Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive73

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.

Contents

Your Semen Tastes Godly

Keep
Delete
  • Blarch Self-explanatory. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I'm not even reading the article. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 01:23, 04 June 2007
  • GWB should not have released this album --Dexter111344 01:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff - This is just plain old disgusting. However quite sutible for this. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 02:12, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sir Roger 02:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Gee, it spells out ANAL SEX in bold letters. How cool is that?----OEJ 02:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Make it eat its own semen. --General Insineratehymn 02:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Now this is original cruft. ~Jewriken.GIF 09:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Album-listing-cruft. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:15, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Ewwww... TheSlyFox 10:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

QWERTYUIOPASDFGHJKLZXCVBNM

Keep
Delete
Comments

DADR

Keep
Delete
Comments

Starcraft 2

Keep
  • Keep - It is still under ICU. Wait for the tenth for Our Glourious Benovelent Admins For The People to kill the article. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 02:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as above Sir Roger 02:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep ICUed. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete The page, quite frankly, sucks, and is going to be a prime target for vandals. Delete it, and let me stick something there from 2nd Korean War. Railcgun 22:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Amazing ly bad. How can you do a page on Starcraft 2 without once mentioning Blizzard? /boggle. Put something, ANYTHING in its place as it WILL be vandalised frequently and without ceasing for many months/years to come. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 01:02, 04 June 2007
  • Lynch --Dexter111344 02:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Even though it's still under ICU rule, I think there is no chance of anything coming out of it. ~Jewriken.GIF 09:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

You know, sometimes I hate the ICU process. Similar to my dislike of the construction and crap tags, I hate waiting a week to delete something everyone knows is rubbish and unlikely to be improved in one week. Just my whinge for the day! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:39, 04 June 2007

Don't worry about it. The thing you have to remember is that the number of people who'll actually see an ICUed article before it gets deleted is minimal. Ironically, they get many times more views when somebody decides to stick one on VFD. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Ichiro Suzuki

Keep
Delete
  • Scrap --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 22:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete As a cellist, I was hoping this article would have to do with the guy who created the Suzuki Method of learning how to play a musical instrument. Alas, it is an unfunny article about the baseball player. --Dexter111344 22:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete You play the cello? Wow! I love the sound of the cello, I think its beautiful :) Sadly the only example I can think of is the lilting strains of the Silvermoon City ambient music. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:59, 04 June 2007
  • Delete And I agree, the Cello is great. Sir Roger 02:38, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. The article, not the cello. ----OEJ 02:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Also delete the viola, because being forced to play that was the reason I stopped playing strings. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Jesse Morrin

Keep
Delete
  • Delete, I'm sorry to say. While not vanity, it's extremely random. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I was going to put his up for deletion after I reviewed it, but there were already 15 articles being voted on. --Dexter111344 22:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I too considered putting it up here when I refused to review it on advice from IRC chat :) ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:50, 04 June 2007
Comments

Hogtown

Keep
Delete
  • Worthless --General Insineratehymn 21:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Imaginecruft. No relation to anything whatsoever. Delete --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:50, 04 June 2007
  • Kill This was stupid. It should have been huffed when it was created. --Dexter111344 01:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Though not entirely of no relation to anything. The town is Toronto, the phallic symbol is the CN Tower, and I imagine the breast is the baseball stadium. Sir Roger 02:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as we already have an utterly indigestible article on Toronto. ----OEJ 02:58, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Nothing much to laugh at. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Captain Falcon

Keep
Delete
  • Delete by request --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 21:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and then beg somebody to rewrite it --KATIE!! 22:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • This pains me as a Nintendo fanboy but an article about the great F-Zero racer should actually be funny, not stupid.--Dexter111344 22:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 01:59, 04 June 2007
  • Delete Sir Roger 02:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • FALCON PUNCH this shit out of existence. --General Insineratehymn 02:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Gravy boat

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Doesn't really communicate the majesty or excitement of a Gravy Boat. The Oblong Lobster 21:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete you can say that again...Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Baleet. I have a lurking suspicion that last picture has little to do with the actual article. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 22:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Gravy! Sadly, this doesn't show how great Gravy Boats are. --Dexter111344 22:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Correction: If your pron is lost you should NOT WRITE STUPID ARTICLES LIKE THIS ONE!!! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:40, 04 June 2007
  • Delete Sir Roger 02:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Drown it in its own gravy --General Insineratehymn 02:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. You know, the delete-mechanism is pretty good really. I had just randomed to this page and thought, This belongs on VFD and lo and behold here it is. ----OEJ 02:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Sony BREW Ninja

Keep
Delete
Comments

Person

Keep
  • Keep Quite funny. I'd probably remove the last couple of sections though. But then I am diseased, apparently. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Pokemon

Keep
  • Keep I don't see a problem with this article. First its a topic that we're going to have, it isn't vanity, etc. It shouldn't be on the VFD radar screen. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Not too bad - I wouldn't say no to a rewrite if it was better, but I don't object to this being here either. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • This is an article made by admins to stop a group of IPs and users from bitching that the pokemon page sucked. The admins, forgetting about the page accidentally, never came back to realize that it devolved into gay and sex jokes. I could place an ICU on it. But I made a more appropriate page Pokemon (Show) before it, so that would be redundant. I could move it to an area where it won't bother anyone (such as Pokemon (The gay and sex jokes version)). But they have gone on article talk pages such as pokemon (show) proclaiming that their page is the best of Uncyclopedia, and mine should be deleted. I guess we just can't remove unedittable blocks, lest this happens again. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service)
  • Redirect to either Pokémon or Pokemon (Show). Probably all variants of Pokemon ought to redirect to one or the other of these locations. Contain the damage. ----OEJ 18:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
    But then how will we collect them all? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC) I can't believe I just said that
      • I'm sure that we probably have as many Pokemon articles as there Pokemon. Which is exactly 5 million, 4 hundred and seventy-three. Plus Mew and Missingno. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:23, 04 June 2007
  • Oh no, I keep all of the pokemon pages on my watch list to revert vandalism. If it isn't on the pokemon template, it doesn't exist. This one is the only article I don't want to deal with. I still have to go over a few more and rewrite one or two pokemon pages, but I built a lot of this area from ground up. Hence my siggy. I like pokemon, and when I first logged in, I realised that there were maybe 7 articles about how gay Ash was, which I fixed up.
    There are, unfortunately, three main articles on pokemon. One is a template, one is a collection of bad jokes, and one is my failed attempt at satire after it was editted hundreds of times. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service)
  • Gone and back again. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Naruto

Keep
  • Keep See below. And deleting it is not going to stop its devilish spawn from appearing regularly, UF. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I vouch for the majority of this article being funny and not just stupid (since I wrote most of it myself I am obviously unbiased and able to pass impartial judgment in this regard). Naruto is a very big and popular manga, and the humor in the page is directed at people who have been following it and would appreciate the poking fun at its absurdities. Obviously this kind of humor would escape anybody else, which is why people keep dropping by the page and announcing that it does indeed OMGSUXXXOOORZZLOLZ, but the actual target audience of this article seems to react otherwise- A Google cross-search for "Naruto" and "Uncyclopedia" yields over ten thousand hits, many of which are fans of the show pffting over the article in outraged, yet amused, approval. --AceMyth 19:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Geez, can't we all just accept that mediocrity is as good as this article is going to get? I stand by my belief that as popular as this is, it needs to remain an article, and if no one has any better ideas how to do one, this is the way to go. Mr. Briggs Inc. 21:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC) Eh?
  • Oh, I love how you complain about "Mediocrity" and then go on to restore to the article such gems as "Mr. Bonejangles was once a famous Broadway dancer but after taking a can-can kick to the ass began to suffer horrible compound fractures". --AceMyth 21:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • What I just meant is that it's hardly feature quality, as it's dang hard to satire a random show about ninja, especially one vandalized every 2 seconds with useless non-non-facts about "gheyness". And those guys needed a section! Mr. Briggs Inc. 23:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC) Eh?
  • Keep -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 00:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I can appreciate deleting the kind of humour that relies on intimate fan knowledge. We need jokes that can appeal to the person sitting there going, "WTF?" The section "The Moral of The Story" delivers this. Keep --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • KEEP THIS OR ELSE!!! BELIEVE IT!!!!!--Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 03:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Sir Roger 02:12, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep If you hate anime, I'm not sure why you're voting on this. Sadly Uncyclopedia has articles on all sorts of things, not just the ones you like. And if you don't hate it... why not fix the damn article instead of bitching about it? Naruto is a widespread internet subject, and one that necessitates an article - as AceMyth pointed out, "Uncyclopedia" and "Naruto" yields over ten thousand hits. This article is going to have to exist in some form or another, so I don't know what people are trying to do by voting for deletion other then expressing their disdain of anime articles in general. Feebas factor 15:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep This article is so funny .... IO don't know why would anyone want to delete it. Uchiha Sasuke 23:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • funny in what way? please explain --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • narutocruft is now seperate from animecruft as people KEEP CREATING SHIT ARTICLES ON THE SAME SUBJECT --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • MY EYES! THE GOGGLES DO NOTHING! --General Insineratehymn 19:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Read it now..The Oblong Lobster 21:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • If I could, I would delete and CVP every anime-related article that has anything to do with an actual anime series rather than taking the entire thing into a different direction like Bleach, because the potential to create very poor cruft with an anime series is too great because the fans will almost certainly choose a poor direction to expand the article. --~ Tophatsig

    Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

    22:41, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • I agree with Jocke Pirat on this one. De-1337 this. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Don't talk, just kill. -- herr doktor needsApistol Rocket [scream!] 23:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • KILL IT then protect it from every being created again fuck your anime crap

-- Dexter User:Java7837 (contributions) (talk) (diary) 12:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Deletion with VPV is the worst possible outcome. We're voting on the article, not the TV show. Naruto is a notable subject we need an article on in some form. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 18:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I'm a Naruto fan, and this is still a bad article.--Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Wasn't this already deleted?! Roman Dog Bird 21:12, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This sucks. If only I or somebody else cared enough to write a funny Naruto-related article... It'd probably be vandalized by fanboys, though. --Dexter111344 22:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff - Pure fanboy cruft. Subject sucks. Article sucks. Redirect to Goa Tse. Protect. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 02:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • I just cannot be bothered to read this shite. And as it's been around since March 2005 and has about ten billion edits I don't feel I can vote against it with out reading it properly. The Oblong Lobster 18:06, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Righty then... I thought we had a clean of this one but I'm not so sure the cleaned version actually made it back to the page... The clean was supposed to happen in my userspace around March/April, but I think the article got recreated and worked on in the mainspace, as the page log shows. Can somebody who did the work please clarify? I'm going to vote keep on whichever version the cleaned one is, combined with any good new additions since then. It's not bad now (it's a popular subject with fans with a slightly odd sense of humour...), and might be even better if a cleaned version exists somewhere in the huff-files... --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Semiprotect. This is vandalized every two seconds by IPs, which makes up for a good amount of it's suck. Mr. Briggs Inc. 23:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC) Eh?
  • Abstain I hate hate hat anime articles, they bore me so stupid and they are constantly on here so I can't be objective about this one. Sounds like a repeat of Chuck Norris, if we huff it; it will come back again and again so the lesser of two evils is probably keep. But its gonna get messed with all the time. /sigh ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:19, 31 May 2007
  • Why don't people just vote on whether they think this article deserves to be deleted based on its quality? It seems unfair on people who worked on other deleted articles if this crap isn't deleted because people are worried it's going to be regenerated. Does it matter? If it's this crap next time it will be deleted again. The Oblong Lobster 23:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
    • See the thing about democracy is that you can vote or not vote for whatever reasons you like. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:54, 01 June 2007
  • Can't we just CVP this page?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Naruto Policy I demand a naruto policy see User:Java7837/narutosucks
  • look, this had its chance to redeem itself but it never did... so... --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Abstain Not sure whether anyone will create anything better. I gave this a major edit, removing paragraphs I thought irredeemably inaccessible. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Deletion Imminent - but I'm trying to do some behind-the-scenes work to avoid having a blank page there which will fill up with the same pile of garbage within 10 seconds of it being cleared away. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 06/3 13:53
  • Gone. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

The Larch

Keep
  • Strong keep Good python parody - I like it better than the original sketch! --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep It's quite interesting. The Oblong Lobster 18:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Possibly confusing to those who have not seen the Python episode, but funny in an off-the-wall way. ----OEJ 00:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Not really VFD material. Not everyone has to like the style of huomour to keep. Sir Roger 01:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Doesn't hurt to have the occasional weird-ass page here for people to stumble across. I don't know that it's funny, but it's definitely not vanity, and it seems to be 100% original, outside of the 10 second MP clip which seems to have inspired it. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 06/2 13:03
  • Keep - There's much worse around. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 10:39
Delete
Comments
  • Comment: Oddly, this is not, as it may seem, vanity. At least, not all of it. I'd say it's more likely a Monty Python reference. And now, number one, the larch. But, on the whole, it's still not that good of an article. And now, number one, the larch. The larch. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 08:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Abstain Don't know the reference so couldn't say if its good or bad. I didn't get it nor enjoy it personally though. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:48, 31 May 2007
  • Whoops Didn't realize this was a Monty Python reference. I still think it sucks though. At least get rid of the pictures.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Gone. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Gobbledy gook

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • I might propose a Reverse Turing Test for nonsense articles: if one can fairly easily write a program that will turn out prose as "good" as that in the article then the article fails the test. In other words, if a computer with a minimally sophisticated program can write the article then the article is not creative. ----OEJ 19:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
    Oh noes! OEJ has reverse engineered my system! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Simple Minds

Keep
Delete

Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:50, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Eugene Terreblanche

Keep
Delete
Comments

Terence

Keep
Delete
Comments

Bro rape

Keep
Delete
Comments

Forgotten Sound Era Cartoons

Keep
Delete
Comments

Halo

Keep
Delete
Comments

Cory Fuka

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Huh! Might be vanity, might be cyberbullying...Google says Cory Fuka posts comments on various sites having to do with comicbook art and the drawing thereof. But I don't think he's a 'notable person' in quite the way we would want. ----OEJ 02:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

East Virginia

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Comment - Well at least it appears that someone gave this some thought. Its not wholly unredeemable (but I have no interest in redeeming it). Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Robbie savage

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Deleted. Rather boring and not particularly funny. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Albert Lea

Keep
Delete
  • Delete This isn't funny. The only funny part of this article is the .gif of the dancing cat(I thought it was a monkey at first).--Dexter111344 00:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Wrong That part wasn't funny either. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 01:44, 02 June 2007
  • Delete I have to agree, the dancing cat really isn't funny, at least in this context. Sir Roger 02:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff –—Hv (talk) 2/06 11:06
  • Kill it and the dancing cat. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 21:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Flossin' --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 00:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Not funny at all. Delete. --Scout JoshHJ's Page and His Talk 00:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Quite a lot of mediocre writing, and a not-funny premise. ----OEJ 02:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Deleted. What's up with the dancing cat gif? As a stand alone image it's pretty funny. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Naruto: The TV Show

Keep
Delete

(diary) 12:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Holocaust Tycoon

Keep
  • Delete and die. You've got to be joking. The ability to turn anything into a joke is what makes Uncyclopedia beautiful. Don't delete this on some guy's family's whim. Call me an asshole. Exercise your freedom of speech. Then let others do the same. Lord Gneo 07:59, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Is nothing sacred? Er, now you mention it, no. Carry on. ----OEJ 00:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • No way. That's our cult de les cults. -- herr doktor needsApistol Rocket [scream!] 00:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Already had this discussion, and it got featured. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 01:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Are you kidding me? 90 percent of my entire extended family was killed in the Holocaust but I've still got a sense of humor. Do something about that incredibly funky sig too. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 00:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • congratulations, you have been accepted into Taking A Joke class --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:57, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Nope, nothing's sacred here. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 00:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Another censor. Please read Uncyclopedia:Content Disclaimer. If you don't like the way we do things here after reading that, then maybe this website isn't for you. --Hrodulf 00:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Hey Java, take a fucking joke. Also, I'm telling Famine about your screwed-up sig. --General Insineratehymn 01:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • My grandmother was enslaved by an SS soldier until he blew his brains out in 1945, but that makes no difference. Learn to laugh. --~ Tophatsig

    Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

    01:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Oh, and Keep absolutely --THINKER 02:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • For the sake of Das Fuhur - THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED!11! KEEP! Capercorn 02:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete Clever and funny The Oblong Lobster 09:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • DELIST it's a featured page and it's funny ROFL.--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E Snowman throw a snowball Snowman 13:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep: It's not that bad. Lawl. I'm funny. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 17:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep: Dude, I'm really sorry about your family. The Holocaust was a terrible thing and no one is trying to say otherwise. However, laughing about it isn't in any way disrespecting the past. Moving on is an important part of grieving, and if you can't laugh at it, you obviously haven't gotten that far.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep We aren't here to be PC; we are here to be funny. This is funny.--Dexter111344 00:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Dexter, I'm sure someone else has said this, but I can't be bothered to read all of the comments. This article is not poking fun at the Holocaust in a malicious way, it's poking fun at the capatalist companies that will take advantage of anything to make money, no matter how bad the subject is. Or, that's how I read it anyway. I'm glad for one thing though, that you took it to discussion rather than just blanking the article. —Braydie 00:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep See comments section. --Naughtius Maximus Leaf F@H Woof!Za slice MeowMUN 01:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Yeah well, I bet Oprah would get pretty pissed if she read her article. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service)
  • Keep it and I think that we will. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:10, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep –—Hv (talk) 2/06 21:18
  • Keep Roman Dog Bird 21:49, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • This is very offensive there are things that should not be made fun of. My relatives were killed like beasts and you dare try to make it into a joke -- Dexter User:Java7837 (contributions) (talk)(diary) 00:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment I'm not going to be a cock about this, but how that Dexter picture okay for a sig and my old Thinker icon was too big? --THINKER 01:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
    (though there are a number of other users still breaking the 15px rule --THINKER)
  • Comment I really wish people would avoid VFD noms like this, that have no chance and just waste everyone's time. I also really wish that people with an agenda would stop flitting in here and demanding the right to censor our website. I guess my wishes won't be granted, but it still bears mentioning that this sort of thing annoys me to an inordinate degree. --Hrodulf 02:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm. Maybe banning users who nominate a previously featured article for VFD for no other reason than "It offends me!" Think about it admins, think about it. --Naughtius Maximus Leaf F@H Woof!Za slice MeowMUN 01:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
It's legitimate to nominate articles for deletion if that's a person's judgement. If people don't wish to delete, they can vote to keep. We deleted "Nigger" (unanimously) because it was blatently racist without any redeeming humour. We deleted one article called "Retard", but kept a rewrite of the same name. Each is a judgement call, and it should be. I agree people are sensitive to being offended, but others seem to be equally sensitive to those who are offended. Sir Roger 02:25, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I probably didn't emphasize enough that my suggestions only apply to previously featured articles. I admit banning the user is probably too harsh and I mostly threw it out there to express my frustration rather than suggest an actual policy. But, to reject the nomination might be reasonable, unless it involves an argument we've not heard before. --Naughtius Maximus Leaf F@H Woof!Za slice MeowMUN 03:37, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
No, I read what you wrote about previously featured. Sorry, my comment was not in response to you in particular, but in response to the general talk above. Sir Roger 04:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Horcrux

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Eh, Serq Fet, a good-faith vote makes no enemies. Personally, though, I doubt Horcrux will get rewritten. That seldom happens unless somebody gets really sparked about the article. ----OEJ 02:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I didn't think it was worth a rewrite. For that reason, I deleted it. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Harrypottersyndromeophobia

Keep
Delete

(diary) 01:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Andrei

Keep
Delete
Comments

Aditya Patel

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Deleted. Rather randumb, seemingly not about the racing driver. Most likely vanity. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Uchiha Sasuke

Keep
Delete
  • rubbish. as i said before, kishimoto should go die in a fire with the people who keep writing naruto articles --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • But I did manage this one. It's about a cartoon character that I've never heard of? The Oblong Lobster 18:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Feh. Meh. Beh. Other words of the form Xeh where X is some consonant. --AceMyth 20:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Baleet ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:12, 31 May 2007
  • Delete. ----OEJ 00:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete -- Dexter User:Java7837 (contributions) (talk)

(diary) 01:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Barely coherent. Stupid references to Hitler, emo, paedophilia. Blarch --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete again If I remember correctly, this article had already been killed. Maybe it was another article, though.--Dexter111344 00:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Roman Dog Bird 21:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Rageblood 22:58, 2 June 2007
Comments*Naruto Policy I demand a naruto policy see User:Java7837/narutosucks
    • I support this until someone can write a funny Naruto-related article. Naruto is definetly worth having an article on. Too bad no one is writing any articles worth keeping on the article. --Dexter111344 00:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Plasma

Keep
  • Weak keep Not bad - tag with sciencyness though. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • It's a bit random, but plasma is my favourite state of matter, just ahead of plastic (or is that a phase?). Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep Plasma was discovered as a state by my fellow country-people so I feel patriotically bound to keep this but the Oprah reference must go. Could do with padding out a bit too... maybe a pic? ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:55, 31 May 2007
  • Keep --Dexter111344 23:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Annihilate: short & random & not getting better anytime soon. --DW III CUNOUN 06:56, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Ungood cyclopage. Ref nom. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • how about not --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sir Roger 01:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Chuck Norris

Keep
  • Keep As much as I hate seeing Chuck Norris and his aggressive, take-no-prisoners style invoked for no reason, this is a satisfactory article. Besides, we'd have to huff it round the clock were it deleted. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep - I suspect that if we deleted this, we would get a ridiculous amount of vandalism and HATE HATE HAT posts in the forums. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Although the article is lame, deleting it wouldn't be the wisest thing to do. It just needs some fixin'. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Weak Keep Current article > What IPs will create non-stop if we delete it. Plus, we already have TPDNE, and it would probably end up becoming like that. –—Hv (talk) 31/05 12:37
  • Keep We've been through this in the many debates over the subpages and the page itself - see Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive52#Chuck_Norris. I'm gonna go put that discussion on the talk page somewhere, per previous discussions. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • As above I hate the Chuck Norris meme with a vengenance but it would be created over and over everyday if we huffed it. Could use a bit of a tidy up for sure though. And possibly semi-protection? ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:52, 31 May 2007
  • Strong Keep I have put in far too much work in this article (which mostly consists of constantly deleteing virtually anything that is added by IP users) for it to be just deleted.--Little Jimmy 23:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep - Why are voting on something of this calibre when there dozens of worse offenders out there, written by IP's that were goofing off in studyhall? Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 23:56, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Das Uber Keep - Keep and protect, besides, if we huff, He will come to kill us all. Capercorn 02:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Gimmie a break. As stupid as I find the Chuck Norris meme (as I thought he was hilarious WAAYY before that shit startled -- I realized it as a young man, seeing the classic film Sidekicks), its an essential article for a place like Uncyclopedia. --THINKER 03:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 03:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep just work on fixing it -- Dexter User:Java7837 (contributions) (talk)

(diary) 12:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep Just to keep so many red links from appearing. --Dexter111344 23:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Nomination. Perhaps the only way to save this article is to destroy it first. Nuclear explosion arBaggy's Revenge(Sikon Sux) <:(
  • Delete It is crap though...really crap, and that's why it should be deleted. The Oblong Lobster 12:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • kill it and put it on cvp until someone gives it a good idea --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment. That's what some people thought about RuneScape, which was also shit, and I managed to fix it. --Andorin Kato 03:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • There is a potential replacement page being worked on here: Chuck Norris 2it's in need of a little more expansion but it could be the solution to this problem. --Winstanley1 14:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Baggy's sig is also over 15px. --THINKER 03:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Like I said when first approached on this issue, all I ask for is equality. So, ipso facto, if I have to abide by it, you do to. Don't be mad that Chuck is stickin around!! :) --THINKER 00:40, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I also got in trouble just the other day for my sig. The only link the the signatures page is Uncyclopedia:How To Get Started Editing. Uncyclopedia should make it easier for noobs to find. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Just to be clear, I never actually wanted to delete the Chuck Norris article completely. I just put the idea out there because a lot of people seem to complain about it. However, I've now proven many like the Chuck article after all. Nuclear explosion arBaggy's Revenge(Sikon Sux) <:(
  • Kept, voting closed. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Scarlet strife

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • All the images should go too. Filenames with large numbers = digital camera = vanity. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Leroy & Stitch

Keep
Delete
  • associated with another crappy article listed here, so it should go too --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • It was written by SU182, one of the worst users to ever appear on this site. Since he's gone for good, we should annihilate this piece of shit from existence. --General Insineratehymn 23:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • The article seems extremely stupid and bashes a lot. Destroy it!--Scout JoshHJ's Page and His Talk 23:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. In the words of MO: "This is a bad article, but it's no SU1--oh wait, it is" :D --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 02:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Uggghhhh Quick, kill it before it reproduces! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:34, 31 May 2007
Comments

The Hoobs

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • They're TV characters, but they have very different lives offscreen. How original. Delete --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 03:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 12:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • sigh --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:32, 31 May 2007
  • Delete per Alksub, and because I have to deal with this same level of retardation constantly as a Muppet fan.. --THINKER 03:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Claggan

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • A WP search reveals only a playing field. Huff n' stuff as NN/vanity. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 03:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 12:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • asssucktastic --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:22, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • 'Huff - They didn't seem to listen to the "Use Sparingly" note on the horizontal rule...also I don't think it was Stevie Wonder who got down with his bad self. Sounds more James Brown to me. Anyway that aside its still rubbish. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:24, 31 May 2007
Comments

Norwegian Literature

Keep
Delete
Comments

Russian Reversal Warfare

Keep
  • Keepsome parts of it are pretty funny

and someone put a fukload of work into it and i dont like the pondermatic--ETLCh X4Ch ChTLG GTLCh 06:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

  • KEEP - TORTILLA FINDS THIS PARTITALLY FUNNY. KEEP. Tortilla The Hun 16:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Because it is trite. L 03:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • De-1337 More of an IRC log than an article. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 03:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete My idea of hell. The Oblong Lobster 09:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 12:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Junky crap. –—Hv (talk) 30/05 13:16
  • I think the most appropriate word here is... SHIT --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:19, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Junky junky junk --General Insineratehymn 23:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Destroy. The only way this would have been more unreadable is if someone put a random barrage of seizure inducing images at random points throughout the monstruous chat log. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 23:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Articles should NEVER consist of basically only chat logs. --Scout JoshHJ's Page and His Talk 23:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • WHAT Roman Dog Bird 00:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Overlord Jemima

Keep
Delete
  • Huff Some sticky crud that's too poor to merge with Aunt Jemima. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 02:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Let's see, it has pointless references to Chuck Norris, Tiny Tim, Jesus, Santa Claus, Richard Simmonds, Tyra Banks, Flava Flav, Dick Cheney, Hulk Hogan and Rosie O'Donnell. And that's just scratching the surface. Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 12:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • rubbish --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments


Dot-cow

Keep
Delete
  • Huff Random cruft...I think. –—Hv (talk) 29/05 22:29
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 01:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete But if you haven't read Cowartion. The Oblong Lobster 13:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

M1cR0s0ft

Keep
  • Keep Good concept and fixable; let's try putting it to a Pee Review first (although I don't really have the creativity to direct the fixing). Pentium5dot1 21:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep It is the opposite of Microsoft, it is not that bad. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 22:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Could use some list fixing, but the core is not too bad. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Bunnyland

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Stubby, yet incoherent and strangely boring. ----OEJ 15:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete That someone went to the effort of writing those words is astounding. Truly astounding.. The Oblong Lobster 16:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Voltron

Keep
  • Weak keep Not bad random. Move to illogicopedia? --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep There could be a lot of potential in a Voltron article, but this would need to be completely rewritten because of how crappy it is.--Dexter111344 18:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

is this an anime character? Guiltyyouthclique 11:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/archive73?oldid=5083229"
Personal tools
projects
Stillwaters chronarion.org