This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Keep Not brilliant, but I don't understand why this has been nominated? The Oblong Lobster 11:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete - this article was written by Cheeseboy, an infi-banned user, and it would not be able to get it's proper help--SirManforman 12:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments
It is not good, nor is it funny. While this could be turned around, the author has been infi-banned for a month and thus it wouldn't be able to improve--SirManforman 20:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Then rewrite tag it, and it may get picked up during conservation week. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. i fixed the links a few days ago, but i didn't VFD it because i wasn't sure if it was terrible or i just didn't get it. seeing this here confirms that i am probably not an idiot. maybe. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Well, I had a look at the Wikipedia link and agree with the initial point, but this article is random and dumb. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 21:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
*Week Keap On the grounds of the many red links throughout the site that may lead to vandalism. We can delete after the rewrite. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 22:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep on the grounds that you'll incur the wrath of the plebs if this gets deleted. --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:17, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep, unfortunately. It's a list with a lot of really dumb elements, but like a stained, leaky toilet it is a fixture. ----OEJ 00:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep and pray to God that someone eventually rewrites this crap. Deleting will probably just result in an even worse rewrite. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 05:42, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep unless you got something better - it's an old classic. Which is to say, not brilliant, but well-known and linked to. Contain if someone writes a better version. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 14:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I've contacted Ljlego to ask for a rewrite; he's working on it as soon as he's finished Chuck Norris. Give it time. --AAA! (AAAA) 03:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep -- There are tons of other unfunny articles you guys can mess with. But not this. --Omb 08:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep But needs a re-write --(Bonner) (Talk) 13:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep I laughed until I stopped. But every time I come back, I laugh again. Leave it alone, I say. What harm is it doing? --warhead 14:00, 3 September 2007
Delete, I've attempted a rewrite, and it's not getting any better. It is very listy. There is some humor behind the rough list however, but most of it is jokes about how fat your mother is.--SirManforman 22:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Yo' momma's so listy, her article got huffed. Listy. Awful. Needs a rewrite, but in the meantime, kill, redirect to something, and protect the redirect to prevent vandalism. When somebody's got a rewrite they're happy with, then it can be moved in place later on. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 22:02 Aug 29, 2007
Delete --Kip > Talk•Works•• 00:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Kip, a red link is not a good reason to delete. Why not redirect to Your Dad, which is not awful, and than protect the redirect. My rewrite I was working on, just won't work, and a better writer needs to handle it. --SirManforman 23:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
I will change my vote if you promise to fix the double redirects after deletion. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 23:21, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep. "ie" & redlinks notwistanding, it's not crap. Also, Canada is a speed-bumpless haven. They have pot holes instead. With real pot, too. I've said too much. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 17:43, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep If you can't laugh at buses swearing...then...ehhh...dunno. The Oblong Lobster 17:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. If nothing else, the use of <sic> in the article is wrong, bad, and obnoxious. He/she/it/they mean ie, of course, but even the correct interjections are not needed. ----OEJ 00:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Oh yeah, you're right. Sorry about that. ----OEJ 00:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Why does Sbu vote to keep every single article on VFD?--SirManforman 14:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Her heart is filled with love and joy. It's true. My heart, meanwhile, is several sizes too small. That's how it's supposed to be, dammit. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 17:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep - It's short but is a concept piece. Obviously, its concept doesn't please this month's delete voters, but oh well. --Ogopogo 03:59, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep - 'Tis an interesting concept. I've changed my mind, this doesn't really need expansion. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Why? People have to read the article to vote on it, and they can see for themselves how bad it is. --Mitch 01:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Yes, but that doesn't give an excuse for people to use "200Xcruft" as a deletion reason. Not giving a reason at all is better that saying 200Xcruft, because 200Xcruft does not say anything about what exactly is wrong with the article. Also, there are many genuine 200Xcruft pagesthat will not get deleted, which again implies that 200Xcruft is not a sufficient reason for deletion. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 03:25, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Dexter ... Looks like you forgot something. As the rules say: "Add vfd to the article in question. Failure to do so may invalidate the vote." --Ogopogo 21:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorted that out for you --(Bonner) (Talk) 13:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep, surprisingly. I think y'all are being too picky. It is an interesting idea, and it doesn't rely on memes. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Late last week, I fell out of bed and bonked my head. Well, I was pushed, actually. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 03:41, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep and link into the Uncyc timeline somehow. Don't see anything wrong with it. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 15:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
*Keep - If this article to be deleted, might as well delete all the other article about races or religion.--Mikididi 17:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Conditional Keep - If the article doesn't get any funnier sometime soon, might as well delete it. --Omb 18:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
*Keep - This article is should be keep for re-editing --matrempit 18:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Humourous racism...without the humour. --Mitch 01:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Urk. Delete + CVP. This article will never go in the right direction. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
I am the real Megatron! --Roman Dog Bird 01:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Racist, random and crap in most other respects. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 12:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete Agreed with TKF. CVP as well --(Bonner) (Talk) 13:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete There has been very little progress int he right direction since VFD tagging. The above "keep" votes are by people who have not helped the article fix its problem in any way.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 13:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Sannse made the point that this sounds like a lot of vitriolic, anti-national rhetoric. Discuss. --Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 23:44, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
The less said about the drama going on at talk page the better. MadMax 23:58, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
I knew this will come sooner or later. I already told them to keep it funny and not just utterly disgusting. I honestly admit that while some parts are funny, most of them are not. --Omb 08:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Poorly written and lots of rancorous remarks. Either rewrite the entire article or delete it. --Mircohard 04:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
CLOSED It's abundantly clear that this page isn't going anywhere good. Delete, CVP'd until a time where a [i]good[/i] article can be made.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 13:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep, as its creator. If this gets the axe, I'd like it put back into my userspace --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
ADDITIONALLY: I don't see why people make such a huge hubub about "AAAAAAAA!" clones, when in reality, we only have a very small handful of them on the site. At least mine is different from the others, too (thanks in part to the Doc) --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 14:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
I fucking love it --Roman Dog Bird 18:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
PARTY HARD!!! --Dexter111344 23:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
KEEP If you can't PARTY HARD what can you do? Literally, what is there left to throw your dirty soul against? Come on!! The Oblong Lobster 21:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep, purely for the use of random colours. •Spang•☃•talk• 12:07, 30 Aug 2007
Well, I'm a big fan. Stole your random colours and your timestamp sig bits. Sorry. Someday I promise to make it up to you. Maybe I'll give you half my soul or something. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 00:26 Aug 30, 2007
PARTY HARD --PARTYHARD 00:12, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
:O Keep! I think its fantastic --(Bonner) (Talk) 14:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Repetition can be used for comedic effect, but it must be used with other techniques, or it just gets repetitive. In other words, it just gets repetitive. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 17:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
I was bored of all my WiPs and felt like mainspacing an article for once >_> So sue me! --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Fine. I'm sure having a username proclaiming your murderous and green tendencies won't look good to the judge. I don't care if it ain't easy bein' green. My lawyers will have a field day with you. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 02:55 Aug 27, 2007
Don't pretend you can outmaneuver me in court! I've scrutinizingly memorized every line in Pink Floyd's The Trial, I'm legally invincible! --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
The problem with "prose" that just repeats itself over and over is...there is one joke, and that's the repetition. AAAAAA's joke is repetition. I look at the page, I scroll down and see it's all the same thing...and I just click off to another article. Repetition is so fucking fucking fucking repetitive it doesn't even rate a slight smile anymore. Not interesting. Not even slightly interesting. ----OEJ 23:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. See Rescue Patrol on Wikipedia for a reference. We DO NOT NEED articles on heavily advertised fad toys and children's TV cartoons. They are teh stupid. ----OEJ 00:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Random and stupid. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 05:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep, despite the norris at the end. This would do well with expansion. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete One of the oldest pages. Not that funny. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 01:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. I my change my vote if it is expanded. As it stands nearly every possible joke suggested by the subject is avoided in favor of a two short paragraphs of maundering and a bad Norris. ----OEJ 12:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete - It could be expanded, but I doubt that it will be within the next week. At the moment it is far too short and unfunny. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 03:18, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Comment The Chuck Norris thing wasn't so bad when this was first written. You must realize that back in 2005 and early 2006 the Chuck Norris jokes were still fresh. --Kip > Talk•Works••
Yeah, like any meme it's funny at first...or it wouldn't have made it to memehood. But at this point we ought to go through and cut out all the irrelevant Norris references. The meme is stale. ----OEJ 23:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep - This isn't very funny, but it has the potential to be a good satire. Perhaps we should rewrite tag it. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Changed to Strong Keep per my new paragraph. :) SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 03:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Flaccid keep. I've never encountered this - the internets, you say? I'll give them a try. Can you get them on slide-rules these days? --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 15:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Very weak keep --Roman Dog Bird 18:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete She was a wrestler, but this somehow only has stupid-ass, made up DBZ jokes. But... DBZ was actually good, unlike this. --Dexter111344 00:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Just the usual stupidity: "...raping neighborhood cats and children...". I put on the VFD template, Bonner can send me a virtual beer sometime. ----OEJ 00:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Gahh sorry about that :( I should really pay more attention to what i'm doing. /me sends OEJ a virtual beer --(Bonner) (Talk) 14:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep as per Under User, but leaning towards the other side. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Weak delete. MadMax has sorted out most of the red links, and there are some OK ideas in there, but I can't see anyone being bothered to make much of them, and it's not strong enough as it is. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 10:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep Could probably use a tidy, but there's some of Ye Olde Humoure in there. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 00:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep Not that bad. Sir Roger 07:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep per SbU. --Dexter111344 19:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Ye olde keep. ~ 20:38, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Not too bad, plus it actually has a Snakes on a Plane joke that isn't completely stupid and unfunny. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete - If the ICU on this gets removed one more time I might just have to kill myself. If we do not get rid of this now, the ICU will probably be removed again. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:54, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Although that is the most times I've ever read the word "Yeti" in one day in my life. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 15:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Man, it's a good job it's a nice sunny day, or crap like this would really kill my mood. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 15:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Yeah, it's random, but it's also kinda funny. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 01:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep I either love it or I hate it. I'm still not quite sure which - when I skim read it it looked awful, then I read it all and thought it was great, and now I'm just confused. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 00:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep The guy in the song sounds creepy. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 21:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Awesome He sounds so fucked up. --Dexter111344 23:42, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep UnTunes is a bit different to mainspace on stubs. Kinda like UnPoetia (which could do with its own namespace too methinks). I think this is pretty normal for UnTunes! -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 09:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep. It sounds like Violent Femmes, acapella. Also, I've got big hands, and I know I'm the one, apparently. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 04:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Stubby, not funny--SirManforman 21:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep but tag stub not expand, as expand gets things deleted if you're not careful. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 08:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
tag with re-writeSir Roger 06:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep "It also has an interesting property which makes you YELL the next word you say afterwords. It is unfortunately underused on the Internet." -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 08:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep. I don't get it, why is Manforman trying to rape that Alphabet template? --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 13:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep I don't feel write deleting this while keeping the rest. Also, it's been on VFD for about 3 days without anyone bother putting the VFD template up, which kind of makes it ineligible... --Dexter111344 19:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Now, this is a poor keyboard article. ----OEJ 01:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete This is the only one that is SHIfT out of the keyboard articles you put up here. --Dexter111344 02:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. I was going to say keep because it would be the only red link on the keyboard. Then I noticed > is already red. So it will have company. Shift out of luck. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 12:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep and tag British. Combines making fun of Glasgow accents with apologising for slavery, two of our favourite pastimes. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 08:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep Tickled me and would have been amusing at the time (and UnNews should be allowed to get dated surely?) -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 08:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete
It's one line, and in severeal attemps to QVFD it, it failed because it was to old, I don't see satire and think it should be deleted--SirManforman 20:35, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Yes, it's schoolcruft. This page (of schoolcruft), however, has some merit. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
There is no cabal... --Dexter111344 02:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep One of the better schooly ones, in that I understand what it's going on about and laughed. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 08:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Nom and Delete. needs to be huffed despite excellent use of the word 'halcyon'. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
I keep suspecting there is a small cabal involved in writing articles around and about Pontypridd. A small cabal of students who like the Ponty pubs. But they are too clever for me to figure out their IPs and whatnot. Or, rather, I am too stupid and lazy to put any effort into it. ----OEJ 01:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep better to expand these keyboard articles than start again with new stubs. They will eventually be reasonable collaborative efforts. And I ate lice every day in Japan. Sir Roger 06:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Since when did we care about copyright violations? I don't believe this is a copyright violation anyway.
Err...no it doesn't. Wikipedia is based on factual articles. This isn't an article, and it isn't particularly factual either.
Most of the information on all Uncyclopedia articles is false.
I don't believe it's feeding trolls.
BJAODN will be remembered long after it is deleted. If it is deleted, it won't render TFAODP obsolete. That's like saying we can't write articles about Hitler because he's dead.
Ah Cs1987, this is a joke nomination based on this. Yes, Nobody Cares if it's a copyright violation, but reading the Wikipedia discussion, everybody is talking about that. That was a flaw when I said most of it was false, I meant was true. Also, this may not fail UN:NOT, it fails UN:DUMB. The rest, is your opinion, which I encourage you to have, but how would this be a parody if it was deleted at Wikipedia? --SirManforman 13:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Kp I lik this. Th ltter in qustion is alrady dltd, which is why it is so funny. Sriously. --Dexter111344 01:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Kp - Not too bad. Keyboard pages should only be deleted if they are really crap. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 05:49, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep Really makes me appreciate the letter E. Think of people in poor nations such as Bosnia and China that have none. Sir Roger 06:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
2002cruft, Kip? There's no such thing... And let's not use "Old" as a reason. It implies all old things are bad and need deletion(which is wrong). It is that fact that this is/never was funny, and the author(more than likely) wasn't even trying. I almost voted keep just to spite you two. --Dexter111344 21:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep since we have articles on all the keys of the keyboard. But I'm getting sick of seeing that moving picture with the kid. Sir Roger 05:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep - A classic expansion of a classic in-joke. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 05:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep ...WITH SAVINGS! Also, previously VFDed, but still here. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 08:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Comment if you look at the discussion, everyone who participated wanted it deleted, yet it remains, and someone was too lazy to delete it apparently, because I see no logs of it being deleted, and/or hacked up by STM. ~
Delete. It's simply not funny. It's just poor. It's absolutely poor compared to STM's other works. He's better than this. Like we need another near direct copy of the most worst article on this site next to Snowman and Fisher Price. Maybe the starch on my tweed jacket is getting into my brain, but I'm not loose with these in-joke knockoffs, or the in-jokes themselves for that matter. ~
sigh OK, I give in. I've looked at the Euroipods talk page. Euroipods was the greatest controversy that wasn't, sorta funny because it was the least funny featured article in history. But still, I'm not going to vote to keep either. ...and I'm not afraid of Savethemooses. Well, only a little. Sir Roger 05:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
<sarcasm>"Oooo. Look! I wrote a page on how much a band, or person in a band, sucks! No one but me could ever thing of such a thing. I'm so special!"</sarcasm> SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 00:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete but please no more images on VFD just because they're unused - you'll fill the place up. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 08:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure this is a re-created page. I know I saw it on here before I got a chance to see what was actually on the page, but if it's the same material that got it deleted in the first place, well......... Roman Dog Bird 16:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Got deleted in the past. Thrice.~ 16:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Four deletions doesn't seem to warrant a CVP in this case. Someone is always gonna wanna make this. Therefore, all of you chaps should get together and make a good version of this page before the vultures come back. Or get Ljlego to do it. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 16:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete on same ground y'all deleted OVER 9000! but this isn't funny(OVER 9000 was funny...) --Dexter111344 15:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
The main article is containment quality, and if it isn't rewritten should probably be contained. The category needs to be deleted. Danny deserves a better article than this - it's just a compilation of jokes from the videos text-form with youtube videos plaster on that don't make sense as mere text. ~
Delete. Pointless category and terrible article. Oh, was I supposed to swear? Er, big jobs. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep because it's so soft and furry! And because it's used on certain animal articles. Sir Roger 07:32, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Completely worthless template, as it's just an unclickable image. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:09, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete the godaweful template, but Keep the image. I've placed the image in my userspace for amusement like I did with Template:Television --Kip > Talk•Works••
Delete. If it is used on some animal articles, and is as such needed, I'm positive someone (else) here could knock up something better than this in a few minutes. This does not deserve to stay. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Just occasionally, I wonder if the people who write this kind of random drivel actually find it funny, and expect others to. Then my thousand yard stare kicks in. Delete. What's next? --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 12:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Really stupid 2005cruft. Most of the article is random crap completely unrelated to him, espicially the Super Friends. Delete. --Dexter111344 14:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Emo band crap with some randomcruft and name-dropping. Why not CVP and protect it from being created ever again? I hate emo stuff. HATE HATE HAT!!! --Dexter111344 14:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Despite the fact that Dexter called Avenged Fucking Sevenfold emo and I was tempted to vote Keep just to spite him, this article just isn't good enough to merit that. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Meh, they may not be emo. They still suck. I was thinking of some other band. I think I had been thinking of Angels and Airwaves... --Dexter111344 15:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Don't be ridiculous, Gerry Adams is hardly an obscure nobody who shouldn't have an entry. Remove the "delete" and replace it with a hard rewrite. --Zarbag 08:06, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep Has the odd funny bit, if a little random, and as a bonus manages to be relatively inoffensive, something I don't imagine we'll see on the next thousand rewrites of this article. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 10:33, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete - another one that seems to have been VFD'd then put back up again. Some edits since then, but still awful. Sir Roger 00:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC)