Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 6

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
2005 • 2006 (part 1) • 2006 (part 2) • 2007 (part 1) • 2007 (part 2) • 2008 (part 1) • 2008 (part 2) • 2009 (part 1) • 2009 (part 2) • 2010 (part 1) • 2010 (part 2) • 2011 (part 1) • 2011 (part 2) • 2012 (part 1) • 2012 (part 2) • 2013

Contents

edit Writer of the Year

edit The Thinker (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 17 people who are not Thinkerer
  1. Nomination + Support. The Thinker has had one hell of a year writing articles; he's got a number 17 on the Hall of Shame, but if you counted all the collaborations and rewritings he's done in full, that number balloons to a full 20. Not to mention that he's the man with the most articles in the Top3, including but not limited to Mr. Kearsy, Folgers Crystals, Drunk Olympics, and the most highly favored article on VFH to date, Why?:Pour Boiling Hot Water Down Your Trousers?. His features aren't all he's got, though, as he's spent a lot of his writing on the site THINKERING less fortunate articles rather than just starting from scratch, and these rewrites and collaborations are only second in quantity to One Eyed Jack, and likely the best in quality the whole wiki over. In short, it's a real tough call to make, but Thinker just about edges out the competition in my book, and since I didn't get to vote for him on WotM, I'll give him my vote here. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 00:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Big Support. THINKER is my favorite writer on this site (even more than myself). Many of his articles are my personal favorites. I log on to Uncyc looking forward any new articles he might have. I believe that he deserves it the most. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 06:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. For. Whether it be his own originals, collaborations, or THINKERing the hell out of other people's stuff, he contributes brilliant stuff consistently. This is a really tough call given the quality of the noms, and I wouldn't complain if any of these guys won, but THINKER deserves it most in my book. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. I'm too hungover to write things. THINKER is the best writer on the site. Give him this. The end. -RAHB 20:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. For --Æ 20:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  6. STRONG FOR. Per RAHB's hungover yet true comment. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • formspring) 20:54 Jan 01, 2008
  7. For. After going through some of his stuff, I must say he is a very funny guy. - UnIdiot | GUN | Talk | Contribs - 19:04, Jan 2
  8. For. Responsible (at least in part) for two of the very best articles of the year. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  9. Five Just cause I can--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 08:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC
  10. for THINKER is genuinely hilarious. if he wins, i shall erect a monument in his honor. "Violetflavoured nuisance 01:10, 7
    Well, I hate to tell you this, but I've already "erected" a "monument" in his honor, if you know what I mean, heh, heh..... penis...-RAHB 07:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  11. for Funny, funny stuff... I nearly peed myself.  –  FuhQ.gifFuhQ  ZDsig.gifZDsig Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 04:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  12. WHY IS THIS SO HARD EACH YEAR?!?!?!?! Oh, I mean, for Thinker, but damn, that's an awesome field of candidates.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
  13. For. His vote for me means a lot, but that's irrelevant. I came to this page intending to vote for him in the first place. --So So 09:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
  14. Dig. A difficult choice between The Thinker and So So. Sir Roger 04:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
  15. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH TOO HARD Can I split my vote up amongst Thinker, LedBalloon, Ljlego, Mhaille and Modusoperandi? Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN
  16. Symbol for vote Support This is the one I should be voting for. I like some of those articles he wrote. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [coolest link ever] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 14:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
  17. Quite possibly the best writer on the site at this time, though many others on this list have pushed him pretty close. For. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

edit TheLedBalloon (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 2 classic rock band ripoffs
  1. Nomination. TLB started out the year as a bit of a noob, but as time progressed his talent in writing became exponentially more obvious. He's composed two of the funniest articles I've ever read, Volcano and Heat death of the universe, and another whopping 13 features to boot. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 00:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. For Led knows what's going on. I haven't graduated from his adoption program yet, but I can tell you that he actually knows what "funny" is. I have had close experience writing with him (see Heat death of the universe), and he is not only a funny writer, but is someone who can explain why what they write is funny. I think that is the essence of someone who is the best writer of the year, out of some 60,000 registered users.   Le Cejak • <-> (Jan 1) 00:29
  3. Symbol for vote For. as per woah, what cajek said. Also, he's great on ?pedia too. Also, wut? Also,~Fag x FS

edit Ljlego (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 5jlego
  1. Nomination. Ljlego's got it all: quality, quantity, and cajones. He's got the highest article-to-feature ratio on the site and a total feature count of 22.5, a number rivaled only by the legendary Savethemooses. Plus, he's from Long Island. Who could forget such articles as Nazi, HowTo:Be a Gangsta, the iconic Chuck Norris, and my personal favorite Mad TV. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 00:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. For --Imperator█Dark_Apostrophe█The Memory Hole 13:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. For I've watched this Uncyclopedian grow from a young youngster to a youngster (sniff) and I'm so proud of the work that Ljlego contributes, and the ongoing quality apparent in it. Many of the other nominees are real Hall of Fame members, Ljlego should be the next to join you. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. 4. Lj's a talented writer who writes some damn good articles. --Sai Jack Phoenix, professional killer admin (Whine?) • (Wikia ♥ ads) 10:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. For. This was extremely close between him and Modus. Extremely close. I mean, I actually went back and forth, editing Lj and then MO's sections, drafting witty vote after witty vote and then changing my mind and having to write more witty votes for the other candidate. Then I played Tetris for about an hour. But after that it became clear that the best choice was Ljlego. He's hilarious, and he's got a boatload of features. I mean, Jesus, 22.5 features. I don't know if that's skill or luck or whoring or what, but whatever it is it's pretty goddamned impressive if you ask me. So yeah. Ljlego's cool and should win whatever award this is. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  6. For - I like statistics. I like funnies. I like Ljlego. — Sir Manticore progress-wheel.gif 12:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

edit Modusoperandi (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +11 Mad Cats
  1. N+F This has been MO's year, from an unknown Canadian to that pompous parade of odd letters you see trailing his signature. In my opinion, one of the most talented writers we have around, who makes not only top notch articles but also makes every conversation with him an "exciting" experience. Modus is my choice for the year, he deserves it, that handsome bastard. ~ Mordillo where is my BIRD SHIT? 07:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. For...I'm glad we have so many great writers to choose from, but I can only vote for one--Sir Shandon GUN (Talk) (Trophy Room) 13:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. For As per spinning Jew-star-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 16:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Whereas I cannot morally vote for a loose whore like Ljlego, I'm torn between so many of these other writers, so I have to say that this is a really tough decision for me. However, I must vote for MO because he's an excellent writer, Uncyclopedia's lead commentator on the Village Dump, and because I fucked his father in the ass. There's a video out on the internet about it. It's called something like "mrhands.mpg". Anyways, For. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 20:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. For. Per the above. He deserves this award. Give it to him. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:06, Jan 1
  6. For - I knew this was going to be a hard choice. Everyone who has been nominated is very talented, but Modus just edges ahead of the rest IMO. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  7. For -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 08:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  8. For --MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 19:15, Jan 6
  9. Symbol for vote For. - Hell yes, he's written some damn good stuff if you ask me...And well anyone else for that matter BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) Jan 6, 19:18
  10. Strong For. One of the few writers I know who can write just as easily with caustic satire as with patent silliness, he has consistently written above and beyond the competition. He's also written quite a few articles that have slipped under the VFH radar, but are brilliant nonetheless. (He's also one of the funniest posters around, both in forums and, it seems, even on VFH.) As Mordillo said, this has been MO's year. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  11. For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:41, 28 Jan 2008

edit So So (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +1 ...so?
  1. Nomination. Meet So So. See So So write. See So So write well. See So So write funny. He may have few features in comparison with the likes of Lj and Modus, but I think his consistent, awesome quality merits a nom, in my book. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:49, Jan 1
  2. Dig. I'm not going to delve into a long tirade on why I love So So's work, or why I believe he deserves this award. Let me just say that, of the people that I personally believe to have an innate command of comedic functions (especially subtlety), his name tops the list. And to me, that command is one of the highest benchmarks a humorist can attain. Everyone nominated here is already a champion. So So gets my vote. --THINKER 21:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
    Comment It kills me not to vote for my favorite Uncyc writer ever, but that's just how it goes. I'll always love you! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
And I-I-I-I-I-ee-I will always love yooooo-ooooo-ooooooouuu, oh! --Whitney Houston 10:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

edit Mhaille (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +7 Cheeky Scouse Chappies
  1. Nomination - he has twenty features under his belt. While he isn't getting my vote, he still should have the nom. --Æ 17:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. For. The Master. That is all. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. For He's sung, but not sung enough. Far not enough. ADDENDUM: I realize now that my reason sucks like a monkey on a popsicle, so read this part too. Mhaille is far more than a writer like me, who puts many articles out. He is far more than Modusoperandi, who puts out many good articles, and will occasionally help a brother out. He is far more than a writer even like Thinker, a man who I greatly respect and admire, who will reshape an article to better suit the high-quality standard we like to pretend to uphold. No, Mhaille is more than that. Mhaille is an always-brilliant satirist who takes his adaptable tone and will subtly apply it to others' work, also giving the authors tips and tricks of the trade. A true maker of featured articles whose count is far higher than mine and STM's combined when you count the uncredited features he helped build, he deserves this, and it's a pity he doesn't seem to be getting it. As the author of the article which inspired me to start here, Mhaille will always be #1 for me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. For. This year is fucking hard. I mean, I'm not nominated, which would probably make this vote even more of a close race in my heart, but this is still pretty damn hard. That said, Mhaille is the best, and always will be the best. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. For. He's been the most helpful person to me on this site.--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 20:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
  6. For - Yes, it's extremely late, but I had to give it a lot of thought. I was leaning towards Thinkerer, but to me more memorable articles were written by Mhaille. Some of my favorites include Oscar Wilde, Goa Tse, Hannah Montana (and some other Nazi stuff I liked), Shot your fuck up, Schrödinger's cat, etc. Not to mention he can come up with gold in a matter of minutes. Though I hate Noel Coward quotes with a passion, Mhaille's got my vote. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 14:33, Jan. 14, 2008
  7. Five UKer, meet E-stoner --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 13:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

edit THE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 1HE
  1. Nomination Who could forget about our very favoritest insane-o-zor? A guy who knows what he's doing and isn't afraid to pretend he doesn't, THE deserves a shot.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. For THE best person ever --Polystyrene Man 19:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

edit Uncyclopedian of the Year

edit 67.72.98.46 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 1

edit Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 0 homicidal amphibians
  1. Nomination, but withholding my vote 'til a bit later. There are so many people I wanted to nom for this, and TKF is definitely one of them. His talents stretch to all areas of work in the site, from welcoming new users to huffing and ICUing in Newpages. He even has time to write some amazing fantastic articles. His sysopping has only made him an even more helpful contributor, and I hope he continues as one of the most reasonable admins around. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:56, Jan 1
  2. For TKF has been around since time immemorial. He's been an admin since November. Trust in Frog.   Le Cejak • <-> (Jan 1) 01:24
    Erm, he has been admin since December. I know, I was in his inauguration. He wore light green robe with a very big cleavage. I know, it seemed strange to me as well at the time. ~ Mordillo where is my BIRD SHIT? 09:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. For A tough decision, and yet I am very clear on who I think deserves it the most. -RAHB 02:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Symbol for vote For. if it's good enough for Cajek, it's good enough for me. Also, I agree. Also, wut? Also, buttsecks? Also, ~Fag x FS
  • Comment! Everyone who voted for me should read this! I'm hereby throwing my base behind Algorithm, so if you love me more than the other guys, it's time for you guys to suddenly love Algo more than me. VOTE/EAT ALGO! --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 00:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

edit MadMax (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +18 ass-less leather pants
  1. Nomination and a BIG For. What can be said about MadMax? Probably very little actually, for a guy who quietly goes about the business of cleaning up all the crap on Uncyclopedia. For the guy who should have been made a sysop at least a year before he was. For the guy who is a one man army, organising, deleting cruft, he never sleeps. One of the few contributors that you can almost guarantee will have edited something on most articles on this site. Step forward, MadMax! -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  2. For No offense to the other nominees, of course, but I'm inclined to say that anybody not voting for MadMax has simply failed to notice all the work he actually does, and not just in 2007 (although he fully deserves the award for this year alone). In honor of his long, long history at Uncyc, unmatched in length and efficiency, Max had better win or I'm machete-ing somebody's dog or small child. —rc (t) 06:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
    Always the charmer...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. For. Although all of the nominees are extremely worthy, the sheer volume of work MadMax does is phenomenal, and deserves full recognition. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. For. The man with the single greatest volume of contributions to the site, and the true unsung hero of Uncyclopedia. So let's sing already. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Symbol for vote Strong For--Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 23:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  6. Approve. This guy deserves it more than anyone else. ~ Tophatsig

    Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

    1/01/2008 @ 23:37
  7. Dah! Does good work, is efficient, performs quanity, but with quality. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  8. For-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  9. For - Yah, and not just because I'm worried about what rc will do to my dog. -- Sann_sig_lights.gif sannse Sann_sig_tree.gif esnnas Sann_sig_lights.gif 11:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  10. For - Bastard beats me to the revert far too often. He's also a total mainspace whore. — Sir Manticore progress-wheel.gif 12:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  11. Symbol for vote EXTREME STRAIGHT FOR - Mhaille and RC say it all really, he does a hell of a lot of work that the rest of us are too lazy to do and never seems to let up BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) Jan 3, 13:49
  12. For ... quietly goes about the business of fighting crime on uncyc...and he's Mhaille-Approved!--Sir Shandon GUN (Talk) (Trophy Room) 14:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  13. For. As much as I want to vote for Algorithm, I never seem to go onto recent changes without seeing MadMax on it. For the sheer volume of work he does, MadMax gets my vote. Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  14. For - Yeah, I s'pose he makes edits here occasionally. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
  15. Hell yes —Hinoa talk.kun 23:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  16. Symbol for vote Definitely Among much else, even took time to thank me for my Cristmas card. --YeOldeLuke 04:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
  17. For I can't even look at Special:Recentchanges without seeing his darn name all over it. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 14:37, Jan. 14, 2008
  18. For. ~ Mordillo where is my BIRD SHIT? 14:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

edit One-eyed Jack (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 7-eyed Jack
  1. Nomination, but withholding my vote 'til a bit later. OEJ is a little bit inactive in the past couple weeks, but that doesn't change the fact that he has done some great stuff for the site. I know he's done a bunch of great stuff in VFD, but I mostly know him as a pee reviewer. In fact, I'd even go so far as to say that he invented the real review, the one that's actually helpful, and ushered in an age of extremely helpful reviewers. He has also written more articles about more things than I've ever seen. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:13, Jan 1
  2. Strong For--Æ 01:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Very Strong For • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 06:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. For per LedBalloon. I remember the olden times, when putting an article on Pee Review basically meant you were waiting for OEJ to look it over for you. Now that the tradition is distributed a tiny bit more evenly, we can finally acknowledge his amazingness. --The Acceptable Thinking cap small Cainad Sacred Chao (Fnord) 21:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. For my favorite non-op at Uncyclopedia.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 22:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  6. For ---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 19:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  7. 4 --DJ Irreverent 06:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

edit Algorithm (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 12 dog foods...
  1. Nomination and For. There are people like MadMax who do lots of little work around the site. Then there are people like myself, who do more noticeable stuff in bulk. Then there are people like Algorithm, who keep the site functioning. If not for Algorithm, we'd likely be stuck in 2005, and probably not even exist. He's done more background work and tinkled around in Uncyclopedia's circuit board more than any other user for the past three years; it's a total shame that he's without this award so far. Algo is a vital cornerstone of the site, and a damned great dog food, too. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 01:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
    Comment I agree with everything TKF said. Algo has contributed the Forum system, the <choose> extension and numerous other bits of now-used-everywhere Uncyc tech. I stand by my vote for MadMax, but if you must vote for someone else, make it Algorithm or else I'll piano-wire your wife or husband. —rc (t) 06:35, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. DIG Algo is my hero, and one helluva guy. Almost like Yanni. He kept this asshole around when I was very close to leaving. I hope Max wins too, because he certainly deserves it, but Algo is just quality people and the ratchet that keeps this place running like a well-oiled topless wrestler machine. --THINKER 16:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. 4: Al is one of the great unsung heroes of Uncyclopedia and until his song gets sung, I'll keep pushing to make that happen. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Strong For I want to start off by saying that this was one of the hardest choices I've had to make, and that all of these people would probably make a better president than any of the nominees. That said, Algo is, as TKF said, among the most hardworking, helpful, and all-around good guys of the site. We have him to thank for the wonderful new VFP system (which has sadly gone unnoticed, if one takes the quality of nominations into account), those things that rcmurphy mentioned, and being the only active admin on the site for the better part of this summer. When louder and more noticeable admins were contributing to the forum madness instead of doing their duties, Algo quietly took over, banning blankers, featuring articles, and moving this site along at a clip that never seemed to miss a beat. Without MadMax, we would have several more uncategorized pages, several fewer redirects, and a volume of edits that, now that we have them, is seemingly indispensable. Without TKF, we would be less several hilarious pages, thousands of unreverted vandalizations, and an all-around good user. Without One-Eyed Jack, Pee Review would be a festering hole of unloved crap, much of which is a chore to read. Without RDB, we'd see a lot less recent changes. Without Zombiebaron, we'd have a lot of trouble moving forward. But where everyone on this page is a recent-changes monster and revert-o-matic, Algorithm offers something more, something that puts him a cut above the rest. And that's why he gets my vote.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Yeah. Lj said it all. TKF is my close 2nd choice, but I had no idea of all the things that Algo did behind the scenes before this award; I've taken so much of it for granted. So yeah. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:37, Jan 7
  6. For Did I say I was very clear before? Oh, that was a lie. Yes, everybody here deserves this, though Lj seemed to say everything best. Algo FTW. -RAHB 00:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
  7. For, a scholar and a gentleman. Plus, he's good with the codeystuff. And no, not just Codeine's stuff. Other codeystuff too. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
  8. For TKF convinced me.   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 9 (02:48)
  9. For I agree with TKF.--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 19:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
  10. Symbol for vote For. as per TKF. Could I eat yew too? :P ~Fag x FS
  11. Symbol for vote Fore per TKF. I tend to agree with him here. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [coolest link ever] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 15:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
  12. For --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 02:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

edit Roman Dog Bird (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

  1. Nomination, but withholding my vote 'til a bit later. All over the site, from RecentChanges to Special:Random, RDB finds crap that has festered on otherwise-decent articles. He then purges that crap. For this reason, he is more than qualified to be up for this award. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:22, Jan 1
  2. Comment Unfortunately, it seems that there are so very many unsung heroes of Uncyclopedia. RDB is another one of these greats. His horn isn't being tooted quite so much as the rest of these candidates, but it deserves some. Toot toot. I'm tired, let's get some pork or something.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 04:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

edit Zombiebaron (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: Zomb1ebaron
  1. Nomination As Led, I'm holding off on voting. And for fun, I'm making things even more difficult when it comes to choices. Like it or not, Zombiebaron has been integral to this site that we love so much as this past year has gone on. Whether it be banning the 'tards that most people don't have the balls to ban, or being one of the two or three active admins on the site come August/September (and probably the most efficient of them), ZB has fully marked himself deserving of this award. Sure, he may be a little bit abrasive at times, but just like Famine before him, without Zombiebaron, we wouldn't be nothing.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
    Comment You used a double negative in that last sentence, Lj. I guess what you mean is that Zombiebaron is the root of all our problems.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
    Just my luck. I try to give my nomination a nice, down-home appeal to it and you come around with your fickle grammar and whatnot.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
    I told you that English was an idiotic language!!!! ~ Mordillo where is my BIRD SHIT? 13:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
    You did? I couldn't understand what you were saying. You're sure it was English?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. For Because of what I have seen in my short time here... MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 21:31, Jan 6


edit January

edit Writer of the Month

edit THE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 14HE
  • Nomfur Look man. He deserved it last month. He still deserves it. And as is the nature of all deserving winners, he won't win it for another two months. Alas, I begin my epic struggle to bring this award to probably one of the top 3 writers on Uncyclopedia. Viva La THE. -RAHB 02:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • for. because i never would have found uncyclopedia if i hadn't followed his instructions.--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 03:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • DIG oh come the fuck on you idiots.. --THINKER 20:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For I agree with Thinker.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 22:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • TEH! whoops! crap!   Le Cejak • <-> (Jan 2) 23:01
  • For THE not for president but because. --Polystyrene Man 19:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For. Was tempted to vote against because of Thinker's comment, frankly, but THE is just oo good not to get this (finally!) --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 19:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Well, like RAHB, I'm really sick of WotM being a popularity contest. File suit. --THINKER 21:38, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Look, I'm sorry, ok! I'm sorry I have beautiful clothes, a flashy smile, a too-cool-to-care attitude, and am universally loved by everyone! It's not my fault that I'm popular! I'm sorry I'm so damned cool! I can't help it, people just love me!! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:51, Jan 3
  • uh, ow.   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 3 (21:49)
  • Well can I PLEASE sit at your fucking lunch table already?! JESUS! --THINKER 22:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Antidisestablishmentarianism? --THINKER 22:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • It's really more of a yellowish suit, a bit like Keaton's in The Usual Suspects. /takes it to Thinker's talk page. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For He didn't win last time? Jeez..... - UnIdiot | GUN | Talk | Contribs - 21:55, Jan 3
  • It is a fucking popularity contest, and THE is very popular! now that was idiotic ~ Mordillo where is my BIRD SHIT? 00:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote EHT! isn't that a kind of milk? Also, for. Also, as per everyone else ever. Also, wut? Also,~Fag x FS
  • THE. My favouritest pre-noun--Moneke 08:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
  • I think I came up with something witty last month. Well, Zombiebaron should do nicely. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For. I was proud to do the honors in nominating one of his particularly brilliant news articles. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 07:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For. the writer of the month. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 02:34, Jan 28

edit Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 1

edit Gerrycheevers (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 7
  • With his guarantee thing, he wrote what I think is somewhere around 15 or so quality articles this month, a few of which of which were featured. A few more were quasi-featured, as Mr Cheevers has had some horrible luck on VFH. He is definitely deserving of some recognition for all his great articles. Nom & For. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:34, Jan 2
  • For - Now seems like the ideal time for Mr. Cheevers to win the award. Plenty of good articles in the last few months. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For. Wrote some good stuff last month. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For. Very impressing showing, lad. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 20:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For --Æ 21:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For- The Red Baron was great.--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 22:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote FUCK YEAH, MAN Ж Kalir hippies! yay! 06:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

edit Noob of The Month

edit Anakin (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 4 Atlanta citizens
  • Nomination Methinks he's done a fine job on Atlanta. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 01:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For - seems to be going in the correct direction. He's asked me questions as well as others and wrote a good first article--Æ 01:49, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For As an eligible n00b (which always helps when running for n00by of the month), and a fine n00b at that, young Anakin has won my vote. --THE 20:33, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Dig THINKER graduates another success. You're welcome Uncyclopedia! (Also, came for help, stuck with his work, and integrated advice into the piece very well -- couldn't ask for more from a newbie) --THINKER 20:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment in SUH-thun THA-eenks, GAHS! AH REE-luh a-PREE-shee-AYT it!--Anakin 04:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
  • 4 -RAHB 04:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

edit DJ Irreverent (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 10
  • I don't think Fag's going to reach consensus, so let's vote for DJ. First of all, he's on his way to a feature. Second of all, he is NOT a character on Full House. Vote for DJ!   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 11 (14:53)
  • For. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  • Ineligible - unless I am wrong, he did not write anything according to his contributions. UnTunes:I Am The Very Model of a Crazy Fundamentalist was written by Moneke--Æ 18:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
    • My bad, he's a friend of Moneke, and collaborated with him. Still isn't eliglbe--Æ 18:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
    • He is NOT ineligible, AE. He is under 30 days of age!   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 11 (18:17)
  • He needs a full article and he doesn't have one yet. Collaborations with other users don't count as full articles.--Æ 18:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Have written at least one "full" article. - that says nothing about collaborations, one way or the other. Me thinks eligible. -RAHB 02:34, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
      • According to his userpage, he's got two collabs, which should together count as a full article. Eh? Ligible? --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 02:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank you all... Damn, people already like me. I am writing some articles right now. Like this!--DJ Irreverent 05:46, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Bah. lucky bastard :P --Moneke 13:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For Rather than be bitter, I'm gonna give this to someone who also deserves it. ~Fag x FS
  • For. I've seen him around quite a bit, voting on stuff, picking up bad stuff to re-write, generally making loads of contributions and stuff (although some more judicious use of the preview button could be in order!) and generally doing good, helpful stuff. Anakin's contributed a good article, which is fine, but this guy's done loads! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For I've seen him doing some good stuff around here. - UnIdiot | Talk? | Theme - 16:28, Jan 20
  • For. ~ Mordillo where is my BIRD SHIT? 12:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 13:48, Jan 27
  • For. Good guy, funny, looks promising. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 02:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

edit Fag (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 2
  • Nom and For Fag's done a lot of work here for being only less than a month old (please god, say that he's not a month old)   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 7 (14:16)
Comment I'm pretty sure that I'm less than a month old here... but if not, may I remind you of my persistent arguing? I've spoke to many people about my belief that the limit for NotM should be bigger because people who join later in the month, expecially in the later half of the month will not win as in their time they will find people cannot win towards the end of the month due to nominations already having been long underway, and will not be able to win next month's as they will not have been able to contribute enough in such a short time, so are rendered totally ineligible...... That's just for the people that haven't heard this from me yet :P ~Fag x FS
Comment the month limit always seemed weird to me.   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 7 (14:49)
Comment I must apologise to you again Fag. I do not think your eligible under the current rules. By 4 days if I can count. That is harsh. Can someone please tell me I'm wrong? MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 15:01, Jan 7
Comment ...is, then, why I uphold my theory even more. ~Fag x FS
Sorry guys, MrN is right. Fag = Bummed. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 19:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to yew, as it seems the time may be increased ater all. See Forum:An issue with NotM. ~Fag x FS
Fag, four votes for, one of which are yours, are hardly consensus. Wait for an admin to settle the issue. ~ Mordillo where is my BIRD SHIT? 12:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Is it against etiquette if I self-for? Hope not... I might rectify it if that's consensus :P ~Fag x FS

edit Contestant (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 1
  • Nom and For - he returned from a 7 month vacation on December 11th and started a good article so he technically counts as a n00b? Right? Also, he said he wouldn't turn down the nom--Æ 00:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

edit Drama (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 0
  1. Nomination This user's flamewars have recently been nothing. Absolutely nothing. I spit on this user's flamewars. P-tooey!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
    a) not a noob. b) not a noob. c) fictional, mostly. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

edit Unknown user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +3
  1. He hasn't really been around longer than a month. He truly became active in either late November or early December, and featured an article in a short time. He deserves it.   Le Cejak • <-> (Jan 3) 03:24
comment - You know, I only became active in quite late November, but I imagine no sober person would nominate me again. Actually, even I wouldn't nominate me again. I'm just not much of a noob, I'm more an evil writer/mega whore. Rofl. --BlueflatcapsigMajor'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 03:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Be humble all you want, you're also ineligible anyway. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 19:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  1. He voted against my last article on vfh, I think, and therefore killed it, but I'm for--Sir Shandon GUN (Talk) (Trophy Room) 04:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
    Last contrib dates all the way back to June. Illegible. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 04:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
well FINE, killjoy--Sir Shandon GUN (Talk) (Trophy Room) 14:12, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
To say that I "contributed" back then would be an understatement. Sure, I rewrote the whole damn article on pancakes (and it still sucks), but the real question is what have I really done for Unc from that date? Any features? No Any pees? No Did I talk to any other users? No. All this happened 5 months later, in late november when my real noobship began, and I decided I liked Unc enough, that I asked leddy to adopt me. Soon after, BAM! my first feature the day after christmas, and a whole bunch of "Quality" reviews as per Cajeks standards. Not to rant on any more, but I digest, but isn't being in AAN automatically qualify me for NOTM? I mean AAN=Noob and NotM=Noob, so why can't I be a noob? What if someone came in here from ED and hit the ground running? Is he still a noob even though he clearly knows what he has to do to succeed? You should really look into deeper things instead of age based on first contributions, such as how nooby were they? Think about it.--Blueflatcapsig Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 20:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
First off, being in Adopt-a-Noob doesn't mean you can become Noob of the Month. NotM has age restrictions because being a noob is all up to personal interpretation. I've been around since August, but I still hardly do a damn thing around here. Five months later, I wouldn't be surprised if some (or many) people still consider me to be a noob. However, there is probably not a single person on this site that would even consider allowing me to be eligible for this award. What's more, I registered in March. So, like you, I registered, had a long period of inactivity, and came back. There have to be set restrictions, or every other month this award would turn into a flamewar over some newbie that thinks they deserve the award, while everybody else argues that they don't. Boomer_New_Years.png Happy New Years! Shouldn't I be partying? PEEING 21:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
That being said, let's not turn this into a flamewar over some newbie that thinks they deserve the award while everyone else argues that they don't. NEXT CONTESTANT! --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 00:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Contestant isn't eligible either. He already won the award. Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Meh, whaddaya say we just give it to Rc and call it a day? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:31, Jan 4
Hey now, I wouldn't turn down another piece on the mantle. Is that an innuendo? mayyyyybe Contestant buzzer Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
You know, I wouldn't turn down another NotM myself. Think about it. I've done almost nothing for the site since September-ish, then BAM! I'm active again! That qualifies for being a noob, right? right?! -RAHB 21:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

4 - Hell, I don't care, I'll vote for myself.--Blueflatcapsig Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) Jan 6 07:50

edit Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +0
  • Nom and For - he deserves this. What else is there to say?--Æ 00:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • NO! Why are you all giving up so early?   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 4 (00:42)
    Why?:Give Up explains the answers. Nuff' said--Æ 00:47, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
    I wrote that piece of shit article. I already know how to give up.   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 4 (00:49)
    Remember, kids. Every time you don't indent, a whale dies a horrible, bloody, painful death. Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:52, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
    Dammit Boomer, go review something! This is your mother speaking! (worth a shot)   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 4 (00:55)
    M...mom? You came back? Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
    Yes, sweetheart! Remember me? Your mom? I came back from the retirement home to tell you to do things for Cajek.   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 4 (01:14)
  • For having a tender moment with Boomer's mom.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Against - And please make it a bannable offence if you nominate this guy. --AAA! (AAAA) 08:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For And please make it a bannable offense if you vote against this guy -RAHB21:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment I seem to be making a pretty good run at Noob of the Year, and if that works out I will probably retire from NotM consideration at least for the near future. This does not preclude a 2009 Comeback Tour, mind. —rc (t) 23:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • FOR!-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 05:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Bah against. Also, stop it. Also, stop it. Also, stop it. ~Fag x FS
Comment that's not a spiteful thing, I'm annoyed ywr being nominated all the time for NotM even though there are thoroughly decent actual n00bs nominated each month. I voted for yew on NotY just to prove that point :P ~Fag x FS

edit Uncyclopedian of the Month

edit MrN9000 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +2
  • Nom & For N shuffles around, doing the little things that make this site not only good, but doubleplus good. N for... whatever this award is! Give it to him!   Le Cejak • <-> (Jan 1) 14:47
  • EPIC for he's one of the best writers and most helpful users we have at the moment. ~Fag x FS

edit Charitwo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +8
  • Nom. I'd like to call Mr. Charitwo, "the silent reverter". Even though the guy stays under the radar, if you check his contributions you can see that he is just about anywhere, boldly fighting vandals, spammers and blankers. Just to show that his efforts has not gone unnoticed. ~ Mordillo where is my BIRD SHIT? 12:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For - I've seen him a lot on recent changes reverting vandalism and doing useful things. Now he shall go noticed--Æ 12:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For! It was hard to decided between him and Techno, but Charitwo's beaten me to too many reverts recently not to vote for him. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 18:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For Per TKF/AE/Mordillo. -RAHB 02:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For If just on IRC vigilance alone, he's got most beat. All the time, I'm on minding my own business and he's like "Lj, this is going on. Lj, that's going on. Lj, vandal breakout." Fun, t'is.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For -- Gotta atleast support someone right. --NXWave 23:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For. A quick look at his contribs tells you a lot. I admit to not noticing him, but now I know I'm glad he's here! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • For --AAA! (AAAA) 01:06, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • AE told me to. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 01:49 7 Jan, 2008)

edit RabbiTechno (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: TenbbiTechno

edit Cajek (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +2
  • Nom + For - Over 11,000 contributions in 6 months. Crazy. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment Not for nothing, but virtually none of those edits have been "keeping this place tidy" edits. Several could have been condensed using the preview button as well. This isn't to take away from Cajek (substantially), but the facts should be known.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Seriously most of those edits were before I understood the pervwei button. oh shit ...uh anyways, don't vote for me. Thank you so much, Cs1987, but I really don't deserve this!   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 5 (08:57)
  • 4 He rocks! --DJ Irreverent 06:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

edit February

edit Noob of the Month

edit Luvvy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +9

edit Arotenbe (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +3

edit Anakin (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +1
  1. Nom+Dig The kid is definitely on his way. He did a great job with Atlanta and is now onto an UnScript that made me laugh. Got nommed last month and didn't make it, so here's the second bid. --THINKER 19:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Sadly, he's missed the cutoff by a few weeks (first contrib from middle of December) --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 21:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Feck. --THINKER 21:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

edit JGDross (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 3

edit rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 0

edit Writer of the Month

edit Mordillo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +3 vaguely sinister references that in some way smear Jews, because we're not politically correct. Also we're violently anti-semitic. Well, maybe not that last bit.
there you go you cheeky bastard. Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 13:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

edit 15Mickey20

Score: 18Mickey20 (finally, this joke makes sense)(or does it?)(no it doesn't)
  • Nomination and For. I've been a fan of Mr. Mickey for a long time, probably since UnCameron was featured in March of last year. Since then, he's been slowly but steadily writing fantastic, high-quality articles that always hit home. With six features so far (and a seventh likely on the way, straight out of the Poo Lit), 15Mickey20 clearly deserves this award. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 00:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • For. He's one of those people who's been having it coming, but don't write 15 articles per month, so their winnage isn't extremely evident. Makes me wish that Winstanley still wrote, though. Whatever the case, Mickey is a winner, and deserves this muchly. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 00:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • 4--Æ 00:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • For -- A brief look at Uncyclopedia:VFH/Featured convinced me that he's the man of the month. Also, somebody make sure that his rewrite of Paris Hilton gets FA'd after PLS. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:42, Feb 1
  • Dig Mickey is a credit to this site and a damn fine writer and humorist. He's also so fine that it does, in fact, blow my mind. --THINKER 14:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • For - I love when a bunch of Aristocrats fuck on video. Not that there's anything wrong with that. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 00:26, Feb. 2, 2008
  • For I didn't realize how much stuff that I enjoyed that this guy had actually written until this nom. Truly an unsung hero deserving of this award. -RAHB 06:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  • ForHe is of the enjoyment making much like (ah Ingrish) Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN
  • For - He's captured what's funny about David Cameron in a way that no one else has i feel. --Knucmo2 20:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  • For --THE 21:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  • For. I think the biggest testimony to the quality of Mickey's work is that I'm prepared to vote for him ahead of Mordillo. That surprised me, but Mickey deserves this. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 22:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong for. He's consistently innovative and it appears he doesn't write anything unless it truly adds something new to the site. Also, I think the concept of UnCameron subconsciously inspired several of my articles. --So So 15:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  • For - Like some people, I've been a fan since the days of UnCameron and Martina Hingis. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 10:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  • For. Just another vote and the scoring is perfect! ~Jewriken.GIF 15:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Fo' I was actually just waiting for 14 to come up so I could be the hero who made the score joke make complete sense. Also, Mickey, why don't you call me?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
  • for. i was actually just waiting for 15 to come up so i could be the jerk who ruined the score joke. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
You shchmuck! ~Jewriken.GIF 04:45, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

edit Uncyclopedian of the Month

edit Mordillo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +20 Jewish conspiracies
  • Nom + For. I suddenly noticed that Mordillo had not won this yet. Give it to him. Now. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 00:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • For. Unusually for me, I was tempted to self-for this month, but saw sense - I'm forever seeing Mr Dillo around, tidying, deleting, banning, making bits and pieces work better and generally helping to keep this place ticking over as smoothly as it can. He's damn good, and he's funny and approachable too. Give him this award. The end. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Jewish For--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 23:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Epic for not only does he help this site so much, he also does it in a friendly way, so everyone's happy. Let's make it the second Jew UotM in a row xD --~Fag x FS 13:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  • F♥r. He hasn't won this yet? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 23:00 3 Feb, 2008)
  • SHOMER FUCKING SHABBOS! -RAHB 07:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  • For. Antisemitism. The only explanation for why he hasn't won this. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 13:39, Feb. 5, 2008
I fucking knew it! Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 13:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
err...you just referred to me as a woman... Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 18:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
You aren't? Who have I been masturbating to all this time!??! --THINKER 18:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
TMI Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 19:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey man, they were (supposedly) your pictures, pal.. --THINKER 19:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Honestly, I thought that Mordillo said TIM, which of course presented more questions. I solved this problem by doing something else. The end.-23:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

edit Count of Monkey Crisco (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +2
  • Nom & For . I saw this guy a few weeks ago on recentchanges adding categories to images. Then I saw him the next day, and the next, so I decided to check his contributions. I saw a trend spanning months that contained heavy maintenance to improve the site, much like what MadMax is famous for. If you haven't seen him around, check his contributions to see what I'm talking about. Sure, he's not a "publicly known" user, but his contributions speak for themselves. Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • For. Holy shit, look at his contribs. That's commitment. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

edit Roman Dog Bird (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 0

edit Under user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +1

edit Charitwo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 0
  • N runner up in last month's competiton and he needs recognition --Æ 00:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


edit March

edit NOTM

edit TheMillington (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +1

edit Mightydandylion (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +9
  • N♥m && f♥r. My new favorite noob. He's so helpful over at Pee Reviews, writes some great articles, (one of which is up at VFH) and is active all over the site. I don't see there being any other choice. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:20 Mar 1
  • Agreed, for. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:22, Mar 1
  • For. Love his work on Pee Review. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 11:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • DIG When I respect a man's vocabulary, I think that speaks volumes. Oh, and he's another one of THINKER's n00b army, and I only take the best and brightest. Vote for this gentleman. --THINKER 16:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Against Having read the users The Man: A Primer and Something of a Call to Action I am underwhelmed. If it can be improved by the end of the month I may change my vote, but as of now I can't vote for the user Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For. Helpful, polite, thoroughly decent and seems to be settling in nicely. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 21:32, Mar 18
  • For. Looks like his guy has a great future at Uncyc. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 23:59, Mar 18
  • For Per the first half of Thinker's statement. -RAHB 03:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For He's excellent. Schmat-a!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:24, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For NotM this month, and RotM next month, being the most productive reviewer on site who hasn't won it yet (assuming SysRq wins this month). A great talent by the looks of it. –—Hv (talk) 26/03 14:15
  • Symbol for vote F☭R SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle

edit Tattaglia (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +3
  • Nom & For - He's my new favorite n00b. Seriously, you have got to check out Hostage Situation, that article he wrote was funny. --Nekami 15:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For- Just read HS, you're right, Nekami, hilarious!!-XOXOXO, Love ya! Sk8R Mp-1 Grl UnSis Dude Slut! 19:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Tattaglia is hilarious! Seriously read his articles! - Praveen

edit UOTM

edit Heerenveen (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 0
  • Nom Since he's been back, he has fast gotten back into the groove, QVFDing pages just as fast as I can delete them. On for a solid amount of time every day, he's a keeper too.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Most definitely next month. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 22:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

edit Under user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +4
  • N♥m && f♥r. Didn't win it last month, here's to another shot. Only reason I didn't vote for him last month was because that Hebrew was up. I hope UU wins this month, he's extremely helpful around the site, and he really stepped up to the plate with Pee Reviews after Cajek's mysterious disappearance. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:07 Mar 1
  • For /me Snowboards into the voting.. UU is one of the most useful and probably the most friendly and courteous chap it's been my fortune to encounter at Uncyc. Following on from the sudden __NOCAJEK__, and my switch to the more poopy end of the market, he has been holding the fort at Pee Review, as well as providing useful input all over the place. Some of his comments in the forums genuinely make me laugh out loud, and why he does not write more I have no Idea. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 13:44, Mar 2
  • FOR Very helpful pee reviews, genuinely friendly, and easy to work with. I vote for UNDER USER!!! Javascap 14:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For. –—Hv (talk) 6/03 18:20
  • NM Mext Nonth --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 08:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment UU is fast becoming UotM's So So. That means he will win eventually.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For Next Month I think he's swell. --OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN 14:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

edit MrN9000 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +22 thousand
  • Nom + For. This guy's a keeper. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 21:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong For Extra special, totally delicious, and absolutely British. All three things that I don't dislike. Plus the fact that he's a really useful helper to have around, always been a better poopsmith than me. In short, he makes most of us look bad. That's why he's got my vote.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
  • EPIC for as per every time I've ever voted for him on anything. --(sir)Fag!chat|pee|fail|vote!Icons-flag-gb 22:18, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Yep. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:20, Mar 1
  • For. Helpful, diligent, always around (unless he's snowboarding) and generally an asset to the site. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:36, Mar 2
  • VForD He virtually runs VFD and is a helpful guy. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 10:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Dig He's like V Week, only slower. And since V Week is evil, I sincerely appreciate MrN. --THINKER 14:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For Him and his ever-enthusiastic helpings out. -RAHB 07:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For - He does pretty much what I was doing a year ago. Except that he's better. And he has friends. /me cries. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For - What can I say, thanks to him, I'm NotM. /me hugs Cs1987 there, there, it's going to be alright... ;) -- DameViktoria Heart_anim.gif Icons-flag-gb - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 10:01, 6 Mar
  • For Winna right here --Orange Geuce Yum! 18:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For, I remember the first time he asked me if I could give him a job as my personal butler. Then he picked up some kind of shovel, and started doing something to VFD. I'm not really sure what I'm talking about here, but, rest assured, its probably a metaphor. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For, always doing good stuff. - UnIdiot | GUN | Talk | Contribs - 23:01, Mar 11
  • Hell yes - He does fantastic work over on VFD and is really helping clear out those crap stubs BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) Mar 12, 07:58
  • Five He's over 9000 --CharitwoTalk 03:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Hell. yes.   Le Cejak • <-> Mar 26 (23:09)
  • The best thing to come out of Bristol since.....shit, what has ever come out of Bristol before? -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Hea! Fags (tobacco I mean), chocolate and slaves! What more do you want??? Dam scousers... MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 23:27, Mar 26
  • For epic similarities. --MNM5150Talk Dirty To Me Failings 03:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote F☭R SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle
  • For Mr. N has been very helpful and friendly to this noob. --OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN 14:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For - Everyone else is doing it. It's a new fad! --AAA! (AAAA) 12:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
  • It's a new trend. ~Jewriken.GIF 20:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

edit SysRq (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +1
  • Nom & For SysRq has been helping me get the hang of this site, and for that, he gets a big 2 thumbs up from this n00b. --Sk8R Grl 19:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
  • FutureFag. For many many reasons. --(sir)Fag!chat|pee|fail|vote!Icons-flag-gb 20:54, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For But if he wont adopt me, ill tak it back. he seems pretty kewl. i saw a pic of him and hez pretty hot 2 lol LuvMuffin 02:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

edit Cool and Sexy Admins IP (most recently 65.173.104.12 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits))

Score: +1

edit WOTM

edit DJ Irreverent (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +1
  • Nom & For - He may be new, but his material makes me laugh. --Nekami 11:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Wow... I'm honoured. The others deserve it more though --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 06:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
  • We laugh with him sometimes, but mostly at him. Vampiregirl
  • Comment I will so vote for this guy once TKFeck wins this month or next. He totally deserves it, just a little later. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
  • FutureF♥r. Next month, this month belongs to Mordillo no matter what Squiggle says. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 16:25 Mar 6
  • Deserving Despite having plagiarized some UnNewses, this guy still has a knack for writing gud laffs.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 11:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

edit Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +8
  • Nom and for Surprisingly, this guy hasn't won this yet. Go figure. He co-wrote the excellent Pillow fighting, wrote the very funny Cream of the Crap winner Sergei Rachmaninoff, and the hilarious HowTo:Play Russian Roulette, to name just a few. He deserves to win, for definitely. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For. Having not made any promises last month, I feel TKF is an excetional writing talent and, like Squiggle, am surprised he didn't win this around September last year-ish. –—Hv (talk) 1/03 21:30
  • For. I decided to not be lazy for once and vote for something deserving. Zombieninja 00:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote Fogainstain. Yeah, I support not supporting the abstaining from voting for this user. Ж Kalir hippies! yay! 03:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
  • For HowTo:Play Russian Roulette really persuaded me. I loved that article.--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 03:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
  • TKF power, activate! - UnIdiot | Talk? | Theme - 01:12, Mar 5
  • For --THE 20:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • I always vote for the other Jew. ~Jewriken.GIF 09:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Next Month 4 Sure --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 10:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

edit Mordillo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +19 more 'dillos
I cannot tell you enough how flattered I am that you came back from the dead to vote for me :) ~Jewriken.GIF 09:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

edit April

edit WotM

edit Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 17KF

edit Cap'n Ben (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Errr...already got WotM in the past...~Jewriken.GIF 05:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
No rule against a second win. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 21:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Not a no, not a yes As the good Cap'n knows, I greatly admire his work. However, as long as there are fresh nominees to win the award (which there are), it should go to them.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the nomination, Froggy, but after thinking about this, I'm with Ljlego. While it would be nice to win now that there are more than three people voting, it's probably better that someone else has a go. I'm not sure if I can withdraw from the running, but if I can then I do. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

edit Dr. Skullthumper (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +6 M.D.s on meds
  • Nomination. Also one of my favorite writers, whom I've been watching since his very first stellar creation Kitchen Sink, a feature he whipped up as his first contribution. Sadly, due to inactivity, he has been unable to rightfully claim this award, but fear not! for he has started writing again, and with his reemergence of activity comes this nomination. Keep on truckin' Dr. S! --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 01:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Yes. Skullthumper is consistently funny. A dynamic sense of humor and a good personality set Skull up for a big win come November May.   Le Cejak • <Apr 01, 2008 [1:51]>
  • Next Month I promised TKF. Dr Skullthumper Definitely deserves this though. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 04:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Yersh - Kitchen sink and Ode to the Monotony of Life are two of my favourite articles here! --Knucmo2 19:00, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
  • No. Not next month. Not two months from now. NOW. Do it NOW. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 19:12 Apr 5
  • For, I'm sure he could write a better vote reason than this. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Indeed! An excellent Author with an excellent track record.Muzak 01:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • For He wrote the "Best article I've ever read." Seriously, Dr. S, I made that T-shirt I said I was going to make. It says "Vote For Monotony." It's not even up for any sort of voting anymore. On a side note, Dr. S consistently puts out hilarious stuff. On a side side note, TKF really should get this award. But Dr. S is edging him out in my personal preference for now. -RAHB 06:29, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

edit NotM

edit YesTimeToEdit (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: Y18sTimeToVote

YTTE's back in the race --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 22:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Uh oh... believe it or not, but looking back into this guy's contribs, his first contrib was from February 26th. He's ineligible! --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 17:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
    • IT TOOK YOU THIS LONG TO TELL US THAT?! Fuck, I don't care. I move to a motion that he be eligible anyways since he's already gotten so many votes. The point of NotM is not how well known you are in the first month of your Uncyc career, it's more about any new user who is helpful and I think YTTE deserves better than to have this taken away from him. He's done a bang-up job, and in my opinion is one of the more impressive noobs I've seen. Let's not ruin this for him, yeh? One exception couldn't hurt. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 17:45 Apr 26
It would hurt, any exception would allow anyone to win n00b of the month and automaticly become comander. Except for Rcmurphy. Besides, YesTimeToEdit can win many more awards such as UOTM and WOTM, so it ain't the end of the world. And if he's been here for say, two or three months. He certainly has experience. That's why I care. --The Improver talk • contribs • 18:40, Apr 26 2008 (UTC)
See, and I agree with you that it would possibly hurt the integrity of NotM. See the talk page. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:57 Apr 26
    • I agree with both of you. But unless we make the time limit 2 months (which I would definitely agree with), there can only be one winner. This has happened before: two good contenders both deserving of the award. Let's give it to both of them.   Le Cejak • <Apr 26, 2008 [18:59]>
I like that idea too. Let's take it up on the talk page and if no one has any objection to it I say they both get it. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 19:07 Apr 26



  • Nomenfore A very nice Noob, deserves my vote --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 13:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
YeTTiE? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Oh I see, with the "e" of "Yes" and the "i" of "time" (ooh that sounds philosophical) you can create yettie....I'm talking here, FAR TOO MUCH! - 03:23 4 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
  • Yes time to vote. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 22:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Yes. Already writing, has done some pretty good stuff around the site. Proactive, funny, not a dog turd. Three things I look for in a NotM nominee. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:43 Apr 1
  • Uv Course Very good job, YTTE.   Le Cejak • <Apr 02, 2008 [12:33]>
  • Oh!I can vote for myself apparently, well, oh is there meant to be a 4 instead of an "e" in the title thingy? Anyway... Thanks for the nom! - 01:39 2 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
    Well, sort of. There was before your vote. You should have changed it to a 5, I've changed it to a 6 - it's a zany way of doing the scoring. Woo! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 12:46, Apr 2
Oh right...zany. And don't worry Cajek has alerted me to the badness of whoring! I'm changing my ways, promise! - 02:13 2 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
Zany indeed, and who came up with that? /me checks the history Oh yeah, I did. =D ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:20 Apr 2
Well good for you, by the way, and I know this hasn't really got anything to do with anything, but are you still doing the pee for me? - 11:31 2 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
CHICKUH CHICKUH YEEEEEUUH!!! ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:12 Apr 2
Thank you Ljlego, my kneecaps are yours to split... - 09:14 2 AprilSir FSt. (QotF