Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive4

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


From QuickVFD. Rewritten.

Rewrite --Rcmurphy 16:18, 15 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite- You had me until the "sews the seeds" and mention of "sweatshops" --Repairman Jack 11:50, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

<>s<>Psh.... Granted, the "preparation of Gulag Pie" section is horrible, but that doesn't seem grounds for deletion. I thought the first bit was rather clever when I wrote it, but if nobody else does I suppose I don't have any objections to it being deleted. --Spintherism 20:05, 16 May 2005 (EDT)<>/s<>

I rewrote it and took that nasty sneering Mr. T. off. It's much better now. (In my opinion, at least)--Spintherism 22:59, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

actually thought it was funnier before...ah well, this never should have been a candidate for deletion --slack 20:20, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

My theory is that it was put in quick VFD before I fixed it (as it definitely deserved to be), and certain people were overly eager in their humor nazism and weren't appreciative of my subtle and delightful wit. (Honestly though, I never have any idea if what I write is good or not; if you liked the "preparation of Gulag Pie," by all means, pull it from the history, and I'll spend time I should be doing french homework adding to it, but I'm personally unable to face any sort of criticism, and cannot, therefor be responsible for the resurrection of something that has been criticized) --Spintherism 22:37, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

I've checked the logs and you are correct article history indicates your first changes made at (01:38, 13 May 2005 Spintherism), QuickVFD diff (Revision as of 01:22, 13 May 2005 Carlb) was the update to QuickVFD this, a quarter-hour before you started rewriting it. Original article 00:03, 13 May 2005 was a one-line substub "Gulag eeerr Soviet Union Labour camp system (not sure how to explain this in english)" with no other content. I see no further need for this to be on VFD or QuickVFD. --Carlb 23:16, 18 May 2005 (EDT)


Delete: Two cardinal sins: pluralized title and no meaningful content. --DWIII 05:49, 12 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete-a Thees erteecle-a is cumpletely und utterly vurthless. Bork Bork Bork! --bdanials 05:59, 12 May 2005 (EDT)

Redirect to Sausage. --Rcmurphy 10:41, 12 May 2005 (EDT)

I can't request a Rewrite or Expand as it has already been unsuccessfully done. So Redirect --Repairman Jack 12:36, 12 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Kill it with a blunt spoon. --Goomball 08:33, 13 May 2005 (EDT)

Redirected --Paulgb Talk 21:05, 13 May 2005 (EDT)

Anal stretching

Burned at the stake

From QuickVFD.

Delete --Rcmurphy 17:59, 11 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Repairman Jack 12:37, 12 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Goomball 08:33, 13 May 2005 (EDT)

Recuse on the question of what to do with the current revision but the original [1] and [2] from QuickVFD should be removed --Carlb 11:41, 14 May 2005 (EDT)


From QuickVFD. Deleted

Delete --Rcmurphy 00:23, 11 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Repairman Jack 11:57, 11 May 2005 (EDT)



From QuickVFD.

Rewrite/Expand --Rcmurphy 23:51, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

Expand --Repairman Jack 12:20, 11 May 2005 (EDT)

Intelligent Design


I only really want to get rid of the last two paragraphs, as I don't think they add anything funny to the article. However, I have strong opinions on the subject, so I thought I'd bring it up here. -- 22:42, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite Not my funniest work, but I thought they were funny. Someone can rewrite it. Apparently the pro-Evolutionists have no sense of humor, but instead a strong opinion? --Orion Blastar 10:39, 11 May 2005 (EDT)

Er, Dunno Er sorry am I missing something here, I can't see any problems with it (or anything to have an opionion about), can please expand on his/her objections to it? Thanks --Elvis 11:56, 11 May 2005 (EDT)

Well I kept continuity with the Richard Dawkins entry and Evolution entry, as well as built on it, to provide exceptions to ID so it supports the previous paragraph. None of it is factual, as per Uncyclopedia guidelines. Only way it is not funny, is if the person reading it has a pro-Evolution bias, which I think is the case. In case it is not funny, it can be rewritten, and not deleted. --Orion Blastar 19:17, 11 May 2005 (EDT)
I have a pro-evolution bias. I stated as much. I think I'd pretty much admitted that that might be affecting my sense of humour. This is not to say that I don't find funny anything I disagree with. Of the articles you've written (that I've read), I particularly liked new math. It's just in this case, I didn't really see it.
Ignoring that the additions contradict what was there (which isn't a bad thing in Uncyclopedia) I suppose my feeling was that the two paragraphs you added were not of the same quality of those two lines that were already there. It kind of diluted it, turning a funny, if short article, into a slightly longer, overall less funny article. If it was a separate article on it's own, I probably wouldn't have mind. In this case, it just seemed a bunch of links to other pages done for the sake of linking to other pages.
I'll end this rant here before it turns into an essay, but I'll accept if my sense of humour on this issue isn't on par. That's why I put it up here in the first place.-- 06:18, 12 May 2005 (EDT)
Well I am glad you like New Math, I tend to write about many different things. Eventually there is something that I write that someone will like. Would you mind if I spun it off into a new article? New Intelligent Design or something? Then let someone else rewrite or delete this article? Thanks. --Orion Blastar 20:07, 12 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite What's so bad about koalas? --Repairman Jack 12:19, 11 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite --Rcmurphy 00:27, 12 May 2005 (EDT)

Attempted to rewrite but might still want to lose the greyrat personal attacks? perhaps the various species "...scientifically determined to be products of an Unintelligent Design which also created the greyrat." should be "...scientifically determined to be products of an Unintelligent Design before quickly disappearing in a puff of logic."? --Carlb 17:29, 21 May 2005 (EDT)



From QuickVFD.

Delete Tired, lame joke. --Rcmurphy 13:36, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Could be rewritten but I'm in a bad mood, Delete--Repairman Jack 15:29, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite or Delete definately could be rewritten, but I'm in the middle of finals. --bdanials 02:13, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Could be rewritten, but, you know, it's not worth it. --Uvula Donor 09:36, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

Randall's Circles of Hell

From QuickVFD. Rewritten.

Delete --Rcmurphy 13:36, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Could be rewritten but I'm in a bad mood, Delete--Repairman Jack 15:28, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Hey, is that a macro? [g] --Uvula Donor 09:40, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite - I gave it a little push in some kind of direction but it's still not that funny Sheep 15:56, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite I like the idea of Hell's Food Court. It needs tweaking. --Uvula Donor 09:40, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

  • I've rewritten it a bit further; presumably all food in Hell should be served well-done? --Carlb 02:34, 11 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite It shows promise now. --Rcmurphy 11:10, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

Unfunny jokes about bureaucracy

Kept, consolidated into Category:Unfunny jokes about bureaucracy. Improve - there's the germ of a good idea here, but it's spoiled by inconsistency. It should either present itself in a bureaucratic style, or should rant at bureaucracy, but not both --Goomball 07:40, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete - This section wasn't funny at the beginning, and got less so. Really, people. Gartogg 12:49, 9 May 2005 (JDT)

Keep I liked it and it's associated pages, perhaps because I work in such a bureaucracy --Elvis 06:31, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep/Needs more substance - It has a touch of Douglas Adams to it. --Repairman Jack 09:39, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep Not that looking at the edit history would indicate my opinion or anything...;) I'm confused about Goomball's inconsistency comment - it's pretty consistent from my point of view - a near endless loop of useless bureaucracy. I agree it needs work, but it's at least titled correctly... --Famine 17:41, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep There's FAR worse crap. --Chronarion 18:56, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep It can be improved. --bdanials 02:15, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep Even though this kind of "click all over the goddamn place" entry annoys the hell out of me, that's what gives this particular one its humor. --Uvula Donor 09:45, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep --Rcmurphy 00:27, 12 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep If anything, it needs even more associated pages. There's not much bureaucracy to tunnel through, IMHO. --Orborde 00:38, 16 May 2005 (EDT)


Combined half of Hacker and Hackers articles, deleted unfunny bits, redirected both to Hacker.

Delete - Dull. --Goomball 07:40, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete - This page really sucks. Gartogg 13:26, 8 May 2005 (JDT)

Keep/Expand - I really liked that little bit about gross generals. Sheep 09:04, 8 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete--Repairman Jack 09:49, 8 May 2005 (EDT)

Hack it to pieces / Delete --bdanials 03:39, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Please do. --Rcmurphy 02:32, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Uvula Donor 09:46, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep I like bits of it, such as the point starting w/ "Hackers are people who break in to computer banks." I find the article "Hacker" to be distinctly unfunny, however, so maybe a Move or Merge is in order. --Orborde 02:11, 16 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite Number 2 should be in an article about crackers, which is typically what people are talking about when they say "hacker." --Evice 13:50, 21 May 2005 (EDT)

Homer Simpson.

Note the period in the name. This page is orphaned and stupid. Ahmed the Jewess 01:38, 7 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete - The non period page isn't much better. --Chronarion 01:52, 7 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete both. --Repairman Jack 07:20, 7 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete both. --Cap'n Ben 10:13, 7 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete both. --Elvis 09:28, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Homer Simpson (the non-period page) has been completely rewritten. --Uvula Donor 11:49, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

And is now acceptable, nice work UD--slack 19:50, 10 May 2005 (EDT)



I find it overly abusive. I also don't like (TalkContribs (del)Block (rem-lst-all)WhoisCityProxy?WP Edits)'s changes to Adolph Hitler. --Repairman Jack 11:59, 6 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete offensive in bits is ok, but this is too much. Plus its just not funny. --Paulgb Talk 16:12, 6 May 2005 (EDT)

Just needs a rewrite. I'm trying to think of something to do with the movie. --Nyxx 16:56, 6 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete The only line I like is the "Independance[sic] Day" one.

  • The Independence Day stuff has been moved to a new article along with the rest of the Neon jokes. --Carlb 13:09, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete It's rubbish. slap! It's garbage. slap! It's rubbish. slap! It's garbage. slap! It's rubbish and it's garbage! --Cap'n Ben 10:12, 7 May 2005 (EDT)

I've done a complete rewrite, keeping nothing of the original beyond the first one word. Recheck this one??? --Carlb 12:37, 7 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep the rewrite Nice job, Carlb. --Uvula Donor 09:48, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep-- 04:24, 8 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep It's a good article now. It'll stay good. It promises. --Goomball 07:41, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep - A lot better. --Repairman Jack 09:39, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep the dream alive. --Rcmurphy 00:27, 12 May 2005 (EDT)

Pimp Daddy Welfare

Deleted --Uvula Donor 10:52, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

I might be missing somthing, but what I get from the article and external link is this: Pimp daddy welfare is a real person, but his music is meant to be funny. He is not famous enough that I have heard of him, nor could I find a reference to him at wikipedia. I do like the line

His early childhood of drugs, alcohol, and elmo would corrupt any impressionable mind and make them evil. Pimp D. was no exception.

But thats the only thing I found funny. The song titles appear to be actual song titles. This page also seems to have some inside jokes, which is bad. --Paulgb Talk 15:23, 1 May 2005 (EDT)

(On second look, that sentance isnt even funny because the elmo jokes aren't original either) --Paulgb Talk 10:43, 7 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Just not funny. --Uvula Donor 08:41, 4 May 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite It isn't very uncyclopaedic, but I feel it's just enough for someone to turn into a good article. --EvilZak 08:04, 6 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete This evidently real rapper gets 534 hits on Google. He's basically not worth an article in general, and I don't think the humor in this attempt justifies its existence either.

Lord Zarquon

Note: Some whacky anon (, cpe-70-112-85-159.austin.res.rr.com; now blocked for 24 days from the deletion) wiped this listing from VFD and no-one caught it. I noticed this POS was still there, so I'm restoring the discussion as it was. (I'd zap it right now myself if I hadn't nominated it.) - David Gerard 19:15, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Douglas Adams quoting is the new Monty Python quoting. Same for quoting and riffing - it would have no value without the original. Is this recoverable? - David Gerard 20:25, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Uvula Donor 21:21, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Machinecurse 21:56, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Famine 22:00, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Cthulhu and Cthulu

Leave alone. I did some mucking about with it. --Abbot Vesuvius updated 2:14 08 May AD 2005 (EDT)

Leave alone (Changed Vote) --Elvis 04:06, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Merge I fired up a google fight on the two, and it seems that Cthulhu is the "winner" in terms of popularity. Cthulhu has promise and is properly stubbed. Cthulu needs to die. I vote to replace Cthulu with a redirect to Cthulhu. --Famine 21:35, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

I also tweaked the Cthulhu page a bit, because I liked the squid so much. Sorry about that. I haven't had calimari for a long time now... --Famine 21:57, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Leave alone I happen to think Cthulu is the funnier of the two, but have no real grudge against Cthulhu. Are we only allowed to have one joke version for each real meme? --Menace3society 00:21, 30 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep both. Two in jokes is fine in this case, since nobody knows how to spell it anyway. --Chronarion 13:58, 8 May 2005 (EDT)

Pae Do and Paedophile

I'm bothered about these articles. (a) because it's difficult (but not impossible) to make the subject amusing, and (b) because of the legal risk of listing people's names under 'famous paedophiles'. Overall they aren't tremendously funny, just a play on words. --Goomball 07:43, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep Bear in mind that of the famouse peadophiles, 1 is a convicted child pornographer and the other two are fictional........--Elvis 07:54, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Can a paedophile be described as 'famous'? Infamous, surely.

Borderline - the red links in particular need to go - David Gerard 09:09, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

undecided How about getting the author's, Pantsonhead, opinion as this is getting into the issue of censorship. --Repairman Jack 09:53, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

The two "redlinks" Paedofinder-General and Nonce Sense I added are actualy references that I don't expect americans to get (and only a fairly small proportion of UK'ers) given time I can fill them out.--Elvis 14:25, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep --Abbot Vesuvius 15:03 28 Apr A.D. 1503 (EDT)

Merge I don't believe there's a terrible legal risk for satire, as long as we're not randomly calling anyone and everyone a pedophile. Hell, we featured an article about assassinating the president and didn't get in any trouble, and I believe that was a lot more "risky" than this. However, two pages for this joke is one page too many, in my opinion. --EvilZak 19:04, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep -- 03:41, 3 May 2005 (EDT)

Drop. Not on grounds of taste, just not very funny, even if you recognise the Paedofinder-General and Nonce Sense references. --Commander Jameson 08:49, 8 May 2005 (EDT)


Not Redeemed. Just Kept. --Uvula Donor 10:55, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

Started okay, but is being hijacked by Romanian trolls. That in itself sounds funny, but the result is bolox. Needs a delete or complete re-write. --Goomball 07:35, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Uh oh, someone needs timeout as the page is disappearing right now. Maybe they decided to rewrite the whole article. --Repairman Jack 09:58, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

The little Romanians are getting terribly restless. The last edit I reverted was along the lines of 'Romania is a European country' with a link to some facts about the place. All very nice, but I think they've missed the point of Uncyclopedia. From the page edit history I've traced 14 unique IP addresses from various locations in Romania. They must have some kind of club going on. --Goomball 10:37, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep Currently, it's ok. Not great, but not anywhere near the worst page I've seen here. Just needs some TLC. --Famine 16:25, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep Famine is right, it's not the worst page here. It's giving the Romanian trolls a sandbox to play in. When the novelty wears off, we can go in and mop up if it needs it. --Uvula Donor 18:18, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Gunpei Yokoi

Deleted. --Uvula Donor 09:30, 10 May 2005 (EDT)

From QuickVFD.

Delete --Rcmurphy 01:46, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete -- 02:53, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Goomball 07:33, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Stub and Keep The name itself could work for all kinds of puns. Right now, it's just a little sad. 20 minutes of hammering at the keyboard, and it could be a definite keeper. Not that I have that time right now, but that's what the stub is for. --Famine 16:28, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --EvilZak 19:04, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

What is a Gunpei Yokoi? --Nytrospawn 22:08, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

David the Lastnameless

From QuickVFD.

Delete --Rcmurphy 01:46, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete--bdanials 02:52, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Goomball 07:33, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep/expand I think the premise of "No last name=famous" is kind humourous, by far not the unfunniest page I've seen. Can be expanded, added to--slack 11:23, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Stub & Keep It has plenty of promise. I mean, Jesus is the most famous "lastnameless" guy, followed shortly by Mohammed, Cher, and Elmo. Hell, we could even have a Category:Lastnameless for all the famous people lacking last names. Especially all the Tonys. --Famine 16:38, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite or Delete The concept of someone being nicknamed "The Lastnameless" is actually pretty good, but the article as it stands is too incoherent to survive without a rewrite. --EvilZak 19:04, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Tweaked I tweaked the Lastnameless page, and created Category:Lastnameless. My appologies about being so reckless with my edits - I forgot both checking minor edits and making summary notations while adding the category to pages. Regardless, I think this has a little bit more of a place now, although I kept it stubbed in hopes of a bit more editing from the masses. Will you let it live a wee bit longer now? --Famine 22:41, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep The article still needs some editing, but I like the concept. --Uvula Donor 08:35, 4 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep I nullified my last vote after reading the new(er) and improved article... Definately has a lot of promise --bdanials 14:58, 6 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep Kind of pointless, but fun and mostly well-written.Ahmed the Jewess 01:56, 7 May 2005 (EDT)


Burninated. --Chronarion 13:55, 8 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete-- 04:24, 8 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete--Repairman Jack 09:49, 8 May 2005 (EDT)

Encyclopaedia Brittanica


Not realy funny especialy as it's been American since 1941 (which I thought was ancient history to the (presumably) American author :-) dammn now I'm at it)...., But hey maybe I'm being overly sensative.--Elvis 12:25, 3 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Repairman Jack 13:40, 3 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete And he forgot that British people have bad teeth, and use the letter U too much, as in "I sauy, whaut is yuour favourite colour?" But seriously this article sucked--slack 13:52, 3 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete and impale author on a spike atop the House of Lords.--Machinecurse 20:20, 3 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --AshyRaccoon 02:09, 4 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Please draw and quarter the author, if possible. --bdanials 05:58, 4 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Utter crap. --Uvula Donor 08:35, 4 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Unfortunately there are block-compressing fairies protecting the page at the moment or else I would press the button myself. --Rcmurphy 00:32, 6 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Its craptastic crapity crap, and nothing more. -- 05:33, 6 May 2005 (EDT)

I like it. --Nyxx 16:56, 6 May 2005 (EDT)

Encyclopaedia Brittanica has been rewritten in its entirety... evidently some of us have far too much time on our hands. :) --Carlb 14:28, 7 May 2005 (EDT)

Keep-- 04:24, 8 May 2005 (EDT)


Redirected. --Uvula Donor 08:36, 4 May 2005 (EDT)

Here we go again. We already have Augusto Pinochet as an article, and the joke they're doing with this is already covered in the existing article. Welcome back to the VFD, Pinochet!

Delete/Merge with Augusto Pinochet --RadicalX 23:29, 2 May 2005 (EDT)

Redirect --EvilZak 23:34, 2 May 2005 (EDT)

It has already been redirected. --Repairman Jack 13:44, 3 May 2005 (EDT)

Being and Nothingness

Edited and kept.--Uvula Donor 08:28, 4 May 2005 (EDT)

Incoherent (in a bad way), pointless cursing (again, in a bad way). --Jebus 14:57, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Cry uncle, and let slip the dogs of surrender. I retract my recommendation. --Jebus 21:52, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep Like the same author's other philosophy-related articles, part of the humor here derives from the dissonance between the subject matter and the language he uses to describe it. I agree that his writing style gets old fast, but I think there's room here for some of his articles. Being and Nothingness could use a touch of Wikification, though. --Uvula Donor 18:09, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep Could use a little reformatting to improve readability.-- 21:18, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep The author seems to have actually read Sartre, even if he keeps talkin' shit about him. -- Abbot Vesuvius 9:33 PM non-military time, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)

I edited it. Abbot Vesuvius 2:24, 27 Apr 005 (EDT)

Good job! --Uvula Donor 07:59, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep Haha. Well done. --Rcmurphy 02:32, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)

A Keeper Nice rewrite! --Repairman Jack



Yet another Terri Schiavo article... Still not funny, nor IMHO is there hope of it ever being funny. -- 02:27, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep This is obviously not a candidate for deletion. --EvilZak 02:40, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep It's amusing, topical, and not entirely offensive. Satire my friends, satire. --Gadgeophile 03:25, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep I liked it personaly, it is nowhere near as bad as some pages (like most of mine for instance :-)) --Elvis 05:56, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep Unlike the past few Terri Schiavo articles, this one is funny, sick, and and the "vegetative state" pic just cracked me up. --Uvula Donor 08:13, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep I like it. Abbat Vesuvius 10:55 AM, 26 Apr 2005

Delete That's right, I like to be different. Actually I just don't find it funny. --Rcmurphy 02:35, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Terri Schiavo could be funny... but not in this way. -- 17:01, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep. Oh yes she is. - David Gerard 18:38, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep We must Nevar Forget the death of this hilarious, soulless meatbag. -Kefkanigma 1:04 PM, 30 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep The picture alone is priceless, I can't say I appreciate the digs at Catholics, which BTW is getting rather old...find a new target people!, but it was mildly comical--slack 20:00, 3 May 2005 (EDT)


Delete/Rewrite --Uvula Donor

Keep/expand slightly amusing actually --stillwaters/Talk 20:19, 18 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep This is not that bad. --Chronarion 23:38, 18 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite Not "that bad" WORSE! It makes no sense, I would prefer a rewrite, something that actually lampoons the "let's sell our product during a commercial break in a cartoon which is basically a 30-min commercial" that would be funny, or maybe I'm too much of a Joe fan --slack 13:20, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Can do better, Rewrite --Repairman Jack 10:55, 22 Apr 2005 (EDT)

REWROTED Hmmm better, decided to run with my 30 year relationship..eww, sounds gay....love affiar...gayer...appreciation, better, of all things Joe. If ya don't like it, delete it, but at least now it follows the Joe we know--slack 19:20, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Damn, slack, that stream-of-consciousness-toy-ubergeek shit rocks. It's a keeper now. --Uvula Donor 08:23, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)


From QuickVFD.

Meh --Algorithm 16:21, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Merge with Color. --Uvula Donor 18:35, 18 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite, and Replace color as the main article, yah --stillwaters/Talk 20:17, 18 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep Surely keep this as the main article and merge color into this. --Elvis 08:15, 19 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete and don't merge I actually asked for this to be spared from QuickVFD, but it's not funny now that it's no longer an infinite loop. I suppose it's not as funny to Americans, but for those taught the other way, it's a lot more amusing. I'd rather this be deleted completely, so that someone can write a separate article on Colour later.-- 12:06, 19 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete I spell colour and honour that way and still don't find it funny. --Repairman Jack

Merged with a newly-expanded Color. --Uvula Donor 09:01, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)


Kept --Uvula Donor 08:07, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete--Uvula Donor 13:27, 21 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep Reminds me of Vincent Price's Character "Egghead" on the old Batman TV series... ah Vince, you left us too soon--slack 13:49, 21 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep Eh, it's not utterly unamusing. --Rcmurphy 01:54, 22 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep --Goomball 08:35, 22 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Not enough yokes. --Repairman Jack 10:45, 22 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep --Elvis 10:17, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep It has its own unique brand of humor. A refreshing change from the ordineggy. --Famine 17:14, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep I like awful puns. --EvilZak 02:40, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Silverie Hawn

Kept --Uvula Donor 08:14, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Nytrospawn 14:51, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep Vote changed. Yeah, was the pic. --Chronarion 19:10, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep, but... The basic concept of "lesser Hawns" is pretty good. Is it the pic that you're objecting to? Because, uh, I uploaded that for one of the April anniversary pages (a pic for National Obesity Day.) What if I dump the pic, find something else to illustrate the April anniversary, and put something else in the Hawn article? --Uvula Donor 22:13, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep I thought it was funny when I wrote it. Apologies for stealing Uvula's picture. --Abbot Vesuvius 22:46 PM 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Yeah, drop the pic. I vomitted in my mouth a little when I saw that --Nytrospawn 00:14, 22 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Pic changed. --Abbot Vesuvius 1:48 AM 22 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep with new pic, which actually goes with the article nicely. Mind you, Goldie Hawn is eminently deletable itself - David Gerard 03:51, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Kate Moss

From Quick VFD.

Kept, but stubbed --Uvula Donor 08:20, 26 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Rcmurphy 21:45, 19 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep It's got some promise. It's stubbed. Let someone run with it. I mean, "anorexic bogs" is pretty damn cleaver. --Famine 09:11, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewritten I got overly ambitious and rewrote the whole article in the style of a biological text on mosses. It's got some good parts, but on the whole it reads like...a text on mosses. I kept it stubbed in the hopes someone else can inject some additional humor into it. --Famine 23:12, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep/Rewrite/Expand - There's a good article lurking in there. Somewhere. I think. --Uvula Donor 09:31, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep / Modify With some love and care, this can grow into one hellova article -- 15:28, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep / Modify --Repairman Jack 10:50, 22 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Justin Timberlake

From Quick VFD.

Rewrite --Rcmurphy 19:04, 16 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep/expand --stillwaters/Talk 20:13, 18 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep / expand The pun is funny. --Repairman Jack 11:00, 22 Apr 2005 (EDT)



Delete --EvilZak 23:39, 24 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete We need a democrat article. Just not this one. --Chronarion 03:05, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Rcmurphy 04:01, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Dull, Dull, dull, dull, dull --Elvis 10:18, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete harshed my mellow -- Jebus 21:50, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Dwigh D Eisenhower

Retained due to popular demand.

Delete--Nytrospawn 17:57, 24 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete--Algorithm 18:20, 24 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Rcmurphy 18:33, 24 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Elvis 10:17, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Is this another example of spelling errors on-purpose? --Repairman Jack 10:40, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Send it to /dev/null -- 13:02, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Kill it before it spreads Pointless, misspelled stubby and pointless, oh already said that--slack 17:18, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)

MC Hammer

Resolved. --Uvula Donor 09:14, 21 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Not really a vote for deletion; I just want to know how everyone likes the newest version. I don't want to pile on Famine. I'm just not sure I really like the revisions but I don't want to just go in and revert it. --Uvula Donor 09:41, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

revert - I think the joke suffered when it lost the layout of a real 403 error page. --Machinecurse 18:30, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Revert I don't dislike the lyrics, but I think the earlier, simpler page is better. --Rcmurphy 18:47, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

I reverted, but forked. --Chronarion 19:07, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Good call Chronarion. The lyrics were decent, but I was about 50/50 on whether it ruined the page or not. My only remaining gripe is that a 403 is "forbidden", and while more in line with "you can't touch this", that's currently at odds with the text on the page. (The page you are looking for is currently unavailable.) I guess my vote now is for someone to find an "authoritive" 403 page to hack some more appropriate text from. --Famine 22:19, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)


From Quick VFD.

Shuffled off the mortal COIL!

Delete That's right, even a picture won't save you every time. --Rcmurphy 21:45, 19 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Especially a badly-exposed picture. Delete. --Uvula Donor 09:32, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Kill It A blank slate for someone else to work on is required here. --Famine 09:13, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

make it walk the plank Arrr... I see an unfunny article here. -- 13:28, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Like the sauce, hate the page, Delete --Repairman Jack 10:54, 22 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Tree Fiddy

Delete It's a one line, bad grammar and spelling repeat of a South Park joke. I'm all for inserting clever "borrowed" jokes from TV, etc, but this is hardly pageworthy IMO. --MitchO 12:10, 19 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Deleted Not worthy of VFD, you can use QuickVFD for things like this. --Paulgb Talk 14:34, 19 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Misspelling / Mispelling

Kept --Uvula Donor 10:00, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

From QuickVFD.

Keep --Algorithm 15:14, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Keep --Farside 19:34, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Keep --Uvula Donor Keep --Chronarion 23:39, 18 Apr 2005 (EDT)

List of United States Pharaohs

Kept the list. Merged the content of the United States Vice Pharaoh page with the United States Pharaoh page and turned "vice pharaoh" into a redirect. --Uvula Donor 09:59, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)

delete Since we already have a list of US Presidents with appropriate links, is this article necessary? --Uvula Donor 06:30, 16 Apr 2005 (EDT) Keep I have no idea. It appears to be in context, and not too bad. --Chronarion 14:26, 16 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Perhaps it should be merged with United States Pharaoh. --EvilZak 14:01, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Oh, man! Keep! Or merge. Yeah, probably merge. --Abbot Vesuvius 10:05, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Merge --Darkdan 22:13, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep or merge - David Gerard 16:33, 18 Apr 2005 (EDT)



From QuickVFD.

Rewrite/Stub --Algorithm 17:38, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Eh. I don't find the "sanity/sanitary" joke amusing. --Rcmurphy 17:57, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Uvula Donor 20:39, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Book Of List Entries


People Who Need an Asskicking
Indisputable Badasses

These are two that have a bunch of edits. I caught and deleted "Best movies ever" and "Worst movies ever", but I didn't get these in time. I say Delete - what do y'all say? --Uvula Donor 15:42, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep. I think they're funny. 15:48, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

AWWW that sucks Ulva, turn out you're a jackass lacking a sense of humor. --Whatdaherr 17:25, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Please, don't start THAT list. --Chronarion 14:27, 16 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Implying that George W. Bush needs an ass kicking or that Maddox is a badass? HOLY SHIT YOU GUYS ARE CLEVER! --EvilZak 17:36, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep. I think they can be expanded on, or rewritten. Maybe reasons given why one is a badass or needs their butt kicked? Orion Blastar 18:02, 15 Apr 2005 (CST)

Delete Indisputable Badasses has a good number of, well, indisputable badasses. I mean, if it was filled with the likes of Polly Shore, Yoni, RuPal, David Spade, and Barney, it'd be going somewhere. Make it die. --Famine 20:27, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Rcmurphy 01:12, 20 Apr 2005 (EDT)


Mutilated. --Chronarion 23:40, 18 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete This sudden increase in horribly unfunny LUE/GameFAQs pages is starting to piss me off. --EvilZak 14:01, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Wow, what a piece. --Rcmurphy 14:04, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete I am really tired of these "stream of unconciousness" pieces. They are cluttering up the site and serve no useful purpose.--slack 14:27, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Please! It's not even good stream of consciousness gibberish!--- HoosierDaddy

Delete And I second what EvilZak said. --Uvula Donor 18:28, 18 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Torr Cyborg Takeover of 2027

Deleted --Uvula Donor 17:34, 19 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Don't find it funny-- 03:55, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Uvula Donor 13:17, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete "If I mention lots of buzzwords like 'Oprah' and 'Bill Gates,' the article is automagically funny!" --Rcmurphy 14:30, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete short and unfunny --stillwaters/Talk 20:14, 18 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Merge with Clinja?

Only if it's changed to the Clinja Cyborg Takeover. Even then, I don't think it's really salvageable. I do like the idea of clinja cyborgs. -- Abbot Vesuvius 12:23, 19Apr005 (EDT)

Might want to take that Torr reference out of clinja, actually. And any other articles that link to this.-- 05:04, 19 Apr 2005 (EDT)

About half the infinate loop pages

seriously what the hell (unsigned by User:Sheep)

Post some up here or to QuickVFD and we will crush them --Paulgb Talk 13:56, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Keep I find some of those funny, some are actually real jokes --Farside

Some of them are, when it fits with the subject. For example, endless loop. But a lot of other pages are just the same joke over again. And then theres the pages that are just random loops out of nowhere, I cant think of any examples though because they don't last long. --Paulgb Talk 21:06, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

This shouldn't be here anymore since I threw some of the really shitty ones on QVFD. Sheep 19:38, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Why do all the evil people in Star Wars have a British accent

Kept --Uvula Donor 18:13, 19 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Terribly retarded. --tanjo 1:00, 16 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep Retarded, but funny. Only British Star Wars fans without a sense of humor wouldn't like it. --Parallax Rebel 14:00, 16 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep If this is the worst of the retardation, i'm sorry, but you need to hit 'random page' more often. --Chronarion 14:25, 16 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep It answers the age old question (as stated in the title) --Nytrospawn 20:11, 16 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep --Uvula Donor 13:13, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep Although it should be noted that it should be "Why do all the evil people in all holywood films have a British accent". --Elvis 12:16, 18 Apr 2005 (EDT)

PlayStation 2

Keep Can be repaired through wiki process. --Chronarion 14:29, 16 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Someone deleted the old "PS2" article (which was going to be dumped anyway) and redirected to PlayStation 2. Trouble is, the new article reads like an editorial, not a humor piece. --Uvula Donor 09:43, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete I agree. Not amusing in the least. --Famine 16:08, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Rcmurphy 20:31, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep I think it's at least moderatley funny, Needs some tweaking but the concept is good.--slack 14:35, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

slack, you wanna take a shot at it? --Uvula Donor 18:31, 18 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Harry Pothead and the Sorcerer's Stoned

Deleted --Uvula Donor 13:10, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Algorithm 19:37, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Rcmurphy 19:41, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Check the history -- its been requested rewrite, blanked, rewritten, now vfd. Its time for this page to die. Actually, I kinda like the original version, but I doubt anyone will agree with me, and its not really encyclopedia material, so my vote stays. --Paulgb Talk 20:27, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)

delete and remove original link --Machinecurse 22:21, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Revert to Original I thought that initial instantiation was amusing. --PantsMacKenzie 01:11, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Revert--Abc 01:29, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Revert to the original post And if Tanjo touches it again, give him a couple of days off for vandalism. Seriously, blanking it and leaving insults about the original poster is bad form. I agree with Paulgb - I thought the original was pretty funny (I have a soft spot for fart jokes and drug humor). --Uvula Donor 09:36, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Revert Makeing a personal attack doesnt help when decideing to revert something you did --Nytrospawn 12:22, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Pretty hopeless page, even the initial one. --Chronarion 14:31, 16 Apr 2005 (EDT)

I burning your dog

Kept - Lame but harmless I guess. Saved by it's status as in-joke to the Flamewar guidelines. Every good website needs an in-joke or two. --Uvula Donor 13:07, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Undeleted, it's an injoke of the Flamewar guidelines. Context is the instructions on the page regarding timmy is stupid. At least allow additional vote time. --Chronarion 01:38, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Pantsonhead 10:51, 13 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Nytrospawn 12:09, 13 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete I never understood tha funny of this phrase. --Rcmurphy 12:41, 13 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete It's an "in joke" on the SDMB, and as such doesn't really belong here. --Uvula Donor 13:32, 13 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Note: This page has been deleted. Its contents were:

An ancient Chinese proverb meaning 'Timmy is stupid'.

Restore I thought it was funny, given the context. --Algorithm 00:37, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Not really much in the way of context. I still have no idea what it means, Im pretty sure most of our users think the same--Nytrospawn 00:44, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Even with the context, I still think it's lame. Chrono's Da Man, though, and I'll defer to whatever decision he makes, even if I don't agree with it. --Uvula Donor 10:00, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep. --Chronarion 01:39, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)


Redirected for the dozens of people who forget that darn last period.

I'm pretty sure this is worthless, but I want to make sure I'm not missing something important before deleting it. --Rcmurphy 23:20, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Only two google results, one of which is Making up Oscar Wilde quotes. --EvilZak 23:47, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete and/or redirect to M.T.I.A.F.A.P.G.S.T.Y.A.T.H.O.R.I.Y.T. --Algorithm 01:38, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Someone set it up the bomb Main screen turn on: its dumb! --bdanials 03:48, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Neither of 'em are funny. Might as well get ridda the worst of the two. --Uvula Donor 09:29, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Its not funny. Keep M.T.I.A.F.A.P.G.S.T.Y.A.T.H.O.R.I.Y.T. though... its funny is an odd way. -- 15:08, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete and/or redirect The Wilde one makes me smile. This one is just dumb.--Famine 16:07, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Lilith Fair

Rewritten Better than it was; not as good as it could be.  :D Thanks again, Famine --Uvula Donor 09:49, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite or delete The Lilith Fair - like most other "rock fests" just so deserves to be made fun of. Anyone wanna take a shot at a rewrite? (I'd love to see what kind of stream-of-consciousness insanity JHarr could come up with.) --Uvula Donor 13:25, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrote(ish) I consumed some early-afternoon vodka and rewrote this. It's far from my best work, but I think it has potential. Tho, after reading my crap, I might still vote to delete it. Someone with skills needs to help me out with this. It's barren and sad, and the puns are awful... Still, it's a bit better.

--Famine 17:13, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)


Page redeemed. Sorta. Thanks, Famine --Uvula Donor 09:38, 15 Apr 2005 (EDT)

rewrite --Uvula Donor 10:10, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite --Rcmurphy 13:30, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite/Stub, its not bad but it could be so much better --Paulgb Talk 14:29, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Bettered I took a stab at it. It still needs work, so I can only hope I inspired someone else to greatness. Please help this poor, starving article. --Famine 17:37, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)


Don't really get it. In any case, Angels is better.

I agree. I'll take the initiative and redirect Angel to Angels. --Rcmurphy 12:39, 13 Apr 2005 (EDT)


Delete, nothing here improves on a red link - David Gerard 20:47, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Agreed. --Rcmurphy 20:49, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Uvula Donor 21:18, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

King of the Internet

Rewrite This one was deleted, but I restored it because the concept of some lonely, unknown nerd named Bob ruling the internet from his desk tickles me. As is, it's nothing, but the idea itself is amusing...and besides, if it's deleted then what are the chances someone will make a similar page? Still, if I'm in the minority, feel free to delete again. --Rcmurphy 20:20, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

I'll see what I can come up with - David Gerard 20:25, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

How's the rewrite? - David Gerard 20:36, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

I like it. --Uvula Donor 20:39, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Yep, keep. Thanks David Gerard. --Rcmurphy 02:54, 13 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Catholic Church

Deleted. --Uvula Donor 09:47, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)

delete/rewrite Not funny as is. --Uvula Donor 10:04, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete/Rewrite --Nytrospawn 13:58, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

delete/rewrite --stillwaters/Talk 14:35, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

delete I've actually used the "Dan Brown Code" joke myself on many an occasion, and nobody thought it funny. Why should this loser get away with it? --Machinecurse 21:54, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Rcmurphy 02:57, 13 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Personal tools