This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
MEGA KEEP!!! - I would definitely refer to this article if I wasn't an honor student... -- 23:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Bring This Article to school and get kicked out - I don't see anything stupiud here it is actaully one of the funier articles here in Uncyclopedia. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 00:17, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
I adopted the article 3 days ago and I put up a construction template. Why not give me a chance to finish it before we try to delete it? Jab 21:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Comment - because we already have a similar article--SirManforman 21:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Comment - Those articles are completely different. Jab 21:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
This article should have been ICUed not VFD'd. It's only 5 days old. The Oblong Lobster 21:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Comment - I VFD'd it because I thought it was to similar to HowTo:Skip School. As the author pointed out, it is a different concept and it had a construction tag, so I removed the nom--SirManforman 22:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Reading the two articles may have given you some kind of clue as to whether they were similar or not. You keep nominating articles and then striking your vote. The Oblong Lobster 22:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. "Necessarily existent" - how? There's no requirement for it that I can see, and it's awful. If we do need an article on Shipman, much better could be done than this rubbish. Get rid. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 21:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete so I can have a reason to purge every reference to it on Uncyc. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - It's in the "Translation" series of articles. If you want to delete one, you should list all of them, because they are all basically the same. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
We might as well, since they're all short and they all suck. --GeneralInsineratehymn 20:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Old stub --GeneralInsineratehymn 13:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
DεŁετε--SirManforman 13:35, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete I don't get it. If this belongs in another Uncyclopedia then move it to the greek one, otherwise just delete this one. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 14:11, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Howdy Ho! When I heard 'poople' I immediately thought people made of poop. I didn't think of it as a color. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 20:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Nothing worth salvaging. I would normally ask for this to be redirected to Emo or Elmo, but since I can't decide which is the more plausible typo, just delete. Pentium5dot1 20:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Hasn't been edited since '06, short, stubby, the only humor is in the poorly formatted "useful phrases" section, French jokes are gettin' old, delete. P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 06:10, Sep 30
Delete. Been reviewed. Found to be crap. Advice given. Author has done nowt since. Kill. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 12:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Hey, I've got an idea. If you think it's sucks, good news--it's a wiki. Edit it and improve it, you lazy arses. Yeah, there are a lot of links: it's called a satire, maybe you've heard of that. I think ubiquitous linking is comical. If no one else does, then fix it. And like Cs1987 said, it's relevant to the subject: all the post-rock fans I show this to think it's a riot. I don't think this is a great article, but the topic itself has potential. It didn't exist before I got here. User:Aleatoric 08:11, 01 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep Linking makes it look ugly. But some of it's quite good. A cut above deletion I would say. But who am I? The Oblong Lobster 20:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Should be the next against the wall after "Godspank You Black Dildo!!!!!!!!" <3 .talk.work.?pedia.
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 18:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Invalid Links, too many. -- 17:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments
With regards to Aleatoric's comment; I am a huge Post Rock fan too. The problem is is the article is utter shit. If an article on Post Rock is to be created then it should be called this. Thx <3 .talk.work.?pedia.
Keep for a week per ICU See comments below page. I placed this here to even out the votes to make sure is not acidently huffed to early. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 01:38, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep Well, it looks like the crusade has begun and it's only a matter of time before the wave of deletion reaches my SGBF article. Still, before PHK gets eaten by grues, I'd like to note that "kitten huffing is sooo overused" gig doesn't work. You guys seem to forget that new people come to Uncyclopedia every day - so kitten huffing is still fun, and making articles based on it isn't wrong in any way (Or maybe I missed the moment when Uncyclopedia turned into a private humour site). I agree that Ratmaster made a bit toooo many articles - Non-Huffable kitten the Movie and Adventures of the Non-Huffable Kitten have to go, right now, along with Non-Huffing Machine. Still, deleting NHK and PHK articles - tad too much. As I said before, it will screw up a lot of worthy kitten huffing articles. I'd like to receive some HowTo: Save a page to your userspace, since the kittens of various degrees of huffability are a notable part of my own article. Erratic Communist 09:08, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I'm going to get people to help on it, and I hope that I will have enough people to help on the Non-Huffable Kitten to get it back up soon. -- 17:22, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete--SirManforman 22:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Stalin, Samus and Master Chief in the same sentence in an article about Kitten Huffing. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
What is the point of trying to save my articles? You deleted the trunk so you also removed the branches... I hadn't even been able to save my other article and the conversation was not even finished... Screw it. -- 22:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Comment - I VFD'd it because I thought you weren't coming back so you wouldn't be able to finish it. --SirManforman 22:39, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
What do you mean I wouldn't finish it and which article are you talking about? I have been having personal problems so I can't spend 24 hours a day on Uncyclopedia and I have other websites to manage and my computer has been bugged of and I get a BSoD every 20 minutes. -- 22:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Comment - than don't post messages saying on your user page saying I'm out. A quality article has been destroyed....--SirManforman 22:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
That was the fact that you destroyed my NHK article, how am I supposed to finish this article when you deleted the article this one branches off of? -- 22:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
OK Ratmaster, this is my final comment. I did not destroy your NHK article, it was an administrator, and a majority of the people voted to delete. --SirManforman 22:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
You basically did by nominating it... And the fact that it was only a day, the article had many more supporters. -- 22:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Nobody cares, stop taking the internet so seriously--SirManforman 22:57, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
I know people who care, and I still didn't get my other question answered.-- 23:00, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Say, you know what's a great way to get this page and others kept? Flaming at each other through VFD! Yeah, that'll do it! OR, you could read this, perhaps take a look at this, and get busy. P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 23:15, Sep 28
I don't mean to flame people, that's the last thing I want to do, I just don't see why the other article was deleted when it was just started to get Keeps and the fact that someone whom I had a conflict with voted delete (and continued to flame me just before the section was deleted) and there wasn't a chance (or a good gesture to) explain how I could get the article to stay, and I had read the other guide articles before. -- 23:23, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
(Outdent) Could you guys please take this to one of your talk pages if you want to continue arguing? -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 23:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I was swayed by the two above--SirManforman 15:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep How many articles is Manforman going to nominate then change his mind on? What's the point in nominating them? The Oblong Lobster 16:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete--SirManforman 14:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep I don't normally like articles that are what the title is. And all I find amusing about this is the fact that it is long, but I still say keep. I think some of the 'very's should be replaced by long pointless prose. Same with the binary. The Oblong Lobster 23:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Can't Get Rid of Something That is filled with so much content. -- 17:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
This article is now so long that it has reached the point of absurdity. Delete before it gets worse. --GeneralInsineratehymn 21:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 00:13, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Sit on it Fonz' Checked history, its total crap and possible should be moved to Wikipedia, BTW don't forget to {{VFD}} tag the article --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 01:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Oy! Jesus has to be rolling in his grave (er, cave) with this many poseurs. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:17, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 16:20, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Oy! Jesus has to be rolling in his grave (er, cave) with this many poseurs. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:17, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 16:19, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
It's filled with suck and shit. --GeneralInsineratehymn 13:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete --Kip > Talk•Works•• 13:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Londonistan which is not to be confused with Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, Pakistan, Ontario, London, France, Londoninium (aka 'Facking Laandaan',or Londrone,... oh my god shut up article! Le Cejak•<-> 14:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Nomination I'm really not sure about this one. This category was created back in February during the controversy of who her daughter's father was. But in April they found out Larry Birkhead was the father, rendering the joke obsolete. We could just change it to "Men that claimed paternity...", but at this point it's just old news. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 04:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete yeah sure, old joke. Le Cejak•<-> 05:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Slaughter - Unfunny, short, pointless... NEXT! Erratic Communist 09:10, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments
I moved this to my user page but I don't think I did it right, did I do anything wrong? Link: Non-Huffable Kitten, The Movie -- 11:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep. It could be redeemed if someone would take a few minutes to retool it and either add to it or delete the crap that's there. We shouldn't give up on entries so easily. --Captain Finding Nemo 08:56, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete--SirManforman 22:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Geez We've already deleted North, South, and East Virginia. Remember that Christmas letter about how horrible the world would be with no Virginias? --Kip > Talk•Works•• 05:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Make it not exist, as it completely ruins the effect of typing in "This page does not exist" to the search box, and having This page does NOT exist appear. Let me be clear: It is just the redirect I want to disappear, not the article it goes to. I'm a purist, and would nom the latter article for VFD, except that it was a winner of PLS, so I think it should be moved back to The nonexistent page, which was its original title, rather than huffed. Yes, I am expecting this to be argued on heartily, get me flamed, shunned, probably banned, etc. Bite me. EugeneKaywuzhere(whinethank)18:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)