Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive184

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

🔒 UnNews:World Prepares for Mass Synchronized Dancing Zombie Takeover H Tag Oldvfd

Keep
Delete
Comments

🔒 David Icke H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Keep
  • Symbol keep vote Keep. I actually went to the press conference when he 'came out' on the lizards running the world business 20 years ago....There is a lot of work/rant work in there with some regular vandalism thrown in. I don't mind trying to fix it but won't stand in anyone's way if they want to flush it away...--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:15, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • OEJ. ~Jewriken.GIF 18:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep without even looking at it, since Romartus says he's going to fix it. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 19:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote Keep. Though it needs some major cleanup. —Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Loving it like jizz. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:06, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Not as funny as the real story of Icke - a man who believes that the royal family can at will turn themselves into lizards, but not bad enough to delete. mAttlobster. (hello) 06:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  • No problem Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 09:28 June 26 '09
Delete
  • Disintegrate. Mmmkay, this is essentially an unfunny rant by someone who hates this guy. Not funny, and poorly done.

Saberwolf116 16:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Ok..Mr Icke..come quietly...I have some lizards who want to meet you..--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:14, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

  • keept -RAHB 14:32, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

🔒 UnScripts:The Young and the Uncyclopedians H D Oldvfd

Keep
  • Yawn So who was saying they were against mass deletions? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 09:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep except sort of not really. I am against this kind of mass genocide - kill all of TYATU? Quite apart from that being quite a large undertaking, that would require more than just the kind of simple 5 : 0 vote that gets rid of a single article. I wouldn't object to TYATU being deleted per se, but not in this fashion. However, listing all the episodes would take forever, so perhaps a forum for proper discussion? Although someone would then say "this is a case for VFD, not the dump, I suppose. Ho hum. Anyway, yeah, not like this. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:39, Jun 25
  • What that weird fellow said. ~Jewriken.GIF 09:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote Meh. Keep it, but protect all the pages and forbid adding anything more or something. Just nominate the real crappy ones. —Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:45, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Simply cause I'm not mentioned. Also, it reminds me of this old buddy of mine... The Gown Cycle creator! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Sigh. If we can't do it with the timeline... I do agree that these are pretty much shit, but I guess mass deletions are taboo. -What UU said.
  • Symbol keep vote Strategic Keep it keeps "certain folk" from fouling up mainspace articles. And its hidden away in its own little corner, so its not really hurting anything. --Mn-z 15:11, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • If it's just for the one page, keep (some of the kids seem to like it). If it's for all the pages, Invalid nomination (VFD does not work like that. Too much opportunity for evil, and not the good kind of evil, either). Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote Keep. You b*stards should be very proud to have this, as at one time it was the beginning of major and serious UnScripts. TKF, do you realize that you still have a character in this show? --High Gen. Meganew (Stuff I've Done) (Chat With Me) (Get an Award!) FORCES ENLIST MUN 19:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete
  • Delete. So when it comes to VFD there are typically 3 things that could potentially save an article despite it being shit: its significance as an in-joke, its significance as a blue link, and the overall effort put into it. Back in the day, when this was nommed last, I voted to keep based on the first and third reasons. However, nowadays, TYATU has stretched itself far, far too thin, and no longer carries any significance whatsoever. At best, it is just a vanity pet project of its two creators, whose self-inserts have dominated 80 percent of the action; at least back in the past, while it was still vanity, it at least pandered to other members of the site! It isn't even an in-joke anymore; the only in-joke that's arisen from it is its shocking ability to not be deleted, and what the hell kind of a horrible meta in-joke is that? As a blue link, sure, it means we'd have a lot of cleaning up to do when it comes to deleting the articles, but we've gotta do what we've gotta do. And, sure, it may look like Meganew and Uncyclopedian put in a lot of effort into this, but that still doesn't make it good. Each episode is a tired rehash of the last one, with an evident lack of humor or original content. They may be typing a lot, but it doesn't mean they're putting effort into it. Words words words, delete TYATU. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 06:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • I don't care that it's vanity. I do, however, care that it's shit. Symbol delete vote Delete.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 06:59 Jun 25, 2009
  • Whatever. --Bald dude Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D Bald dude 07:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A double first. Up for VFH and VFD at the same time. It really should be posted onto Meganew's page and left there. If were not prepared to let another writer put up his fantasy sequel to Power Rangers with him as the main mover (!) in a recent VFD then there isn't a good reason for this to exist in the main uncyclopedian space. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • This, of course, means that we'll be deleting each subsequent episode of TYATU, and not just the first. This includes all spinoffs (including my own). --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 06:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
    And by that you mean "We'll be putting each episode here, for voting and, if successful, deletion", right? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
    You're not gonna bring all of that here. I fucking mean it. There's like... 500 of them. I'm barely even exaggerating, either. You'll have to make a FFW or V-Week. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
    I believe your title is "Poopsmith" rather than "VFD landlord"? ~Jewriken.GIF 09:55, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
    No. I'm Mr. Furley and you kids are late with the rent! But seriously, that shit does need to be dealt with but I don't think a mass deletion vote here is good enough, as there is no way anyone will want to/could possibly read all of them to make a fair decision. Hmm... I'm going with what you said against the mass deletion of the timeline which is made up of less than 20 articles, not 300. This is just too large for VFD to handle. *psst* Huff it all as vanity and ignore complaints! It'd totally work that way. Zombiebaron would totally do it that way. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 10:12, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
I see the VFH has gone. But it looks like the TYATU crowd are in fact a sub species outfit here only interested in talking to themselves and placing each other in the feature. In other words - disguised vanity which I thought was an auto delete offense. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

So it's okay to nominate hundreds of articles for deletion at once, but it's not okay to nominate the timeline at once? Saberwolf116 16:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

No, its more like we don't have a way to deal with a 500 article long series of bad articles. --Mn-z 16:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
There should be a way of dealing with this as it is like horrible bindweed. It will probably double in size in the next twelve months and the people writing it will just carry on..Call the Law of TYATU in their dubious honour and have just one saved as a sad example for what writers shouldn't do.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
This does operate as an idiot-magnet, and its out of the way. It really isn't hurting anything, and I don't think it will generate similar articles in mainspace. I also don't like deleting stuff that somebody cares about. --Mn-z 17:15, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Ok..well I won't push it..As long as they stay in their room and keep away from the adults...--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Guys, just leave me and Uncyclopedian be. To everyone here: this is the only UnScript to turn into both a series and an in-joke. Plus, deleting this will also delete everything else related to it, including most everyone's userpages, High Gen. Grue's archived pages, and the TYATU NY series(recently updated by Gert5). --High Gen. Meganew (Stuff I've Done) (Chat With Me) (Get an Award!) FORCES ENLIST MUN 19:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

...everyone's userpages? --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 01:39, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Necrotesticvs

Keep
Delete
Lol i get et Sunbeam no u Have you been doing your ironing? 02:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments

UMFUKoPAaD

Keep
Delete
Comments

*I actually laughed at this, just because it was that random. I'm legally obliged to Symbol neutral vote Abstain.. ImNotASunbeam 01:07, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Fort-Coulonge, Quebec

Keep
Delete
Comments

UnNews:A guide to melbourne education

Keep
Delete
Comments

The Phantom of the Opera/Opera Draft

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Abandoned sub-page draft article thingy that should possibly have been in userspace except the author isn't active any more. It's not linked from anywhere (the page it's a sub-page of is a redirect) and as far as I can see, it's pointless. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:43, Jun 24

Symbol delete vote Delete. One of those articles where you would have to write in the style of the original author. I don't think that is possible here. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 12:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments

The Sayers Dance

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. It's been here ages, with pretty well no edits, no decent ideas, nothing linking to it and no love. It starts out dull, thne gets random. I don't see it getting better. Get rid. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:19, Jun 24
  • Disintegrate. Schedueled for release in 2006? This thing has really, really been neglected. Saberwolf116 14:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Nuke it.—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 17:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. --Mn-z 15:48, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol EXTERMINATE vote small Let's get rid of it.  —Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Symbol neutral vote Abstain. Not having a clue what this was all about - I stuck it in google. This Comes out third on the search list..so anyone looking to know about Sayers is going to find this site ! Should it be kept therefore..bottled even ??...--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

UnNews:A Steady Decline

Keep
Delete
Comments

UnNews:A man Gives birth to a child

Keep
Delete
Comments

UnNews:CIA sends photo of The Cursed Wiki Article to Kim Jong-Il to attempt his assassination

Keep
Delete
Comments

🔒 Oakwood H Tag Oldvfd

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Invalid nom. WiP tagged towncruft, in the main, and not just vanity. Remove the vanity - which I've done - and list anyone who replaces it on Ban Patrol. If they remove the WiP tag, bring it back here. Otherwise leave it until they get bored and the WiP tag does its job. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:32, Jun 24
    It was created by the person as vanity. I say that due to the fact the version by the original creator contained vanity (See? Who the hell are Barry scott and Geoffery Wansell?). The WiP was just added in the past 24 hours by the guy who "vandalised" it, though I bet it was the original author who wrote it has an IP. Regardless, the WiP is an invalid tag and this unfunny piece of shit falls into VFD's territory. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:42, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
    Barry Scott is best thought of as a UK Billy Mays. Geoffrey Wansell is here. There was one vanity section, as with many towncruft articles. The vanity-adder has been banned, and will get banned again if he adds it again. If he doesn't, it's likely it'll get deleted in a week as no-one else is going to edit this article so the WiP tag will do the job. If the WiP tag gets removed, bring it back here. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:48, Jun 24
    Fine... MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:49, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

🔒 Blindness H D Oldvfd

Keep

Ankh smite Nah. It's kind of messy, out there, and short, but it has enough good jokes to make it worth keeping. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project Kirbywave2 13:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete
Comments

I thought of rewriting it in braille with black pics but braille already exists XD...

  • Symbol neutral vote Abstain. crap but notable. --Mn-z 15:35, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Notable; blindness is notable? You believe that not being able to see is suitably important so as an unfunny article on it should be saved? I don't think there's many people who use Uncyclopedia as a research tool. Is blindness more notable than deafness? What about if you've got a blocked nose and are unable to smell? What about people with one eye that slightly looks a different way from the other? mAttlobster. (hello) 21:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
You're thinking of a lazy eye, which are certainly notable. Definitely. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • It's quite bad alright, but is it bad enough for VFD? —Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:36, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Its so bad that the "Image" implanted in my brain by this article prevents me from being able to even attempt a rewrite because i might go blind from aweful memories!Put all 911 tags on it if it is not gonna be deleted but please it hurts my soul!

🔒 Consumer reports H D Oldvfd

Keep
Delete
Comments

Scrubs

Keep
Delete
Comments

Beginning of Time

Keep
Delete
  • Disintegrate. Since we can't get rid of the entire timeline at once, let's take a look at it like this. I've read through this, and it's an irredeemble piece of shit. Saberwolf116 15:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Horrifyingly bad for more reasons than I could care to list. Just look at it yourself.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 15:07 Jun 23, 2009
  • We'll take them down, one by one Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 15:22 June 23 '09
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. not needed for the timeline, and I don't see how it can be made funny. --Mn-z 15:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. The entire timeline is shit and something I've hated for a long time. If we have to get rid of it one section at a time then so be it. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN16:27, 23 Jun
  • Kerkill MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:15, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Also, we might want to consider protecting it from creation in case of IPs. Saberwolf116 17:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

🔒 Ori H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Keep
  • Weak Keep I can some good bits in this article. If it gets deleted, it will probably come back worse. I think this is probably a better base for a rewrite than a blank slate. Plus, we don't want to have {{Ori}} to have a red link in its title. --Mn-z 06:42, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. It has some redeemable stuff. {{Rewrite}}, not delete. —Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:16, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. I trimmed out the lists and quotes - stick a rewrite tag on what's left and see what happens. --UU - natter UU Manhole 12:05, Jun 18
  • Symbol keep vote The Weakest Keep Of All Rewrite this, and it should be fine. ~SponsorshipSucks !!! (18:30 06-18-2009)

Symbol keep vote Keep.. It's kind of funny, and it's probably funnier for people who watch Stargate. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project Kirbywave2 13:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete
Comments

Symbol neutral vote Abstain. Needs a rewrite , hoover, dustpan and brush...what ever to stay. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


Too close. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The entirety of Uncyclopedia:Timeline except 1927 and After the End of Time

Keep
  • No. First of all, I'm against the whole thing of categorically removing such a big portion. Also, I'm against deleting this rather than rewriting this. This one is a project for one of our usergroups who keep claiming that they're better than one another, not for deletion. ~Jewriken.GIF 08:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. Two words: Fails HTBFANJS. It's almost entirely listy bullshit. I know it's supposed to be listy, but that's no excuse for it being bullshit. No one wants to read this shit, much less laugh at it.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 05:26 Jun 23, 2009
    With the notable exception of: 1927, which is an actual article with actual comedic pacing. Nothing else here has comedic pacing. Maybe comedic walking-home-drunk-from-the-pub, but not pacing.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 05:30 Jun 23, 2009
  • Kerkill It all sucks except for 1927 which would be kept. If someone where to rewrite, they wouldn't use anything there. It's vanity filled and meme-crufty as hell. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • STRONGEST POSSIBLE DISINTEGRATE! Ever sinced I first came onto Uncyclopedia, I have hated the timeline with a passion. With the exception of 1927, it is random, unfunny, cliche filled cruft that nobody laughs at. Perhaps it's better to let the timeline speak for itself: "A youngman wearing a pair of pants with a bumpy square pattern dances so much he heats his pants to 350 degrees and falls on pancake batter creating the waffle iron." Saberwolf116 06:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete I would do anything for love...but I wont do that...NO NO NO I wont do that. mAttlobster. (hello) 06:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Except 1927, The Land Before Time and After the End of Time. The last 2 are decent enough for a rewrite, everything else is terrible. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 07:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
    The Land Before Time isn't on the timeline. After the End of Time has been added to the bit that isn't going to be decided through this vote. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 07:37, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete It's chock-full of the very worst in 'random' faux-humour and terrible memes. "Rip it up and start again" as Orange Juice once sang. --Zarbag 10:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • I do believe this is an invalid nomination. Category-wide noms have been declared invalid in the past. --Mn-z 05:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
    When, may I ask, was this? I don't recall that (I probably was doing one of my disappearing acts at that time). MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
    Seeing as you continually vote for articles for invalid reasons (not following guidelines) I suggest you keep quiet Mnbvcxz. mAttlobster. (hello) 06:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
    Or maybe sing some kind of sad song. mAttlobster. (hello)
    Now now, calm down Matt. Other than voting out of spite or because someone is paying you to vote a certain way, all reasons are valid. Also, don't edit conflict me damn you! GRR! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 06:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Vote for an article based on whether it is funny. There need be no more criteria. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:04, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Omg, invalid, lol. "Hey, let's have this one vote on, like, twenty articles!". You're looking for VFMD (Vote for Mass Deletion) which, God willing, does not exist. Peace! Modus, out! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

🔒 Pope Sevunus H Tag Oldvfd

Keep
Delete
Comments

Close enough. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

12345

Keep
Delete
Comments

Symbol neutral vote Abstain. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 11:39, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

🔒 Spork (animal) H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Keep
Delete
  • Delete and move to illogicopedia. Random 2005cruft. --Mn-z 04:56, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete reminds me of myself when I'm trying too hard to be funny and absolutely failing. ImNotASunbeam 07:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Symbol delete vote Smoked Spam. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project Kirbywave2 14:50, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments
  • 7 : 6 in favour after a week. Keeptificated. --UU - natter UU Manhole 08:32, Jun 23

Christiamabafanity

Keep
Delete
Comments

🔒 Biggie H D Oldvfd

Keep
  • Hmm. So, the page used to be better than it is? Well, we'd better delete its entire history, then. Let's get right on that. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 23:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep per Hyperbole. I suggest reverting to a better version. You know you can do that right? You're also can rewrite bad existing articles, instead of deleting them and making them anew from scratch. Anway, I think the current version is probably better than a blank slate. --Mn-z 06:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Biggie Biggie Biggie/Can't you see/Sometimes your words just hypnotize me/ MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Bad article, yes. You just ruined the nomination by saying it's gotten worse, hell yes. ~SponsorshipSucks !!! (16:18 06-19-2009)
  • Symbol keep vote Keep. No biggie. The la Zhel 06:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep It seems like it was whored by IPs over a long period of time; i've reverted it to a better version. Saberwolf116 13:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. --Bald dude Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D Bald dude 00:59, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Keept -RAHB 01:40, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Horrid

Keep
Delete
Comments

Russel brand

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. The page is a duplicate, and the title is misspelled.
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. Agreed. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 20:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Came home from the pub; PVRed Ponderland which is basically Brand doing his funny thing; slapped on the laptop, hit VFD, and there was he. Bit weird. That said, article read...no chance. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. per above. --Mn-z 04:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Has a merge tag on it but there's nothing worth merging that I can see. Also, wish I could cut out the middle man and just delete Brand himself, little twat that he is. --UU - natter UU Manhole 08:35, Jun 20
Comments

Diminish Day

Keep
Delete
Comments

🔒 Template:Cowbell H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Keep
Delete
  • LOL COWBELL PLOX it's time we gave this the boot.   Le Cejak <8:45 Jun 16, 2009>
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. If anyone can give me one good example of this template being used in a funny way, I will change my vote. -- Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project Kirbywave2 14:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
OK....Template:Cowbell walks into a pub.....ouch.....no actually that should be....Template:Cowbell walk into a bar....ouch!....Template:Cowbell you are such a disappointment. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:33, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
  • delete. only linked from about 20 mainspace pages, which surprised me. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:12, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. its only "valid" use is to uglify userpages. Perverse instruction template. --Mn-z 15:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Disintegrate. And now i'll get rid of all the links. Saberwolf116 16:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
  • D1337 Colin Explode fireALL YOUR BASEExplode fireHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 16:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Surely you missed out a '3' there? ImNotASunbeam 16:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments

It's no better and it's no worse than some of the other templates here. However I can see this has stirred great passion in the thumping thing a few uncyclopedians have glued inside their chests. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

I can't be the only one who thinks that...
Cowbell2 This article needs more cowbell.

You can help by adding more cowbell.

Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

He never ever gets tired. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

The score is tied, 8-8, who will win?

me! Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 19:30 June 18 '09

Keep'd. Close enough. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Web 4.0

Keep
Delete
  • Disintegrate. Why was this kept last time? This isn't any good. Saberwolf116 00:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. it appears that the author added a {{WIP}} tag to the article while it was on VFD. It appears that author did some work after the keep, but not enough to make it a good article. In other words, it was kept because the author was still working on it. --Mn-z 04:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. Fidel Castro marries Yoko Ono...so life goes on. However this should be removed.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - Let me tell you where I am with this...I'm OOOOOOOOOOOOT! mAttlobster. (hello) 19:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. - Question mark? My UncyclopedianAnniversary "Celebration" (16:16 06-19-2009)
  • Kerkill And it was kept last time per the fact the author had still been working on it. But it looks like he didn't really finish. Oh well. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:19, 19 June 2009
  • Deletify. Hmm...That'll be a no. Nameable mumble? 18:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

(UTC)

Comments

Dingwall

Keep
  • keep What is the ruling about really local jokes ? It avoids vanity and could probably be

all true as well. Also as regards images and formatting - it is at least moderately competent .--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete
  • Utter irredeemable shite ~Jewriken.GIF 09:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
  • قطعة براز Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 10:03 June 18 '09
  • Delete. --Docile hippopotamus 10:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Silly local jokes of no interest to those outside. NOT moderately competent. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. population of village is 5,026: not notable, village-cruft --Mn-z 16:15, 18 June 2009 (UTC)--Mn-z 16:15, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote DEEEEELLLEEEEETTTEEEEE can still be heard to this day. ~SponsorshipSucks !!! (18:26 06-18-2009)
Comments

Template:Ori

Keep
Delete
Comments

Extreme Kitten Huffing: Search for a Cure

Keep
Delete
Comments

Template:Megaman

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Typical "approves" template. Made even worse by that fact that we don't have a page on Megaman. --Mn-z 05:15, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
  • D1337 As per not having a Megaman article. Colin Explode fireALL YOUR BASEExplode fireHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 05:22, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Smite lightning Smite. Megaman has a hydraulic penis Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 09:21 June 17 '09
  • Delete Not having a page on Megaman can only be seen as a good thing. It's a computer game thing isn't it? People who find computer games funny normally wear stained trousers and believe the earth is 6000 years old. What am I going on about? No idea.... ehhh.. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:17, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 13:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Zen Rfanklib

Keep
Delete
  • Delete It's absolute crap. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN20:36, 16 Jun
  • Delete Some how the Big Bang has eventually lead to the creation of this article. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Kerkill Though I was really thinking of voting keep out of spite. Then I decided to go with reason. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 22:28, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. it appears the author (of the same name) has recently edited article. But looking deeper, I found that the author is banned until judgment day. Hence, he won't be back to fix it. --Mn-z 04:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Symbol delete vote Delete. Poorly explained joke that relies on local knowledge to think it is funny. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:39, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Template:Spam

Keep
Delete

Symbol delete vote Delete. Finger painting ? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:41, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Fake

Keep
Delete
Comments
Personal tools
projects