This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Delete - Completely humorless. Like someone gave mentally retarded children LSD, and entered them in the "write the most random shit possible" contest, and then sprinkled it with redundant jokes about them being gay or such. Really, really lame. -Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 22:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete, again. But for the love of god... 15 ARTICLE LIMIT! --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete - It's not O-fucking-K. The Oblong Lobster 22:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Maybe soft rewrite tag it. There is some good stuff here, along with some dross. A bit of a tidy and it will be fine. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 11:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Don't think it can be saved Mulehunter 17:30, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Comment Have you actually tried reading it? I'll give you an extract just in case "Rich in history yet curiously bereft of modern culture, Italy was announced to be the No. 1 best-selling foot garment of 2004 by John Woo & Ralph Lauren." ...
and sorry for the 15 rule thing...I thought Quack was "inactive" (I'm new don't hit me) Mulehunter 21:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry about it too much. I'm sure they'll let you off this time. Just keep an eye on the number of articles next time :) (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 25, 09:47
Delete. Let's see... random, namedropping, terrible pics, dodgy writing and terrible concept. Dammit, I don't get the prize. I like prizes. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 09:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Blow it up It's sad because it might be possible to write something funny about Austin, but not until we do away with this crap first. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]MUNCMNSF@H (drivel) 23:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete - per Bonner and I agree with OpenFaceSurgery--SirManforman 23:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. One of those injokes I never liked. We already have WJU, and that should be more than enough acceptable vanity for everyone. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete per the rest of the delete votes, plus some in-jokes are plain stupid--SirManforman 20:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Comment Isn't this supposed to be an injoke? I think it's described on HTBFANJS as vanity, but an example of good vanity, so it stays based on humor value. It's also mentioned on Worst 100 Uncyclopedia In-Jokes. And above all else, it's been nominated for deletion three times, yet survived. That's classic! Maybe it just needs to be cleaned up. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 17:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Note: This article's been on here so damn often it's not even funny. Go root around in the archives if you don't believe me. —Hinoatalk.kun 03:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I hate it however, I'm starting a new campaign: keep articles that people will probably look up and edit. Also, what kind of encyclopedia doesn't have an article on feet? -- Le Cejak•<-> 16:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Several good lines are sadly washed over in this garbled, unformatted mess. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete Per Lounge nom. I actually think this idea has a certain amount of potential, but the article witters on about some totally obscure local team for far too long in vanity stylee, and it will probably never get reworked to something decent. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 09:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete It should be "sore loser" of the year, anyway. -- Le Cejak•<-> 16:04, 24 October
Shame-faced keep. Per the above. "It may just be vital biomass oxygenating the planet to you, but it's home to me!" --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. I've had it with these motherfucking AAA clones on this motherfucking Uncyclopedia. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 17:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 17:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
There exists an esoteric programming language called Ook, although I don't know how correct the "code" in the article is. I'm generally in favor of deleting the other "AAA clones," but this one could possibly be kept if trimmed and verified. Pentium5dot1 04:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. I've had it with these motherfucking AAA clones on this motherfucking Uncyclopedia. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 17:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 17:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete - I just saw this and absolutely had to VFD it (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 23, 14:49
Delete. Sweet Jesus on a pogo stick, that's one of the most horrendous lists I've seen in ages! --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 15:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete - What in the name of bloody hell... (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 23, 14:13
Delete. Unless I missed something, this is relentless drivel. I don't think I missed something. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 15:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete This crap makes me want to throw up!! YUK! ElassintThrow things at me 21:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Per good idea nice layout. It needs more Jokes. Micro$oft jokes are classic. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 22:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Meh, there's a lot worse out there. It's not very funny, and there are a few spelling mistakes, but it's inoffensive, and probably deserves a visit from the rewrite brush. Whether it will get one is another matter... --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep YAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ElassintThrow things at me 21:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete --SirManforman 20:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments
I suggest an ICU.--Jtaylor1 21:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
I think you're confusing ICU and QVFD. You wouldn't ICU an old article during V-week, you'd V it. Hence the entire point of the {{V}} template. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 21:12 Oct 23, 2007
Keep and expand. The first set of thesaurus lists is kind of nice -- "titty" -- and the idea is soundly satirical. ----OEJ 15:41, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Per OEJ. There's a good idea here - although it needs a tidy up, and a significant expansion. I might pop this on my "if things suddenly slow right down at work" list. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 09:17, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Rondom uselessness. "Wierd Al was part Transvestite, part Ham eating zombie, and part horse smoothie machine". Indeed. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 11:20, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete I tagged this as a medium rewrite, but only because there wasn't room on VFD at the time. Now there is. --Pentium5dot1 04:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Strong Keep What the hell is wrong with this article? The only problem I saw was lack of a picture. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep Bad, but not bad enough for deletion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byMugka (talk • contribs)
I have tagged the article with {{AAP}} per Sawblade5's explanation. I think the article was VFD'd previously and didn't really improve, but let's see if anyone is willing to clean it up this time. Pentium5dot1 01:09, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete And what part of this is about a sandwich? --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 22:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Huh? No idea where this came from. No concept, terrible execution. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 09:29, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete, per Lounge. This was nominated last month since it was still a Work in Progress, but it's awful. It's about a Pokemon character, but a character from the Sonic the Hedgehog series is mentioned a couple of times for some reason, and it refers to the subject in question as an "emo", which is stupid. --Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete I have to sick my Pidgeot on this article and blow it away. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 22:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Über-What The Fuck? I hope the last thing this article sees is the word "Über" written 9 times in the VFD archives. -- Le Cejak•<-> 22:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete And redierect to shitElassint 22:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC) BAGEL
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy Keep Its a CRP page. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 23:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Recreated deleted material, (you guys are probably aware this was previously deleted via VFD) and this is identical to the deleted version. I placed it on QVFD several times, and it still hasn't been deleted. Delete and CVP--SirManforman 23:00, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Deleted per "Previously deleted on VFD and no changes" rule. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 05:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Super Strong Del Taco WTF is this. The only joke I saw in there was a lame kiddy Toilet Joke. —The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 21:59, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. One look at the trivia section should be enough of a warning, although I did read the rest in search of an idea. There wasn't one. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 10:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 18:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Pretty crap, I think. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 02:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain...good idea, but needs revision and pictures. ----OEJ 15:31, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Abs. Like the idea, wan t to keep it. Hate the article, want to delete it. Having a small yet entertaining between these two forces in the confines of my skull. Abstaining until there is a winner. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 09:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Now what am I going to put in my sig? --Kip > Talk•Works•• 00:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Nevermind, I found a replacement. Just click the pumpkin! Is it a trick, or a treat? --Kip > Talk•Works•• 00:42, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
I thought Kip was mooning me with a big orange butt. That's only because my mind is in the gutter most of the time. -- Le Cejak•<-> 02:06, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
gahhhhhhh Too bad I don't have the time to fix all this crap, so someone please delete it and let someone to write a better article. Deepinfoood 02:24, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep Surely deletion is a bit harsh? All it needs is a fix up. --Grue Hunter 10:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep, innit? Often added to, parts often rewritten. If someone did a full rewrite it'd be fine. RabbiTechno 10:37, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep Ahh come on y'can't get rid of this. It's not that bad. (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 21, 20:23
Keep - I think it just needs a cleanup. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 02:42, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Innit. This site has enough good British humor already. No room for bad! --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:36, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
STFU and Keep it I thought this article is good in the version that I look at. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 07:07, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Redirect as per TKF. RabbiTechno 10:32, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments
This is closed, by the way. I just created the redirect, so it looks like it's open. Don't let that fool you. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Seems like a bad idea, not at all encyclopedic, but it made me laugh, and not at how bad it is. Needs a tidy up though. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 09:47, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Weak Delete It's vaguely amusing, but at the end of the day it pushes all of the wrong buttons for me. Gratuitous namedropping, while in context, is rampant. Also, too reliant on "THEY'RE DEAD" for laughs, which I didn't laugh at. Plus, the fact that it's already been done, as well as the fact that I don't like it. Therefore, I say delete.-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 14:45, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Its not that bad. It's a vaguely interesting idea, not shabbily executed, there's a couple of decent lines in there, it's not too random, dumb, listy or whatever. There are far worse articles than this. Maybe give it a rewrite tag, but I can't see why this should go. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 09:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep. Deserves a stay of execution. RabbiTechno 13:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
