This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Keep. Normally I am all for dumping stuff like this but this article is at least put together well. Don't see the need to remove it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:49, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. There's some good stuff here hidden behind the angry sarcastic teenager. Could easily be rewritten into a more neutral and funnier tone. If deletion is chosen, I can haz userspace? --Matfen 18:28, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. It needs work, but it's fine, really. At times, it's actually funny. I don't know if I can say that for most features. pillow talk 21:44, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. It isn't such a bad article, needs some attention though. --Chiefjustice3DS 18:12, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. needs a purgicating, but has value. --Mn-z 15:22, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Here's what I know: There's a computer game called Fallout 3 and the author of this article didn't like it. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:38, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I'm sort of on the fence content wise but I think it might be satisfying to delete it just because the author seems a it of a dickpipe. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:59, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain. More than the game, author hates the "clueless...dumb shits" with whom he disagrees. His antagonistic attitude is a burden, but the article might be amusing to people who know that game really well. Spıke¬ 18:54 8-Apr-10
Keep A few chuckles from me, liked it 'though could use a little more polishing and additions. A definite keeper. Aleister in Chains 23:45 14 4 mmx
Delete
*Delete. Abandoned (debatable) and unfunny. --Wilytank 16:24, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Woodburninator knows what he is doing, but as I told the author of the recent UnNews:The Late Report, you shouldn't write in the style of a self-centered pot-head writing about himself, or a left-winger offering crap as fact, or a right-winger offering crap as fact. In each case, there are people out there who would do the same thing in all seriousness, and it's hard to tell joke from reality. Spıke¬ 17:20 14-Apr-10
But sometimes, that is the joke. People that write in that style, which can be mistaken for something a real idiot from the news would say, it is fantastic. That would be the point. This, on the other hand, is just written buy a pissed off guy with a severe case of writers block, as seen in its sister article. WoodyOnFire!Talking WoodyStalking Woody 21:13, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
I disagree. Woody never knows what he's doing. And I feel it necessary to say that writing in such a serious way where one can not tell if it's meant to be a joke or if the person is actually serious about what they say is actually what makes true satire. Sure, maybe it's a good to throw some really outlandish stuff out there so everyone knows you're telling a joke (like how Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh do), but I must say I quite enjoy the completely serious style of satirists such as Stephen Colbert. Blending the line of reality and sarcasm is exactly what great satire is meant to do. That's why I like this. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 21:21, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
Quibble: If "one cannot tell," it isn't satire at all; it's an inside joke that no one else ever gets. Say rather, "one catches on slowly," and increasingly outlandish stuff is the key. My point is that there are populations for which, the more outlandish it gets, the more real it seems to me. Spıke¬ 00:23 15-Apr-10
Yeah, Sycamore mentioned that to me once, and I'm not a fan of it. Like, I'm not dead-set against it, but I really like the idea of someone popping onto Mint Jelly and being like, WTF? and then clicking on the link at the end of the article and figuring it out. If anyone else ever wants to write a different Mint Jelly article, (which I currently doubt) then obviously this one should be moved. But until then, I (biasedly) see no harm in this. WoodyOnFire!Talking WoodyStalking Woody 22:09, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
No problem here. Keepated. --UU - natter09:13, Apr 15
Delete. We seem to be getting quite a few military articles these days. Some of 'em are OK. But this one was started and abandoned. It isn't funny, and it doesn't look like it's gonna get funny. So let's get rid. --UU - natter14:36, Apr 14
Delete. Yup, only four edits by I.P.Anon on one day a month and a half ago. Must have gotten deployed. Spıke¬ 14:44 14-Apr-10
Classically unfunny. For starters, four quotations, all from generic random people, not because anything notable was ever said that could be adapted, but just to fit some preconceived format. Then encyclopedia clichés: Second sentence asserts, "Nobody knows...and there are multiple theories." Everything else is listcruft. Spıke¬ 10:17 14-Apr-10
From the Poopsmith Lounge"I did not laugh once --Killerdaniel 17:32, April 11, 2010 (UTC)" I took a glance at it, and I am inclined to agree with Killerdaniel, so let's kerkill this bitch! Who's with me!? MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 22:24, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I once owned an IMSAI, which is like the Altair, pre-v1.2. That's apropos of nothing, because this article is not apropos of the Altair, or anything else. POTR graciously gives people a chance to rewrite it, but there is no point to doing so. Spıke¬ 23:51 11-Apr-10
Delete. For a minute, you wonder if this is going to be OK. Then you actually read it. --UU - natter13:02, Apr 13
Delete. Has irritated me since I joined here. --Matfen 21:58, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. What UU said. --Chiefjustice3DS 18:08, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
I don't think it's irredeemable, but I'm not inclined to do the rewrite needed to redeem it. As is, Delete., but I'll give people time to see if anyone wants to tackle it. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009Sunday, 22:30, Apr 11 2010 UTC
Delete. Older versions are better, but not terribly good. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:52, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. I find it quite hard to understand that an admin forgets to put the VFD tag on a VFD article he nominated. I'm sorry about continuously bringing this up, but if the article in question votes to be deleted and gets kept because someone forgot the tag it's all for nothing. --Wilytank 22:27, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
Weak Delete. I could be just as happy without this article. If someone cleans it up I'll change my vote, but I really can't be moved to do so myself. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 03:41, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Pelargonium deleted a large chunk of Dildo Humor and listcruft regarding Viking gods, and it is within sight of borderline acceptability, though it will take a thorough copy-edit. 00:24 4-Apr-10 PS--After five passes of fighting pompous, gassy prose as a prerequisite to organizing it, as a prerequisite to making it funny, I am despairing and about to flip to Delete. I now have nothing funny I want to say about Vikings, nor does the article. Spıke¬ 16:36 4-Apr-10
Fortunately, Happytimes has now added actual humor. Spıke¬ 12:51 6-Apr-10
Keep. Grammar needs to be fixed and broken links deleted, but really shouldn't be deleted. --Wilytank 11:41, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
Strong Keep! Í dídn't thínk ít wás töö bád by the tímé Í göt tö ít... nöw thát Í've édíted ít söme Í thínk ít hás réál pöténtíál. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*(talk)(stalk)Π ~ ~ 06 Apr 2010 ~ 05:18 (UTC)
Mild Keep. Fuck the list and get rid of the lamer jokes and cruft and it'll be presentable. There's still some good content hidden in there. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:59, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
Delete
I attempted to clean this up, but it's just too much...so Delete and start over. --Paizu • Maj. • JStw • MUN • LOB • Crap • WHORE • (Talk) 18:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I'm with Pel on this one, we just need to start over and try again. -- Skinfan1312:34 EST 4 April, 2010
Comments
Comment. The idea needs work. This is a work where I guess the original author has gone and since then lots of extra rubbish was piled on top. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:31, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
I was about to contact you, as you are the go-to guy for suggesting new directions for an article at a dead end. Spıke¬ 17:39 4-Apr-10
Another article to operate on. Ok, face mask,gas and hammer...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:26, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Someone with a sense of humour has been here, along with someone with a sense of mistrang. If we were to hooverlump the mistrang and weezle the foremonk, then there might be something decent left behind. Keep as it is redeemable, and there are a few lines in there I would love to steal. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009Tuesday, 22:03, Apr 6 2010 UTC
The last time I weezled the foremonk was during a yacht race. Spıke¬ 02:29 8-Apr-10
Keep: 50% good and 50% bad means 100% keep baby. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:07, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Badly structured towncruft article. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:35, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
Comment. It lapses into Randumbo but might be recoverable. It's a pretty dull place and the photo is of retiring M.P. there Anne Widdicombe. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:23, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
Keep I look like that drawing. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:29, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
Wasn't something like this just in the UnNews funnies (labeled George W. Bush)? Spıke¬ 20:36 8-Apr-10
This page is a sub-page of HowTo:_Hide_a_Dead_Hooker and is accessed by clicking 'Yes' on the bit with the penguins. So if it's deleted then the main article would have to be modified which would take absolutely...no time at all...what's my argument?? mAttlobster. (hello) 20:40, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
Quite funny In context of the main article, it's fine. Also, it is linked in the main article, Wily... And if we delete this, then it'll open the floodgates and drive everyone to want to delete all subpages. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 20:52, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Failed attempt at intelligence. --Wilytank 20:25, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Insults the reader without performing humor or even cleverness. If unreferenced by the main article, it's got no reason to survive. Perhaps even if referenced. Spıke¬ 20:36 8-Apr-10Rescinded. Okay in context. Spıke¬ 10:29 9-Apr-10
Keep for the hell of it I say let's put a banner headline over it using Monkey's quote "It's like being waterboarded with memes", because it crosses the line of "So bad it's good" imnho. The name and the pics are what save it for me, they are so UnPerfect that it works with stupid memes and language. Twenty thumbs up! Feature! Vote for Good! Huh? Aleister des chains 00:39 11 4 mmx
Weak keep it's actually pretty adequately written, though admittedly overly memey. —Pelozurian (talk) 00:56, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Short 'n' shit gamecruft that should have seen an ICU tag but didn't. Get rid. --UU - natter14:26, Apr 13
Delete. The sad thing is, if the submitter put in a WIP tag, it would have expired by now. --Wilytank 15:57, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
Not worth keeping around. pillow talk 17:39, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
What's not to like? Fits on the screen, has a template warning you not to change a thing, and "it's friendly enough for kids to masterbate [sic] to." Spıke¬ 18:04 13-Apr-10
Keep It just needs a little help, and who else is going to write an article about Ede? And Keep in an attempt to save the soul of a user who has turned quickly to the dark side of Uncy after winning a cruft battle of their own. Who will stand and fight for Ede by my side? We are the few, but you will tell your children that you were here, this day, this April fools day. May God be on our side. Al en'chain 00:40 1 4
Keep. What Al just said inspired me, and so I have turned. I WILL FIGHT BY YOUR SIDE! Loopygrumpkins 22:55, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Here's a sword, my third best one, now you stay here and defend yourself against the 10,000 as I go, ON VACATION! Yay! See you next week. Al in chains 17:49 2 4 mmx
Delete
Delete. It's unfunny article about a town that no one has ever heard of. Loopygrumpkins 21:28, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Retarded! Inbred! But enough about the humor; let's discuss the residents! Spıke¬ 21:46 30-Mar-10
Delete. Towncruft --Wilytank 13:09, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
Delete It's time for TOP OF THE POPS!!! mAttlobster. (hello) 17:42, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Standard rubbishing article about a place no one has heard of. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:44, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete It's just... boring. No pizazz, no chutzpah, no nuthin'. 2K12_DAN.VRS 04:57, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Took you, what? a week? to go from writing school-cruft to teeing some up for deletion (Section 5 of Ede)! Spıke¬ 21:46 30-Mar-10
I know! You'd think he would have learned what it's like to put blood, sweat, and urine into a page and then have to fight for its survival. I don't know, it makes me lose my hope in mankind. Al en'chains 00:20 1 4 mmx
Delete.All that remaind of his mortal soul was his walking staff and his left arm to which he had no use for now, for now he had been transformed into a giant figure made of pure taquitos. He now holds the earth in one hand, and a bowl of blue kool-aid in the other. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:18, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Patent nonsense. —Pelozurian (talk) 21:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Kerkill Stupid, borderline vanity, and I can't believe it lived through V-Week. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 21:38, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Nothing borderline about it. This eighth-grade attempt to force paragraphs to fit around the meme for chewing-sounds was indeed done by eighth-graders, who all but sign it in Section 5. Spıke¬ 00:31 12-Apr-10
Delete.Hey let me write about my favorite British rock band on Uncyclo... Whoops, I'm out of relevant content already. I better keep writing till I fill the page up. Derp duh derp buhbuhbuh fart! --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:23, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. and redirect to Cluck which is, save one sentence, completely the same fucking article! --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:11, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
Delete the other one as this one has a longer change history. Spıke¬ 19:32 4-Apr-10
Delete. per SPIKE -- Skinfan1319:46 EST 4 April,2010
Delete. Chicken feed. 2K12_DAN.VRS 04:53, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. Of course, it's not like we need cluck that badly. It's a just a derivative AAAAAAAA, right?--Count of Monkey Crisco 19:11, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
Kerkill I use to play Neopets and this seriously seems like the actual calendar on the site. Nothing funny here. Why this wasn't put on QVFD when it was first made is beyond me... MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 02:48, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Obliterate for great justice. -- Skinfan1312:17 EST 9 April, 2010
Obliterate. Nobody cares about Neopets anymore. --Wilytank 16:19, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Obliterate. Seriously. Joefoxon 18:35, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Obliterate. If this is anything other than a direct lift (whether with or without changes), it explains itself even worse than Wilytank complained about for Suha Arafat below. Spıke¬ 20:32 9-Apr-10
Obliterate. - I stumbled on this a few years ago, yet I was too lazy to see if there was an actual joke behind it. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 21:00, Apr. 9, 2010
Obliterate. Worse than Wednesdays. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:43, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Bandwagon Obliterate Cuz everyone else is doing it —Pelozurian (talk) 06:59, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
There's a mess of articles in VFD limbo but everyone votes here. This beat the dead horse mentality is why UNCYCLOPEDIA IS THE WORST! --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:17, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
But look at how Uncyclopedia has united against this one article. Nothing like it has ever happened before. It's a beautiful sight. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 21:58, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. A bunch of kids a my school worship Kobe. If I showed them this, they'd probably cry. --Wilytank 23:28, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Kobe, just signed to a new contract, is a walking rape joke, but his Uncyclopedia article should be more than one. This article doesn't have sections, but episodes, and they are virtually all rape jokes. The "trading card" photo with Lakers shooped into Rapers is great, but it will live on in the adequate Los Angeles Lakers. Spıke¬ 23:31 10-Apr-10
Delete. This was nominated before but somebody forgot the tag. We've waited a few weeks, lets do it right this time. --Wilytank 16:01, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Wut I said last time (after flipping): "'Fixable' would require rewriting, start-to-finish. And for what?" (Also, Jupiterfox liked it.) Spıke¬ 20:35 9-Apr-10
Delete. Doesn't say much about who this person really is. --Wilytank 14:55, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. The article has big conceptual problems, but the above isn't one of them; it adequately identifies Yasser Arafat's widow, for whom much foreign aid and tax revenue for the Palestinian Cause allegedly funded shopping sprees. But the article is halfway between first-person and encyclopedia-writer point-of-view (though nagging the reader). The point, morphing Suha into the Nigerians always trying to scam American bank customers, could have been done simply from the usual POV. I may be biased by lack of photos and horrible editing. Spıke¬ 15:14 8-Apr-10
Delete. Interesting that the author chose to target Suha Arafat for this spoof letter. Otherwise it can go as I can't see anyone improving/adding photos etc for someone who can hardly is much of a public figure these days. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:56, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
It's definitely not presented in a way that any one who never heard of this person (i.e. me) any idea of who this person is. All it has is the letter. --Wilytank 18:55, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Loopygrumpkins first contemplated VFD'ing this, thinking it was vanity. RabbiTechno slapped {{ICU}} on it, thinking it was cyber-bullying and encouraging the author to QVFD it, which she did; bounced by the Chief Justice, as it bore an ICU. Which expires today. We now know that Anne is a character from Little Britain (which has a wiki on Wikia), as the article itself notes, and all our initial suspicions were mistaken. Only one thing: The article is still crap. Spıke¬ 02:35 8-Apr-10
Delete. Parody of an existing comedy generally doesn't work, as it's often a regurgitation of the original. This is an article based around an in-joke in an existing comedy show that is predominantly character based comedy. If every word in this article was changed to eh-eh-eh, it would have about the same humour content, and then be derivative of AAAAAAAAA!. Put it out of my misery. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009Thursday, 02:43, Apr 8 2010 UTC
Delete. Writing about a character from a TV programme isn't necessarily a bad idea as such but to make like this work, the article would have to be of the highest quality. This one doesn't cut the mustard. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:13, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
Kerkill Though it was a waste of time to bring it here for it would have fallen victim to it's own ICU tag had it not, I do think we need to hurry up and get rid of it. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 19:07, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Was going to put it up myself, but SPIKE beat me to it. Loopygrumpkins 02:35, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Hmm... The ICU was going to expire? That was until you edited to add the VFD tag to it, no? And your edit extended the life of the ICU for another week? Why couldn't you just wait for an admin to delete it when the ICU expired, Spike? WHY?!? MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 03:31, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
I don't think adding VFD is "development" that extends the life of the ICU. You might be right that the article would have been deleted anyway, in which case I'm sorry if it wastes your time. Enough people were looking at this that it merited a deliberate push off the cliff. Spıke¬ 03:46 8-Apr-10
Any edit to an ICU'd article extends the life of the ICU tag. Had you not editted it, the admins would have seen it had expired and would have already huffed it. It really shouldn't have been added to VFD for that reason. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 19:07, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
What Dex said. I'm tempted to take both tags off and leave this article standing to make a point, but I won't. But DON'T VFD ICU'd articles, the admins will take care of those. Eventually. --UU - natter12:58, Apr 9
Comment. Whitney Houston in hospital at the start of a European tour. Perhaps this can be reworked? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:30, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Again with the chickens. Mostly lists, wibble and Star Wars. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:30, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Once again, nonsense numbers in the intro set the tone. Spıke¬ 09:51 5-Apr-10
Delete. Since the author writes Chcikenmen without correction then it's fair to say this is an article that was belched out one go. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:31, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
Obliterate. I'm baffled to see the (however few) articles the submitter thinks exists from the broken links. "Penisatic era"? WTF is wrong with him? --Wilytank 15:17, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Combo delete from Chicken man. Concept free, low on content and Googles almost exclusively back to Uncyclopedia.--Count of Monkey Crisco 06:26, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. "In conclusion, there is no conclusion. Or is there?" Spıke¬ 09:45 5-Apr-10
EXTERMINATE! It literally stops being aesthetically unpleasing and just becomes an insult to intelligence. --Wilytank 21:07, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I recently stumbled upon this page. we have an article on Nation already (although that one isn't very good either), but this is just nonsense that isn't funny. This page needs to go. -- Skinfan1312:42 EST 4 April, 2010
Delete. Most likely vanity ending with a come-on to join them on some gaming site. Spıke¬ 16:48 4-Apr-10
Delete. If you add the word "fag" in random spots it's an ED message board drama chronicle. Even if it was funny I could never forgive it for expecting people to write articles about individual members of the damn player community. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:25, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. "It is with a heavy heart that I must tell you that the author of this article has died of boredom" (from Section 6). This reader is in critical condition, after a classic case of inventing an entity and rambling on and on about it. Spıke¬ 22:50 29-Mar-10
Keep. Half of this is a decent article about a real company. The other half....Well, there seem to be a lot of disgruntled ex-employees. Spıke¬ 22:46 29-Mar-10
The other half is now deleted and the article is copy-edited. Spıke¬ 23:26 29-Mar-10
Keep. (formerly Delete) Rewritten, barely keepable. Not that we need a page on every foreign holiday in the non-English-speaking world. Still needs a photo.Spıke¬ 22:38 29-Mar, 12:49 30-Mar-10
Keep Has potential and brings up the old division between Belgium and the Netherlands. Perhaps Socky could help as I think he's from Belgium as well. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:46, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. per fixication. --Mn-z 13:49, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
Note, Mn-z has also attached {{Stub}}, which means y'all are still invited to come and help. Spıke¬ 14:07 5-Apr-10
Delete
Delete. Started out good, then WTF? --Wilytank 21:43, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I'll fix the English. I suspect it will still be an ugly orphan. Spıke¬ 22:01 29-Mar-10
Delete. Unsurprisingly, the holiday has nothing to do with Dutch/Belgian relations. Basically, there is nothing in the article worth saving, everything of value is an obvious joke that anyone who read wikipedia' article on the subject could make up in 10 minutes.. Everything that is "original" is the article is random. --Mn-z 14:53, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
Give me some respect! after post-edits and reorg'ing the randomness last, it was more like 25 minutes. Spıke¬ 17:58 1-Apr-10
Comments
This was put through VFD already in 2007. I don't see any improvement. --Wilytank 21:43, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Yes, last time it was a doleful VFD nomination, two votes in favor with hopes for a guiding hand, and none such in three years. Spıke¬ 22:01 29-Mar-10
I'm withdrawing my vote seeing the cleanup. Sometimes that doesn't happen until an article is put through VFD. --Wilytank 16:52, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
Kept. If only for the reason I get to enjoy Koninginnedag in Amsterdam and you don't. ~ 21:02, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
Surprisingly Keep. It's very localised humour - to get into it in any way you'd need to know who the hell Barnaby Joyce is. It needs rewriting, but it has as much value as anything which is UC-centric or UK-centric. User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sigheilMonday, 09:30, Mar 29 2010 UTC
Keep. per it being acceptable colony-cruft. --Mn-z 14:40, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
Keep; and I like the phrase 'colony-cruft'. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:44, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. found this while searching uncategorized pages, reverted recent vandalism to find it wasn't very funny or coherent to begin with. --Mn-z 17:04, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Barnaby Joyce is a Senator in Australia--not a take-off of US TV detective Barnaby Jones. But that doesn't matter, as this is four paragraphs of rambling about nothing, only briefly mentioning the Senate in the final sentence. Why? Spıke¬ 18:54 27-Mar-10Rescinded. So the "jellyfish" digression is not random but a joke about his irresolute stance in Parliament? Okay. Spıke¬ 16:31 29-Mar-10
Delete. Does the writer think this is Australian UnCyclopedia? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:48, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. There are no problems with the actual content of the article as far as I know. Just to put it out there: I came up with "CADMIUM!" on my own to serve as a joke on the article. It has nothing to do with anything actually going on in the school as far as I know.Loopygrumpkins 01:06, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. As mentioned by Loopygrumpkins, there are no problems with the actual content and I had never heard of "CADMIUM!" until I read the latest version. As Spike has pointed out oh-so-kindly to us, we are competent writers, good at coding an article, and have read HTBFANJS. It sounds like with those combined, it should be a great article--and I think the humor in it is funny no matter if you go to the school or not. Some content is based on the fact, but other information, since few would know, is made up but still hilarious. I would see no reason to delete it just because Spike advised us that articles such as these end up on this list. Billobob 03:08, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
Keep But you kids, one of you at least take some control of the page and make sure that there are no real names used of any person, that nothing on the page demeans anyone at your school, and, well, you can guess the rest. Fuck up on this task and your page will getting huffed, for sure, if it doesn't get huffed by VFD. All that said, nice work on the article, it's a very full piece. Please consider adding to other pages or writing on a new topic. Aleister in Chains 3:49 26 3 mmx
Keep. It's specific but it's not bad. UN:CM is a guideline that we can show to noobs to explain why their arbicle about their best friend Jake was deleted. The actual rules, however, allow articles as long as they're (a) funny and (b) not abusive. This manages to be mildly amusing, despite the fact that I can't tell this school from a hole in the ground. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 02:41, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. I have no issues with it. Googlyphil 16:42, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. These two kids are competent writers, good at coding an article, and one has even read UN:HTBFANJS. But I've advised them, on the article's talk page, that articles such as this one about their middle school in Cedarburg, Wisconsin inevitably wind up on VFD. They went away for two weeks, but one is now back--seems that someone at school has grown fond of the exclamation, CADMIUM!--the latest of many inside jokes to be preserved for posterity. Spıke¬ 00:35 26-Mar-10
Delete.UN:CM - if the article were changed to be about a semi-fictional school, or as a reflection on school in general, it would be worth a weak keep, but it needs funnying up as well. User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sigheilFriday, 06:55, Mar 26 2010 UTC
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 07:10, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity I am afraid. It is also one of those articles that will be impossible to improve/edit as only the authors know where the jokes lie buried. It also has some classic randumbo to boot:Webster Transitional School was established as a school for Nazi Zombies in 1944, in an attempt by Hitler to take over the United States of America from the inside. Crap copybook standard for this type of thing. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:52, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
uh i don't really care uh huh huh huh huh huh --Roman Dog Bird 16:01, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
Weak delete. Well written at least, and I think the two writers should go write something that isn't vanity.—Sir¬_¬ |BanterHOMOPHOBE!!!NOTM 06:12, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Per Romartus, he hits the nail on the head in my opinion. --Chiefjustice3DS 21:51, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
I propose instead of condemning this article to deletion, some of the people who want to see it deleted should try to improve it first. I believe that if people who know nothing about the school at all contributed to the article, it could be funnier because other editors may not have the bias that Billobob or myself have. For more, see the "Deletion" section of Webster Transitional School's discussion page. Loopygrumpkins 17:29, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
How can we possibly write about something that we don't know about? It would be just randumb nonsense. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 02:44, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
I do that all the time - but why would I rewrite this when I don't think it has a lot of promise to begin with? User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sigheilSaturday, 07:36, Mar 27 2010 UTC
I've done a good editing and some rewrite of most sections, more to go. Not a bad article at all, and maybe even a VFG page in its future. Al en'chain 13:45 28 3 mmx
I don't mean to seem whiny, but could people please stop suggesting that I work on something else. I take great offense at that seeing as in the two months and four days since I first edited, I've majorly edited (as in practically rewritten) five articles, not including this one which is being considered for deletion. I've also created three other articles and made quite a few smaller edits to sections on many other pages. Since I don't spend every waking second of my life on this website, I wouldn't consider that focusing solely on one topic. Loopygrumpkins 18:25, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
Four paragraphs up, you had no trouble telling all the article's detractors what we should work on. But all the editing help Aleister can give will not make this an article of general interest. It will remain an article about a middle school that has jocks, nerds, gamers, and a seemingly dictatorial administration, as though it were the only one. Users are directing you to useful work to extend hospitality to you--and are getting drama in return. Spıke¬ 23:34 28-Mar-10
Spike, seriously, just because you happened to stumble upon our article DOES NOT mean you have any kind of authority over it. Really, we already spent our time on it, and it seems your only argument is that it is something that few people will care about. Well, take a look at the schools category on here, and go complain about EVERY SINGLE random page about a school. Billobob 02:13, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Uh, he never said he had authority over it. He's a vigilant user who reported it to VFD for being vanity. As I said on the talk page, you're lucky, some might have QVFD'd it. And thanks for the advice, I might go do that myself. (Sorry about getting into your business, I just had to say it)—Sir¬_¬ |BanterHOMOPHOBE!!!NOTM 02:37, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Of course I'm the one responding with... DRAMA! And yet that response included the "Oh, but we're just humble people trying to help you" act. I just meant that maybe you should actually look into a subject before you make suggestions that could very eaasily be taken the wrong way. And what does hospitality have anything to with this? Loopygrumpkins 02:50, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Okay, calm down, people. The article is obviously gonna be kept, so let's all just...CALM THE FUCK DOWN. —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!) 02:53, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
I'd also like to add that I didn't mean "You have no other work so go die noob!" I meant "OK, so you should just let this go and work on something else."—Sir¬_¬ |BanterHOMOPHOBE!!!NOTM 23:46, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
I see that in Loopygrumpkins's time here, he has read our policies as well as writing. "Work on something else" means "you're done with this", not "you're a horrible person for not doing anything else". --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 22:08, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
No consensus after over a week. Keeperised. --UU - natter10:15, Apr 6
Delete. It's a page on liberals or Al Gore with RuneScape thrown into the mix. Also, I don't think that many people have heard of the actual thing from Runescape, so it will be hard to contribute to the page to make it less randumb. Loopygrumpkins 16:27, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. No redeeming value. -- Skinfan1312:29 EST 4 April, 2010
Delete. Per Skinfan13. Googlyphil 16:40, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. If I had heard of the actual thing, this article would still be a waste of time. Spıke¬ 16:46 4-Apr-10
Delete. What's with all these tied votes? Here's something to vote about. This article is a blazing pile of failcruft that's remained hidden, somehow, for 4 years. It fails harder than fish bone baby food.--Count of Monkey Crisco 09:33, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
Blazing pile. The intro correctly tips off that the author feels no duty to actually write about something. Spıke¬ 10:39 4-Apr-10
Delete. Per SPIKE. I knew this was a pile of crap the moment I saw the year 2930 in the intro. -- Skinfan1312:31 EST 4 April, 2010
Delete. Utter crap. Loopygrumpkins 16:37, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. It's clean and as a continuation of the joke-series is appropriately short. I wouldn't mind adding a stub template to it. If content is the issue, I'll take the liberty to add more, but the previous entry in the series doesn't claim to be the last and I found this piece a rather funny parody of the previous entry which attempts to stop the series (of which I am unfortunately the creator of if anybody was wondering). --Hotadmin4u69[TALK]09:14 Apr 3 2010
Keep. I think as a series of jokes, which it is clear it is, this is worth keeping. Nameable • mumble? 13:16, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Any more than that, however, would be unnecessary. I'd give it the stub tag, though. --Wilytank 13:32, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. In Soviet Union this article finds you boring, useless and short. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:18, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I was hovering between keep/delete on this but it does need work to stay and I am not sure if anyone is going to fix it.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:30, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Let me get this straight: We have an article on a Dutch web site that's mostly in Russian? Which isn't funny? Spıke¬ 16:39 4-Apr-10
Delete. foriegncruft. --Mn-z 14:05, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Gamercruft with no relevant links. What? Not very notable (insert game character) from (insert recently released popular video game) is as tough as Chuck Norris? How completely (insert ironic adjective that seems to compliment about humor or orginality.) --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:18, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Typical game cruft where the writer presumes a reader knows all about the game and therefore doesn't bother to write a proper introduction. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:38, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I had abstained thinking the article might be amusing to someone with sufficient inside information. Now I'll ditto Romartus. Spıke¬ 16:52 4-Apr-10
Delete. per abovez. --Mn-z 13:52, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
You don't think that link, given that its target audience is Morons, might be the reason that this article is in the state it's in? Spıke¬ 15:08 2-Apr-10
Delete. I don't usually nom pages for VFD, but I found this while on vandalism patrol and I think it beats HTBFANJS to death. Take a look after the first paragraph. It used to be pretty bad a long while ago. Now, I just think it's awful.—Sir¬_¬ |BanterHOMOPHOBE!!!NOTM 03:34, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. It does break almost every rule in HTBFANJS. (But nominator should first restore the article to when it was merely "pretty bad.") I have never seen Chicken Jokes so interminable nor so unfunny. Spıke¬ 15:08 2-Apr-10
EXTERMINATE! And kill the 4th graders who wrote this pile of shit. —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!) 22:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Keep. "Motto: Yeah, she's my sister. So?" Casting a US state as a former Soviet Republic is thoroughly stagnant (a note I added to Section 8 of UN:HTBFANJS). But it's not all bad, and rather than have a gap in the set of US States (many of which are as bad as this), I would prefer preserving a vehicle for someone to improve--preferably, someone who does more than occasionally drive through, and always with enough gasoline to make it to the other side. Spıke¬ 17:13 29-Mar-10
Mn-z has a valid Comment below, but my vote stands; the article is not all bad. Slap a Rewrite tag on it to encourage, and preserve what's there as a start for, a hypothetical good writer. Spıke¬ 17:32 29-Mar-10
Keep. I agree with Spike that there shouldn't be a gap with the states, even if there are some already. Let's not try and make the problem worse, shall we. The other problem with deleting this article is that, from what I've seen, there are quite a few articles that reference Kentuckistan and there is atleast one map of the united states showing Kentuckistan (calling it Kentuckistan in the key). Loopygrumpkins 20:45, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Weak keep It's not my favorite article, but I didn't find it terrible. Plus, as Loopy said, it's a staple in articles and maps relating to the United States. `--Paizu • Maj. • JStw • MUN • LOB • Crap • WHORE • (Talk) 21:49, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Keep. I was able to completely rewrite the article for my beloved commonwealth (Virginia), maybe someday I'll do something about this... --SirSkinfan13Talk{< CUNRotMFBotMVFHΥΣΣMaj.SK>} 01:52 EST 31 Mar, 2010
Delete
Delete. and hope someone writes a decent article on Kentucky. --Mn-z 17:01, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This wasn't a funny article. I couldn't figure out what, if anything, it was trying to parody. I absolutely disagree with SPIKE and Loopy: a red link is far better than a bad article. pillow talk 20:47, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. While I see where SPIKE is coming from, I think Hyperbole's argument is stronger. My view was that the article was too incoherent to be enjoyable and I feel that a rewrite tag doesn't carry the clout that would be likely to improve this any time soon. I feel that deleting and hoping a new one is created is the better course of action here. --Chiefjustice3DS 21:45, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
RE:Spike we have other gaps in the states, for example West Virgina and North Carolina. BTW, they redirect to United States of America, and I think leaving them as red links would make their creation more likely. --Mn-z 17:24, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
RE:Spike's comment on his vote it is more an issue of an overgrown tired injoke that infects way too many articles. (Sort of like Kitten Huffing or Oscar Wilde, but never funny to begin with.) If this is kept, I would suggest moving it to Kentucky, along with Category:Kentuckistan and Category:KentuckistaniUsers. --Mn-z 17:40, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
I agree; the current name of the article is part of the stagnant joke. Spıke¬ 17:53 29-Mar-10
Fuck alla y'all niggaz. Also, has usage in the userspace. Consider that. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:08, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
it's fucking hilarious --Roman Dog Bird 01:30, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. With this rationale, we ought to be delete this rewrite template. Who knows, maybe a fat editor will find it on their new page and will be too insulted, distracted, or confused to fix their article? Nigga please. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK]23:44 Mar 31 2010
Delete. If a person of unspecified race utters the word "nigger" to an author or a bystander of dark (and thin) skin, he gets hostile for a long time. I'm willing not to care if there is a connection to humor that I don't see, and will cheerfully withdraw the nomination if there is some very popular piece of American pop culture that everyone will know and I should have known. Otherwise, it's a needlessly provocative way to tell someone to clean up their article. Only 6 articles use it, and 2 of them are in VFD now. Spıke¬ 01:24 29-Mar-10
Delete as a redundant and unnecessary maintenance template. I could give a shit about the racism concerns. pillow talk 03:11, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Not required here. Other tags work better. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:28, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Nigga Please this is technically a pseudo-maintenance, not a maintenance template. Also, it's not racist enough. --Mn-z 14:21, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Re:TKF: we delete templates that are used in userspace all the time, and we have a process for dealing with that. (Basically, its deleted, then restored, normally by MadMax with {{Dammed Template}} so (in theory) no one uses it mainspace again.)
Re:Wiltank/RDB: we are voting to delete it because its a worthless psuedo-maintenance template, not because of its supposed "racism". --Mn-z 04:36, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
To be clear: I have never claimed that uttering the word X makes you a Y. I claimed that this template would, for certain audiences, fail spectacularly at what it is trying to communicate. Spıke¬ 18:05 30-Mar-10
To be clearer: You should not vote to delete this because it may or may not offend niggers. Rather, you should be vote to delete this because its redundant with {{Rewrite}} except that this one doesn't add articles to Category:Rewrite, is less clear in explaining that needs done to the article, insults the reader more, uglifies the article it's on more, and in general does what {{Rewrite}} does only worse. --Mn-z 18:59, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
To quote the eternally quotable Woody quote: "Funny > Rules." This template kicks ass in the funny region. Maintenance red tape ain't got shit on that nigga. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:07, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
Maybe we should turn it into an image macro. Templates are the worst way to insert humor in an article. It is like sticking in a random one-liner as a quote, but without spending the 30 seconds to think of something original that isn't in 50 other articles. --Mn-z 18:17, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Why don't we start using it then? How's about we replace that shitty "Hard Rewrite" template that makes retarded people blank articles (LOLOL I STEMROLLED IT ARENT I CLEVAR). Insulting? Whatever man. --Roman Dog Bird 21:20, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
That might be a good idea. While we are at it, the rewrite template probably needs some rework. --Mn-z 04:42, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
Comment. Why don't we round up all the non-standard rewrite/format templates and drop them all into a single page with the <choose><option> tags around them to have a rotating non-standard option? Hell give me a list and I will do it with proper categories and all. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*(talk)(stalk)Π ~ ~ 31 Mar 2010 ~ 23:37 (UTC)
Keep. Newcastle is a very notable city, especially for a humor web site, and the notice at the top of the page links you not to an alternative but to a disambiguation page. I would not prefer a red-link to this page. Spıke¬ 00:42 30-Mar-10
this page is much better. I'm not sure how much of a difference there is between the two places, though. --Paizu • Maj. • JStw • MUN • LOB • Crap • WHORE • (Talk) 00:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Yes, the latter one is better--but it's about a different city. There are not two articles on the northeastern Newcastle that would make it easy to say, huff the one and let the other take its place. Spıke¬ 00:54 30-Mar-10
Keep. This article is classic. How could even begin to think of deleting it? Loopygrumpkins 03:57, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Keep I remember when I first came to Uncyclopedia and decided to read every article in alphabetical order. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:38, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Keep.. Although parts of the article were just awful, a large amount of the article had very deep and hilarious meanings. That second section is VFH worthy.—Sir¬_¬ |BanterHOMOPHOBE!!!NOTM 03:19, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
Keep.. Mainly because of the hilarious wordplay in the third to last section. You know the one? Nameable • mumble? 15:19, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. You are joking aren't you? You can't delete AAAAAAA! It's AAAAAAA! for God's sake! --Ozymandiaz 16:54, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
Kerkill I love this article, but it is cruft of '05. The nomination is rock-solid. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 00:05, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Comment': If you love it then why do you want to delete it? Are you some sort of masochist? The nomination is about as solid as Chris Crocker in the World Wrestling Federation. --Ozymandiaz 16:54, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
Some things are too awesome to mess with, don't you mess with my AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!! --Skinfan13 23:40 EST 31 Mar, 2010
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAA!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AA AAA AAAAAA
Exactly!
(Look, unless this, or any other "completed" article, rises up and bites you on the ass why don't you just leave them alone? Now go play in traffic or add some {{fix}}, {{cleanup}}, {{expand}}, {{rewrite}}, {{rewrite|medium}}, {{rewrite|hard}}, {{AAP}}, {{Help}} tags to something.) ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*(talk)(stalk)Π ~ ~ 01 Apr 2010 ~ 00:26 (UTC)
Delete. Seems to be an article written by someone who doesn't like the small town that they live in. Not funny in the least. Loopygrumpkins 21:21, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Well-formatted, but the humor is of two types: Cheap cut-downs, and things that are totally unremarkable, such as hostility to new arrivals and alcoholism. "The Manor is a crap pub attempting to become a club"--Now, how am I to evaluate the humor of that? Similes or clever turns of phrases could make it okay, but this article has only one, the initial comparison to Woolworth's. Limbaugh is right when he says, "Quality humor must have a seed of truth," and this is the problem with articles where we will never know the seed, including the one on your school. Spıke¬ 21:40 30-Mar-10
Delete.. Typical my/that town is crap and done without irony or humour. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:38, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.. Yet another Brit towncruft article that is much the same as all the rest. Although it doesn't mention chavs, which is refreshing. Rabbi TechnokvetchContribsFOXES 08:05, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. 2005 category, contains 1 page, which is an archive of in-joke sectional templates, the category below, and Category:Kentuckistan, which is also 2005cruft. --Mn-z 16:54, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
The archive (In-universe) looked like useful reference information. (Useful only for in-jokes?) It doesn't go away if the Category does, does it? Spıke¬ 17:06 29-Mar-10
Aw hell naw! What a worthless piece of furry. --Wilytank 13:38, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
RE:Spike no, it would only remove this category from that page. (To clear a deleted category, the category must be removed from all pages containing that category. In this case, it is {{USpades}} [which itself will probably be deleted] that is adding the category. In the unlikely event that {{USpades}} survives vfd by this category doesn't, the "autocatting" code in that template will likely/hopefully be removed.) --Mn-z 17:33, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Profanity and seizure writing do not a parody make. Only really touched by Jack Cain since 2006. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:42, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 00:55, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Count of Monte Cristo as it might be texted. Am not LOL. It might go in UnScripts--if it were any good. Spıke¬ 01:14 29-Mar-10
Delete. - This is crap. --
EXTERMINATE!
Fallout 3
Keep. It isn't such a bad article, needs some attention though. --
Keep A few chuckles from me, liked it 'though could use a little more polishing and additions. A definite keeper. 
Get rid. 
Comment. I find it quite hard to understand that an admin forgets to put the VFD tag on a VFD article he nominated. I'm sorry about continuously bringing this up, but if the article in question votes to be deleted and gets kept because someone forgot the tag it's all for nothing. --
Strong Keep! Í dídn't thínk ít wás töö bád by the tímé Í göt tö ít... nöw thát Í've édíted ít söme Í thínk ít hás réál pöténtíál. ~ 
Feature! 
Smite. It's like being water boarded with memes. --
Abstain. Puppy says it's something real but I sure don't see it. --
