This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFD.
No way is this getting deleted. •Spang•☃•talk• 05:43, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I don't find it funny myself, but as I said when voting against it for VFH, I can see it would be some people's kettle of doody. TheMono 06:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
This got VFH'd? I was kidding, I tell you! (Keep anyway) >Major Sir Hinoa|Talk|KUN▋ 06:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep, I say... And while we're at it, restore the bation of glory that was Duel Masters. That was fuckin' classic. (And was simultaneously ran on both VFH and VFD, thanks to yours truly) TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 17:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
For great justice! --Spin 20:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I didn't vote for it, (actually, yes I did) Keep keep keep!! --SonicChaoBabbel!Contribs 18:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep! Must keep! ~ Chaote 20:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep. Worth a few chuckles. A few. --ZombieJeff 00:21, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Please KILL this. If this is the kind of thing Uncyclopedia's humor is coming to...its a dark future. This isnt even slightly funny in any way, shape, or form. DESTROY IT!!! --Sir Cornbread 04:29, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Just like shit cannon. I'm having deja-poo. See, it's not funny...Modusoperandi 04:50, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Call in OJ to murder it Wow. Horrible. It would be better if this weren't a rip off of Robert Hamburger. --emc! ╬ 05:29, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Send it to hell. Let me dispense with formalities: This article sucks. --SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 03:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
You guys are all freaking me out here - it almost reminds me of those mobs of angry villagers from 1930's horror movies. Nobody's going to cry if this doesn't get featured, but why delete it? It has "cult" appeal. Either way, it's not really doing any harm, and if you think about it, articles like this help prevent everything else on the site from looking all... samey. It's just one article, and surely there's a place for the "so bad it's good" aesthetic here, isn't there? Anyway, I can easily see this turning into another Talk:Euroipods, so... please? c • > •cunwapquc? 05:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Its just REALLY bad... and the way its going..let the flamewar begin. --Sir Cornbread 05:36, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Completely infantile article. "It's not doing any harm"? You act like this article is a nest of honeybees. First of all, only two real articles link to it, and second of all, the original author was evidently completely unaware of article guidelines on Uncyclopedia, which may prove why this article blows. --emc! ╬ 05:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Precisely, the submitter's only contrib is this article, and hes been M.I.A. since April 18. I might have found this funny when I was 5 years old, but not now. And please, Sikon, HUFF IT, cuz you have that authority. --Sir Cornbread 07:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I will restore it if it gets huffed. >Major Sir Hinoa|Talk|KUN▋ 07:07, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Its not so much that I care if its on the site, so long as its in a dark hidden corner, but this CANNOT EVER be a featured article. --Sir Cornbread 07:09, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Sure, by all means boot it off of VFH as soon as possible. Hopefully nobody's trying to be unreasonable here... But EMC, of course it's infantile - that's the whole point! And what do honeybees have to do with anything? All I'm saying is that it's not hateful, it's not an attack on anyone or anything, and it's not even overtly obscene (unless you actually read it, of course). It's just demented, and that's why some of us are going to like it, and some of us aren't. Hey, some of us are just demented. Surely there's no need to get all flamey about it, is there? c • > •cunwapquc? 07:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
But half the fun of the interweb is getting all flamey! My point is that this article about shit is taking up valuable space that could be occupied by something, um, that's not about shit. Just you wait, one day you'll write the most bestest page ever™ and when you go to save, the interweb will give you whatever error it gives when it's full. Then you'll cry because you will remember the time that you, literally, fought for shit. Don't make me end this discussion by saying that Hitler would have wanted to keep it? Dang, I just did. Pesky Hitler... Modusoperandi 08:43, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Hitler was demented too, wasn't he? Besides, I'm not literally fighting for this article, nor shit in general - I'm just posting written responses to a public interweb site in support of (sh)it. Think of it this way - without shit, where would we be? Everything we ate would just stay right there in our colons, would it not? Surely, each of us would soon weigh many, many thousands of pounds as a result, and the risk of various colo-rectal ailments would increase immeasurably, perhaps even exponentially. Is this really what you want? Is this the kind of world you wish to live in? For shame, I say - I, Some user, wish to live in a world where human beings are free to relieve themselves of solid waste, at appropriate times and places, without fear of shame or retribution. In short, a glorious world of shit!Who's with me? Together we can overcome the forces of anal-retention and take back our sphincters! GOD BLAST AMERICA! c • > •cunwapquc? 05:13, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Just for the record, in response to Modusoperandi's latest comment... If this article, or any other article for that matter, is ever deleted, it will still be on the uncyclopedia servers, as will it's entire history and deletion log. In fact, one could argue, because of the deletion log being there, and in Special:Log/delete, the article would actually take up more space on our servers deleted then it would in it's current state. t o m p k i n s blah.ﺞوﻦוףהՃՄண்ஸފއހวอฏม+տtrade websites 05:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Still, those "Sorry, Internet Full" errors can be rather emotionally scarring. c • > •cunwapquc? 06:27, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Besides, even if it ends up taking up more space when huffed, that space will be filled with our victory over the forces of shit, rather than just shit. Onward, to victory! Modusoperandi 19:56, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Well, it appears we're still divided on this...everyone on the keep side should just give in... Sir CHolla | CUN 04:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Holy..... This had to be the longest discussion ever...I didn't know my VFH of it would lead to an explosion on VFD... --SonicChaoBabbel!Contribs 20:04, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
All right, with a net score of 6 to keep and having been on VFD forever, I'm ruling this one a keeper. You don't have to like it, but it's staying. —RT. HON.HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 19:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Okay, as long as you promise to feed it, brush it's fur, and play with it everyday. Remember what happened to the goldfish that we got for you...Modusoperandi 19:35, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
It's vanity, Its ridiculously long, and there is really no reason to Delete it. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 17:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep. But a very good editor needs to grab an editing chainsaw and get to work.--Cray Z. 02:50, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep. TD is right. Please read UN:VAIN.--Jtaylor1 20:12, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
It has reached the point of being a parody of itself and its kind. We keep this one around so that we can have an excuse to summarily delete all the other ones like it. --Spin 23:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
This is a labour of love for someone who isn't me to enjoy. -- Imrealized 07:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm very easily amused yet I didn't laugh. --George VI 07:22, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I skimmed over this, so I may have missed the paragraph that has an actual joke. Considering how much pointless shit there is to wade through, though, I doubt that joke makes up for this travesty. --EvilZak 07:36, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
EX-TER-MI-NATE this quasi-fanboy, vanity-esque tumor-run-amok-through-a-failing-immune-system "article." Its presence has always irked me. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
It's not really vain, it's a parody on popular culture with a very widespread fan base. We wouldn't even be discussing this if it wasn't a play on anime. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by-Hyperion- (talk • contribs)
Keep-o, considering the article is only four months old and there haven't been a lot of edits; perhaps it should just be categorized better and suggested in the Pee Review. --emc! ╬ 05:27, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Upgrade to level 2. There's still hope for this one yet. User:DandyDanD 20:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Burn it. The article should be about either: a)the life of professional studio audience members or b)placing cute-sounding, politically correct jargon on gonorrhoea or c)something other than what it is. -- Imrealized 08:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep It's not great. In fact, it sucks, but with some work from a professional and not a moron, it might survive. --emc! ╬ 05:36, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
And while we're looking at Canambodia... This is another literary miscarriage-in-progress we should expedite to the big abortion clinic in the sky. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 23:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Some Merit It has some merit, but I do see why it should be deleted. It's been around for almost a year now, and is still a piece of crap. I would say that the William Shatner article, is actually, worse, than, this. --emc! ╬ 03:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Baleet. We don't already have an article on Cambodia? Why not just write there? If anything, we could merge the two, neither of them are that good. --Emo tear </3 (Karn). 21:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
*This article is stupid and it looks like an advertisement. --Sbluen 23:54, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Kill it immediately. Horrible, absolutely horrible. It's like trying to watch two retards have sex. --emc! ╬ 00:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
NRV'd - it was only a few hours old. Makes me want to VFD Sbluen for not checking the edit history. SirFamine,Gun♣Petition» 02:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry. I didn't read deletion policy carfully enough. I should have tagged it with {{vanity3}} instead of {{vfd}} before I nominated it. Still, this article is very bad and the author isn't likely to improve it because he didn't bother to read HTBFANJS. --Sbluen 02:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Uh-oh pasghetty-o's. Honest mistake...but I feel like such a tool for not checking the history. Somebody shoot me. --emc! ╬ 03:51, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Gives the RI people somewhere to dump their trash, so it doesn't clutter the rest of the site. Last I checked, (it blinded me) it was still within the vanity policies. SirFamine,Gun♣Petition» 02:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Might as well vote to keep it. --ZombieJeff 02:04, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Just merge this into Vandalism/example. Then, that page should be archived because it's way too big. --Sbluen 03:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
This article comes right out and says "I am your retarded gay brother, and there's nothing you can do about it." It's so incoherent and bizzare, and it tries to be an article anyways. I applaud it's efforts... Mercy, mi amici. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Anything that's buried in two slashes isn't going to bother those who don't want to be bothered by it. --Spin 23:32, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
This article is filled with nothing but random templates, and then some chatter. Looks like a personal communication tool. --Emo tear </3 (Karn). 20:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
*Flush. I hate this article. Espcially the external link spam. This is the worst self-reference I have ever seen. --Sbluen 20:54, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Abomination. Not enough templates. Too coherent. Horrible POV. -- Imrealized 23:16, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Destroy This article gave me a seizure. Burn it. --emc! ╬ 00:36, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Waste o' Space. Attempts humor and fails miserably. Detrimental to Uncyclop
edia and Random Insanity. -- The Magistratus 02:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The vanity policy doesn't protect articles that make you want to jump off a cliff and get reincarnated into a different species so as to avoid being associated with anyone who wrote this shit from being deleted. --EvilZak 07:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
I have put this up for VFD. It now has one more template added to the pile, called "vfd". --Emo tear </3 (Karn). 20:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Eh. It was fun while it lasted. --ZombieJeff 01:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The ASCII art might be good. Can someone move it to the ASCII or ASCII art pages before it is deleted? --Sbluen 01:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
That extremely common ASCII that anyone can find using Google? Yeah, sure. --ZombieJeff 01:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Really? Then just let it be deleted. I don't think it's that good. I saw websites that were full of it on google. --Sbluen 01:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Go right ahead. I already knew that Google was reliable. --ZombieJeff 01:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
A bit of history - we had a bunch of bans related to people fucking up the GameFAQs page, and the GameFAQs/Random Insanity page kept getting filled with the sort of crap you see here. This page was created as a home for this stupid shit, so that the RI page could be kept somewhat readable and sensible. While it needs to be trimmed down, it still serves a function for the weekly RIer who comes in here and wants to do something bizzare and random. SirFamine,Gun♣Petition» 14:23, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Not this one, that's for sure. I think we should have a Jesus Jihad - a Jeshad! ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
I hate when I click the wrong link or end up in the wrong manor. Especially Wayne Manor. That guy's a douche, plus everytime I see him he looks so different. -- Imrealized 17:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Crucify. Any person could be made diet and described with all of this information. --Sbluen 17:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Just blow this thing up with a Über-Bomb for goodness' sake! -- Colonel Swordman 14:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep. But more expansion wouldn't hurt.--Cray Z. 06:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Keeper. Being gingered from wax crayons? The costume fiasco breakdown of events? Marmite? What's not to love? (agrees with Cray Z's expansion suggestion, though)-- Imrealized 17:35, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Precious few laughs here... I liked the line about not owning a hamster named Doris, but the rest of it needs so much work, I can't even guess where to start. Plus, it's a hitler article, and, well, those almost always suck! Kill. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep Well, I DID laugh a couple times... --George VI 22:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Same, it looks fine It could do with some work, but I don't reckon it merits deletion. - Whistler 14:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Too much random humor and not enough links. --Sbluen 17:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
How about 0%, stupid? -- Colonel Swordman 00:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Act 30 - The Deletion. -- Imrealized 00:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain. I'm fairly certain this is a very carefully written in-joke... I'll need to do more research on this. I don't mind in-jokes. After all, I have managed to kill a gazebo, but only once, and that was under First Edition rules. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 21:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
A bad clone of Nihilism. --Sbluen 22:50, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
At least it's appropriately titled for what's in store. -- Imrealized 02:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Sbulen's right, this has been done, and done more intellectually at that. --2nd Lt.Yellow DalekEX-TER-MI-NATE! (O-BEY!) 03:27, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
It's a special kind of genius, the kind that does Good Will Hunting math, but rides the little yellow bus to school. Modusoperandi 13:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
I love this article, but only because of its honesty and integrity.--<<>> 13:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Someone tried to save this article... but still not doing it for me. I'd maybe change my mind if the article started dancing naked... But it doesn't. Thus, Killage. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 02:53, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
The only improvement since the NRV tagging was the placement of the image. --Sbluen 03:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Another reason for writers to stay sober. Kill.--Cray Z. 06:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
I think this is a load of racist rubbish. There's no need for it to be on the wiki. --The Rt. Hon.BarryCMUN(Symposium!)Sigh.Double Sigh. 12:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
If there's one thing I hate, it's Arabs. I mean, the whole anti-american thing really gets me down. This article, although it also seems to hate Arabs, is dumber than StarWars Episode 1, the most horrid of Sci-Fi travesties. Thus, Kill this thing. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 23:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
It's also dumber than Frank-n-Furter, the most horrid of Sci-Fi transvestites. Delete. -- Imrealized 00:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Is this funny? I don't get it. I also don't speak latin, but I'm guessing that doesn't actually matter. Second, this author implies that you can get coffee at Starbucks. You can't. You can get abominable swill at Starbucks, but calling it coffee is just wrong. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 02:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Half of the links are red. --Sbluen 03:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
The moral of the story: Don't huff kittens when writing articles. -- Colonel Swordman 04:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
To ^: But that's where most Uncyclopedians get their inspiration. Anyway, DETONATE. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
I don't think this article is funny, and neither does Composure1, who tried to get this article deleted by adding a QVFD template. --Sbluen 18:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
You call this contentless piece of junk a "study"? -- Colonel Swordman 00:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Where's the article?? Some quotes + a smattering of words = Delete. -- Imrealized 00:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm voting to keep. While not rolling on the floor, I find the subtle humor amusing. I think there's a group of people in the world who will find this hilarious... I'd hate to ruin it for them. Also, I apologize to Sbluen for not signing this earlier. Man, I feel like such an ass. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 02:51, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep it - as a New Zealander, while not rolling on the floor over it either, it's still amusing. TheMono 04:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep. But if it doesn't get a rewrite, NUKE. --Cray Z. 07:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Leftover vanity from Dunedin's school system. --DW III 18:01, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
There is only one working link. --Sbluen 18:13, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
What to blow up a school? (Plant C4) "Fire in the hole!!! Fire in the hole!!!" -- Colonel Swordman 00:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Um... by huffing most of the "sun" references, this article could be a good piece of work. As a standalone piece, I've seen worse. Needs expansion, and if we move the article to "Captain Crunch", we fix the title. Though outvoted, I have to submit my plea for mercy. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 21:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
We already have Cap'n Crunch & this new stuff is inedible crap. --DW III 16:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Replace with a redirect to Cap'n Crunch. --Sbluen 16:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Wow, a page with crappy, repetitive lists. They can't even spell captain right...although it's right in the text itself. Plus Cap'n Crunch is gross Modusoperandi 18:50, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, my friend submit it and I tried to fix it up (I fixed all the captian to captain but the title isn't fixable) but the existance of the other article kind of makes it even more likely for deletion. Next time I'll make sure he sends the stuff to me before submitting it XD ~Chocceh. 21:10, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Stop making articles out of alpha-bits, kid! And learn how to spell! -- Colonel Swordman 00:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
You had my delete at "distinguished child molester". -- Imrealized 00:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Too much random humor. --Sbluen 15:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Yecch; dispose forthwith. --DW III 16:42, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Ew. ~Chocceh. 21:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
It's a short page that still manages to say shit seven times. Modusoperandi 21:28, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
The Shitpossum is fucking Hilarious! The article... makes me angry at all of mankind. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 21:33, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
...and it turns out the author is just the transvestite himself. *gag* -- Colonel Swordman 00:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
keep. Well written, but short. I must agree with Modusoperandi here, and say this should be a category, rather than an actual article. On the other hand, while lacking direct funny, it's concept is sufficiently ludicrous that I ask for mercy. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 21:32, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
WWWWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! -- Colonel Swordman 09:11, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Great idea, lots of potential, and despite all that... still utterly fucking worthless. fucking killTDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 21:30, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Gross but I could see some people finding this hilarious. --George VI 07:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Comment: Yes, looking at it, it is a bit sick. But it is sort of funny, in a gross way. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Converse 15:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep. It's a boring list, but I'm sure there's plenty who appreciate it. --Trevie 20:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep... for a list, it's got a lot loads of spunk. --Imrealized 19:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Just a list and a decidedly unfunny one at that. --Sirgwax (talk) 19:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I have stopped making that sort of jokes since 1996, but unfortunately lots of people here are still in their puberty. -- Colonel Swordman 03:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Since it's nomination, it has been lightly expanded, and shows some promise (assuming that edits continue). ~CaputosistheHorrible17:24, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Either I'm going soft or I'm waxing nostalgic. --Sirgwax (talk) 19:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Has potential, and it's an in-joke without being "too" in or being an annoying internet meme. I say Tag it for expansion instead of deletion expand and merge it with Konami Code, which currently looks to be a simple DaVinci Code joke with random, unfunny content that hasn't inspired any additions in 5 months. --Nakedman 22:15, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I liked it, sure it could use more content but it's not 3-second crap. Keep it and fatten it up.--Wit (tawk) 03:41, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Needs a little work, but it's funny. --Trevie 20:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Short, linkless, and not funny. --Sbluen 23:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
That reminds of the good Ol' Street Fighters, but heck - nostalgia is not a subsitute for a good article. -- Colonel Swordman
BURN BURN DEMOLISH DEMOLISH DETONATE DESTROY DETONATE DESTROY SET ALIGHT DELETE. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:59, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Unless someone does a significant rewrite of the entire article start to finish. This is not cutting it. The idea is really really good, but the execution tastes like poo. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 21:28, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
The IP that fixed the article also left a note in my talk page. --Sbluen 23:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
The sentence "At the begining the soldiers beat their heads on trees but then they realized that it hurt." is good. This article only needs to be rewritten. --Sbluen 23:21, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Put it in Pee Review and see if it is really worth keeping. -- Colonel Swordman 13:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I don't know if it's supposed to be self-referencial but this article is mighty boring. --Sirgwax (talk) 19:59, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Borderline funny, which isn't quite enough. --Trevie 20:04, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Utter, Incomparable Feces! This is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no time did the author make a statement even resembling a coherent thought. Everyone on Uncyclopedia is now dumber for having read this. I award no points, and may God have mercy on the Author's soul. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 21:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
An extension of an old inside joke, very short, only one page (other than VFD) links to it, contains only 10 sentences, is very short...and Chuck Norris. ~CaputosistheHorrible16:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
BTW, I don't hate Chuck Norris, just the Chuck Norris inside joke. ~ Simulacrum Caputosis 16:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Just end this nonsense with a roundhouse kick already! -- Colonel Swordman 17:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
BUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRN! Only the original was any good. The rest should all be pwnt. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Agree with SimulacrumCaputosis. Poor extension of a good joke. -Trevie 19:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Deserves to die; shoot it. --DW III 20:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Short, random, boring, and linkless. --Sbluen 00:06, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
This thing is definitely qualified to join the Losers League. -- Colonel Swordman 03:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
See above for more details.--Wit (tawk) 03:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
As per ^, ^ and even further above that. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:04, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
"Deletion Finalists: Champion League" ~CaputosistheHorrible15:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
I found it funny, which is why I'm not going to vote delete. However it really needs expanding. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Converse 15:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Oh my LORD! Abortion for this article. This is an abomination againt all which is holy! TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 00:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC) (Yes, I am intentionally copying my own words here.)
This article has too much random humor and repitition and has no links. --Sbluen 03:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Another comedic catastrope due to the writer's lack of forethoughts and planning. "Second lunch" seems a good idea to me, but the content is just way too unsalvageable-- Colonel Swordman 13:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Yet another improper NRV on an old article by an IPeon. What is the wiki coming to? I do, however, agree, that it is JUNK. >Major Sir Hinoa|Talk|KUN▋ 01:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
This has been deleted 4 times when made by an anon IP. There is no Wikipedia article by this name, but many google hits for many different (apparently) people. As this doesn't seem to refer to any specific famous one, we can only conclude it is still vanity. --Splaka 05:37, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Kill it dead. •Spang•☃•talk• 05:43, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Some sort of retarded inside joke gone wrong? Put the hurt on it. --emc! ╬ 05:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
We can't just take your word on the cool facial hair — ya need pics. Also, it sucks. -- Imrealized 06:39, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
As it's apparently vanity... DETONATE! ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 06:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Not funny, and has had editorial issues in the past. Just horrid. 'Abort this fetus, and move onwards. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 23:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry to say that no article is better than either of these. Er, that makes sense, right? -- Imrealized 04:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I was the "one person" mentioned below, so might as well vote on this too while I'm at it. c • > •cunwapquc? 05:22, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
May I be the final vote to blam this piece of crap. --emc! ╬ 05:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
I took my time with this one, read over it's history, and since one person on Village Dump said that both the current and previous versions suck anus, I submit this article for the masses to rule on. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 23:14, 23 June 2006 (UTC) Yes, I know I changed the table... I'm rebellious that way
With authors producing crap like this, it's no wonder we haven't bothered to cure cancer yet. Absolutely disgusting. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 23:20, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
This article is of poor quality, and there is already a Mexican-American War. Basically, this piece of crap sucks. --emc! ╬ 00:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Shoot. Or at least delete the list at the end. --Sbluen 00:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Hell, I vote to delete the original as well. SirFamine,Gun♣Petition» 02:08, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Uses the word "immagrants". I checked, there is no such word. Sufficiently ludicrous, but lacking execution and style. And I hate the reference to Captain Skywalker. Yup, Delete. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:42, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Death to the unfunny vegetable cult.--Cray Z. 06:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
I wasn't talking about you, Hinoa. The author of the article removed the NRV tag first. I only put back Splaka's NRV tag. --Sbluen 06:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Was on NRV & since expanded; going nowhere fast. --DW III 17:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Burn. For the good of the empire. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:42, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Crunch the number. I expected more than just two links after I added the NRV tag. Both are links to overused people. --Sbluen 18:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
