Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive19

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Advertising that we make up quotes is amusing once, (and horribly abused now) but killing the joke on every other page. Beat as this template beats our quote-creation-humor like a dead horse. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 01:18, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, kill it. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:06, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep I created it. It's simply there to link the "Making up quotes" pages together. If your reason for wanting to delete this is that you don't like the making up quotes pages, then put them all on VFD. This template replaced long lists of "See Also" and "Related Articles" links on lots of pages in the "Making up quotes" series. I don't think that having the articles designated for the making up of quotes has that much to do with there being too many quotes on other pages.
I think moving alot of the crappy quotes off of actual non-"Making up quotes" articles to "Making up quotes" pages would be a better solution. Perhaps an even better idea than that would be to start an UnQuote, similar to UnDictionary, to spoof Wikiquote and move all the content of the "Making up quotes" pages there. --Nerd42 19:55, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Now I know we don't get along, and I don't want to seem like a softie or say anything positive about you, but that's one damn good idea. I mean, if someone else had come up with it. For adding yet another useles appendage to Uncyclopedia, and moving all the "making up quotes" stuff to Uncyclopedia:QuoteUnquote. I'm going to hack a page up there now, since I'm feeling ambitious. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 01:25, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL! - --Steve "Heeeere's Johnny" Ballmer 20:20, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

(offtopic flamefest moved to User talk:JohnnyRaven Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 01:16, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC))

Kill: I'm opposed to the template because it tends to dominate the pages it's on and makes them look lower quality. In fact, for that matter, I'm in favor of fewer templates in general (but that's neither here nor now). --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 13:37, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I've just moved it off all the main article pages, leaving a single wiki link to the related making up quotes pages. The template still exists on the making up quotes pages and it stays that way, it might be ok to leave it be. However, if it makes it back onto any of the main article pages, I will go back to being pro-nukes. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:11, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Organize Dominating the pages -- Unfortunately true. Could that be fixed by redesigning the template to be smaller? I think it would be good if this particular series of pages was very organized, (I am making no statements about the site in general here) so that people could easily navigate between the different people. --Nerd42 15:50, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I have changed the format of the template so that (hopefully) it is less threatening. Take a look. --Nerd42 16:20, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

It's still huge, so even though it's a little sleeker, the problem still exists. I think that there's a good solution to this whole issue, namely put the template on making up quotes pages but not articles about things that are quoted. On the article about the quotee, a single line can be used, as in See Also -> Making up somebody or other quotes. This way, the interlinking will be preserved and there will be no page domination as only a single line will be used. I'm going to go about so implementing and then I'm going to change my vote. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 17:36, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

OK then. I'm happy with this. I think the Uncyclopedia has now been made better. :) You might want, however, to make sure the biography articles are all still categorized as Category:People for whom Quotes are Made up. --Nerd42 18:19, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I went and did that .... so, uh, what do you think now, Famine and Cap'n Ben? --Nerd42 21:16, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)
1 - it's unnecessary, since people wanting to go from one making up quotes page to another can just go via Catergory:People for wom quotes are made up. 2 - It's still horribly large and unweildy. 3 - Don't be a drama queen. I could understand you getting upset if we talking about huffing some long article that you put a lot of thought and effort into; we're talking about a template. Just get over it. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 22:55, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)
I'm not upset. :) The trouble with Category:People for whom Quotes are Made up is that very few people would know that -- who's going to click a category -- especially if it's only one of the fifteen-or-so categories the article is in -- whereas if there's a list of links there to the other "Making up quotes" pages, it becomes much easier to navigate, and people realize there are other pages out there besides Making up Oscar Wilde quotes. --Nerd42 23:39, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Nerd, you still miss the entire fucking point - why are we advertising that the quotes are made up? They are not made up. They are true. 112% true. Mislableing them is inappropriate and irresponsible. Not to mention that lots of people click on categories, based on the amount of reverts I have to do to category pages.
Check out Wikiquote so you can help me parody it well at Uncyclopedia:QuoteUnquote. The quotes are real, and we need to make sure that we tell people that. Let us leave behind the silliness of Uncyclopedia and create something which will benefit the world. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 00:06, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Wow! Uncyclopedia:QuoteUnquote looks awesome! but wouldn't it be better/easier to just call it UnQuote? Like UnDictionary? --Nerd42 00:35, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

So ... I'm assuming this template will eventually be replaced by something QuoteUnquoteish ... till then it will stay then ... right? or is this vote still going on or what? --Nerd42 22:11, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Delete. Was a (kinda) funny two-liner in the past, has been moved to undictionary, and is now another, but boring, two-liner. ComaVN 10:16, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ok, it should actually just be a redirect to undictionary again. ComaVN 10:17, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)</s>
I've rewritten it. Have a look and see what you think. Strong RadX 20:01, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Looks better. But I still like the undictionary entry better. More concise. ComaVN 11:39, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kept. --KATIE!! 23:24, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Plagiarized from Wikipedia's article on Yeast. --Peder 02:59, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

^^ Not anymore. It is guilty of being stubby though. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

Random Pages

Acid Ammo 21:10, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC): Just clicking on Random Page, I came across such things as:

You should put up a {{vfd}} tag in those articles when you nominate them.ComaVN 10:33, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Powers That Be

Now, now that's just bad.

Keep. it's not that bad. ComaVN 10:33, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Delete, although it could possibly become a template and put on multiple pages randomly. --Ianweller 14:56, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Keep tis a stub but it doesn't give me eye beams --Nerd42 22:12, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)


I tried to laugh, I really did.

Delete. I'm sure you did. ComaVN 10:33, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)</s>
Moved to Undictionary. I thought it deserved to stay..--Ianweller 14:56, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Erik Estrada

The first sentece gives away the quality of the article: "American (possibly Costa Rican, who the fuck knows) television actor."

Delete. it's that bad. ComaVN 10:33, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Huff. --Ianweller 14:56, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Eradicate. C'mon, how much effort did this really take?--King In Yellow 18:34, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)


A few good jokes don't make up for a mostly unfunny article.

Keep, with a hint of rewrite. ComaVN 10:33, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Rewrite. It deserves to be attacked by the strange that is Uncyclopedia. --Ianweller 14:56, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep for now. Needs a rewrite. Dasphoebus 09:05, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Flush. Acid Ammo 23:48, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete. ComaVN 10:57, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep. I actually found it funny, but it may have to do with me understanding swedish and thus understanding the joke ("Ingenstans" is swedsih for "nowhere").--DeathByPie 19:55, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep A subtle joke, but worth it. Could do with expanding.

Keep I came here intending to vote delete, but I didn't know about the Swedish thing. Maybe add a reference in the categories or see also to tip us non-Swedes off --Poofers 02:51, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep. I just added the word definition. --noob

So, this is gonna become the Brazil article, where there are hundreds of sentences in Portuguese mistranslated to English and that doedn't make sense if one doesn't understand the language. Acid Ammo 15:39, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I deleted it because I don't believe in democracy. --KATIE!! 23:19, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Go. That, my friends, is what we call not worthy for Uncyclopedia.

  • CUT!!! - Guest 18:54, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • I deleted this once, so I guess I'll do it again. Baleeted. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 20:02, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

This page is crap DELETE!!!

Deleted again? --KATIE!! 23:12, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Pages for deletion/UndictionaryA-C - Pages for deletion/UndictionaryD-K - Pages for deletion/UndictionaryL-R - Pages for deletion/UndictionaryS-Z

A dumping ground for useless substubs that admins haven't bothered to delete. (see individual entries) --Carlb 08:06, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • I'm confused, can we just vote to delete the entirety of the Undictionary? If so, than I say kill the whole damned thing! By definition, the Undictionary can be nothing more than a collection of one-liners. That's great if you're Ambrose Bierce, but there's a really good chance it doesn't work if your name consists of a random string of dot-delimited numbers, each one <= 255. Since Uncyclopedia Is Not Wikipedia, who cares if we have a few (or more than a few) sub-stubs in the main article space? I'd rather have an article space with a bunch of funny substubs, than an Undictionary full of unfunny one-liners. Damn, I've wanted to get that off my chest for a while. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 16:42, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Comment: Presumably, any page is fair game for VfD. (and no, I'm not going to VfD the main page as we have admins insane enough to actually go ahead and delete it) --Carlb 16:47, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I vote to go ahead and purge whatever's not funny. --Algorithm 22:35, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep. SOmetimes there's good stuff that simply can't be extended beyond a one-liner. Who said one-liners can't be funny? --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 00:28, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete Crap, Move Rest Back To Uncyclopedia. Take UnDictionary Out Back, Beat It, Shoot It, Jump Up And Down On It, Belittle It's Parents, And Then Bury It Face Down In An Unmarked Grave

“It's not the size of your page, but rather the motion of the ocean, er I mean its humor.”
~ Oscar Wilde on Humor over Size

As a member of VFUDD I say kill it baby! If it makes you laugh even just a little then it's qualifies for Uncyclopedia. People can expand it or not as long as it's funny. When I came across Laos it was one line that said, "A beautiful southeast asian country that anglocentric Americans should learn more about" (Which was actually a decent one liner). Of course I killed it to add 6 pages of crap, but that's irrevelant. I learned the hard way to add pictures and at least three lines in order to keep the UnDictionary Nazis away from my stuff. See Bizarro Coke, and Non sequitur

Delete --Overlordzoloft 02:22, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comment: At least half of the Undictionary entries should be huffed on sight, but for the rest: if there's an existing article on any related topic, should that one bit of text be taken out of Undictionary entirely and merged to the main article? (for instance Undictionary:D#D-Bay to eBay?) --Carlb 16:47, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Ammendment: Keep UnDictionary, but only for actual definitions of words that are funny. Could possibly only take up one page. I'd still like to see an UnQuote kind of thing to parody WikiQuote. --Nerd42 17:09, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep Some of that is funny, and hey, we're not paying for server space ^^ Scythe33 02:55, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Undictionary is just unwieldy, REDIRECTS don't work right, and half of the entries would (and should) have been deleted if Undictionary hadn't ever existed. I'd rather see the funnier entries survive as stubs and huff the rest. --FlyingFool 20:52, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ameri'an language

This probably should have been put out of its misery sooner, but was apparently expanded on request. It still sucks; delete. --DWIII 06:37, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bah. Balete. "...coisinences?" ----OEJ 16:02, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Comment: The page's author,, recently removed the VFD template. I've reverted the removal unless voting has already been decided upon ? MadMax 04:30, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: The VFD tag has again been deleted by the author. Would it be fair to assume the current voting is for deletion ? MadMax 06:06, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kill. Just another stupid limey/canuck trying to bash America, and once again it's not funny.

Deleted. --KATIE!! 23:09, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/templates

There are an awful lot of templates that need voting for/against, please do your civic duty and tell the admins what sucks. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 01:23, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Factual. Poorly written. Not funny. Looks like a work of an ultra-nationalist Armenian. Unissakävelijä 11:09, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

After a month on VFD there has been considerable progress. I thank those who took the time and rewrote. It is no more nationalist, factual or poorly written. But still it lacks humour. Needs more rewrite but for now I withdraw my deletion proposal and vote to keep.--Unissakävelijä 20:37, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Doesn't look that bad to me. Keep. I, for one, welcome our new ultra-nationalist Armenian overlords. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 19:09, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

DELETE NOT FUNNY. Patriots are crap. Who cares about such a small country?

DELETE - who the hell thinks this is funny?!?

BORING Delete--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 00:22, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep It can be salvaged, needs Template:Accurate, besides Armenian chicks are Hawt, and its cool having a country were every damn persons' last name ends in 'ian'. It's also funny how Armenians constantly fight oveBold textr who's a 'real' Armenian and who's really a Turk with 'ian' added to the back of their name. Wiki Tiki God 15:19, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Did a major rewrite please take the VFD tag off now. Wiki Tiki God 09:05, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • KEEP needs some work but its not that bad--Joseph Stalin 18:43, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Revert War This guy keeps putting back the original text for "History of Armenia" which was the major lameness that led to the VFD tag in the first place. I've had to revert it now twice. If you go look (to delete or take vfd tag off) check the history for the latest version NOT by before you make your decision. Or the latest version by me.
    Wiki Tiki God 01:25, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

DELETE Racial hatred? No thanks. Neo-Nazis and Extremists would be proud about some articles in the Armenia section. SAD, JUST SAD.

DELETE Badly written, neonazi slur. Who does this doesn't know that it isn't funny it's just plain stupid and childish --Vladino 03:13, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kept. Looks fine to me. --KATIE!! 23:05, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Slime Cube

Nuke: It was funny at Time Cube, but it's not funny here, even with a search and replace Time/Slime. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 03:06, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Hurts my eyes. Vote for Delete, but I won't swing the axe myself (yet) mostly 'cause there are a lot of contributors. Maybe they can explain the joke? -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 16:03, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep It's a meme joke, what you gonna do? --Poofers 01:58, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

zelete--Spintherism 06:16, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite same visual style, D&D slime/gelatinous cube content. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 17:23, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Wot Famine Said--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 00:23, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bettered - Still needs some TLC, but I beat on it a bit. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 01:11, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kept because I love the colors and stuff. --KATIE!! 23:02, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Destroy the Foreigners!

  • I say pwn all the foreign-language templates instantly back to their own-language Uncyclopedias. They have their places there, not here. Democracy shall decide the fate of the rest! Karma Llama 03:23, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Hell yeah! --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 00:30, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Category: Uncle Joe's College

  • Kill: This is a completely unnecessary subcategory. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:19, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Deleted. --KATIE!! 23:00, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Category: Wheeling Jesuit University

  • Keep the category, but the category page itself should be trimmed to a short meaningful description only (transfer excess baggage to Wheeling Jesuit University). --DWIII 02:33, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kept. --KATIE!! 22:57, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Custard blankets

Eat blankets=funny? Not only that, but it's a false Front Page Nominated. Acid Ammo 23:17, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep due to lots of edits by logged-in authors. They may be trying for something, so I'd give them the benefit of the doubt. However, they do seem to spend an inordinate amount of time reverting edits by for some reason. I even joined the reversion bandwagon myself. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 23:17, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Update: The owner of the IP addie above appears to have some sort of morbid fixation on the article, and has again vandalized it in some minor but annoying way. So, he's banned for a while. This may be enough reason to Keep the article -- in between annoying vandalism, additional content keeps sticking to the blanket like flies sticking to Your Mom. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 18:33, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Retarded, but I kept it. --KATIE!! 22:55, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Hayden Lake

  • Sink it. Unfunny. :( --Carlb 19:48, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Sometimes brevity is the soul of wit; in some cases, it's evidence of an insubstantial idea. Burn it. Burn it down.--King In Yellow 21:28, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Deleted. --KATIE!! 22:52, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Harry Krishnas

Delete. Stubby and not funny. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

I kinda liked it. Reference to gravy and meat may be parody (though it could just be a lucky accident, too). Keep and move to Hare Krishna (ref wikipedia:Hare Krishna). -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 23:13, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kept. Hare Krishna redirects to it now. It's got potential, I guess. --KATIE!! 22:50, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Graham Coxon

I almost huffed it, but just in case, I googled it. Turns out that the guy is a member of the band Blur (I must have missed them while listening to Asleep at the Wheel). He's even warranted one of these crazy things: Wikipedia:Graham Coxon. So, does that mean that this article stays? It could use a little work, but then, couldn't we all. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 21:49, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

gah! The man's a musical genius but nevertheless i've read funnier obituaries than that article. Rewrite please, some kind soul with more comedy talent than me. And if we can't do that, get out the two-by-four and prepare for whacking season. Then huff it. Karma Llama 01:22, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - verifiable Peter 12:23, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Rewrite. Coxon deserves a better effort than this. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:27, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Requested rewrite. --KATIE!! 22:46, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Delete I don't care if it's an inside joke. It's a dupe of Vitamin (without the I's). --Clorox Icons-flag-us MUN ONS (diskussion) 00:27, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete or at least change the font --RaRanax 00:44, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Hasn't this been discussed before? And didn't someone bring it up again about a week ago? --Paulgb 01:03, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Maybe, but it's still there. --Clorox Icons-flag-us MUN ONS (diskussion) 01:19, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

If I remember correctly, the decision was keep each time --Paulgb 03:32, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Oh, its in the village dump right now. I don't understand this...

(VD Discussion)
It's an inside joke! Keep it, for god's sake! You'll never understand! --Clorox Icons-flag-us MUN ONS (diskussion) 02:36, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
(Next day, VFD Discussion)
Delete I don't care if it's an inside joke. It's a dupe of Vitamin (without the I's). --Clorox Icons-flag-us MUN ONS (diskussion) 00:27, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)
... split personality?

You got a problem with that? At least I fixed it. --Clorox Icons-flag-us MUN ONS (diskussion) 21:47, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete You Have Two Dicks was a much funnier copy-and-change-something article, and even that couldn't be saved. --EvilZak 21:08, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete We have AAAAAAA now, we dont need this article --Nytrospawn 00:01, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep I have gone to delete this article 3 times now. Each time I feel guilty for thinking about deleting it. It's not fantastic, but it's not bad. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 02:40, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep: It's funny in that, I don't get it kind of way. It might be nice if there were an explanation of what the hell is going on. It might also be funny to make Vitamin redirect to it and have the 'i'less article be the real one. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:01, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep The joke is that in the entry for the letter "I", there's a line that says "Vitamin without I's presence would merely be vtamn." Thus, the lack of "I"s in the article. --Putz 07:25, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kept. I like it. --KATIE!! 22:42, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

32 Quote templates at Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/templates

See this subpage for a list of 25 canned quotes and a variety of variable quotes. Culling time! Please vote on that page. --Splaka 10:34, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC) P.S. Should we have a separate folder permanently for templates specifically? They have their own VFD template, and that template could link people there to 'save' their favorite quote.

As a trial balloon, I've created the template:AnyPersonQuote this morning. This template can allow writers to put in any less-common quote-person's name for the quotation and could allow writers to have a variety of quoter-names while keeping down the number of different templates. (And it would save having to copy and paste code each time.) I'm not sure if such a template already exists (perhaps it already does somewhere) and whether this template would be of interest to others. --Ogopogo 14:51, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I made something like that at template:Quote.Redirect one to the other.--Foo21 17:40, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I say we use the "any person" template. Garby 03:53, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I never saw, and still don't see the over-abundadnce of quote templates as a problem ... --Nerd42 14:56, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Same here --Willy on wheels! 23:33, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The People of Moldova

Stupid --Willy on wheels! 16:44, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

This is totally in spirit with that delightful mess that constitutes Uncyclopedia's world-famous Romania series of articles. KEEPSIES! --DWIII 04:23, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kept because I trust DWIII. --KATIE!! 22:34, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Coprolites (Fossilized Crap)

Taking a look at Special:Ancientpages turned up an interesting web (heh) (you'll get it later) of stories that I think are ripe for the huffing.

I'd like to KILL THEM ALL!!!1``1!! um, sorry, I mean I would like to suggest their removal as part of a healthy hygeine regimen. I don't think their author will mind, as he hasn't come to visit since April. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 23:22, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)


I thought it was funny, eg [[1]], but others don't agree. What say you? Juan Kerr 10:48, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I think its got a lot of potential....but then I work in a related industry to Marketeering -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Keep. I think it's incredibly hilarious.
However. If a lot of people don't understand the joke and we have to compromise it, I think if we somehow make a reference to game systems it would work better. (GameCube, GameBoy, PlayStation, XBox) Especially since Uncyclopedia's visitor profile pretty much matches gamers. (Dudes, adolescent to early twenties, it's so true.) --neoEva88 20:19, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)
One week later, two people like it and nobody else cares. I'll put the references to this template back into those pages. Juan Kerr 12:29, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Meh. --KATIE!! 22:33, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)


2 edits, same user, one month apart, no work in the last month = Broken Pencil. -- T. (talk) 05:39, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep It's aabout Numpad8 for god sake what do you expect Monty Python?!?--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 00:19, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep and hexxadecimate yourself for vfding for such an absurd reason. --Unissakävelijä 21:52, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kept. --KATIE!! 22:31, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

The Real Truth About the Brazilian Political Crisis of 2005

Symbol wtf vote WTF? It's too long for QVFD, but too pointless to keep IMHO. Or do we keep it and add an appropriate "wtf" template? Obviously, though, {{wtf}} isn't the appropriate "wtf". wtf is? -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 20:12, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

... (Actually it is a joke about the mindless - or is it? - concoctment of pseudofacts by mainstream brazilian media, but if you wish to delete it, feel free...) Greetings

Well, that's not a vote, technically, even if you did sign it. Man, I want to KILL (sorry), but the article is *so* long. Can anyone find a way to patch it into Brazil? Or should it just go home with the kittens? -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 20:13, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Deleted because I'm cleaning and it hasn't been merged and Bob3 is a nice guy. --KATIE!! 22:29, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Febrewery and various other fake months

Has gotten out of hand. I have taken measures to attempt to return the teh funnay to Template:Months. I suggest any months not there be merged or deleted. General Specific 15:52, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)

All the above are one-liner stubs that would have been deleted long ago if not for the 23 months template.

Delete I could probably safely delete these, but I might as well leave it open for voting. --—rc (t) 04:02, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Sir AlexMW KUN PS FIYC 17:47, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Merge into one article. They're all one-liners, seems to me like the content should all be combined into some sort of list article. Like, "List of the 13 Months" or something. Alas, I am at school now, but maybe I'll do it later. --neoEva88 20:35, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete --Paulgb 23:48, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Merge into one article' - I like that idea better. --Paulgb 20:44, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Okay, so, here's what I've done so far. I created the Wildean Calendar as a sort of repository for one-liner/stub month articles. I've added most of the months of the month template, however, there are more months that need to be added. The article is in need of a lot of help. The other thing I have noticed is that the articles for actually months seem about as shitty as some of the stubs for made-up months, in some cases they're even worse. So, I propose a Month-Project similar too of Sarducci's Jesii Project. IMO the deletion discussion is over, and so I plan on starting a discussion section for the months in the Village Dump. --neoEva88 23:05, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kept per neoEva.


Delete. This is one of the made-up months I have been working with. The article is a one-liner stub that I don't believe is funny enough to be merged into the Wildean Calendar with the other one-liner months being put in there. --neoEva88 01:34, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)


This article says almost nothing original (try checking out the official website, Welcome To Bucketheadland, and you'll see what I mean) and furthermore the very few original bits are not very funny. The topic itself has some great potential, but it's not being used here. I would support a rewrite. --Zwabaphone 05:07, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete If you know who busket head is this is not funny, if you dont it is only marginaly funny. Burn it to the ground! Illogicalbeats 19:29, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

keep, flag for a rewrite--Sarducci 16:00, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete It's not funny, just stupid --Poofers 22:02, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Re-write A guitarist with a bucket on his head certainly provides more material than this crappy article. I could re-write it, if there are no objections. — 2nd Lt. Sir Edward, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP 22:38, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Deleted. It had its chance. --KATIE!! 22:20, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Was @ UN:QVFD --User:IMBJR/sig 22:02, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

Amy Seymour

Vanity. --KATIE!! 12:05, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Also vanity. --KATIE!! 12:05, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Also also vanity. --KATIE!! 12:05, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete - Now if this were about Henry Winkler, then I would appreciate it more. Jlove1982 22:47, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Sucks. --KATIE!! 02:57, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)


/ban Why do people waste my time? Dasphoebus 09:05, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete Not funny at all. User:Rroe/sig

Delete the page! Slash it's throat! Bash him in! -- Spaceghost

Annihilate. Worthless consumer model. --Andrusi 16:33, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Deleted. --KATIE!! 21:26, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Canadian ninja

Delete. I don't even know where to begin. The article was shit to look at and was filled with spelling errors. I wasted some time fixing it up (don't ask me why). It still sucks. It's stubby, not a WIP. Just huff it. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

Delete It's just like they hashed together some other shit from other pages and made one really unfunny piece of crap. You should be ashamed of yourself. The only thing missing to make it shittier is a stupid not-funny Oscar Wilde quote. Dasphoebus 01:58, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete Does this even qualify as an article? --LaughingManic 18:48, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I added a stupid not-funny Oscar Wilde quote. Huff it. --KATIE!! 01:45, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Dispose of properly. Keep our streets clean! --Andrusi 16:35, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Deleted. --KATIE!! 21:28, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Night of the Broken Arse

Delete Offensive and not in a good way, and not funny. --Yesyesyes 16:01, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete This is a really crappy article. Personally, I don't find raping male pigs funny unless clever word play (and a lot of it) can be deftly woven in. I don't see much deft word weaving going on here. It's just in bad taste and not funny at all. -Ryan

Keep. Anything making fun of Jews is funny. Happy Hanukkah, bitches. -- Shitty McAssrape

Delete and Deleted --Nytrospawn 22:50, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Vice versa

Not going any where to close to true meaning and no one seems interested in rewrite. Could be very funny with rewrite. Without it i say burn it down! --Illogicalbeats

Rewrite. I rewrote the article. Not my best work, but I kind of like it. Another article with the same theme may already exist, but if so, I'll just work it into mine somehow. --ENeGMA

Keep. Nice rewrite.--Unissakävelijä 09:45, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kept. --KATIE!! 22:01, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Absolute Power

Appears to be nothing. About as useful as eating paint chips. --Mosquitopsu 04:30, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

delete absolutely.--Sarducci 16:00, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. No hope fora rewrite or anything, doesn't even deserve to be voted on. --neoEva88 13:45, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Nope President Chronarion has made that article undeletable, or, he'd kill us if we tried to delete it --Nytrospawn 16:03, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Keep as the article that defies the rule (also I think you missed the joke, think about it) --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:42, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Still, delete. You are right, Elvis, that I missed the joke. Here is what I have to say: If I missed the joke, and I'm an active uncyclopedian, what are the chances that any other visitor to uncyclopedia, with no experience editing and deleting, will get the joke?? There is more to the entry than I originally saw, but my opinion remains unchanged that it still fails to help uncyclopedia. --neoEva88 20:41, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Ahhhhhhh but there are levels of initiation </wink> --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 17:31, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep tis funny and if you don't get it, you're a MORON --Nerd42 22:11, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
I get it, all right. But A) what's funny is relative, so don't troll and/or flame, and B) does Uncyclopedia need to be filled with one-liners? but whatever, there are plenty of keep votes, so I imagine it'll stay, even without insulting the folks who don't like the page. --Sarducci 23:56, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • I wasn't serious whan I said that, ok? twas only joking. I didn't get it at first, until I clicked on the history and edit page stuff and saw the comments ... then i got it. Tis funny! keep it! --Nerd42 01:40, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Ok, I forgive you. --Sarducci 13:09, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep, duh. --Algorithm 02:01, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Whoa! I totally missed the joke. I see it now. The article needs something more, though. The humor is a little too subtle. --Mosquitopsu 16:48, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I'd leave it as is. There are already enough articles as subtle as a 2-by-4 to the skull. I appreciate something on the opposite extreme. -- T. (talk) 19:18, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I get it, I just think it's extremely lame. On the other hand, I guess some people might find it funny. I'm sure there's a way to make it funnier and more universally appealing though. So I'm going to vote for a rewrite. --Carlos the Mean 03:40, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

KEPT. --KATIE!! 21:59, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Books and Movies for Nerds

  • Unfunny and vaguely factual. --Sarducci 22:00, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • Expand Being factual actually is funnier. Especially with movies that follow the formulaic plot that was described. In fact, someone make an equation out of it, it sounds like a lark. --Nytrospawn 22:57, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep&Expand It looks like it has an awesome amount of potential. (It strikes a bit close to home for me.) Being quite a bit of a nerd myself, I could probably contribute a lot to it once I find the time. --neoEva88 23:00, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

NRVd to call attention to it. It's useless unless it's expanded, so yes. --KATIE!! 21:46, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Terry McIntosh

Anti-vanity about someone's teacher/lecturer. I was gonna zap it as anti-vanity, but it is in fact sort of amusing. Perhaps we could have a junkpile of anti-vanity articles about teachers and draw upon it to make an article that doesn't suck - David Gerard 18:38, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

CVP? Ask Codeine, if you care that much. --KATIE!! 21:44, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Other Proposed Jesii Deletions

I think these suck. Messiah should at least be flagged for ye old rewrite. --Sarducci 15:02, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Keep(for now) Sony Jesus looks like it could be onto something if someone with a little imagination gets at it.--Distinction 15:57, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Perhaps a rewrite is necessary, but don't delete Jesus Juice. I think we should tie it in somehow with a Pimp Juice article and write about them as modern alternatives to typical fruit juices. I'm pretty busy working on some other articles right now though, but I may do it later if no one else has gotten around to it. --neoEva88 19:17, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
I took A stab At it, Played off of some of the point the writers was going for and left it open to build on and out of. I think we should keep it and lets see who builds from here. --Illogicalbeats

Delete Sony Jesus and Messiah, Keep Jesus Juice --—rc (t) 03:12, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

sony and juice were revised heavily so deserve to be saved. no one seems to think messiah is worth keeping, so delete? --Sarducci 16:05, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)
I've heavily edited Messiah, by, well, taking out all the text. Is it okay now? --Turnip 16:52, 31 Oct 2005

Ehh... kept. --KATIE!! 21:42, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Pure LOTR/fantasy drivel. Who comes up with this stuff, anyway? --Johnny C. Raven 03:37, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Not great, but not as bad as some. Weak keep, even if it's barely worth the iron cores required to store it. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 16:39, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
At least it won't be affected by EMP when the bomb drops next year (whopps was that not for public consumption)--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 17:01, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep , if only for the lesbian joke. It's FR stuff (Dungeons and Dragons) and some fans might appreciate. Don't see a strong reason for deleting anyway, and it doesn't harm anybody. --Alkyne 14:40, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kept. Cause Bob3 said so. --KATIE!! 21:39, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Doesn't make much sense, doesn't seem to relate to anywhere real, seems unfinished -neca 02:04, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC) Delete seems infantile and useless -Drdisque 06:39, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Dumber than Paris Hilton on qaaludes after a trepanning administered by Ron Jeremy's titanium-plated man-stick. Euthanize it, please.--King In Yellow 21:40, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Deleted. --KATIE!! 21:22, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Darth Maul

As it is, it's merely an excuse to show some fanboy-fueled head shot of the character. The text is complete garbage. Delete or Rewrite, but either way it must die.-- 20:45, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I hated the character. It was a pointless distraction from what little plot the movie had left after that stupid floppy-eared thing ate the script. So there's plenty of Uncyclopedia potential, but this article failed to fulfill it. I found its lack of faith... disturbing. Baleeted. urk! gaaak! (thump) -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 21:12, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

  • FWIW, the post-baleetion version of Darth Maul doesn't suck, so whoever gets stuck archiving crap should move this entry. And don't you even *think* about asking me to do the archiving this time around, 'cause me 'n Jose Cuervo are having an intense discussion at the moment and I don't think you want to follow his judgement. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 21:29, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Have I gone crazy, or is this a totally serious article about parsley? --ChosenOne 00:21, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep. You have gone crazy, and this is a totally serious article about parsley. And it's funny. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 17:02, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)


I move that this article takes itself far too seriously for something that purports to be funny. And, indeed, about clowns. It has lasted too long. Dispose of it appropriately... --biggy 00:28, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kept. --KATIE!! 21:37, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)


This is just sad. Huff it. --PinkDeoxys 18:44, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

KINGLER used GUILLOTINE! NINETALES fainted! --Andrusi 16:38, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

William Bryce R. Fulton V

Smell like vanity --Splaka 01:48, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep, I thought it was good

Not even funny vanity. --KATIE!! 20:37, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Alright, granted you can get away with some pretty hairy writing here, but this is just... hateful. There's little humor beyond tired cliches & slurs. I say it's fodder for Deletion, and possibly grounds for a Ban.--King In Yellow 20:56, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Wandering, aimless, crap. Splaka tried to {{NRV}} it, but the anon author took it off and kept on building his house out of poo. Perhaps they figured the stink would keep anyone from Huffing and Puffing enough to blow it down? I'd like to prove them wrong. Besides, nobody (and I mean nobody) links to Moronificatoriationariality. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 21:06, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Baleet. It's crazy, but not crazy enough to be funny.--King In Yellow 21:09, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete. It tries too hard to be funny by using long, fake words. -- Luffy 21:10, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)


(moved from Template talk:QVFD) (note, also affects Template:qvfd)

  • Ok, I can find little purpose in this tag. I say we depricate it. More than once (not just via Suresh, heh heh) I've had to huff a QVFD article twice because someone else added the tag moments after I huffed it. Thoughts? --Splaka 00:34, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Agree (and not just because we're talking about it on IRC). QVFD == "instahuff", not "go to the trouble of putting a template on it and inviting discussion and generating history". -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 00:40, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Agree. -- T. (talk) 00:45, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Agree'ed because you all have longer sigs then me, and are therefore much more important then me --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:20, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Against This is not the proper place to list this template. Please use QVFD instead. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 01:42, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Sorry? Things get marked and/or voted upon? I just delete them. Adding templates kills electrons, and makes baby jesus cry. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 23:19, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)


  • What is this shite? Is it vanity or stupidity? Maybe stupid vanity, or vain stupidity. Ah, who the hell cares, it's not amusing at all. Huff it, please.--King In Yellow 16:04, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

It is funny because it's stupid. Still not funny enough really. |)31337 unless someone further disgraces it. --Unissakävelijä 21:40, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Mary hedrick

  • What the heck is this then? no en.wp, low google hittage, smell like slandanity. --Splaka 04:14, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

PWN this excrement, please.--King In Yellow 15:26, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

  • Huff, puff and blow this article down. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:33, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Execute along with her bastard brother Marc Summers, created by the same IP addie. He may be non-non-notable, but the article is crap. Runs in the family, I guess. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 23:41, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ninja cobras

Delete. Was considering putting it into Types of Ninjas, but I think this article is just a waste of space. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

British Intelligence Service

Wikipedia could be funnier.--Whywhywhy 11:38, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Arnold Oksmaa

Appears to be semi-notable Estonian vanity. With creepy pictures. --—rc (t) 07:34, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Huff: Few google hits, no wikipedia hits (english or estonian). -- Splaka 07:37, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Vaporize: Not one shred of humor, and slimy pics to boot. Blech.--King In Yellow 21:01, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Cremate this phääk! --Unissakävelijä 22:55, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Killzor --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:49, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Some poor kid's got some major issues to work through. Let's help him out by Deleteing this before the school bullies see it. --Putz 21:22, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Delete. My own article, I'm merging it with Making up numbers. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

In this case, use QVFD for near-instaneous results. It's ok if you're the author, and you've moved the content elsewhere. BTW, the Making up numbers article comes along well. Far better than the slew of pages you had before. Nice work - it's almost articlerific! Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 00:57, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

List of Pokémon who resisted the Holocaust

Meh --Splaka 06:58, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete --—rc (t) 07:06, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete reluctantly I like the idea. The title's funny. But the entire article sucks for everyone who isn't a level 345935491237648123534252825352835782345234573425782365782365823568 Pokemon Master --Nerd42 03:23, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

delete it's just a list... there's not humour. at all. --Oracleoftruth 03:32, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Interesting concept, but not really worth its own article. Move content to Pokemon, and while you're at it, combine that with the much funnier Pokémon, but be careful not to create Mewtwo in the process, because that's one bad-ass Pokeyman, and you do not want to fuck with him. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 23:14, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

agrees with the third Bob but not the other two --Nerd42 23:16, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete to Hell! The VFD for this page is funnier than the page itself. --DaveDark

Delete. I don't see any point to this. --Abwayax 06:22, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete. It's drivel from some fanboy, and completely devoid of humor. I agree, though, it could be made into something hysterical if someone took the time to put some actual work into it.--King In Yellow 21:04, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kevin zhou

Smell like slander/vanity. No en.wp article, few google hits. --Splaka 04:40, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Can't we let it stay for just a few days? -- 05:27, 11 Dec 2005

Register and move the page contents to your user page if you want to keep it. Delete --—rc (t) 07:06, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Repatriate to the poverty-stricken island nation of Miscapitalize'. I'd have huffed it myself if I'd have seen it before it made it to the shores of VFD. But once they land on the beach, you gotta let 'em have their hearing. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 23:21, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Frag it before it establishes a solid beach head!--King In Yellow 21:07, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Miles Brown

Screw - I stumbled across this while randoming. I did a quick Google to see if it was a credible satire, but the results were impotent. It's probably some in-joke about some high-school kid. Screw it please. -Black-Velvet 13:03, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Another refugee from the good ship Vanity. There are a number of edits (by anon IP's), spread over time, but contemporaneous links from 1977 imply that it's vanity, along with the eminently huffable Tudhail and The Hobo Prince. I think the whole boatload is eligible for Burial at Sea. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 23:28, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Sink 'em.--King In Yellow 21:08, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Crap, but has too much history for QVFD. --Infobacker 17:45, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Template:Mortal Enemies

In my view, this is a pointless, obtrusive template - --Ogopogo 07:38, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

HUFF, HUFF, for the love of God, HUFF I hate stupid link templates. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:21, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Delete - Obviously written by highschool students living in Saskatoon who wanted to make their city and school appear wicked awesome. Not even a single attempt at humour--Blingblang 04:59, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kill --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:20, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

N00k.--Hobelhouse 05:31, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

All caps

Kill: I don't think it's funny, but some of you might. At the very least it should be moved to ALL CAPS. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:30, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

MOVE AS SUGGESTED BY GWAX--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 15:34, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

MERGE TO CAPS LOCK!!! --Carlb 21:14, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete It's funny because the title says "All caps" and then it's written in all caps. --EvilZak 00:00, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Kill: Pretty crappy in my opinion. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:07, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite. It's zany enough to make for a good piece, if someone with the brainpower of a gnat got ahold of it.--King In Yellow 21:22, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep & rewrite a little --Nerd42 22:18, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kill Them All

-Delete All Add my vote to the Delete columns for all of this shite! --[Sir Slackerboya CUN VFH (talk) 04:43, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The new jersey monster

A completely mindless post that adds nothing to the site and has absolutely no humor value. --Black&white 21:23, 7 Dec 2005
i second this deletion. i only added stuff because i was bored. i am totaly ashamed for doing so. --Neko 19:12, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC) Destroy it like a six pack on a warm summer afternoon. It's terrible. --Damaged Too 03:00, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Blow it straight to Hell This is too weak to even qualify as random insanity. It sounds like something a tweaked 5th grader would write.--King In Yellow 18:43, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Not in America's best interests

Marked for rewrite per sort-of-consensus. --EvilZak 23:50, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Americans are dumb, and they like war. Clever social commentary! Delete --EvilZak 14:55, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Nuke.. -_- -- 18:36, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete on the grounds that this article is not in America's best interests. --Nerd42 20:08, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep. It is not an amazing article, but it is not terrible. It has been around a while (and has received a few administrator edits) and is not taking up any valuable namespace. --Sir KP GUN 22:52, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep. It's sorta funny. Needs more cowbell. --DaveDark

The introduction needs a rewrite (and a good dose of dry, parodic humour). But overall, it's fairly good. Keep. --Careax 06:24, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

It may be true, but I don't find it funny. But if someone took the time to clean it up and make it funny, it might turn out better. Keep for now --Abwayax (contribs :: talk) 22:01, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Tis just a crappy list, huff it. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:50, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep, at least for a little while - I'll see what I can do in terms of cleaning it up and making it good. I think the idea has merit, but if you still think it sucks in, say, a week, then I have failed in my attempt to make it funny and, by all means, huff teh bitch! --Oracleoftruth 02:32, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Fascist America

Deleted by someone --—rc (t) 05:27, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Repeated political ranting with no attempt at humor by --Sifter 20:00, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Give 1 week for rewrite An attempt was made at humor. Drastically needs improvement to save it though .. I'd say if there are no major changes within a week my vote, (for what it's worth) will change to delete. --Nerd42 20:45, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Deleted --—rc (t) 05:27, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. Seems to be private in joke, untouched since creation in October... --DaveyR 22:39, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - vanity nonsense! HUFF! --Toilet24 20:41, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Deleted --—rc (t) 05:27, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Vanity? Could it be teacher vanity? Splain! --Splaka 23:21, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete. I can't stand those "if it's weird, it's funny" articles. Surrealism is an art form not easily grasped, it seems. ComaVN 10:20, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Keep. I think it's pretty funny. --Ianweller 14:52, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Keep. You got to be there! Really funny!
Keep. This is trully inspired humour! Shrink to fit in an aeroplane? LOLOL! --Zoom 21:28, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Kept and featured --—rc (t) 17:56, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC) Kept? Why?? Acid Ammo 20:00, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Why? Because it's a featured article. --—rc (t) 06:41, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
That's outrageous, but meh. Acid Ammo 15:18, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
This has poisoned Uncyclopedia by getting featured. We need to delete it and act as though it was never featured. It's the only way to save Uncyclopedia. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 12:49, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Noobs. Only true Uncyclopedians like me and RC get the true genious of this artickl. --Savethemooses 23:54, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Discussion moved from QVFD -- <s>Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 17:43, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

  • Meets ALL SIX deletion criteria. In doing so, it scores a bonus point taking its score up to 7 deletion points. unsigned
  • Dios Mio! This thing is VFH and QVFD at the same time? Quick, huff this crap! --Infobacker 15:29, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)



Kept --—rc (t) 05:11, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Huff: Yeah I know some people like this sort of thing but it's not funny and it's certainly not as cool as AAAAAAAAA!. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 00:23, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep. Not as good as AAAAAAAAA!, but still AA! material. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 00:59, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep. And Undelete Meow.--Naughtyned 19:56, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete I believe the previous voters mistyped their votes. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 01:19, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep Meow (if there are any pussy pics for it) and delete Fghdfgbdfb. --Carlb 03:21, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep What Nintendorulez said. — — 2nd Lt. Sir Edward, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP 16:09, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Delete. (I'm raising both my hands, but don't tell the teacher.) I voted to keep 999, but this just goes too far and has no unique redeeming merit. While it has attracted several edits and links, I'm also going to stand on one leg, lift the other, and vote to Delete yet again. So there. -- <s>Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 19:46, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • For some reason, though, I'm compelled to vote Restore on Meow. I've even restored a version on my user space for your reference. As a child of the '70s and '80s, I grew up singing the Meow Mix song! You can't take that from me! -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 20:00, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
And don't forget Henrietta Kitten from Mr. Rogers.--Naughtyned 23:14, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
You just brought a tear to my eye. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 15:30, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Meow has been created, but it's a real article now. Darn. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 23:34, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Cat's meow is still available as a name. --Carlb 21:01, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
That's OK, I already linked the nonsense template to Bob's Meow user page and put a "disambiguation" statement on the new Meow pointing there.--Naughtyned 14:47, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep It's Old Skool--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 00:15, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep Hell if I know why, but it made me laugh, plus it's a total waste of space. --Overlordzoloft 02:24, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep: If it makes User:Overlordzoloft laugh and it's a total waste of space, it's worth keeping. --Ianweller 03:25, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep: The world needs more of this. --Bigrich 07:15, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC) </s>


Kept --—rc (t) 05:10, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete. This article 18:03, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I move that the above vote for deletion be disallowed on formal grounds, because Uncyclopedia articles are not sentient life-forms. --DWIII 23:07, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Undelete save this article it's funny! --Nerd42 23:41, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 00:21, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep --Overlordzoloft 02:27, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep I wouldn't kick it outa bed in the morning Wiki Tiki God 15:10, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

KEEP. Hilarious. --Hobelhouse 03:06, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Edit war (video game)

Delete --—rc (t) 05:27, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

  • Kill: Not anywhere near as funny as the other war games. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 22:07, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete --Putz 06:58, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Fun keep it --Nerd42 03:44, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Delort I don't even think the people referenced in that would understand it. --Syndrome 05:12, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Appalling compared to the other War Games. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:03, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Zork3 and all its subpages

Kept --—rc (t) 05:07, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Zork was fun. Zork2: well, there's gotta be a sequel. But Zork3? Meh. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 18:03, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Who else is going to use the title "Zork3" though? Not nearly as good as Zork, but I like the Grue 2.0, and its not inhibiting anyone. Keep. Zork4 would be pushing it however. No Zork4. Distorto November 18, 2005

Keep: The Grue 2.0 bit alone makes it keep-worthy in my mind. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:59, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I wrote that joke! *smiles* --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 00:31, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep the original Zork Trilogy had three games --Nerd42 03:37, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Games are not of encyclopedia, even a fake one. --User:Anti.exams 16:20, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Deleted --—rc (t) 05:27, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

another AAAAAAAAA! clone --Willy on wheels! 20:32, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep This one's full of girly goodness. -- <s>Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 21:56, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
You can never have enough one-letter-endlessly pages! Hooray for the number 9! Karma Llama 01:27, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep Since it has pictures, its good enough to stay --Nytrospawn 01:42, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Kill Willy's right, its a AAAAAAAAA! copy, no more please. Distorto November 16, 2005
Keep, and undelete BBBBBBBBB! - I want these for every damn letter! Each one is funnier than the last.

Keep, but give a swift kick in the ass to anyone who makes any more AAAAAAAAA!likes. --EvilZak 06:37, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete: Not only is it a clone, but it's not as well done as AAAAAAAAA! If it were better, I'd say keep it, but as is, it's unoriginal and half as funny. Any clone that isn't as good as the first dilutes the quality of the original. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 22:29, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kill It. It sucks. I deleted meow which was yet another of these. Compared to AAAAAAAAA! 999 sucks pretty badly. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 20:31, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep This will give us one number page, one letter page (AAAAAAAAA!), and one page of pure nonsense Fghdfgbdfb. This, plus an infinite number of animal sounds pages, should give Uncyclopedia the correct nonsense page balance.--Naughtyned 23:08, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete --—rc (t) 05:27, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC) </s>


Deleted --—rc (t) 05:27, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Can we delete this one, which is now as bad as Espoo language was, except with 10% more crap? -- <s>Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 19:21, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kill it. --Crilldogg 06:57, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete. --Ruubio 15:34, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete you can only pull so much funny from nonsense before it turns into whatever the hell this is.--AirGunRunner 01:56, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC) </s>

A Perfect Circle (band)

Deleted --—rc (t) 05:27, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Didn't seem funny, and is a mess to look at. If anybody wants to fix this article up, go ahead, but I say burn it. --neoEva88 23:10, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Going against character, I say keep. The band isn't all that bad, and listening to them a little too loud on your iPod is a great way to pick up Goth Chicks. The article just needs a generous sprinkling of capital letters (or maybe they were just whispering so as not to ruin the mood). -- <s>Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 20:32, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Too factual and lacks humor. Basically a fan's history of the group with an obvious attempt and failure at humor (and grammar).--Kleptonis 14:11, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete, please. I would look at this article in a different light if it were actually interesting or humorous. If he made the facts funny, an maybe capitalized a couple letters, well, this article would actually and honestly still be here in VFD. I believe what I am trying to say is that this article has no value whatsover. Huff, please. --Kyle1 00:16, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC) </s>


Deleted --—rc (t) 05:27, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Didn't seem funny, but I wouldn't know, I never finished it. :) --neoEva88 22:52, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete: That's way too dense. Sure didn't make me laugh. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 01:35, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete Unfunny, verbose, nothing links there, and nobody would ever type it in -Drdisque 06:21, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Also never finished this bumblefuck of duckspeak, take some advice from Orwell, "If there is a simpler word that means the same thing, use it."--AirGunRunner 10:07, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Priest of Cthulhu

Killed --—rc (t) 05:27, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I'm a big fan of the mythos and everything, but I don't understand how this could be considered funny. It seems like it belongs more on a Lovecraft fan-site than a humourous encyclopedia... --Malleus 04:34, 23 Oct 2005 (UTC)

deleteI agree --Sarducci20:51, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

-- delete - yeah, it really seems like the author just didn't get the point of uncyclopedia when he made this. --Oracleoftruth 00:14, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

keep So obscure that it's factual, yet weird. --Chronarion 17:46, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

keep Unless anyone knows a Cthulhu wiki we couold tranwiki it too. --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:37, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

delete Whoever wrote this is the only one getting a hard-on from it. --barf 20:14, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Mike Natale

Huff - This article apparently is nothing more than a feeble attempt to convince some fat chick to screw him. --anidnmeno 01:32 EST 05 DEC 27

Give it a chance - Whoa, chill, dude. I think it should stay up. It sounds nonsensicle enough. This isn't an injoke for, like, people in like, some middle school or something. This is for anybody who likes Mike Natale, abstract artist from Chicago. At least, that's wat I believe. Decide for yourself. http://www.wnightingale.com/Natale.html

Delete - It's a vanity page, clear and simple. Jlove1982 14:25, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Huffed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:30, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Sean Williamson

Huff - I vomited after reading this. --anidnmeno 01:35 EST 05 DEC 27

Delete - Can I have the minute of my life back I lost in reading that? Jlove1982 14:23, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Done slander/vanity --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:35, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Huff'er! - This article is pretty much crap. 'Nuff said. --SWNerd 04:00, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Done but for future reference, that probably would have been better handled on Uncyclopedia:QuickVFD or using {{NRV|~~~~~}} --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:48, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Santa Clause

Delete funny stuff, but a stub, I moved it to the Constitution of the United States--k3vin 00:24, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep Clever witty. Perhaps put it up for rewrite? Dasphoebus 09:01, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep & Put it on Probation. And give it a chane. Perhaps it can be expanded, with a history of Supreme(r) Court cases and laws concerned with the Santa Claue. I say give it a day or two, and if it hasn't improved burn it. I'm all about merging funny stubs into larger articles. {User:NeoEva88/sig}}

I just added a little more. Feel free to add more. SenorAnderson 20:08, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep, even if it doesn't change for a while after thsi the Santa Clause lol --Nerd42 19:47, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep! Wry, somewhat witty, and clever. Nice play on words. With all the other sophmoric crap on uncyclopedia that makes no attempt at being funny (How many articles on Gorgons living in the year 3535 do we need) this ones a KEEPER!

Eatten by Santa Claus. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:08, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Personal tools