Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive45

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Unemployed

Keep
Delete
  • Seems to be extreme vanity. Even got a phone number in the end (obviosuly might be bogus, but I wouldn't know....) -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 12:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I must agree -- Soul101 Icons-flag-gb~MAREPENT! 12:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Nah, nowt could save this junk, not even Ricky Gervais. Are you 'avin a laugh? -- Hindleyite 12:55, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity to the max. Huff it. --Hhamdy283 13:27, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Vanity deserving of death. --Onion 20:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Or Pete Rose. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:38, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Random Crap

Keep
Delete
Comments

Aiai

Keep
Delete
  • wtf? --Anyone 17:20, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Sucks, and I say this having read "Ouroboros". --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 20:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Just...ugh. --Hhamdy283 23:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 09:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Aye aye -- Hindleyite 12:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete This artice is pretty awful. Just a synopsis of the Super Monkey Ball games with Oprah --Randy Jackson 16:12, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)17:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Zesticles

Keep
Delete
  • Was NRV & since expanded; it hurts just to look at it. --DW III CUNOUN 13:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • this must be huffed for the good of mankind! - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 14:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • No, kill it now -- Hindleyite 17:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • All-in-all, it sucks, especially after the chuck norris mention. But cmon...zesty + testicles = zesticles! That's awesome. --Anyone 17:16, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Crap. --Hhamdy283 23:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 09:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

'Tis a goner. --DW III CUNOUN 09:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Conceptart.org

Keep
  • indecipherable nonsense. i look to look at the article itself as a piece of concept art, makes it seem more intelligent than it is. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 14:17, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Lots of Vanity... was NRVed before, and since has gone down the tubes due to vandalism, and the addition of much crap. -- Soul101 Icons-flag-gb~MAREPENT! 10:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • load of toss. toss --no, yuo Tanks-12px chat 12:49, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 09:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Good find, but isn't grounds for VFD so much as it's grounds for just deletion. Half of it feels like slandanity, the other half feels like shameless site promotion. We're not running an intergalactic kegger. --Anyone 12:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Part of me agree's. another part of me says the idea of Concept Art and painting the White House in the blood of American babies is actually redeemable, so putting it here might inspire the more humourously inclined. Also, it's a bit long for QVFD, and it might just require a revert/cleanup/pissup -- Soul101 Icons-flag-gb~MAREPENT! 13:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

WRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Keep
Delete
  • Pointless drivel with no explicit D.B. ref... --DW III CUNOUN 09:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Unfunny in the extreme -- Soul101 Icons-flag-gb~MAREPENT! 10:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Blah. --Anyone 12:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Gas it. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 14:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm all for WRYYYYYY, but this just sucks. Smashy! User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 20:25, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 09:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Silas Marner

Keep
  • Keep. - First paragraph's bad, second is okay, make it about george eliot instead of the book. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 14:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments


Malawi

Keep
Delete
  • Malawi deserves better. --Anyone 19:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill with a nuke. --Onion 02:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 04:25, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • kill. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 14:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Old Time Moonshine Get Your Freak On Super Special Hour

Keep
  • keep surely, this has lots of potential. a japanese style wild west themed gameshow? that's genius. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 14:00, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I didn't find it overly repulsive. -- Hindleyite 17:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Kind of a funny title, but no. --Anyone 19:04, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. See my comments in Americanism. --Hhamdy283 22:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • This isn't even worthy of MXC. --Onion 02:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
You say that like it's a bad thing. —The Right Honourable Major Sir Hinoa KUN UmP UotM Bur MDA NS CM (talk) 20:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. If only the article was as creative as the title (or, "The Story of 99% of Uncyclopedia").--Winston 04:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Americanism

Keep
Delete
  • I'm as much for buttsex with George Clooney as the next person, but it must be done sparingly. --Anyone 18:56, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Factual. Could be much better and more subtle. -- Hindleyite 20:03, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. For this one, I took off my glasses and blurred my eyes, and I identified it as crap. I then focused my eyes and put on my glasses, and I confirmed my aformentioned opinion. --Hhamdy283 22:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • The subject matter has potential, but was poorly executed. --Onion 02:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Crass.--Winston 04:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I love shitting on americans from a great height as much as the next man, but this is hardly a witty lampoon or social satire. Kill kill kill. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 13:56, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Banished from the face of the earth -- Hindleyite 17:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Inverse Reality Theory

Keep
Delete
  • Besides not being based on anything remotely real, It's random crap. --Anyone 18:53, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • The article does well in contradicting itself. I say kill it. --Onion 02:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It starts of the exact opposite of truth <yawn>, then moves rapidly into a state of randomity <yawn>. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 09:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • This could be very worthwhile if it was expanded, and made more coherant. if it is then keep it, if not kill. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 13:48, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I'll tell you what a wise-person once told me (I think it was Modus) "Unless you're the one to do it, it won't happen." Or something like that. I don't know, it was a long time ago. --Anyone 14:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
That sounds like something I'd say. Or, to be more accurate, it sounds like something I read someplace else, and passed on. Like the clap.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
You read the clap? Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 20/10 17:37

Sean Bean

Keep
  • Sure it's fanboyish, but I dunno, It's not half-bad. And usually only the full-bad stuff gets deleted. --Anyone 18:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep there is no (good) reason for this to be deleted. besides, Sean Bean is a great man. --Redribbbon 01:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep if this Uncylo-fied and given more substance. --Hhamdy283 22:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • keep. - it's not even that bad, and the fanboyishness(sp!) seems to be at least partly parody. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 13:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • This article is a mixture of drivel with fanboyish adoration. Kill with a single arrow to the head. --Onion 15:50, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It's like Chuck Norris jokes, but without jokes. --EvilZak 02:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete this wankfest.--Winston 09:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Lightsabre

Keep
  • Saveable. Not the normal mindless crap that usually belongs here. --Anyone 18:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • The bit about lightsaber duels is priceless. I'm saving it. --Medvedev (scream) 16:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I fixed this article. Oddly enough, not in my normal fashion for vfd'd articles. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 20/10 17:34

Duh

Keep
Delete
  • “Duh!”
    ~ Oscar Wilde on duh
    - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 22:49, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
  • “Huh?”
    ~ Oscar Wilde on duh
    --Theo 12:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • The...”
    ~ Oscar Wilde on duh
    -- Soul101 Icons-flag-gb~MAREPENT! 12:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • “JUST FUCKING DELETE THE PAGE ALREADY!”
    ~ Hinoa4 on Duh
    H.13:10 UTC, 10.18.2006
  • --Anyone 18:38, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per Hinoa -- Hindleyite 19:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Deleted per Hindleyite, voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)20:00, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

"Stephen the protoMartyr"

Keep
  • Is there some detail I'm missing. This is the recently featured pic, right?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:03, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I like it, it's funny. Beside the fact that it's a featured picture, it's simply hilarious. Anybody who doesn't like it is probably a Christian suicide bomber.--Medvedev (scream) 11:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Wow, someone really wants a perma-ban. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 05:58, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

This doesn't belong in VFD. --Anyone 18:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


π(5), question. WHAT THE FUCK WERE YOU THINKING?!? Kept; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)18:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Waco

Keep
  • It is a decent article. Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • keep. some effort's been put into it, it just needs more pictures and funny, and to be more satirical, at the moment it's too factual. - - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 13:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It has a nice conspiracy premise, but needs more humour.--Winston 09:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Laffy Taffy

Keep
  • This is funny as hell, at first, it looked like a QVFD article until I saw it was about the writer of the Laffy Taffy jokes! The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mr. Briggs Inc. (talk • contribs)
  • Keep. I dunno, this has a wiff of promise. NRV it. --Hhamdy283 22:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • keep. - NRV it i reckon, then kill it if no one fixes it up. there is some small promise. - - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 13:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Part of the problem was that the article has been so vandalised. I've reverted to a better version.--Winston 09:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete

AAAA!--Theo 12:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

  • No. It doesn't take any effort to plagiarize a bunch of laffy taffy jokes from the internet. But I do like that addition of an "aristocrats" joke thrown in there towards the end. I suppose the author was luring you into a false sense of security with the kids jokes and then using the aristocrats one for shock value. It does not warrant the keeping of this article however. --Anyone 07:27, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
  • Destroy. It's aesthetically sickening, for one. I can't stand to look at it. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:53, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Rosanne doorn

Keep
Delete
Comments

Not just should be QVFD'd, but needs to be QVFD'd, and fast. It looks like obvious cyberbullying, and there's really no way to tell if it isnt. --Anyone 14:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

LaToya Jackson/Janet Jackson

Keep
  • Keep. I chuckled. It's pretty crass, though. (addition: Oh, and desperately needs pictures.)----OEJ 09:46, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
  • Keep. It needs love, a picture, and formatting, but it's not terrible writing.--Winston 10:01, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments


Yellow fever

Keep
  • Keep. I got the joke, I had to read it twice though wink wink nudge nudge--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 05:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Fantastic! Great article, better than most being voted on in for features. Maybe the porn has offended sensitive little Jocke Pirat... Aaadddaaammm 08:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • srsly? This is actually on VFD? No, I don't believe it. --Anyone 14:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • If anything, keep it for the pics. --Onion 18:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • 私は笑いました。 I laughed. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 01:03, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • This is my third article to make it to this page, and I'll tell you, I'm thrilled! Unfortunately, the noble forces that tried to crush these two failed. The nominator has given good reasons for deleting it, but what does everyone else think?!? --So So 02:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

JFK's Presidency Hoax

Keep
Delete
  • Stupid. --Anyone 20:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • --~ Tophatsig 01:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Fuck all --Micoolio101 05:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Too insubstantial. "Straw muppet" is a good malapropism but never used to effect.----OEJ 09:39, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
  • Impeach. --Onion 18:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Heh, yeah. Straw muppet. Too short. -- Hindleyite 18:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Metal Sonic

Keep
Delete
  • Dumb shite. --Anyone 20:52, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • --~ Tophatsig 01:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. More a "pantsy" stuff in the article than "ultra-pwning-ness".----OEJ 09:53, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
  • Stupid. --Onion 18:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Sega Mega Drive cruft. -- Hindleyite 19:00, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Carl Barks

Keep
Delete
  • No explanation needed. --Anyone 20:40, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • --~ Tophatsig 01:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Insubstantial, uninteresting.----OEJ 16:53, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. It's too stupid. --Onion 18:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Chuck on bommie for next month --- Hindleyite 20:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Pope Snookielumps XXV

Keep
Delete
  • Yes, it IS as stupid as its title suggests. --Anyone 20:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree. --Micoolio101 05:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Short, nonsensical in a bad way.----OEJ 09:54, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
  • If it was any longer, I'd lose IQ points. --Onion 18:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Just...ugh. --Hhamdy283 22:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keel -- Hindleyite 19:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Grease Farmer

Keep
Delete
  • Stupid, random crap that hasn't been touched since april (barring Hindleyite's +cat/stub). --Anyone 20:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Looking back, I think it might be vanity, and not very good vanity at that. -- Hindleyite 20:33, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill it --Micoolio101 05:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.----OEJ 17:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Slay. --Onion 18:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

So Solid Crew

Keep
Delete
  • Most of it is just taken from wikipedia. It may be half-sporked, but I assure you it's all crap. --Anyone 20:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I didn't really find it that funny. And I'm now beginning to dislike Wikipedia sporks. -- Hindleyite 20:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It's factual, but please don't take you anger out on the sporks, some of which are really good. Mr. Briggs Inc. 14:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Comments

LRGS

Keep
  • OK, so it's a bit of a vanity page, but it has funny parts even for those not from the school, I know, cos I've spread it around, and it's not really bullying. It's a mockery of a very strict, tradition-ruled school. I should know. Plus, lots of people have spent huge amounts of time deveoping this.--T-Roooy 12:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't even know why anyone would want to delete this page, its funny for people going to the school and even for people who don't go it still has its funny sections. Its not in any way cyber bullying.--Trickster 12:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • We should maybe change the names, but keep the article, it is obvious to me that someone worked hard on this article, that includes, but is not limited to adding jokes, shopping pictures, and reverting vandalism. Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:16, 17 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
  • The fact this is not pure vanity doesn't stop it from increasing the Uncync reputation as a "cyber bullying" ground. I say delete. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 11:07, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
    • what he said. ComaVN 13:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I have to agree. --Anyone 18:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agree with OEJ. Unless someone plans on fixing it, kill it. --Onion 18:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. There are many personal attacks here, which is grounds enough for deletion. Plus it sucks, and only people at the school would find it funny (maybe). --Hhamdy283 19:52, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Trash, and apparently, the headmaster[1] has objected to it as cyber-bullying.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN  Eh?  Oh!  UnTunes! CannabagreenI Card-hearts-up my cat! 20:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • MOVE to user namespace until the article conforms to non-vanity standards: no naming teachers and students (we have no way of knowing if Chris Mead or Mr. Yelland are real and the naming of names verges on cyberstalking). And general-audience jokes should outnumber in-jokes.----OEJ 18:34, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


Mace Windu

Keep
Delete
Comments

Alex D. Mayor

Keep
Delete
Comments

Real men

Keep
  • Keep, but needs more satire and less humor Mr. Briggs Inc. 17:06, 14 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
Comments
  • I would really like to mess with this -- "Real men realize that it's not about winning or losing, it's about how many spangles there are on your costume...Real men are confident enough to let women open the door for them, and to take an old lady's seat on busses...Not only are real men not afraid of crying in public, they are not afraid to wear red vinyl pumps with a blue silk frock...Real men don't eat quiche, they smear it all over their bodies and ask each other to lick it off..." etc. Yea? Nay?----OEJ 18:16, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Lordi

Keep
Delete
Comments

Eternity

Keep
  • Needs expansion, but isn't crap, compared to a significant number of articles.--Quira 13:57, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Why? Mr. Briggs Inc. 15:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Although obviously a tad biassed due to having written it myself, I feel that this article at least is better than some of the other repetitive pulp out there. Granted, its main body is loosely founded on a repetition joke, but that is only part of it and in my view kind of unavoidable when talking about eternity. I don't even feel it has been stressed that much, it is just one of the aspects. It is a big concept and maybe it was a bit ambitious of me to take it on, but I feel it is definitely a concept that needs to be represented and it does have quite some volume now. Also, it has in the mean time been polished uop a bit by others, so maybe it is more acceptable now? User:Dutchy 12:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 13:53, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • No. Repetition angers the Uncyclopedia monster. -- Hindleyite 16:08, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Okay, bye AAAAA!, All work and no play, infinity, and the song that never ends. Mr. Briggs Inc. 17:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
      • Without entering into extensive conversation, those were good for their time. They are in the past and can only be imitated. Besides, Uncyc has moved on from banal repetition jokes. -- Hindleyite 18:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Eternity is how long we have to wait for articles like this to become funny. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 16:10, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Great Justice. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 17:46, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For even and ever. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 15:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I think it could be good if it went in a different direction that wasn't already played about by AAAAA!, etc. --Anyone 18:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. See on repetition joke, you've seen 'em all.----OEJ 18:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Knights of the Banana Republic

Keep
Delete
  • Amusing title, then goes the way of the Star Forge.--Procopius 21:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • This would make for a great topic, but the article is Blah. --Onion 01:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Unlike Pastor of Muppets, this page's badness overvwhelms the cool pagename.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:52, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • "Goes the way of the Star Forge", heh. Witty. Blast it. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 10:18, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Needs more funny stuff. -- Hindleyite 16:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Like Modus said, cool title doesn't deserve the crap under it. --Anyone 18:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I admit, however, that I have never before seen "harmounsly" used in a sentence.----OEJ 18:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Gmail

Keep
Delete
  • Unfunny, incoherent slander involving Oprah and bizarre dates. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 17:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't you know? Oprah + anything = ROFLCOPTER. --Anyone 19:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I couldn't make it past the first paragraph. --Onion 01:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • No more cold war references please. -- Hindleyite 16:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Please sir, may I have no more? --Hhamdy283 03:22, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Psychiatry

Keep
  • It's odd, but it's not crap. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I agree with Sir Modus. But the article needs polishing and expansion.----OEJ 18:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • I caynt spell. And also, I'd just like to thank 69.86.50.134 for taking the time to change "mom" to "mama." It made all the difference, kind sir. --Anyone 16:33, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Anyone else getting sick of these Tom Cruise articles? --Onion 01:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Lame. I don't like Scientology either, but this is just a rambling, incoherent attack on Tom Cruise and Scientology. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. End it. --Hhamdy283 19:56, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • I don't hate it enough to kill it or like it enough to keep it, but that's a really cool picture - David Gerard 20:58, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I like the piccie -- if anyone knows the source of the power-rangers-style dude we could slap a Tom Cruise face on another one and add it to the article. I did some minor revisions.----OEJ 18:56, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


Nirav

Keep
Delete
  • bad, bad, bad, bad.--The One and Only Czar Yah 01:46, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • 23:18, 13 October 2006 Famine huffed "Nirav" (Smells like vanity)
  • 16:02, 13 October 2006 Famine huffed "Nirav" (Smells like vanity)
  • 13:10, 12 October 2006 Mhaille huffed "Nirav" (vanityshite)
Took three tries, but it's gone now. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:04, 14 October 2006 (UTC)


"Scientists Run The Government" Conspiracy Theory

Keep
Delete
  • Hmm. Is saying that "Oscar Wilde and Chuck Norris quotes are getting old"...getting old? --Anyone 16:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I think so. --Onion 01:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Cliché caca. <3 / KappaDelta 06:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Sigh. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 06:56, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Could have been funnier If they tried harder. Try having scientists forcing Evolution in schools and doing away with Religion in place of Secularism because Science competes with Religion. Delete this crap, it could have been funnier. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 16:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Ozone

Keep
Delete
  • Stoopid. Our environment deserves better! --Anyone 16:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Some of this old stuff sucks by today's high Uncyclopedia standards. -- Hindleyite 16:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I think it sucks by any standards. --Onion 01:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I think random humor always sucked, it just took seeing so much of it to realise how much it sucked - David Gerard 21:00, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Frank

Keep
Delete
  • There's a such thing as Frankism and nobody in my family leads it? HERESY! (Not to mention reeking of vanity and suck. And there are four people in my family named "Frank," so...) Smashy! Maj Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) (02:45, 13 October 2006 (UTC))
  • Steve. I mean delete. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:07, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Randumb vanity-- Hindleyite 16:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • teh ghey. Franks of the world deserve better! --Anyone 16:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill for all above reasons. --Onion 01:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Who knew that Benson had a brother named Frank?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:36, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • 06:23, 14 October 2006 Guest huffed "Frank" (VFD)

The fall of Rome

Keep
Delete
  • Delete it. It sucks. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 16:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Stoopid. Really big arbitrary numbers should be grounds for QVFD no matter what. --Anyone 20:37, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Lamesauce. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Gah -- Hindleyite 16:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. z0mg it's so g00d l4wlz. NOT! --Hhamdy283 00:57, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Let's learn about The Fall of this Crappy Article. --Onion 01:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • 06:22, 14 October 2006 Guest huffed "The fall of Rome" (VFD)

Other ways humans are just icky

Keep
Delete
  • This is an incoherent piece of crap. Terminate. --Onion 16:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Wow, that page is all over the place. Focus, people. Focus!--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:20, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete this thing please. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 16:23, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Rubbish -- Hindleyite 18:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • No don't not delete it. --Anyone 20:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Monster

Keep
Delete
  • Nuke. The article consists of unfunny sexual references followed by a huge list. --Onion 15:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Monsters and Anal Rape in holy matrimony. --Anyone 20:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill it. Kthnxbai. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 06:57, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Dysfunctional Families

Keep
  • Good start, has potential. Needs work, not kill on sight. - David Gerard 20:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Kill. This is the epitome of bad satire. --Onion 14:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Politico-cultural ax grinding in a totally unfunny way. --WheelMan 18:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • meh. Almost a year old = this trash isn't going to get any better. I'd rather someone start over with a fresh idea than be tainted by this crap. --Anyone 20:32, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

LithiYum!

Keep

Keep, I see the start of an Uncyc in-joke! Okay, so maybe not, but this is a good start. It needs a section about the mascot, Captain Drycon though. (10 points to anyone who gets the reference) Mr. Briggs Inc. 10:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?

Delete

Crap, thrown together by IPs.--Theo 03:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Multiple heads arn't always better than one, especially when those heads are attached to idiots. --Anyone 13:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments
  • "LithiYum is a special brand of Japanese Cereal." I almost voted keep based on that. Then I read the rest of the article. Then I deleted it. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 17:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Malaclypse the Younger

Keep
Delete
  • wtf? Dumbness masquerading as humour. --Anyone 02:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • agreed.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It's coherent Discordian in-jokes. Pity it's completely unoriginal - David Gerard 20:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • No. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 20:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Not an adequate article for the topic. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't get it. -- Hindleyite 16:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy with care. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 17:39, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Jewish-Palestinian Pact

Keep
  • Sure, para 1 is awful. The rest isn't crap. Plus Juslim sounds funny.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:01, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Bunco

Keep
Delete
  • How does this crap survive for so long? --Anyone 02:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Just so Modusoperandi, or whatever his name is knows, this is crappy, crappy, crap crap crap, covered in crap, coated in crap, and then sprinkled with little bits of crap, then eaten and crapped out. That's what this article is. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:35, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. See above. --Hhamdy283 00:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Crunk

Keep
Delete

Cleaning Out The Crap--Theo 01:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Stoopid Pointless, random, crappy. --Anyone 01:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Sounds like it's make a pretty cool energy drink, but a horrible article. Bye-bye. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 20:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • 17:13, 13 October 2006 Famine huffed "Crunk" (VFD'd)

QWNED

Keep
Delete
  • Found this on the recent changes. It is bad. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It's more than bad. It's totally unnecessary. And bad.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Obviously that letter is entirely fake, as we all know George Bush signs his letters with "G Bizzle."--Anyone 01:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Navy

Keep
Delete
  • Ugly Stubbins--Theo 21:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Wasn't Ugly Stubbins a blues guitarist? Oh, and delete.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Dod Gammit. Im sick of gay-related navy jokes! Men of Sea (read:Seamen) are not to be taken lightly! --Anyone 01:47, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Sucks --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 06:58, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Roh Moo-hyun

Keep
Delete
  • Doo-doo.--The One and Only Czar Yah 20:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Undeserving of an NRV if you ask me; more like a QVFD. But we can do it this way too if you want. --Anyone 20:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • <cough> You did notice the NRV that's a mere 17 hours old, right?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I noticed Czar put it up here anyway, but to me it doesn't deserve a NRV, it deserves a quick and merciless death. The topic is going nowhere(where can it go?), the author has abandoned it, and he/she was never going to make anything out of it. Also, you might want to get that cough checked out, it sounds bad. --Anyone 01:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
    • I used to yell at people for doing that kind of crap here in the past. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Drew Barrymore

Keep
Delete
  • Booo. It starts out innocent enough (innocent, yet still crappy) but then it crosses over into the land of "pink asses" and "defacation," which is a land few wish to enter. --Anyone 20:21, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Commander of the IDF?! WTF? -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 20:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • At least she's not commander of the IDF until 2022. That's something, I guess.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • She could do better than General Halutz if she weren't also a pink rabbit.---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 21:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Barrymore-a Assahola. --Hhamdy283 22:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Someone didn't read HTBFANJS.
Comments
  • 13:28, 13 October 2006 Guest huffed "Drew Barrymore" (VFD)

Serious Cybernetics Corporation

Keep
Delete
  • ahh. The cool, refreshing taste of cliche. --Anyone 19:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kind of maybe promising, but no.--The One and Only Czar Yah 20:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Tastes like "Tab". Blech!--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:11, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I stopped reading it seriously after the Steve Ballmer bit. -- Hindleyite 20:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy. Wow, a failed attempt at a Hitchhiker's Guide reference.
Comments
  • 17:12, 13 October 2006 Famine huffed "Serious Cybernetics Corporation" (VFD'd)

Post-it note

Keep
Delete
  • Lame like a duck...a duck that is lame. (in case there was any confusion) --Anyone 19:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • That's some random thing they've got. There. I think this page just ate 10 IQ points...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • A disgrace to random humour. -- Hindleyite 20:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I read the first line. I daren't read the rest. --Hhamdy283 22:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • 17:11, 13 October 2006 Famine huffed "Post-it note" (VFD'd)

Carpal tunnel syndrome

Keep
Delete
  • teh ghey. Literally...that man is NEARLY NAKED. --Anyone 19:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Die die die. Al Gore jokes? Is it 1998 again?--Procopius 20:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Erm, nope (Thumbs up).-- Hindleyite 20:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Should send the writer back to 1998. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 20:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. First line-good start. The rest makes my sad. --Hhamdy283 22:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • 17:11, 13 October 2006 Famine huffed "Carpal tunnel syndrome" (VFD'd)


Execution

Keep
Delete
Comments

Mr Jihad

Keep
Delete
Comments

Hardcore kids

Keep
  • Keep - I coulda written this. Of course, I'd have written it better - David Gerard 20:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Note: I have reverted it to an earlier, longer revision for reassessment. -- Hindleyite 16:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Angela Keslar

Keep
  • Keep -- We can rebuild it. Go look at About Angela Keslar and tell me this woman is not a fit subject for Uncyc. Shit, if Angela wrote that page she could write for Uncyc and beat 95% of us at our own game. ----OEJ 19:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment:None of those arguments serve as very good justification for keeping the article that we currently have. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Away With It! Half vanity, half unfunny drivel about some fashion designer I never heard of. MAYBE Codeine's Mum has heard of her. Maybe she likes fashion... But I don't recall gowns being a source of riproaring comedy. My pants and their contents? Maybe. --Theo 21:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • wtf? Dumb, random "facts", and crappy. --Anyone 14:10, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Shoot with a handgun. -- Hindleyite 17:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy. This is about as funny as my pants, except my pants are funnier. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 19:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Headbanging

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. As a person who headbangs on a regular basis, this offends me. --Hhamdy283 04:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed. Most articles hurt me, this is no exceptions. I'm going to read hammer now, and laugh. --Theo 15:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Sigh. I ask you, was the bolding really necessary? --Anyone 15:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Blow it the hell up. I think I'm going to headbang now. The real kind. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 17:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • No thanks--Theo 21:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Bjørnar Pettersen

Keep
Delete
  • Stinks of vanity and suck. What do you guys think? —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)21:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill eeet! I had it on qvfd under the thought that Codeine's Mom wasn't it's friend. All hail Codeine's Mum!--Theo 21:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Hanging's too good for 'em. -- Village IdiotKUN Free Speech 21:31, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Damnit. He just changed Chuck Norris facts to "Bjornar Pettersen" facts, and Chuck Norris Facts are just old Vin Diesel facts, and Vin Diesel Facts all came from Bill Brasky (TO BILL BRASKY!) --Anyone 14:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Who knew that Benson had family in Europe?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • (Grumbles) -- Hindleyite 17:42, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Bill Brasky once ate an entire Vietnamese village on a dare. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 19:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.----OEJ 19:42, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Ottawa

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Fucking lame. I live in the sonnabitch and I don't find anything here funny. --Hhamdy283 03:34, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Stoopid. I don't understand how people can create random bullshit and call it humour. --Anyone 15:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet. That's what some people seem to think Uncyc is about. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 17:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Could the first paragraph be any more random? Could the rest be less bad? and just what the hell is an Ottawa, anyway?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and nominate Hhamdy283 to write an Ottawa that sucketh not the bratwurst.----OEJ 19:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

I'll get around to writing a new version of this soon. I write a lot better when I'm sleep deprived. --Hhamdy283 22:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Hide and Creep

Keep
  • hmm. I never saw the movie, but the article atleast has time put into it; as it's not complete bullshit. I don't think it should be VFD'd yet. --Anyone 15:07, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Jay

Keep
  • Keep. I kind of like it. Should be extended though. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 16:11, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • UNDER CONSTRUCTION: In the middle of making funny. Mr. Briggs Inc. 17:30, 8 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
  • Not only is it not funny, it's not even our joke that's being not funny - David Gerard 00:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed. Be original or go home. --Onion 02:11, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Fire --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:45, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Buggrit, millenium hand and shrimp. This article sucks. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 19:39, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: I'm not seeing sufficient funny here. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • I liked it when I first wrote it, but then again, I was an IP back then. Then again, someone added something... then again, it didn't match the tone of the stub... gah, can't decide. Either build on it or smash it. --Ж Kalir totally not Wario at all 03:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


Aldershot

Keep
Delete
  • I killed Kung Chav through QVFD, but this one managed to live. Let's end the saga. --Onion 03:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah but... what if I get stabed[sic] and my dead body gets fucked? --Anyone 15:19, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Lame. Remove this eyesore! —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 17:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • The strongest possible endorsement to delete Aldershot from the face of the earth Uncyc. -- Hindleyite 18:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Rush

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Rush kicks ass. This article, however, does not. --Hhamdy283 03:19, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed. --Onion 03:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Meh. Poor Thundercats...does no one have any decency anymore?! --Anyone 15:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Not a single word about one of Liverpool's all time greatest football players. -- Hindleyite 18:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Cyrillic

Keep

remove from VFD - i've Яe-wЯitteи it completely.--no, yuo Tanks-12px chat 14:44, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Lamp. I like it better when I can't read it. --Anyone 15:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Rewrite. The topic could likely be written in an amusing format, but at current it's too much of a strain to even understand for it to be amusing.--Theo 21:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Article rewrite => kept: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Dani California

Keep
Delete
  • Ugly, stupid, delete. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill! It's a worthless piece of crap. --Onion 03:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's like a party in my mouth...and everyone is vomiting. --Hhamdy283 03:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • teh ghey. In the author's defense, the song sucks too, so it stands to reason the article had a good chance of sucking. --Anyone 15:10, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Smash! —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 17:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • You're right. It sucks. -- Hindleyite 18:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • This article wins a prize, and that prize is suck. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Tsunami

Keep
Delete
  • It's terrible. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I couldn't redeem it, for it never had a soul.--Theo 00:19, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. I've lost more of my faith in humanity. --Onion 01:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ugh. --Hhamdy283 03:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • wtf? Who thinks this kind of shit is a good idea? --Anyone 15:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • The little vanity comment at the end made my mind up for me. Besides, I didn't laugh once. -- Hindleyite 18:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Posers

Keep
Delete
Comments

Loop

Keep
Delete
  • Looks familiar. And is shit. Aaadddaaammm 06:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Hero's Vocal Cords

Keep
Delete
  • Found it through Hero. Complete and total crap. --Onion 04:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 06:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Now this is more like the crap that belongs on VFD. --Anyone 15:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Hero

Keep
  • Keep. This is genuine satire -- a hero defined as "someone with bad free time management skills" is very nice. Needs expansion, but is neither stupid nor worthless.----OEJ 14:52, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree with Jack, No effort? Are you insane? Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • VFD is for crap. This is not that.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:07, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. S'got potential. I removed the Romeo Dallaire line because that's a very Canadian "joke" (note:not a joke, statement of fact), and the average person much less the average Canadian won't get it. Or because I'm full of turkey and fixins and I can't think straight. --Hhamdy283 03:28, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • What? Why is this even on VFD? This isn't even close to crap.--Anyone 15:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, now it's been expanded. -- Hindleyite 17:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Too old for an NRV. --Onion 04:28, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. In light of recent expansion, I vote keep. --Onion 01:10, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Expanded somewhat. ----OEJ 19:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Just a further note -- in its form as of 10/7/06 the article was quite a lot shorter than it now is and had no piccies, so the original nomination to VFD was reasonable at that time. ----OEJ 15:17, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Forrest Gump

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. See Uncyclopedian cliche. --Hhamdy283 03:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. Has nothing to do with subject. --Onion 04:19, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Was this plagiarized from a Hitler article and the names changed?----OEJ 14:48, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Hey! So that's what crap looks like.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Crap No explanation needed. --Anyone 15:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Ruddy hell -- Hindleyite 18:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Wow, someone made a random person into Hitler. Impressive. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:44, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

ZFGC

Keep
Delete
Comments

Straightedge

Keep
Delete
Comments

Kenny Rogers

Keep
Delete
  • Kill. Not funny and gave me a headache. --Onion 20:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Lame. --Hhamdy283 03:15, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Vast gay conspiracy

Keep
Delete
  • This could have been NRV'd, but it's too old. --Onion 19:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

How the fuck did we miss this article in two forest fires and the NRV tag? Deleted to prevent a mass miscarriage of justice; voting never open, really. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)20:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Angus MacAskill

Keep
Delete
Comments

INTERNETWAR!!1

Keep
Delete
  • Stoopid. Dumb, cliche, and old. On a side note, this VFD stuff is oddly satisfying and fulfilling. --Anyone 15:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm trying to think how to make this into an article that isn't just some sort of mass vanity piece and I'm not managing it - David Gerard 15:57, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. See comment. --Onion 19:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --~ Tophatsig 01:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet Baleet Baleet Baleet Baleet!!!!! --General Insineratehymn 03:57, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • This appears to be an article about how Ebaum's World steals all the content on the site. Personally, I don't give two shits about it, but some people do and it has unfortunately made it to Uncyc. There would probably be a great way to parody this, but I'm not doing it and probably no one else will. --Onion 19:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • If you slaved over a photoshop and Eric put it on his site with absolutely no credit to you, how would you feel? If he gave credit where credit is due and asked for author permission nobody would care. --~ Tophatsig 01:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Evolutionary psychology

Keep
Delete
  • Crap. Hasn't been touched in a while, and might not ever be touched again. --Anyone 15:06, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Brisbun

Keep
Delete
  • Non-edible, stale pun... I mean, bun. -- The Colonel (talk) 14:47, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah. Looks like someone might of put work into it at some point in time, but now it's just an orphaned little baby...and a stupid orphaned little baby at that. --Anyone 14:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Pun-ish it --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Blacktown

Keep
Delete
  • One listy piece of trash. -- The Colonel (talk) 14:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • wtf?. No explanation needed. --Anyone 14:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Sweep it under the carpet for the rats to eat -- Hindleyite 19:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. End it. --Hhamdy283 03:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Howto: avoid tentacle rape

Keep
  • Keep - possibly distasteful and should be kept away from small children and animals, but it IS funny. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 14:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. You beat me to it by like, 3 seconds. --Anyone 14:34, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Definite Keep I realize a lot of you find it crude, but it's satirical and funny (to those who can look past the porn part of it). It's not some random gibberish crap that most people throw up there. And it's not just crude potty humour. Is no one seeing the avoid part of the title?! Just because some people think it's "gross" or "horribly revolting" doesn't mean it should be deleted. That's as bad as getting rid of something because it offends somebody. Uncyc isn't here to be politically correct, or so I thought. [end /rant] --Anyone 14:34, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It's poking fun at a bizarre subset manga/anime.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I am disgusted and appalled. As such, this article is required - David Gerard 15:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • David's disgusted and appalled? Sign me up! Oh, and I should move this to "HowTo:Avoid tentacle rape" or somesuch. Maj Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) (20:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC))
  • Keep I actually think this article is quite funny, so long as you're the type of person who is not offended easily, such as myself. --General Insineratehymn 04:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Never said it was revolting or gross, and true we aren't about PC around here, I just found it not funny to the extreme...-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 14:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Sorry, didn't mean that you said it was revolting or gross. People in general, especially when I made the horrible mistake of VFHing it. --Anyone 14:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Hey, can I leave a comment down here too? Cool. It is more spacious than I thought. That painting really sets of the room nicely.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • That's a private party! get out! -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 15:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
    /me Frown <stomp, stomp, stomp. Slams door. Stares into the living room window, longing for a place to call home. Remembers...heads home. Calls it home>--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:45, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 03:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Angus Young

Keep
  • Meh. Although not funny, it's got a few edits and looks like maybe someone will do something with it...eventually. Changed Vote --Anyone 13:45, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
    comment Unless that someone is you, it'll never get done.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • I really don't know what to say about this one. Whoever put effort into this wasted their time. It uses such memes as Chuck Norris, and although there may be one chuckle in the article, most of it is random superfluous crap. There's a lot of room for improvement, so much so that I feel it just needs to be deleted and hopefully restarted again someday...someday... --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It's meh. The Oompah Loompah bit, however, fills me with something resembling a mild form of rage (because they aren't green, duh).--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:34, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • alright. Like hell i'm going to do something constructive! --Anyone 15:57, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Second sentence-hilarious. Everything else-Uncyclopedian cliche. --Hhamdy283 03:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Jared Leto

Keep
Delete
  • Okay. First of all, it's full of random bullshit. I know at first glance that it appears to be fine, but there's no links in the text, the format is all wrong, it sucks, and we all know that Jared Leto is an asshole. It would also be nice if this article were categorized, but it's not, which is part of the reason that this thing ultimately needs to be deleted and/or rewritten. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Stoopid. I'd say keep on account of it actually has something instead of most crap but it hasn't been touched since June and really sucks t3h c0ck. --Anyone 13:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Stomp it to the ground.-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 14:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Public enemy

Keep
Delete
  • Kill due to overuse of anachronism and stupidity. --Onion 23:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill or total rewrite just not very funny. Surely there's some mileage out of a silly name like flavor flav? Besides, the world's greatest hip hop group needs some merciless ribbing deserving of their status. Pewpewpew 00:54, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • wtf?. Pointless, stupid, dumb. And all the stuff above this. --Anyone 13:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • SHOW NO MERCY'-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 14:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agree with Pew3. -- Hindleyite 19:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

The League of Extraordinary People

Keep
Delete
  • Delete: Crappy article with a craptacular list. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Dumb. Didn't even read most of it; the crappity of it was so obvious. This one doesn't even have a good title. --Anyone 16:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ----OEJ 01:06, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It doesn't mention me. This is bullshit! BULLSHIT I TELL YOU. Delete. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I'd vote keep if the page was called "The List of Extraordinary People".--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Handy hint: all list sections are shit or become shit. All articles that are all list sections ... guess - David Gerard 16:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Not so extraordinary -- Hindleyite 19:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Bad parody of The League of Extrordinary Gentleman --~ Tophatsig 01:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Really bad parody, crappy list of people. --General Insineratehymn 04:09, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

The League of Extraordinary Grandmas

Keep
Delete
Comments

Uglo-Americans

Keep
  • Keep. Don't think it needs a delete just yet, but it does need a lot of work, and a lot more actual humour.

--Anyone 16:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep. It has serious potential. I mean, a few more funny of Starr Jones and who knows, it could be good

--abalonesnail 21:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Delete
  • Delete: I find the humor of this article to be substantially lacking. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's over a year old and still ugly: lacks depth, basically a bash-job: a few sentences and then a list of people the authors don't like. *shrug*----OEJ 00:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • killkillkill oh I hate bitterness like this. Cruel humour is way tougher than this (and funnier)Pewpewpew 01:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. End it. --Hhamdy283 00:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

W.E.I.R.D.

Keep
Delete
  • Destroy. It's a list and it's stupid. While you're at it, kill the redirect page at W.E.I.R.D --Onion 15:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: List == bad. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • What?. Not a good idea mixes with not a good sense of humor = wtf? --Anyone 16:34, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Very much so. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:55, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ----OEJ 00:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Listcruft -- Hindleyite 19:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Personal tools
projects