From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Everyone that is not SysRq (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +1 motherfuckers that are not SysRq
  • Nom && for. All y'all suck. All of you need to be banned. BAN ALL OF UNCYC. Except me. I want this place all to myself. sirIgnignokt.gifsysrq @ 21:26 Dec 23
  • Symbol against vote Against. Come on, thats like saying ' Huff every article except for the Main Page! 'User:Citation Needed/sig 01:35, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
    • That's not a bad idea, either. sirIgnignokt.gifsysrq @ 01:52 Dec 24
  • Symbol for vote For Both Ideas are great and besides I haven't got banned enough. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 22:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


Score: +2 People who felt like something needs to be done about {{Username}}
  • Symbol for vote Nom and For According to our recent Sign post this guy has claimed a million victims. I am voting for before it claims <insert name here> as his next victim. Also I really strongly suggest that <insert name here> would vote for banning {{USERNAME}}. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote We've done this several times already. And yet...he continues to claim victims. If we ignore past experience, then this will certainly work. sirErr.gifsysrq @ 17:04 Nov 28

Cajek (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +8 Users Who wish they can ban him now and 593894379 more times.
  • Symbol for vote Nom and For Since I don't have the super dooper power to ban this guy like the admins do this is how I would try to ban him. Anyway check his ban log. That really sums it up all together. If you do indeed have the power to ban this guy go ahead and block him, you wouldn't be the only one who has done it. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 09:08, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote CAKE J! JudgeZarbi Icons-flag-gb TALK 14:48, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
  • For as per Zarbi. Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:28, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
  • For Yadda yadda yadda __NOCAJEK__ Yadda yadda yadda. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 12:13, Oct. 22, 2008
  • Symbol for vote Seems obvious. Very obvious. --iseditor.user Comments/Criticism 21:38, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Against. That's just what they'd expect us to do... --UU - natter UU Manhole 12:08, Oct 27
  • For. Ugh--Rabies Turtle 22:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote Hooray! Reasonless lesserful banning! Sire !! -4- (18:35 11-8-2008)
  • For per above. Its been awhile since he was last banned.--Mnbvcxz (Annoy) 20:55, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote It's about time! -Meta 500 03:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Judge Zarbi (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +5 random templates to get complemented

No longer legitimate. Banned forever. Sire !! -4- (01:41 11-21-2008)

Hinoa (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

  • Symbol for vote Nom + Extreme Lesbian For. Seriously, this douchebag thinks he can just swan off whenever the hell he feels like it? I say we ban him. —Hinoa talk.kun 05:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote FOR teh bannage I don't care for the Admin loophole. Give it to Hinoa already. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 05:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote Banninate! JudgeZarbi Icons-flag-gb TALK 20:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote Ban. Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:30, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Nintendorulez (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +6 votes just because we can

EugeneKay (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: -4

Kip the Dip (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +8 Users that love to block Kip 50 more times

Heerenveen (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +13 Users who are surprised that they even need to vote for such an obvious ban
Personal tools