This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFD.
Weak keep. There's a lot of good potential there. Everyone who's ever seen a panto as a kid should relate to this. solar penguinSquawk! penguin eggs 12:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Not overly offensive. Needs expanding though. -- HindleyiteConverse 12:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep and rewrite. Hold your pantomime horses. ----OEJ 16:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC) (Did a liddle rerite and added pichoor.) ----OEJ 17:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I don't understand entirely, but if it could be expanded so Americans can understand it, then thats good. Capercorn 22:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
2005cruft --» >UF|TLK|▋» 17:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete. So it is. --officer designateLugiatmMUNNSCMZMWH 17:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
I created this page and would like to have it deleted. I fully realize my mistake; it is purely a vanity page.
Delete. I was unable to get any jokes, and the author probably has given a good reason for this. It's good to recognize a mistake.----OEJ 14:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete - The easiest way to get one of your own articles deleted is to blank it. You won't get banned for it. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 15:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete per author. But self-blanking's not really the best way as some people just revert any blanking they come across. Try blanking and listing on QVFD with a note "author requesting deletion". -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 17:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Fast track delete —Braydie 21:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete. "Her shirt once exploded after the bomb hiding in there detonated. Normally, this would embarace a Girl, but in this case, there was nothing to see." This article is an embaracement. ----OEJ 21:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Huff - This is krap... Capercorn 22:21, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete - I wonder if that word is supposed to be embarrass or embrace... SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Comment - In case anyone cared, I moved the page, and fixed the link. Capercorn 22:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Also Comment. I especially like how you moved it from the wrong name, to another name, which is also wrong. I fix. Or I moved it to an even wronger name. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 01:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep Gentle parody of the kind of English Day Out we used to be subjected to when we were young. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep I haven't heard of it, but that doesn't make it vanity. Anyway, in this case, that doesn't matter.--Abc 12:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Never heard of, no idea if it even really exists, but the article is funny and that's what matters. solar penguinSquawk! penguin eggs 12:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep - This is HUMOUR not nice old American HUMOR. It's supposed to be funny to British people. Capercorn 21:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep, as even an idiot American like me can laugh at it. goshzillacorrespondence 01:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Never heard of the place. --GeneralInsineratehymn 19:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete. "Kahn once lived in the pretty mounts of minnisota where he counted ducklings and giggled in frolick of the sun, He now lives in New Jersey." Bad. Very bad. ----OEJ 21:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
you weak, pathetic article --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Randumb nonsense. Delete. --GeneralInsineratehymn 00:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete - This random piece of cumquat needs to be asploded to the the 890532758932th moon of Uranus 7.0 with a meatloaf bomb... SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep - Only because it's part of the beauracracy series. We should make a template table for that... --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 18:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
The force is strong in this one maybe it should be tagged for a rewrite? --officer designateLugiatmMUNNSCMZMWH 17:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Umm... keep. Just. The name isn't funny though and is holding it back. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep Has potential Randomator 14:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Call me a Star Wars geek, but I found that one funny. Capercorn 22:04, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
2005cruft --» >UF|TLK|▋» 17:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Come on people, this is shithouse. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 14:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
you know, we should institute a rule on here that if an article is kept for rewriting that if it isn't rewritten that it should be huffed --» >UF|TLK|▋» 21:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
If we rewrite-tag, it's an admin decision whether to huff after the 30-ish days anyway. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Nooooo! I love these! Smile every time I pass over them in Short Pages! -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Move to Game: namespace and tag with an appropriate template to request attention. I think there's a "Tax Game" we might be able to connect this with. Pentium5dot1 01:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Weakest keep I can muster The first sentence is strangely hilarious, but the rest is a bit disappointing. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 12:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I'm a musician, and therefore found it funny, however the Biology template should be changed to a Jesus loves this article template. Capercorn 22:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete First of all, "triumvirate" is spelled wrong. Secondly...no. Just...no. --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 06:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete. The article ends up a failure: too random.----OEJ 12:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep Parkerwocky and move it to UnPoetia. ----OEJ 23:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
more 2005cruft --» >UF|TLK|▋» 17:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
See you in hell --officer designateLugiatmMUNNSCMZMWH 17:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete And if it's not too bold of me, I've added in the associated poem, which makes even less than no sense without this page. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Huff - This isn't a poetry/short article website. Capercorn 21:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete Old, unfunny crap. --GeneralInsineratehymn 20:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete "This page was originally sporked from the Homestar Runner Wiki." Hmm... -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep It's not entirely crap. It satirises American politics, in case you didn't notice. Ethereal 09:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep It's part of the keyboard set of articles, which are better when taken as a whole. I've added the relevant template. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 11:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
It just might need a bit of expansion, though. --~
Keep. Yes, it fits very well with the other numpad articles. About the same length, about the same tone. ----OEJ 12:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep. "Keyboard" articles are all short, nothing wrong with the length. And this one is just as funny as the others. Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Eh?
Delete How does this crap survive two years?! --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 06:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete Sorry but no Randomator 14:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete - maybe redirect to 6 (number), but no merge. Correction: See comment below. Pentium5dot1 01:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
None of the numpad articles are very good. To maintain consistency while avoiding redlinks on the keyboard, should we mass-redirect all of them to the appropriate articles on numbers, or should we organize a merge/rewrite effort? Pentium5dot1 01:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Weak delete. It claims claimed to have been a featured article. It wasn't. It's lying. It shouldn't be allowed to get away with that. solar penguinSquawk! penguin eggs 12:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Fucking awful - Roman Dog Bird 03:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
I can't make up my mind. It stinks horribly of school-vanity. On the other hand, I bring to the Committee for VFD's attention Wikipedia has a reasonably developed article on the school; and it's not a highschool. We allow articles on other colleges. ----OEJ 12:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, but it's voted for deletion because it's crap, not vanity. --AAA! (AAAA) 12:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
KEEP, acceptable article getting killed by anime h8ers. Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC) Eh?
Comment I am not an anime hater, it's just that this article turbosucks. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 21:36, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep A much better concept that a lot of the anime articles (i.e. doesn't begin "Love Hina is the story of a prostitute called ??? and her man-bitch ???, who..."). Has some laughs in for us non-initiates too. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 21:40, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
comment - yeah that is true, add some images and fix it up --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
keep - read this thing over, and deserves life. not your average animecruft --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep It's not that bad. Roman Dog Bird 03:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
More animefanotakusuperidiotcruft. All long and no images make Jack an article huffer. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete- No, just no. Randomator 11:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete "Chaucer tried to correct this on his deathbed, but he died." Good for him. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 11:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete.. It's too incoherent. Some sense needs to be made. ----OEJ 12:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep, but probably only because I've been reading Umberto Eco and this is so similar, in a less serious way. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 11:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete It's old and senile, and in no way funny. --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 00:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Splorch. Completely random, and see above. --El Zoof 01:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Huff - It short. It unfunny. Huff. Capercorn 14:52, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete- Rather pointless Randomator 15:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete- Spawned from ∩berday, which is a short article spawned from ∩. At least Nberday should be redirected to ∩berday. --Efitu»Talk|Wikipedia|Email|F@H|Wikia 21:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Huff with extreme prejudice! - WTF? I fail to see the humor in this. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 22:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep. It's not a vanity page as John Profumo (a British Conservative politician and former war-minister) died in his nineties a couple of years ago. He was most (in)famous for his affair with a much-younger mistress in the 1960s who posed naked in a chair for a magazine (hence the doctored photo). His is a well-known name and scandal in the UK and if this is deleted someone will simply create another one at some point. It just needs someone to turn it into a proper entry with actual jokes rather than a single doctored photo.--Zarbag 16:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Huff - I have never heard of the guy. Must be self praise. Huff. It short. Capercorn 23:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete- Either way its a stupid article Randomator 07:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete unless Zarbag cares to do something with it - a little bit of quality funny, and I could change my mind. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 21:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
politicruft --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete "Maade is the son of [insert slandanarous redlink to person I've never heard of here]" -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 21:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Abort like a Fetus - Lame as all hell --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 05:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity, bad spelling and shameless marketing hype. Shove a stake through its heart. --Naughty Budgie 04:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete You appear to be writing a school article. Would you like help getting it deleted? -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 21:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
keep The paragraph at the bottom is funny because it's actually offensive to the writer for holding such attitudes about jew boys. --Hrodulf 22:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Sadly, I understand Yiddish humor, and therefore found that article funny... Keep. Capercorn 15:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I like this article I think it's hilarious Mfitrer 13:08, 5 April 2007
Delete Not funny at all. No potential to be funny. SteveSims 01:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
no thanks --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Not funny, ugly as hell, poorly written, has the worst template ever created and doesn't even - despite its best efforts - manage to be offensive. Killing it would be a kindness, really. RabbiTechno 17:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I've removed my "delete" vote. It seems I misunderstood the humour.Rogpyvbc 20:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Much as I hate myself for saying this, keep. The shockingly dispassionate tone made me laugh in a guilty way. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 21:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
