This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Delete: This is either a brilliant work of prose or... something? Vanity? Nonsense? It's had the old-style Grue warning on it since time immemorial (November 2005), so my guess is it's huffable regardless. --CaptainSpamMUNPUTPBAA 00:39, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Wow, that sucks. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:53, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete: If this is an attempt at satire, it fails miserably. It's stupid, not funny at all, and just comes across as bigoted.Rogpyvbc 07:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
learn how to read it sucketh less than the My Chemical Romance which hast been written by a complete retard, who is probably only slightly less retarded than I. -Man in the Ceiling
Delete
Take it out behind the shed: Very random and completely unfunny. I started an attempt to do what I felt would improve it with making small edits, and the user who wrote it in its current form wont let the article budge. -AhhDiddums 04:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete: How do you fix a list article? Why, you just combine all the list items into one unbroken paragraph, of course! Plus, it reeks of middle school angst and the history shows ICU tags being yoinked at random. --CaptainSpamMUNPUTPBAA 21:26, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete:It will be way to hard to try to save. I do not think many editors will edit because it will take a lot of work and even if they put a lot of work into it still will probably be deleted.Sir james paul 22:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Not listcruft, but still sucks. Deletify. --UNKNOWNFILE 00:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Icky. Slay. I've seen this before and I wonder why I didn't VFD it... at least back then there was an actual list rather than a giant paragraph. --Andorin Kato 04:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Is this cack? Why, yes, it is.--Nydas 10:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Huff. Someone flagged this with the FFW template on New Year's Eve, but taking a look at the history it seems the NRV tag was removed. So, what do you say? --UNKNOWNFILE 06:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Tested on several known liberal and known conservative friends. Bipartisan consensus: Not funny. --»His Majesty King George VI(the boxes) 10:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Die in a fire. I'm running out of comments to make. --UNKNOWNFILE 17:18, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Third parties also agree that this is not funny. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 21:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Throw it in the fire with the rest of the crap. --GeneralInsineratehymn 01:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Long, but still few hidden gems. Delete--Winston 15:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete Shit, shit, shit, shit, shit, shit, shit. The article is SHIT plain and simple. No offense. Sir james paul 23:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep It can be fixed to be better. --Sir james paul 01:58, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Give me two sodas, a dildo, some vaseline, and a lot of tissues, and I can probably have this one looking presentable to the British House of Lords within a week. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 21:46, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete. I don't usually VFD long articles that include pictures, but I think this one is very bad. The phrase "park whore" does not even appear in Urban Dictionary's listings of memes and trendy freakspeak.----OEJ 18:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
I think it's a local saying. Said by locals.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 18:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete----OEJ 15:52, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Delete.
Ahh, I get it now. Not any, I never get that. (I spent no time at all thinking that up, and it's still funnier than the page).--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 18:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Deeply confused, but shallow.----OEJ 15:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
The intro is an interesting (if poorly worded) start to a satire on Creationism vs Neodarwinism (the Hitler/Darwin argument comes up on occasion in that realm)...then it goes all listy. Too much work to fix; too little chance of funny even if I do.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 18:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - "da SPEECH" —Braydie at 14:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
I don't know how to vote on this article. The idea of the bushes in a band is good but the article in the current state, not so good. I believe that in most cases if the article can be salvaged then we should. This article would need to have a major amount of edits to make it good. It would take a lot of energy and time and I am not sure editors would put in the right amount of energy needed to put it up to standards. This is making me think deletion would be best. At the same time it can be fixed, this makes me want to keep it. I think that I will not vote to keep or delete it. I am fine with it either way. --Sir james paul 02:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Huff. If it's what I think it is, we've got a better article already. If it isn't what I think it is, we've got a million better articles already, most of them on QVFD. -- 20:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Sucks. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - It's not funny, and the portions are terrible. --Alksub 08:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep as it is very funny (in my eyes atleast). --UNKNOWNFILE 22:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep Yeah it is pretty funny, but disgruntled bigots are writing those comments, it's not satire, so I can see how it could cause real offense. --Tt22 22:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
As long as morons are concentrating their bile on the talkpage, they aren't messing with the pagepage (or if they are, they're messing with the pagepage less, due to the distraction of very slowly filling up the talkpage with bile). Semiprotecting the pagepage just pushed them to the talkpage; semiprotecting the talkpage will just push them to mess with other Isrealated pages. Try adding an archive to the talkpage called "holocaust deniers" or something. Also, I've discovered that I enjoy using the term pagepage.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 23:07, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep Its a tawk page, and its amusing (eyes famines comment with a smile)--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 06:17, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Weak keepVery, very weak keep. --Sir james paul 02:22, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Keepits a funny article. that zionist occupation offends me every day by killing innocent children which is not funny —The preceding unsigned comment was added byPenuple (talk • contribs)
Delete
I know this is a bit unorthodox, but this is becoming an ugly political racial debate, and I just had about enough. This is the one place I don't need this. So please, delete and semi-protect. What say ye? Brigadier Sir MordilloGUNUotYWotMFPUotMAotMMI3AnotMVFH+S 12:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - I don't know what Policy would say on deleting talk pages if he were here. But this adds nothing to dialogue to counteract its vulgarity. --Alksub 08:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete Goddamned Jews. On a serious note, while the bigotry is kinda funny, Uncyc isn't the place for racism. Or is it? BaCaRuDa 15:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Found this through Random Page. Not only does it suck, but it removed the ICU tag, and hasn't been edited by many people, which gives me a reason to list it here. Huff, but save me some of it. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Agree with Prolix. Facts at a glance had me laughing out loud! Rest could use work, of course. --»His Majesty King George VI(the boxes) 10:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep. There is some decent material here. That horrible slander-sheet Wikipedia has a satirical article on Sacred Heart University claiming it's the "second largest Catholic university in New England" so the subject is slightly notable.----OEJ 15:32, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Is vanity, though it passes UN:CM, but is overall not funny. SMASH! --UNKNOWNFILE 04:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Crush. Unfunny - and how is there not a single Scrubs reference in this? - Lemon. 05:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
not completely without humour but certainly vanity - jack mort |cunt| talk - 17:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. At least the author knows his grammar- but the article itself makes no sense. --Andorin Kato 23:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain <sulk> you VFD'd the article on me home town.</sulk> Justly so, twerent funny. But still...What's next ey? VFD the article on Dutch ? -- di Mario 13:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Found guilty on one count of suckiness, and two for ICU/NRV removal. Also fails CM test on Google. --UNKNOWNFILE 04:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC) (PS: hooray for Special:Randompage.)
Rid us of this junk. --fish 06:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete Not funny (or am I still sulking ?) -- di Mario 13:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Um, yeh. It may in fact be a parody of an existing disease that sounds like "cornripple". Or not. Either way, it's not working for me. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 23:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)