This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
abstain I don't know about this one. It seems that I kinda like it but I don't know what Roman Dog Bird is going for here? ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 02:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
I think there's a difference between "going for something" and "not getting the joke". Disclaimer: On the offhand chance that Roman Dog Bird is gay and thus found the article offensive, I apologize if this remark comes off as insensitive. CUNRATalk to me_ 05:51, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
No, I'm not gay, and I'm not offended by it. If you were to look at my user page, you will find a link to this article, a stupid and homophobic stub that I voted to keep when it was nominated for deletion awhile ago. Sony GayStation, despite the effort that the writer put into it however, doesn't make me laugh at all. I just think it's incredibly lame, and according to you, I don't "get it". --Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
UnNews:Elizabeth MCVXII visits West-onia
Keep
Delete
Deletenot funny and is to old to be rewritten --SirManforman 22:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Comment This is the second article by Gert5 on VFD. I just glanced at his "list of articles I've written" thing. They're all crap. Can we just get this over with and delete them all in one fell swoop? Have a "Delete all of Gert5's articles" Day? It's going to take way too long to go through them one at a time. And you know that they are all going to end up here at some point. --CUNRATalk to me_ 06:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Great idea--SirManforman 17:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
I was right All of Gert5's articles are ending up here! It's time to storm his articles! Nom them all for deletion at once! Who's with me?! --CUNRATalk to me_ 06:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm with you Radioactive afikomen, anybody else?--SirManforman 17:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Just remember, Manforman, if it is older than a week old, you definitely can't put it up for VFD and probably can't put it up for ICU. Therefore, move it to VFD. --SPYAdministrator(Complain|I rock|In memoriam)HMRFRAWH 21:20, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Yah, I know Admin. This was so crappy, I decided to put it on QVFD--SirManforman 21:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete -- I put it in the lounge for a reason. If it had any redeeming value that I could have saved from the mounds of IP vanity/vandalism/cruft that found, I would've fixed it up a bit and tagged it rewrite. But, the page had just been vandalized over and over again, I think it's best to just start anew. Or, if any New-Yorkers want to come along and do a rewrite... *looks at Ljlego* - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 02:27, Nov 2
*Giggles to himself* You know, LedBalloon, when I initially saw your name abbreviated as "TLB", I thought it stood for "The Lesbian Bastard". --CUNRATalk to me_ 06:27, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Abstain It's about sports. The thing I hate the most. So I glanced at it. I decided it wasn't worth reading. It was just too long. I don't vote on what I don't read. --Ernest Hemingway 06:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Somewhat improved since ICU was added, but very marginally. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Throw in the acid pit I don't have the patience to read articles on subjects that don't interest me. Fortunately, this is one of those articles you only need to glance at to know it's bad. --CUNRATalk to me_ 06:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Deflort (I haven't been able to come up with any new good "delete" synonyms lately) --R. Daneel Olivaw (Gaia - Foundation) 01:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Excise There's one for you, R. Daneel. CUNRATalk to me_ 05:57, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete - It could have been funny in a stupid kind of way, but instead it is just weird and random. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c
Comments
Comment The title is the funniest part. It fools you into thinking the article will be even mildly entertaining. It's not. CUNRATalk to me_ 05:59, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Tidus
Keep
Delete
Delete Stubby crap. --THE 19:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete Just utter, utter, utter shit. I genuinely hope the writer falls over in public. Twice. And stubs his toe. On a hammer. And that his closest friends find out he has a penchant for thai ladyboys. You get the picture. HATE HATE HAT <3 .talk.work.?pedia.
Delete. Epic fail. RabbiTechno 19:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Weak Merge? The article has a lot of incoming links, several of which are from templates, and the only other target that makes sense for most of those links is Child, so perhaps a small amount of this article's content could be merged there. I realize that's not very feasible, though, so we might want to think about simply rewriting or deleting. Pentium5dot1 06:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Osamba bin Laden
Keep
Delete
Delete this is by far one of the worst articles I've read, and more cruft from Gert5--SirManforman 17:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Delemte --Kip > Talk•Works•• 18:45, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Purge The only nice thing I can say about this article is that the narrative is coherent, which is more than can be said for many of the other articles on VFD. Which makes the article an incredibly rare combination of passably coherent but still profoundly unfunny. It isn't actually crap—the whole thing is legible, crap implies that the narrative is splintered and incoherent—but it is something far worse, so bad and so frighteningly rare that it doesn't have a name. --CUNRATalk to me_ 19:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Baleet - This kind of thing should be placed on QVFD, and if it fails that it should have {{User:Administrator/CustICU|~~~~~|sub=QVFD}} put on it. (I love that "it passed QVFD but doesn't deserve to have done so" template I made...) --SPYAdministrator(Complain|I rock|In memoriam)HMRFRAWH 21:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Comment Most bad articles have at least one line that is mildly amusing, a brief hint of funny on an otherwise bad page. This is the first article I've ever read on Uncyclopedia that lacks even that. --CUNRATalk to me_ 19:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Religious Leaders of Pastafarianism
Keep
Delete
Delete Long, droning, wall-of-text-ish, and, most importantly, not funny. Reads a little like the bible, minus the interesting parts. --CUNRATalk to me_ 05:25, 2 November 2007
Delete - It's a pity this is too old for ICU, as it could actually survive that given enough work. And it wouldn't take too much. Crop out a few parts, add some images, and you have a decent article. --SPYAdministrator(Complain|I rock|In memoriam)HMRFRAWH 21:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 22:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Not an article really, just a list of fictional superhero names. No adventures, either, despite the title. ----OEJ 23:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete Although the photoshop pics of Fatman and Blobbin are amazing. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 03:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Burninate. Unfunny. Bad Idea.--Jtaylor1 03:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Everybody dies
Keep
Delete
Delete I don't want it anymore. I'm not putting it on QVFD because I want to see if anybody here wants to adopt it or just thinks it has promise. If nobody does, no harm, just kill it. -- Le Cejak•<-> 20:29, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete I moved a copy to my userspace in case I decide to fiddle with it. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 03:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Quickly degenerates into yet another anti-emo tirade. Pointless, and almost nothing to do with the mighty Motörhead. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 11:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
*Dude. At least tell me why you want to nuke this article. I did write most all of it, ya know. --SPYAdministrator(Complain|I rock|In memoriam)HMRFRAWH 23:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Retracted; see comments
Delete. Feels inconsistent to the point of randomness, no clear concept, it looks a mess, and it isn't funny in this form. If you want to work on it, Administrator, move it to your userspace and good luck to you! --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 10:58, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Not funny and ugly as all Hell. Amusing first quote though. RabbiTechno 18:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Administrator: To my mind, the piece feels incoherent. The primary author(s) probably have some good ideas about terrorist deer, evil geniuses, and censorship, but to me these ideas were not brought across the Great Author-Reader Divide clearly. Playing around with different "writers" struggling for control of an article is an attractive idea, and I used it in Pripyat River -- but even that article, which is tamer and more conventional than Bambi, failed to get wide approval. Bambi is too incoherent and confusing. ----OEJ 00:41, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
OK. I get it now. Thanks. I withdraw my previous vote, which was largely a placeholder. I'll see if I can work on bettering this page later, if I have the time. --SPYAdministrator(Complain|I rock|In memoriam)HMRFRAWH 10:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete Ignore the {{rewrite}} tag I put on there; I did that just out of the kindness of my heart because there wasn't room on VFD at the time. The article is far beyond a mere {{rewrite}}. Like I said about "Hydrogen," the chemistry buffs out there should be able to do much better. Pentium5dot1 05:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Manforman nominates another good, funny article - User:Slavemaster2 28 October 2007
Weak keep. Tough call. It seriously needs tidying up, with a lot of random crap and gay "jokes" in need of a cull. But there are, again, some bits in there possibly worth saving. But then that's what the V-tag was for... Oh, weak keep for now. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep It's not great though. The Matt Lobster 15:45 28 October 2007
Delete vilagence patience refuses to die --SirManforman 15:00, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Weak Delete. 99% jokes about Moore's (admittedly vast) obesity. There are so many other reasons to attack him. However, might as well leave it till its Vigilance Week check on Nov. 3rd. RabbiTechno 08:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Week Keap I'll probally take out the crap and work on it. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 08:11, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep if Kip is true to his word and sorts it out. RabbiTechno 08:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete incoherent stub with red links, nothing to see --SirManforman 14:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Weak delete. Harsh, MFM - it's hardly a stub. There are some ideas here hidden in the rough, but they need a decent writer to take them on and remove all the dull stuff that surrounds them and I'm not sure anyone will want to. If anyone does want to, feel free to strike this vote. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 17:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Quite amusing. Still in need of expansion, but what's there is good enough to keep. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep. I like the concept. It needs a tidy up, particularly at the start, but I think there's worthwhile content here. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 17:43, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep same reason as Under User Evil_One275 | Talk | Contribs00:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Loading... 25%.. 30%... 95%... 99%... 98%... BLUE SCREEN!!! - Keep. -- 14:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete --SirManforman 14:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Yep, as I suspected, high traces of bandcruft and lists, and low traces of humour. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 17:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. A jumbled concept, an unfunny stub, and some poor spelling. OK that last isn't such a crime, but it all mounts up! --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 11:36, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete, "Resistentialism is built on the fundamental truth that all inanimate objects all around us, ARE OUT TO GET US!"...good line, bad page. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 16:00, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep. Seems like someone has a problem with cuddly Ken Livingstone when reading this (note: Mayor of London for those who don't know). But parts aren't bad and it needs a tidy up. Possible rewrite tag? --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:01, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep - Same as above. -- 14:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep - and again. RabbiTechno 08:29, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Unfunny with a bunch of random crap. - User:Slavemaster2 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I had to read the first two lines to figure out he was nothing worth putting up on Uncyc - User:Slavemaster2 28 October 2007
Not vanity - Mathew Shephard was a student murdered in 1998 for being gay. Rather a sad story, but the article's rubbish all the same. RabbiTechno 08:32, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Unfunny, the usual exaggeration in place of actual jokes (6000 years!) and a bad idea to begin with. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 11:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete But move the section of Role in the 2004 Presidential Election to another page. I find it funny. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 17:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 03:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete - As a Christian Republican who is better than other Christian Republicans and you by default, it is still slightly offensive and completely not funny. -- User:Slavemaster2 27 October 2007
Delete Has about as much worth as the bible.The Oblong Lobster 13:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Grand Theft Auto: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory
Keep
Weak Keep I thought the best part was at the bottom. I felt the Barney picture was relevant as it portrayed a cheat code. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 17:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I found it funny, and the Barney picture was just too much -- User:Slavemaster2 25 October 2007
Keep - I think this article could do with a mock storyline, a reception portion, and a controversy section (think: Hot Chocolate Mod). Then it'll emulate a Wikipedia article. Conniving 02:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete - Been watching this one for a while now, doesn't seem to be making much improvement (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 25, 14:34
Delete. Peed it a while back and was unimpressed. It hasn't been touched since. Exhibits many of the classic VFD warning signs. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 16:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I would have made changes based on Under Users comments but i did not read his review because i never got an email to say changes had be made on the review page so if the admins dont mind could you plz give me a chance to fix it up.Evil_One275 | Talk | Contribs22:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Strong Keep. Um, you're kidding, right? 15 votes for and only 1 against isn't doing badly, and just being a little ugly isn't a delete reason. It is teh funny! --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 15:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep - If you mean by 'doing badly on VFH' that it's doing badly on VHF then...well you're not exacttly or even approximately correct. The Oblong Lobster 20:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
STRONG Keep - doing bad on VFH?? Ha ha ha ha ha, it's at 114%, maybe I'd laugh if it was April Fool's Day--SirManforman 20:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep What's wrong with you? --Kip > Talk•Works•• 21:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep out of spite. --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Filthy Whore! ^_^; (or at least backfire) Conniving 03:01, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete doing badly on VFH. Ugly. --Tampa 14:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete Hmmm Let's see if we can delete a basically front page article Mulehunter 19:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. The usual "high" standard of writing I've come to expect from Metal Gear articles. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 12:09, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete --SirManforman 18:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. "Solid Snake is the greatest clone in history, second only to Partially Liquid Solidus Snake". Hnng. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 12:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Murderous delete, if only to stop the never ending vandalism on it. Also, it's a terrible article. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete. And possibly CVP as it seems to be a vandal magnet. Even without vandalism, it's dreadful. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 11:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
CVP Now that was bad --Moneke 09:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
I've got to start writing some wrestling articles. The quality of them is consistently atrocious. These articles make me feel ashamed to be a wrestling fan. Delete. --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 12:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
CVP --GeneralInsineratehymn 13:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)