Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization/Archive

This is the archive for Colonization Nomination Winners. All old nominations of winners will be posted here.

January - February 2009

Al Gore

Score: +6

• For. I'm super-serial about this one. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 02:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
• Yikes. What a massive pile of shit. —Sir SysRq (talk) 02:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
• While I think it would be much easier to write an article about Jerry Seinfeld(What's the deal with Jerry Seinfeld?), I think that Mr. Gore's page is more high-traffic, and needs a rewrite more urgently. For. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 02:36, Feb 17
• For. Some concepts: encyclopedic tone of an overweight crusader constantly fighting for lost causes, or a first-person perspective of a conservative trying to convince the reader that Al Gore does not exist (slideshow optional). -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
• for. i like your second idea, froggy. kind of like a conservative's assurances that global warming is imagined...only with al gore as the imagined part. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Yeah, some great ideas, TKF. I love the second one, with Al Gore not existing and all. Much funnier than...whatever the hell is going on over there right now. —Sir SysRq (talk) 19:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
    • This article has a fever...and the only prescription is less South Park... Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 19:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
      • Fucking seriously. If any colonizers write anything about manbearpig or Gore being super cereal into this article I will personally tear out their tongue through their asshole. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 23:00, Feb 17
        • Yeah, for every reference to Manbearpig that I find in this article, I will kill all of you. EDIT: Leddy, isn't TKF's second idea just tops? —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
          • Yeah, I'd write that shit. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 01:16, Feb 18
            • I'd totally write that. I'd write the hell out of it. For three straight days. I don't care how chaffed I get. —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:17, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
              • Fuckin' A. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 01:23, Feb 18
• WTF??? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

March - April 2009

Jew/Jews/Jewish

Score: +11

• For. Dear god, this is a clusterfuck of suck. I'm making all three of these the same nomination for now, because we may just need to consolidate all of these into one article. If we do this, we may also need to have a vote as to whether or not to extend Colonization of these articles to a fortnight (for just this one time) in order to get everything done. But as big of a project as this would be, I think this is urgent and in dire need of rescue. —Sir SysRq (talk) 23:18, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. I think we should do these to celebrate the recent 'cratting of Mordillo, and the expanding of the Yiddish cabal. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 17:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

• What cabal? There is no Cabal! Gis ym esiladnav! _LOB 22:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

• 4 - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 18:12, Feb 19
• בעד ~ 20:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
• For per Mordillo. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
• For. Some concepts: overplaying the tragedies and suffering of the Jewish people while dropping subtle hints that they, ironically, control the world despite their numerous setbacks, perhaps even to the extent that they have a hand in their own destruction. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:15, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Jews did the holocaust? - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 03:06, Feb 23
    • Cute. —Sir SysRq (talk) 03:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
• for. wikipedia has one article (jew) that jews and jewish redirect to. let's do that. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
• For. The most needing and visible nomination. --Guildensternenstein 14:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
• For. This should have been done a long time ago.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 07:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
• For - The existing articles are randomish and nonsensical. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 20:49, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
• For. Considering this is probably one of the most high traffic topics for humour website, this needs serious Cillit Bang. Gis ym esiladnav! _LOB 22:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Michael Jackson

Score: +9

• N♥m && f♥r. Since VFD refuses to do anything about it, I guess it's up to us. —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
• for. a perfect candidate for colonization. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
• Good Lord! This survived VFD? -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:04, 3 Mar
• For Couldnt be much worse if we tried. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
• For because I love the Jackster (he's a musical god god damnit!), and something good ought to be created out of him for this wiki. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
• For--Sycamore (Talk) 07:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:54, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• For The guy was a musical genius who allowed his pedophilia hobby to destroy his career. We may not love Michael Jackson, but we could help the article at least be readable. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• For The current article is too long, incoherent, unfunny, random and boring. Plus, 'Michael Jackson' is propably among the most visited pages on uncyclopedia, hell, who wouldnt go for Michael Jacksons page on a parody website? SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 22:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Britain, Great Britain, The Former Great Britain, UK etc

Score: +5

I think it's a bit stupid that we have 4 articles on the same subject, and all of them are pretty medicore. There are many talented British uncyclopedians, as well as dirty Colonists who can contribute, and as such I propose we colonise the United Kingdom. Scotland and France got featured, and I think with a bit of work, so could Britain.--CrabPope 22:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• we cant colonize four articles at the same time =) SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 22:49, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Not with that attitude, mahmoosha --CrabPope 22:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

aite, just kidding. But you really need to choose one article only. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 23:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, we did do multiple articles with the Jew colonization. Or actually, we wrote one article and made the other titles redirect to "Jew". —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

thats still one article, socky.. Anyway, are you suggesting doing the same here, with Great Britain being the main one? SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 23:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Something like that, yes. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

me too SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 23:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• For. --CrabPope 22:39, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• Merge. We can do much better with those limey Brits. I like this much better than doing MySpace. —Sir SysRq (talk) 23:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• For per SysRq. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• For. It will be good to strike back at the Empire. The colonizers will be colonized! --^Dame 23:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

ya, right -- Good Save The Queer :D SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 23:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• For. For two reasons: 1. This has to much potential for hilarity and 2.It's about time the Brits get a taste of their own medicine.Saberwolf116 03:21, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Barack Obama

Score: +9

• nom + for. certainly the commander-in-chief deserves better than this? i'm thinking maybe an intertwining of barack and the rock (professional wrestler). SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
• For. Obama is a high profile article, it should be in peak condition. The current one is way too cluttered. --^Dame 17:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
• Trim the fat! Saberwolf116 17:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
• Socialist For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
• Five SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 23:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
• PHWHORE I think this is one of those things that'll be searched by new users, so lets make it good. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 18:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
• For per Colin. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
• Everyone loves Obama. |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 00:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• Dwayne "Barack" Johnson -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

April-May 2009

Wikipedia

Score: 8

• nom & for. according to Special:Mostpopulararticles, our 7th most popular article. and it's terrible. it's one of those old 2005 features that would never, ever be featured by today's standards. my computer crashed trying to wallow through the thousands of edits. this is a quintessential example of what colonization aims to do: make our prominent articles better. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• For. Per the guy I stole my new signature from Mahm00shA 17:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC) dinosaur will be much easies, shorter and funnier. 06:40, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

you can thank Leatherboundbooks for the sig, i stole it from him back in '07. to be fair, he started it by stealing my freedom. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:55, 16 April 2009

That title right before your name is the best part of the whole sig. —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

(UTC)

From what I remember, Leatherboundbooks actually stole his sig from insineratehymn, whose sig is a direct ripoff of Ghelae's, as per this handy guide. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 04:37, Apr 20

ya, we live in a civilized world, here in Uncyc :) Mahm00shA 05:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

• Communist for. Saberwolf116 21:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• W♥v. —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• Vote #1 Jimbo Wales!!! |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 03:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• Jimbo's on my sigbook! » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow » 13:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• ' For.' --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
• Of course-- You know what the music means... Our time is up. 23:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

June 2009

You

Score: +8

1. Om nom nom|Phwhore I'm sick of reverting and still seeing it as shit. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 19:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
2. For. Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 18:10 May 30 '09
3. Yep  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 07:02, 7 June 2009
4. For. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:03, 9 Jun
5. For..--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 16:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
6. For.. --^Dame 14:54, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
7. for. this is a perfect candidate: a very prominent article that has potential but is rampant with IP nonsense. also, a golden opportunity for blatatn overuse of the USERNAME template! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
8. Sure. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:30, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

July 2009

God

Score: +7

• for. exceedingly long and rambling. this is very very popular. i think we can do something good with this. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:30, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
• For, but I think it might be a good idea to change the whole article to a redirect to The artist formerly known as God.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 19:00, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
• For merging with SysRq. —Sir SysRq (talk) 17:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
• For merging with SysRq as well. Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! 09:06, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
• For redirecting to User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:43, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• Spiritual for. That is, if I were a part of IC, which I'm not. But if I were, I would totally vote for this one, which I am not doing, given my non-membership....What? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 16:56, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

What's with the FA template on this page? Was this featured? I found this, but the dates are wrong, and the "featured version" looks unlikely that it was featured. Can we IC an FA??? If only there was an admin here... Oh, there is this thing also... MrN  Fork you! 17:02, Jul 9

Well since they already colonized Wikipedia.... Then again, you had gone and left us all in the dust at that point in time, so I guess maybe you shouldn't have known...grumble grumble.... Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:09, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

God does suck balls currently. Not literally you understand. We maybe... It's probably worth checking the history thoroughly if this one is used for IC. I'm sure there is some really good stuff mixed in there, especially if this was featured. /me looks the other way and wanders off ... MrN  Fork you! 17:13, Jul 9

nuts...you know, when i nominated this i didn't even realize it had been featured...kind of a big thing to miss, innit? anyway, we already colonized Wikipedia which was previously featured, so i don't think we'll be stepping on too many toes by overhauling this. but the history will be throroughly checked, particularly the featured version. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Well the "featured version" code looks wrong to me, and I fancy that's not the "best" version. Looking at the talk page Modus appears to favour God/Funny version... MrN  Fork you! 17:21, Jul 9

This is a 2005 feature we're talking about, ya know. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:33, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Here, I found the featured version for you. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:39, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

• Yo. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:37, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• For Blasphemy time. Did you know they're making blasphemy illegal in Ireland? [1] -- incredible Ape (exemplify) (Riot Porn) 17:31, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. It's time to revamp this article, and show some love to an article that probably hasn't had much since it was featured back in '05. Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 14:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

September - December 2009

Transformers

Score: +5

• For. You know why. Plus it's terrible fancruft. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:43, 22 Jul
• For. I saw the movie, and orgasmed all over the theater. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 20:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. I'm voting for everything because I'll help with anything. You know, Colin, after you left the theater somebody had to sit in your seat. :P Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 01:59, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
• For. It needs it and it should be fun. --^Dame 01:53, September 12, 2009 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:53, 14 September 2009

February 2010

Creationism

Score: +5

• Nom and For. I'll get the ball rolling. A major topic that has some stuff I thought was good around August 2005 and May 2006, but currently is, well, in need of some serious work. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 05:51, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
• For. I'll jump on your ball! Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 06:41, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For. I have just successfully nullified my vote... how creative is that?  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  02 Feb 2010 ~ 04:22 (UTC)
• For Definitely. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:47, February 2, 2010 (UTC)
• We desperately need a better article. Some of the images might still be useful though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:28, 4 February 2010

Batman

Score: +4

• Nom and For. Another well-known topic, I looked through about a dozen edits of this from the beginning to the present. Didn't find much--we could do the Caped Crusader much better. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 05:55, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
• For. I know stuff about Batman! (Did you know he once carried a gun?)  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  01 Feb 2010 ~ 06:22 (UTC)
• For. I'm all for helping out Batman and his life partner ward Dick Grayson.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 23:34, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Four Seems jumbled and nonsensical to the point where the humour is lost, I think we can do Batty Boy up something better.--Striker2117 19:38, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Discordianism

Score: +4

Golden Apples

• Nom and For. A lot of people know about Discordianism and this article could be a lot better if we work on it! Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 02:22, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
• For I think that the article tried to go too overboard with the Chaos thing and needs order to maintain the balance of the Sacred Chao. --Striker2117 19:32, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
• For But it should mean the people participating should research and study the wiki pages, sacred books, and unholy chants in the night. ~   3:36 4.3.2.m.x
• Four breaking a tie. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 03:41, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

March 2010 to September 2010

Kitler

• Nom + For. Now moar popular on the internet from media stories sensationalism about the web site www.catsthatlooklikehitler.com we really should make this presentable, as it is the 3rd link on Google.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  29 Jul 2010 ~ 06:55 (UTC)

Hershey's

• Nom+For. This article is disgusting. Plus, the article is short and needs a heavy rewrite. |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 05:11, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Dinosaur

• Nom+For. We really need a better article on this subject. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:03, 16 June 2010
• FOR. This could be dangerous. Lordarcadian 04:24, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Agreed --DougalJabber at me. 12:32, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
• For. What else do we vote for? PersonalEditor6003 talk • e-mail 17:44, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

My User Page

• Self Nom + For. It's obvious to me that's it's full of fail.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  18 Jun 2010 ~ 02:46 (UTC)

Comment. Normally when I start to work on user page rewrites people start screaming vandal! and get upset. Doesn't everyone want a huge glowing green phallus on their page? Sir CPT Dr PuppyOnTheRadio GUN UmP WotM NotM FP VFP VFH CM POTM UGM 00:40, June 5, 2009 Friday, 02:49, Jun 18 2010 UTC

- Comment. How about if I promise to keep the finished project for at least a month? (And yes, everyone secretly DOES want huge glowing green phallus on their page.)  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  18 Jun 2010 ~ 03:44 (UTC)

December 2011

Baseball +1 for

• For. The best thing about the page is the opening pic, which should be kept (Touchdown), and most of the rest is huffable. Some pics and lines can be kept. Uncy should have a great article on this sport, which is America's national sport and Japan - before the reactor took out the country - used to play it. Many other countries play Baseball. So for. Aleister 1:46 1-4-'11

Hershey's +0 for

• Legacy Nom

Horse-drawn submarine +2 for

• Nom + For This was on VFD, I voted keep on it so we could colonize it. It was kept, and here it is. Please vote for, or else it will have been kept for nothing. --Magic Snow man ☃ 22:50, December 13, 2010 (UTC)
• For. + already working on it... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

BACON +2 for

• For. & nom. Bacon is too important to have such an imperfect article. Coronium 19:03, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
• This guy -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:01, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

U2

Score: 2

• For. Wikipedia had a featured article on these dudes, and all we can come with is this VFD worthy shit? Come on, we're better that that! --Scofield 20:08, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
• We'll do it |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 06:08, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

Prison

Score: +1

• Right now it's just a bunch of lists. A lot of bunch of lists. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:30, December 2, 2011 (UTC)