Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive28

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Zero life

I re-formatted this into an undictionary article. The original uncyclopedia entry still remains, and could probably be deleted now. Does this sound Kosher? If so, delete and move on. -- User:TD blabber

Fossil fuel

Although not complete and utter crap, the line about witches isn't bad. Otherwise it's a stub, and does us no good. I say we toss it into the garbage chute, light the boilers, call it a day -- User:TD blabber

  • DEALT WITH: I changed it to a disambig page, added a certified Pun and moved previous content to last section of Fossil Fuels page.--Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 15:36, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • That's FUNNY-- User:TD blabber
  • Move it to Undictionary--Jtaylor1Small Egg 21:53, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Hey, c'mon. It's disambiguity. Don't move every entry shorter than 5 lines to Undictionary, just to be pissed at it as a stub dump.--Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 23:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

REDIRECTED to Fossil Fuels because it was the right thing to do. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Mispeelings

These were redirects, until Mindsunwound made them proper articles. Still, as I think, not proper enough. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 15:52, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Wow, they all suck bad. Explodinate with extreme predjudice.Karma Llama 16:19, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
  • "To the GuillotineiconGuillotine should the lot of them be marched."
--CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 21:46, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

DEALT WITH --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 13:06, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Rot-31337

World War XVIII

*Yawn. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 13:02, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Necessarily

Burninated on behest of the screaming villagers. --DW III CUNOUN 18:45, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

I_HAVE_THE_POWER_HEHAHEHAHEHAHEHAHEHAHEH

  • Don't do drugs or you'll end up like this article. --80.167.172.134 12:15, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Old hippie chick who's always collecting money

QVFD material. Huffinated. -- <s>Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 23:53, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep it This is part of the neighbor template, and its not that bad. It may need work, and I may be its creator, but it isn't as bad as World War XVIII. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Just to clarify, this is referring to a previous version of the article and not the version Priettiestpretty posted on the 25th, right?
  • TBH I nearly deleted it too, just on the article title, which I've seen created before. As this is intended as part of a section I say we hold fire on any decision until its completed. Keep.....for now. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 20:58, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep It's a little rough around the edges, but it's funnier than a lot of things we've voted to keep. Strong Rad 00:44, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, of course, and that's the last time I create a sectional template before the articles are finished! And no more red links on sectional templates, either. These are valuable lessons, young padawan. Anyway, an anonIP user got to the red link before we could... From what I can tell it went from red link to VFD to deleted within 8 hours.  c • > • cunwapquc? 04:56, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, it made me laugh and want a old lady to fuck with my mind-- Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3 NotM BLK |_LG8+::: 07:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Je ne comprends pas. This seems too esoteric and just too weird to be worth keeping. I don't understand how or why it's funny.--ShroomsShroom!Gay2Sir Flammable KUN Prince%21.gif (Na Naaaaa...)Gay2Shroom!Shroomirror 08:34, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Smells like vanity/teen slander. --Jtaylor1Small Egg 08:50, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
COMMENT: Slander is spoken, liable is in print.
  • Keep this vanity? Now that's is very funny. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:06, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, naturally, but I'll admit I might prefer it to be more paranoid. The neighbors are characters in this one, rather than scary, invisible entities, and that may be why it reads like slandanity (libelanity?). It might be better if it held more to the theme of how you can live in a neighborhood for years and years and never really know anything about your neighbors, but then again, it might lose something that way, too. Interesting problem. --Some user 14:28, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure. Sorry to appear ambiguous, but this needs something done to it, although I'm currently at a loss as to exactly what. Certainly in its current form it's far too 'chatty' to be encyclopedic, and I agree with Flam that it's esoteric and weird; however, it's not beyond redemption in my opinion. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 14:46, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • 0_o... for once, I'm speechless. I'm with Codeine on this one; it's funny (I know people like this, and it's spot on,) but not "there" yet. This reads less like an encyclopedia entry, and more like a standup routine. I hope someone feels up to cleaning this one up and making it fit the theme of Uncyclopedia. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:05, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Could be better, maybe I'll think of some stuff to add to it.
  • Delete, or somebody make it uncyclopedia material... NO, NOT ME, I DON'T WRITE ABOUT THIS STUFF.--Steve666 23:09, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep since it's apparently up to vote now. --Giant Hogweed 01:29, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Give peace a chance. Hurr hurr. --Abbot Vesuvius 8:43 PM EST Feb 27 2006

</s>

KEPT --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Rat Ape Theory

  • Make it Walk the plank. --PiratehattieCap'n SimzorzAr, Matey!17:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Aye, feed it to the sharks.--Winston 19:59, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Shiver me timbers that's gotta go. --Dr. Pepper 12:22, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ----OEJ 22:18, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Cyberpope

  • Comment: Normally, I would NRV this and be done but I don't want the author to think that I'm out to get him and I want him to have a chance to try to explain why these shouldn't be insta-huffed. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 20:00, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Ew, Stanky.--Jtaylor1 23:32, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Exterminate. While I respect Gwax's concern over not wanting to persecute the author, shit is still shit, and this article's composed of nothing else. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:38, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • NRV--Jtaylor1Small Egg 06:22, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Metal Festival

  • Comment: Normally, I would NRV this and be done but I don't want the author to think that I'm out to get him and I want him to have a chance to try to explain why these shouldn't be insta-huffed. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill --PiratehattieCap'n SimzorzAr, Matey!17:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 20:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Condemn to support touring hair-metal bands for an eternity. --Giant Hogweed 05:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Stabbyripdiedie

  • Comment: Normally, I would NRV this and be done but I don't want the author to think that I'm out to get him and I want him to have a chance to try to explain why these shouldn't be insta-huffed. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

MC Shadowtiger

  • Comment: Normally, I would NRV this and be done but I don't want the author to think that I'm out to get him and I want him to have a chance to try to explain why these shouldn't be insta-huffed. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill --PiratehattieCap'n SimzorzAr, Matey!17:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 20:03, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Woop. It has a few glances of being potential funny, so either it needs a long nights sleep or instant destruction. --Dr. Pepper 12:35, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - NNP --Jtaylor1 23:44, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Metal-Heart

  • Comment: Normally, I would NRV this and be done but I don't want the author to think that I'm out to get him and I want him to have a chance to try to explain why these shouldn't be insta-huffed. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Happy pills

  • Comment: Normally, I would NRV this and be done but I don't want the author to think that I'm out to get him and I want him to have a chance to try to explain why these shouldn't be insta-huffed. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Getting laid

  • Guillotineicon"to the Guillotine!" shouts His Royal Majesty, "for the crime of worthlessness and constant vandalization (if that can even be applied to a page that is mostly grafitti anyhow)."
--CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 14:57, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 15:09, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Insignificant subject --Dr. Pepper 12:46, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Giant Hogweed 05:17, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

REDIRECTED to How To ...Get Laid. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:24, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

The Order of The Clown

  • Lose it--Count of Monkey Crisco 12:28, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The Order has a bad odor.----OEJ 13:07, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 14:13, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • The GuillotineiconGuillotine is His Majesty's recommendation as to the appropriate sentencing for this defilement.
--CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 15:00, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Potential this article has, but too much crap it contains. Destroyed it must be --Dr. Pepper 12:31, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Giant Hogweed 05:12, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't care about clowns.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 08:55, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

World of warcraft

REDIRECTED --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 13:11, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Keebler Rebellion

  • Delete - Not funny--Jtaylor1 16:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Save--CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 16:35, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Save - It's drier than the average Uncyclopedia article, but that makes the subject matter funnier, imho. --Iritscen 18:02, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. The red link count is awful, but the writing isn't.--Winston 14:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Some of the red links are redundant, and many could be rerouted to the Human rights article. --Giant Hogweed 05:11, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

KEPT --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Ilumnaughty

  • Redirect to Illuminati: It's too big for me to do it in one swell foop, so I thought that I'd put it here to see if people felt it had content worth saving. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:33, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
  • His Majesty seconds the Redirect. --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS  16:46, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect sounds fine - nothing save-worthy here (the title is missing an 'i' anyway!) --Iritscen 18:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete content and convert to a redirect.--Winston 14:17, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge - No Redirect.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 18:01, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect. --Giant Hogweed 05:04, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

REDIRECTED --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:25, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Super Smash Bros.

Pitiful, and unsalvageable. Merely restates fact, and assumes that mentioning celebrities is funny (like ha ha, you can unlock Michael Jackson by beating Story Mode as Pikachu in under 25 minutes).--Ryoske 05:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Friggin' Kill It! This just blows. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Smash-attack this article out of the arena. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 18:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Zapperooski. - Sorry, I just had to use that term at least once.  c • > • cunwapquc? 00:11, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • SSB deserves its own page, but not this pitiful pile of poo. Falcon Punch it to its doom.

It's very poor form to vote on a page that hasn't actually been tagged for VFD; so doing prevents people that might want the article saved from being included in the disucssion unless they troll VFD. If an article is here but not tagged, you should tag it before you vote. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 13:15, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Sorry.--Ryoske 23:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Guillotineicon"to the Guillotine!" shouts His Royal Majesty, "for the crime of formulaic construction joined with shortness, too much fact, and disjointedness."

--CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 17:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep- I am a Smash Bros. fan and this article needs some more game characters--Jtaylor1 23:28, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 14:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Pro. Or is it Contra? Arh, screw that. DELETE was what I meant to say --Dr. Pepper 12:25, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't understand why what seems to be a straight-up game fan article belongs on a satire site. Maybe I'm missing something, but this seems to be mostly a crapped-down version of the Wikipedia article...not a spoof of it.----OEJ 22:32, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Hammer. SSB is great and all, but that doesn't change the fact that this article is pointless and unfunny. --Zyrac 17:46, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Making up Family Guy quotes

Don't care: the funny thing about it is supposed to be that all the quotes are actually from the simpsons ... but since I don't watch either show I just don't get it at all. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 23:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Zombie Jane

  • Guillotineicon"to the Guillotine!" shouts His Royal Majesty, "for the crime of ignorance regarding proper wiki formatting."

CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown08:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. - Not to mention ignorance of the fact that material posted here is supposed to be funny in some way. --Some user 17:38, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Not formatted well, too many red links, no pictures. But the page is only 2 days old. Was the author planning on coming back and correcting his mistakes? If not, vaporize it. --Big Brother 1984 01:27, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Tragically, irredeemably stupid. Kill it. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:35, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Thom Yorke

  • Guillotineicon"to the Guillotine!" shouts His Royal Majesty, "for the crime of ignoring wiki format and shortness."

CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown

  • Keep, but IMHO we still need some means of incentivizing experienced contributors to clean up and/or rewrite articles about pop musicians and other contemporary cultural figures. This is a good example... I think I'll make that my next "Urban Renewal" project. --Some user 17:43, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: it's completely off-base in a not very funny way. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 12:57, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

NRVed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:03, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Making up Oscar Wilde quotes

  • What happened to this article? It used to be funny. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 23:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
  • How about, as opposed to deletion, we get someone to clean up the aforementioned mess?--ShroomsShroom!Gay2Sir Flammable KUN Prince%21.gif (Na Naaaaa...)Gay2Shroom!Shroomirror 08:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • It's on my to-do list, and I've done a little work on it already (such as the "Oscar by the Sea" image), but I'll admit, the threat of the whole batch of these things being deleted all at once has reduced my enthusiasm somewhat. Btw, Flammable, I notice you haven't (yet) posted any votes on the ones listed below...?  c • > • cunwapquc? 14:34, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't delete, but will anyone really understand how to make Wilde quotes? --TimeStopper 22:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • If you're referring to the fact that a large portion of the Wilde quotes on this site involve some reference to buggery, and have about as much wit and humor value as what's currently in Making up Star Trek quotes, then the situation looks rather grave, I fear.
Anyway, can we remove this VFD entry? I'd assume Nerd wasn't being entirely serious in putting it here, and lately I've taken a dislike to dilatory VF-whatever entries in general. Call me a killjoy, but I'm tired of seeing 'em. (And Nerd, just be glad I didn't list HowTo:Refer to Yourself in the Third Person here... easily the worst of them all!) --Some user 22:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: No, let's not just remove it from VFD, I'd actually like to address this matter. This page contains, so far as I can tell, roughly zero actual content. There isn't anything that actually addresses the matter of making up Oscar Wilde quotes; all it is is a long list of fake quotes. The good quotes should be added to Wilde and the page itself should be deleted. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Well, okay... I guess I see three problems. I agree that whatever decent content there may once have been has been diluted now to the point of absurdity, but who decides which quotes to keep? That's certainly not a job I want (though I was resigned to trying it eventually anyway, and at least getting rid of some of the blatantly terrible ones). The second problem is the same one I think we're seeing with some of the other quotes pages listed here now: Too many established users have added quotes to this page, and whether they're good or bad, those same users will probably vote to keep it for that reason. The third problem is that this is probably the single most-cited and most-linked-to Uncyclopedia article on outside websites, at a time when you can't get a Google hit on Uncyclopedia to save your life... So while I'm completely sympathetic to what you're saying, I just think putting this page up for VFD is a futile gesture that could easily backfire. I think it's very likely to survive a vote here, and that will only make it more difficult to even clean up, much less delete entirely, later on. I'm still willing to try to clean it up, but let's face it, I've already done nine of these things, and nobody has even said "thank you." And in this case, one "super-revert" could undo literally days of work! It seems pretty clear to me now that taking on this project was a fairly serious miscalculation on my part, and if I'd known then what I know now, I absolutely wouldn't have bothered. --Some user 17:09, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
I'd go the route of writing an actual article about how to make up Oscar Wilde quotes and use as few examples as possible, then include a linke to Wilde, where people can see more examples. That way the page will have genuine content instead of being a giant pile of crap. Go ahead, delete tons of stuff and if anyone gives you a hard time, let me know and I'll use my admin clout to yell at them. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Further discussion at User_talk:gwax

Actually I just nominated it for VFD because I was interested to see what discussion it would incite. And I think Oscar Wilde is gay. (both literally and figuratively) --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 20:40, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

There's a place for that, It's called the dump.--ShroomsShroom!Gay2Sir Flammable KUN Prince%21.gif (Na Naaaaa...)Gay2Shroom!Shroomirror 20:47, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Well ... I also sort of wanted to delete the page. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 20:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Making up Thomas Jefferson quotes

  • Keep It has a chuckle or two, and the author obviously put some time into it --Mrspikersworth 03:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -  c • > • cunwapquc? 16:48, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep What's the hurry to delete stuff? Are the servers running our of space? --Big Brother 1984 10:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment I - See the previous discussion, in case you missed it. The idea is to delete this handful of them now, in order to hopefully satisfy the "off with their heads" ardor of some admins who would just as soon delete all of them at once without a vote. --Some user 14:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment II - Now, come on, PP, one harmless little suggestion about possibly exposing your role in the Enron/Osama bin Laden/Elton John conspiracy does not constitute "blackmail" !! Jeez, next thing ya know I'll be accused of having started the whole Danish newspaper-cartoon controversy just because I personally drew all those stupid cartoons. --Some user 00:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Consider this to be just such an accusation! --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:12, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
I can never tell when people are joking. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 23:33, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Hey, this is Uncyclopedia. Go figure. --Dr. Pepper 18:46, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Mildly funny with overreliance on slavery jokes. --Giant Hogweed 05:00, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Though I agree with the Giant Hogweed: Yes, the Liberty hero with slaves thing is funny, but comon, there has to be more there... Jefferson is such an overused source of quotes.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 19:02, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment III - When I first put this up for VFD, there were three fewer slavery-related quotes than there are now; those were added by Prettiestpretty, and they are an improvement. But all of them could be (and for the most part, have been) rolled into Thomas Jefferson without upsetting the tone of that article, unlike the Matrix or Sun-Tzu quotes which probably would upset the tone of those respective articles, at least as they stand now. My point is that this article is mostly superfluous. <soapbox>Maybe there is more that can be done with Jefferson and I'm just unable to come up with it, but if we want highly participatory quotes pages, we should set them up for people like (I dunno) Bill Gates, Dick Cheney, Sherlock Holmes, Confucius, and Satan, maybe. Jefferson just isn't enough of a target, and in my opinion that's why nobody added a single quote to the page for four months prior to it showing up here. If we keep it, will it be another four months?</soapbox> --Some user 19:23, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
I would like to see places for the making up of quotes for all those people. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 20:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Making up Star Trek quotes

Making up Matrix quotes

  • Delete -  c • > • cunwapquc? 16:48, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Rataube 18:31, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Funny. --DeathByPie 07:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. One of the few funny "quotes by" pages.----OEJ 00:45, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Agreed, this is actually very funny.--Chris0132 01:56, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Free your mind. The version of the page that was nominated for deletion was actually a vandalised version of the page. I did a SUPER REVERT.
“Bad edits are a system, some user, and that system is our enemy. When you look at them, what do you see? A crappy page worthy of deletion. Freeze it! Look now ...”
--Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 04:38, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Okay, but if you're going to revert changes to the article, try to remember to keep the VFD tag on it, okay? (The reverted version is worse, by the way... No offense. I might also point out that most of the changes you reverted were Mhaille's. So I guess that makes him a "vandal," eh?) --Some user 05:05, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, it was more of a combination of bad edits than vandalism. wrong terminology sorry --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 05:17, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Making up Sun-Tzu quotes

  • Delete -  c • > • cunwapquc? 16:48, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. 'Tis funny. --DeathByPie 07:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Sun Tzu rocks. --Big Brother 1984 10:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and your soldiers will win many battles. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 04:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep It ain't bad, it could use a little more substance but its pretty good nonetheless.--Yoshi blade 04:57, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Sun Tzu rocks...but this page sucks. keep some good ones put them elsewhere. -- – Mahroww a.k.a. Hard Wick Fondles Buggies III  05:01, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ~ T. (talk) 06:38, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Keithhackworth MUN 15:52, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. --Dr. Pepper 12:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Needs more quotes. --Giant Hogweed 04:45, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Sun Tsu on fire is AWESOME.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 19:06, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

A double Whammy!

  1. Ignas I.V.
  2. "Egivela"
  • Flush Them Two inter-related articles, both of which suck muchly. No Effort, Nor formatting, no purpose. -- User:TD blabber

NRVed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

The Magic Schoolbus

  • Gobshite Someone tried, but not hard enough. -- User:TD blabber
  • Yuck. Still, at least the midwest gets destroyed, so maybe it's a "weak yuck." --Some user 18:20, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Unleash the dingos. --Giant Hogweed 01:51, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Maradona

  • For crying out loud. One of the greatest footballers in history, and this piece of crap is our entry for him? I've listed this here on VFD in the hope that someone will instigate a thorough rewriting. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 17:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete first... This is about Diego Maradona? Damn, I thought it was about my High School gym teacher, Floyd Maradona. Rewriters, be sure to include the first name next time for us non-Argentinians. --Some user 18:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • send it to the Bottom of the Ocean. --PiratehattieCap'n SimzorzAr, Matey!21:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Kick it. --Giant Hogweed 01:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Windfall

  • Kill. Smells like vanity, especially with the hideous pictures that have now appeared. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 13:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Murder. Smells like crap. Unsigned --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Can be renovated and improved. Unsigned --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuke: Vanity or not, good lord that article sucks. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh goodness, this one sucks to a sufficient degree to establish an event horizon around itself. (© Algorithm, IRC.) Vaporize. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 16:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Fell it. The external link renders the article obsolete. --Giant Hogweed 17:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Rip it. This page is a mess! Filmcom 17:22, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't even have a clever comment for this one. --Some user 17:41, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Looks like a bunch of losers with too much time on their hands that are jealous of a successful band. And also, did anyone even laugh at any of it? I say ban all those that participated in making it and bringing it upon the world. Morbid Death 18:58, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Stib series: Stib, Template:Stib

I'm of the staunch vbelief that we already have Too Many Goddamn Templates. I think that stib and its buddy are unnecessary.--ShroomsShroom!Gay2Sir Flammable KUN Prince%21.gif (Na Naaaaa...)Gay2Shroom!Shroomirror 19:38, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Sherman Style

  • Complete and utter crap. I'm half tempted to tag it with NRV, but I'm not feeling like that much of a bastard -- User:TD blabber
In the future, please remember to tag pages {{vfd}} when you post them here; it makes my life easier and means that I don't have to invalidate any votes. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:22, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I think you meant QVFD, TD. "NRV" is the mildest form of disparagment one can inflict on an article, as it implies you think it has a chance.
  • Delete. There actually are people on this site (apparently) who think all fart jokes are funny by default, so QVFD might not be entirely appropriate. Tempting, though. --Some user 23:27, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Sonic BOOM it. --Giant Hogweed 23:46, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

WikiHitler

Orange

  • Ugh. --Boy Toy bitch at me 00:53, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete this road apple before another unsuspecting soul trods upon it.--Winston 20:13, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete regretfully. If the author can pull his/her garters up, rely less on pure non-sequiturs and randomness, and construct a Unified Field Article I for one would like to see her/him/it write more.----OEJ 22:15, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Jtaylor1Small Egg 01:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I'm all for an entry on Orange, this, with the exception of the term Oh noble orange, is not the article it. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:31, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Execute, for it violates every part of the Pirate's Code HTBFANJS. --PiratehattieCap'n SimzorzAr, Matey!21:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Juice. --Giant Hogweed 05:53, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Peel it... off the site, that is. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:30, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • It's not much good, but with some improve tags it might work spare it's wretched life--Count of Monkey Crisco 10:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment: BTW, what's this doing alive? I nominated this 3 days ago and it got 8 votes to delete it and 1 to keep it... I've seen pages deleted with much less then that! --Boy Toy bitch at me 18:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

More iDevices

I say delete all of these:

  • IRon - stub, unfunny picture UnNews'd
  • IPod Macro - stub, unfunny (and sort of lazily MS Painted) picture
  • IPod chair - the image is just a chair with an iPod taped to it, and the article... yawn
  • IHolla - don't get it, broken Wilde quote...

Seriously, how many more iPod-related stubs do we need? - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 18:45, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. WTF was that all about? --Dr. Pepper 12:39, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I moved and converted IRon to an UnNews article, but vote to delete the others.--Winston 14:37, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep "iPod chair" and delete the others. And this is just my opinion, but I'd feel better in this case if these were separate VFD entries...? --Some user 05:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
    • If there are people who vote to keep the other two pages, then perhaps it will be best to separate them. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 05:29, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep iChair and I actually get iHolla. Delete iMacro. --Giant Hogweed 05:46, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep' iChair, and delete the rest. ---Consuelos 03:04, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

VOTE SPLIT --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Quantum entanglement

  • Keep. --Giant Hogweed 05:41, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - But it needs work. — WILD WEASEL 14:03, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Burn. This lost me from the opening sentence. "Quantum teleportation of socks from washers and dryers" was the only part of this that came close to being funny (cuz it's true, ya know. I always have an odd number.) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

KEPT --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:05, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects