This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Delete. Has a (stub) section about the humor of having to write links, and a (stub) section about the humor of having to add Oscar Wilde quotes. Uses "gay" as a throwaway and fails to link it to the "Rainbow Coalition" flag. What's left is brainstorming about the names of the various colors. And a clever acronym--but any New Hampshire Republican is cleverer at it, and still out of office. Spıke¬ 18:34 15-Feb-10
Weak Keep. It hit's all the tourist attractions for Cthulhu related stuff and seems a bit tired like that but capable prose, a good sense of parody crossover and an awesome picture make it acceptable. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:54, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Mr.N. will be pleased to see me get off the fence (after Comments below), as the Count seems to think this article relates to something. Spıke¬ 23:02 15-Feb-10
"Many who watch the entire film become incurably insane, others simply vanish the next morning, never to be seen again." Except for self-important gas like this, and like reviewers speaking in tongues, it's adequately written. I don't know if it's about something. Visited Cthulhu and don't understand what its point is either. Spıke¬ 04:29 14-Feb-10
Chuck Ball! Not just wibble, it's wibble made by someone who's totally boring. This is someone who's predictable even when trying to be random. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:45, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
No Sale. After being told in the intro that the subject is scary "because they are GREEN and FLY," Section 1 is "Inane ramblings." Admirable self-awareness, but who would read further? It's a collection of weasel words and encyclopedia clichés. Spıke¬ 18:38 15-Feb-10
Delete. 2005 cruft about nothing that actually exists. It's not funny, the grammar is iffy and it's worth 2.5 points in Chuck Ball. --Count of Monkey Crisco 16:43, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I don't know what it's supposed to be about (maybe it's better that way). The article is pretty bombastic and unnecessary. "He eats his own poop." Yeah very funny. --Wilytank 16:58, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. If this was a TV show, it was one without a Wikipedia entry. Largest paragraph describes a fight with Chuck Norris, isn't that special? Spıke¬ 17:23 15-Feb-10
ADURHURHURHURHURHURHURHURHURHUR --Roman Dog Bird 21:56, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - The author of this article eats his own poop. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 22:56, Feb. 15, 2010
Keep. A real article about a real, notable person, funny in several places, regrettably pompous in the intro before the reader is sold to continue reading. Offshoots like the movie mean there is a lot to talk about. If Romartus would like to use his panoramic knowledge of history, I'll copy-edit. Spıke¬ 13:54 14-Feb-10
Keep The first graphs need some cleanup and additions after the first sentence or two. Then some good jokes follow. I really like the photo. This seems like more of a 'votes for potentially good articles which need work' nom than a 'votes for deletion' nom. I'll put in a few minutes of work on it myself, pump some life into the corpse (one of my hobbies, it gets messy sometimes but the corpses never seem to mind, no harm no foul) Aleister in Chains 14:34 Chinese New Year MMX
We don't care about your fucking forums. Go to ED if you want to rant about your fucking MMO thing. —PaizuriMUN♦Talkpage♦My Contributions♦08:15, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
We don't care. If it weren't so hard to say, I'd coin the term clique-cruft for such articles. Spıke¬ 13:49 14-Feb-10
Delete. I had no idea that Smackus Downus was Roman for penis-pussy, but now we know. Episode lists are so much like one-line lists of Fun Facts. "What the reader has to know to enjoy this article" is always a concern, but it's unacceptable that a reader should have to have watched each episode of SmackDown. Spıke¬ 13:48 14-Feb-10
Delete. I'll flip my vote if someone determines that this article was a copy of Derek Smart (see below) and that they're both somehow good. Spıke¬ 13:43 14-Feb-10
fucking hate this shit --Roman Dog Bird 19:39, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
I'm in the middle on this one. Some parts were good, others less so. I at least think it should be rewritten, even if it means starting from scratch. --Wilytank 14:46, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
Get of the dam fence and vote man! Abstain is as useless as a condom machine in the Vatican. Actually that's a rubbish comparison. Old shit joke also. I am rather ashamed of this whole affair now... MrNFork you! 19:53, Feb 14
Wilytank's offense is not commenting without a vote, as Mr.N. has also done, but offering the particular comment that he'd like to see someone else rewrite it. "Starting from scratch" is of course an option once the article is deleted, as seems imminent. I can't do justice to Phoenix Wright, but Wilytank is welcome to step up, and the usual culprits might help him. Spıke¬ 04:20 15-Feb-10
Also I did not bother to read it. I'm just trolling around talking carp as usual. Someone who has read it, but still does not have an opinion... That's a waste of time. Not like this comment. Obviously. MrNFork you! 18:14, Feb 15
Delete. Essentially a Chuck Norris wannabe, except Mr. Smart here has an army of lists to back him up. —PaizuriMUN♦Talkpage♦My Contributions♦05:15, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
yeah nigga yeah --Roman Dog Bird 06:08, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.. Gets progressively worse as it goes down, and starts bad.—Sir¬_¬ |BanterHOMOPHOBE!!!NOTM 07:09, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Definitely "paid by page count." Spıke¬ 13:41 14-Feb-10
Delete. - These are the type of pages I had in mind when I came up with Chuck Ball. The copious amounts of listcruft irritate me instead of making me chuckle. The only things mildly amusing are Coca-Cola being his arch-enemy, and the fact that it red-links to WordGirl in the See Also section, though the huge laugh I got from that was likely unintentional on the author's part. What a little girl superhero cartoon on PBS Kids has to do with this "Mr. Kickass" themed character is unclear. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 04:30, Feb. 15, 2010
Delete. - The concept has potential, but the execution in the article is piss-poot. "Meeko decided that the Game Boy Microscopic should look exactly like the Game Boy Micro only 99.999456946949265 times smaller." Just say 100, dammit! Your random numbers do not amuse me. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 04:34, Feb. 15, 2010
Heh, I said piss-poot instead of piss-poor. I'm not changing that typo! --Kip > Talk•Works•• 04:57, Feb. 15, 2010
Delete. Even though I just reverted a vandalism spree by Tinkywinkyisgayisafuckingfaggot on this page twice, it has no redeeming value. —PaizuriMUN♦Talkpage♦My Contributions♦03:56, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Crap. Has always been so. Easy. --UU - natter11:45, Feb 15
This is a real article about a real studio head. It's mostly random rather than funny, but my only beef with it is that Bluth and all the Bluth movies listed are the stomping grounds of the said vandal. However, this problem is better solved with a wood chipper. Spıke¬ 04:42 14-Feb-10
Delete. Ah, so the Hello Kitty clique has a sandbox too. I always mistrust articles whose titles contain a word with three consecutive z's, as it indicates they don't feel bound to make anything relate to reality, and it means no one (except people like RDB) will stumble on the page. But I guess that's the point. It's just for AllOfMyFriendsAndI. Spıke¬ 21:29 13-Feb-10
Keep. This is good writing, despite self-conscious parentheticals and even an emoticon. The last 3 sections get predictable and listy, but it's definitely fixable. Spıke¬ 11:19 13-Feb-10
Keep. Did you check the page history? Had you done so you would have found a much better version. (Mhaille's version). I spent just a few mins merging the current version with this, and deleting the carp. Come on, chaps. VFD should work better than this. Maybe you think this still sucks, but it's not just about voting on the current state of the page, but on how it's been in the past also. MrNFork you! 14:15, Feb 14
Delete. Well..I have seen this place and isn't as bad as all this! So this is a vote for Colchester and against the unfunny writer of this article. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 01:17, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
LET'S CHECK THE PAGE HISTORY A BIT MORE BEFORE NOMINATION EH CHAPS? In extreme cases of people not bothering to do this, I will close the nomination and maybe even wave the ban stick around a bit. Maybe this still sucks, but it's a shit load better than it was before I spent only a few mins fixing it. If you can't be arsed to check the page history, don't nominate. MrNFork you! 14:25, Feb 14
TIM WHITE!!!! --Roman Dog Bird 02:11, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This method of identifying crap articles is working uncannily well. Let's see: in the first two lines: Chatting with the reader (a pun that belongs in Idaho, where it surely already is), a nonsense year number, and a meme (kitten-huffing). Cryptic references to the archetypal college president (now called "speaking truth to power"). And a claim that the entire senior year is spent studying bullshit. Mine was! Spıke¬ 02:12 13-Feb-10
I'm pretty sure I didn't vote keep on any crappy college article, and I'm not going to fucking start now. -OptyCSucks! CUN15:16, 13 Feb
Delete.. Per Spike. Oh, and red links. I hate them so much and I don't even know why. They're here.—Sir¬_¬ |BanterHOMOPHOBE!!!NOTM 20:52, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! Not at all funny. Wild at Heart 22:11, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
"Originally intended to be a giant, city sized series of pubs" is HILARIOUS! However, the rest of the article is not, unless you are drunky-drunk, then it all makes sense (and is HILARIOUS!) Also, the "Majors and Courses" section appears to be accurate.
Delete. - We now have our second victim of Chuck Ball! Note the irony in the name. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 01:27, Feb. 13, 2010
Everybody, it's a good thing. Ain't it true, it's a monumental good thing.............(not, lol). --RomanDogBird!!!!!:D :D :D :D :D :D :D 01:32, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This stub is either about (1) nothing, or (2) the author. Spıke¬ 01:46 13-Feb-10
Delete I was going to vote keep and then there was Chuck Norris. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:24, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - Hey guys! In honor of the Olympics, let's play a little game of our own. It's called Chuck Norris Ball, or Chuck Ball for short. The object of the game is to go to Special:WhatLinksHere/Chuck Norris and find as many VFD-worthy pages as possible. The winner, of course, will be Uncyclopedia. The first hand-picked one is BASEketball, an article about a fictional game based off a movie staring to two creators of South Park. With a premise like that, you know in the pit of your stomach it's gonna be crap. Let the game begin! --Kip > Talk•Works•• 00:58, Feb. 13, 2010
Delete. It is very difficult to write an article to take the piss out of a movie whose thesis is to take the piss out of itself, and this author doesn't have it. Quotes tell me how to interpret what I haven't read yet; intro assaults me with memes. Section 2 goes to the meta-level, another risky concept, to which the author's only approach is gazillions and the year 200034. At that point, it becomes a video game, hold-the-video, and ends in--are you ready?--listcruft! Epic fail. Spıke¬ 01:04 13-Feb-10
It doesn't necessarily have to be crap just because of the South Park connection. But, most South Park fans (myself excluded since I totally rule and stuff) are idiots as far as I can tell. And this does suck. Much more than the movie (which I like to an extent, but I haven't watched it in at least five years, so I don't remember it to well.). Wait, what are you getting at exactly? Whatever, delete. --RomanDogBird!!!!!:D :D :D :D :D :D :D 01:06, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I rewrote the article on South Park. I could only elevate it from fail to semi-fail. --Matfen 15:17, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. In this space I should probably add a paragraph about just how awful this article is and how it does/doesn't relate to South Park. But really, I can't be assed. So instead I think I'll tell you all what I plan on having for dinner tonight. I think I'll start with a light garden salad with blue cheese dressing. Then I'm going to make a nice batch of beer cheese soup. For the main course I have a pair of beautiful steaks I picked up from the butcher yesterday, superbly marbled and thick. I'm going to pan sear them and then broil them to medium rare. I like my steaks naked, but my wife will probably want to season hers. To each their own, eh? I think I'll enjoy the last of the bottle of twelve year old The Glenlivet that my wife bought me for christmas with the steak. Then I think I'll retire to the living room and enjoy an after dinner smoke and watch some TV. What are your guys' plans? -OptyCSucks! CUN15:27, 13 Feb
You guys may have picked up a 41st vote, but you can't filibuster here!!! Spıke¬ 15:31 13-Feb-10
Comments
Post deletion comment. South Park and its movie are difficult to satire because they are satire. A good writer could make it funny, but this guy could not. (And I couldn't either, so don't look at me!:P)—Sir¬_¬ |BanterHOMOPHOBE!!!NOTM 20:57, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Too short, too unfunny. Wild at Heart 22:45, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I spent a couple days in college pursuing trinary computing. This article pursues just about all the jokes there are in the subject without stretching it to the point of pain, notably the contraction of "trinary digit." And due to the advances in computing, anyone who tries to make the article better will have the same problems as someone writing really funny stuff about buggy-whips. Spıke¬ 22:53 12-Feb-10
Delete. - I'm as pro math humor as the next nerd, but this is badly written, forced in places, and overall unfunny. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 23:27, Feb. 12, 2010
Delete. Purely because they fucked up the value of pi. -OptyCSucks! CUN15:12, 13 Feb
Delete. Get past the Latin and the Star Trek references and isn't this just some kid writing--I should say encoding--about his college or prep school? Spıke¬ 22:41 12-Feb-10
Delete. - Pointless drivel. Although the Kermit the Frog puppet that caught me by surprise made me laugh loudly. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 23:24, Feb. 12, 2010
EXTERMINATE!Wild at Heart 03:48, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. He is a caricature, but he is an institution, and a success. Make of him what you will, whoever starts over on this one. But he is not (yawn!) a video game. Spıke¬ 22:45 12-Feb-10
Delete. Bad concept. Wild at Heart 22:45, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - At first glance, I thought this might have been worthy of a keep vote due to concept. A game based on Rodney Dangerfield? Hilarity could ensure, I thought. Unfortunately, upon reading it, one can see the main joke is a bad pun based on the man's last name, followed by poor writting and namedropping. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 22:57, Feb. 12, 2010
Yeah, like Kip, the idea of comparing Dangerfield to Minesweeper made me grin. The rest of the article quickly took care of that. This legend deserves so much better. -OptyCSucks! CUN15:10, 13 Feb
Delete. You had me at namedropping Harry Potter. --Matfen 15:19, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. "The band was best known for its crazy MySpace antics," and that is where this irreverent piece of collective vanity belongs. Spıke¬ 22:32 12-Feb-10
Bandcruft - Long and boring, made worse by the fact that nobody cares about this unnotable band. Random namedrops galore, including Britney Spears, John Paul Jones, Buckethead, Iggy Pop, William Shatner, Radiohead, William Hung, Richard Wagner, Jimmy Kimmel, Stephen King, Europe, Nikki Sixx, Maddox, Chuck Norris (of course), and Oscar Wilde at the end for good measure. Finally, the formatting really sucks. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 23:17, Feb. 12, 2010
Wait--does someone win by dropping the names of Shatner and Hung?! Spıke¬ 02:52 13-Feb-10
No. Only Burt Reynolds and Tom Selleck are currently acceptable. Keep up man! MrNFork you! 02:58, Feb 13
EXTERMINATE! for the namedrops if nothing else. Wild at Heart 03:48, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Pants. And is this a real band? Never heard of 'em. Don't care either. -OptyCSucks! CUN15:07, 13 Feb
Keep. It's tedious,[citation needed] but that's its only problem, and the problem is an illustration. It's most of the way toward good. Spıke¬ 02:51 13-Feb-10
Delete. Too short, too unfunny. Wild at Heart 01:29, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
It's tedious,[citation needed] but I suspect its presence in the template means it is an archetype of a bad article--that's right, so bad it's good.Spıke¬ 01:48 12-Feb-10
EXTERMINATE! Too many sex jokes. Wild at Heart 22:37, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I don't mind sex jokes, even in mild excess. But there is nothing else here, such as anything that relates to the actual magazine. Spıke¬ 22:43 12-Feb-10
Delete. - Everytime one of these crappy articles are written, the universe gives Mhaille bad karma. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 23:22, Feb. 12, 2010
*Keep. I would kind of like to keep it, which usually wouldn't give m enough morale to vote, but I have a feeling there is a torrent of keeps coming.—Sir¬_¬ |BanterHOMOPHOBE!!!NOTM 08:31, February 12, 2010 (UTC) Abstaining.
We just blocked one of his sockpuppets which proves that the user in question was not the innocent kid you thought he was. You were trolled, and you fell for it. This needs to go now. If people think this article is funny in its own right, fair enough. We do not commemorate trolls. Not ones which are this obvious at it anyway. MrNFork you! 08:37, Feb 12
But I have a feeling this will end up an in-joke; so I really feel that there's no point in voting for deletion, since I'm almost positive it will be kept. And, on its own, it just has a sort of charm to it. (Also, I get your point there; the first one was obvious and pretty much admitted, and all that)—Sir¬_¬ |BanterHOMOPHOBE!!!NOTM 08:40, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Weak keep. We actually docommemoratetrolls, but this article doesn't. When I first saw it, it seemed like an article about poop-flinging monkeys and nothing more, and I'm sure the casual visitor would see it the same way. Delete the talk page if you'd rather. (Weak keep because it is a crap page.) --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 09:01, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
"We do not commemorate trolls. Not ones which are this obvious at it anyway" I'm sure I said that somewhere before. MrNFork you! 10:12, Feb 12
Keeper Just the title refers to the kid Pie, and not to any of his disruptive socks. And 6 to 8 on VFH just a couple of days ago--six users voted for it for VFH within a few hours--so imnho it shouldn't be huffed for that reason alone. It is also a good article and has a very interesting message (see comment below). It's also on Worst 100 of 2010, so has a history as well in that quarter. And one user has said it's the best article since "Euroipods", so some people do like it very much.Not written by the kid, but by this kid. Adds up to an obvious keep. Aleister in Chains 12:31 12 Feb. MMX
Weak keep. I don't so much care about the pie kid. Too bad he thought he could sockpuppet his way out of trouble, whatever. The thing is, the article never even comes close to referencing the kid or the drama, and I don't think it's QVFD quality either. Per Syndrome, basically, except I don't think Hardwick Fundlebuggy was a troll. On top of that, the article is principally too young for VFD. I don't see why we shouldn't just follow regular procedure. Someone with the right authority can tag it with an ICU or expand tag. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM14:55, 12 February 2010
Had I followed process I would have huffed it already. I know the author is not going to change it much so there is no point using ICU. We use VFD like this sometimes for such things... MrNFork you! 17:43, Feb 12
Did an author not planning to change an article ever save it from ICU? Suppose you ICU it. If it somehow turns into an enjoyable article, then that's great. If it stays the same, then it's bye bye poop throwing monkeys. Just saying. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM19:48, 12 February 2010
ICU is really more for those who don't know any better IMO. Like me in this case apparently as these monkeys are kept! MrNFork you! 21:44, Feb 12
Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! Are we not men? We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We are DEVO! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! We must repeat. D-E-V-O! OK LET'S GO. --RomanDogBird!!!!!:D :D :D :D :D :D :D 16:23, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Strongest Keep Ever I've laughed harder at this than I have at any other article this year. sausagelol 17:47, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Well it did get some votes on VFH so I'm not going to huff it straight away. What does VFD think of this poop? MrNFork you! 08:11, Feb 12
Delete. The concept is crap, the story is gross, the single illustration is repeated 8 times, it takes work to figure out what some of the exclamations mean, and the article's single scatological joke is not told except in a parenthesized stage direction. And I am not impressed by Aleister's celebration that it takes mankind down a notch (as it is not in fact anthropology), nor by HELPME's calculus in trying to figure out how to be on the winning side of the vote. Spıke¬ 13:06 12-Feb-10
The four chimps in the cage throw the first poop, then the guy in the suit talks, then the four chimps are shown again as they throw more poop. Then the guy in the suit throws poop. That's why the illustrations repeat. Al in Chains, a few minutes later.
And I just made the man in the suit a professor of anthropology, which enhances the article into a clearer perspective of my comment, below. Thanks for the idea, see, these VFD's can improve a page just by discussion alone. Thanks again, Aleister in Chains 13:40 12 Feb. MMX
Hardly an enhancement, as at state universities, social-science professors as well as their union representatives throw poop with no provocation at all. Imagine emoticon here.Spıke¬ 14:36 12-Feb-10
Comments
Comment Put the drama aside, and look at the page on its own. I've come to realize how good it is, because, in a nutshell, a man in a suit goes from an enjoyable moment in his life to becoming a poop throwing monkey himself in about 12 seconds. The guy in the suit poops in his hands (so he must have taken down his pants, a couple of seconds time there) and throws it at the chimps in a territorial dispute. The five primates on the page, four chimps and a human, are defending their "area" (the man, his person, his pride, and his property--the suit), just like I'm doing now with this comment, although in words and not poop. The point is that the page shows in a quick read that humans are primates, we are apes, something denied by a vast majority of the human ape population. So, on the point of it having a message, it should, imnho, be kept. Aleister in Chains 12:37 12 Feb. MMX
Keep with "expand." What's there is a band article that's actually funny rather than all one-line put-downs or a springboard into drug culture. Spıke¬ 18:11 12-Feb-10
Delete. Too short, too in-joke-y, too unfunny. Wild at Heart 01:27, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Socky nominated this on 11-Sep-09, kept by a vote of 7?-3? and Optimuschris converted it from total randomness to a fair but brief description of the heavy-metal band. Maybe we can subpeona [sic] him to take it a bit further. Hell, maybe Fredd and HELPME will report progress on the pages we recently delegated to them. Spıke¬ 01:42 12-Feb-10 post-edited
Guess I'm missing why it should be deleted. Seems to be some funny bits in there, and lots of work has gone into it. And the size itself, for a small town, is funny. Shouldn't there be a template on the page letting them know about this vote, and contact the principal writers to ask them to tone it back and leave out personal names? Just looks like a lot of work to be huffed without an attempt to reign it in and ask one of their editors to be responsible for watching it and keeping it short, unlike this comment.Aleister in Chains 00:48 12 Feb. MMX
Do the funny bits include the fanciful treatment of the municipal user-fee for trash pickup? Or somewhere else in the 51-bleeping-K? I'm receptive to trying to contact and rein in the authors, but suspect they will not want to see their Baby in handcuffs. After all, they wrote 51K (if there are more than one of them) without beginning a talk page. Meanwhile, the only one of us who gives A's for effort (or time spent) is Jupiterfox. Spıke¬ 01:04 12-Feb-10
OK, I studied it in depth, and withdraw my keeper. At first I was just going to huff the section you spoke of, and then realized it couldn't be huffed without breaking the tone of the entire page. So, yeah, abstain. Aleister in Chains 1:56 12 Feb. MMX
Delete
Delete. Ham glazing epic cruft. This is almost certainly some fanciful vanity and it's rate of growth over the last three months is hideous. La Grange Park Ill. is a town of 13,000. At least normal towncruft has the decency to be compact and predictable. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:34, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
There's more??? Given a historical charter of a fantasy armageddon of interest only to a few kids from the white-bread capital of America, we do not need the whole thing verbatim. Spıke¬ 00:39 12-Feb-10
Delete. Reads like some game scenario or perhaps disguised vanity. Move to the user's page or delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:07, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Too short, too unfunny. Wild at Heart 01:29, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. "We, as in me," think author is way too taken with his prowess with words and may be one of the world's "utterly useless idiot's." Spıke¬ 01:51 12-Feb-10
Delete. I didn't read past the first two sentences and I'm voting delete. And I don't feel a bit guilty about it. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 05:08, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Idiot's/idiots of the word, you have a new leader. Now go away and bin yourselves. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:58, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! Unfunny, short, red link-y. Wild at Heart 01:23, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Follow the link to the Wikipedia article if you think the author has done anything of value. The result is most notable for its nonsense numbers. Spıke¬ 01:35 12-Feb-10
Delete. The length is good, as good as Independence Wisconsin deserves, but the article is an example of extremely lazy sporking with no forethought on a direction or theme. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:08, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Both the town and the article. I live in Wisconsin. Independence is a terrible place. sausagelol 02:17, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. How randomly random. Lose it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:39, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
It's short, but at least it's terrible. -OptyCSucks! CUN23:53, 11 Feb
Delete. From its Kenya-based template, to the invocation of extraterrestrials in the first sentence, to an incoherent problem with Bush at the end, it's random. Author had one chance for humor: Maybe courtiers called the commoner to the castle because they were eager to turn an anecdote of chance clairvoyance into proof that the King is not a liar. But author chose instead to give the commoner a royal blowjob. How--random! Spıke¬ 00:29 12-Feb-10
Was on VFD for four hours on 4-Aug-06. 00:29 PS--That's from the history, and that VFD was reverted; but no mention of it in archives 40-42. Spıke¬ 00:52 12-Feb-10
Delete. A cranky, ED style article about a website about fanfics about a game. I hate! hate! hat! this article. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:56, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Just before we reach the super-sized Table of Contents, we read: "This is, in fact, all inside information." In other words, a big inside joke. In retrospect, that was truth-in-advertising. Spıke¬ 00:42 12-Feb-10
Delete. Massive inside joke, but at the same time it indeed reads like ED. Wild at Heart 01:26, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE!. To quote SPIKE further down this page, this template "is a navigation tool to scatology, randomness, and a few useful pages that nevertheless don't relate to one another." Cerise and scarlet are both dead links, Carmine is at VFD, and the template's just random for the sake of being random without relation. (Tom Hanks for Maroon is a wicked stealth pun, though.) Wild at Heart 20:53, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Anyone who quotes me deserves my vote! There is already, of course, a Template:Colours that actually links to articles about colors. Imagine! Spıke¬ 21:07 11-Feb-10
Delete. I usually go easy on templates but... yeah, after looking at all the links I think we can do without. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:30, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - There's already a page on the doctor, with most of the same jokes, and this one is poorly done. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 18:21, Feb. 11, 2010
Delete. It's barely an article. But it does point you to the good one right at the top. And I still have a soft spot for misuse of English by foreigners. Spıke¬ 18:30 11-Feb-10
Delete but merge the song title "Straight outta that place over there you know by the bar no not that bar the other one downtown where we used to go last month ah nevermind you can just look for it in a map later" into the real article. That seriously cracked me up. pillow talk 19:42, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! This is just crap. Wild at Heart 20:48, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This was a funny article before it was translated into Navajo, then French, then Farsi, then Esperanto, then Zulu, then English on Bablefish. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:45, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! Too random, too unfunny. Wild at Heart 03:48, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Flush! - Down to Illogicopedia it goes. Chances are it'll probably be their article of the century. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 04:30, Feb. 11, 2010
dijgjdggfjffjgndsfogkfdsfghfgdsfghfgdsafghjmjghfjgk,trghj,fdgjhvgfdrsg --Roman Dog Bird 05:44, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Present. Love Hong Kong, love botched foreign attempts at Engrish, love foreign chicks, but can't claim this is well-written, or even that authors know this isn't Wikipedia, to which they've surely shopped the article. Surely the "mystery" in Section 4 is that only one of the two ferry boats is on either landing at any time? Spıke¬ 04:39 11-Feb-10
Keep. It's one of those articles that look like the thing it's about, though some sections of it are not word salad. True word salad follows normal grammatical structures but contains no real meaning. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:49, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Then it surely cannot both do that and be funny. At most it can be an illustration. Spıke¬ 04:41 11-Feb-10
I would nominate AAAAAAAAA!, but even I can see a clear exercise in futility. Granted that the author is a virtuoso, it is a long drum solo while you are waiting for the music to resume. Spıke¬ 18:33 11-Feb-10
Delete. Got here from Template:Incoherent. At best, move it to UnPoetry:. Or huff it outright. Enya makes music. Yanni musically postures about his own refinement. This article is Yanni. Spıke¬ 03:33 11-Feb-10
EXTERMINATE! Tries way too hard. Wild at Heart 03:49, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Like many salads, this plate is covered in ugly, tasteless lettuce. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:08, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Sigh, am now reading the 5-0 Keep vote in March, 2009. My nomination stands; sorry for any waste of your time.
Delete. Babble follows total lack of an intro, plus a totally struck-through Section 1, two hints to the reader not to proceed. Template:Incoherent dares us to VFD it. Who's next?! Spıke¬ 03:27 11-Feb-10
EXTERMINATE! per Spike. Wild at Heart 03:50, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Flush! - Down to Illogicopedia it goes. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 04:33, Feb. 11, 2010
Delete. If we don't delete this now the writer's going to feel stupid about writing it when he or she turns 8. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:42, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
its a friggen mindwashing machine --Roman Dog Bird 02:45, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This isn't one of those alternate point-of-views. It's an author with no discipline to be bound by the encyclopedic point-of-view. I don't care about your fricking video game, despite your editorializing in the intro. Spıke¬ 02:47 11-Feb-10
EXTERMINATE!Wild at Heart 03:51, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
I LIKE PIESOUP!!! --Kip > Talk•Works•• 04:24, Feb. 11, 2010
Delete. I smell Hajime Socialist Republic, except that this guy is in another galaxy. How many "optomistic and outgoing" people have we neglected by focusing only on Planet Earth?! Spıke¬ 02:44 11-Feb-10
EXTERMINATE!Wild at Heart 03:50, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
It has the advantage of being shorter. It still breaks every rule in the humor book. Spıke¬ 02:50 11-Feb-10
Delete
Delete. Who does this guy think he is? Chuck Norris? At least Chuck Norris jokes tend to be quick paced and amusing. This is a Chuck Norris joke downshifted a few gears and driven slowly through a featureless desert wasteland with the air conditioner broken and nothing on the radio. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:33, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I did that once, in a Hyundai with no air conditioning. I had four tape cassettes, but the radio shut itself off every two minutes because I had let the battery run down and the anti-theft code was back at home. But this article is worse. I cannot believe that even the author would slog through it to derive more (?) amusement. Spıke¬ 01:42 11-Feb-10
blah blah blah --Roman Dog Bird 01:37, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete If I should die, think this only of me/ that there is some corner of a comedy Wiki that is, forever, deleted. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:04, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Yeah. Just not funny. Takes way too long. Wild at Heart 20:49, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Template:Fictional Colours, used at the bottom of this article, is a navigation tool to scatology, randomness, and a few useful pages that nevertheless don't relate to one another. Spıke¬ 01:48 11-Feb-10
Delete. Ramblin' wizard tales of the high seas. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:55, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This aimless essay with hints of Star Trek: TNG would be good, if scrambled were funny. Spıke¬ 00:10 11-Feb-10
Delete. Get your nonsense right at least. Picard is French. Doubt his ancestor woulda been serving on a British ship. -Not a Star Trek fan at all 00:21, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Seems to have been written with absolutely no concept in mind. pillow talk 00:22, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This article is solely about how much something sucks, but it sucks at describing how much it sucks. Also: listcruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:09, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Badly written and unfunny as well. The author doesn't even say where 'Little' Wigan Athletic football club is supposed to be as if everyone in the world should know (it's in Lancashire, England in case anyone doesn't know). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:58, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I actually live in Wigan, and I have to say, this doesn't even begin to convey how much of a cesspool it is. If only we could huff the actual town of Wigan. --Matfen 16:49, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
For. Nary a Taco Bell in the whole county, probably. Spıke¬ 00:12 11-Feb-10
Heh, I used to vet this article but I guess it got out of hand recently. I'll try and fix the problems and get it back in the mainspace, it's my duty as a Little Wiganer! -- HindleyiteConverse 13:34, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Hmm, turns out most of the content was mine. Guess I'm a shite writer then. Ego-bashing FTW? -- HindleyiteConverse 13:42, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Nobody cares about your dirthole town, even fewer care about the chavs in your dirthole town. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:57, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. If you're going to crap on a town you don't like, it least try to be original besides going on about chavs. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:31, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Be fair, Romartus. Article has grues as well. Spıke¬ 11:56 10-Feb-10
Keep. I love the intro; it just needs a heavy expansion. I might work on it myself if I find the time. —PaizuriMUN♦Talkpage♦My Contributions♦06:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Keep This is really quite good. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:05, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Pelargonium will fix it. But changing the point-of-view and turning it into an essay of reminiscences, based on a nonsense product, is a risky approach and will take a lot of work. Spıke¬ 22:11 11-Feb-10
Delete
Delete.The world's oldest kite related joke in stub form. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:06, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Belongs in UnDictionary. It's far to short. Unlike my penis. Although that should also have an entry in UnDictionary. MrNFork you! 01:56, Feb 11
Comments
Either huff the footnote or huff the article. Sarcasm that needs to be labeled is poorly written. Spıke¬ 23:33 5-Feb-10
Comment! The IP who originally made this is eerily close to this guy, which makes me think there might just be hope for this article. —PaizuriMUN♦Talkpage♦My Contributions♦23:55, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Okay, I'm expanding the article. It's not the best article out there, but I'm trying to keep the tone of the article constant, and I didn't have any better ideas. Thoughts? —PaizuriMUN♦Talkpage♦My Contributions♦07:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Weak Keep Has more to do with how to become a ninja than, say, HowTo:Take Over The World has to has to do with taking over the world. It works in that dopey "Real Ultimate Power" sort of way. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:23, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. At first I was like "This idea is probably worth having a page on" but then I was like "Oh wait, I don't have Down's syndrome" and finally I was like "If we need a page like this, this certainly isn't it". If somebody wants to do something with this, their userspace would be a good place. Otherwise, just delete this and we can all forget it ever happened. -OptyCSucks! CUN18:18, 30 Jan
Delete. I notice this comes with a template that links it to a whole raft of articles which are as probably shit-stupid as this one..The horror..the horror...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:16, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete Close but not good enough to keep. Ninjas are such an important subject we need a better HowTo than this, which is kinda an embarrassment. MrNFork you! 00:40, Feb 3
Delete. Count is right: this is Real Ultimate Power. The difference is that that website is funny and this article is a pathetic knockoff. pillow talk 23:22, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
Delete This is so bad. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:16, February 6, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - Agree with the above three above votes. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 19:19, Feb. 10, 2010
Comments
I think that, thanks to Real Ultimate Power and the like, the idea that ninjas = awesome is sufficiently ingrained in our society so that someone can say that ninjas are awesome without being completely derivative of Real Ultimate Power. This article is certainly among the same lines, but it's not like the jokes are copied. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 19:06, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Thoroughly awful. But isn't it amusing how the Japanese think that "hence" is a word we actually use? Spıke¬ 04:05 10-Feb-10
9005cruft - So horrible it's almost, nope, still horrible. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 04:41, Feb. 10, 2010
Delete.}. Too bad to fix and unless you have a clue what this is about, a pointless rewrite job as well. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:53, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. An headache inducing, unfunny spew of a read. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:31, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Sailor Sun, Sister Moonie? Typical bad fan work derived from a dodgy source to begin with. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:52, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Stupid and unfunny. Wild at Heart 21:41, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
Delete <insert joke about Sailor Sun going down here> -OptyCSucks! CUN00:11, 10 Feb
Comments
"If the sun goes down, whole solar system could go down too." Foreigners say the darndest things! The English is horrible, but you know I have a soft spot for horrible English. Abstaining until I figure out what these articles are about, if anything. Spıke¬ 21:02 9-Feb-10
Delete. Patchy and wibble heavy, even the few older versions I checked were not very good. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:21, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - Full of pointless drivel. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 10:55, Feb. 9, 2010
Delete. The article about the NBA's mammoth Chinese star is sporadically brilliant ("Like most things that are made in China, Yao breaks easily," a stereotype and an allegory on Yao's career) but most of the time it's just stereotypical, as though the author thought dropping Yao's name a lot would save the article. Section 6, from its encyclopedia clichés to nonsense, is pure fail. Spıke¬ 21:02 9-Feb-10
Delete. per Spike. Wild at Heart 21:42, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
Keep What? I think you will find this is actually rather funny. No? OK, well I loaded the page, looked at the picture and laughed. That's good enough for me... Also, it's not written by an idiot, and could be very good IMO. MrNFork you! 00:32, Feb 3
Keep. I've seen worse. Like what I saw between <insert name here>'s mom's legs last night. That was just fucking sick. It looked like the innards of a carved pumpkin on what was once a vagina...like some sort of hysterectomy gone wrong where they just left it all hanging out instead of throwing it away. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK]02:29 Feb 3 2010
Keep Sadamio is the best video game character ever made.he will blow you all up with his missles.jupiterfox 22:07, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. The very title makes me want to cry. -OptyCSucks! CUN00:02, 3 Feb
Delete. Actually rather funny? No. --UU - natter11:33, Feb 3
Delete. Intro is childish. For those who plow forward, the very first idea is "huffing kittens." The article has nothing real to say before it descends into listcruft. Spıke¬ 01:37 4-Feb-10
Delete. - It's been here so long it feels nostalgic reading it. Concept could work if written just right. This, however, isn't. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 10:57, Feb. 9, 2010
Typoes and grammar (except for the article title) are the least of this article's problems. I would fix them right now if I understood the point. This is dreck on a much more literate level than most of our usual dreck. Spıke¬ 02:01 9-Feb-10
Thanks. That's ed zachary what I was trying to say. Wild at Heart 02:20, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Author's idea of humor is to nag me by name in the very first sentence. In fairness, I did look beyond--and saw Chuck Norris. Spıke¬ 23:51 8-Feb-10
EXTERMINATE! what the above people said. Wild at Heart 03:23, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
Nomination - I couldn't decide if this was very amusing are just crap, so I'm letting the sages at VFD judge it. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 21:42, Feb. 8, 2010
...and delete - So SPIKE won't think I get special treatment. ;) --Kip > Talk•Works•• 23:34, Feb. 8, 2010
Delete. It really is crap. Intro: Ungrammatical, tone shifting between encyclopedic and exclamations, nonsense dates, memes, lots of misspellings. What follows is a series of garbage, apparent vandalism, the article jousting with itself, conspiracy theories, it goes on and on, and there is utterly no theme. Spıke¬ 21:54 8-Feb-10
I decree that this is, rather than being very amusing, "just crap." pillow talk 22:23, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
I pulled the old "I can't decide, y'all decide" routine and got yelled at for it. Spıke¬ 21:54 8-Feb-10
Where I come from the term is "Shit or get off the pot". I'm calling it a delete regardless. Just like I count abstain as keep. You think most of us admins can read anyway? MrNFork you! 22:05, Feb 8
Weak delete. Doesn't sink to the level of most of the dreck that we review, but it is ultimately an attempt to write an article around a special character, apropos of nothing. Spıke¬ 12:47 8-Feb-10
Delete. When HTBFANJS advised against not creating extraneous alternate versions of Jesus, Hitler or Darth Vader this is exactly the sort of shit they were getting at. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:38, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Again, we create a fantasy character and fill up an article with extemporaneous babble about Him. Spıke¬ 22:33 7-Feb-10
gay gay gay --Roman Dog Bird 22:35, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Somehow, I knew what to expect from this. --UU - natter12:08, Feb 8
Delete. If your starter template is a parody of Transformers then this was doomed to failure in all departments. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:34, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
Ain't. A feeble attempt to create an article about the municipality of Are, Sweden that has nothing to do with the subject matter and lacks actual humor. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:27, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. It's a stretch to say this is "about" Are, as opposed to "a highly classied prison." Maybe it all depends on what the definition of are, are. Spıke¬ 22:37 7-Feb-10
Delete. Substandard stub. --
My Neighbor Cthulhu
Keep. It's kinda funny. 
Keep. This needs a copy edit. (I'll do it if no one else wants to. Let me know.) ~ 
EXTERMINATE!
Comment. This would've been great as a parody of 
too young for VFD. I don't see why we shouldn't just follow regular procedure. Someone with the right authority can tag it with an ICU or expand tag. 
Keep after the fact. Boop! ~ 
Delete. I don't get it. 
Abstain. It's acceptable now. --
Smite. Fuck no. —