This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFD.
Keep Actually it comes from a song by a contestant on X-factor in the UK: Wikipedia:It's Chico Time "The general theme of the song is to not take life too seriously and just party, as life is too short." -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* Chico Time 3 July 2007 (CT)
Aww. Okay Strange. --Dexter111344 13:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
I wonder if someone from Chico State made this. Chico State is California State University for those who don't know. Also, remember to add the VFD template to the page. Otherwise, it won't get deleted. --Dexter111344 04:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete Is this seriously just a recipe? I feel like I'm missing something important. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep because I didn't know that goat's cheese tends to lose traction when cornering, or that the queen drives a blue transit. Never been to Droitwich, but I still laughed. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Scrap. Towncruft is the worst cruft. It's also the only cruft I admit to calling "cruft" --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 13:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Execute - Yes, a sad sad sequel to the Capercorn Nazi War Crime Trials. This is a leftover article that I forgot to have huffed. Just Kill it and get an award. --CapercornFLAME!what?UNATOOWS 17:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Why do I care about the troll or this website? Oh yeah, I don't. --Dexter111344 22:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete Was almost going to go for a very weak keep until the article assaulted me with the names of 60 people I'd never heard of. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete & might I also recommend deleting Yo Face also? Maybe put it up here once this gets deleted? I'm going to forget about it. --Dexter111344 02:03, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete Nice try, but doesn't work. RabbiTechno 13:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Crap List Whomever wrote that is an idiot. --Dexter111344 03:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Conditional delete. This be turned into a redirect to a more fitting page, to prevent mass red linkage. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:48, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
My grandfather was a great man! He would walk around telling teenage girls that he had $100 in his pocket and all they had to do was reach in and get it. But when they reached in, they soon realized he had a hole in his pocket and he wasn't wearing any underwear! But he didn't have to resort to tricks like that! He could get it whenever he wanted from any women! Sorry about the rant. But seriously, that joke is funnier than anything on that page, which is extremely sad. --Dexter111344 22:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Strong keep Displays as much funny misunderstanding of America as people think you misunderstand the world. Don't misunderstand this article by deleting it! Could do with a bit of pruning though. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep - Normaly my inner neo-con kicks in on articles like this, but the image on how various different people view america made me want to keep. Prunage is good. --CapercornFLAME!what?UNATOOWS 23:35, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep. Delete the stupid, preserve the funny and you've got a decent page. --SirIsaac 00:56, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep and Rewrite - Somewhat self-referential. Could be featured with some improvements. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 05:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Keepbecause the Secret Service guy has a gun to my head I mean, because America is great! Yeah... Let's go with that... --Dexter111344 21:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Without this page, the cruft contained within would be forced to spread to other pages. Do you really want that? Also, while it's not a good page, there are some good lines. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 08:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete The odd good idea in it, but I think it could do with destroying and converting into a conservatory. The Oblong Lobster 17:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Not remotely funny. Redirect to American (Species). Sir Roger 02:01, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Comment - I think I might do a rewrite of this for PLS. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 05:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Ok, so most of it is blatent hatred of americans. A fair share of it was true, and funny. Many pictures were also very funny. And hey, if I wasn't american, I'd probably be loving this article. Our foreign policies suck, our government can suck most of the time, and we always are meddling in everyone's affairs. So, yeah, take out some of the more blatent hatred, and this article will be pretty good. And BTW, what about french, british, germans? They all are the same way as this article. Huffing this one would mean all of those ones would be deleted, and they are really good. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 15:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Ok look. This article makes all the same points as the one I nominated for deletion, but in a funnier, less hateful way. That's why I don't see any reason for American to exist. --PhlegmLeoispotter* (garble! jank!) 20:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Strange, I see a lot of talk about how it should be rewritten or expanded, but I don't see either of that going on in this article. Take the shit or get off the pot. --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Come on people. There is a version of this idea for EVERY single country. This isn't bad. Germans quotes that german women are a sub-human race with 2 vaginas. Americans is light on being offensive compared to the others. If this is huffed, admin may have to huff other good articles to keep the cultural divide 'fair.' I think that both articles (Americans and Americans (Species), are funny in different ways. In fact, I propose that the species are placed as a catagory under the article Americans. So, come on, please reconsider this. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 05:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete and redirect to Homosexuality Page is badly written and unfunny. It's a lightning rod for morons posting names and pictures and saying how GAY their buddies are. A vanity nightmare. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 20:46, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 20:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete and redirect --Dexter111344 21:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep, unless it's actually not funny if you know about such subjects, in which case delete. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 08:52, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete. I do know about such subjects, and it's not funny. RabbiTechno 17:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
I am an expert in this subject, and I do not find it funny. --GeneralInsineratehymn 20:54, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
I am not an expert on this subject. In fact, the closest thing to metal music for me is cello rock. But I can tell you this needs to be Deleted. --Dexter111344 21:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep A rare good example of the deity genre. I made a few changes to help it along a bit. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 10:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete One wonders if Colin Firth himself wrote this - looks like vanity. Either that or a seriously obsessed fan. RabbiTechno 10:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Blarch this serious, unsatirical essay. "Guys who think with their cocks end up in deep trouble" -from the article. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 00:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Blech. Is this idiot serious? --SirIsaac 02:35, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Deep ranting, from someone I actually hope never finds a wife, for her sake. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 10:31, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete "A false accusation of rape is much worse than rape itself..." WTF? This needs to be deleted and whoever was responsible for it needs some major electro-shock therapy. If anyone can track down the author's address, I'll be on my way round there with a generator and some genital clamps right away. RabbiTechno 10:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Bullshit. Finntastic 11:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Although it maybe the last words from someone who had a gun to their head. Don't expect anyone has missed him, and maybe deleting this will be the last act of removing him from existence. I need to shut up now. The Oblong Lobster 17:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Deadend piece of crap This isn't funny. What makes it worst, it apparently got a rewrite today, but this still isn't funny. I don't see why someone took the deadend template off, either. This either needs to be majorly rewritten, or deleted. I am leaning towards deletion. --Dexter111344 13:53, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Gah Its Just Crap (Bonner) (Talk) 18:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete, yeah, this has never been good. If someone removes a deadend template without fixing, I'll usually stick it back on within about two days. If they remove it again, I'll report them to Ban Patrol. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 05:40, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Unused at the moment, but I thought it should go separate from the others in case anybody falls madly in love with it in all its badly-Potatoed glory. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 00:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete More unused redlinky template fun. I love the fact that there appear to be no parties of note in Finland. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 00:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Sorry NXWave - your total rewrite actually made it worse, but I do agree it wasn't any good beforehand either. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete I loved the movie, though. Oh well. --Dexter111344 14:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete "He did this by raping the entire french army and by gay bashing Paris until the all Frenchmen became women" -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
This article is great to delete! --Dexter111344 14:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Dude does not look like a lady. Also, why is it that whenever I see the word "burns" I think of Mr. Burns from The Simpsons? --Dexter111344 14:20, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep Consistency is like the least important thing on Uncyc. And besides, I actually prefer this to LED. It could maybe do with a little bit of dewaffling on the first sections, but that's all. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 00:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep I might even proof-read it and sort the spellings later, if I can be bothered. RabbiTechno 11:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep. I found this one better than LED, for some reason. •••Necropaxx(T){~} 20:19, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Huff Conflicts with LED, badly written. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 23:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Me no likey --Dexter111344 14:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments
LED's? LED is what?! Me not speak english real good, but that's just wrong. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 14:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Well move it then, silly billy. Although actually, whether to stick an apostrophe after an acronym isn't completely agreed by top Englishy types. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 15:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Oh, you Earthpersons and your silly word-talking. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 15:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
I just sorted the apostrophe by moving it to LEDs. I think we're free of double-redirects, but I don't do a lot of moving, so if someone more experienced than me would be so kind as to check it'd be much appreciated :) RabbiTechno 13:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Shouldn't be here, as it's still got a construction tag on and was written within the last seven days. Ah, I see, it's been huffed and replaced with new stuff. I think this entry counts as closed as a result. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:40, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete A bunch of templatey stuff designed for articles that don't exist any more. If there's any contention, I'll split them up into separate VFD boxes. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 16:47, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 18:12, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete I once had a supervisor named Moran. She wasn't stupid, though. Don't know why you really need to know this; just thought I'd mention it. Sir Roger 23:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep You have not given any reason aside from meaningless, "had enough debating" and "not good." --Deathwatch2006 01:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Worth keeping for this line: Rule, Britannia! Britannia, waives the rules! -- HindleyiteConverse 10:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. It's the only line I want (the rest is padding - which I've tried to make worthwhile. --Deathwatch2006 14:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
I think this is the problem really. Without exception, padding something out when it's really only designed to be one line long never produces anything worthwhile. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Which, it's worth noting, is actually from Spike Milligan's first volume of war memoirs. -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. I didn't know. Spike was a good man, sadly missed.
Delete
Delete I've had enough debating with the author, so I'll let you lot decide. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 15:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete. A few pictures and some reproduced lyrics do not an article make. -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
You don't understand: it's not volume, but quality. The line "Britannia waives the rules" (Spike Milligan) needs preservation - many who live in Britain understand and appreciate it. --Deathwatch2006 14:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Au contraire; as well as being a native of these fair isles, I understand very well the (flexible) line between quantity and quality. However, to be brutally honest, this article falls short on both counts, as per SbU's comment in the above section. -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 23:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete We can surely find a use for that rather attractive 'British virgin' though...RabbiTechno 11:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
I was trying to rescue her from the late Brunettes (now deleted). --Deathwatch2006 14:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete I moved most of it to TFAODP, because it sounds like it wants to be true even if it isn't. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 16:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete I'm for deleting any mention emo stuff. --Dexter111344 17:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete I don't understand why I dislike this. It just whispers "Rubbish" in my ear. Maybe my ear is made of rubbish, and it's just commenting? -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 16:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete I'm sorry that that cat is so cute, it deserves to have it's page, but it can't. IT'S VANITY!!! Go look for people on MySpace to think your so adorable, FUCKER! --SirManforman 20:50, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Huff - If ur going to make an article on evil Cats who want to rule the world, do on the one from Cats vs. Dogs. --CapercornFLAME!what?UNATOOWS 03:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Going by the title, I had assumed that this would be a page about my penis. Needless to say, I was disappointed. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 08:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Screams promise, delivers cock! The Oblong Lobster 11:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Pimmeh -- sadly, an article needs to have a special spark in order to get people other than the primary author interested in rewriting it. If you want to work on Mr. Bigglesworth then it would be good to move a copy to your userspace (as a registered member you can do that: one way to do it is to create a new article, User:Pimmeh/Mr. Bigglesworth and copy the existing article's text into the new page). But as it stands now the article is not very solid. ----OEJ 17:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete I think this is what you'd have to call "Jargoncruft". Details someone's valiant struggle with tech problems, and as such is completely incomprehensible. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 16:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete Yay! VFD space! Anyway, this one's another of those detailed mythologies that's not actually funny. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 16:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete "what started out at first as a somewhat friendly debate but ended up an aggressive round of fisticuffs with Bill Murray knocking him down before straddling and pounding him to death and then eating him". -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 17:31, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete Is this our first 2006cruft? Anyway, even good ol' American stereotypes aren't dumb enough for that map... -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 17:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep Maybe it's just the picture messing with my head, but I laughed. And then I changed the page to freak myself out some more. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 17:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete At first, I thought this might be a funny list like one of the Worst 100. Sadly, it isn't. Don't forget the redirect. --Dexter111344 17:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Roundhouse kick till its explodes causing another Big Bang that ends up creating another universe inside this universe thus causing this universe's existence to be nulified. Didn't get that? Well, I didn't get that article, so we're even! --Dexter111344 18:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Not that bad and this doesn't have the VFD template on it. Not only that but you really should have waited til there was space on here for this. --Dexter111344 04:20, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep I really hate that animation, but this is the one place I've seen it where it actually made me laugh. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 10:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Not awful Compared to some shit we keep, it's fine. --SirIsaac 19:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)