Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive81

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

A.C.M

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • That is the first time I've used the username template. I'm not abusing it. --Dexter111344 17:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Icelandish

Keep
Delete
Comments

Hebrew language

Keep
  • I don't see what's so bad with it. Sure the second to last paragraph "drifts" a bit, and the last one is bad, but the idea is there. Also, Tkf, I am the biggest Hebrew on this site. Rwoaar!. I assume that's the sound that an enormous Hebrew would make. I haven't seen a lot of Jewish sci-fi, admittedly. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
    I thought Black Jesus and White Jesus were the biggest Hebrew's on the site... --Dexter111344 18:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Can't really see why this is on here. The Oblong Lobster 12:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep A bit dumb, some cliche Jewish satire, but not bad enough to delete. Sir Roger 00:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - not too bad, but a rewrite sometime would be good. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:38, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep for "The Hebrew alphabet (Hebrew, alephbeth) is set apart from all other alphabets and wanders about in a strange land." --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete by request of the biggest Hebrew on the site. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm very much flattered. ~Jewriken.GIF 21:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 08:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Dexter111344 17:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It's kind of boring. Frankie! 20:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • I'll clarify - this is informative article on Hebrew - most of it is a Hebrew grammar lesson, which isn't accurate as well. It's really is a Wikipedia stuff more then Uncync. ~Jewriken.GIF 20:54, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
    Inaccurate? The heck, you say. So, the letter "delete" doesn't really sound like "gargoyle"? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:10, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
    The letter Zayin, which is the Hebrew Z also means penis. Now there is a practical language for you. ~Jewriken.GIF 07:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
    Note to self: Don't ever meet the Jewish Zorro. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:55, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Kept. Spang talk 11:49, 22 Jul 2007

Super Frankenstein

Keep
Delete
Comments

Krabbegat

Keep
Delete
Comments

Tatsumaru

Keep
Delete
  • Delete From Lounge. For an article about a ninja, Chuck Norris appears an awful lot here. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:21, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 08:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Chuck Norris is on this article 13 times. Including his two quotes right at the top. Mr. T is on there a few times, too. And despite Mr. T's and Chuck Norris's greatnest, this article sucks. --Dexter111344 18:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Fucking kill it Frankie! 20:22, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Solid Snake

Keep
  • Matt, do you have a sexually active relationship or at least any kind of social life? Keep.--TravisBatos 20:16, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
No. The Oblong Lobster 17:25, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Just randomnees of the weakest order. The Oblong Lobster 18:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 08:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete whilst also fearing that this will be recreated and end up being even worse. --Dexter111344 19:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Frankie! 20:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

So, what terrible shred of humor of redirection will this one take when it's sadly deleted by morons? Perhaps Bruce Lee? Or Mr. T? Chuck Norris is already taken by the late Big Boss.--TravisBatos 20:38, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Crustaeanity

Keep
Delete
Comments

Brackety thing

Keep
Delete
  • Semi-procedural delete as nominator. I say semi-procedural because the related page Other brackety thing was deleted at QVFD. The contents of the pages are basically {{:Left-wing}}{{alphabet}} and {{:Right-wing}}{{alphabet}} respectively, but by checking Brackety thing's history, this was apparently Keitei's idea, so I feel this needs a full discussion. --Pentium5dot1 01:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Dexter111344 01:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:40, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Frankie! 02:45, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Why not. Let's clear up another one off Short Pages. Good work with the template Pentium. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:10, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Doesn't do anything for me. Doesn't even smile.The Oblong Lobster 19:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 08:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:34, 20 July 2007
Comments

Democratic Republic of Sunshine Mediocrity

Keep
  • Keep I thought it was quite good. Did my usual trick of giving it a good scalping - see if that looks any better now...? --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:07, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Uncyc's in a good way if today's offerings of deletion bait are anything to go by. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:33, 20 July 2007
  • Strong Keep so it needs some rehab - this is an easy rewrite - and the concept is very good. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 11:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • 2005cruft, Randomcruft --General Insineratehymn 00:59, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Just because those people are mediocre, doesn't mean this article should be. The article should be funny, not boring. Also, don't forget the redirect. --Dexter111344 16:51, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:10, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Frankie! 02:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 19:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete One of the most boring things I've ever read. Sir Roger 23:47, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Ted McGinley

Keep
  • It's not great, but it's not crap. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I think it should stay/To delete it would be gay. That rhymes, so it must be true. ThisIsMyUsername 04:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Like Wikipedia's article on him, it must be improved. --Dexter111344 16:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep Frankie! 02:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep The article is a perfect example of satire - the irony of it - and evidently lost on some people - is that Ted McGinley isn't Larry Olivier and the article is as entertaining as Ted McGinley's career has been. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 12:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I'm taking Prettiest's word for it that I just don't get it. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:35, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Shaggy Dog Story

Keep
  • Let's see you write an original shaggy dog story as good as this one then. Spang talk 04:54, 18 Jul 2007
  • Strong keep --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 15:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - And move to Illogicopedia. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong keep It's a good story, and probably the longest and therefore best shaggy dog story you're ever likely to find to put on this page. I don't particularly care if it is plagiarised (we seem to make the odd exception, with acknowledgement). This hasn't got acknowledgement on the actual page yet (although it is on the talk page courtesy of me), but it comes from the "longest joke in the world" page, where I believe it is an original and not very old - I'm sure if the authors knew about us they'd agree to have it up here. So basically, I think at least we should keep until someone thinks of a better one, if such a thing exists! Oh and also, this story reminds me of the time I took the bus to Ogdenville, which in those days was called Nash-county. You could get their for a sixpence with enough over to... --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep 'Tis funny. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:27, 20 July 2007

Strong Keep Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 12:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete
  • Long, ugly, and plagiarized (see its talk page for details). --General Insineratehymn 00:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Down with plagiarism! Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • As much as I'd like there to be at least a few shaggy dog pages on Uncyc, I'd rather they be original shaggy dog stories. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Long, boring, plagerized all-in-one! And for an added bonus, we'll throw in a crappy, unfunny punchline! --Dexter111344 16:14, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
    Yeah, um...it's a shaggy dog story, eh. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Frankie! 02:52, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete If it wasn't copied from another site then I'd vote keep. But it isn't so I wont. The Oblong Lobster 19:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Only original work on Uncyclopedia, please. Sir Roger 00:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Also, I can't believe you used "long" as a reason for deletion. Perhaps you'd also like to delete AAAAAAAAA! because it contains the letter A? Spang talk 04:56, 18 Jul 2007
  • If it goes (which it shouldn't) Spang you can at least sub the contents into that forum topic it's in. You know, so as not to create any red links or anything. But to be honest, the fact that it's templated from there might be reason enough to keep it. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:18, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • If we don't have a policy about plagiarism, we should. As I understand, it's a copyright violation unless it's a relatively short, referenced quote. I doubt it's legal for us to keep this; anthing like this should be deleted on sight. Sir Roger 15:21, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • You'll notice that even the site it supposedly came from says they "found it". They lay no claim to it. This joke is in fact all over the place. I'm guessing it's as much plagiarism as "why did the chicken cross the road?" is - just a lot longer. Things like this are usually passed around, and extended as they are passed on, and eventually build up to the size it is. Meaning there's probably no single author, most of those authors are anonymous and untraceable, and also meaning that such a thing is quite at home on a wiki. It's not a bad thing that it at least ended up here. If someone thinks they can write a better one, by all means go ahead and do it. Spang talk 11:10, 22 Jul 2007

All the subpages of GameFAQs

Keep
Delete
Comments

Graviton

Keep
  • Keep and tag with sciencyness. Seeing as how this sort of thing is my trade, if this proves unpopular I'm going to be morally obliged to rewrite this and save it. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep or Merge with Gravity per Strange but Untrue's comments. Supersedes my delete vote. Pentium5dot1 21:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Actually, just merge with Gravity (and let SbU work on that process). Allow a rewrite of the page about the topic suggested by Dexter111344. Pentium5dot1 00:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Move to SbU's userspace Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - As a physics student, I find these things funny. Pity me. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and just tidy up formatting, add a picture or two. Doesn't need too much work IMO ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:36, 19 July 2007
Delete
  • Delete, as per lounge request. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete Consider placing a redirect to Gravity if this gets deleted. Pentium5dot1 05:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete-2005cruft--Sir Manforman CUN 12:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete science can still be stupid. Sir Roger 22:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete or merge with gravity because this isn't the route that I'd have gone. This should have gone this route. --Dexter111344 22:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • If I don't get a chance to look at it soon and it's for the chop, sling it to the old userspace, then and I'll see what I can do. I feel the humble graviton should have an article besides Gravity. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • There is also a much crappier article titled Gravitons. That needs to be either deleted or boldly redirected, since it doesn't have enough content to be worth merging. Pentium5dot1 05:57, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Kept, and merge it if you want. Spang talk 11:16, 22 Jul 2007

Perestroika

Keep
  • Keep The transformers are only there (or not there) to make Gorbachev look silly. Which they do rather well in their way. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. I might attempt to rewrite this sometime in the future. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:17, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep The content is reasonably well written, just needs formatting, pictures and SPAG ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:54, 19 July 2007
Delete
  • commiecruft, 2006cruft, bad Transformer's jokes, and stupidity make this a great article to delete. --Dexter111344 00:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 06:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 10:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - killer froggy, just write it from scratch. Sir Roger 22:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and I agree with Rogpyvbc. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff - LONG LIVE ZIONIST MOTHERLAND!! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Frankie! 03:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Boy-bot

Keep
Delete
Comments

Super Friends

Keep
Delete
  • Delete I was gunna just nom this, but after another look, it really does suck bad enough for banishment. It might be worth an expand or rewrite tag, but I don't think so. --THINKER 05:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Blech. Somebody get this guy 5 CCs of Spellcheck, stat! --SirIsaac 13:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Chuck Norris is in the group twice. It's mainly a list of random celebrities and boob-related heroes. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  13:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • The Super Friends were cool. This article is just crap. --Dexter111344 16:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 18:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff - We already have Unoriginal. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:04, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Frankie! 02:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Poopfishing

Keep
Delete
Comments

Aston martin

Keep
Delete
Comments

Knight Watchman

Keep
Delete
  • Delete One of the stars of Big Bang Comics, whose heroes had better not be indestructible, because they're all going to find their way onto here in the next week or so. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 15:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sir Roger 21:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Overly crappy, not Overly British. --Dexter111344 22:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff - Knight Watchman: An admin with the rank of KUN or greater staying up all night to huff IPcruft. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Frankie! 02:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Monkey Blower

Keep
Delete
  • Delete You couldn't make it up. Well maybe you could - I can't be bothered to find out. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 15:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sir Roger 21:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Why was this never ICU'd? Oh well. Doesn't matter. It's gonna get deleted soon anyway. --Dexter111344 22:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Why you so Stupid?! - You no hungry for Monkey Blower, You hungry for... HOT POCKET! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:19, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • What the fuck is this? Frankie! 03:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Angie Cheung

Keep
Delete
Comments

Transcription

Keep
Delete
Comments

Metal Gear Solid

Keep
Delete
  • Delete, as per lounge request. A game like this deserves a much better article and surely not this mess. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Normally I'd say: "Keep, because if we we strike it down it will come back far more terrible than we could possibly imagine." However, I suspect this is already roughly as bad as it's getting. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:18, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 15:05, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Nobody seems to put ANY effort into video game articles. The Oblong Lobster 18:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This is crap. It can't get worse. --Dexter111344 22:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Give it a quick and painless death --General Insineratehymn 22:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Yeah. Good game. Bad article. De-1337. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:46, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Rush

Keep
Delete
  • Delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, but without prejudice against recreation as a different subject (e.g. Mega Man's robot-dog helper). Pentium5dot1 05:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 15:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, unless something funny could be done such as merging it with Rush Limbaugh. Spikebrennan 21:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Great band, terrible article. --General Insineratehymn 21:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Dexter111344 22:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Rush rocks! FUCK WHOEVER WROTE THIS ARTICLE. FUCK THEM IN THEIR DELETE. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Tom Cruz

Keep
Delete
  • Delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Pangusto 03:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Ranty anti-Tom-ness. Doesn't even bother calling him a hybrid of Tom and Penelope, which would have at least injected some originality in here. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 15:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Forkcruft --General Insineratehymn 19:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Dexter111344 22:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Leeroy ‘Po-boy’ Brown

Keep
Delete
Comments

Massassi

Keep
Delete
  • Vanitycruft --General Insineratehymn 19:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Murder! Murder! Murder! And kill! Kill! Kill! --Dexter111344 21:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • DELETE I'll be honest I didn't read it all. But I read enough. The Oblong Lobster 22:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 02:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete--Scott 03:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Standardly unfunny forum or website thing. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

UnNews:PacMan Wanted In Connection To Shooting

Keep
  • Keep I don't see the problem here. --THINKER 04:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • It's not crap. A bit random, perhaps, but so is my sock drawer. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and ban Deathwatch. He's doing this because I put him on Ban Patrol. Fucking jackass. --Dexter111344 04:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep How come no one has nominated "Man gets stuck in dogflap" instead of this? --SirIsaac 20:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I quite like it. The Oblong Lobster 20:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Wasabi

Keep
Delete
Comments

West Hollywood

Keep
Delete
  • Should have been deleted in March. --Dexter111344 00:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 11:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Don't know why it should have been deleted in March. Maybe it just feels like March would be more appropriate for deleting such an article. I think we need to just take a big gulp of air and whack this dead cat in the month of July. This July. The one right now...NOW!The Oblong Lobster 22:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Check the history and you'll see why. --Dexter111344 23:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Template:123

Keep
  • Keep I don't know why I like it; I certainly don't understand it, but it's bin. The Oblong Lobster 22:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

GBM University

Keep
Delete
Comments

Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris

Keep
Delete
Comments

Spank

Keep
Delete
Comments

Flyertalk

Keep
Delete
Comments

Cherry

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Worst sex joke ever. --Dexter111344 04:30, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 06:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 11:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete As if it wasn't bad enough, a Russian Reversal piece of goat-crap is slotted in by some lazy monkey-spooner. The Oblong Lobster 22:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Waka laka

Keep
Delete
  • Delete as nominator. If you want an article on an individual DDR song, it needs to be a more notable one, and it needs to be done much better. Otherwise, just see the main DDR article. Pentium5dot1 01:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sir Roger 01:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Craplist coming from the guy that loves lists... --Dexter111344 01:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Wow... Uh. Yeah. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Yeah, really dumb list. ----OEJ 01:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Man, that was fast. Thank you for keeping Uncyclopedia clean. (The article has already been deleted as of this comment.) Pentium5dot1 05:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Camera phone

Keep
  • Keep The content was quite good although it was rather ranty. I did a little restyling, and I think it's better now. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Techcruft --Dexter111344 00:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Bad. Very bad --Pangusto 06:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 06:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 11:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The author really did seem quite angry about 320x200 pictures. Resolution rage! The Oblong Lobster 22:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Vita-Man

Keep
Delete
  • Herocruft & 2006cruft --Dexter111344 00:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Short, picless, not very coherent. ----OEJ 01:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Bad jokes. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 06:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 11:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Unpronounceableslavian

Keep
Delete
  • Countrycruft Pure and utter crap. --Dexter111344 00:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Could be good, but definitely isn't. ----OEJ 01:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 06:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 10:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It could of been better.--Scott 13:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Pure cock. The Oblong Lobster 22:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Malachy

Keep
Delete
  • Vanity --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:30, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • So you want to be a sweet MC, in the 3-1-3? None of these skills that you about to see come free. Oh, and delete. --Dexter111344 01:14, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Holy hamhocks, Batman, that is the worst excuse for an article I have seen in a long time. ----OEJ 01:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • De1337 --General Insineratehymn 06:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 10:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Milky

Keep
Delete
  • Delete --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Dexter111344 01:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Really quite bad, short, poorly formatted, and did I say bad? ----OEJ 01:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 07:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 10:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

The God Couple

Keep
Delete
Comments

Ogame

Keep
Delete
  • Someone tried to QVFD it today, and, quite frankly, I was tempted. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Zombie, you should have. --Dexter111344 01:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Well, it's awfully long for QVFD. But the writing is bad and the article is not funny or intelligently satirical. ----OEJ 01:20, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 06:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 10:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Aer Lingus

Keep
Deathwatch did create the page(therefore, he is the original author), but the most of the article was written by a different author. It still isn't funny, --Dexter111344 17:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Orders of solicitor Rod Dadak.--Deathwatch2006 05:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't care if anyone thinks it's salvageable. The original author posted this on here(even if it is just out of spite) and really should have been put on QVFD. Oh, and it's crap. Keep the part that's in cunnilingus.--Dexter111344 20:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Okay - can I remove Aer Lingus from here? --Deathwatch2006 05:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC).
  • Oh, I don't know, abstain. Just stop being so petulant, Deathwatch - one minute you decide your stuff is brilliant and it needs to be in ten places at once, and the next you want to delete every last scrap. This has happened twice now and I'm fed up of dealing with it. Like I've said, you can be funny if you stop concentrating on things that bother you, like Rochdale, and you don't go over the top. I think that the bit of this that is also a section of cunnilingus is very good, the rest of it maybe tries a bit too hard. But I won't vote on it because you're annoying me and I think my judgement is a bit off as a result. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 07:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
You're only obeying orders.--Deathwatch2006 11:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Wow. You managed to annoy Sbu. She's the closest thing we have to a teddy bear! Button eyes and a little bowtie and everything. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Sounds familiar.--Deathwatch2006 03:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
I think she might be a furry. This would explain why I keep seeing her at the meetings. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
A furry is someone who says and does exactly as he is told, and lies about it?--Deathwatch2006 04:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Furry. Also, what? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
I don't want to deal with your abuse. I've heard most of it before, verbatim.--Deathwatch2006 07:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
I've been abusive? Sorry, Mr. 2006, but I'm going to have to call shenanigans on that one. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Yes.--Deathwatch2006 08:04, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Hey everybody! Vote Deathwatch! --THINKER 09:45, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Update: User banned for two years by somebody or other. Let that be a lesson to somebody else or other about something or other. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
By the way, I think he thinks I'm this solicitor guy Rod Dadak. In case that helps clear up any confusion. Poor guy suffers from sleep apnea according to his website, which is probably why he looks a bit loopy at first glance. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Peter Ebdon

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Cut and paste some of OEJ's comments on those other articles right here. I hear he's a snooker though, which sounds.. interesting.. --THINKER 00:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Oh, and that's a bad miss... [/joke that very very few people will get] --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • MISS MISS MISS MISSS MISS MISS *Article dies* Yes, that's from Trauma Center. No, the "misses" don't mean women. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 05:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 09:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Yuck. ----OEJ 12:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I don't see what any of this has to do with Peter Ebdon. This sucks. -- Hindleyite Converse 15:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Frankie! 20:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Ol' Fashion Delete --Dexter111344 20:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Broken Redirect

Keep
Delete
  • Delete There's already too many of these sorts of pages. Undeleted and listed here on Sbu's request. --Algorithm 00:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

HowTo:chat up a woman

Keep
  • Keep, but lose the Prostitution section. Which is what I said to my choir. Hardest thing I ever had to do. Now they're out on the street... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:13, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete One more. The author has been sticking that "Prostitution" section anywhere he can find, and I'm sick of deleting it from random articles. It also pushed this one over the edge to extreme awfulness. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • No This is just crap. --Dexter111344 20:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Just stupid. Sir Roger 06:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Frankie! 07:17, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Thanks, but please see my talk page.--Deathwatch2006 04:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Super Monkey Ball 3

Keep
Delete
Comments

George Jefferson

Keep
Delete
Comments

Obake no Q-tarō

Keep
Delete
Comments

Bawls

Keep
Delete
  • Delete A little funless misinformation about Bawls. Or cojones. Or something. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Obviously a semidecent writer without the ability to be funny. Saddens me in a way. --THINKER 02:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 09:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Bawlete Were they trying to write about the energy drink? --Dexter111344 21:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Short and not funny. ----OEJ 00:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Frankie! 07:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:28, 15 July 2007
Comments

AMB

Keep
  • Keep...The article is written in bad English, but Wickedpedia has article on him. I favor more articles on foreign politicians. Americans think Rudy Giuliani is all hawt and sexy, but other countries have public figures too ya know. (Will rewrite article on demand...) ----OEJ 00:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete Mystifying acrocruft. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I guess it's a rant against a Lithuanian politician - it doesn't even do well at being very insulting though. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 09:29, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • We're sorry, but the funny you were looking for could not be found. Please check the article and try again. If you need help, call up 911 and quit bothering us. Thank you, and have a bad day. --Dexter111344 21:10, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Frankie! 07:49, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:27, 15 July 2007
Comments

ABBA

Keep
  • Keep Someone may care to turn the article into something worthwhile. "Do you know who my father is," arises because the brunette discovered her father as a result of her fame, an officer in Hitler's Army.--Deathwatch2006 06:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Pan's Labyrinth: G'day USA!

Keep
Delete
Comments

Widely Considered

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Short, unfocused, unnecessary. Stub-tagged but never expanded. ----OEJ 22:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff Too short. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 08:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Undictionary??? Yes, no, maybe so? --Dexter111344 21:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:29, 15 July 2007
Comments
  • This can now be found in Undictionary. Thank you for shopping at Uncyclopedia, your source for the crappiest best content in the world. --Dexter111344 20:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Lasagne

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Underdeveloped: short, marginally coherent, picless. ----OEJ 22:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Lasagne's a person?? --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • D-lete Though I might use the first quote to my advantage elsewhere. --THINKER 06:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 08:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Doesn't do that good of a job blurring the food with the James Bond villian so delete. --Dexter111344 21:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 08:53, 15 July 2007
  • Delete Frankie! 23:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Jewenese

Keep
  • Weak Keep doesn't offend me... is a pretty decent delivery, but obviously needs more. --THINKER 06:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

DragonForce

Keep
  • Weak Keep pending cleanup. I don't really follow the logic of typical Uncyc deletionism (can I please see a delete vote with an explanation?), and the only major problem I see right now is some dumb images. Pee Review maybe? Pentium5dot1 17:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Ditto I did like the typical song in tab form bit. I tried to play it, until my fingers started to bleed. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Rewrite Their songs actually do set people on fire though. This could be very funny without total overhaul or deletion. Oh, and my picture of the dragon jedi is genius. --THINKER 22:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - meh, I don't mind stuff like this. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - I love it, it just needs a bit of a fixup here and there. --Theotherwhitemeat 15:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep It's horrendous, but their loyal fan-writers have earned them a keep vote. At least some people like it. Sir Roger 06:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • In re Pentium5dot1's query: being born in a special act of creation by God is cliché. Chuck Norris is a worn-out meme. "Various unrelated things" is generally termed randumb and it's neither interesting nor funny. The lead paragraph is nonsense: it says the group is a research team but the rest of the article is about a band. The guitar tab bit is crappily formatted. And the article is filled with fancruft claiming that the band's songs are so powerful they set people on fire, kill grues, cause power failures, etc. OK, golly, we get it -- two or three fanboys think the band rocks. But in the end, who cares? ----OEJ 01:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I have placed a rewrite tag on the article so that people not monitoring VFD will be more aware of the need for a rewrite. Pentium5dot1 22:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects