Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive42

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Saxony

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Do I really need to say anything? Just go to it. Destroy. --Hhamdy283 06:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Sucks. -- Spacer Spacer PremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 07:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Irradiate with that uranium. --Sbluen 07:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, and why do we have to bolden the word "delete" or similar if it's obvious as per the section we're voting in? ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, boring, stupid. Vembloud 08:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Crud -- Hindleyite 14:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Utter rubbish. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  Icons-flag-us  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 18:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, although "saxophone" is a good pun. -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 21:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Just to prove I can write that word. -- Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 22:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Eiffel Tower

Keep
  • Keep This is substandard, but not VFD material. It can be improved and I think I can be the one to do that. Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC) YES! IT'S ME! Eh?
  • Keep as long as someone's going to work on it. -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 22:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep the picture...-- Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 22:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete Sucks. Not funny, yadda yadda yadda. Usual crap. Destroy it until it's dead. --Hhamdy283 00:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  Icons-flag-us  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 01:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. A completely random link to Google under the name "The Almighty Oracle"? The picture's mildly clever, though. -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 01:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Sucks. -- Spacer Spacer PremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 07:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh... see ^. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Something new could be made out of this picture of the fallen tower. Vembloud 08:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Looks promising with the pic and is pretty well formatted... but it sucks. Randomness abounds -- Hindleyite 14:31, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

I'm going to rewrite this article, but I'll need some help, what about that picture Vembloud? Mr. Briggs Inc. 10:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?

Generic Black Guy

Keep
Delete
  • Delete With great, great, great shame, I must admit that I am the majority contributor to this article. This is really stupid, and it's haunting me. Please, end this article while I end my shame and commit seppuku. --Hhamdy283 23:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's not that terrible, but it needs work, and I'm guessing from the above that it's not going to get any. -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 23:26, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet. This is awful. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  Icons-flag-us  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 01:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I feel like I should be offended, but I'm not.. -- Spacer Spacer PremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 07:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete should've been NRV'd. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Vembloud 08:43, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Yep. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 13:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • I stumbled across this, and it was worse. This is an improvement, as amazing of a concept that is. The concept is simply too stupid to improve. --Hhamdy283 07:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • It's gone -- Hindleyite 13:05, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Dr Strangelove or: How I learned to stop worrying, sit down and relax for a bit, try and read or something, maybe eat a cheese sandwich, but basically do anything other than obsessively think about being obliterated in a massive nuclear explosion

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Stupid title, stupid article, just stupid. It could've been better, it was already NRV'ed a while ago and was never improved. It should've been huffed then. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  Icons-flag-us  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Do it now, and get a free iPod! --Hhamdy283 01:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Making a parody of a satire must be tough, if this is the best they can do.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh... (that's "Eughhh" spelt in... erm... Martian? Perhaps?) that's bad. And that's just the title I'm talking about. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 08:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Whoa, this was deleted? After not even a day of being at VFD? Crazy. Anyway, just wanted to go on record and say that I thought the article title alone was hysterical. The article had a few good bits (admittedly not many) but I don't think it warranted deleting. Would some kind admin wanna throw it on a subpage for me so's I can fix it up? Please? -- Imrealized ...hmm? 12:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

  • I'd have deleted it on sight. But it's now at User:Imrealized/Strangelove if you really think you can make it better. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 14:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Thanks... I'll begin work on it as soon as the swelling goes down. And yes, that is a quadruple entendre, but I'm mainly talking about the ocean, you pervs. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 03:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Tintin

Keep
Delete
Comments

War on Love

Delete
  • Delete Way too short and not funny. -- Shade 6:44 September 5, 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Noobscape

Keep
Delete
  • Destroy It's blank for crap's sake. -- Shade 6:50, September 5 2006 (UTC)
Comments


Oliver

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Apparently this survived an NRV tag somehow, so I'm putting it here. I found it whilst hunting down "...approves" templates... Yuck.  c • > • cunwapquc?01:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Uck. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete this, because it's too stupid even to qualify as slandanity. -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 07:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete This is what happens when we let 13 year olds use the internet. Vanity article, or a parallel to himself. --Hhamdy283 17:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Put it to sleep. -- Hindleyite 18:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Another boring page. --Sbluen 21:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Pages that use external links as their punchline make me sad.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Looks like a personal problem.----OEJ 23:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

McRib

Keep
Delete
  • Delete!. This article is completely stupid. It's not funny, and its completely incoherent. It's not stupid-funny, it's just stupid and immature.--hhamdy283 22:53 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't know, I found it perfectly coherent. The formatting is simple, the English is fine. I had no problem finding the jokes, understanding them completely, and realizing that they were not funny. --Falcotron 23:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed, not very funny. Better than some of the crap on here, but still. Also, too short. -- Hindleyite 18:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I too agree, also. It's tough to make the Holocaust funny.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • I just thought it was incoherent because there isn't a clear idea or flow. Alot of articles are like that, but this is unbearable in such a regard. And to agree with Falcotron, it is not funny.--hhamdy283 23:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Worst page ever

Keep
Delete
  • Huff Away: It's horrible. They try to be funny by being stupid later down the page, with the 'we must have bad grammar.. so hre geos lol..' joke, and it isn't funny. --Lassaris 10:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. One-eyed Jack, I don't think the author was really trying to be stupid-funny; I think he was actually trying to be just stupid: to literally write the worst page ever. I'm not sure he succeeded (I mean, there's not even any slanderous vandalism), but it's certainly bad enough to be deleted. --Falcotron 19:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Just Godawful. It's terrible. It's not funny, and it's completely idiotic. Absolutely deserves to be huffed. --hhamdy283 22:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Worst meta-humor ever. --Sbluen 05:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: A disaster in meta-humor! So obvious, so blunt, you'll wonder why nobody else created this article! Then you'll realize everyone else had some clue what meta-humor is! --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:31, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Just kill it. -- Hindleyite 18:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Neutral. Boring article. Copied section should be about 3 sentences, not 30, for one thing. And the article is go-nowhere shallow.----OEJ 15:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Banxy

Keep
Delete
  • Terminate. Incoherent beyond repair. --Admiral06 03:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Nevermind, Already Huffed. --Admiral06 04:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Fucker

Keep
Delete
Comments

F*^$ing executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 16:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

1227

Keep
Delete
  • Mime Mame. I found this through a template. It is utter crap. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete this; I was just about to VFD it myself. Good find. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • D-Stroy That is all. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. He spent 4 months improving it, but then seems to have given up. --Falcotron 05:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff this mother. Same story; not funny, stupid, immature. Huff away. --hhamdy283 22:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Eradicate. Immature, 'leet'. Enough said. -- Hindleyite 18:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Ouroboros

Keep
Delete
  • Ouroboros makes me very sad and confused. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • DELETE. Please, make it go away. Not funny, and DiZ whores it on IRC too much. Also makes my eyes bleed. -- Sign2 SarinZero (blabber ) Sign2 00:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Ouroboros gets pwnt.--Sbluen 00:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill utter incoherency, please. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us  Holla | CUN 03:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ridiculous. It should have been written better, or better yet, not written at all. --Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  Icons-flag-us  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy the symbol of Torment. Redundancy is only funny when the article's name is Redundancy. --EvilZak 06:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • PILLAGE. It sucks and is crowded with stupid images and templates. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:57, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy it until it is dead. Makes no sense. Please, end the children's suffering and delete this motherfucker. --hhamdy283 22:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • My personal take is that Ouroboros uses l337 in a kind of Madison-Avenue + Orwellian newspeak. If I took the ardickle at face value -- as a kid-l33t paean to a way dank mythological thingie -- then I probably would vote to baleete. However, my personal take may be all in my head (along with the toilet plunger, which I have been trying to find for several weeks...)----OEJ 15:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Just as a note, you can put this in your userspace and keep it there. As an article, it serves no purpose though. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:36, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Enslaved and Rejected Brickmasons

Keep
Delete
  • Delete because it's a horrible parody of the Wikipedia article (Enslaved (band)). --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 19:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's badly written, ugly, and completely without comedic merit, as well as being a horrible parody. --OpenFaceSurgery 21:40, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Very boring. --Sbluen 00:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ----OEJ 04:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. You could write a funny parody of masonic conspiracy theories; try again. --Falcotron 05:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not much there, I'm afraid.  c • > • cunwapquc? 01:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Y'all can delete if it you think it sux that bad, but I must correct the first comment above: It has absolutely NOTHING to do with "Enslaved (band)" article. This is the first I've heard of that article. The article in question, re: "the Brickmasons" is merely a spin-off stub from the Montana article, and the concept is a parodic conflation of conspiracy theories about the ["Free and Accepted"] Masons and "the Freemen," the latter group having caused a stand-off with the FBI in Eastern Montana some years ago.

Paloumpis Arabia

Keep
Delete
  • BURN. Apparent vanity (no entry on WP, no google hits), and author keeps removing maintainence tags. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us  Holla | CUN 18:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Really stupid; doesnt make any sense.--Redribbbon 19:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Looks like a private joke, poorly done.----OEJ 19:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't understand how this is supposed to be funny. --OpenFaceSurgery 21:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's a shame that someone put so much effort into this article about some guy down the hall that he doesn't like. --Falcotron 05:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 16:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Dogan

Keep
Delete
  • This page sucks, it is a page created by some IP who spends way too much time gaming. Admiral06 05:14, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: This looks better served by QVFD. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 05:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Delete. Kill it via QVFD or any other way possible.----OEJ 19:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I could be mistaken, but it looks like a personal attack on someone, or a rant by some idiot who doesn't know that Uncyclopedia is not his or her personal forum. --OpenFaceSurgery 21:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ugly, crap, unfunny. -- Sign2 SarinZero (blabber ) Sign2 00:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't like to vote against things I don't get, but I don't want to get this one. --Falcotron 04:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Sorry for that, I'm not entirely used to the Uncyclopedian System yet. --Admiral06 06:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • You were in the right ballpark, at least. A lot closer than a lot of people get. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 23:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Artemis Fowl

Keep
  • This is hilarious, but it needs to be expanded (and grammar doctored with better word choice). Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:11, 27 August 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
  • Recently rewritten, but both the rewrite and the original suck. Spang talk 02:39, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes, it's bad.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:12, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Awful offal.----OEJ 19:28, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ye gods, that's terrible. --OpenFaceSurgery 21:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Wow. That's horrifying. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 23:29, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Grammar like this makes my eyes bleed. -- Sign2 SarinZero (blabber ) Sign2 00:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Yes, if it were completely rewritten as a different article, it could be really funny. --Falcotron 04:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Soul Patrol

Keep
Delete
  • Not at all funny, plus it doesn't really fit in with anything else. Utter nonsense. --OpenFaceSurgery 01:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete because it's ugly and stupid. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Or, better, revert to the one-line vandalized version, which was funnier than this, and then delete that. --Falcotron 03:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It sounds like a blaxploitation film. There's a page there...hmmmm. My nimble fingers, sadly, are currently occupied. Maybe later...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments


Trent Reznor

Keep
Delete
  • This isn't funny, even outside the lists. It is too random to understand. --Sbluen 03:58, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
  • This article violates and desecrates, but doesn't really penetrate. Fuck it like an animal. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:42, 24 August 2006
  • Die. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us  Holla | CUN 06:28, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

(UTC)

  • I recently wrote Uncyclopedia:Writing lists because of too much crap like this. --EvilZak 07:23, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
  • It's an intro followed by a list, followed by a list, followed by a list, followed by a list.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
  • This is the first day of its last days. EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I refuse to quote ancient NIN songs, but otherwise, I agree. Someone made this article up to hurt himself. There is no funny joke, there is only lists. I mean, it becomes less defined as lines go by, fades away, you might say it loses focus. Ack, sorry... <s>OnlyKill --Falcotron 21:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)</s>
Comments I made a rewrite of this for PLS at User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/Trent Reznor. It, too, sucks, but it is somewhat an improvement. However, I can't move it because it has been protected, so if people like my version better, or more importantly, an admin likes my version better, please move it to Trent Reznor. Thank You. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A20:28, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Killerfurbies

Keep
Delete
  • KILL! Vanity crap about users on some website, edited by all IPs, who keep removing maintainence tags. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us  Holla | CUN 01:24, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments


XZ7-543532465-346ASDF000037 B

Keep
Delete
Comments

Kage Bushin No Jutsu

Keep
Delete
Comments

It doesn't matter what your answer is so long as you feel good about it math

Keep
  • It makes sense and it might be a little bit funny. --Sbluen 03:59, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
  • It starts off well, then goes downhill--but I don't think it needs huffing. I like the way it reads like a conservative making fun of a liberal making fun of conservative propaganda. --Falcotron 06:18, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I thought it was hilarious.--Wit (tawk) 06:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
  • This could become something great with a bit of expansion. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:49, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
DeleteWaste of space. --- Jaques Pirat IS NOT FRENCH! TP, F@H 21:00, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Kept with a {{fix}} tag. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 05:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Richard M Stallman Vs. Linus Torvalds

Keep

Wait. But I laughed when I read it. Wit on Richard M Stallman and Linus Torvalds slanderous accusations --

Delete
Comments
  • Neutral. Comments, though: article is 4 days old, and I've revised stuff for longer than that with my head tied behind my back. I rather like quote arrays that argue with each other; on the other hand, this example sucks doorknobs.----OEJ 01:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Someone besides the author made an edit earlier today; I'll reserve judgement and see if it goes anywhere. --Falcotron 06:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
  • It's a bit of a linux in joke, but if you think it's crap, then I won't protest the deletion. It seems a tad hasty, IMHO. If you think it's not funny, surely, it should be tagged improve rather than delete: it has potential as a concept --Gunny 07:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC) (author)

Emulation Galaxy

Keep
Delete
  • Vanity page about some forum or website or other. Technically is allowed with the current vanity "policy", but lots of web drama being brought here because of it. May just be best to delete it. May well have humour in it, I didnt really check. Spang talk 03:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • BURN! Awful. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us  Holla | CUN 03:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It seems to bounce back and forth between slandanity and vanity, and I think the prose is so bad because of repeated vandalism and edit warring, but I don't see any version worth reverting to. --Falcotron 05:26, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I have grown to hate redlinks.--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 11:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • This cruft bores me to death. -- The Colonel (talk) 16:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Vanity is one of the 7000 deadly UNCYC sins.-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 16:29, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Avert Thine Eyes killit.--Wit (tawk) 06:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 09:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Gesundheit

Keep
Delete
  • Delete: I'd like to start this one fresh. Oh and I'm a complete ass when it comes to deleting hard work. It's too short, averagely funny, and (place_own_opinion_here_that_you_100%_agree_with). --Lassaris 18:37, 21 August 2006 (GMT+10)
Comments


Furry

Keep
Delete
  • Delete: The main issue here is that Furry is a common word, and common words deserve good articles rather than common articles. I don't think it needs a rewrite, I think it needs a delete and a fresh start.. Oh and it's shit. --Lassaris 9:25, 21 August 2006 (GMT+10)
  • What language is that? Even converted to whatever language it is that I'm typing the page would continue to be whatever the opposite of funny is. Furries is better too (tho' not great).--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:44, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete because it's ugly. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Unsure, now: As some people said, ugly, however, we can revert it back before apparent vandalism, and as another said, we could keep it, it's salvageable, but not great, which makes me unsure whether to keep my delete vote or change. Up to the admin now. --Lassaris 18:39, 21 August 2006 (GMT+10)
  • Comment: I went back and reread the version I linked to, and older versions from before what looks like earlier vandalism, and you know what? None of it is that funny. So now I'm unsure as well. Anyway, can I just pick a version, revert to that, re-add the VFD template, and let everyone vote on the best version instead of the current hopeless one? And then Lassaris and I can both switch our votes, with no net effect.... --Falcotron 09:07, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Nepal

Keep
Delete
  • Listy piece of rubbish. -- The Colonel (talk) 17:09, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Hey, Nepal is a country! A country with a terrible page. I thought someone just didn't know how to spell nipple. So I'm dissapointed, twice.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Blah. --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 21:24, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. Is there a single joke that wouldn't work just as well for, say, French Guiana, Tattooine, or Wikipedia? --Falcotron 01:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Goebbels

Keep
Delete
  • Delete: I lol my hat at this noobflyer. Since being a stubbie wubbie, we've seen no progress.. uhh, no DECENT progress on it. Basically, lack of images, lack of humour, lack of length. Lack of chance? --Lassaris 12:46am, 21 August 2006 (GMT+10)
  • Total garbage. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Blah. --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 21:25, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete this piece of brilliant pro-Christian propaganda, because it almost converted me. Fortunately, I realized just in time that if God is the opposite of Goebbels, he's not the opposite of Hitler, so I'll stick to worshipping Falco, may he forgive me for wavering. --Falcotron 01:54, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Detroitington

Keep
Delete
  • Delete: full of red links, not very funny, no connection to reality or known fantasy or explanation for its existence. -Drdisque 23:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. There must be some point to this article, and I'm afraid someone might tell me what it is. --Falcotron 05:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Doesn't seem to have a destination, but the trip's the important part right? Alksub 06:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Deletington. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Don't like it.--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 11:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Quadspork

Keep
Delete
  • Delete: My first article- crap. Pure crap. --Uncyclotron9xw 16:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Merlin youth theatre

Keep
Delete
  • Delete: Red Link List Article, NRV tag removed to add said list, earmarks of vanity, random-person humor, dry article, all that good stuff VFD thrives on! --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 20:45, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Deleted Vanitycruft. Fails numerous UN quality standards - UN:DEL and UN:VAIN. May fail UN:NRV purely because it may actually exist. Definitely fails UN:HTBFANJS for various reasons, including listcruft. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 22:19, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Fellatio

Keep
Delete
  • Bunch of incoherent quotes, Wilde, Your Mom and Oprah. Enough said. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 19:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: When the quotes take up more space than the article, even WITH the picture, that's a problem. Or it's the most quoteable smackdown of all time. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 20:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Odd, this is the first time I've ever been disappointed by fellatio. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per Moduspoperandi. --GeorgeRI.jpg» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) Spacer Spacer Spacer Spacer Spacer Spacer Icons-flag-gb 30px-Coatsmxa.png Spacer Spacer Spacer Icons-flag-us Spacer Spacer Spacer 22:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - too little content, too many quotes, not really a chuckle. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 23:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy. That's a list of quotes. Keep the recreation option though; UN might want "Fellatio" around. Alksub 06:08, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I agree with Alksub; someone could write a funny fellatio article, but they haven't yet. --Falcotron 06:12, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete! - Deletion on Fellatio -- The Colonel (talk) 15:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 19:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Pentrox

Keep
Delete
  • Shitty cruft from the unfunny users of GameFAQs. --EvilZak 05:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Huffing is good. --UNKNOWNFILE 14:57, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: unfunny gamercruft, looks like it was written by a 12 year old chronic bed wetter. -Drdisque 23:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Huffination Alksub 06:11, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Even though I don't know the source material, I can guess that it's not very good given that the main joke in the intro is "Also, cocks. Fuck." --Falcotron 06:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • There is no spoon. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:10, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • NRV tag removed by a GameFAQs user. --EvilZak 05:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

"The Legend of Zelda: Rain of Sorrow"

Keep
Delete
  • More shitty cruft from the unfunny users of GameFAQs. Can we please put "made by someone who posts on GameFAQs" in the criteria for quick deletion already? --EvilZak 05:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Crap--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us  Holla | CUN 05:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • PWN IT! --UNKNOWNFILE 14:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Less content than Pentrox makes it less unfunny, but that's the best thing I can find to say about it. --Falcotron 06:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, for I prefer the pumpkin. Alksub 06:29, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • How I despise the 3-line stubs. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • NRV tag removed by a GameFAQs user. --EvilZak 05:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I thought I had NRV'd this before...-- Sir C Icons-flag-us  Holla | CUN 05:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Carlos

Keep
  • Save the moose's article. It was much better as a stub before that idiot rewrote it. I reverted him twice, but he did it again. --Sbluen 03:41, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete

It's too old to NRV and too sucky to keep. Why this article has continued to exist I will never know. Get the hell rid of it. Maj Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 02:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. This was quasi-featured? Was Uncyclopedia really that bad just last year? --Falcotron 02:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Nah, some idiot probably just put it on there, even though the article sucks. H. 02:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
The hilarious addition was by an anonymous IP, and recently too. I doubt very much that its Quasi-quasi-featured status will save it...and the old Sbluen-RV'd version is pure vanity. So it's screwed either way/--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill carlos!!! -- The Colonel (talk) 05:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • delete this; Alksub 06:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment. The old stub isn't that bad, but there doesn't seem to be any reason to believe it'll be reverted and expanded into something funny from that point instead of spiraling further into random nonsense. --Falcotron 06:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

QWERTY (qwerty)

Keep
  • Its not as bad as some "sfkjhb" clone because its a word we all know and i think that adding it to the nonsese pages like AAAAAAAAA! would be cool --Guillo7x 23:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC) (I created it under the ip)
Delete
  • Worthless AAAAAAAAA! clone -- The Colonel (talk) 14:14, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD. 2-day-old clones get huffed. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:32, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Hurry up and take this out already, you lazy admins. I put this on QVFD more than 12 hours ago. --Sbluen 16:50, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Sorry, Guillo7x. Yes, you could probably come up with some good random nonsense with QWERTY, but you need more jokes than just a one-shot parody of AAAAAAAAA!. Off the top of my head: use the whole keyboard and add a Fr:AZERTY page and so forth, somehow get the parts to have their recognizable shapes but also be keyboard-shaped, and--well, you'd better come up with something better that what's on the top of my head.... --Falcotron 23:28, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. STUPIDSTUPIDSTUPIDSTUPIDSTUPIDSTUPIDSTUPID--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 00:22, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Yet another AAAAAAAAA! clone. Without the effort. Or the funny. Even if you don't think AAAAAAAAA! has the funny, this has even less the funny. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 02:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Aaaa! is better because it was first, this page is like all of those crap 'Nam films that came out after Platoon.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
    Are you comparing this page to Full Metal Jacket? I think you owe Kubrick an apology. --Falcotron 03:05, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
    I meant the Casualties of War kind of crap 'Nam movies. There are more that were so bad I've wiped them completely from my mind...and although I didn't mean FMJ, Kubrick stills owes me an apology for Eyes Wide Shut.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:18, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
    God already killed him for Eyes Wide Shut; isn't that enough? --Falcotron 03:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
    Odd that you were infered me including FMJ in "all of those crap 'Nam films" though. If I'd said "all of those 'Nam films" then I'd be tarring FMJ with the brush of displeasure...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
    Well, FMJ was the Nam movie that came out right after Platoon. Although Apocalypse Now was 10 years faster than that.... --Falcotron 03:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

AAAAAAAA. User:Hinoa4/sig1M 06:44, 19 AAAAAA 2006 (AAA)

Melbourne Cup

Keep
  • Keep. I couldn't find a horse racing article, and this is too made-me-laugh to lose. Alksub 06:24, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • I think it's funny. Merge with some horse racing article (I would look for one, but search is not working) then delete.--Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 16:04, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Sarai

Keep
  • No. Instead, I encourage you to try harder. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:19, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Expand. You can do it. I believe in you.--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 21:08, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Me too. Try using the force, or something.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • The article should practically write itself. Do it over. Maj Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 07:08, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I actually liked it, it's better than 90% of the stuff on here. -Drdisque 23:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Looks OK to me. Alksub 06:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC) user of vfd LENGTH-O-VISION
Delete
  • Kill it, for God's sake, kill it: I tried writing this last night, but it's rather mean-spirited and not very funny. Requesting a self-huff.--Procopius 12:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Kept. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 19:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

EverQuest

Keep
Delete
  • De-leet: It's a popular game that could deserve a better uncyclopedia page. I don't play it but this page is crap. Best off to start from the beginning. It doesn't even conform to typical standards of funniness or uncyclopedia formats. :P --Lassaris 9:32, 17 August 2006 (GMT+10)
  • Low adventure, some killing, ED's style of sex, you know. A bad story. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE. What a pot of shite. Two sentences less, and it would be perfect QVFD material. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. At first I didn't get it. Then I realized that in EverQuest, you probably have to do the same thing over and over again, and it gets boring, and it rots your brain, and you write unfunny articles like this. Ah, I see. --Falcotron 16:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Son of a bitch wasted my time. I could have been editing redlinks. --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 21:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per all of the above.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed. Now when the hell am I going to level up again? —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 02:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Binball

Keep
  • Keep - Funny. Alksub 21:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Very weak keep - What's there is funny, but it's just one joke. If nobody intends to expand it, I'll change my vote. --Falcotron 21:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete - Not funny. Imrealized ...hmm? 21:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff. This was originally vanity, but names were changed. Copied from WP. Not at all funny. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us  Holla | CUN 22:44, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete 'cuz this is stupid, regardless of what the fuck it is. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:48, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Only a solid promise of expansion will change my mind. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE. Vanity - names = anonymous vanity. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Blah. --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 00:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete; changing my vote, because nobody's yet said that they intend to expand it. --Falcotron 02:58, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • An NRV is in dispute when some stooge says it is. Alksub 06:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Executed. By the way, Alksub was the contestor. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 06:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


  • Blast! My edit in progress would have almost doubled the length, but too late. I'll see if I can find my world's largest violin. Alksub 07:04, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Template:Someone

Keep
Delete
Comments

IT workers

Keep
Delete
  • Flame it!,(with a flamer, not text) it's just some kid's grumpy rant about IT workers trying to be funny by beind stupid. GRR! Flame it, flame it to hell! --Lassaris 10:27, 15 August 2006 (GMT+10)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE. Uncyc is not a site for true facts. (Sorry, but if the shoe fits...) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Bury the truth. As part of the International Conspiracy of Codemonkeys, I can't allow these secret true facts about us and our brethren the Adminimonkeys get out. Maybe if there were a few lies to disguise it in humor, it'd be different; otherwise, it's too dangerous. Kill it now. From an undisclosed location near Mountain View, India --Falcotron 16:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Didn't even mention baby chickens. How rude.--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 02:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Silly rabbit, everyone knows there are no chicks in IT. --Falcotron 05:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill this article first, and then beat up all those IT nerds. -- The Colonel (talk) 05:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill both. --Sbluen 18:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Rubbish. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 21:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 05:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Marcello pera

Keep
Delete
Comments

Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 02:38, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Aufstralia

Keep
  • Aye, for one, saye keep! its the only link to the abodigitals article. but i kinda agree that it's offensive. u have to be care full with those Abodigitals. they have more rights than us whites, the conquistadors of aufstralia! --Iamcon 15:56, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Armando, only one article per VFD heading, please. I'm counting all votes under the old double heading as being for both, but next time anyone does this, I'll be handing out bans. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 05:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Ay... Snot easy, I tell ya. The two are the same thing. The link from whatever page I found it on is to Abodigitals, but Abodigitals redirects to Auftralia. I just wanted to make sure they were both taken down. Especially since I've put them up for quick deletion twice and nothing happened. The only reason I give a rat's is because it's outright racism. And I'm a little older and wiser than I was last time you banned me for blanking that anti-Semitic shite on UnNews. I know you carry a big stick, so you can walk a little softer. Cheers -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 06:31, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Noted. I'll leave a note to that effect. SErves me right for not checking... Maj Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 07:13, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
No worries. Cheers -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 07:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Take it easy, Hinoa. You are scaring all those noobs away. (Armando is a noob, too.) -- The Colonel (talk) 14:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I looked through Guest's contributions and found that he also NRV'd Saxony and Non Persian, which were both created in 2005. --Sbluen 07:03, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

**Note: Abodigitals is a redirect to this page and should be taken down with it.


Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 02:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Black's Clues

Keep
Delete
  • Delete this because it's horrible, ugly, and dumb. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete this because it's horribly and dumb--but it's not particularly ugly. All that redlinking gives it nice color, and I'm impressed that the author went out of his way to misspell graffiti as grafitti just to spruce things up. --Falcotron 23:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy: The racist first racist paragraph DOES make me racistly ponder the racist need for a racist vocabulary longer than one racist word. Minus twenty points for making 'racist' not even look like a word anymore, and nuke it anyway for being stupid. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 04:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Let it burn in the black fire. --Sbluen 10:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I only discriminate racists and racist nonsense. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:06, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD. Historically speaking, materials that are excessively racist, stupid, and hateful qualify as valid targets for instant deletion. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments


Children of Japan

Keep
Delete
  • Delete: Anything that uses 'evil' or what ever, in that context, is really bad form. It just isn't funny. It's the typical 'these are evil monsters planning to take over the world'.. wtf? /endrant, --Lassaris 9:36pm (GMT+10)
  • Delete: I can't tell if this is a good idea done badly and thus redeemable, or just an attempt at brute-force "humor". I can't tell, but I can decide. Scrap it. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 04:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I think someone got his ass handed to him by some 8-year-old Japanese kid at DDR and decided to rant about it here. --Falcotron 04:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Give it a miserable extermination just for putting Dalek kin and Oprah nearby. --Sbluen 10:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE. These are not my people. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:23, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Throw it to the dingoes. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Everyone knows that ginger kids don't have souls. And I don't eat them.--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 21:03, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 17:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Virgin lawyers

Keep
Delete
  • Delete: This is pure, random nonsense and crap. --Ogopogo 04:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. There are 30-year-old AI experiments that generate funnier random nonsense. --Falcotron 04:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: I was itching to delete this as soon as I read the first sentence. And then it got worse. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 04:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Cabbage is not a form of Magic mushroom. --Sbluen 10:57, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE. I like random humor. Unfortunately, "humor" is sadly missing from this particular equation. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:26, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I hate lawyers and pointless lawyer crufts. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:04, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Zzzzzzzz. --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 21:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 17:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Disassembly

Keep
Delete
Comments

Exterminated. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 21:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Windex

Keep
Delete
Comment: Yeah, that would be funny. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  Icons-flag-us  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 18:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

I left the last word behind for about 5 minutes before I officially executed it. WHEEEEEE! —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 21:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

MIT

Keep
Delete
  • Delete It's simple. Not funny at all. I'm Canadian, and I think he was trying to make some Canadian jokes, but again, just not funny. Also, too short. --Hhamdy283 06:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Too short, not funny. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  Icons-flag-us  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 18:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 18:16, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 14:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The juxtaposition of MIT with the middle of nowhere is funny, but it needs more than one joke (and Mr. T, Grue, etc. don't count). -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 17:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Uh... what? ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 18:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 21:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

2017

Keep
Delete
Comments

Executed. Lemme know if you want that joke, George the 6. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 21:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Recreated and redirected to timeline. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 10:02, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

IPod-people

Keep
Delete
  • Delete: Oh, look, raw, unrefined whining! And that's hilarious! Just not for the intended reasons. And it's hard to point and laugh at a faceless IP address. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, because... yeah, what the Captain said. -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 07:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Enough iPod jokes. I see potential, but no real execution. To quote someone, smash it to bits. -- Hindleyite 18:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Faddish and poorly done.----OEJ 00:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I think this guy just has it out for iPods. Rants are no place for the Uncyclopedia. That's what Wikipedia is for. --Hhamdy283 05:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Uncyclopedia is not for whining because you can't afford an iPod. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  Icons-flag-us  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 18:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Two notes:
  • I considered an Pod People parody, but that's too obvious. And iPod zombies have been done to death (yes, yes, I know, pun, ha ha) all over every one of the internets by now.
  • "A $10 MP3/CD player could do the same thing"? There's 40GB MP3 players for $10? --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, a $10 CD MP3 player with a $10 stack of 57 CDRWs gives you 40GB of storage for about $20. Close? It's a bit bigger, and it takes longer to random-access all of your songs, but it's still not a worthless solution. -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 07:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Really? Where do I find that? I was avoiding iPods because, you know, the battery tends to run down after a year and is hellaciously expensive to replace, but I thought I'd have to pay at least $59. Point me to the cheap one!--Procopius 18:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

The Neo-Cons Discography

Keep
Delete
  • Too many lists and not enought of the good stuff. --Sbluen 05:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: List article and political jokes about as sharp as a bowling ball and as original as that joke I just made. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, because I couldn't find even the dull jokes that CaptainSpam alleges are there. -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 07:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Sure, there are some things that were mildy amusing, but I think for something this long, it should have alot more content and be a whole lot funnier. It's a good idea, but it has been poorly executed in this case. Huff it. --Hhamdy283 17:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Not very good. Too listy. -- Hindleyite 18:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. --GeorgeRI.jpg» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) Spacer Spacer Spacer Spacer Spacer Spacer Icons-flag-gb 30px-Coatsmxa.png Spacer Spacer Spacer Icons-flag-us Spacer Spacer Spacer 21:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete but first move anything resembling witty satire or a good joke to The Neo-Cons, which already has a discography.----OEJ 00:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete but keep anything decent like OEJ said. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  Icons-flag-us  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 18:13, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Oliver

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Apparently this survived an NRV tag somehow, so I'm putting it here. I found it whilst hunting down "...approves" templates... Yuck.  c • > • cunwapquc?01:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Uck. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete this, because it's too stupid even to qualify as slandanity. -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 07:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete This is what happens when we let 13 year olds use the internet. Vanity article, or a parallel to himself. --Hhamdy283 17:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Put it to sleep. -- Hindleyite 18:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Another boring page. --Sbluen 21:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Pages that use external links as their punchline make me sad.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Looks like a personal problem.----OEJ 23:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

McRib

Keep
Delete
  • Delete!. This article is completely stupid. It's not funny, and its completely incoherent. It's not stupid-funny, it's just stupid and immature.--hhamdy283 22:53 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't know, I found it perfectly coherent. The formatting is simple, the English is fine. I had no problem finding the jokes, understanding them completely, and realizing that they were not funny. --Falcotron 23:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed, not very funny. Better than some of the crap on here, but still. Also, too short. -- Hindleyite 18:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I too agree, also. It's tough to make the Holocaust funny.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • I just thought it was incoherent because there isn't a clear idea or flow. Alot of articles are like that, but this is unbearable in such a regard. And to agree with Falcotron, it is not funny.--hhamdy283 23:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Worst page ever

Keep
Delete
  • Huff Away: It's horrible. They try to be funny by being stupid later down the page, with the 'we must have bad grammar.. so hre geos lol..' joke, and it isn't funny. --Lassaris 10:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. One-eyed Jack, I don't think the author was really trying to be stupid-funny; I think he was actually trying to be just stupid: to literally write the worst page ever. I'm not sure he succeeded (I mean, there's not even any slanderous vandalism), but it's certainly bad enough to be deleted. --Falcotron 19:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Just Godawful. It's terrible. It's not funny, and it's completely idiotic. Absolutely deserves to be huffed. --hhamdy283 22:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Worst meta-humor ever. --Sbluen 05:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: A disaster in meta-humor! So obvious, so blunt, you'll wonder why nobody else created this article! Then you'll realize everyone else had some clue what meta-humor is! --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:31, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Just kill it. -- Hindleyite 18:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Neutral. Boring article. Copied section should be about 3 sentences, not 30, for one thing. And the article is go-nowhere shallow.----OEJ 15:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Banxy

Keep
Delete
  • Terminate. Incoherent beyond repair. --Admiral06 03:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Nevermind, Already Huffed. --Admiral06 04:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Fucker

Keep
Delete
Comments

F*^$ing executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 16:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

1227

Keep
Delete
  • Mime Mame. I found this through a template. It is utter crap. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete this; I was just about to VFD it myself. Good find. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • D-Stroy That is all. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. He spent 4 months improving it, but then seems to have given up. --Falcotron 05:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff this mother. Same story; not funny, stupid, immature. Huff away. --hhamdy283 22:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Eradicate. Immature, 'leet'. Enough said. -- Hindleyite 18:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Redirected to timeline. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 10:01, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Ouroboros

Keep
Delete
  • Ouroboros makes me very sad and confused. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • DELETE. Please, make it go away. Not funny, and DiZ whores it on IRC too much. Also makes my eyes bleed. -- Sign2 SarinZero (blabber ) Sign2 00:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Ouroboros gets pwnt.--Sbluen 00:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill utter incoherency, please. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us  Holla | CUN 03:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ridiculous. It should have been written better, or better yet, not written at all. --Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  Icons-flag-us  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy the symbol of Torment. Redundancy is only funny when the article's name is Redundancy. --EvilZak 06:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • PILLAGE. It sucks and is crowded with stupid images and templates. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:57, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy it until it is dead. Makes no sense. Please, end the children's suffering and delete this motherfucker. --hhamdy283 22:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • My personal take is that Ouroboros uses l337 in a kind of Madison-Avenue + Orwellian newspeak. If I took the ardickle at face value -- as a kid-l33t paean to a way dank mythological thingie -- then I probably would vote to baleete. However, my personal take may be all in my head (along with the toilet plunger, which I have been trying to find for several weeks...)----OEJ 15:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Just as a note, you can put this in your userspace and keep it there. As an article, it serves no purpose though. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:36, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Enslaved and Rejected Brickmasons

Keep
Delete
  • Delete because it's a horrible parody of the Wikipedia article (Enslaved (band)). --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 19:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's badly written, ugly, and completely without comedic merit, as well as being a horrible parody. --OpenFaceSurgery 21:40, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Very boring. --Sbluen 00:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ----OEJ 04:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. You could write a funny parody of masonic conspiracy theories; try again. --Falcotron 05:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not much there, I'm afraid.  c • > • cunwapquc? 01:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Y'all can delete if it you think it sux that bad, but I must correct the first comment above: It has absolutely NOTHING to do with "Enslaved (band)" article. This is the first I've heard of that article. The article in question, re: "the Brickmasons" is merely a spin-off stub from the Montana article, and the concept is a parodic conflation of conspiracy theories about the ["Free and Accepted"] Masons and "the Freemen," the latter group having caused a stand-off with the FBI in Eastern Montana some years ago.

Paloumpis Arabia

Keep
Delete
  • BURN. Apparent vanity (no entry on WP, no google hits), and author keeps removing maintainence tags. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us  Holla | CUN 18:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Really stupid; doesnt make any sense.--Redribbbon 19:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Looks like a private joke, poorly done.----OEJ 19:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't understand how this is supposed to be funny. --OpenFaceSurgery 21:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's a shame that someone put so much effort into this article about some guy down the hall that he doesn't like. --Falcotron 05:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 16:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Dogan

Keep
Delete
  • This page sucks, it is a page created by some IP who spends way too much time gaming. Admiral06 05:14, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: This looks better served by QVFD. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 05:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Delete. Kill it via QVFD or any other way possible.----OEJ 19:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I could be mistaken, but it looks like a personal attack on someone, or a rant by some idiot who doesn't know that Uncyclopedia is not his or her personal forum. --OpenFaceSurgery 21:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ugly, crap, unfunny. -- Sign2 SarinZero (blabber ) Sign2 00:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't like to vote against things I don't get, but I don't want to get this one. --Falcotron 04:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Sorry for that, I'm not entirely used to the Uncyclopedian System yet. --Admiral06 06:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • You were in the right ballpark, at least. A lot closer than a lot of people get. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 23:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Artemis Fowl

Keep
  • This is hilarious, but it needs to be expanded (and grammar doctored with better word choice). Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:11, 27 August 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
  • Recently rewritten, but both the rewrite and the original suck. Spang talk 02:39, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes, it's bad.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:12, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Awful offal.----OEJ 19:28, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ye gods, that's terrible. --OpenFaceSurgery 21:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Wow. That's horrifying. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 23:29, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Grammar like this makes my eyes bleed. -- Sign2 SarinZero (blabber ) Sign2 00:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Yes, if it were completely rewritten as a different article, it could be really funny. --Falcotron 04:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Soul Patrol

Keep
Delete
  • Not at all funny, plus it doesn't really fit in with anything else. Utter nonsense. --OpenFaceSurgery 01:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete because it's ugly and stupid. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Or, better, revert to the one-line vandalized version, which was funnier than this, and then delete that. --Falcotron 03:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It sounds like a blaxploitation film. There's a page there...hmmmm. My nimble fingers, sadly, are currently occupied. Maybe later...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Personal tools
projects