Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive83

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Galactic Stalkers after Hikari

Keep
Delete
  • Nom and Delete Roman Dog Bird 14:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Was stupid-ass vanity and a list of random unrelated-people with a bunch of quotes. Now, it's just plain stupid. If you want to write a list, then might I recommend you look at some funny lists. Take most of the Worst 100 lists. Most of those are very funny. Your list was just stupid. There. I'm done bitching. --Dexter111344 17:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete If I paid better attention to my watchlist this wouldn't have lost its ICU. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:44, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I have nothing to say about it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete it to death. And do the same to the guy who created it and whatever other vanity articles he's done. -- Hanyouman 19:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This article, is bullcrap. Sorry for my bad language, but we should have all realized that we could have added a little of this crap to the Hikari page. Then we would be all happy. Mostly, some Malak something guy was making the article. -- Ineedaname 18:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • The page has been vandalized recently, but there's no point in reverting it, just go and look at what it used to be. An unfunny list. Roman Dog Bird 14:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Deleted Because it should have been if the ICU wasn't removed. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Television

Keep
  • Dunno why, but I found this kinda funny. Perhaps the betamax part. Keep. Even though the channels are messed up. Everyone knows that Fox is 13, NBC is 7, and Comedy Central is 61. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep I find it's crappiness hilarious. If only it could look crappier. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Keep Not so bad. Sir Roger 07:43, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep (of course, I created it - sorry if you think it's awful, but I thought it refreshing) -Tritefantastic 04:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete An ugly template whose purpose is already served by {{UnMedia}}. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Yecch! Looks more huge and dated than the Betamax itself. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The CBC is always Channel 2. It's the only channel we get. Canadian remote controls only have Power and Volume buttons. True story. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Ugly and unnecessary. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:38, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Is this even used? Because this is the first that I've seen it... It serves no purpose whatsoever, just like the BetaMax in my shed... Also, I don't get CBC cause I live in the States(sucks for me). --Dexter111344 18:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sorry, even "so good it's bad" can't save this tripe.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Make mine a delete, if somebody includes the rest of the good channels into the UnMedia template and volunteers to take all the inclusions away after it's deleted. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
What about the television category. Isn't that enough? If that's too much, how about a telev category? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Sir Modusoperandi is right: CBC is always 2. We even get two shows: Hockey Night in Canada and The Hour. But it's not the only channel. We also get CBC Francais at channel 3 (which can be seen on the back side of the T.V.). Sir Roger 07:43, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

All that I requested has been done, and the consensus told me to delete. So I did. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Plan 11 from Outer Space

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Imageless, short, and unimaginative. Short story shorter, this is unneeded, and indeed, unwanted.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Never says what Plan 11 entailed, which may be the joke. If so, it is not well done at all -- misses nearly all openings to satirize pointlessness. ----OEJ 19:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete As above. Its just bad =/ ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:21, 01 August 2007
Comments

Scottish sushi

Keep
  • Weak keep I'd say de-expand actually - get rid of the technical stuff and it might be better. I'm voting thusly mainly because I might have a look at it a bit later to see if something wonderful can be made of it. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Not a bad idea. I've gotta try that recipe sometime. Yum! Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:32, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep An interesting idea. Needs a rewrite template. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Passable but maybe move to UnCookBooks with a rewrite? Sir Roger 07:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and move to UnCookBooks as above. Needs very little work IMO, just some more links and a tiny bit of UN:PS Personally I really enjoyed this. And no Ljlego, I'm not just voting Keep to spite you :P ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:19, 01 August 2007
  • Keep if moved to UnCookBooks only. If it isn't moved, then delete it. --Dexter111344 21:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete Pseudo-factual, unfunny, and a non-notable, not-worth-salvaging concept. Some may say {{expand}}, perhaps, but consider this: would we miss this article if it were gone?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I assume it's supposed to be some kind of comment on Japanese whisky. RabbiTechno 17:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I may not be Japanese but this article still offends me for some reason. --Dexter111344 17:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:52, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments

D

Keep
  • Weak keep Some funny bits, if a little random. Also; I know it's a pathetic excuse, but it would make a big redlink hole in the middle of the keyboard! --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:56, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete Another crappy D-related article. This one is just a long list of words with minimal content. Plus, Undictionary:D is quite long enough already.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:21, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Semi-coherent rambling, for the most part, and underdeveloped. ----OEJ 19:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Destroy Dis Doo-Doo Dip da Dip 19:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • -elete --Dexter111344 20:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I was hoping to read a tale about a drifting tofu delivery boy. Instead I read this random whateveritis. Even Itsuki wouldn't think this was cool. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Worth re-doing Sir Roger 07:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. 5 minutes with a thesaurus and no imagniation. --Under user 12:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and let Ljlego work his magic This one is just listy-badness. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:59, 01 August 2007
Comments

Alamance Alfred

Keep
Delete
Comments

Goldbach's Conjecture

Keep
Delete
  • Old stub that makes no sort of sense whatsoever. --General Insineratehymn 12:29, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete There is no hope for this. --Dexter111344 12:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • wtf? --THE 12:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Randomly rubbish. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 22:46, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 00:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Holy crap, this article is horrible. It's like someone took an infatuated user's experiment in <math> tags and built an article around it. Add to that random namedropping and general "wtf-ness", this article deserves to be gone.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Again, obscure. An unsolved mathematical problem many people won't be aware of or care about + unfunny random drivel = delete. --Under user 09:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Thermos (tree)

Keep
Delete
  • Crappy, unfunny, stupid article about a made up tree. Need I say more? --Dexter111344 12:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 22:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Splat --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 23:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 00:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Stupid. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete No, Dexter, you don't. But I will anyway, in case anyone cares. This article is short, with a bizarre and obscure-at-best concept. It refers to Hitler as the discoverer (exhibit A: random humor). It refers to "Lord of the Pings : Return of the Pong" (exhibit B: more random humor). Unfortunately, as a whole it reads as nothing more than a sad attempt. Sorry, but no dice.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. What Ljlego said. But shorter. --Under user 09:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Swinford

Keep
Delete
  • Towncruft and it's a dead-end. --Dexter111344 12:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 22:48, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Splat --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 23:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Quite a sweet poke of fun at the town. Unfortunately all the funny relies on inside knowledge. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 00:28, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete In all honesty, this reads as complete fact. Unless my sense of humor is woefully sub-par and I can't see the subtle humor present here, this is vanity, and the worst kind. It's the kind that's also true! Which, of course, is enough to delete. However, consider this: "In the last 20 years, 107 people have been savaged in werewolf attacks", a pathetic attempt at more present humor. This, and more, means bye-bye for Swinford.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:13, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. Quite liked some of it, such as the Lars Ulrich claim to fame. Nothing that really makes it worthwhile though. --Under user 09:22, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Sande

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Short piece of crap article about some place in Norway(it doesn't specify which Sande in Norway; both suck). A third of the article is Oscar Wilde and George W. Bush talking to one another. The rest of the article just isn't funny. Most of it was written by IP's in 2006. --Dexter111344 12:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 22:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Splat --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 23:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Not as sweet as the one above, and still too local-knowledgy. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:46, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 00:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This is, surprisingly enough, vanity. While the angry tone discourages this thought, it is indeed vanity. I've never heard of this place, I'm sure no one else has either. The only way someone can pull off an article like this is when it's done very well. This, needless to say, is not done well at all.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • I've heard of it. I've been to one of the Sande's in Norway. The place suck, just like this article. --Dexter111344 03:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Chill the Fuck Out

Keep
Delete
  • Delete When I first read this aricle's title, I thought it was written by my sister. Then, I quickly remembered, she doesn't come on Uncyclopedia. It article was written by a pot-head, though. I can tell. There is one funny paragraph in this thing. That is the paragraph about Tom's visit by the apparition. And that paragraph was only funny up to the Gary Coleman reference. Anything that anyone else finds funny could probably be sporked to Ben & Jerry's which needs serious help. --Dexter111344 12:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 22:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Too much stabbing. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:48, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 00:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Unfortunately, this is a pathetic attempt at articlizing (word? Certainly!) one of my all-time favorite images here. However, it is the sheer sub-mediocrity of this attempt, and nothing else, that forces me to vote this way.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I'll chill out when it's gone. --Under user 09:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments

To be continued

Keep
Delete
  • Old stub that's completely random. --General Insineratehymn 12:59, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Cliff hanger ending -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • I've determined this is just random crap and should be deleted. --Dexter111344 13:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 22:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Interesting concept, bad article. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Will I vote Keep? Will I vote Delete? Tune in next time! pssst, I end up voting delete! --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:23, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Hmmm, I see random numbers, silly random unfunny humor, and a veritable dead end. No redeeming value. You know, we should make a template like that...No Redeeming Value....Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:47, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Detele. To be discontinued. --Under user 10:08, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • I really like the last paragraph, and really don't like the rest, so I can't bring myself to vote either. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Crap

Keep
  • I'm going to have to vote keep. Whenever I see the {{crap}} template it informs me that the article can be improved. There is even a whole category of these, and I believe people will go their and worked on the pages. However, if we replace every {{crap}} template with {{rewrite}}, it will give people the impression that the whole article needs the be completely rewritten from what it is now. Also, people will get even more tired of seeing Charlie Brown saying "This article needs love". -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Keep Seems to me like you're forgetting - if we delete this template we still have the words "Template:crap" in red all over the place. The template has its place (ooh, deja vu! Have we voted on this before?) - it really needs a concerted pruning effort by someone because once it's come off enough pages, n00bs will stop knowing it exists and using it in all those deliciously inappropriate ways. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Consider it done. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 14:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep --Dexter111344 13:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Recently I've been making it my job to browse through overused templates and purge them from pages they don't remotely apply to, and when it comes to {{crap}}, no foe could be more unconquerable. This was created for the purpose (according to the text that accompanies it) of letting the author alert people that they've written a crap article, and they're no longer proud of it, yet nowadays it's much more italic just to QVFD or rewrite (or let someone else VFD or rewrite) said crappiness. This template is an unnecessary eyesore and has no redeeming value. Delete. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 13:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • At Kip: That's why we have{{Rewrite}}. It's even stated on the template's page that Rewrite should be used more now. Plus, there's more versions of Rewrite than just Charlie Brown. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 13:22, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • In a totally different subject, I find the template on Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit funny. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Kept, as per it being a long standing maintenance tag. What's next? VFDing {{ICU}}? -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Chevy Chase

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Includes: bad formatting, Chuck Norris, and the opposite of funny. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 19:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Dexter111344 20:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Crap -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 22:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 00:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Usually, one bad concept is enough to kill an article. In this case, there are two. Both poorly executed, the angles switch so abruptly that it's impossible to believe it's the same article. In fact, I can't....believe it's not butter! Ooooh, that was actually funnier than this page. Sad, eh?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Yes, very sad. --Under user 10:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Is it a term used by the police, a basketball player, a comedian or a police car? It feels like a bad episode of Call My Bluff. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  13:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Toilet Rim

Keep
Delete
Comments

Jack Sparkles

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. One huge, possibly vanity, list of facts. Only the grossly oversized images at the top prevent it from being 100 percent list. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 13:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Wikipedia and Google say vanity. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • 'Sparked' my interest. NOT! (Okay, you do a better pun.) -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Vanity 'Nuff said. --Dexter111344 20:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Vanity. Kill it, and the images. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:38, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Vanitycruft --General Insineratehymn 23:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as vanity, trusting Strange's scientific fact-finding. ----OEJ 23:55, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Martin Lawrence

Keep
Delete
  • De-1337 He did all those things? Wow! (lounge) --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sir Roger 07:09, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Wzup! -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Delete. I'm no Martin Lawrence fan, but this is just unfunny ranting. --Under user 12:38, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Dexter111344 20:14, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 23:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Random and poorly written. ("Antartican"?) ----OEJ 23:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Machine guns

Keep
Delete
  • Baleete It's just nonsense. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sir Roger 07:13, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Kill it off. --Under user 12:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Shoot to death --Dexter111344 20:00, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Agree with Alksub: randumb absurdity. ----OEJ 23:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I barely got passed the Angelina Jolie template before I knew it was going to be crap. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
Comments

Stevie Ray Vaughan

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. This is one of those articles that is bad in so many ways you can't quite pinpoint the exact area in which it sucks the most. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - The past revisions are basically the same crap. He deserves a better article than this. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sir Roger 07:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I've got the "somebody's written yet another ranty article" blues. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not a single redeeming feature. --Under user 12:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Dexter111344 19:10, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Would like an article on SRV, but there's nothing salvageable from the one here. It is just unfunny, semi-violent rambling. ----OEJ 00:03, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Falador

Keep
Delete
  • Runescrap --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:44, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - I don't think even RuneScape fans would like this piece of crap. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:48, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sir Roger 07:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Online-gamer vanity I guess? --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Good guess, I reckon, SBU. --Under user 12:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • The last section was definetly vanity. The rest of it just wasn't funny. --Dexter111344 18:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • It is too short to justify having an article on such an obscure subject. Delete --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Dunno if it's factual, but it sure is dull. A Falador city guide. ----OEJ 00:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments

I'm sorry I haven't a clue

Keep
Delete
  • Delete + Wha? --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Short and "trivia"-laden. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:56, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as per TKF P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - I'm sure a good article could be written with this title, but this isn't it. Couldn't find any funny in this. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sir Roger 07:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Maybe it's meant to be self-referential. But still, delete. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  11:20, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Man that's quite obscure. It's about a UK radio comedy panel show. The show itself can be quite funny. There's a slight possibility of a well-written article about it being a good read, if any Uncyc contributor could be bothered. This, however, is tripe. --Under user 12:29, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and Under user is the only person who guessed the reference. Oh, this article is no where near as funny as the show. --Dexter111344 18:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 23:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Underdeveloped, picless. ----OEJ 00:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Wickedpedia has an article on it here.

Bag

Keep
  • Keep Humour by means of extreme stating-the-obviousness. I reverted all the recent rubbish (ironically back to its 2005 days...) --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. The oatmeal of obviousness can be used in moderation to cleanse the palate of comedy. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as per SbU. I think this is an OK concept, just needs a bit of expansion. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I added a bit. Sir Roger 07:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Not bad, don't think it's delete worthy. --Under user 12:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand some. Maybe add a picture of a bag... --Dexter111344 18:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Baleet --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Fairly thin. Defines a bag as "Made for shitting on." Huff --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:55, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

The Sandman

Keep
Delete
  • Delete The crappiness of this article is undeniable. Somehow, Dr. Phil is a rapper. This conept alone makes it worth killing. But, if not, consider this: it is random, with random numbers and random humor, it is all over the place perspective-wise, and "The Sandman has made such valuable musical contributions such as "Who the Fuck was That", recorded in early 2000" is arguably the funniest one in the article.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Quite horrible, really. ----OEJ 19:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete From the first edit, looks like it was vanity hastily reattributed. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The Doctor is out. --Under user 12:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • huh? -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • And now I quote the Doctor "I'm a drunk pimp"(Yes, he actually said this). Therefore, he can't be a rapper. --Dexter111344 18:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

M-men

Keep
Delete
  • Delete I would say something like "well-written satire on the plight of immigrants today." However, it is not that. It is not funny, nor well-written. It devolves into a rant halfway past the long list, and it is not a topic that I care to see here. Also, I feel like it was on here before, but that could just be the voices in my head.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Summaries of imaginary plotlines are not funny. 90% of this piece is simply summarized plot with no jokes, no scenes (therefore no situational humor), and little coherence. ----OEJ 19:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Fictitious subject, no humour, and the racist epithets don't help. Huff --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per everyone else. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:00, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ditto. --Radioactive afikomen 06:09, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • DeleteIncoherent twaddle. --Under user 12:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Dexter111344 19:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete As above. Its already been said. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:35, 01 August 2007
Comments

The Fairly OddParents

Keep
Delete
Comments

Blaming Suicide

Keep
Delete
Comments

Epic Movie

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Yes, this is a concept worthy of writing. However, it should not be written like this. Placing a rewrite tag on it is not the answer, because most writers don't even spare those categories a passing glance. If deletion is the only way to draw people's attention to this article's need to be rewritten, so be it. And it needs to be rewritten. "In January of 2007, a release of the Epic Movie sequel opened in theaters. The sequel was directed by Mel Gibson" is an example of the dumbness exuded by this article.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Going to surprise you by voting delete. It's just pure random - maybe there are glimmers of what might have been in the last paragraph, but barely enough to even give you the idea for a rewrite. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:10, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Strange but untrue. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Mail prostitute

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Might be best to move it to UnDictionary. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Really quite funny, but terribly underdeveloped. I copied the text to my userspace, and will work on it at some future date if it gets deleted...I don't have the time right now, so I can't vote "Keep". ----OEJ 19:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Juan Valdez

Keep
Delete
Comments

Police dog

Keep
Delete
  • Delete From Lounge. It's a joke. No, literally, it's a joke. And either there's something I'm not getting, or it just isn't funny. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete A joke that made me laugh in the pub - after seven pints. Doesn't work when I'm sober. RabbiTechno 17:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Uncyc is no place for jokes. Well, you know what I mean. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Delete Shaggy Dog Story except unfunny and ungood (kinda like Shaggy Dog Story, but at least that has a point).-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Not especially funny, long, or shaggy, and is all over the Internet[1]. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Shaggy Dog Stories suck. All of them. Even this one. --Dexter111344 20:12, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Horace Export

Keep
Delete
  • Delete From Lounge. Also from the Haskodrome series, which is strange enough that I haven't had the heart to nom it's few remaining pages. But this one doesn't stand alone, so here it is. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete My browser crashed while I read it - sure there's no connection, but I'm in a bad mood now. RabbiTechno 17:42, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Isn't this vanity? It looks like it, from the picture.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and the picture as well. --Dexter111344 19:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete article and picture too. ----OEJ 19:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Game Boy Microscopic

Keep
  • Keep I had a quick tidy to see what was under the layers of grimy English and it turned out okay. If it gets deleted I'll nick the good bits for the Yocto article. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep It definately has merit now, post clean up. Thanks Sbu!! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:47, 30 July 2007
  • Keep this. It isn't that bad. --Dexter111344 17:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • I've just put about 8 VFD tags on articles - please remember. Sir Roger 21:33, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Quantum Penis Physics

Keep
  • Keep Bad, but not VFD bad. Sir Roger 21:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Obelisk

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • I knew someone was going to vote keep because of the bubble joke! I'll admit I found that pretty funny. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Trivium

Keep
  • Nothing. It's really that crap --Urmu 16:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Absolutely everything --Urmu 16:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Please ban the idiot who wrote this article. The page is clearly biased, un-imaginative and not funny.
  • Kept, as per it having an ICU. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:27, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Club soda

Keep
  • Not very long, anachronistic, but well-written and worth keeping. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Ð and Đ

Keep
Delete
  • Delete While I may be missing the joke, it seems there is none. It seems as unwinnable as Game:Zork and as annoying as Where's Waldo?, sans the proverbial Waldo.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Bazooka both pieces of merda. –—Hv (talk) 29/07 22:26
  • De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 23:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 23:43, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 00:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I saw these get created, and thought I'd give them a chance to live for a while for some reason. Now they're here though, I haven't anything to say in their defense. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:31, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. A joke that very few will get, fewer still will even chuckle at, and only the author could have thought was a good idea. --Under user 12:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Basically, there's two D-strokes in different languages, and for some reason they are separate characters in Unicode. You want to throw in Đ too (different article). –—Hv (talk) 29/07 22:26

Hermione Granger

Keep
Delete
Comments

Jeff Brooks

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Crudeness, and I can't work out who the subject actually is either. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:01, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete "Jeff was born to a river merchant and his neo-Nazi fascist wife", a pic with a caption of "Jeff boned this dude. Hard.", and accusations of pedophilia are only the tip of the iceberg in this crapfest of an article.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:44, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 00:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - The less said about this, the better. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 04:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. There really are some nasty little people out there. --Under user 12:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Poorly expressed hatred. ----OEJ 12:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Bah! -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
Comments

Harper Valley PTA

Keep
Delete
  • Delete I believe we'll call this "Pottercruft" - bad fiction starring Harry and chums. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:01, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It uses the spoiler template, which in itself strongly merits its deletion. However, the fanfic vibe that so clearly emits from it is the clincher.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 00:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - random, unfunny, weird fiction. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 04:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Pointless. --Under user 12:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I couldn't read all of it. Too incoherent and uninteresting. ----OEJ 12:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Titirangi

Keep
Delete
Comments

Godel, Escher, Bach

Keep
Delete
Comments

The Wallpaper

Keep
Delete
Comments

Redhate

Keep
Delete
Comments

Scarlett O'Hara

Keep
Delete
  • 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 16:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Random namedrops do no one any good.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Frankly, article, I don't give a damn. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 00:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - I won't try to beat Sbu's deletion reason. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Darn what a brilliant reason. :( Wish I'd thought of it. But then I'm not as clever as Sbu. But still infinitely more clever than this article. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:53, 30 July 2007
  • Delete. As God is my witness, I'll never read this article again. Not as good as SBU's reason, but had to be done. --Under user 11:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

The Great Wijmanus

Keep
Delete
Comments

International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness

Keep
Delete
Comments

The LOLocaust

Keep
Delete
  • Delete along with the picture as below. Sir Roger 00:19, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      02:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 04:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Not good enough or funny enough to justify the controversial subject. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:43, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete But only as per Cs1987's comment, doesn't do the idea justice. The pic is good though. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:44, 29 July 2007
Comments
  • The article itself isn't that bad. It isn't even offensive if you consider that there really were some jewish humorists doing humor back then even in those places. However, I do think the picture is unaceptable. If the only way to delete the picture is deleting the article I might end up voting for its deletio.---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 02:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Ipswich Town - Ipshit Town

Keep
Delete
Comments

Noein

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. I helped this page by formatting it, but the content is just awful. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete *sigh* Yet another bad anime article. Why can't they take a page from Cowboy Bebop and not suck?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:18, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Another one. Groan. Sir Roger 00:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. My brain hurts! -- the tinfoil hat does nothing! ----OEJ 01:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 04:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Meme

Keep
Delete
  • Hey Vegeta, what's the scouter say about his CRAP level? IT'S OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAND! --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 22:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC) PS: I missed doing this.
  • Delete Although do check out Susan Blackmore's book, which is indeed called The Meme Machine and is very interesting. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Upon rethinking of my vote, I realized that {{rewrite|hard}} means that the rewriter ignores all content on the page. Thus, DELETE and rewrite.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Wasn't funny even the second time through. Sir Roger 00:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Quite horrible, actually. ----OEJ 01:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 04:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Wizzill

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Vanityshite. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:19, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It's vain, it's not even vaguely amusing, it flits between perspectives, and the pic should be huffed too. Long numbery filename means digital camera!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete You could probably have got away with replacing the ICU, since it's not gone 7 straight days without one yet. But if it's just because it won't lie down and die that you're putting it on here then fair enough. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Don't admins automatically delete vanity? Sir Roger 00:32, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. ----OEJ 01:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • QVFD     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      02:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 04:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Austin Heroin Festival

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Short, with a vaguely nauseating picture of a guy shooting up. Tagged for rewrite 7 months ago, and I honestly don't think it's necessary to rewrite it at all.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Not a core topic and can't be rewritten. Kill the pic of the guy too. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:25, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sir Roger 21:26, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable or especially worthwhile. ----OEJ 01:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 04:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:16, 29 July 2007
Comments

Image:Lolocaust.jpg

Keep
  • Keep. Yes, out of context, it's dumb, tasteless crap...but it's on a page that's not entirely bad, and it's appropriate for its page. VFD the page, instead. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Agreed - it's appropriate to the article it's in. I should get round to vetting Lounge entries more... --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Just the name made me laugh. In the age of lol-everything, someone HAD to do this eventually. Doesn't mean I like it but cmon theres way worse pictures out there. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:39, 29 July 2007
Delete
  • Strong Delete Text-based, blatantly tasteless, and unfunny.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Ljlego. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 17:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff Tasteless, lolcats-grade. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Conditional delete - delete if the article (above) goes too. Sir Roger 00:20, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I disagree with SBU and Modus. The article is allright, the picture spoils it, couse it's dumb and tasteless no matter in what article it's placed.---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 02:55, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 04:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Mega Man VI

Keep
Delete
Comments

Gay gland

Keep
Delete
Comments

Triagram

Keep
Delete
Comments

My name is Asher Lev

Keep
Delete
Comments
Personal tools
projects