This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Keep it ...Naked! Not at all horrible enough for deletion. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 05:07, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I worked on it for a while. It's been edited and pee'd a bunch of times. It's good. It could use some improvement as the last PeeReview suggested though.--SirManforman 12:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
The real draw, however, was that George Martin edged out Phil Spector as producer of Let It Be...Naked! Hasn't been edited in a long long. -- Le Cejak•<-> 05:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Nuke it I just don't get it. Anyway Nom please put the {{afd}} tag on top of the page or this AfD voting will not count. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 11:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Okay, I see what yer saying.Le Cejak•<-> 05:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Did you guys notice that I removed my nomination? If someone else wants to renominate it, go ahead. Le Cejak•<-> 14:52, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete, no need to have a stub article on something that can be already covered in Non-Huffing (which, by the way, needs some love) article. Erratic Communist 09:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep, as per MadMax. Remember that most of the people on this site are not regulars, and just come to look at inside jokes about things they know. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep Seems like a strange nomination to me. The Oblong Lobster 11:44, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep MadMax swayed me--SirManforman 13:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete - to many external links, not funny, and is plain stupid. OK, I'm done VFD'ing articles for tonight--SirManforman 22:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. Having grown up in Rhode Island, I admit there are a lot of inside jokes in the article that might be lost on other people although the page doesn't really seem that bad that it warrants deletion. As it stands, the article has some real potential I think and could use some revising although the absence of the Big Blue Bug and Buddy Cianci among other topics, is disappointing. Also, as the guilty party responsible for adding most of the "references", I can remove them if that makes a difference. MadMax 23:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Joan of Arc, Three Musketeers, Juozas Statkevičius, Red Cloud, Myndė, Albinas, Akira Kurosawa, and Crazy Frog all say Against --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Week Keap I don't know, I thought it was a good concept. If it gets huffed I'm going to move it to userspace and try to expand it. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 06:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Vindicate, merge and cleanup. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 02:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep by order of H.R.H.H.R.Clinton. Sir Roger 04:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep I am still working on this article, I still think that it can be a great article. HerrSimp 01:25, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Good faith WIP. But HerrSimp dude - reduce the size of some of those images please! --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 13:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep,
Have Mayfair work on it. --GeneralInsineratehymn 00:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. The concept is there, but the rest needs a major overhaul to get anywhere. Of course, there's the OTHER alternative... this! --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Clarification: We also have The USSA, so two articles would be redundant. If fixing up or rewriting one article, the other would work better, as it's much neater. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Inquiry: Was that WiP added before or after I put this on VFD? --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
It was initially added to the article by the author, although the tag was removed prior to nominating it for VFD. MadMax 23:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
What's the joke? Characters are switched for other characters? Is this a road map of Greece? Why am I asking so many questions? SirModusoperandiBoinc! 00:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Ahhh I get it...No I don't. Delete. The Oblong Lobster 23:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Medium Delete. This is just one big political joke about the pope :\ pfff, it could be way more relevant (there's not even a proper page about Pope Benedict!). Also, it's had that "steamroller" template there for a very long time. Good things are: last edited 2 weeks ago (by an ISP), links to lots of places. However, I think this page deserves a fresh start with an editor that doesn't care about the pope... cuz all it is is an unfunny image whore. Oh, catholics molest children? I've never heard that one before! -- Le Cejak•<-> 13:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Comment, as you may have gathered from its placement in the comments section.MrMetalFLower, ICU's can only be placed on articles less than a week old. (I made the same mistake when I first came here.) –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 20:06 Sep 26, 2007
Nevermind I'm rewriting the stupid thing. Even with this one paragraph it's better than a whole g*d damned page about how the pope looks like palpatine! WTF IS WITH MY SIGNATURE?? WHY DOES THE DATE DO THAT?-- Le Cejak•<-> 01:03, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Kept. Nomination withdrawn. MadMax 23:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete--SirManforman 11:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Unreadable. An article has to be pretty good to be successful at parodying bad writing. This one is not successful. ----OEJ 16:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete as nominator - It should be obvious why this page is of poor quality (for example, the first sentence reads "Write all of your notes on this page.") If this is deleted, consider turning Note into a disambig. Pentium5dot1 23:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Kent's DNA was fused with the toaster, transforming him into the warrior of justice he was known as today. - This article can suck my hairy jiggly johnson. -- Le Cejak•<-> 22:30, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I disagree with Manforman. I believe that it was inspired by his cat, not about his cat, therefore, it isn't vanity. The only bad thing about it is the drama it caused. --SirStarnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 00:11, September 28, 2007
Keep - While the article indeed is turning into a pile of random stuff, deleting it will harm a lot of kitten huffing related articles, not to mention that it actually has a lot of potential. I suggest a partial rewrite. Erratic Communist 15:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Strong Keep - Why is it VFD? This is real funny and has tons of potential. UserSlavemaster2 28 September 2007
Delete
Delete - the author quotes "I created the Non-Huffable Kitten based on my cat", so it's vanity, and it sucks--SirManforman 21:15, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Its influence has been very negative over the weeks to the point of causing drama. You know what I mean. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Pretty much all of the humour is just randomness and namedropping. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 01:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity or not, it's basically random, name-droppy stuff. No real humour to see. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Based on my cat... I meant the color scheme... Why the hell don't you delete the rest of my articles? The page is a PR 4 and is very popular... -- 00:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Dude, from your userpage and talk page it looks like you've taken this one personally. Why not take the advice from the Pee Review and re-write it? Ah well. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Yes, well I did take this personally because I had added the page to a lot of conversations and linked it to a few things, it is big and this was the only thing that made me want to stay at Uncyclopedia. And the fact that someone who had an argument with me is voting "no" without even adding a reason, which is why the arguments before started on the same article. -- 21:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. OK, it's an unfunny, kinda random article about a corruption of the name of one of the dullest places in the UK (Weston Super-Mare). What's not to hate? --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 15:53, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
I hate it already -- Le Cejak•<-> 19:10, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
KIIIILLLLLL!!!! --THE 19:41, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
No female was created on Mars but a Spaceship from Jupiter had a Princess from the Planet who was Daughter of the Emperor of Jupiter. I rest my case, your honor. -- Le Cejak•<-> 14:10, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
I think this article needs to be tweaked to include more humor revolving around the show The L Word rather than Will Smith and various UPN sitcoms. --User:BaylorBoy/sig 22:18, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
DelTaco - I went looking for sound and all I got is this page. It seems to have been a work by an anonymous author and has been abandoned. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 06:39, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
fatties and boobies --Kip > Talk•Works•• 06:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Grand Crap Delete-to. No, wait, that sucked. Plain Delete. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I gonna have to say keep on this one. I felt that this page was funny and alot of work was placed into it to create some Redeeming Value. This isn't stupid like the GTA New Orleans one is. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 06:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
KeepUm, you "delete" guys aren't Canadian, are you? SirModusoperandiBoinc! 21:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Vanquish - Quite a few of our hundreds of GTA pages are bad. This is one of them. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 05:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Grand Crap Delete-to. No, wait, that sucked. Plain Delete. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
If you haven't seen a show called "Trailer Park Boys", there is no way that this page will make any sense. Not this page. VFD never makes any sense. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 21:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Vanquish - Quite a few of our hundreds of GTA pages are bad. This is one of them. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 05:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Del Taco - Same reason why GTA New Orlans should be dumped. This one is stupid compared to GTA Sunnyville Trailer Park. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 06:45, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Oh yes, let's go on a GTA related delete rampage. Most of the pages wouldn't be missed. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:46, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 00:17, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Grand Crap Delete-to. No, wait, that sucked. Plain Delete. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Comment Can't you ju$t delete thi$ your$elf Zombiebaron, no que$ion$ a$ked? --Kip > Talk•Works•• 06:53, 27 $eptember 2007 (UTC)
No, because it was previously kept on VFD. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 09:14, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Comment: Con$ider (1) a redirect to Money, (2) a redirect to User:MoneySign, or (3) a disambiguation page containing at least the two previous items. Pentium5dot1 23:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Comment - can't redirect to MoneySign because it would than violate our vanity policies--SirManforman 17:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Worthless Pokeshit --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
"Vulvasaurus", known to close friends as "Froggy". I deny any relation whatsoever. Delete. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Pika Pika Enough with the pokemon. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 00:40, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
This is so disorganised and lacking in any real attempt to be humerous. The only subversion is the gender. The Oblong Lobster 23:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
delete. Very towncentric. I'm from MA and don't get good potions of it. And it sucks. It's not like it's that hard to make MA funny, is it? P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 21:40, Sep 26
Delete. I was tempted to QVFD this one, but I must control my murderous ambition. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Vanquish - Vile, vacuous. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 02:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete: Underdeveloped, with no discernible idea: it appears to be nothing more than a paintball gun. And no pics. ----OEJ 01:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Strongly keep. This article is much comedic! So DON'T DELETE!!! Pika8888 09:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Strongly Keep. This article is a satire of Philippines as a whole, and is hilarious to most Filipinos: just google the reactions - and also take a look at the discussion page. You are correct that it is unfunny if viewed by a non-Filipino - but you have to consider that a satire of any nation (including the article on the United States) will be unfunny in the eyes of a foreigner, just as a joke about anything for that matter will be unfunny if you are clueless about the object of the joke. Its like getting rid of all the British humor in Uncylopedia because Americans don't find it funny, etc. We have to take into consideration the readers of the article who knows the country. Lastly, it is not racist because the whole article was done by a Filipino. --Gilgal1(Talk to me bitch!!!) 14:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete, libel to crash a browser if its not careful. Also, terribly unfunny. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 00:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Baleet. This is actually even more racist than Kramer. Very unfunny. --RandomDie 00:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Vanquish - Long and messy, mostly unfunny. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete Even though the main contributor is Philippino, and the page has undergone thousands of edits. It is hopeless. Sir Roger 05:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Awasin Needs a major rewrite after deletion. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 09:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)