This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion.
Keep Take out the meme-y bits, clean it up a bit, and this could be a pretty funny article. I'm a Punic geek though, a bit biased. --Whitesidepie4eva!!!I LIKE PIE TOO! 19:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Nominated for deletion because A) it's not funny B) the bits that are "funny" are just copied from the show and C) it's not funny. El Zoof 03:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
go eat shit fuckers --AAA! (AAAA) 04:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
I made this so that Fisher Price wouldn't need that subheading, but now it is decided that it does, making this category a waste of space. Mr. Briggs Inc. 17:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
Comments
Kept, voting closed. -- 12:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Sad - you can see where they're going and it might be really good. Can we just give it a 7-day -rewrite- tag, then huff it if no one's cleaned it up? Smrt-guy 23:51, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Worth improving. Give it the re-write tag. We've kept a lot worse.Rogpyvbc 02:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep. "Uncyclopedia's standard of quality"? No offense to Uncyclopedia, but that comes out rather high-and-mighty. So if it's not feature material, we huff it? --Medvedev(scream) 07:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Has a naive charm, and ditto the whole thing about not huffing everything that's not amazing at first glance. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 17:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I feel that this article does not live up to Uncyclopedia's standard of quality. This article needs either a good kick in the ass or it needs to be sent to the nearest trash receptacle. --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
I hate this article --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Has a spark. Also, the zombie reference at the end is a reference to some horror movie that I can't remember the title of right now. goshzillacorrespondence 00:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep and expand. There's potential here, maybe some time in Pee Review might help it out. (The name's a little random, though...) --AndorinKato 01:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
keep. it's a good idea - jack mort |cunt| talk - 20:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep and expand Good potential for satire.Rogpyvbc 02:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep Treatment by Videophiles could probably do much for this article. Mr. Briggs Inc. 19:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
Not awful, though it needs work. -- 12:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Reread this, now changing vote to Keep and expand. (Or maybe it's just because I wanted voting to be closed.) --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Just crap, Oscar, zombies, it rambles and it's not funny. Smrt-guy 22:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep. It's not that bad if you pretend to be under the influence of drugs. goshzillacorrespondence 04:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Appears to be a vanity page, vanity template was posted a few weeks ago but removed by the author. (I don't know why I can't get this comment inside the purtytable. Can someone fix this?)Rogpyvbc 01:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Huff. Also, fix't. -- 01:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Robert Wilson (politician), a politician in Manitoba, Canada, who was expelled from the provincial legislature after a criminal conviction
Robert Wilson (Missouri), a U.S. Senator (1862-1863) from the Unionist party
Somebody ought to rewrite this piece replacing the non-notable uninteresting Robert Wilson with one of the other ones. ----OEJ 00:44, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Huffed, voting closed. -- 02:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
STRONG DELETE This was uploaded by a douche from ED in a vain attempt to prove that in some way ED was better than Uncyclopedia. He failed. --GeneralInsineratehymn 01:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Pretty sure it's vanity that just slipped through the net at the time. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 02:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
No Google results except for the Uncyc page. Vanityshite=instahuff (unless of course, it's funny, but this isn't) --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
kill kill kill kill kill ki.... - jack mort |cunt| talk - 20:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Pointless and without merit. Oh, yeah - and it's not funny! - Smrt-guy 22:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete and ban, if possible. Smrt-guy 22:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Vanity and "Transformers, Cobra and Mr. T."? Kill.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 23:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Comments
It has an VFD tag and is not listed here. Don't know if this was meant as a joke, but surelly it deserves it. -- herrdoktorneedsAcell[scream!] 00:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
hesitant keep It needs cleaning up a bit, but the basic premisse seems Ok. btw "van de Graaf" is a commun Dutch last name. It means the Earl got to your mommy before your daddy did. --di Mario 17:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
keep. it could be made gooder, definitely. - jack mort |cunt| talk - 20:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
It's not awful, once you get past the redlinks.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 22:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete. NOT FUNNY!! jsemmens 15:59, 31, January 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Ditto article below - this one's slightly longer, but created by the same cabal-of-two that made the article below. If you feel industrious do also cast your eyes over other wonderous contributions by the same authors and their IPs - right now I have an appointment with a mattress. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 02:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete A {{fix}} tag was placed, but it doesn't appear to have improved at all. All I see is a block of randumb text and 2 lists. --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
'Lose it - it could be funny (if only!) and it's had a chance. Smrt-guy 00:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Euthanise it. I was cranky and tried to come up with something funny, way back when... to be honest, I'm stunned it hasn't been huffed already. El Zoof 05:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Huffed, voting closed. -- 15:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
I know about complexity theory, but this one seems pretty stupid to me.... Delete. Gnome …MUNF@H 00:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Random... "humor", no comedic value. Start to sound like an emo chick at some point. The concept may deserve an article, though. --Medvedev(scream) 13:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep. All sorts of comical value. Maybe it's not featured quality, but it's funny for its stubby worth. Could be expanded upon, and I wrote it. I never write things. More to the point, I never finish things either. --KATIE!! 02:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
This is should be an Uncyclopedia must have title. Shame on us for letting it get to this. Keep and rewrite. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 22:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Del taco. What you see here is NOT the well-beloved Hardwick Fundlebuggy Quasi-Feature. That would be Freudian slip, with a lowercase "s" in "slip". This, on the other hand, is a steaming pile of flowers. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 05:19, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Kill and redirect. Duplicate crap. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:12, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
as the above two, we already have a bettrt version - jack mort |cunt| talk - 23:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Yes while they may be another version, its about underwear, its not written in the voice of a "Freudian slip". It needs work, not "youthinasia".
I've tagged this as {{merge}} even though that won't really solve the fundamental problem. Pentium5dot1 04:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Adopted kitty, voting closed. -- 15:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete under the righ circumatnce this could be a hoot. But the circumstances are not right. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 02:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Listcruft=instahuff. I need to write an article mocking these crappy lists. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Who's actually going to sit down and read all of them? —Braydie at 08:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete - No comment. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:01, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
stop just going oooh list! how terrible! some day someone will write an intelligent and harmfully funny list and you bigots will drown it in a sack. huff this though, terrible - jack mort |cunt| talk - 20:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Kitty! Short but sweet - just adding it to avoid argument over ICU removal, as per [[Talk:HowTo:Cut Your Own Head Off With a Chainsaw|talk page]]. -- 22:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep I like it. —Braydie at 22:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep Only if it's expanded. --AAA! (AAAA) 22:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment - Erm, that's the joke, it's supposed to be cut short, he's explaining how to do it and he kills himself... —Braydie at 22:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep It shows the unsafe method first, and in doing so, it killed the narrator, hence why the article stopped so abruptly. That is the reason why I find this article quite funny. --GeneralInsineratehymn 22:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Let it live. Err.... You know what I mean. —Gnome …MUNF@H 22:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Added VFD template; you don't have to thank me just send cash.----OEJ 01:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
ME HATE LISTCRUFT! DELETE DELETE DELETE!!! --GeneralInsineratehymn 01:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Listcruft = instahuff --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
this page is baffling. it could be made into a disambiguation page of sorts. it'd be pointless but it would be good, in that it would send you to such a mad assortment of articles - jack mort |cunt| talk - 14:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Eeep and kxpand. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Very stupid. Nothing more than a long combination of fat jokes.Rogpyvbc 11:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Very stupid, indeed. However, it is also pretty funny, in a weird CIA-agent-writing-the-article kind of way. If anything, I'd delete it for cyber-bullying. --Medvedev(scream) 13:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Adopted kitty, voting closed. -- 16:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Smash with a comically large caveman stick The image caption "Pancake after huffing a kitten" really told me how sucky this was. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 05:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Huffed, voting closed. -- 08:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Yes it does. (sometimes, when I feel like it). goshzillacorrespondence 01:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep, eh? Oh man. I don't even think we have yaks in Canada. This article just made my Top 10. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 02:02, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep Its's neat, and whoever made the headings knew that the contents box was the first thing to look at.--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 02:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Reread this, and is pretty damn funny. Keep and expand. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:34, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS DOING HERE (again). —Hinoatalk.kun 02:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
expand Funny if it was expanded.--Shas 02:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Upon reading this a second time, keep and expand. --GeneralInsineratehymn 02:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep and Expand Just the title alone makes this a candidate for the Uncyclopedia Canadian Article Title Hall of Fame. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 03:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep surprised by the number of keep votes, but hey, when you're right you're right, i guess. --»His Majesty King George VI(the boxes) 07:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Huff Constantly being crass does not equal funny. --GeneralInsineratehymn 01:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
*barfs* --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete. (Protest vote) Yeah, it's funny...in that way the makes you say, "Oh isn't Johnny a special boy. Now wipe the drool off his chin and send him off to his Special School." ----OEJ 02:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Do we really want to expand this article?
I mean, we can't expand Fisher Price, but it's 4 words of writing that was good enough to feature.--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 02:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Adopted kitty, voting closed. -- 15:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Yes, the opposite of good. --Anyone 21:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Cliched. You could substitute 'Burgess Hill' for any old place throughout the article. And it would still suck. -- HindleyiteConverse 21:18, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
i've been through the station at burgess hill, it was a very dull station, but still more interesting than this article - jack mort |cunt| talk -
euthanise. Article states to be in unbearable pain with no hopes of embetterment. Dr admin, end misery please-- di Mario 22:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
I wrote this a while ago but don't know how to expand it. That whatever-band-dealie deserves better. Smash --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 20:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
It's not great, but it's not really the normal crap that resides in these halls. (which is the utterly stupid can't believe it made it past NRV stuff). But if you think it should go then so be it. --Anyone 21:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Please don't delete the image at least. Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC) Eh?
w00t! I can use the same comment I used last time. Ahem..."I'm stuck in the middle; I don't care about Smashmouth enough to care about whether a page about them stays or goes. I'm actually surprised that someone cared enough about them to both make a page and retouch a photo. I'm even more surprised that someone cared enough about Smashmouth to gather them together and take a picture of them, and I'm stupidly surpised that Smashmouth cared enough about Smashmouth to gather themselves together for a photo. But I digress, my vote Meh". It's really that blah. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 00:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Huffed, voting closed. -- 15:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Something's rotten in the state of Denmark. This is the second time an unsigned user has put a VFD on my article. On the off-chance that there really is something bad about it go ahead and vote but I'll be watching you all from now on. Allllways watching... Nullius in Verba 04:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
No en:wp article makes me say, vanityshite = instahuff. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Created Sept 14, 2006. The creator left a note that he would come back. He didn't, this page and the image on it are his only contributions. (Yes, this text was copied&pasted, but it's true for this article, too....) —Gnome …MUNF@H 12:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Huffed, voting closed. -- 22:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
keep! Christ mother fucking of Ghod! It's about booze!! You touch one drop of their single malties an you are sold ferever! There literally ain't none better. It is a well-known fact, British Lords actually kill for a snorter of Aver%C3%B8y. Hoscar the Wield did, documented. An so did Ladia Die! -- di Mario 23:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Created Dec 14, 2006. The creator left a note that he would come back. He didn't, this page and the image on it are his only contributions. —Gnome …MUNF@H 23:49, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
delete. Harmfully bad - jack mort |cunt| talk - 21:06, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
HTBFANJS --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:59, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete. —Gnome …MUNF@H 12:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete. No useful content. ----OEJ 17:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Sucksucksucks. Get rid of it please. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Well, he is following Uncyclopedia's Prime Directive: satirize real life blunders and injustices. Or something. Whatever it was, I think the article deserves a good slap from the "under construction" template. --Medvedev(scream) 21:35, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
I would say that this is a topic which should be covered on Uncyclopedia, but it needs more than a total rewrite, it needs an intellectual enema. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 21:38, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Huffed, voting closed. -- 22:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
After I did the research, went to the original site and figured it out, I think the Uncyclopedia article is in many ways superior to original. Needs clean up though. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 21:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Its a parody! duh...go to YTMND's web page (but oh god I don't recommend it...), and it will become obvious. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 22:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep. I tried doing the audio record myself, but it came out bad, so I scrapped it (see talk page of ytmnd)--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 03:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
(UTC)
Keep. That is Wendy driving the get-away car. She was only twelves then. I was so proud! -- di Mario 23:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete - This is just scary. --AAA! (AAAA) 08:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Having to think "what the fuck?!" is a bad sign.... It seems this once used to be longer. Too long to read in my luchbreak, that is. I'll come back later. —Gnome …MUNF@H 12:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
The old version looks like random crap to me. Delete. —Gnome …MUNF@H 14:14, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
