Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Rules and procedures:
- Before doing anything else, make sure that you are well versed on Uncyclopedia's deletion policy.
- If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
- But seriously, read the deletion policy.
- Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
- Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
- If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
- Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
- Add
{{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so may invalidate the vote.
- Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
- If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
- Thank you.
- No, really, thank you very much.
- Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
- Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a *
- * - Creates a bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the *).
- Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
- --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
- Do not revert edits of the administrators.
- If you are neither an administrator nor a designated poopsmith, do not remove anything from VFD; doing so will get you banned for a very long time.
VFD: Where bad articles go to get
recycled.
Pages for Deletion
Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nailbat before we tear our hair out in frustration.
This also applies to Uncyclopedia In jokes (see: Category:Uncyclopedia In-Jokes).
To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.
Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.
If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the
Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.
If VFD is full, or if you are an IP or a user of less than 4 days, and you want to report something as potential rubbish for us to vote on in the future, please proceed to the Poopsmith's Lounge. Just remember not to sit on the chairs.
Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Vape it . Too old for ICU, so I'll put it here. Anyway, page sucks. --Andorin K. (Silence! I vape you!) 04:27, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Shoop da Whoop shows its ugly, unfunny head again. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:38, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Baleet -- Also, penis. 04:44, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 14:26, 15 November 2009
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Two things. First of all, keep, and second of all, there is absolutely no fucking way that one vote is going to decide the fate of that many pages. If the subpage thing is a problem, we'll move them to their own pages. -- Also, penis. 04:06, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
- No MrN
04:13, Nov 15
Keep. Not funny but it's like an index. It's doing exactly all we can expect from it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:40, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Next you'll be nominating Special:Prefixindex/Un.
pillow talk 04:50, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Sadly, this is one of the biggest draws to Uncyclopedia. I think this all used to be on Stereotype before some noob rewrote it. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 06:40, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Unlike the recent Mohammed drawing, this is stereotyping with a direct nexus to comedy. However, the intro promises that the article will include cruft as in the various infoboxes, and I'd hate to see that happen. Spıke ¬ 12:30 15-Nov-09
- Keep. —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 14:26, 15 November 2009
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
So this would include the following sub-pages-
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Am ignorant about rap and can never tell whether an article's awfulness comes from its subject matter or is added value. But this article's first paragraph, in bold capitals, pleads that it is funny and explains why it is satire of things Killa $al has "raped" about. That's got to be worth something. Spıke ¬ 01:17 15-Nov-09
|
| Keep |
Keep. (Was Comment) As of the end of October, this article was an infobox, sections of one or two sentences apiece, and interminable lists. Pelargonium made it a real article, and the only problem I have with it is that the "excitable fanboy" tone of voice....PS--Now I get it--that is the humor--medieval Khmer ruler vs fanboy with a new power game card. Again my problem with alternate narrating voices. Given this, it's within range of being decent. Spıke ¬ 22:58 14-Nov-09 post-edited
|
| Delete |
Delete. I guess if you find excitable fanboy writing funny you might like this but this isn't even very good excitable fanboy writing. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:50, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete There is an Eric Raymond in the open-source movement, but this is more likely vanity. Spıke ¬ 18:55 14-Nov-09
- Madness? No! This is Sparta! ...no, actually it's madness.
pillow talk 19:41, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! Going on hiatus...
|
| Comments |
- Found while searching for meep, a word that local high-school principals are treating with suspensions and frantic phone calls to parents, although they don't know what it means. There is also a redirect page without "al-Qaida." Spıke ¬ 18:57 14-Nov-09
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
Delete. Short and horrible. Older version are even worse. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:49, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
Weak Delete. Article about an actual US football player basically has only one joke (steroids!). Putting it in Intensive Care at the end of 2006 only produced an inversion of the table. Author "Quadzilla99" left us in Sep-07; article got no attention in the off-season; recently incorporates real-life news on domestic assault. Notable in the real world, but not funny. I'd say offer the authors one final week to say something real, but there don't seem to be any authors. Spıke ¬ 17:12 14-Nov-09
- Delete, along with all sports articles not written by Gerrycheevers or, occasionally, RAHB.
pillow talk 19:39, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
Delete. This is actually worse than Spuppy. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:38, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Have a dumb idea and tirelessly pursue all the implications, sort of like the movie Cocoon. Spıke ¬ 17:29 14-Nov-09
- Weak delete. Much of it is coherent, but the more you read, the more tedious and unfunny and annoying it gets.
pillow talk 19:38, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- As the evil corporate creator of this half-breed is "Beauville Industries" and not HZ Corps., I trust there aren't twenty other interrelated articles on the site. Am now sick of clever Photoshopping in pursuit of a failed concept, and have changed my vote from Comment to Delete on Elephant Thursday. Spıke ¬ 17:29 14-Nov-09
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
Delete. What is it? A personal attack without the venom? A terrible fake animal aricle? Structured wibble? --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:27, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. It's either vanity or cyber-bullying, despite finally mentioning Kings of the same name. Spıke ¬ 17:16 14-Nov-09
- Delete. I actually don't think it's vanity or cyber-bullying; I think it's a terrible fake animal article.
pillow talk 19:36, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
Smite. Here's the summary: Boring paragraph, random paragraph, boring paragraph, giant list, giant unfunny quote collection. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:03, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Summary above is accurate, but omits that the sum is total crap. Spıke ¬ 18:08 13-Nov-09
- Crap. Trivia: you were raped by your best friend.
pillow talk 19:35, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete Because I'm such a rebel. A rebel without The Coors, even. That joke only works with a British accent. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 01:54, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
- Whoops! Do you mean The Corrs? Spıke ¬ 02:13 13-Nov-09
- Yeah. My bad. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 02:23, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete them all. Unreadability does not make me laugh.
pillow talk 02:22, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- If you think even one article is worth keeping, I encourage you to vote keep. Let's not make this too complicated. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 02:23, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
-
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete I checked to see if we had an article about The Coors that I could link to in my comment above and found this crappy article. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 01:54, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
{AAP} (Needs-photos tag) was copied into this article instead of used as a tag; Section 1 was usage guide for the tag; fixed. Spıke ¬ 02:06 13-Nov-09
- And
{VFD} added--I'm sure this is above my pay grade. Spıke ¬ 02:12 13-Nov-09
- Good concept (confuse Adolph Coors the brewer with Adolf Hitler), bad execution descending into babble. A fix would not be trivial. Spıke ¬ 02:10 13-Nov-09 post-edited
|
| Keep |
- Keep "I vandalized. That's the point." --Barack Obama --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 23:04, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Are you fucking joking?
Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 23:08, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, and also keep. -- Also, penis. 01:25, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
- Keep There's a picture of Varg in it. Why would you want to delete that? --monika 22:46, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
EXTERMINATE! Because it's fucking retarded, fucking disgusting and utterly pointless. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 11:46, 11 November 2009
Delete. "Vandalism" sums it up. Spıke ¬ 12:11 11-Nov-09
Delete. - No need to keep this junk around, poor hamsters are hard-pressed as they are to keep this site going... -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 21:30, 11 Nov
Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 21:53, Nov 11 2009
- Delete. I dot like it and niobody does because it is gay and stupid and ugly and retarted and fat.
pillow talk 18:21, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Best deleted and left behind the bike sheds. --RomArtus (talk) 19:16, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, and feel free to copy/paste this comment to a VFD vote of any of the other archives. They're all useless, and in the history anyway. Also, the terrible archive and rules template at the top of the main page. Also Syndrome. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:31, 14 Nov 2009
|
| Comments |
- Would somebody enlighten me to exactly what makes this different than any of the other vandalism archives? It doesn't seem there would be any good reason to delete just one of them... -- Also, penis. 20:57, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- My guess is that deleting #6 would leave a hole in the archives, which would be vandalism in and of itself. So this vote is really just an avant-garde sort of neo-vandalism designed to use the institution to vandalize its own byproducts: the sequestration and containment of undirected vandalism. Bravo, Socky. Bravo. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 23:13, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- RAHB: Mordillo's pretty consistently ruled that you have to take pages one at a time... and... so, since I think this particular page has no redeeming value, I favor deleting it. We can get to the others later.
pillow talk 23:21, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough, the votes will say what they do. I just thought it rather odd to start with number 6, when they're pretty much all incoherent. If this one ends delete though I expect to see the others up on here within the week. -- Also, penis. 01:24, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
I'd also say that any vote here would equally apply to all the other archives, as there's basically no difference between any of them. Voting on all at once would be a lot more efficient. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:33, 14 Nov 2009
|
| Keep |
- Keep. Crap keep. Remove the rubbish and it may live on in my view since 99 red balloons and Nena's unshaved armpits live on in the memory. Perhaps Nena helped bring down the Berlin Wall. --RomArtus (talk). 14:03, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete We still have more than 25,000 articles. We're obviously not deleting enough. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 01:08, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- What the hell...? ---Pelargonium
(Talk)
Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:29, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Notable subject matter, but this article is too bad to hide behind that excuse. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 21:44, Nov 11 2009
- Delete. You can't just name a celebrity, poop out a hundred Internet memes and Uncyclopedia in-jokes, and call that an article.
pillow talk 18:13, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Compared to Zach de la Rocha, this isn't a stupid concept (except for Sections 3 and 4) but a topical article with stupid jokes. Spıke ¬ 12:51 9-Nov-09
|
| Keep |
Keepish A little funny and based on a real "haunted" mansion. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:08, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Dittoes; it's not free-association babble but oddly describes something real. Spıke ¬ 12:10 10-Nov-09
|
| Delete |
- Delete. NOT FUNNY.
pillow talk 18:21, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Written in the style of ED and just not really that funny. » DJ "Reaper of Fail" Gentoo, now with wit, sarcasm, and even more obscure folk metal. Now in lime green! 01:16, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. It needs exorcising. --RomArtus (talk). 14:07, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 00:17, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Neh • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 21:37, Nov 11 2009
- Pointless in a bad way. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (vote!) 02:28, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Mighty Keep. On grounds of notability, being one of my favorite bands and the relative non-suckiness of the current version. • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 •
• • 11:36, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
- Mahm00shA, you seem to have a little time to improve this article to meet the standards of a reader like Romartus. Will you try? Spıke ¬ 01:18 7-Nov-09
- No, thanks. Band articles are not exactly my forte. • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 •
• • 05:50, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Well, I edited it. (New intro, deleted the "Discography" list, lightly edited throughout, no references to the author.) I know nothing about the band but claim the article is no longer an eyesore. (Anyone have photos?) Spıke ¬ 12:19 7-Nov-09
- I think it has been cut down too much now + no photos either. Radical surgery indeed !--RomArtus (talk). 14:10, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
- Put back the Discography if you like, which is the bulk of the liposuction. But it's just cheap plays on words. Spıke ¬ 17:27 8-Nov-09
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Gawdawful bandcruft that will probably never receive the rewrite that someone requested at some point.
pillow talk 18:12, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Unfunny and it is listing badly on one side. Besides fans - who else will want to waste time reading it for any possible humour ? --RomArtus (talk). 18:37, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
- But if fans found it funny (and if fans found that it related to anything) (and I'm not saying it does), wouldn't it be okay? Spıke ¬ 18:42 5-Nov-09
- If someone wants to write an article about a band (for example) and only wants to appeal to hard core fans , they can do it somewhere else. Same for a mad Star Trek fan as well in my view.--RomArtus (talk). 19:00, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
Time for a fan opinion! As a hopeless Nightwish fan, let me point out that notability != humor. Liking the article's subject does not excuse the suckiness of the article. As a Nightwish fan, my stonevote has been cast. » DJ "Reaper of Fail" Gentoo, now with wit, sarcasm, and even more obscure folk metal. Now in lime green! 00:57, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
- Nuke. I'm a NW fan too, but I would still like to see a -decent- uncyc page about them. Something that invokes laughter. --Dark_ApostropheThe Memory Hole 02:12, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 00:04, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 21:34, Nov 11 2009
|
| Comments |
- It does suck. The first sentence of the intro says so. And it invites the reader not to continue. I did, and encountered everything from self-absorption to coding errors. Spıke ¬ 01:54 6-Nov-09
- Make that three.
» DJ "Reaper of Fail" Gentoo, now with wit, sarcasm, and even more obscure folk metal. Now in lime green! 01:33, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Grousing |
- This needs a multi-day clock that we could watch counting down, like they have on eBay. Spıke ¬ 23:07 14-Nov-09
|
Archived VFD Discussions