Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive71

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


No, it isn't

Keep
Delete
Comments

VFI

Keep
Delete
Comments

Template:Fanjaya

Keep
Delete
  • Say Bye-bye-uh I created it, and now I want it gone. Now that this season of American Idol is over, nobody cares about Sanjaya Malakar anymore, and it appears he doesn't have many fans here, unless his singing career picks up in the coming months. Kip the Dip 20:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Author request. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Only too happy to oblige. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • QVFD your own stuff, for future reference. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 23:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • I hated Sanjaya anyway. --General Insineratehymn 03:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  • who cares? kill --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 03:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Who the fuck is that? Roman Dog Bird 16:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Zergling

Keep
Delete
Comments

Brent Corrigan

Keep
Delete
  • Looking at this article makes me want to vomit up a storm. --General Insineratehymn 06:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Adding a 16th page here should be excused when it is this crap. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Couldn't make it through the first paragraph --Quall 10:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • AGH MY EYES - Some Random Pigeon (Bird Feed) (Bird Droppings). 10:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • L 15:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Bad gay jokes and the Mordor mad-lib. Blarch --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 17:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • This article is shit. It also sucks arse. It's very gay. Did I not mention that it's shit? --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 17:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

US Rangers

Keep
Delete
Comments

Crushing by autofellatio

Keep
  • Keep Passable parody of past painful punishments. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:32, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep A bit of work needed , but a good idea. Rogpyvbc 04:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • 2005cruft. Also, it's absolutely hideous. --General Insineratehymn 01:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • gratuitous sexcruft, good title though --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 02:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Smackdown --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Originally to cross the Wikipedia horrors of Autofellatio, Ashlee Simpson and Crushing By Elephant. That "2005cruft" comment makes me cry and cry and cry just 'cos it's probably true. Plz to userfy if killed kthx. - David Gerard 08:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • The best I can do is abstain... sorry David. It's a bit rambly and confusing - perhaps it needs more sporkiness? --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Indian Programmers

Keep
Delete
  • This article is both ugly and racist. --General Insineratehymn 01:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • your daily dose of shithouse --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 02:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Smackdown --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:55, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Image:Burka copy-thumb.jpg

Keep
  • used on pages, has redeeming value, and your reason for nomming it is rubbish --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 02:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Smackup --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Use value outweighs nudity. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep: It's use on Girls Gone Wilde is appropriate but I agree with Insineratehymn that there should be no gratuitous nudity on Uncyclopedia. Nudity should only be used when the nudity itself is central to the humor. Tacking on nudity to an otherwise good article simply detracts by narrowing the audience to those unopposed to nudity. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep What's so bad about nudity? Why, I'd put up nude photos of myself, except that it would narrow the audience to -- well -- me. On a good day. Rogpyvbc 05:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep The comments above are pretty much what I think. Tode 09:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • There shall be no gratuitous nudity here on Uncyclopedia. --General Insineratehymn 01:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Not keep yet, but this is nothing that we couldn't see over and over at NSFW category. The huge white border is very lame thus. -- herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket [scream!] 02:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Hebe Camargo

Keep
Delete
Comments

Assclown

Keep
Delete
Comments

Pope of East Tennessee

Keep
Delete
Comments

Asshat

Keep
  • Keep I was going to say weak keep anyway (think how much worse stuff is likely to appear under this title...) but then I found a bit of old okay-ness in the history to add in. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Thunder

Keep
Delete
  • o_________o --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 23:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Rogpyvbc 01:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: The article kept having almost moments for me but, ultimately, the randomness won out and I have to vote against it. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is way too random to live. Necropaxx (T) {~}
Comments

Magical DoReMi

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Thank the vandals for bringing this to my attention on short pages. Seems to have no relevance even to the anime its named after. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:08, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Rogpyvbc 01:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • animecruft --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 02:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff Nonsensical fancruft. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

DELETED. Voting Closed. -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 06:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Indiana Institute of Technology

Keep
Delete
Comments

Stunningly ugly formatting, and bad writing too. Wickedpedia has an article on Indiana Tech, if that makes any difference. ----OEJ 22:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Deleted: Random, slandanity, completely lacking in quality, etc. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Template:Templates

Keep
  • Keep I'm as naggy about templates as anyone, but I think these things have their place on a carefully controlled number of pages. In this case, the template has taken on a new irony in these days of template-hating. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep It doesn't invite template abuse - it makes for nice irony on pages with lots of templates already - although where the templates make it funny rather than where someone got carried away. - Some Random Pigeon (Bird Feed) (Bird Droppings). 10:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong strong strong keep. Leagues better than the other one mentioned below. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Why not? It's along the same lines as the no images template (which I can't find) and also makes any page automatically ironic. If used sparingly, could be good.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Re: Ljlego: templates suck. They were considered funny someday in a very distant past, along with Oscar quotes, Mr. T. and Chuck Norris facts. Now the best thing to do is avoid them whenever possible, or adding just one when absolute necessary and abusing the reader's patience a little. -- herr doktor needsAscalpel Rocket [scream!] 23:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
    • I think Ljlego knows. By the way, anonymous delete voter above, I like that other template less than this one. It makes no sense, but in a bad way. So if you want to get rid of one, I'd choose that one. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Deleted: largely for the reasons that HerrDoktor states and, more specifically, templates never add humor to an article, they only ever serve to tie related articles together or annoyingly take up space. This template lived longer than it should have and its time has come to an end. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Sigh. Redirected to the other one, since its absence ironically left a mess of redlinks that I'm really not going to clean up. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Elder Gnome the Great

Keep
Delete
Comments

University of Texas at Dallas

Keep
  • Hesitant Keep. Tag with re-write? I mean, it's no worse than an awful number of articles around here. Rogpyvbc 06:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I know we hate school articles, but if you ignore the prejudice this is actually quite good in places. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Rogpyvbc: that other articles suck is no good reason to keep one that sucks a little less; you should put the other sucky articles up for VFD.
    Strange but untrue: it's not that we hate school articles, it's that we hate random, crappy, retarded articles.
    --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 17:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

James "Sonny" Crockett

Keep
  • It's not great, but it's not crap. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep "This led to a lot of painfully un-cool people walking around looking like hairy easter eggs, because they simply weren't awesome enough to handle the wardrobe." --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 07:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments


Moral

Keep
Delete
Comments

2101

Keep
Delete
Comments

Paul Sahbaz

Keep
Delete
Comments

Zachary Taylor

Keep
  • Keep What the fuck, he's the 12th President for god fucking sakes. It's also fucking funny to, sir--Cookies,yum! 20:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • /me sniper-ifies all of you for trying to delete a president. --CIA agent 00:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • All the U.S. presidents have articles (also some other countries' leaders, too). So shouldn't it be re-written rather than have ol' Zach be the only one left off? Rogpyvbc 07:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
It's uncyclopedia not Wikipedia, what does it matter if there's one president missing. He can be reborn again later, funnier and dirtier. The Oblong Lobster 21:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

SpongeBob

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Someone has redirected it, which is fair enough. Generally best not to do that until an admin has closed the voting though, mysterious someone. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Tribes

Keep
Delete
Comments

From the talk page:

Woop!::Everyone is gonna love this one, huh term?::An adult teen?::I didn´t know that adult teens even exist at all.::Wow!::i cant believe that such a good article was created when edited so much by people who don't have accounts. teh wiki way is working! --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 18:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)::Reply to "Wow!"::Well, I can´t believe it either. Alot newbs adding theirselves to "infamous players" who no one knows and claim they should be... I think this article should be cleaned and locked in order to prevent the sabotage.

It appears not everyone agrees with these comments... ----OEJ 22:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

McGill University

Keep
  • Weak keep A very occasional chuckle. Probably just because it's slightly better than most of the school articles we've deleted. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Jean Paul Sartre

Keep
Delete
Comments

DELETED. Voting Closed. -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 21:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

29 (number)

Keep
  • Keep It's short, but it's kind of something. The Oblong Lobster 19:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep It is something. A stub. Why delete such a cute little stub? -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
Delete
Comments

Boulevard Of Broken Windows

Keep
Delete
  • Break this window --General Insineratehymn 23:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Kill this heresy. How dare the author compare Led Zeppelin to Green Day. Disgusting. Led Zeppelin pwns Green Day. Ugh.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Absolutely. Destroy simply for mentioning Led Zeppelin and Green Day in the same sentence. Oh wait, so did I... Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Rogpyvbc 06:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete--Asahatter (annoy) 07:02, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Fucking kill it Roman Dog Bird 19:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 03:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

DELETED. Voting Closed. -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 21:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Hugi

Keep
Delete
Comments

DELETED. Voting Closed. -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 21:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Fraserburgh

Keep
Delete
  • Blarch. Unfunny random gobshite. Necropaxx (T) {~}
  • 'BUKKAKE'. For the record, waaay too old for ICU (June 2006 "cruft", apparently)--Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Nissan

Keep
  • Keep and rewrite. This one deserves a little bitty chance. --Andorin Kato 04:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • I dont see why tou guys are complaning this is verry funny --Chuck Smith 22:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Bonaqualogy

Keep
Delete
  • Delete - Either needs to be deleted or made more funny and more encyclopedic. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 14:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Short dicdefs, inappropriate for Undictionary. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments


Pig latin/boobs

Keep
Delete
Comments

Image:Mandela.jpg

Keep
Delete
Comments

Gay Boy

Keep
Delete
Comments

HowTo:Make a HowTo article

Keep
Delete
Comments

Kidneys

Keep
Delete
  • Blarch Stubby, centres around a bad pun. We already have Kidney. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 23:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete.----OEJ 23:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and redirect to Kidney. --Andorin Kato 05:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The article "Kidney" is enough. No one really needs two kidneys.Rogpyvbc 06:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Personally I'd prefer 2 kidneys, but will sell these --Asahatter (annoy) 08:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This is a one-joke town. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Gone --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

University of Texas of the Permian Basin

Keep
Delete
Comments

Occupied

Keep
Delete
  • Random stub 2005cruft. Horrible. Huff. –—Hv (talk) 21/05 21:07
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 23:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Short, uninteresting. ----OEJ 23:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Rogpyvbc 06:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Bye --Asahatter (annoy) 08:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete---Retrofuture42 16:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Gone --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

XIII Order

Keep
Delete
  • Blarch Random fancruft. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Rogpyvbc 20:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 23:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. The best edits were the ICU and the DeadEnd templates. ----OEJ 23:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • 'BUKKAKE'--Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Die --Asahatter (annoy) 08:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Gone --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Mecha-Jesus

Keep
Delete
  • Is just too random and is stupid instead of funny. --Chuck Smith 22:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)--
  • Delete Has the usual stupid references, illogical development. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Jesus h8s this article. Smite. --Andorin Kato 22:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 23:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. A good example of the unreadable evils of random memecruft.----OEJ 23:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Peck out its eyes --Asahatter (annoy) 08:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Drops more names than a spill in a nametag factory. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Gone --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Antlantis

Keep
Delete
  • Blarch Low-quality doppleganger of Atlantis. "Borrows" from Futurama's undersea episode. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Rogpyvbc 05:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • yep, this is forkcruft --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 17:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Gone --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

G-loves

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Vanity. Dumb. Unfunny. --Andorin Kato 22:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 23:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as vanity. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I agree: smells like teen vanity. ----OEJ 23:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • 'BUKKAKE'. Also, I thought I already put this on QVFD--Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:11, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Moved to userspace, hopefully not coming back Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Florian

Keep
Delete
  • Blarch L. I. S. T. Space. C. R. U. F. T. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Axe. Looks like a bad attempt at random humor... --Andorin Kato 05:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • ete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • delete Rogpyvbc 05:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 09:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Makes itself out to be terribly well loved when actually it's just vanity based on things some guy has said. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Crackerzilla

Keep
Delete
Comments

Stickman

Keep
Delete
Comments

Poster Children

Keep
Delete
Comments

Dave Batista

Keep
Delete
  • Delete - AAARGH MY EYES! Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Are you kidding me? Pwn! --Andorin Kato 04:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Petty trash-talk about a wrestler, studded with truly awful pictures. Axe --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:33, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • my comment --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 04:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Rogpyvbc 06:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 09:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - truly truly awful. Should probably be shown to all n00bs as an example of what not to write, but I haven't the courage to let it live. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Louis XIV

Keep
Delete
Comments

Gordon Frohman

Keep
  • Rewrite: I think the article's got potential if expanded a bit (i.e. go more into detail about making Frohman the real star of Half-Life 2), but given the current VFD response, I get the feeling it'll fall under nobody cares rules. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 19:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Plan Z Having read the whole webcomic, I have to say that this is pretty accurate. I also love the God tag. BUT, it's short and kinda lacking in substance- rewriting could make this better. --Sir Erwin Rommel 22:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Comment: Gordon Frohman was the lead character of the webcomic Concerned. He was written as a sort of anti-Gordon Freeman, in that he's a friendly bonehead who somehow goes down the same path Freeman does in Half-Life 2. All in all, a lot better than most sprite comics out there (the author actually knew how to end it and not drag it out with a billion Matrix quotes! Wow!), but the tone of voting seems to imply nobody's read this. Ah, well. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 19:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Middle I'm one of those who haven't read this comic, and would vote to delete. However, if you want to rewrite it, I wont vote as such. But I can't vote to keep either, because damn, there isn't anything funny about it currently. --THINKER 00:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Gone. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Little Debbie Snack Cakes

Keep
Delete
Comments

Phobia

Keep
  • Keep I kind of like it. I even added one: "deletophobia" Rogpyvbc 07:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Me too. Couldn't resist. Added scalaphobia, libraphobia and omniphobia. -- di Mario 08:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • It's basically a magnet for cruft, but it has a cat in a fruit helmet. Aww... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. And what's wrong with a poll in an article? --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Blarch List. Cruft. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Fearless: Listcruft supreme. And with a poll in the main article, too. I'd say the list may work as subpages (Phobia/A, Phobia/B, etc), but as it stands, this don't work at all. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 19:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • It's a list, and not a good one at that. There's just too much crap that can be created (by countless idiots who think they're funny and aren't) at the behest of this page. Delete -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC) (signed post-vote)
Comments
  • How many of these are actually real? --Andorin Kato 06:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Hello, i started this page. Yes it is a list, but i think it is ripe for development by someone else, something simple like expanding the specific phobia bits. P.S the original phobias that i put in are all real, i don't know about the others P.S Again, what is wrong with a poll? From Byebyespy 18:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Kept, voting closed. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Deadwood

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. I hate it, but I think it deserves a vote first. -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 13:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 14:23, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Uber-long boring tables, bad pictures, rubbish. Bleuch! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:19, 18 May 2007
  • Delete before I puke. This article sucks.
  • About as dead as the wood after which it is named. --General Insineratehymn 02:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless someone is actually going to fix it. Now. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Contact lens

Keep
Delete
  • Delete - A few revisions, none good. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 14:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Meh. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • GO AWAY! I rest my case.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:15, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Asahatter (annoy) 05:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and nominate for Worst Run-On Bad Grammar of the Month: "It originated as small plastic piece that would be melted onto the surface of the eye to protect the wearer from the bugs, which would commonly try to burrow in through your cornia, and try to get to your brain to lay eggs on the warm frontal lob, which would be commonly be very warm and moist, which the larva would trive in."----OEJ 13:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff - Stubcruft. –—Hv (talk) 20/05 15:39
Comments

ECW

Keep
Delete
Comments

Hardware Store

Keep
Delete
Comments

Shut the frick up

Keep
Delete
  • Oh, GOD. Spare me! --Andorin Kato 06:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • No potential. Delete --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:11, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 07:11, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Frick it -- di Mario 10:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
ICU it hard, and someone should make sure it really improves or the Grim Weeper should slice its database entry off with a breadknife. ----OEJ 13:39, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
I would, but I'm not sure how you ICU something harder than normal...! --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Twee

Keep
Delete
Comments

Eternal

Keep
Delete
  • Blarch Old stub. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 03:06, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Smackdown please --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 03:11, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Asahatter (annoy) 05:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 07:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I guess some things are less Eternal than others... -- di Mario
  • Delete. Some odd history to it, but it never was very good. ----OEJ 13:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • 2005cruft --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 19:29, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit

Keep
  • not this again --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 20:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • But we had this for dinner last night Ma! -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • As I said last time "*Surprisingly, keep. It's a parody of bullshit critics bullshit critiques. Y'know, those blowhards that see a lightswitch in a gallery and drone on about the "...play between shadow and light...", and "The switch itself is in the up position, indicating the joy of lightness...". I'd prefer a different title, but keep none the less. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and suggestion to archive this ASAP - This is wasting space here so soon after the last vote. Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong-Ass Keep It's not going to get deleted. Give it up --Kip the Dip 19:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Alright, I'm sorry, I should've looked in the archives for it, but I think that if something survives deletion then it should have some sort of message on its talk page, that way this doesn't happen again, that way I don't feel like a cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit-bag.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
    We much prefer this method. It give me a chance to --> /me looks at Ljlego with slight grin and one eyebrow raised. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:31, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
No, that would need a slightly smug grin. Obviously. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, yes of course. Well, you've out-logicked me in this one, Sir "Normal Habits of a Person." Sure glad you're more clever than I am. /slightly smug grin. -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Maybe make a list of articles that have survived VFD, that everyone can check before nominating new ones. Rogpyvbc 19:34, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
A new template, maybe? --Andorin Kato 23:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

31338

Keep
  • For. I'm such a nonconformist. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Template:Non-redeemable

Keep
Delete
Comments

The Jiggling Batman is Image:Ualuealualeualueale.gif and is linked on a noomber of ardickles, includulating the seminal Bat Fuck Insane. Enjoy it in its batspastic goodness -- I certainly do. ----OEJ 02:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

It's no batusi. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Slapping

Keep
Delete
Comments

WWFD

Keep
Delete
Comments
Personal tools
projects