Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive32

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

The Dearth Star

Author withdrew deletion request. Voting ended. Kept. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 00:15, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


As requested. ~ T. (talk) 18:16, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Undeleted: continue voting. By posting, certain copyrights are given up and content comes under our license and, as such, author request is not reason enough to cause the unilateral deletion of an article. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:36, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
It's fortunate then that you weren't a sysop when UtarEmpire asked for his articles to be deleted. So happens, I disagree with your narrow interpretation, as well as your tendency to act on your own, such as your similarly narrow-minded recent change to the front page, despite the feelings of several admins. ~ T. (talk) 23:52, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Er, let's keep this off VFD, please... --—rc (t) 00:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

DELETE on author's request - Please see author's commentary under WWJJD? Please vote DELETE. Thank you. --Imrealized 05:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

See comments on User's Talk page (I wish I knew how to put a link right to it... sorry) --Imrealized 00:00, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Keep - forget that --Imrealized 00:02, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

  • BALEET! Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 05:58, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, but I am sleep deprived. CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS  07:41, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Imrealized may be disillusioned and leaving Uncyclopedia, but his work should remain since it is most excellent. Yendor33 10:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Honor Request: I am never happy to see that a writer has given up on Uncyclopedia, especially because one feels unwelcome. That has happened, or at least been in danger of happenning, too often recently in my opinion. That said, however, I think that we should honor the wishes of our writers so long as they have valid reasons, which I believe is the case here. True, we are not compelled to do so, and true, anyone else may still legally copy the article, but we need to think of this as an extra assurance to our writers that we will take care of them. I would hate to see other writers be reticent to contribute because we had not served previous writers well. If ever I had a serious issue that caused me to decide to withdraw my own writings, I would hope to have that request honored. I think we should do the same here. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 23:07, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Honour Request. ~ T. (talk) 23:52, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Sith Vicious

Author withdrew deletion request. Voting ended. Kept. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 00:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


As requested. ~ T. (talk) 18:16, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Undeleted: continue voting. By posting, certain copyrights are given up and content comes under our license and, as such, author request is not reason enough to cause the unilateral deletion of an article. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

DELETE on author's request --Imrealized 05:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Keep - after consideration of comments --Imrealized 00:01, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Hide and Go Jesus

Author withdrew deletion request. Voting ended. Kept. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 00:17, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


As requested. ~ T. (talk) 18:16, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Undeleted: continue voting. By posting, certain copyrights are given up and content comes under our license and, as such, author request is not reason enough to cause the unilateral deletion of an article. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

DELETE on author's request --Imrealized 05:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Bukkake Manga

Author withdrew deletion request. Voting ended. Kept. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 00:18, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


As requested. ~ T. (talk) 18:16, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Undeleted: continue voting. By posting, certain copyrights are given up and content comes under our license and, as such, author request is not reason enough to cause the unilateral deletion of an article. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

DELETE on author's request --Imrealized 05:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Natism

Phil Spector

  • Delete No merit. --84.165.219.117 03:39, 21 March 2006 (UTC) (ehm, --Bringa 03:41, 21 March 2006 (UTC) I meant)
  • Delete Short and unsweet. Not funny. --Kafeithekeaton 02:45, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD. This one could have been avoided for voting methinks. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 13:27, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Too much of an inside joke. The sins and principles have some value, but that's basically it. --Trevie 15:25, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet - Esoteric humour in a really short article. --Trevie 15:36, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)


Madmen

  • Delete. I'd rather watch politicians discuss taxes. --Bringa 03:42, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, meh, this can be a lot better. --Kafeithekeaton 23:10, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Nerv it or QVFD it. It'll save a bunch of time for such a waste of an article...--Jocke Pirat 23:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I'll take the bull by the nostrils here, and Nerv it myself. Consider teh voting closed. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)13:25, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)


Crazy Taco

Al Paris

  • Delete. Little Content. Not funny. --Kafeithekeaton 00:57, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Make up your own reason here. Karmafist 03:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Too short and unfunny. --Imrealized 06:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. And Nerv it while we're at it. Holy God. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 15:15, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete or add a LOT of content to --Trevie 15:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete the hell out of it. --Spang 17:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Todd

  • Delete. Unfunny. --Kafeithekeaton 00:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per that skinny Japanese Hot Dog Eating guy. Karmafist 03:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Took you folks long enough. This is one of the first articles that I started here and it is crap. I am unappologetic though, because my early failing helped mold me into the man that I am now, capable of far greater failings. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 05:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Although it takes the fun out of it when you lobby for its deletion...my first article was shit, too (literally). --Imrealized 06:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Todd may be helpful, and Todd may be there for you -- hell Todd may be the best face-card in the deck, but he's no good as an article. Bravo, Gwax! :) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:57, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Practice makes perfect... Apparantly, Gwax has had a whole lot of practice. (Though I suspect he's still not perfect) TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 15:14, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, and let it rest in peace. --Spang 17:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • On behalf of all Todds, we deserve a little better. Delete.  :) Gwax can keep him under his user page until he grows some legs. ~ T. (talk) 18:27, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to your user page, Todd Lyons.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 07:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Memento

  • Delete: you could do so much better with the topic. Why not write an article backwards and have the writer become very paranoid about the readers halfway through? Anything but this unfunny ramble. --Bringa 03:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Just sorta rambles... and a little dull. Not very funny.--Kafeithekeaton 00:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • NRV. I'm sure something better could be done for this film. Not with any of this crap though. --Spang 00:48, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Maybe I should read one of these things... Karmafist 03:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - there's no saving this one. --Imrealized 06:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. A total lack of effort devoted to a crappy joke centered on a bad premise. The author deserves to be attacked by wild dingos with halitosis. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 14:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD!!! Really, it's there for just this sort of thing. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:58, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

MaRonite Church

  • Delete: Fuck this page. It annoys me. Jack Cain 23:19, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Arr! Blow me down! This be the most awful piece o' writing I has ever come across! Arrr! (end pirate mode) UNKNOWNFILE 19:20, 19 March 2006 (EST)
  • Lose it --Spang 00:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • AAAAAA! -- Hogsig AAA AAAAA AAAAAAA [AAAAAAAAAAA] AAA 06:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Bye-bye - No comment (surprising, huh?) --Imrealized 06:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. Uncyclopedia! Proudly bringing you the Dregs of the Internet... Hey, that should be our new Motto! User:TD 14:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Article and author. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:00, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

DR-DOS

  • Delete: Way to random, unrelated and not very funny for my taste. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, I can't stand random "humour" like this. --Spang 20:33, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - There is potential for the start of an article focusing on OS eliteism if you could salvage and rerwite the first paragraph, but most of DR-DOS is utterly irredeemable. --Xoid 22:31, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Hogsig AAA AAAAA AAAAAAA [AAAAAAAAAAA] AAA 06:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Whoa. --Imrealized 06:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Whoa. - User:TD 14:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC) (Imrealised, you said it quite succinctly, there)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! This isn't "Random humor." It's "Random shit." --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Gods of Civilization

  • Delete: WTF? Is there any sort of coherency here? --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • That layout makes me sick, delete it before I throw up. Also, it's not funny. --Spang 20:35, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill it, before it kills us all. --Xoid 22:38, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Hogsig AAA AAAAA AAAAAAA [AAAAAAAAAAA] AAA 06:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I like the idea of the borg being in league with Adam West, and the pic of Bjorn Borg amuses me, but very little funny content. Bits and pieces could be salvaged by a good Rewrite... Ah, screw it. Delete this pile of gobshite. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 14:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Again, "Random shit." Note the distinct aroma and flavor. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:07, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Calculator Nazis

  • Delete: So much random not funniness and so many red links; it hurts my eyes. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill it. --Spang 20:38, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Die Die Die. Ditto with Gwax. --Kafeithekeaton 00:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Hogsig AAA AAAAA AAAAAAA [AAAAAAAAAAA] AAA 06:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Killing this article would be a service to humanity. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 14:16, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! There can be only one fascist automaton here, and that's me. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

John Cage

*Delete - After initially thinking this was about the Mortal Kombat character, I had to look Mr. Cage up. What I found was interesting - the dude wrote a musical piece of nothing but silence. Our Uncyclopedia entry basically says just that, and if that's funny, I'm missing something. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 17:44, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep - Sometimes truth is funnier than fiction. --Hubert Cumberdale 19:32, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I think we should keep this, I found most of it funny, though it could use some rewriting and proper formatting. When someone writes a song comprising entirely of silence, you can't really make up much about it that's funnier than the truth. Except if you add ... in stereo to it. --Spang 20:42, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Which I just did. I'll have a go at rewriting the rest of it, too. Rewritten. I think it's much better now. Keep? --Spang 20:55, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep --Spin 01:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
    • And somebody should VFH it too. I'm too lazy to do it myself. --Spin 01:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. [[The Punisher] was funny but somewhat true as well, and it got deleted. Why treat other articles differently? At least be consistant here people. So is funny but true acceptable unless written by me? --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 03:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
    • There's an important detail here: the reality of John Cage is a whole lot funnier than the reality of The Punisher, so it requires less bending of the truth to get humor. I'm sorry that one of your first attempts at an article got nuked; it's something that's happened to almost everyone here (more than a few times for me). If you'd like to talk about it more, drop me a note on my talk page. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 05:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
      • I'm sorry I don't get the John Cage joke at all. The Punisher was made funny because I connected the skull on his chest to being a pirate, and I made him originally a hippie that didn't like violence, not really true of the real comic book Punisher, but it added an irony to the story which made it funny. Like he was going to devote his life to peace, feeding the hungry, helping the poor, before his family was gunned down by criminals. In any case I left you a message on your talk page. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 01:34, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Even one of my articles got nuked. 'Votes' like yours are a good reason to ignore pure numbers - David Gerard 20:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep and Consider It VFHed - I know John Cage's music (I'm actually somewhat of a fan if you can believe that) and this is frickin' hysterical! I didn't bother to look at the old edits, but if you brought this from VFDed to the state it is now then I'm impressed. Thanks for the laughs. --Imrealized 07:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 07:42, 20 March 2006 (UTC) -- IP vote [1] --Splaka 07:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 14:35, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • PRE-SERVE!!! Oh, hell yeah. Where's my approval setting? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:27, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, of course - David Gerard 20:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Castle. I mean, palace. Stronghold? Chateau? Bastion? Well, don't delete it. It's insanely awesomely insane. --84.165.219.117 03:38, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep. John Cage is 'da bomb. Lemme know when 4'33" comes out on DVD... --Visit my web page for more info.

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:41, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Get better

Encyclopædia_Dramatica

Destroy: this piece of crap only serves to insert itself into otherwise usefull maintanence pages. And it makes my eyes bleed. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 06:32, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. Excessively difficult to read and understand, which taken by itself is rather funny, but this page tries too hard to achieve too much, and in doing so, fails. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 13:24, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 14:26, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. In-jokes are undeletable. To strip categories from all those templates, see UN:HAX. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 14:36, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Blast this article to bits. It makes my butt hurt. UNKNOWNFILE on 20:37, 18 March 2006 (EST)
  • Keep. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 06:08, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. --Xoid 11:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - I hate to say it, but with my limited experience with ED, this is somehow fitting. Though a quality ED satire would easily blow this out of the water, it's a decent placeholder. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 13:38, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep --The only thing I see wrong witht this page is that it might be too close to the truth. --Naughtius Maximus Leaf F@H Woof!Za slice MeowMUN 19:34, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - The article's crappiness is meant to mimic how unfunny they are. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 21:44, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep We shall forever parody that website....--Nytrospawn 21:58, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • DeleteJessten95 23:20, 19 March 2006 (UTC) That is the worst shit I have saw since 2111 when Britney Spears porn video debuted
  • Keep--Spin 01:42, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - I've never even stopped over there but I've heard enough to know that this is a perfect parody. --Imrealized 16:31, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • PRE-SERVE!!! This is a perfect pairing to Wikipedia's article on the sad world of these morbidly obese shut-in trolls. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:49, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:38, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Homestar Runner

  • Keep: It was NRVed and then deleted but I liked it a bunch so I undeleted it and am putting it up here. While I admit that the article isn't the best one out there, I would like to point out that for anyone who knows them both, the juxtaposition of Homestar Runner and Jerkcity is one of the funniest things ever made. While it appears as though all of the comics were created by simply photoshopping Homestar into Jerkcity comics, I feel that such an action is a work of comic genius. Beyond that, I would love it if someone could write an article that was worthy of Homestar, Jerkcity and the bastard amalgamation of the two that someone has seeded. Perhaps, if I can find time, I shall be just such a revisionary someone. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • teh rewrite. it's got some promise, but it sux as of now. Scythe33 21:11, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: This isn't funny at all, it's just mean and innapropriate. My 8 year old brother (who loves the homestarrunner website) came across this and was really disturbed. Now he is not only uncomfortable 24/7, but he doesn't go to the website anymore. User:67.160.2.191 14:57, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Keep your 8-years-old brother away from Uncyclopedia. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
      • Seriously, the internet in general and Uncyclopedia in specific is not a very safe place for an 8-year old to be playing around. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 02:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and Expand.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 03:35, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 03:54, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite: Sewiously, Pom Pom. We can come up with something better than THAT. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:45, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 06:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite. And make the pictures bigger. - Ghelaetalkcontribs 16:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite or Expand. Far too short, and it's not like it's original comedy. ~H. 17:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Homestarrunner is not now, and never will be funny. The only thing mildly amusing is strongbad's email. I say we deliver a mercy killing, a flashcomic focusing on a mental retard does not do it for me. However, the thing about a bathtub full of warm piss is fuckin' classic.TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)TD 21:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet. Going into MSChat with a Homestar avatar is what passes for an Uncyclopedia article now? --Andrusi 13:06, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment: If you've ever seen the comic Jerkcity, you will understand that they have done something far cleverer than just use MSChar. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:05, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Gwax, by this article and by the way you've defended it on here I can see you have some talent, but I just don't think that a bastard amalgamation of two very fringe, obscure or otherwise irrelevant comics (or whatever) should exist in this world...it just ain't right. Hobbling around, barely breathing - can't you see it's in pain, man? Plus, I don't want marijuana related to this, um, this...whatever. Let it go and focus your talents on, well, something else. --Imrealized 14:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - If the comics in this article are representative of jerkcity.com, jerkcity.com is in trouble. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 13:48, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Deleted but a copy has been saved at User:Gwax/Homestar Runner in case anyone (like me) ever wants to rewrite it. Voting closed. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:34, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Gregor Mendel

  • Sentence to death --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 16:12, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The GuillotineiconGuillotine is His Majesty's recommendation as to the appropriate sentencing for this defilement.. I'd suggest a rewrite, but it would take more effort than it's worth. You could actually make some of the ideas funny, but the original context would still have to go. --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 16:30, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 18:31, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Stavanger

  • Baleet It was like READING someone having a seizure. Terrible. --ENeGMA 04:32, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

VFD

  • Deleted Just a bunch of bad links and whining. --—rc (t) 01:49, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

The Ghost

  • Delete this damn page. It's too vandalized. And bku512 shits in his pants!!!(really he did!...Seriously!). The Ghost 11:55, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Fuck your pants-shitting page up the arse until it bleeds.Censored version:GuillotineViciously Guillotine.
--CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 16:23, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Battle For The Mountian

The End of the world

  • Guillotineicon"to the Guillotine!" shouts His Royal Majesty, "for the crime of being a terrible collection of garbled words jumbled into a short paragraph-like structure that sexually violates the English language"

--CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 22:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Fluff

Deleted. ~ T. (talk) 18:23, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Once again, Random Page brings us a winning example of how to rot your fucking brain. Delete - TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 20:06, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD. No trial necessary. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:31, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Guillotineicon"to the Guillotine!" shouts His Royal Majesty, "for the crime of being 100% pure random garbage piled together as a hodgepodge of flaming debris that shames not only Uncyclopedia and the internet, but human intelligence worldwide"

--CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 22:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - nen. --Imrealized 23:01, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Maybe it's meant to be ironic? An article of fluff about fluff? This is what nerving was invented for! --Spang 23:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Eddie Murphy's Private Island

  • I had this tagged on my Watchlist a while back, and come to find out, one-third of my watchlist has been huffed. Thus, I can only conclude that I know what's best for Uncyclopedia, and this page gets my patented Thumbs-Downtm. Delete TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 19:46, 22 March 2006 (UTC) (my watchlist is poplulated primarily with articles I hate)
  • The GuillotineiconGuillotine is His Majesty's recommendation as to the appropriate sentencing for this defilement.

--CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 22:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete it. --Spang 02:59, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Peter R. de Vries

  • Is this funny? Should I know this guy? Would any of teh Norwiegans care if we garbage disposaled this article? Oy gevalt. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 17:47, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Not Norweigan, but baleet it. Too random. --Trevie 18:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - Wow. I didn't understand a single bloody thing in this one. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 18:46, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Sorry, the only thing I've got is the fact that in Frank Herbert's Dune, the Mentat Master of Assassins for House Harkonnen was named Pieter deVries. Funny enough, he died from a poison-gas false tooth in Duke Leto's mouth, so there's dentistry for you. The author of this tripe, however, is obviously too thick to make that sort of subtle connection. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
COM-MENT!!! I just read back over that post, and God, I'm a dork. I'm sorry, all. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:08, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment: No Probs, King-man. I own Dune in movie form, and used to own it in book form. All references to Dune get an automatic TD-Approved Thumbs-Uptm YAY! TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 19:43, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Stiff upper lip, Dalek! What would Sting and Patrick Stewart say? — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 20:26, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
"I WILL KILL HIM!" and "I thought you were dead, boy!" respectively, if memory serves correctly. :) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:33, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Maynooth

  • Oh god, the horror. I say we Delete this. It smacks of New Edmontonshire to me, and that's not a good thing. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 17:31, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • E-RA-DI-CATE!!! "Offally signed" indeed. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:05, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - take that Kevin Murphy! (See what I did there? I referenced something from the last paragraph to make it seem like I read the whole thing, when in fact I only read the first and last paragraphs, which was quite enough) --Imrealized 00:21, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Leave Tom Servo outta this! He's a stand-up sort of bot! (I wonder if that's the "Kevin Murphy" they're referring to) :D --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:58, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. For the good of humanity. --Spang 03:04, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Guillotineicon"to the Guillotine!" shouts His Royal Majesty, "for the crime of using passive tense to such an extent as to kill brain cells" --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 16:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

The Violator

Comment: Suddenly, Chuck Norris is hilarious, but only if referenced on VFD in a negative way. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 17:31, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Mr mahood

  • Delete: First off, it's a bad title, should be "Mr Mahood". Second, article is misspelled. Third, it's irrelavent prose appearing to be vanity. Fourth, it is undeniably useless, and no-one outside of New Edmontonshire will care. Off with it's head. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 15:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - sadly, this might have been improved by a Chuck Norris reference...no, wait. Chuck Norris references do not improve anything. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 15:21, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Boring. --Trevie 15:49, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Q-V-F-D!!! This looks to be the same "Zaheem Mahmood" crap that's been huffed time and time again for being slander/vanity. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - for commentary, see article's final template --Imrealized 00:37, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Murloc

Deleted. ~ T. (talk) 18:25, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - I suspect I should have just NRV'd this crap, but the moment I saw "Chuck Norris" my eyes went red and I wanted to share my pain with the rest of the VFD crew. Dalek, blast this thing with your ray-gun. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 14:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Imprison for 10,000 years </maiev> Nah, just burn. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 14:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Ooo, my services are requested! Funny, since I've actually been playing WC3 again in my spare time between GEN-O-CID-AL-PURG-ES work and thesis. Anyway, EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Oh, and tell Illidan he's a snake-nerd. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:37, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • What is it with the Chuck Norris thing? It's not funny, and yet an unfairly high number of retards seem to think that every article is improved with a Chuck Norris reference? It's not right, and the author of this article deserves to see his hard work deleted. Sill, a number of WoW fans deserve to be picked on, but based solely off of the Chuck thing... Delete. - TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 14:59, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - It might be funnier if I played WoW, but I don't.... --Trevie 15:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity. Google has 311,000 hits.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 21:48, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment - How's this vanity? A Murloc is a fictional amphibious humanoid from Blizzard's Warcraft universe. Of course google has hits, it's from a popular line of games. You are correct about it needing to be deleted, though. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:54, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Dietcokeandmentos

  • Delete - I was hesitant to bring something else here but I think in this case it's warranted. Don't click the link (developers, developers, developers). --Imrealized 12:01, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete- Looks like vanity.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 13:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I was thinking delete until I read the words "Chuck" and "Norris." Now I'm thinking Maul, Torture, and Maul again. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 13:40, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • ZZZZT! EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Utter dreck. Even the title hurts my optics. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Holy God... It's so terrible I'm laughing at the author... Delete this before it infects the rest of us with stupid TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 14:45, 22 March 2006 (UTC)


I'm masturbating on your face

Deleted. ~ T. (talk) 18:28, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete: Title is hilarious... Article is too... um... bad. I mean, wow, man... garbage central here. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 21:48, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff it! UNKNOWNFILE, 18:18, 21 March 2006 (EST)
  • And now I am going to be sitting on yours. Delete. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 23:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Off with its head--Jocke Pirat 01:01, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Chainsawmidget 23:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • That last image on the page is disturbing, even to me. Flush It --Toloran 06:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Bye Bye Now - sheesh! --Imrealized 12:06, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I'd keep for the name, but Delete for the content. Terrible. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 12:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-FUC-KING-NATE!!! Absolute shit. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:16, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD. Pr0n.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 21:50, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Młodzież Wszechpolska

  • Okay the first clue is that in looking at this pages name, we can see letters which do not belong in English. Secondly, reading the article reveals a level of incoherency which can only be achieved by speaking a completely different language. I don't want to be mean to immigrants, but, unless someone speaks up to say they find this funny, I think it's time to Delete. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 20:00, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I speak polish as a second language, and several of the words in polish in the article are ones that I haven't even heard of, nor my native speaking family in the country. Delete. --Jocke Pirat 01:06, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - This is easily a candidate for "worst of." — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 13:46, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Sorry, not enough unintentional funny to qualify for "Worst Of." (No "Crappers is very sucking members" here. Heh, "member.") --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:26, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The GuillotineiconGuillotine is His Majesty's recommendation as to the appropriate sentencing for this defilement. --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 16:41, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Paragliding

Porsche

  • This is a tough one. Clearly we need a page on Porsche, but this isn't cutting the mustard. It's well-written, it's coherent, it contains no humor... I don't want to see this article huffed, but I think we have no choice but to Delete it, until someone else can do better. User:TD 14:32, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Clean up and keep - A little wordy. --Trevie 15:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - This roadster needs a tune-up, and I ain't gonna do it. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 16:55, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE this pathetic attempt at extending one's manhood... plus, the article's not very good, either. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:02, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Happy And Fun Death Syndrome

  • KeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEePPPPP!!! I fell out of my chair laughing. Flameviper12 18:34, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: It's lacking that special, how the French say, "Je ne sais crois" humor. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: However, the HANDS, STUDS, SHITS/escargo thing is funny. Everything else is horrid smelly garbage. User:TD - 21:19, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete it, it's baaaaad. And it's "Je ne sais quoi". --Spang 21:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Similar to Super Happy Fun Ball.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 07:16, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • At the risk of sounding far out of character, I'm going with a Keep. CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 22:06, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: not that bad... made ma laugh (nemmo) Unsigned --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 13:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - I suspect this mess is a result of writing "after smoking copious amounts of pot." — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 14:54, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

82.141.192.251 12:06, 24 March 2006 (UTC) Found it funny... The symptoms describes seems to apply to a lot of people...

Battle for Adams College

  • Delete: I almost hate to do this, as this article has had Splaka's hand in it, but I just don't get it, and though it seems nonsensical enough to survive... with my innate +5 to save vs funny articles, it's just not strong enough for me. TD 20:31, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, it just isn't good enough to be an article. It needs a big expansion and a lot more funny before it becomes salvagable. --Spang 21:40, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - No. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 17:30, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Crazy glasses

  • Delete: Lots of effort, but no funniness discernable. This article makes me sad. -TD- - 19:30, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. I don't find it all that funny myself, but it's not exactly bad. Could definitely be funnier, but I don't think this one needs to go just yet. --Spang 21:31, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - It's surprising how much effort went into this, but in the end it's a lost cause. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 17:37, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Honestly, the "bag lady" classifications got a chuckle out of me, but the rest just falls flat. Maybe a RE-FA-BRI-CA-TION!!! is in order? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Zack de la Rocha

  • Delete, Sorry, but that just sucks. I don't have any other words to describe it. -Tiny
  • Delete, same as below. --Spang 19:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Though there's effort involved, it's not going to save this article from being uglier than personified sin. User:TD 19:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Fire Photons Torpedos at this intergalactic threat! --Captain Caputosis····Communicatorbadgehail21:59, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Tom Morello

  • Delete, it just isn't funny, and the red links hurt my feelings. --Spang 19:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Honestly, what is this shit? I truly feel like there are people out there who random cut&paste sentences form 50 unrelated google searches together, and then submit it under the guise of "an article". Any given sentence has no actual connection to the one preceeding, or the one after. It's like some lobotomized nitwit just started bashing on his keyboard. I wonder, how does this author manage to dress him/her self in the morning without accidentally choking on their own shoe? TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 19:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - TD, your rant is a lot funnier than this article. That being said, it's probably also true. The author may be dying as we speak, choking on a Chuck Taylor All-Star. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 15:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Spooge McDuck

  • Delete. I haven't put anything on vfd for a while; random page found me this for my fix. --Spang 00:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. When you know what something means, and it's still not funny, it deserves to be burninated. --Kafeithekeaton 00:48, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep because succumbing to peer pressure isn't cool, my guidance counselor said so in a touching after school special. Karmafist 03:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - although a nekkid pic of Daisy Duck might make me change this...harharhar. --Imrealized 06:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This article is an abomination. The picture makes me want to scream Why God, WHY?. The relatively coherent writing does nothing to salvage this pile of steaming literary feces. I wish that I could meet the author, so that I could stab him in the forehead with a rusty fork. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) - 14:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! I could waste time with an explanation, but come on. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Mostly coherent. --Chronarion 19:17, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Fire Photons Torpedos at this intergalactic threat! --Captain Caputosis····Communicatorbadgehail21:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Its more coherent then alot of pages, but it lacks one thing: Teh Funny. BURNINATE. --Toloran 06:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Tom Osborne

  • DE-STROY!!! (same as below) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Smashy! I think I'm going to vomit. 'Scuse me... (barf) --H. 19:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Lose it. --Spang 20:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • weak keep: I dunno, man. A reference to both naked jell-o twister, and the time warp, in the same article... That's kinda hard to come by these days. I gots no clue who the fuck Tom is, but I've seen worse... Far worse.TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)20:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite - Tom Osborne really will be the next Governor of Nebraska, and nude jello wrestling is the new in thing in Congress. That being said, it needs a good rewrite. Jlove1982 20:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • eak-way eep-kay ith-way ewright-ray(weak keep with rewrite) could use immprovement, and the nude jell-o twister is funny... --Bilbobaggins 23:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 05:30, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Demolish. Boring and too many god references imn the first 2 paragraphs. - Ghelaetalkcontribs 16:06, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Annihilate this pathetic piece of shit. --Xoid 23:19, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The GuillotineiconGuillotine is His Majesty's recommendation as to the appropriate sentencing for this defilement. --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 18:58, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Theory of Random Timing

1....34....Z.... DELETED -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 22:14, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete: I find a complete lack of humor here. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 02:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I see the humor in the horrible timing, but... not much. Smashy. --H. 03:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • keep with rewrite tag - David Gerard 10:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • rewrite. Idea has potential, sounds too good to be casually tossed away. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)18:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 23:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete or maybe Rewrite... its an interesting idea and could go places... maybe.--Mrfrence 02:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I thought it had potential too, I even read it over a second time - but sorry, it's hopeless. If someone rewrites this, it should be called Non-Linear Time Theory instead, which is more "trekkie"-sounding. Someone who may or may not be a user 08:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep This can be rewritten properly. As is it is a good stub. --Chronarion 23:16, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Demolish. Seems too serious to me. - Ghelaetalkcontribs 16:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment it seems that about any page that begins with "Theory of..." turns out to be crap. Maybe we should get rid of all of them. --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 18:55, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

WWJJD?

As requested. ~ T. (talk) 18:18, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Undeleted: continue voting. By posting, certain copyrights are given up and content comes under our license and, as such, author request is not reason enough to cause the deletion of an article. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Deletion request withdrawn. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 00:20, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Okay, maybe this article is too British, but I don't get the joke and have no desire to slog through it to find one. And neither should you. Let's euthanize this sunuvabitch. --Hobelhouse 14:51, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment: He's Irish, not British. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  • Keep. Genius stuff, man. --DeathByPie 18:51, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • PRE-SERVE-AT-ALL-COSTS!!! Reads like the latter half of Ulysses! Wow. I'm infuriated and awed at the same time! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:11, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the defense everyone. The joke is that it reads like Finnegans Wake, uses some of the same devices (the recurring initials HCE and ALP, several languages, words that can be read in a multitude of ways), discusses similar topics (but usually leanin' toward sex and masturbation), and now you've fortified the joke because, like the Wake, it was oft misunderstood. So thanks for bringing it here... --Imrealized 19:46, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
    • OMG, I can't believe I forgot about Wake! And I have the nerve call myself an English Master, MA! (Oh well, that's what I get for going Post-modernist instead of Modernist!) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

*DELETE by decree of page author - Well, I've been here for approximately a week and a half... some of you have been really kind and welcoming and I thank you sincerely. But others evidently have a deep-rooted problem with me and, aside from that, will not talk to me honestly, like a human being. So I am now departing (yea... you've won! How grand for you!) but can't see why, if I am such a horrible person, told that "the cabal" is against me and have someone like Sir Dawg, who I've never had any interaction with at all, say they are "strongly against" me as a contributor, when in the short time I've been here I've been, in my mind, near prolific, I don't see why those types of people should benefit from my work. Please, I implore you, to vote DELETE please. Thank you. --Imrealized 05:03, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep - although I see they've been deleted again... oh well. Good try all. --Imrealized 00:10, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The GuillotineiconGuillotine is His Majesty's recommendation as to the appropriate sentencing for this defilement. --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS  07:41, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: It's as unpenetrable as most James Joyce stuff, this man deserves a Pulitzer for that kind of skill. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
  • If this article was to be kept in Uncyclopedia, then it would require a humongous clean up, making this almost impossible not to vote delete. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 22:34, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment - Clean this up? Fuckin' illiterate Americans!
Personal tools
projects