This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 16:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I have no idea what Siddhartha-Wolf is talking about, but I do know that this is not funny. pillow talk 23:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Probably unfunny in any translation. Shame. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 13:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Comments
I approve of the deletion of this page and would like to add that this article has nothing to do with the Foreign Office and should therefore not be used in any way to sully the reputation of our fine establishment. Please :( I have added an "Anglify" though, just in case it doesn't get deleted. --El Sid,the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 12:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Viva Laughlin
Keep
Delete
Delete Not funny. --—Mazaka(talk) 01:35, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I... uh... wha? --UU - natter08:51, Aug 23
Delete. This is one of those articles that have dropped out of a parallel universe where everyone here is contributing to Gouncyclopedia...You look at it and think..'Where do you start to understand the brain behind this who remotely thought this was ever going to be funny..? .--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 13:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Y'know, this made me laugh. It's just fucking horrible. This is funny as a fail - funny like Mr winkler is GAY. pillow talk 23:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep I liked it. Staircase CUNt 14:15, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep we need a new in-joke. --Mn-z 14:47, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep. It made me smile. And I like pussies--kittens. Third part could use work. Miley Spears 15:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, not good. I'll also accept the non-traditional nomming, since it's practically a single article anyway. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete Come of it. In-jokes are for girls. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. terrible. IronLung 03:26, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Another one for the kiddies page...otherwise , erase said work and write an essay: Andy Warhol Is to Blame for the State of Modern Art:Discuss. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 13:32, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Comments
I'm nomming all three of these together, as two of them are subpages, and it seems pointless to me to have a seperate vote on all three of them. Fix if I'm an idiot. WoodyOnFire!Talking WoodyStalking Woody 18:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
You are an idiot, but you're a clever, funny, lovable idiot. :) Miley Spears 15:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Waldvogel
Keep
Keep. It is a pretty silly article but probably doesn't need culling and stuffing either. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 10:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Weak Delete would be funny on illogicopedia. --Mn-z 15:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I would say keep because it looks like a lazy labour of love, but it's 2 or 3 years old now, so noone really cares... --El Sid,the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 17:06, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Odd, pointless, didn't make me chuckle. Maybe a better fit for ?pedia. --UU - natter10:03, Aug 21
Delete satellite template to the article below. Thankfully its little and little used, but it won't make sense without the Anti-wilde article. --Mn-z 04:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Yay, another worthless template. -OptyCSucks! CUN17:15, 19 Aug
Conditional delete if Anti-wilde is deleted. pillow talk 17:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Kerkill . This is horribly written, not funny in the least, and mainly vanity. It in no way merits exsistence, just like 90% of the YouTube Poop videos... Also, VFD is full again... MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 19:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete... All the videos on this page suck. --—Mazaka(talk) 23:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. we should probably have an article on this, as someone's going to type in the search box. However, I don't think it could get better than a "lets regurgitate someone else's content" article. Articles on intentionally funny things are rarely funny. I think this will probably be recreated better. --Mn-z 04:42, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep. It's not so bad, has some good moments and it's about a real guy (or combination of two real guys) so it's not like it's really random or anything. --El Sid,the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 15:53, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
weak bandwagonish keep per above, and I guessing this article will make more sense to a British person. --Mn-z 16:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Soft rewrite tag. Clever concept, some good lines. Definitely some shite in there, too. pillow talk 19:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Not as bad as people seem to be suggesting, it's based on (what I imagine is) real satire - Lundy Island actually exists, it has "mystical" origins in terms of inhabitance and I wouldn't be at all surprised if there were a Devonish influence culturally. Keep it. --El Sid,the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 15:57, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Real thing, not totally shit article. Keep. MrNFork you! 16:06, Aug 21
Keep. It appears that some people have rewritten this, so it's keepable now. --—Mazaka(talk) 05:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
bandwagon-ish keep rewritten, and the British seem to like it. --Mn-z 05:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Just...no. --—Mazaka(talk) 01:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete.Lundy Island was founded in 603 BC when a group of druids, tired of being persecuted, cut of a large chunk of Devon and towed it out to sea using primitive motor boats. --Mn-z 04:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Also, if you delete this you might as well delete every single British location article there is, I've seen loads worse than this. --El Sid,the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 16:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
I once pushed a girl in front of a bus. And no, that isn't some sort of metaphor. I fucking mean it. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 21:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete
'Delete. because "This is just some random link on the Uncyclopedia:Wilde, and it redirects to here." is the whole article. --Mn-z 04:50, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
'Delete. just because I'm feeling bitchy. (Really because there's nothing there). Miley Spears 15:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete I shagged the burd Dexter pushed in front of a bus. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Template:Red States
Keep
*Weak Keep. {{USstates}} isn't political; this is. However, this was topical during the Bush years. Should we remove Colorado, New Hampshire, Nevada, North Carolina, Indiana, Iowa, and Virginia? After all, they all went to Obama in 2008. pillow talk 17:56, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Yes, but do we need a political and regional state template on ever state page? And states that are on borders between regions could wind up on two or more sectional templates for the same topic. For example, Oklahoma and Missouri could be either midwestern or southern, and Ohio is on the southern states template. We could easily wind up with half a dozen state templates on a single state page. --Mn-z 18:04, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
I'd support consolidating all the templates into one larger USstates template - putting all the sectional and political information in that template. But right now... it's not there. I'd do it myself, but I'm very, very busy working at my job right now. Yep. Verrrrry busy. pillow talk 18:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm going to sort of weakly rescind my week keep in light of Mnbvcxz's updates to the USstates template. I think that template could somehow be funnier - but there's no reason not to consolidate and let the editorial process take care of that. pillow talk 06:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete and redirect to {{USstates}}. I loath partial sectional templates like this, because the do the same thing a full sectional template would, only uglier and half-assed. --Mn-z 17:39, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
also, we have a {{Purple States}} template, but not a blue states one. --Mn-z 18:06, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
And the sectional templates miss the plains states and Minnesota, the midwest only covering the great lakes region and the westen template only covering the far and mountain west. Or in tl/dr form, the regional and political states templates are a mess. --Mn-z 18:11, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
I "merged" the data together in the {{USstates}} template. Hopefully, it can replace all the partial sectional ones. --Mn-z 04:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Keke Rosberg
Keep
Delete
Delete. random as hell, and unnotable foreign (as in from outside the Anglosphere) topic.. --Mn-z 05:26, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. But random dates are funny! Not. (sorry) Miley Spears 16:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep Part of the "what powers Uncyc" series this... MrNFork you! 01:29, Aug 19
Delete
Delete. While it's nice to know what we do in the event of a butter shortage, this is shit. pillow talk 17:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Yes, but the butter shortage, which is caused "when casualties are outnumbering recruitments for both the stormtroopers and the redshirts, and when the wales are preoccupied being hunted by the Japanese" hasn't happened so the device has never been tested. --Mn-z 17:49, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep you make my heart sing. You make everything groovy. In addition, I have now removed 291 Chuck Norris references... Keeping the good ones, but there are THOUSANDS of terrible ones. MrNFork you! 18:16, Aug 17
Point is, this is intended as a "fusion" article, like, say, Pontius Pilot or Taft Punk. This is supposed to fuse the concept of "Wild Thing" and Oscar Wilde. Fusion articles aren't inherently notable, and if they're done badly, they should get the boot.
Fuck 'notable' - if it aint funny it aint funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep. I'd get rid of about 75% of the wishy-washy rubbish that is lurking on uncyclopedia before I get rid of a genuinely novel article like this. It might not be quite as smart as it thinks it is, but it's still pretty fresh and is a pleasant surprise for someone who comes across it by chance. It's not VFH imo, but its closer that than VFD. El Sid,the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 11:53, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Strong keep. It's a good idea, it's being worked on by a good writer, it stays. --UU - natter14:17, Aug 20
Strong keep per above. --Mn-z 14:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep. I think it's better than most of the articles I see on Unc. Of course most of them suck. Miley Spears 15:36, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. While reading the article the first time might give you an initial chuckle, there is nothing else to like in the article. InMooseWeTrust 11:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Additional comment: I can see what Moose is getting at, there is plenty of comic potential for the actual subject of Biology, but this article in itself is good so I can't say "VFD". I would suggest creating an ambiguation page - Biology (subject) and Biology (literature) although it might ruin the impact a little. However, until there actually is a Biology subject page, leave it as it is. --El Sid,the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 11:59, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
And I banned you for it. Don't remove VFD tags while the vote is active even if you placed them - let the vote happen, and an admin sort that out. And don't go making redirects while voting is still active - we vote on the article as it stands. --UU - natter14:17, Aug 20
Kept You Peed on it Moose. Then you nom it for VFD? What the Fuck? MrNFork you! 14:51, Aug 20
Delete a long forgotten about in-joke about a tired in-joke, that, surprisingly (or not) reads like a wikipedia article. --Mn-z 04:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete - Unfunny stump. Most of you probably thought it was an incredibly funny joke in German, but let me assure you it isn't. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 11:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Yeah, that thing I said about German stuff on the other Babel page vote pretty much stands here too. Particularly the bit about the shiteness. --UU - natter14:46, Aug 19
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 15:56, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. English. Speak it. Or die. -OptyCSucks! CUN17:20, 19 Aug
Delete - this is unfunny vanity stuff, we deleted it long ago from the German uncyclopedia. Don't know why it's here. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 11:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. My German doesn't extend too far beyond telling people their mother is a small guinea pig (which is the most useful thing I can remember from my German class, and even then I probably use the wrong genders, tenses and god knows what else - honestly, having masculine, feminine and hermaphrodite words, I think it was, what a language! ;D), but what I do understand of this page tells me it's pretty shite. --UU - natter14:43, Aug 19
Delete. why to we have foreign language content on the wiki anyway? --Mn-z 15:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete.Oscar Wilde invented time. He also invented the first board game and hence time wasting. is the whole article. Seriously. --Mn-z 14:16, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I don't think anyone's going to miss this. If they do, they can read it in the VFD archive. pillow talk 17:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
No. It just has a template that is 10 times larger than the rest of the article. --Mn-z 04:47, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Roling your head on the keyboard/Monkey Style!
Keep
Keep: Funny in its randomness. --Ozymandiaz 11:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Utterly pointless sub-page (that's not a proper sub-page due to poor spelling) that somehow missed being ICU'd, and I want to delete on sight, but suppose I should bring here for the formality. --UU - natter10:32, Aug 18
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 14:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Yeah, I'm so glad that someone came here and graced us with random characters. pillow talk 17:39, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Or leave this monkey on ?pedia's doormat ?--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 18:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Let's see... listcruft, Oscar Wilde, Steve Ballmer, redlinks everywhere, no images, no jokes besides the concept that atomic wedgies have something to do with nuclear weapons, self-references to Uncyclopedia, bold text everywhere. Yup. pillow talk 23:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. and on a related note, somebody needs to write a non-retarded article on wedgies. --Mn-z 16:24, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Weak Keep it irritates me, which I think was the point. --Mn-z 18:31, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep, per above. It's not bad at all actually in places. MrNFork you! 01:50, Aug 14
WEAK Keep In my opinion this article just barely scrapes by in terms of whether or not it's worth keeping. -Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 05:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. This is an absurd fictional depiction of the orchestration of "Born To Be Wild" as popularized by Steppenwolf. Really? Yes, really. pillow talk 17:50, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. its 135 verses long. --Mn-z 17:56, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. In theory, this page could be dumber, although it's hard to see how. pillow talk 17:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Maybe it could be dumber if it had aa enormous fugly gay-looking template linking to equally bad Wildecruft articles at the bottom? No, wait... --Mn-z 17:55, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. It deserves the long walk to the bin. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 18:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Comments
I love its randomness. I can't vote keep though. It's just too short. The template at the end takes up more space than the actual content! —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM19:09, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
World Monocle Wearing Championship
Keep
Delete
Delete You know, I suspect that at least half of the pages with the WildeGuide template on them merit deletion. pillow talk 20:25, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
I would say its closer to 3/4. --Mn-z 21:08, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. and move to illogicopedia. --Mn-z 21:08, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Dick Van Dyke and a monocle ? Ho..ho..NO. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 18:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Gowandaland
Keep
Delete
Delete You know, I suspect that at least half of the pages with the WildeGuide template on them merit deletion. pillow talk 20:23, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. and move to illogicopedia. --Mn-z 21:07, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. ?Pedia piddle ? It has sat on these pages smelling bad so long. Wonder how many saps found this and decided to go to Conservapedia for a real laugh. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 18:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Maybe there's a specific reason for this to be here that I don't see, but it's an unfunny page on a default MediaWiki navigation option that we don't use. pillow talk 23:02, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Its not like some of the bad articles here, where a retard apparently took peyote, but I see it serving no good purpose on this site. -Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 05:19, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. This is shit. It's a series of crappy lists, none of which are funny. "Intentionally offensive", fine, but this is just a series of stupid fucking insults. Mostly, though, it's an insult to us and this site, so let's get rid. Oh, and the history is just as bad, by the way. --UU - natter15:44, Aug 17
Delete. I thought the quote at the beginning was kind of funny. Turns out it's stolen directly from Goldeneye. Then we start blathering about Grishenko marrying Ursula the Sea Witch. Kill it with liquid nitrogen. pillow talk 09:56, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. He was also mysteriously invincible for large spells of the Goldeneye game, as I recall. And he was involved in the Control Centre level that really wound me up as well. Bastard. --UU - natter10:38, Aug 17
Delete Wildecruft. --Mn-z 16:37, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Honestly, I think it's time to trim back a lot of Uncyclopedia's 2005-2006 Wilde-related shit. If we could get Wilde down to, say, 30 articles... that'd be great. pillow talk 20:44, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
its 2009 do you know where your children are? or something. alright, blow me. --Andrew Dice Gay 03:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Pointless categories suck. --UU - natter10:17, Aug 17
Weak Keep not totally worthless. It does parody some of the arcane fictional games in Star Trek. --Mn-z 16:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete As a Star Trek fan, I still don't find it funny. I mean, I understand the intent and the point of the article, but I just don't think it is funny, I don't think the article is salvageable, and don't think it is right for Uncyclopedia. -Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 05:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. A minor modification of some song lyrics. It's difficult for me to figure out how this is supposed to be funny. pillow talk 23:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
yea i dont like stuff like this. no offense to tenacious d, they're cool in my book for being friends with neil hamburger. but that doesn't matter, this article is still lame. —RomanDogBird (Talk•Morgan Freeman•eat my shorts nigga•Hawkman•suck my balls) 23:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete Bringing up vampires and emo and things related on a Gerard Way article doesn't necessarily make it funny or good. Which this article isn't. -Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 17:33, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted and redirected. This article was noooooooot OOOOOOOOKaaaaaayyyyy... (So I know a line from an emo song - bite me). --UU - natter10:25, Aug 17
Category:People Oscar Wilde has fucked
Keep
Delete
Delete Wildecruft. I bet Oscar Wilde didn't have sex with half the people in this category. --Mn-z 16:40, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Honestly, I think it's time to trim back a lot of Uncyclopedia's 2005-2006 Wilde-related shit. If we could get Wilde down to, say, 30 articles... that'd be great. pillow talk 20:44, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Pointless categories suck. --UU - natter10:18, Aug 17
Comments
Crunchberry_famine_of_1652|Crunchberry famine of 1652
Keep
Delete
Delete Too random, I don't find it funny in any way. It hasn't been edited in over a year, and I see no redemption being possible. -Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 03:42, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I'm starting to think that a love of sports and an inability to write coherent sentences are correlated traits. pillow talk 23:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Its probably not beyond redemption, if the original author were to come back and fix it. Unfortunately, that is almost definitely not going to happen. --Mn-z 04:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Except for the title 'Pear of Anguish' - you can pretty much delete the rest down to the links and it would make better sense as a blank page. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 22:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Ugh. I think I lost brain cells just by reading this piece of crap. --—Mazaka(talk) 06:46, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Having actually watched several episodes of Love Hina, I can assure you that this is every bit as bad as it looks. pillow talk 23:12, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Delete. --
Keep. It made me smile. And I like pussies--kittens. Third part could use work. 
Template:Awilde
WHAT THE FUCK?
