This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
"Gary Coleman then rushed to his bedroom, where he donned a pirate costume complete with a wooden broadsword he had receieved eleven years earlier as a Arbor Day present from his cousin Egbert. Egbert happens to be a huge fan of the German National Rollstuhl (wheelchair) Fencing Squadron. This is not relevant to the rest of the tale, but the world needs to know." I agree... But the Controversy and Celebrity Endorsements sections sucked. Keep. --Dexter111344 14:23, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete I missed an ICU removal what with all the darned vacationing. Tsk. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:42, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Crap. Perhaps I should make a small edit to my .js to help with the prevention of ICU removal... SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 03:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete Gloriously incomprehensible. Sorry, I meant golruioyls iocpmnrsehblie. Translated from somewhere I think, and could be good, but I can't really work it out... -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:07, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete - I don't know how I missed this one, considering that I made about 250 edits on the day it was created... SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 03:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete as nominator. I realize there's a {{rewrite}} tag on the article, but nobody has been able to come up with any substantive improvements for the better part of a year. Pentium5dot1 22:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Deleted Now unused, although it took some doing to get rid of that userpage from it. Also, an approves category, which I figure no-one'll miss. But argue if you like. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 21:49, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Old random stub --GeneralInsineratehymn 20:09, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete The him-her thing would almost be alright if there was something else to it - but there isn't. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 21:42, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete But contains one idea for anyone wanting to redo this: "More recently, they [Woolworthses] were dropped by the Luftwaffe during the Blitz onto major English cities. This backfired somewhat as the chain began to revitalise the slowing economy." -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
This fifth vote means that Sbu won't bloody well recreate pages that I've deleted. Got it? -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 23:18, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
It's no more or less crappy than anything else we get on here, and deserves more than two people's vote against it. I'll let it go now because it's had this many. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep I believe the point is that it's meant to be someone trying to write about vacations while actually tripping. It could be a little more vacationy, but the basic idea is good. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 11:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Yeah, it is a good idea. WOW! That abstract painting on the wall is staring at me... SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep After re-reading - the writing is good enough to be made into something; though it's still not particularly funny. I liked the part about Cinderella. Sir Roger 06:26, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Towncruft, bad in most respects. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 05:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete Schoolcruft wrapped in towncruft, like some kind of unholy sandwich of doom. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 09:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. "Getting to Bangor is as easy as creating the nonsense I am writing on this page right now" - at least they admit it. Terrible. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 10:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 02:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete One good line to save for posterity: "Her disastrous marriage to David Gest fell apart when he insisted she stay in a glass house with his other Memorabillia of Judy Garland." -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 08:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 00:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Fucking kill it I didn't even have to look past that Samuel L. Jackson quote. The rest of it is probably as horrible as I can imagine. --Roman Dog Bird 00:35, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
WOW WHANT AN AMAZING SHOW SO COOL AMERICA LOVES IT WOW AMAZING? CORNFLAKES --THINKER 00:42, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete What amazes me is why people old enough to know about rape and etc etc still watch children's television. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 11:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete No TKF, haven't you heard the rule: I before E except after "what happen when a dog and an otter love each other very much"? -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 10:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete A former ICUed UnNews that sneaked back in via userspace without being changed. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 00:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 00:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete Another formerly deleted article re-created and edited somewhat over time - still bad. That concludes my tour of the first 14 VFD archives searching for stuff that should have remained buried long ago. Sir Roger 00:56, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete Nice writing style, but random and vanity. Also, well done Roger for doing another of the somethings I've never got round to. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 10:40, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Context is critical. If you follow its link, you'll see that it's listed on Untoons. In turn, that has it with the caption "If not for the napalm attack, Mr. Chuckles would have birdied.", which is pretty funny, if you're into that sort of thing. Again...context is critical. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 18:35, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Black humour is still humour in its own right. If this is to be deleted so should that famous Tet offensive picture Mhaille made. --~
(abstain) As Mordillo notes, the younger among us may not automatically recogonize this as an iconic image of Vietnam. It was a Horrors of Wars meme before the word meme even existed. Its not a pretty picture, but the monkey could be black humor. One could argue that the photochopped pic grits its teeth and laughs in the face of horror...what else are ya gonna do, sit there rocking back and forth and crying? That's one way to look at it, I suppose. There are other valid viewpoints. ----OEJ 14:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. I think it's a vanity page starring teenage friends possibly named Cliff, Phillip, and Diego. Most of the content is of the "who cares" variety, meaning it is irrelevant and uninteresting to anyone except the vaniteers. ----OEJ 14:52, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete I didn't even have to look past the quotes. Roman Dog Bird 15:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Destroy --GeneralInsineratehymn 15:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Nom and DeleteRoman Dog Bird 21:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Starts badly, gets worse, often random, always unfunny, and finished off with lengthy lists. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 21:16, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete with extreme prejudice. This article is utterly, stupidly vicious. I Googled around to see if Allen was a pedo or was accused of being pedo. No, he isn't. So this article is just braindead assholery by anonymous IPs with tiny, filthy minds. ----OEJ 01:02, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete Horrible. Sir Roger 01:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete - although the fact that the usually level headed OEJ hates this so much should alone be enough evidence for deletion. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 13:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Voters may have to check the article's history to get the VFD nominated version; someone seems to keep wanting to blank the page. Sir Roger 01:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Nom and DeleteRoman Dog Bird 21:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Unfunny, just about how hot another anime character is. Multiple Chuck Norris references. Put it out of its misery. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 21:14, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Badly written mangacruft. And we have way too much of it already. ----OEJ 01:06, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 01:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
CVP Re-created page, being ignored on QVFD. Roman Dog Bird 21:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Strong desploy. Recreated pages are by far my least favorite. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. CVP, then release the hounds to locate and destroy the perpetrator. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 11:02, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
CVP - People who re-create crap articles suck. They should all be banned for a long time. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 12:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
CVP, then ban the user who recreated the page. --GeneralInsineratehymn 15:46, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Contains same material I removed before I decided the page wasn't worth shit and put it up for deletion a couple days ago (or was it last week? I don't remember). Roman Dog Bird 21:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
It will just be re-created again. I figure with those people who insist on re-creating their articles, if banning doesn't work (they can just find another computer), it's best to leave the article for a while, then try to delete or re-write it in the future - there are quite a few articles like this, and I imagine most of the authors forget about Uncyclopedia after a while. Sir Roger 01:14, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete Looks like an attempt at flourishing about a hotel some student stayed at. Not funny. - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 18:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Nom and Delete - I dont find it funny in the slightest, the images are stupid and un-captioned and there's certain innapropriate comments about Hispanics and Arabs in there --(Bonner) (Talk). 17:44, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 00:31, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity? Bandcruft? Random? Definitely unfunny and packed with pointless imagery. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 19:55, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
As the picture said, WATCH OUT ARRON CARTER! Oh, wait, that should read AARON... Guess they didn't think it'd be noticed... --Dexter111344 20:14, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Even though he is the most awesome being in the existence? ~ 17:42, 16
Delete Agreed With TKF --(Bonner) (Talk). 18:37, 16 August 2007 (UTC) August 2007 (UTC)
Delete I was going to vote keep. Then I came across the fun facts which I strongly argue are not..actually...really...fun...The Oblong Lobster 20:52, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete PLEASE, this article has entered into cliche territory, and is badly formatted. It needs a total rehaul. - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 17:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
I believe this article is in reference to its author User:Fronz. I'd suggest simply moving it to his user page, although I believe he's been inactive since 2005. MadMax 04:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
