the Cap'n kicked so much ass in this year of lazy writers. I thought he would be a lock for this... --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 01:18, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Moral support: I've got to go with So So this year, but Ben has also been fucking hilarious. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 01:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

edit Modusoperandi (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +20
  • Nom & For. He's probably the most consistently funny person on the site, writing real quality articles and chucklesome one-liners all over the place. Tends to brighten my day whenever I see him, although that could be the light reflecting off his gleaming naked body. --UU - natter UU Manhole 10:37, Jan 1
  • PHWHORE As per above. Colin Explode fireALL YOUR BASEExplode fireHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 02:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote F☭R SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 02:58, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • I know, this is getting real old (unless you have tl;dr'd my other speeches) for y'all, but there are just so many great nominees this year. However, this is my man. Modus is forever a symbol of genius in my mind. Everything from his talk page banter to his most recent articles and images demonstrates just how fucking funny this silly Canadian is. Modus is just one of those users that has always been here, has always been writing comedic gold, and is just fine with or without recognition. I've never seen him tire, I've never seen the quality of his works slip in the least. He's consistent. He just never runs out. Of the three other nominees I have taken the time to recognize, two have been ops. What Modus has in common with those ops is that they all are great at everything that they do. Modus gets things done, and still has time to write. He's a powerhouse, and is my ideal Uncyclopedian that I someday hope to be. I think we all aspire to be Modus in some form. As a writer, he is unstoppable, and it is for that reason that he has my vote. I love your butt. Sir SysRq (talk) 03:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For Per above, even though Cajek almost got my vote here. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 07:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Darn, but this was close. However, unlike the rest of the candidates, Modus is Modus. No one can compare to his seemingly limitless supply of jokes, be they one-liners, high-hat satires, side-splitting parodies, et cetera. The defense rests, your honor. Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:58, Jan 2
  • I vote for this guy. -- doubtful Ape (delay) (Riot Porn) 21:09, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. IronLung 22:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. This man is made of God and win. --BOMBMafiaGun 15:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote Against. Because I'm confused how this works, exactly. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bradaphraser (talk • contribs) diff
  • For - I probably shouldn't be voting here, since I haven't really existed very much for the past six months or so. Though I suspected this hasn't been Modus's most prolific year, I have read some of his new stuff and it is great. He deserves this. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:43, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. I never would have thought that casting a vote would be so painful as this, but it is. Not that Modus isn't great, he is, but everyone on this page (except moi) is terrific and deserves this award. Still, Modus' star is just that much brighter, because he makes it look so damn easy. And Canada deserves at least one major award for producing something of merit in 2008. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:46, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
But what about the Toronto Maple Leafs? --Kenvalyi 01:44, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Duh. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 08:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
  • The choice is clear! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:50, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Really tough choice, but For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For - For the 1 1/2 years I've been on this site, I've seen a large amount of featured articles. You don't always know what you'll get on the magical world of VFH, but if I see the author is good ol' Modus, I always know I'll love it, without exception. This year's candidates are incredibly hard to choose from, but basing this on consistency, I think Modus has it. Also, his Village Dump posts are always good for a chuckle. - UnIdiot | GUN | Talk | Contribs - 02:26, Jan 15
  • For - There are a lot of good writers here: shit. I thought about who I should vote for, and Modus's name kept coming up. I wish I had this guy's mind, because it's probably delicious. Definitely Modus... or Mhaille... or Led. [note: Thank you for nominating and voting for me, guys! Makes me feel good.]   Le Cejak <14:12 Jan 16, 2009>

Link title

  • For User:Frenchfried
  • For. Modus is like maple syrup. On the outside he's all golden, sweet and sticky. On the inside however, he's all golden, sweet and sticky. This has nothing to do with the vote though. I just like pancakes. And Modus is the pancake of my life. Did I say that out loud? ~Jewriken.GIF 15:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For As many great writers there are to choose from today, i think modus takes the cake... I wonder if a pancake is considered a cake... I want pancakes. Wait, I want pancakes. /me goes to get pancakes. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 15:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

edit Procopius (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 1.5
  • Nom Even though he has been dead for a good majority of the year - coming back periodically to write a few newses and devour brains - I still believe he deserves this for being the most talented individual to ever grace this site. Because I'll never decide between Cajek and Cap'n Ben I'm going to vote for Procopius on principle. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • 1/2 For on behalf of an IP. This is a totally illegal vote, and strike it if you feel you must, but I think it's clear at Talk:The white guy in All-4-One that Tony Borowiak, the white guy in All-4-One, editing as IP 12.88.49.178, would like to throw in his lot for Procopius. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 22:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

edit 15Mickey20 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 1
  • Nom I am a fan. Has done great work all year, especially on the tennis articles, and deserves, at the very least, a nom. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • gah I strongly urge you all to vote for Mickey as he is without doubt one of the funniest people to ever grace this site, and has even stepped up in the last year making even more hilarious articles. However I am just too stuck to vote for Mickey over Cajek and Cap'n Ben. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 06:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • & For No one makes me laugh as consistantly, or as hard as Mickey does. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 07:12, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

edit So So (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 2
  • Nom and for Of my favorite 20 Uncyclopedia articles, So So has written at least six of them. This guy would be one of our national treasures if we were a nation of some sort. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 20:58, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 21:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

edit Hyperbole (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 5
  • Nom & for. Got the hang of this writing thing infuriatingly quickly. Hype dominates the list of my favourite articles of the year, with Turing Duck Test, Schindler's Listcruft and Cell biologists are cooler than molecular biologists just being the tip of the proverbial iceberg. --Christmas present 15Mickey20 Christmas-tree (Ho ho ho to Mickey)  11:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  • FOR Despite being a liar (molecular biologists are way cooler), he's managed to get my attention in the past, and kept it there for a surprising amount of time. MafiaHatBlack.gif Mr. Lavrenti "Digits" Hex 23:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  • FOR I went to random.org and told it to give me a random number between the total number of candidates. His number came up and so he gets my vote. Congrats, Hyperbole! Anyway, I may have gotten the total number of candidates wrong by plus or minus 1, because I often use zero-based arrays in Pascal and COBOL. But that's neither here nor there for this guy Hyperbole. Only the first or last guy in the list has any reason to complain. User:Rsnbrgr 23:53, 10 January 2009 (EST)
  • Thank you. I will treasure this particular vote always. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 18:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

edit Prettiestpretty (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 1
  • Nom. Looking through PP's work earlier, I came to realise she's got a real wealth of quality articles out there, and I'd kind of forgotten just how much good stuff she's produced. Alas, my vote is cast elsewhere, and must remain there, but I think she's certainly worthy of a nom here at the very, very least. --UU - natter UU Manhole 21:55, Jan 5
    Further comment: As some folks are putting comments all over this page, I thought I'd just make the one here. All the nominees here are awesome. I wouldn't complain if any of them won. I love the lot of them, and consider myself lucky to have read their best work and even to know some of them (as well as you can know someone you just edit the same wiki as.) This is the single hardest choice to make on this site, and it shows we have a real depth of talent. I'd just like to mention that, and the fact that if I met any of the people nominated on this page, I'd hug them for being great, and buy them a large measure of their favourite tipple. --UU - natter UU Manhole 21:55, Jan 5
    6/10. /me golfclaps Sir SysRq (talk) 21:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
    Bows. --UU - natter UU Manhole 21:59, Jan 5
    You are just to kind ~me weeps~ Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For I have my reasons. - Bretthead
    Tell me so I can understand what I have done to deserve your support! Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
    He wants to get laid. =] Sir SysRq (talk) 01:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
    Oh... Hugs! Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 03:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
    I wanted to get laid too, which is why I voted for Modus. I voted for you on PotY though, that's worth something. Sir SysRq (talk) 21:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
    Sex is overrated. Now, a disturbingly thorough knowledge of the ancient writings of Luo Guanzhong - there's something you can take to the bank. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 22:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
    So when do I get laid? - Bretthead

edit Uncyclopedian of the Year

edit Cajek (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 6
  • Nomination - Aside from his obvious qualities as a writer Cajek doesn't get the respect he deserves for the work he does on Uncyclopedia. Always helpful to other writers both established and newcomers Cajek has been one of the real workhorses that has seen Uncyclopedia go from strength to strength this year. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  • For. Cajek doesn't just improve the site; he has a knack for encouraging others to get behind him and... oh, dear, that's turning into a sexual innuendo. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 21:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote F☭R SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 03:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote Very Strong For Cajek makes this site very fun. He deserves very strong bannination it! --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 07:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For What they said. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Only limited action by me lately, but I've seen him hard at work helping others.--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 05:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • This is not an easy year to vote. There are quite a few here that I admire for what they did this year...in a non sexual way...or such. But I think that Cajek has initiated the Pee Review revolution which revitalized a part of the site that was dormant for...well...forever! I think Cajek injected us with new energies (as well as sexually transmitted diseases) which managed to make us look, if only for a short while as not being the worst. Unlike the majority of us Cajek cared. ~Jewriken.GIF 13:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
    • You guys are awesome: I love this place, sexually speaking.   Le Cejak <14:09 Jan 16, 2009>

edit TheLedBalloon (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 8
  • Nomination - Bloody funny, generous with his time, much as with Cajek so much goes unnoticed, I am going to struggle to choose between them. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
    • Wuv 10 years from now, I'll still remember my adopter's username. And his home address. Because I'm kinda weird.   Le Cejak <17:16 Jan 01, 2009>
  • For. IronLung 02:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. An ever present, ever friendly, ever helpful admin, and great all-around guy too. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. I love this man. Goddamn if I ever met leddy in a bathroom goddamn some shit would happen. Goddamn. - Bretthead
  • For. He fixes things when I broked them. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 03:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Pretty much per TKF. Nothing else to say on that one. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 07:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Looks like Mordillo is going to win (which I agree with), but I would like to make special mention of Led. Led's style of handling the crap, whilst not getting upset by assholes yet still continuing to write quality articles shows what a awesome dude this guy is. Another thing about Led... When he has made a mistake, he admits it. Twice in over a year I think it was. ;) MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 16:12, Jan 9
  • For There's nothing that Led can't do. Really. Try him. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 22:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

edit 84.194.239.31 (TalkContribs (del)Block (rem-lst-all)WhoisCityProxy?WP Edits)

Score: 1 + 1 vote for the institution of IPotY
Aninhamster

The hamsters will always remember us of his greatness.

  • Nomination - 84.194.239.31 was the one that prophecy had spoken of, the one who would bring balance to the wiki. The awesome 84.194.239.31 was always there to state the obvious, out-grammar anyone and talk existentially. Maybe he's still there, lurking in the shadows, ready to act, to do what is necessary. 84.194.239.31, he was the coolest IP of 2008. He said "nobody has to worry about what happened to me" but still I wonder what happened to him. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 01:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For - I know I'm trowing my vote away, but I can't stand 84.194.239.31 not getting some of the credit he deserves. I wouldn't be able to decide who else to vote for anyway. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For the creation of IP of the Year and this guy being the first. 84.194.239.31 is a stellar chap, killing a rather pesky troll for us and being exceptionally helpful before vanishing off into the distance, preferring the anonymity of his searchable, easily identifiable IP address. This award should be saved for an actual Uncyclopedian, which means that the user must be a MUN at least, in my book anyways. However, this guy still deserves some recognition. (I mean it, IPotY would be awesome, can we make that happen?) Sir SysRq (talk) 21:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
    Do you seriously believe that the almighty 84.194.239.31 can be traced by such simple mechanisms? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
    I don't know what it was that I was trying to say. Don't call me on this shit, I'm making it up as I go, man. Sir SysRq (talk) 22:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

edit MrN9000 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 2
  • Nom & for - A real workhorse, and he's everywhere - encouraging new writers, smithing, reverting, formatting, fixing, helping out and being a real gent. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:24, Jan 1
  • Near-woot The only reason I'm not voting for Pants is because that other guy from England, the one that lives under the ground and controls my thoughts, has been around longer, and helped me navigate this crazy website. GO N!   Le Cejak <17:15 Jan 01, 2009>
  • Comment. I just want to express my gratitude to MrN for being one of the most effective and essential Uncyclopedians to the site for the past year or so. Had Mordillo not been as awesome as he is, my vote would go here. I hold MrN in high regard as being one of the members who sparked a good chain reaction of users doing maintenance and helping to keep the site going, and think he was quite possibly the single most important user in that particular "revolution", as it were. As such, he deserves at the very least, this statement of praise. -RAHB 18:55, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For - hard choice for me to make this year, some fine contributors. His finer points are detailed by others above. The only thing I would add to this is that the work he does has been achieved without the "benefit" of admin rights, which speaks for itself. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

edit Sycamore (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 2
  • Nom - Another absolute Trojan - a recent changes monster, reverter of shite, fixer of vandalism, fighter of fires and wearer of a stylish sporran. Probably does more work than you. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:24, Jan 1
  • For per above. --Mnbvcxz 21:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Since nobody will make him an admin. Harumph! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

edit Mordillo (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +21
  • Nom - He's the admin I see about the place the most, making the bans that need to be made, doing the big bad wolf stuff to keep fuckwits at bay, and generally being the controlling zionist influence on this wiki. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:24, Jan 1
  • Symbol for vote For. - He's good, plus a good admin too. Makes good articles. I fear that I'll be blocked if I don't vote for him. GiratinaOriginForme |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill 800px-Flag of the Philippines svg | 02:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • PHWHORE And stuffs. Colin Explode fireALL YOUR BASEExplode fireHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 02:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Diplomatic, a work horse, responsible, and as I've said time and time again, and will continue to say until the day the Earth stands still, he simply knows how to get shit done. -RAHB 03:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Tough call this year, but I'm voting Mordillo, per RAHB. 'Dillo's the man. - T.L.B. Baloon WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 14:06, Jan 2
  • And I thought WotY was hard. Of the nine current noms, there are seven more than deserving candidates here (I'll let you guys work out who that is), and there's an argument to be made for every one of them. I've thought especially hard about voting for UU, then MrN, then Sycamore. Then I noticed a common thread among them - who is it that they all look up to in a way, and who they ask for help in a firefight? Mordillo. He's been on fire all year pretty much, and overall, I feel I have to vote for him. –—Hv (talk) 2/01 18:18
  • For. Hard working, friendly, effective. Did I forget to mention Jewish? Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 18:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Four as per him being awesome. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 19:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Yeah, he's cool. --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 19:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For despite the whole Gaza thing... -- doubtful Ape (delay) (Riot Porn) 21:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For, BECAUSE of the Gaza thing. Yes. What? Oh, I'm sorry I misunderstood. For anyway.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 00:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Sure. Gramps earns it. It's now or never, considering how old he already is... -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Heart_anim.gif Icons-flag-gb Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 16:37, 7 Jan
  • For. One of the best. And apparently his wife is cute too -- sannse@Wikia (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Mordillo pwns spammers, and is an all around nice guy. --Meganew POST NOW!!! 23:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Always the guy who lays down the law and gets stuff done, without being too serious about it. - UnIdiot | GUN | Talk | Contribs - 00:42, Jan 11
  • W♥v. Hebrew boner. Level headed. Role model. Mediator. More dildos. Only one of these terms refers to Mordillo. And yes, it is "role model." Wait, all of those describe Mordillo perfectly. I think Hv did it for me, made me realize that everyone comes to one person time after time for advice and a little tough love. I don't know who that person is, so I'm basing my vote on userpage vandalism. Mordillo's page has seen more action than...er...Codeine's mum. Oh, and he's a Jew that controls the internet, something you don't see too much these days and therefore needs to be rewarded and recognized. Good work, Mordillo. Sir SysRq (talk) 02:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes. He has shiny shoes. - [13:41 12 January] Sir FSt Don MafiaHatBlack.gif Yettie
  • Bandwagon --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment restored Boobs after it had accidentally been deleted for whatever reason.--Mnbvcxz 15:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
No agenda here, I just love boobs. ~Jewriken.GIF 16:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Dig I love this man. To the point that his girlfriend is seriously distraught by it. Could I be more subtle about it? Absolutely. Will I be more subtle about it? I think you know the answer to that question. You think I care what that bitch thinks? ;) --THINKER 01:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
That's my wife you're talking about! O_O ~Jewriken.GIF 10:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

edit Under user (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 9

edit Modusoperandi (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 2
  • Nom nom nom. He has flavor.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 15:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Spang talk 05:29, 02 Jan 2009
  • For, as per myself. ~ Readmesoon 18:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

edit Heerenveen (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 0
  • Nom I just don't think he gets enough credit for all the stuff he does around here. Deserves at least a nom. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
A nomination just for the sake of nomination? --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
No, a nomination for the sake of everyone saying, "Oh yeah! Heerenveen totally deserves this award. Seeing him here makes me want to vote for him, and whomever nominated him is a sexy, manly, awesome guy!" That's what I was generally going for. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 06:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

edit SysRq (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 1
  • Nom&For I don't even know if Sys would approve of me nominating and for-ing him but I'm going to do it anyway. In my opinion he is one of the brightest lights on uncyclopedia : always funny, always friendly and compassionate as well as passionate (the speeches on WotY demonstrate that) and although my opinion probably doesn't count for much because I keep procrastinating myself on and off the site to the point where I'm shit at everything Uncyclopedia-wise, I still feel strongly that this guy deserves this award. 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 11:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Man, fuck you. Thanks buddy, I appreciate the kind words. To say thank you, I am going to make a simple comment without bitching about you voting for me. Sir SysRq (talk) 20:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

edit January 2009

edit NotM

edit Tagstit (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +12 tits (or tags, if you're into that sort of thing)
  • Nom & for. A good start from Tagstit - writing stuff, reviewing stuff, doing maintenance stuff, and generally being useful. --UU - natter UU Manhole 11:12, Jan 15
  • Nom and for. Exactly what Under user said. --Docile hippopotamus 11:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For per above, and doing pee reviews. --Mnbvcxz 16:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • My god I feel incredibly old every time I come onto this page and For - [17:44 15 January 2009] YYettie
  • W♥v. Welcome to Uncyclopedia. Sir SysRq (talk) 20:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Looks good   Le Cejak <14:36 Jan 16, 2009>
  • For - Low profile, though. Nonetheless, a good user. Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:38, Jan 16
  • Wow! And may I note the stiff competition this month? ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 03:30 17 January 2009
  • That actually brings up a good point. Tagstit (whom I have adopted only after seeing that there is no way he could go wrong) shouldn't just win this because there is no other competition. I hope that fact doesn't cheapen the award for him, because he has certainly earned it, being one of the most stellar noobs I have seen since Yettie. Also, he's a freak in the sack. (Not to mention a freaky sack. Weird.) This isn't like my WotM speech, by the way, he should certainly win this. tl;dr version: He's earned it, even though he's the only nominee. Sir SysRq (talk) 16:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Hey! Good job. IronLung 08:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. A valuable addition to Uncyclopedia. Seriously, we could probably get $4.75 for him. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 18:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For - It is quite possible that this young user has, in his possession, the skillz, which would be required to pay the billz. - T.L.B. Baloon WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 23:47, Jan 17
  • For A charming gent. -RAHB 09:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

edit Rcmurphy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +1 of Tagstit's fiercest competitors
  • Nom. He's done some good stuff, I guess. Actually, to be honest, I don't know who the fuck he is, but he seems like good competition for Tagstit. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 18:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  1. For. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Invalid nom, been on the site since March 2005. --Mnbvcxz 17:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
“Be a MEMBER of no more than 30±3 days membership (Unless you are Rcmurphy)”
~ them rules up there
- [20:51 20 January 2009] YYettie

edit Kit paddle (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +0
  • Nom. Competition for Tagstit, you say? Well, Kit here has also made a good start - friendly, helpful, done a couple of good reviews, started writing, seems to be settling well. Tagstit still gets my vote, but Kit deserves a nod for starting off in the right way. --UU - natter UU Manhole 18:44, Jan 17

edit UotM

edit Benson (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 1 USERS WHO IS NOT BENSON!
  • Comment: This is 2009. Not 2006. --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 00:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment: I know, and Benson is still Benson. --Docile hippopotamus 05:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment Tired, old in-jokes are tired and old. Colin Explode fireALL YOUR BASEExplode fireHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 17:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote Strongest Possible For Because Their is No Alternative. For the love of Oscar Wilde, somebody make a real nomination! But on a serious note, if there isn't anyone who deserves this award, I think it should go to Benson, he did alot of work for the site, and deserves to be recognized. --Mnbvcxz 17:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
    • Frankly I find this nomination insulting to all these who work day and night to keep this place working. This is as bad as nominating Cow go poo for PotM. I think we had enough of Benson. 17:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
      • These joke nominations do get actual nominations made. I could easily think of half a dozen users who deserve this award, but all of them already won it. Seriously, tho, this nomination was made on the 17th! If its insulting to nominate Benson, then its also insulting to nominate no one at all. At least nominating Benson gets someone's attention. --Mnbvcxz 06:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
        • Better not nominate at all then to nominate someone for the sake of it. I'm sure that if the nominator looked harder he would find a plethora of people to nominate. ~Jewriken.GIF 09:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
          • In his defense, it is the 21st, and we have but one other nomination. This joke nomination did get the attention of others and we have a real candidate safely ahead of joke one. If the joke nomination would not have been made, this award would probably have gone idle this year. There are alot of other joke nominations going on to. For example, they are throwing the UGoTY award away on a fake "Wikia" username. At least give it to a person like Jimbo Wales! --Mnbvcxz 18:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol against vote Against. - fuck off--Sycamore (Talk) 17:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • One user, one vote. Both of your votes had the same date/time group, so I'm crossing them both off. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Did you know that your the only one still voting for Benson? --Mnbvcxz 17:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Did you know that Benson was over in 2006? Sir SysRq (talk) 16:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Benson is never "over". --Docile hippopotamus 12:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

edit sannse (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 4
  • N+F. I think it's time that Sannse get some recognition for her work around here. Sure, she's a member of minitrue and that staff hat doesn't really fit her eyes, but all in all over the years I think she's done more than enough to help the site and support it. Now if we can only get her to resign that organization who shall not be named and form a new one who will be called....errr...Likia or Quickia, we will all be happy. ~Jewriken.GIF 17:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. - Per last time--Sycamore (Talk) 17:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • One user, one vote. Both of your votes had the same date/time group, so I'm crossing them both off. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Sycamore and Syko: You've voted twice on the same page. I know you can do that in some circumstances (e.g., you can cast all the votes you want for or against Rcmurphy on NotM), but I don't know if Benson and Rcmurphy share the same kind of... thing. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 21:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
  • One user, one vote. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Oh, you're not allowed to do that?Gis ym esiladnav! SykopediaIrelandLOB 23:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

edit Mnbvcxz (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 9 Backward bottom rows of your keyboard
  • Symbol for vote Nom+For. Despite being nominated GOTM IN THE SAME MONTH, I think this little row of buttons deserves some recognition for peeing all over the place and making lots of templates. And this has nothing to do with him nominating an article of mine for VFH. Really. Oh, and he's not Benson. But mostly for the peeing. Gis ym esiladnav! SykopediaIrelandLOB 21:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
    Dude, that's two for votes and an against vote you've cast. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 17:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. even though he sucks and is a gobshite. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 21:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. per above. --Docile hippopotamus 00:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. A qaulity addition to this site. Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:15, Jan 22
  • 4 - T.L.B. Baloon WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 20:02, Jan 23
  • For A very useful and welcome addition to the site. Mnbvcxz shows interest in improving how Uncyc works at VFD, Pee Review and just about everywhere else for that matter. He works hard all over the site, and his enthusiasm for trying to make us the best we can be is very admirable. Keep it up sir. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 16:10, Jan 25
  • For, because the score just revealed to me where the heck his name came from! That's amazing. - [16:31 25 January 2009] YYettie
  • A must-have, the feel-good user of the previous months, 3.75 out of four stars. Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For His name means something! That is pretty crazy. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 06:44, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

edit WotM

edit An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 11
  • Symbol for vote Nom + ForSir Sycamore (talk) 18:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote for per above. --Mnbvcxz 18:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  • W♥v. Got friggin' robbed last month. Sir SysRq (talk) 19:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Ape is brilliant. He's one of those writers who seem to stay under the radar, then you visit their userpage and realise just how many good articles they've written, and therefore how many times the've made you laugh. --UU - natter UU Manhole 19:15, Jan 8
  • Per SysRq Yeah! Some Asshole beat him last month. It was awful! Actually, Sys is a pretty great author as well, and deserved it.... not that he can ever know I think that. And now to insult him more... Whomever beat him sucks. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 19:34, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For as per last month, and the year before that, and the year before that... Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:07, Jan 13
  • For As per pretty much everything he's ever written. Colin Explode fireALL YOUR BASEExplode fireHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 19:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Despite the whole Gaza thing. ~Jewriken.GIF 17:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Before I forget to vote for him. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 13:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Hesitant due to his lack of recent activity, but he is deserving of getting this. -RAHB 09:44, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
  • As Before --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 06:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

edit IronLung (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 1
  • Symbol for vote Nom + For. This is a tough call. Ape has written several awesome articles, but has done virtually nothing in two and a half months. IronLung has written only one feature, but that feature was my favorite article of December. He's not incredibly experienced, but he really did come through in the very slow month that was December. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 18:47, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Holy crab cakes! I'm honoured and surprised to even get a mention. IronLung 22:31, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Spiritual For. I've already voted, but when you nomm'd next month, you've got my vote. : ) Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:41, Jan 20

edit February 2009

edit WotM

edit DrStrange (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 10 strange fans

edit Sycamore (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 4
  • Nom & For. Syc rocks in so many ways, but among those is that way he rocks as an author. As well as fixing up and keeping an eye on pretty much every Scottish article to stop them being total shite, he's written quality, articles, by, the, crate, load, and has been doing so for a good while now. Time to recognise that. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:46, Feb 2
  • For. DrStrange is really good too, but Syc's been doing this consistently for ages. To be honest, I thought he'd already won it, but since he hasn't, my vote must go here. –—Hv (talk) 3/02 17:48
  • For. Indeed, Dr Strange is great but so is Syc and, as its already been said, he's done this for quite a while. --Kit talk 12:57 23 February 22px-Flag of Sweden
  • For doing an awful lot of small, inglorious work that requires solid writing nonetheless. Every morning I wake up here in the states (at a godawful early hour) and Syc's ID is like a rash across the "recent changes" page.--DRStrangesig5 Sherman Fingertalk  13:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
    • How pathetic--Sycamore (Talk) 17:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
      • Just accept the bloody compliment, it's sincere. Your service is an additional consideration on top your writing skills and a valid reason to vote for you. My values hold that I vote for one of my opponents and you get the nod. Tough Noogies--DRStrangesig5 Sherman Fingertalk  23:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

edit Cap'n Ben (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 9
  • Nom & For. Yes, Ben's won this before, more than three years ago. But he's been so fucking hilarious for the last few months that I think he deserves seconds. Sloppy seconds, if you will. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 18:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Got totally dicked on WotY, completely deserves this thingy again. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Writer of the Month is a different beast to what it was three years ago. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  20:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Holla. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 10:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • for. i subscribe to the school of thought which claims that cap'n ben deserves this award again. i also subscribe to Gigantic Asses, but i'm not sure that's relevant. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • for. --Docile hippopotamus 04:58, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For Per the above. Seems the Captain is our earliest WotM who's still writing actively, and even that in itself is an accomplishment. -RAHB 07:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • I did the longest audio I ever managed for this schmuck and he never even said thank you. ~Jewriken.GIF 17:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. - Some of the best work on the site is by the Cap.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

edit UotM

edit Mordillo (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +9 admins who takes way to much flak
  • N+F, he's everywhere, and despite winning this award already (as well as UOTY), he continues to do the things that need to be done, but aren't being done by other people because every other user is a lazy drunk. There. I said it. You all are lazy drunks. Mordillo may be a drunk, but at least he's a motivated drunk. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. There is no cabal. TYATU does not say that there is a cabal. Muganez knows nothing about the nonexistant cabal. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 21:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. - The Zionist conspiracy can sap and impurify all my bodily fluids...--Sycamore (Talk) 16:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For Whatever it was 'dillo did to win this last time, he's been accomplishing ten-fold as of late, and been one of the main driving forces in the maintaining of what little redeeming value we allegedly have left. Oh, who am I kidding. Uncyclopedia never had any redeeming value.. -RAHB 22:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For --Docile hippopotamus 05:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • A relative is as close as I'm going to get to this award. - [17:00 9 February 2009] YYettie
  • Moar Dildos plz k thx. - RougethebatAdmiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate SonicLivesPicture 17:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. I write an article and it gets fixed seconds after, first I thought it was automated :P that guy is amazing. Besides he lives just across the border (bur don't count on me to cross) ChadiW
  • 4 - T.L.B. Baloon WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 22:00, Feb 20

edit RAHB (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 2 obsessed admirers
  • Symbol for vote RAHB is a relentless greeting party for shitty articles. Last month he performed valuable functions such as protecting his own user page, featuring his own article, and barely mentioning his own penis. Legend. IronLung 07:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
    • I have been a little behind on my penis quota lately, I suppose... -RAHB 22:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For, reminds me of a young me. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
    Please. Yung Mi was a hack compared to this guy. I am unable to resist. --UU - natter UU Manhole 11:11, Feb 11

edit Sannse (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +10 minions of Wikia that aren't evil
  • Symbol for vote Nom + 4 per last month, hasn't won the award yet. --S'r Mnbvcxz 15:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For - Girls FTW! ^_^ -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Heart_anim.gif Icons-flag-gb Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 16:41, 7 Feb
  • For. I'd vote for all the entrants this month, but if Mnbvcxz is right and Sannse hasn't won this yet then something is seriously wrong with the world. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 16:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • As before. ~Jewriken.GIF 17:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote Hell yes --CharitwoTalk 08:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Per my odd policy of wanting to give awards to people who are deserving but haven't won them yet ahead of people who are ace but have already won the damn award (see also WotM and Cap'n Ben v Syc). Mordillo's great, but he's already got this and UotY. That's tons of recognition. Sannse does plenty of helpful stuff and deserves this. --UU - natter UU Manhole 11:09, Feb 11
  • For. Because I can =) (and other reasons that make sense but are too long too list.. blah) --kit 09:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For per UU. Also, grammar, damnit. –—Hv (talk) 18/02 19:34
  • STRONG FOR Per UU. We seriously haven't given Sannse this yet? I'm slightly disappointed in you, <insert name here>. What the hell's your problem? -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN22:56, 25 Feb
    • sannse should have won a few months ago in my opinion, I was little "disappointed" myself - Mordillo deserves some serious kudos this month - he's has carried a lot in the past while. It is my understanding that this award is often dodgy in the order of winners and hopefully normal service will resume:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
  • W♥v, just to make y'all shut the fuck up about sannse. The preceding unsigned comment was added by SysRq (talk • contribs)
    • Sig yourself, person who I assume to be SysRq >:| --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:35, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
      • Fine, just to make y'all shut the fuck up about four tildes. Sir SysRq (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

edit Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 5 Sockpuppet voters
  • Nom+4 Well, I have no idea who any of these guys above are, so here is an actual nomination... When I first met this user I thought he was nothing but trouble. Now, um... Yea. All the usual attributes for a UotM, votes well on VFH/VFD, fights vandals, welcomes users, QVFD... You know the drill. Generally a very useful and welcome guy to have around the place. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 16:37, Feb 7
  • Symbol for vote Woohoo! I'm nominated! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:40, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Like I said, the guy has real class... MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 16:43, Feb 7
It feels good to be great. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote Motherfucker keeps jumping out from behind a dumpster and categorizing all my pictures. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 23:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
    I do it with love. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
    That's what you said about the rape case. I still can't believe the judge let you off. -RAHB 23:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
    But I was telling the truth! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:40, Feb 10
  • For. I almost decided against this when you said you wanted to rape a shemale. Not mentioning that anymore. Best of luck! S-984 21:36, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Hey, wait I didn't do that (or I don't remember doing that... damn this shortterm memory)! Oh well, I guess that does count as a vote anyways, so... Eh. S-984 01:09, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

edit SysRq (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 5 systems that meet Uncyclopedia's requirements
  • Nom - I've been impressed with a number of thing about Sys, and I feel that hes stepped up the plate in recent months to be a really worthwhile contender for this. I've been exceptionally impressed with the contribuions to colonization - its green shoots at the moment, but its the kind of effort which I beleive will make the place nicer in a much more meaningful way. I'm going to stick with Mordillo as I think that a bit of firworks is deserved, but next month I think Sys should be the winner of this award.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:11, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. BECAUSE NOBODY ELSE WILL. --SoIwastolazytolearnGermanic.jpg-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 22:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. He peed on my work and generally abuses me! Definatly a worthy contender for UotM ^^ ...Flare 22:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Get back in your cage. Sir SysRq (talk) 22:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. For taking up the mantle of Imperial Colonization. I'm mean, fuck, that's a fairly major thing alone, and he does other things on top of that, so yeah. --Guildensternenstein 03:25, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For sure! I am surprised he hasn't won this! I couldn't ask for a better UnDaddy because of his help and positive criticism which is grounds enough alone to vote for him. He write hilarious and quality stuff. He is fun to talk to. And he even started The Imperial Colonization! He is an example of an Uncyclopedia Man (rip off of Renaissance Man for those less historically gifted) and although other's are going to win it this month, he deserves it for next month hands down. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 03:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
  • for. for stealing my idea, and by 'stealing' i mean 'doing better than i ever could have'. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Oh Jesus Christ. If there are any more votes making my original sympathy vote sound irrelevant, I'm going home. --SoIwastolazytolearnGermanic.jpg-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 14:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

edit NotM

edit CheddarBBQ (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +3 Triangular Snackfoods
  • Nom+For The AFI article. Made me laugh my ass off. Can't believe he's a n00b.--The Limon Killer 21:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For I love that guy.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 21:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For Fucking AFI! YEAAAAAAAAAAAHHH!!!!!! (I like AFI)--Davey Havok 21:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Sockpuppetry. I checked the contribs of these other two voters and their only edits have been these votes. I'm not absolutely certain, but I'm certain enough to strike out this nom and be corrected later. Sir SysRq (talk) 21:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

edit Guildensternenstein (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +10 Stern guilded steiner, sterns...
  • Nom+For From what I can see there is great potential to mold this Noob-User, and he follows instructions about the importance of signing his posts. So I'm cutting him some slack and nomming him. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. A fine humorist of the top-notchest sort. Even though you clean-swept my Mars Volta article, calling it "not very good" and falsely accusing it of being listed for deletion. At least you replaced it with a slightly amusing piece, so I don't hate all of your guts. TPLN 02:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Vote change. I don't really like vote changers, but Metal Gear Solid was brilliant, along with UnBooks:The Lost Introduction to Walden, and I haven't really seen Kit paddle around for a while. So there. Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:30, Feb 21
  • Symbol for vote For.. I fucking hate vote changing. It says to people, "I am indecisive and my constitution is weak, and I have the internal fortitude of a meringue". However, as these folks will only be eligible for the award once, I wanted to make sure it went to the absolute best candidate. Guildensternenstein is absolutely that best candidate. IronLung 03:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Sold me with Walden --DRStrangesig5 Sherman Fingertalk  03:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For I am not just following a pattern here. Although I found Guildensternenstein with a rough first week with rather empty reviews and such, I see now that the improvement of this guy is unmatched! With a great mind, as proven in Metal Gear Solid, and a strong satirical talent, as proven in his new unbook, he is on the way to becoming an amazing writer. He also has improved in his reviews drastically. I think Kit is still a good guy, but you don't see him around as much anymore and since this is the last month for Guildensternstein to be awarded this, he should definitely have it. Keep up the good work! ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 01:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Stealth for. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 06:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. - I love his work, a really great addition to the site.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Wow, Metal Gear Solid was written by a noob? Well, Fuckin' A. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 21:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • W♥v. It took me all month, but I came up with Gildy as my Noob of the Month. He's probably the most impressive writer of the bunch (as impressive as all of them are) and is also turning out to be quite the Uncyclopedian. Good job, buddy. This was probably the hardest NotM I've ever voted on. Sir SysRq (talk) 21:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

edit Kit paddle (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +4 Paddles
  • Nom+For A few high quality articles from Kit, does reviews, and edits. His reviews are in depth and informative. Besides, Guildensternstein begged me to nominate him for this in a review and I thought that was a little weak. Sorry man. Good luck to all nominees though! No hard feelings Guildensternenstein! ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 22:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Oh cool, he's still eligible, by my count. Yeah, I like Kit - helpful, friendly, done a few good reviews, written some interesting stuff, including Star Trek Online, and seems very promising. --UU - natter UU Manhole 22:19, Feb 2
  • Symbol for vote Yes. IronLung 07:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Whoa! We actually have a race! Kit's done the most in my eyes, and gets my vote. Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:22, Feb 5
  • For. --Docile hippopotamus 04:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • You betcha. --SoIwastolazytolearnGermanic.jpg-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 22:09, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For I've heard of this guy! -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN22:52, 25 Feb
Maybe I havent been writing my own stuff for a week or so but Ive been around editing and peeing. I understand though why some would rather go with one that writes more. No hard feelings =) Im not here to get awards anyway, just hang out and have a good time. Cheers! --Kit talk 07:35 23 February 22px-Flag of Sweden
I don't care if my votes never amount to anything. You're noob of the month in my eyes. --SoIwastolazytolearnGermanic.jpg-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 00:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

edit Apage (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +1 votes on a page

edit ThomasPynchonsLeftNut (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +4 People who just noticed the genital references
  • Nom I noticed him, when I saw one of his reviews. He also shows a lot of writing talent in his edits, and looks to be a great addition to Uncyc. Check out his contributions, and see what this chap is up to... MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 01:55, Feb 5
  • For. Brilliant. And a gentleman to boot. Give him the little pacifier, I say. May I also suggest such delicious fare as Leonard Cohen, Coen Brothers and Canadian Football League. Oh shit. Each one of those is worse than the last. I've just self-deprecated myself out of this prize. Well, you all can go suck a box, anyways. TPLN 02:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
HeHe. Unfortunately, tis one vote per user. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 04:24, Feb 5
Just stuffing the ballot box in my favor, per longstanding democratic principles. Oh, hey, and how about you go visit my horoscopes contribution and vote for (or against) me based solely on that? Hmmmm?--TPLN 00:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For I reviewed two of his articles, and found them both fairly entertaining. I also re-wrote his Mars Volta article that I didn't know was his, so I'm more-or-less obligated to make up for that. Anyway, TPLN is sick because he, like I, like Pynchon, TMV, Coach Dungy, and who knows what else. I think I've found a soul mate. Well, not really. And now I've rambled on for a good long time without actually saying anything or being funny. Anyway, he's my pick. --Guildensternenstein 04:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For Tough choice this month. Very happy to see the influx in good new editors coming in, we've been devoid of that extra boost for far too long it seems. -RAHB 07:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • You too can be James Bond and/or Roger Moore. - [17:09 11 February 2009] YYettie
  • Comment. TPLN is my runner up. He's up on my list because he's becoming a great Uncyclopedian as well. However, I only get one vote per month. Boo. Sir SysRq (talk) 21:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm with you, SysRq. TPLN is my runner-up also. But, as per my still standing vote Guildenboob is still my choice unless he changes his vote to himself. -- TPLN 22:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

edit ChadiW (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +4
  • N+F Good noob, contributing nice Unnews articles. We like this kind of noobs. He is also, as far as I know, the only Lebanese Uncyclopedian we have. So instead of bombing him, I nominate him. O_O ~Jewriken.GIF 13:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. I don't vote here often, but this guy stands out - he's very good. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 13:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Sympathy For, in the wake of just seeing Waltz with Bashir. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
You know that an Israeli movie. ~Jewriken.GIF 19:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, but it was about the horrors of the war in Lebanon. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

edit Rcmurphy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +3
  • Who honestly thought we were going to go a month without an RC nomination? Spang talk 22:38, 16 Feb 2009
    • Okay, NOW this race just got tight. Sir SysRq (talk) 15:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
  • +1 To be honest, so few on that years, two of the only thing I've reading that has made sense is Spang. —Braydie 22:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Seriously this time he really deserves it. Plus I've never heard of those other guys. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN22:50, 25 Feb
    • Oh yeah? Well Rc has never heard of you. Whatcha gonna do now? Sir SysRq (talk) 15:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
      • Build him a shrine in my closet and shoot a random celebrity to get his attention? -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN21:46, 26 Feb

edit March 2009

edit WotM

edit Sycamore (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +10 tartan scribes

edit Asahatter (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +9 Mad headgear enthusiasts
  • Nom & for. Every so often, one comes across an article which really makes you sit up and take notice of an up-and-coming writer. For Mr Hatter, that article was the brilliant Printer Ink. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  11:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • W♥v. Syc's good, damn good. But Printer Ink was brilliant satire and was a shining example of what I think this site is (or should be) all about. Asahatter has exhibited tremendous writing talent and a lot of potential. He's already been putting out other great works, and for that he is my Writer of the Month. This month's Dramatic SysRq Speechvote is brought to you by the letter K and the number 4. Sir SysRq (talk) 20:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For Cool, made me giggle, just a little, very apt, you thought of me--Aitch1968 23:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Über-for. Every single one of his articles has forced me into fits of mirth. Love this guy's work. Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:03, Mar 2
  • For Mostly just because I like his username. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN17:31, 4 Mar
  • Yeah! - T.L.B. Baloon WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 05:10, Mar 6
  • For. --Docile hippopotamus 03:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Actually made me bother to come back and leave again. Thanks a lot, bastard. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Printer Ink, mother fuckers. —Sir Guildensternenstein 03:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

edit Nachlader (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +4 tasteful characters
  • Nom & For. It said I should nominate and vote for the user that had me giggle and chuckle. Nachlader did more than that. I laughed 'til I peed (yes.. I started writing reviews!). With his sexual fantasies, his geographical knowledge, his historical knowledge and his unmatched knowledge on contemporary events I nominate thee. Cheers for your great work! --Kit talk 21:12 1 March 22px-Flag of Sweden
  • Somebody nom'd me? Ohgodohgodohgodohgodohgodohgod. --SoIwastolazytolearnGermanic.jpg-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 21:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Very inspirational chap this. Even if the inspiration made me think about dongs an awful lot --Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 00:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • for. my favorite writer here --Allmightyred 11:06, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

edit Cap'n_Ben (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +9 Again (Again)
  • Again -RAHB 03:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Again again again --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. Because he didn't get it last month.  –  FuhQ.gifFuhQ  ZDsig.gifZDsig Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 22:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. - Looking over the noms it looks like Asahatter will win, however I kind of feel that the Cap has produced a far greater portfolio of work, despite winning this award few years ago. As per last month.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Er no. I'm a spasmodic contributor. Happy for Sycamore or Cap'n Ben to win for their consistency & longevity. See where my vote lies, but thanks to those who've voted for me - watch this space. --Asahatter (annoy) 00:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • As per last month. Ben deserves more recognition. MORE MORE MOR. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 19:55, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For. He's still here, and he's still writing. I'm kind of surprised that he hasn't got a promotion. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:19, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Ben there; he done that. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 14:37, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  • for. 90% because i feel ben should win, 10% to force a three-way tie on the 17th. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
  • If he doesn't win I'll donate my body to science. ~Jewriken.GIF 16:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

edit Docile hippopotamus (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

I'm not even nomming this guy. I have no idea who he is, or his other works. All I know is that HowTo:Become RAHB made me laugh very hard. True, it's the only article I've read in over a month, and I have no idea if he's even written anything else, but whatever. I have schoolwork to be busy with. And I broke my nose. That sucked. But none of that is important now because I laughed at what this guy wrote, and I don't know where else to give him credit. But he deserves credit. And I don't even know what credit is, but he gets a lot of it from me. That is if it is a boy. If it isn't I apologize to you, Ma'am, for getting your gender wrong. You see, we don't get many lady-types around these parts, and I'm generalizing. Sorry if you were at all offended. And, as a side note, shouldn't this page be updated???1?1? Whatever, its really late, and I'm going to bed. But this article ruled. YEAH! The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 09:06, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

  1. This may be better suited for [[Talk:HowTo:Become RAHB]]
  2. We know you broke your nose
  3. ????
  4. Profit!
Sir SysRq (talk) 00:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
P.S. Shaw. Better suited, phhhh. No one looks at those pages. Who gets credit from people on discussion pages? Here is the place to be. For all the cool kids. And this guy is cool, and I'm talking about him here. Power to the little guys who I know nothing about, but made me laugh. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 02:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

No one knows why RAHB listens to Frank Zappa, not even RAHB. The man speaks volumes of truth. -RAHB 01:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

edit UotM

edit SysRq (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +15

edit Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 9 registered users using a sockpuppet
  • Nom - He does some very helpful stuff around here.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)‎
  • Comment: I'm tempted to vote for myself, but I'll see how things work out. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For. I am much attracted to the prospect of voting for SysRq, but I gotta vote for the person who has a near-omnipotent presence around the damn place. --SoIwastolazytolearnGermanic.jpg-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 15:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment. I'm going to be lurking on this contest. Sock vs Sys.--DRStrangesig5 Sherman Fingertalk  23:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
    • Cute. Make a shirt. Sir SysRq (talk) 00:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
      • Actually, that sounds like a great idea. A quick chop-job using a mooninite and the familiar socky pic. Maybe a movie poster. It'll have lasers.--DRStrangesig5 Sherman Fingertalk  00:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
        • Indeed. Lasers make everything better. Well, sometimes not. Like if you're giving birth. Then lasers become an obstacle. Let me rephrase: lasers make everything more awesome. There, that works. Sir SysRq (talk) 00:33, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For --Mnb'z 02:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For -RAHB 03:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For --Docile hippopotamus 08:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For. He does a lot of stuff here. Also he saved my first page from an unregistered user who replaced all the content for one sentence. You are my hero man (Uh... maybe I'm exaggerating).--A guy with a pipe 19:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. I want SysRq to lose. Oh, and SOAUU is cool too.--SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 18:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. Sissy is awesome but Socky is my hero. --Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 00:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For. He's done much for me lately, unlike Janet Jackson. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 04:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For. I tossed a coin and it landed heads (which meant I voted for Sys) then Socky gave me a large pile of cash. Simple eh. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 13:41, Mar 28

edit NotM

edit ThomasPynchonsLeftNut (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 1 testicle(s) of a reclusive writer

*Nom & For. As every bit as funny as I am (*is humble*), and a HELL of a lot more prolific. I mean, hell, the guy's written well over twice the number of articles I have, including the first IC effort Al Gore. This shouldn't even be a contest, really. Although I guess sort of it is. Anyway...--Guildensternenstein 02:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Ineligible. Misses the age limit by a good half a month. You're right, it was no contest. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
I don't feel like a noob anyway. The gesture is sweet. --TPLN 04:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh...hell...well, nevermind then. --Guildensternenstein 05:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
And I'm deleting my vote for future voting-for-this-award purposes. --Guildensternenstein 05:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

edit Sonje (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 14 photoshop pros
  • Nom+for. So have we ever had a nomination for NotM based on images alone? Sonje has been here some two or three weeks, has yet to write an article... But no matter. Uncyclopedia has 700 writers for every one user who can manipulate the hardy mistress of the sea that is potatochop with immense skill, right? Plus, she has made some pretty good images, including the latter being a current VFP nomination. Also, she's a female. You're not gonna go vote on gender prejudice, are you? --SoIwastolazytolearnGermanic.jpg-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 11:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For per above. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For Even though the rules say she technically has to write an article first. But I AM ADMIN! I SCOFF AT YOUR RULES! -RAHB 03:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • That's a stuuuuupid rule anyway. When I won the NotM, I got my next-door neighbour to write my articles. --SoIwastolazytolearnGermanic.jpg-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 16:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Aw! Thanks 4FOR the nom Nachlader! And RAHB, I promise to have some articles by the end of the month, potatochopping is just so very addictive. Still, I appreciate your scoff --Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 19:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • I think that rule can be ignored so long as the noob in question uses proper English and does not use numbers to replace words...ahem. Sir SysRq (talk) 19:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • You can't vote both "for" and "against" in the same month. That would be voting twice, you see. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 22:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • I also hate to be a stickler for rules, but you can't vote twice. Same goes for the below. I'm going to cancel out the ill-will against votes, though if you wish to keep them and cancel your For votes instead that's fine with me. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 23:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol against vote Against. I agree with Zana yeah your pics are cool, but you should write something. Why doesn't someone nominate for potatochopper of the month instead?-- - StonedJeff  Spinningweed2.gifTALK talk to me 00:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Dude, that's two votes. You, like, totally only get one. Hippy. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • They already have, thank you. But I think it is a bit unfair, I mean this award is not for "Writer" of the month, it is for N00b of the month. I'm sure there is an award for Writers too. So I think it is rather discriminatory. But each to his own... --Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 01:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For because IKEA told me to. --Kit talk 22px-Flag of Sweden 21:55 15 March

*Against This kid is perfect for Photoshopper of the month. But rules are rules. I don't even think he should be considered here. Good pictures are great, but I need to see some writing. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tagstit (talk • contribs) diff

  • Sorry! I didn't even see the rules changed recently, making this guy/girl an obvious for! I can't even do close to that good photoshop. No hard feelings I hope! ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 16:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Please sign your vote, or else it won't count. --Mnb'z 04:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Oops, sorry, I was almost sure I did. ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 21:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For any idiot can write an article, and the rules don't even say it has to be a good article. And, the rules have been changed. --Mnb'z 04:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Emphatic for. Showing up and improving the art on established articles is, like, the most useful thing anyone's ever done here since Benson of the Month. We already have quite a few good writers; good artists are hard to come by. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 22:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For. She has talent. And she doesn't make a fuss unlike some other people in this month's vote. ~Jewriken.GIF 10:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

*You win Half way, through the month and already ten votes, it's no contest.--SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 19:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

You probably do win, but I just found out I was nominated, and although this will make me look like a dick, I have to give myself that tiny bit of hope--SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
No hard feelings, thanks anyway. Congrats on the nom and may the best n00b win. --Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 20:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
You will. (Unless 7 random people decide to simultaneously create accounts and vote me NotM as their first Uncyclopedian acts of course, fingers crossed)--SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
  • soitenly. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For. CBBQ has developed quicker and betterer than I expected, but Sonje has been doing a fantastic job and gets my support. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:48, Mar 23
  • F♥r per the against votes she has received. Dicks. Sir SysRq (talk) 13:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For changing the rules when necessary. Woody On Fire! Wood burningTalking Woody Stalking Woody 17:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

edit StonedJeff (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 4
  • yo your a fuckin dork how about i come knock your dick in the dirt?-- - StonedJeff  Spinningweed2.gifTALK talk to me 22:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Conversing with you is problematic, as it appears that we are using two different languages. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
  • I tried to knock Modus's dick in the dirt this one time, but he nearly banned me. In fact, let me tell you that story. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 23:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
So there I was
sitting on the fucking couch, doing my Stoned Jeff thing with bong and the dogs, right? Like, pothead nerd shit.
and fucking Modusoperandi
comes into the forum, musk all over the place, and instead of going for the bong, he makes an unsignedline straight for me
so I grabbed for his
dick and tried to knock it in the dirt, and he tries to ban me! WTF?
I barely got away with an eternal reputation for general faggotry and a severed brachialis radial.
Unsigned story. Doesn't count. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
In Russia, Comments unsign you!--DRStrangesig5 Sherman Fingertalk  00:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

edit CheddarBBQ (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 6 Triangular Snackfoods
  • Nom & For. He's improved a lot since first joining, and his recent articles have been quite good. He pesters me on my talk page a lot, but only because he's a dedicated Uncyclopedian commited to whatever admittedly ill-defined standards of excellence we carry. —Sir Guildensternenstein 04:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Glad to see you appreciate my pestering. I'll be sure to keep it up.--SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
Beautiful. —Sir Guildensternenstein 02:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For.. Constantly patrols VFH, VFP, VFD (WTF?), PEE, etc. x2. For. Did I mention "For"? ZhelielCow.jpg » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow » 15:52, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For.. Good stuffs, this guy. Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:06, Mar 18
  • Symbol for vote Holy Crap I never thought I'd been nominated. *sniff* I just want to thank all my fans. Oh, I promised myself I wouldn't cry.--SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
  • Symbol for vote For. this noob guy helped me a lot, he also.. ahem.. ADOPTED ME! I have to vote for him, Adopapa. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA Flag of Egypt AMUSE ME 22:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. This guy has serious potential. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 13:36, Mar 28

edit Rcmurphy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 1
  • For. Phew, almost missed it. Pretty sure he's still in with a chance though. Spang talk 22:23, 29 Mar 2009

edit April 2009

edit WotM

edit Nachlader (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 4
  • NOM&FOR. It seems like its been ages since we both helped fill that old Youth VFH page with assorted debate but since that time (especially in the last month or so) I've seen Nach pump out some highlight material in quick succession. Do I even need to list them here? It should be damn fresh in your mind! Promote the kid to GUN, he deserves it.--DRStrangesig5 Sherman Fingertalk  10:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Good writer, good bloke. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 10:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • For per above. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • For per last month. --Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 22:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
    I still luv u Nachy but Guildy is on a rol this month. --Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 12:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
    You break my heart, Sonje. I almost forgot I was on the WotM list anyway, heh. --SoIwastolazytolearnGermanic.jpg-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 15:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • For. I may have been busy this month but I won't forget voting for you! You're still the best in my eyes! --Kit talk 22px-Flag of Sweden 23:22 24 April
    <3 --SoIwastolazytolearnGermanic.jpg-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 22:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

edit RabbiTechno (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +3
  1. Symbol for vote nom + for - Writes good stuffs--Sycamore (Talk) 11:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  2. Floor Rough Pubs was inspired --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 13:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  3. Symbol for vote For. Like Sycamore said, writes good stuff. Gotta love the anarchist sparrows and and Nazi cows. ImNotASunbeam 22:54, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

edit Cap'n Ben (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 6

edit Guildensternenstein (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 14
  • Nom and for - GSS is a little new here, but he's written four awesome FAs in just two months, as well as several other outstanding articles. I'm not sure how I'm going to vote this month, yet, but he definitely deserves a nom. After reviewing his contributions, I'm throwing him my support. Ben is hilarious, but then, Ben's won before. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 20:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. Guildy definitely deserves this for putting up with my pestering (which, mind you, WILL CONTINUE!)--SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 00:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Enthusiastic Self-For. Thank you all, seriously. —Sir Guildensternenstein 00:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • for Djdorama 20:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • well-deserved For. I like the guy's articles. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA Flag of Egypt AMUSE ME 04:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Good stuffs. Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:31, Apr 13
  • For.He is prolific and funny, a rare combination. --CrabPope 12:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  • 4 - T.L.B. Baloon WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 16:16, Apr 19
  • For. My talkpage is spammed with his 'danke schon' templates. --Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 12:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  • For Ya, more of a pity vote because as hard as he tries, he still doesn't have as many features as me...oh wait...shit...~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 16:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote Madam I'm Adam --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 23:05, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
    Comment Hurray for John Milton! —Sir Guildensternenstein 01:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • For. --Docile hippopotamus 04:27, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • For. On a hot streak this month, and I hope it continues. --UU - natter UU Manhole 16:59, Apr 25
  • Symbol for vote For. No contest this month. --Romartus 22:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

edit Asahatter (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +1

edit Modusoperandi (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 2
  • Symbol for vote Nom and For. Modus is a genius, and because he'll never win writer of the year again, we should make him Writer of the Month at least twelve times. IronLung 01:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For For For Good idea. ZhelielCow.jpg » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow » 12:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

edit UotM

edit Guildensternenstein (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 1
  • Symbol for vote NOMFOR Pretty obvious reasons. List not necessary.--SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 22:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • A would-be self against... ...but I voted for Dexter just a second ago. I can see getting WotM, but I in no way deserve this. I mean, I'm not an admin, I don't photoshop my own images (props to my friend Lee for doing that for me), and I just got slapped on the wrist by TKF for a not-so-great Pee I gave of the most recent Colonization. Although, to be fair, he nominated it well before I had a chance to review it, and so should have caught said mistakes himself. But in any event, I don't deserve this. And seeing as I'm 12 votes down, I'm not going to get it. So yeah. —Sir Guildensternenstein 22:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

edit Dexter111344 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 17
  • Yes yes yes yes. I wanted to do this. I really wanted to. Dexter should have gotten this months ago, yet for some reason he seems to be just under the radar with every coming vote. Despite this, he's always worked tirelessly and consistently since 2007. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 19:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I don't pay attention ever okay I just think you're awesome deal with it. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)