Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive135

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

AFI

Keep
Delete
Comments

Chicken of the Sea

Keep
Delete
Comments

Tell city

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. WP spork with no funny added. Hasn't been touched since creation in April. Get rid. Hang on, all that sounds kind of familiar... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:29, Jun 11
  • Delete. Not funny at all, just a bunch of made up facts. Sorry.--Faizaguo 17:44, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. I'm telling you it's obviously sporked. This is not what we want. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 17:55, Jun 11
  • God. --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 19:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Kerkill Crap. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 19:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Borders on vanity as far as I can tell (ever met anyone from there? planed a vacation there? Would you give a damn if it vanished?) and seems sporked (though why anyone would go to the trouble is beyond me).--Sgt. Fluffy 00:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Comments

William Tell

Keep
Delete
Comments

Atomic fisting

Keep
Delete
Comments

Yotor

Keep
Delete
Comments

🔒 Amy Acker H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Keep
  • Keep Again the nomination comment of just HTBFANJS is not helping me understand why this should be deleted. Agreed it's not awesomely funny, but it's far from pants fan cruft, and if we start deleting things like this we might be left with not a lot else. Lets get rid of the really bad stuff first. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 20:54, Jun 9
  • Keep Sorry Dexter111344, I have to agree with MrN9000. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 17:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. She's that broad from that show that I haven't seen. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. I spy an article crying out for a rewrite tag. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:05, Jun 11
Delete
Comments

Ti-84

Keep
Delete
Comments

Kelloggs

Keep
Delete
  • Short and not funny most of the page is taken up by crap, the products section takes up most of it. Theres only about 1 full paragraph, and it sucks. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 02:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Shit, just like the Organic Puffed Oats Delete as per the Dudeman --Kurgan's Back. Prepare to get pwned. (Unless you are Chuck Norris)Confederate Navy Jack 02:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Kerkill Only thing I found to be the least bit funny was the Oscar Wilde quote. And that was barely a snicker. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 02:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Made me gag and its not just the idea of sugar coated spam.--Sgt. Fluffy 02:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. I tried to find something redeeming in this. I failed. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:09, Jun 11
  • Maybe not. It's the sort of article that makes you feel not wanting to carry on because it is filled with such random and not funny made-up facts. This sounds harsh I know but this is how it was like to me.--Faizaguo 17:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Philip Zimbardo

Keep
Delete
Comments

🔒 UnNews:NONSENSE WATERMELON CATASTROPHE H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Keep
  • Fucking keep Read this last night. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 23:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep.   Le Cejak <0:42, 10 Jun 2008>
  • Symbol keep vote Pizza. Also, sounds like TKF needs a wikibreak. Trust me dude, they're mad helpful...  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:43 Jun 10, 2008
  • Keep Giant random piece of shit, you say? Sorry, bud, but since when is it bad to let ourselves lighten up a bit?~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 00:45, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
    • When we look at the same thing when it's written by an IP and delete it in a milisecond --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
      • IPs normally don't format so well. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 13:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
        • So I suppose it's only worth keeping because of the format now? Or are you saying that the only difference between this and an equally unfunny random mess made by an IP is the... formatting? Or both? --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • More like yes. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Zombiebaron. (hur hur hur) --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 01:33, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak keep It's utterly incoherent but in a good way. --Sgt. Fluffy 04:08, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep I agree with Kip that it's more fit for Illogicopedia, but, y'know, I don't care. Someone can write a well-researched and thoroughly sourced article on Illogicopedia to make up for it. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 13:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - Just for the record (this has already been kept, as per the rules of VFD): I wrote this article not to "rub it" in anyone's "face". I wrote this because I wanted to write an article, and this article made me laugh. Please return to VFD when you have nothing to prove and an article that is over a week old, please. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:21, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • But Seriously...keep Just doesn't deserve deletion IMO (I've never used that acronym before and never plan to ever use it again). -RAHB 08:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Bizarre, but made me laugh, and seems in an odd way to have more structure and intent than most random articles. Plus the "keeps" clearly outnumber the "deletes" so can we please get this mammoth table off the VFD page now? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 08:38, Jun 11
Delete
  • omg so funnie & RANDOM!! XD XD All formalities aside, this is a giant random piece of shit. I don't give a flying fuck that Zombiebaron wrote it, or if he did it to "be ironic." If you're being randomly ironic, you're being random; if you're parodying a piece of shit, you're still writing a piece of shit. This is inexcusable. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 23:57, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • OMG Zombiebaron wrote this! IT MEUST BE GOOOOD LOL. --¿Qua? es mi página de discusión, es lo que mi contribuiría 00:00, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • meh I don't find it funny at all Fou-Lu Vote for Cunt of the Munth! 00:49, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Sorry ZB, I feel like I'm missing something here... - Don Leddy the Crunch Fedora (Nyah, see, nyah!) 01:13, Jun 10
  • Move to ?pedia - Insanely random articles are usually more funny to me when a noob or IP does it. (I know ZB is only doing this to show he can get away with it.) Aside from that, this still didn't hit my funny bone. It if were at Illogicopedia, I'd atleast go "heh". -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 02:39, Jun. 10, 2008
  • Huff Really ZB, did you have to rub it in our faces that much. --Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 04:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Agreed with Kip --~FAG! +chatline "if it ain't broke, break it" (CUN·VFH) 09:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Zombiebaron. (hur hur hur) --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 17:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep I just want to be able to say I voted for featuring and for deleting the same article. -RAHB 03:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Comments
  • UN:DP - "Exceptions: Articles which are less then a week old. In these cases, please consider using approprite maintenance templates such as {{ICU}}. Other exceptions include articles under construction or being peer reviewed." Um? MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 00:10, Jun 10
  • Comment: Move it to ?pedia, methinks. It fits perfectly there. - Don Leddy the Crunch Fedora (Nyah, see, nyah!) 00:44, Jun 10
  • cough  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:50 Jun 10, 2008
    • There is something entirely different between nonsense, in-joke and random. Nonsense/novelty takes a concept and runs with it through the entire article. In-joke is self-explanatory. This is neither, it is just random, and it isn't good. It isn't even non-sequitor. It's just bad. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
      • I disagree on it being random. It's reminiscent of formal thought disorder (a mix of circumstantiality and derailment for the most part). It has meaning to the author and intent of expressing something, the reader just doesn't know what. --Sgt. Fluffy 18:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
        • Your smart person words make a convincing argument. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 19:00, Jun. 10, 2008
          • So you're saying it isn't just a random mesh of verbs and nouns strung together into phrases and sentences, but in fact a cipher for some splendorous concept that transcends normal human thought? I'm sorry, I thought Uncyclopedia was a place for humor and satire, not the freakin' Voynich Manuscript. By your argument, this would just become another "AAAAAAAA! clone," even though it isn't nearly similar to those either. What is this? It is absolutely nothing, and has no place on this wiki. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:34, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
            • It's rather humorous if one understands what a formal thought disorder is (schizophrenia for a weak example). It's not so much a cipher as the inability to express ones self. This is closer to what should be "bat fuck insane" then our current article when taken in the context of the real world. I am willing to make concessions in that it is, perhaps, only funny if one has studied psychopathology. If someone would be so kind as to archive it under my userspace (with the picture) I would be willing to change my vote to "weak keep" --Sgt. Fluffy 21:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
              • Archived under your userspace. Please consider changing your vote, if we suddenly decided to create all of our articles in a different psychopathic medium, we'd be worse than ED. We've already got more than our fair share of "bat fuck insane" (read: random) articles, we don't need another one. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Abstaining It has been brought to my attention that there are perhaps better places for this article and that it may be seen as nothing short of gibberish by some readers. While I personally find it funny it is hard for me to tell if enough people will to warrant it being kept. --Sgt. Fluffy 23:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
    • Go with what you want. Screw other people. And there would be enough support if you would go back to a keep. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 00:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
      • Part of what makes a good article is it's ability to be enjoyed by the majority of people who read it. I did however only promise to change to a weak keep so I suppose I can do that in good conscience. --Sgt. Fluffy 00:56, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Kept -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Let's not wikilawyer on a site that only has two rules. So it's under 7 days old. I don't think you're going to improve the article further, so a VFD now is the same as one later. This just saves time. Who knows, maybe it'll help you appreciate VFD and maintenance tagging from the other side? Spang talk 03:01, 11 Jun 2008
  • I am willing to improve the article based on whatever constructive criticisms it receives. "It is random" is neither constructive nor criticism. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:12, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Well, I think it's technically criticism... Whether or not it's constructive is definitely open to interpretation, though. - Don Leddy the Crunch Fedora (Nyah, see, nyah!) 03:20, Jun 11
  • Who says it's criticism? Robot Chicken depends on randomness for much of the show. I'm sure most of us(who have heard of it, at least) will agree it is a good show, but tends to be random. And if you say that's at all constructive, then, in my opinion good sir, you are wrong. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 03:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Whether it is criticism is really up to personal interpretation. Constructive criticism, however, in this case would be advice on how to make the article "better" (in the eyes of the adviser); simply saying "Make it not random" is both impractical and imprecise. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:34, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Other
  • Symbol delete vote Ban the Internet, thus forcing people to find their senses of humor again.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 03:37 Jun 11, 2008
  • What the hell is other?! Madness! Spang talk 03:42, 11 Jun 2008
  • AAAAAAGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!! Plus, this one vote is now half of the page... Or at least a third of the page... --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 03:44, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Bollocks Based on previous VFD votes this now has more than enough keep votes to save it. I don't care either way about this being deleted or not, but I don't think it should be on the front page news list. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 10:58, Jun 11

Yep, let's end this. Kept. Voting closed. ~Jewriken.GIF 11:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

UnNews:EMERGENCY LIPS

Keep
  • Keep A) To spite Cajek (nobody fucks with my head but me!) B) Because I actually find it funny (albeit in need of modification and a namespace change to be taken seriously). -RAHB 03:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP I'm crazy in the head. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 04:16, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Alright, now I'm confused. - Don Leddy the Crunch Fedora (Nyah, see, nyah!) 03:29, Jun 11
  • Ban Cajek just wrote this, and is now noming it for deletion to fuck with our heads. Don't hesitate, nail the sucker! Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 03:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Ban Dr. Skullthumper for the sake of irony.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 03:32 Jun 11, 2008
  • Errr... created the same day and nominated by the creator? shouldn't this be in QVFD? --Sgt. Fluffy 03:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • It definitely shouldn't be an UnNews, as I see no place from which it is being reported from. Plus, it is too new to be on VFD. Not only that but the original author is nominating it therefore it should really be QVFD'd(but I like it). Plus, this is clearly meant to waste space on VFD to prove some inane point... Ban Cajek!!! --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 03:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Marlborough

Keep
Delete
Comments

Kazushi Sakuraba

Keep
Delete
Comments

Darkwing Duck

Keep
Delete
Comments

🔒 Woody Harrelson H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Keep
Delete
Comments

Dr. Phil

Keep
Delete
Comments

Space Elves

Keep
Delete
Comments

The Belkans

Keep
Delete
Comments


🔒 Harry Hill H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Keep
  • Keep For heaven's sake give it a chance! We need a Harry Hill page; why not a rewrite template instead? --Zarbag 18:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Yea, I'm with Zarbag on this. There is some stuff in there which is worth saving, and just stating HTBFANJS does not really explain the reasons Sabrown100 wants this deleted. Can we have more than just HTBFANJS as a deletion reason Sabrown100? If everyone just said that, it would not really help much. Cheers. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 20:47, Jun 9
  • Keep Since he is apparently a well-known British thing-a-ma-bobber, and plus the bit of workable material, I say medium rewrite. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 23:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, dammit. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Rewrite tag. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 08:09, Jun 10
  • Keep OK so I'm the author, so I'm gonna say that, but let me explain a little first. Since I last edited this page (a few months ago), it has seemingly been MULLERED by various people (I assume because some of the subject matter was, shall we say, incredibly politically incorrect), and now parts of it are dangerously close to being completely unfunny. Not my fault, honest :S Cp833 13:33, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  • What the hell was I thinking? --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 17:55, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Kept, reverted to PLS version --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 17:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

The apprentice

Keep
Delete
Comments

Principle of Gorniel

Keep
Delete
Comments

Why?:Not

Keep
Delete
Comments

BFG

Keep
Delete
Comments

🔒 American eagle H Tag Oldvfd

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Um, this was created today SysRq? MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 23:11, Jun 9

Yes, please let's not VFD articles that were created two minutes ago? ~Jewriken.GIF 07:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

KOOK

Keep
Delete
Comments

Prerecorded Friends

Keep
Delete
Comments

Penriff

Keep
Delete
Comments

Pageant fan

Keep
Delete
Comments

Noobland

Keep
Delete
Comments

Amanda Wenk

Keep
Delete
Comments

Mother Theresa

Keep
Delete
Comments

Spiklespock

Keep
Delete
Comments

University of Ottawa

Keep
Delete
Comments

Apparently, it was rewritten by an IP. Take another look. ~Jewriken.GIF 08:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Yea, mine also. It's better, but I would still have probably nominated it. If the IP gets an accounts and wants to work on this in userspace, good on him/her/it. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 15:44, Jun 9

10000

Keep
Delete
Comments

Anxiety

Keep
Delete
Comments

Offended

Keep
  • Keep to save from QVFDHas Potential Fou-Lu 02:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

It is a stub that was blanked by original author. It's too new for VFD. According to UN:DEL, it is eligible for QVFD. And don't remove things from QVFD, Fou-Lu. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 02:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Trondheim East side

Keep
Delete
Comments

2015

Keep
Delete
Comments


ROT26

Keep
Delete
Comments

Publicly Ridiculed Person of the Random Indeterminate Time Period ‎

Keep
Delete
Comments

Deception Bay

Keep
Delete
Comments

Line of code

Keep
Delete
Comments

Chania

Keep
Delete
Comments

Video blog

Keep
Delete
Comments

Gnu math

Keep
Delete
Comments

Professor Snape

Keep
Delete
Comments
Personal tools
projects