Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive82

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Wester

Keep
  • Keep. It's a good little idea. I am now expanding upon it. ----OEJ 00:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and {{idea}}. Again.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per expansion. Also it was kept less than a month ago Insineratehymn. At least pick some older things to repeat if you must bring things back. And I don't see why you have to, considering how much real crap is out there. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment I know that, but you see, I hate the hypocrisy of the people who vote keep and say that it should be expanded, but they never expand it. For once, I just want those people to actually practice what they preach. --General Insineratehymn 15:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Well that would be fair enough I guess, except that only 2 out of 5 keep voters actually thought it needed anything done to it. The rest of us liked it enough as it was. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • This was previously kept, with people saying that it should be expanded. So far, I have yet to see a single person do anything to expand this article. If no one is going to expand it, then delete. --General Insineratehymn 21:39, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:40, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • I separated the piece into three sections, did some work on the history of Wester, and expanded the religious significance section. And added a picture. That's all I'm going to do on it right now. Vote accordingly. ----OEJ 03:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Abstain on principle. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:24, 28 July 2007

Thomas the Tank Engine and Friends

Keep
  • Keep: I love Thomas, and I've joined tons of forums and own tons of models, but loving something means you gotta be able to make fun of it, too. The page is coming out nicely. Mr Whiskers 21:34, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Filth, utter filth. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Thomas the Tank Engine was the best shit ever when I was little. This page is an absolute mockery of my childhood happiness. --General Insineratehymn 21:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete "He was also the 63rd President of the United Spades of Amerika." I appreciate Mr Whiskers point, we should indeed be able to laugh at it. Sadly this was not possible. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:50, 27 July 2007
  • Delete Ouch. Reading things like "Tho-maz tuh he Eensjiene","host Jimmy Swaggart", countless other namedrops, and seeing a photoshop only a mother could love (and even that would be a stretch), I must do it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 03:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • There is a funnier version in the history that I think satirises the page better. If not, I can easily write the page over with better satire. I'm a die-hard fan of this show, and I can find a way to make jokes out of it (it's what we fans do. );) Mr Whiskers 21:59, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Your version of the page is extremely poorly formatted, extremely listy and lacks satire. Read HTBFANJS and start working on a better rewrite in your userspace if you love Thomas so much. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 22:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Mr. Whiskers has copied Thomas as his userpage, which is certainly within his rights. Let it rest in peace in that locale. *Makes the sign of the coypu over the remains* ----OEJ 23:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

I'll take the time to make up for my attitude. All I was trying to say is that, to the true fans of the series who understand how it functions (and - in today's series - malfunctions), it was funny. Perhaps, when I can figure out how to properly redo it so that each's own will understand it, I can recreate the page the way it should've been. In the meantime, the disgrace that the others turned the page into can sink away... With honour, Mr Whiskers 00:20, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Well said...er, written. I humbly suggest you cloister the best version -- the one you personally like best -- in your user space and revise it at your leisure. When it is fully baked and nicely brown, put into the mainspace. If well and honorably done this should cause no rumpled undies amongst the denizens of Uncyc. I would hope. ----OEJ 01:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

9035768

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Abs Bogdanovich believes there is a point in there somewhere. Unfortunately, that point is somewhere...deeper. --THINKER 04:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Soda Paradox

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Merged. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Good idea. Not much for a full article really but not a bad little thought. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • If it does get deleted, I have a copy here. I'm going to love it like my own son. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • This has already been merged; please take it off the VFD page and either delete the remaining article or redirect.Sir Roger 19:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Air America Radio

Keep
Delete
Comments

AAR

Keep
Delete
Comments

Empire of Nova Doomia

Keep
Delete
  • Delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:19, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't know who placed the {{idea}}, and I'm too lazy to check. However, rest assured, this is not a great idea. Switches back and forth between first and third person perspective, repeats its points until my brain bleeds, and bad political satire.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Randomcruft --General Insineratehymn 03:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 03:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't really get what's meant to be funny here. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:18, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 15:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Intonation

Keep
Delete
Comments

Edinburgh Military T.A.T.U.

Keep
Delete
  • Delete: This ain't funny at all. While I am trying my best to avoid bias, I feel that this article is a random mess of cruft about alternative sexual orientations. This has nothing to do with the band t.A.T.u. either. Pentium5dot1 01:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Quite bad, really; short and picless as well. ----OEJ 02:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Plus, if this really existed, there should certainly be some mention of the BNP in there!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 03:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Bad, listy, texty and bad. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 15:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Queer Eye for the Straight Guy

Keep
Delete
Comments

Jewel Denyle

Keep
Delete
  • Sexcruft --General Insineratehymn 21:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wow, an article that talks about pornography. Just like 50,000 others. Except that this one is shorter and stupider than most. ----OEJ 23:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:39, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete "She was for a time a contract performer for Dog Sensations, but the constant barking as an inability to be understood by others, had its payoffs." Er....what?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:24, 28 July 2007
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 14:59, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Gumbology

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Vanity/crap. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Firm, throbbing delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:40, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. "Gumbies react to the surrounding environment in a different manner, they tend to have a lower sense of danger towards people and objects" is a strikingly bad sentence. And I agree with Alksub, get the vanity-or-whatever pics off the server too. ----OEJ 22:52, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Vanitycruft --General Insineratehymn 23:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:40, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It reads like an enthralled teen astounded at his own wisdom. Unfortunately, said teen is obviously lacking in the "wisdom" department, as the incoherent writing and absolutely abysmal topic prove.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:22, 28 July 2007
  • S**** -- Hindleyite Converse 11:26, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 14:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Lamb of Gay

Keep
Delete
Comments

Chimera

Keep
Delete
  • Delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Randumb --General Insineratehymn 21:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:51, 27 July 2007
  • Delete. Gamecruft, incoherent and randumb as well -- check the section titled "Home Planet". ----OEJ 23:32, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete "pika pik apika I TORCH YOUR ASS PUNY HUMAN!! pika pika pika!" and localization that would make Zero Wing look like Shakespeare (For the Genetics meaning of Chimera, get out of here and created it). Not a resounding compliment.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 02:59, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 14:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Harley

Keep
  • Weak keep. Bad, but not delete bad. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete From Lounge. I believe the creation message in the edit history tells you all you need to know about the author's motivation: "A page on everyones favourite Pokemon Coordinater, Harley. HAH!" --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I find "story" humour just as bad as "random humour," Pokemon or not - the writer just drones on telling a story with little or no humourous merit. Sir Roger 04:13, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I read One-eyed Jack's comment before reading the article, and I agree in some respects, however I feel that any article whose primary angle is gay-jokes does not deserve to exist. Particularly when misused, as here, as a derogatory statement against a person/character/inanimate object which the author merely dislikes intensely. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:21, 27 July 2007
  • Delete - About 99.9999% of the world's population would not care about this article. Also, Harley is gay, apparently. The article doesn't seem to bring that up... Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes, please Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:48, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, but please redirect this page to Harley-Davidson after throwing its current contents in the trash. Pentium5dot1 01:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Kill --Dexter111344 02:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Eek. Anime related and very fanboyish. To me, that is.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • The article itself is not badly written, has appropriate images, etc. I can't bring myself to vote delete. The fact is, however, it is moronic Pokemon for idiotic Pokemon's sake, and it is made to be read by Pokemonites. I detest the page. It seems to be an Uncyclopedia article that only developmentally delayed middle-schoolers "get". (I sometimes fantasize that Uncyc is read by adults...) I certainly can't vote keep. I guess that means I have to abstain -- but I will do it with many, many boring words. There. Now I'm done. ----OEJ 02:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Clancy Brown

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Namedropping, expounds on the awesome power of the subject. Escaped ICU. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Alksub mentioned, most of the "humour" is just namedropping and referring to the subject as a "BADASS uber-bad guy". Didn't find any of it the slightest bit funny. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Darn, for a second there I thought we were going to see Carlow Crab II. Shame :( ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 08:54, 27 July 2007
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 15:07, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Scrap --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 19:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Template:thumbsup

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Perfectly useless "approves" template. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - One of many unfunny, useless templates. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:13, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The template doth not maketh the articleth. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 08:53, 27 July 2007
  • Delete Just not needed. --Under user 09:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 13:43, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 15:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Big Bang Comics

Keep
Delete
  • Delete And finally the page that started it all... --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Boring. Fiction about fiction should at least have the common decency to be satirically deconstructionist. This article has the depth of a puddle of flat Pepsi. ----OEJ 02:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 03:33, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sir Roger 04:02, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Pow! Boffo! --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 04:37, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Biff! Blammo! Copying TKF because he was so spot on with his comments. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:12, 27 July 2007
  • Delete. Did whoever came up with these Big Bang pages miss the point of Uncyc? Not funny. --Under user 09:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Shadow Lady

Keep
Delete
  • Delete This is yet another Big Bang Comics hero(ine). We've nearly run out of them now, and I actually think the last one could be salvaged so I won't add that. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I feel that rote recitations of a bunch of spurious events and facts about a spurious and fictional character makes an article neither funny nor satirical. ----OEJ 02:24, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 03:32, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • KA-POW!! Sir Roger 04:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:06, 27 July 2007
  • Delete. Hnng. --Under user 09:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

N.J.O.O.

Keep
Delete
  • Huff Article on a fictional cult that does random stuff. The images are vanity. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete We're all special in our own way. No need to create articles on how special you are. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Revolting in a completely "physcihal" way. ----OEJ 02:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete. Would have put this up myself. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 03:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Ugh how did that survive QVFD?!!? Should have been huffed at birth. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:04, 27 July 2007
  • Delete. Vanity. --Under user 09:02, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 13:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

War & Peace

Keep
Delete
  • 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 21:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Yeah, pretty short and bad, and War and Peace already exists. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Genocide is the only option. With a redirect in its place.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      00:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The drawing!!! I can just see the artist with his tongue sticking out the corner of his mouth, looking all proud. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:13, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Egads. Incoherent, short, and SBU is right, the drawing has the special feel of something created by someone who can't drool and blink at the same time. ----OEJ 02:37, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 03:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 04:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Where did the gnomes come into it?! O_o ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:00, 27 July 2007
  • Delete Tragic. --Under user 08:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • I'm torn here, because, as an example of the worst possible uncyclopedia article, I find it hilarious. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  15:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Ford Fiesta

Keep
Delete
  • 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 21:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 03:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sir Roger 03:58, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Definately ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:59, 27 July 2007
  • Delete - Short, random, not very funny. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:13, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not at all funny. --Under user 08:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Crap. Unlike the car itself, which is hilariously crap. RabbiTechno 17:24, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Ostrich

Keep
Delete
  • 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 21:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Leaps from subject to subject with all the style and grace of... well, an ostrich. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Merely badly written and incoherent. ----OEJ 02:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 03:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Good grief that was so bad. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:56, 27 July 2007
  • Ostrich Crap. Sir Roger 03:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Tripe. --Under user 08:48, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Where are my god damn pants?

Keep
Delete
Comments

13 (number)

Keep
Delete
Comments

Meditation

Keep
  • Keep "Once his mind is full of problems, the monk must then attempt to find solutions, to all of them at once." Beautiful. Even the list of problems is varied and hilarious. Somebody give it a picture of a worried-looking Buddhist. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I can't help but bring attention once again to the comment I left under Hurricane of Horrible Destruction and Death or w/e it was called. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:47, 27 July 2007
  • Keep Pretty good I think. Sir Roger 03:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Whoa, what's with me and the Keep votes? (I liked it, could use a few tweaks) --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Hurricane Of Horrendous Destruction and Death

Keep
Delete
Comments

Also, it bugs me when people give "2005/6cruft" as a reason to delete. Can't you find a reason that doesn't depend on the year it was written? I'll accept "it sucks," mind you... —Hinoa talk.kun 23:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Agreed -_- Also I think there are way too many decent articles making it onto VFD at the moment. There isn't a daily nom quota you have to fill guys. If it doesn't suck that bad, you don't HAVE to fill up VFD with not-so-sucky articles. We all have better things to do with our time. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:24, 27 July 2007
2005cruft is a reason, just as sexcruft and towncruft, etc. are. Each refers to an UnGenre of poorly written article. In the case of 2005cruft, it's not the fact it happened to be written in 2005; it's that there were so many very short, poor articles written when Uncycl. began, which we are in the process of eliminating. Likewise, randomcruft are articles that depend on the overused random form of humour, and sexcruft relies purely on cliche sex. And I've experienced cliche sex just a few times too many. Sir Roger 03:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Then don't use the name "2005/6cruft" to describe it. Try "old and unfunny." —Hinoa talk.kun 04:35, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
As I've said before, I think it's kind of become part of the vocabulary now. But I think it should be used sparingly, just because the more you use it the more you start to automatically associate old and rarely-edited articles with awfulness. Giving reasons is a nice internal self-check that you're nomming this because it's not funny rather than just not to your taste. Even the worst article deserves at least the couple of seconds thought it takes to find a reason why it sucks, at least when nominating. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

2005cruft does have a definition. It means "Articles from 2005 that have had little contributions (under 30) and are just plain rubbish." --General Insineratehymn 13:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Margaret Cho

Keep
Delete
  • Delete From Lounge. Little nuggets of crudity, exaggeration, namedropping, unfunny fiction, and many many more. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:10, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 09:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Unfunny and random. Let me take this opportunity to thank Sbu for cleaning up after whichever admin forgot to archive. It's a dirty job, but I guess someone's gotta do it. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 11:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Blech awful --THINKER 12:09, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Merda, terrible. –—Hv (talk) 26/07 12:10
  • Delete. Just not funny. --Under user 12:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete-Just nasty. --Carpet Pig 13:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Zoey

Keep
Delete
  • Delete From Lounge. Another of those plain fiction-no-funny article. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 09:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Yeah, even without the lists this is pretty bad. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 11:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Bad. --Under user 12:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Template:JoelDisapproves and Template:JoelLikes

Keep
Delete
Comments

Hitler's Holocaust

Keep
Delete
  • Holocauster it. Yet another unfunny article that belongs to the never ending Hitleraii of Uncync. ~Jewriken.GIF 08:11, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 08:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • How many people here have written a Hitler or Nazi page? <almost everybody puts up hand> How many of them suck? <almost everybody puts up hand> How many people want to go to the cloakroom to rub seafood on my naked body? <crickets chirping> Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
    • So...the crickets will be there too? -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 08:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
      • Just me, the crickets, and a plate of seafood, sadly. *sniff* Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
        • It's a shame I can't be there; I'm allergic to Modusoperandi. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 08:45, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Also, I don't remember writing a Nazi article. Now if you'd said communism - I got my first ninjastar from Tom for communism articles. Ah, those were the days... --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • That means he likes you. Next, he'll push you down in the mud during recess. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Give it a good gassing of Zyklon-B --General Insineratehymn 08:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - I gotta start reading the stuff I deadend tag... Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 11:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. –—Hv (talk) 26/07 11:51
  • Delete An atrocity. --Under user 12:09, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Big blak

Keep
Delete
  • Delete - The fact that this piece of crap survived without ICU or QVFD is rather disappointing. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Shoot it and shoot it dead. --General Insineratehymn 07:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • --~Jewriken.GIF 08:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Whoever wrote this page should probably cut down on the coffee because the caffeine is messing with his or her ability to put punctuation of any kind in to distinguish where one sentence ends and another begins this combined with a lack of capitalization except at the beginning makes the page really hard to really which doesn't really matter because the page is crap Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 08:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete with similar disappointed sentiments to Cs. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:17, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Christ, that's awful. --Under user 12:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Discworld

Keep
  • Keep....I've had a clean up, and reckon this could be saved. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  • Keep per Mhaille. I don't always vote with Mhaille, but this time he's right. As always. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, although I'd probably get rid of the book list which is just a bunch of rather unfunny puns. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:12, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Me Likey...but get rid of the list of books BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) 10:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Agree the list needs to go, but the rest isn't beyond redemption. --Under user 12:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 13:06, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as above. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:01, 26 July 2007
  • Keep, also as above. –—Hv (talk) 26/07 11:06
Delete
  • The bulk of this article is a really ugly and poorly laid-out wikitable with too many obscure references and in-jokes to be funny. Also, because pure lack of quality might not be enough, let me add: this article has very little hope of getting better. As discussed on the talk page, the Discworld series is itself a parody, and there really isn't anything left to build on. -Tritefantastic 21:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff Stumbles through pseudo-history and -philosophy without ever making sense. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Undoubtedly a subject we need an article on, but a fresh start might be the only way to get a worthwhile one. If it is kept, the booklist must go! RabbiTechno 11:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Pratchett's Discworld is hilarious... anything written about it is very probably less funny than the actual world... what is there to parody?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 07:33 Nov 28, 2014 03:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Beautiful People

Keep
  • Keep --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep "...and he realized his grievous error: without intelligence, the tongue knows not when to shut the fuck up." A good little bit of fake theology. I'm not seeing the ugliness or the undefined funniness... --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keeps Its Quite Funny In Places BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) 10:39, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - but only just. Eve as high school girl is funny. Ugly as hell though. RabbiTechno 11:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 02:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Ugly Article --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Undefined funny, theres no relation between "beautiful people" and the tale about god making mistakes. --Reinn 06:15, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:58, 26 July 2007
Comments

Welder switch

Keep
Still delete the picture. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • 2005cruft. Delete the picture as well. --General Insineratehymn 02:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Get Rid Too Short And Not Funny...And The Picture? *Shudders* BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) 10:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete with reservations (see comments). RabbiTechno 11:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • This is quite funny, but perhaps a bit short and stubby to be an article on its own. If it could be fitted into an article on special effects or something similar, it would live a long, happy and productive life. Anyone know of a suitable home for it? I had a quick look but couldn't find anywhere obvious. RabbiTechno 11:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Kiddie Fiddler

Keep
  • Keep I can't think how you could expand this without making it less good - deserves to be allowed stub-dom. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Its A Good Idea, Give It A Chance BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) 10:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep The joke's there. I don't think it really needs to be any longer. The Oblong Lobster 21:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • This seems more like Illogicopedia stuff to me, perhaps Hindleyite could transwiki it. If this isn't kept, and he doesn't appear, I'll just chuck it straight on there. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:39, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Loved this stub for a long time. I'll add it to my to-do list. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 07/26 15:57

Swarthmore College

Keep
Delete
Comments

Duke Nukem

Keep
  • It's really not that terrible... but that's just my opinion. --Hanyouman 01:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I like it. User:Ekasp/Zig 03:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep but really needs to capitalise on all the untapped potential of the "first Duke of Nukem" idea. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep with reservations, with reference to SBU's comment above. Also really needs proof-reading. RabbiTechno 11:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Amy Lee

Keep
  • Keep. There are some good bits. I like the opening quotation (although I have no idea who Margaret Cho is) and bits of the career section. A bit of ruthless editing could do wonders. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  11:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
I've made some changes and while it's still not perfect I think it's a real improvement. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  17:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • How can you be a goth when you have a name like a female extra in the Dukes of Hazzard anyway? RabbiTechno 11:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Just in case, this does still get deletified, would whomever does so please put it in my userspace? Cheers. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  10:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Judith and I

Keep
  • Weak keep Has a nice concept, if only it was coherant, less rambly and kinda, oh I dunno, finished. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:22, 23 July 2007
  • Keep. It reminds me of the time my brain broke and I summoned an invisible girl. Never finished that story, either. Damn you, court-mandated chemical castrastion! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Has the word 'rambunctious' in it. I like it... The Oblong Lobster 23:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep This is a hoot, and so like so many first time novels. I think that I might take it on and move it to Unbooks for spin. If it does get zapped, can whomever move to my namespace? Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 23:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep, mainly since it looks like it's got half a chance of being finished now. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:14, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • WIP has been there for over a week without any edits. This is just crap. It is begging to be deleted. --Dexter111344 02:02, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete A week-old WIP? That equals Abandoned WIP. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Insane-Contrast 12:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete upon principle. The content's there, but there isn't enough of it. If enough work is done on it this vote could be switched. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 04:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It Could Be Saved...But Theres Not Really Much You Can Say About That Topic BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) 10:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sort of sweet in a way, but utterly and entirely devoid of any point at all. RabbiTechno 11:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Sexonomics

Keep
Delete
Comments

Shiks

Keep
Delete
  • Blech --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:10, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Didn't find any of it funny, and the subject is just weird. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Not Funny At All. Very Poor BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) 10:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete 0/10. See me after class. RabbiTechno 11:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 12:32, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Totally random, utterly pointless. --Under user 12:38, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Beat this article like the red-headed step-child with a toaster that is still hot from toasting your bread. --Dexter111344 16:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Airplane

Keep
Delete
  • Randumb and short. Huff it away --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 03:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, although I like the whole idea of Jefferson Airplane and Jefferson Starship being people, everything else about this is crap. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:00, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff Its Just Not Funny BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) 10:28, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Huh? I don't understand it. Far too random. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  09:32, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete...from here, but donate to Illogicapedia, where it might feel at home? RabbiTechno 11:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 12:31, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Hurt my brain in a bad way. --Under user 12:37, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Sum 41

Keep
Delete
  • Just look at it, there's no links, other than red links, grammatical and spelling errors and I fail to see any humor. Delete--Sir Manforman CUN 13:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Agreed. --Under user 13:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 17:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Short. The scientific language falls down. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Agreed Once Again BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) 10:36, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The article is as bad as the band. RabbiTechno 11:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 12:30, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Can we also delete all of the bands music? --Dexter111344 17:03, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Ford Taurus

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • One suspects the author got cut up by one on his way to work...RabbiTechno 14:53, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Pope George Ringo I

Keep
Delete
  • 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 02:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 02:30, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Good title, but it's linked from a few places, so it can be recreated when someone comes up with some good funny to go with it. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:15, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff Crap BonSig.png (Bonner) Icons-flag-gb (Talk) 10:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Eeew, as I believe young people say. RabbiTechno 11:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Stub, opposites and randomness. Even if it was longer and written more betterer it would still be fighting its own unfortunate subject. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 12:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

The A-Capella Syndrome

Keep
Delete
Comments

Man Magma

Keep
Delete
  • 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 02:33, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Sexual humor is funny sometimes, but this is awful. -- Hanyouman 02:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Sexcruft. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Mollocks??? --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Pointless --Under user 13:13, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • While I oppose the children hating on oldschool stuff from the early glory days of uncyclopedia, I don't know how this ever lived so long. Clearly missed in an early FFW, then it was spared due to FFW rules about things that survived the former FFW. I say huff, with great prejudice. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2007.07.24.18:25
Comments

Baby seal club sandwhich

Keep
Delete
  • I've offered plenty of help on this, and as it appears, there has been no effort to finish this article. So therefore, Delete--Sir Manforman CUN 21:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Aye ~Jewriken.GIF 04:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete VyvyanWilde's Pee Review of this made me laugh more than the article itself. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Poor --Under user 13:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • There's a spelling mistake in the title. That just about sums it up. –—Hv (talk) 24/07 18:00
  • It's word soup. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Shame seeing as there's a non-sexual double entendre in the title. Ж Kalir hippies! yay! 01:17, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 01:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Respectacle

Keep
Delete
Comments

Heavy Classical

Keep
Delete
Comments

Chicken Boo

Keep
Delete
Comments

Matti Vanhanen

Keep
Delete
Comments

UnScripts:Oliver Comes to Tea

Keep
Delete
Comments

Albarnism

Keep
Delete
Comments

Bushix

Keep
  • Keep Needs a severe pruning though, including all those redlinks. Could come out as quite a nice little parody half as long as the original... --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Master Asia

Keep
  • Keep Me likely for some strange reason. It could be shortened some. --Dexter111344 03:06, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Popophobia

Keep
Delete
Comments

Namaste

Keep
Delete
Comments

Gaara

Keep
  • It's funny and decent enough to keep it still. The picture's cracking me up. Reinn 08:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Childish and aimless. Give it bronze in the "fastest two live" race --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 00:38, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • This wasn't already deleted? I thought it had been... Oh well. Can all Naruto-related pages just be CVP'd? Naruto already is. Also, delete this CVP-bypassing shit. --Dexter111344 01:45, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Well, it had been... I still suggesting CVPing all Naruto-related articles because no one seems to be able to come up with any funny related to it.--Dexter111344 01:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • One day, someone will write a funny Naruto-related article. I have faith. It's a bit like religion in that it's not based on any of the evidence. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:11, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Wouter Veldhoen

Keep
Delete
Comments

Rolf Van der Laan

Keep
  • Keep. Rolf Van Der Laan is someone who was referenced on the Holland page ages before the Rolf Van der Laan page was ever created, as reference to the history of the page will reveal. The fact that he is not famous is the essence of the joke: in real life he is the less than successful relative of two actual Dutch politicians, Medy van der Laan and Lousewies van der Laan.
Kindly remember that Wikipedia is read in more countries than just the United States, so you should be taking into account cultural differences. --Zonk69 20:20, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep Actually, I quite like the way it pokes fun at the fact that us US/UK/etc people have never heard of anyone from them countries where they speak funny. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Sir Roger 22:34, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep despite the fact that if this article went under quoticide, it'd be almost nothing. --Dexter111344 01:31, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Oh, and for future reference Marconius, VFD has a limit of 15 - when it's full use the Poopsmith's Lounge (link above) or hold onto your rubbish until there's some space on the rubbish wagon. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:52, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
    • I'm sorry, I thought it was max. 15 pages for one person. I'm not a native speaker (far away from that), so I didn't understead it... The preceding unsigned comment was added by Marconius (talk • contribs)
Personal tools
projects