This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at FFS.
Self-Nom & For - Becasue I never get picked for anything, and I keep making Fatal mistakes. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 08:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
I pick Sawblade5! because he's one of those people who uses a 5 as an S. Either that, or he killed the other 4 Sawblades... no wait, that would be pretty cool. -- Le Cejak•<-> 13:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Nom & For--SirManforman 13:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
This time voting for him won't be a mistake. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 13:32, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Absolutely --SirManforman 13:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
START A HUGE WAR AND KILL 10000'S OF INNOCENT PE0PLE WILL HE?!!? BLOCK HIM 4 GOOD Elassint 19:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC) (You know what would be funny, if this ban sucseeds we can block the White House's ip address! ElassintThrow things at me 23:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC))
Self-Nom & For - This guy is hopeless--Keysniper 11:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Sure, because I'm bored Yeah. I didn't even look at the guys name or anything he's ever done, but I'm sure that somebody out there dislikes him. Maybe he was a bully on the playground once. Maybe he made fun of someone's mom. Give banning a chance, I always say. -- Le Cejak•<-> 19:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
NF. The kid needs it until he learns the definitions of words like "joke," "satire," and "funny." -- Village Idiot♠KUN Free Speech 13:12, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Self For - I was already nominated, if you looked at the contents--SirManforman 13:14, 23
Nom & For--SirManforman 01:08, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Against - What? --AAA! (AAAA) 07:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Well, you did nom him for UGotM, he is just returning the favor :) ~ 07:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Ah yes. That takes me back.... --AAA! (AAAA) 07:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Against. This seems like a payback to me. So, as per my vote on UgotM. If you didn't smile when you nom him Manforman, and I beliave you didn't - I'll be standing in front of him waving my hands in a threatening manner. ~ 07:16, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
No. If you're serious, absolutely serious, then put simply you sir are a prick. He's a good contributor, a great guy, was once (and I think still is) an op on IRC, very funny (and not stupid), but if you mean by "flamer" he's a flaming homo, then you're STILL a prick (albeit a correct prick.) --Asema 07:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Let's watch our manners here shall we? ~ 10:52, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Can I still be a flamer if I have a flame thrower? --AAA! (AAAA) 10:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Comment - AAA! is an IRC op?--SirManforman 20:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
No, lost ops, since sannse said I wasn't ready yet. But that doesn't mean I can't get it later... --AAA! (AAAA) 07:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Nom & For- Hes gone ban crazy, in fact I estimate that by 2009 he'll have banned everyone on uncyclopedia, he must be stopped! -- Mr.ZinkyWinks 18:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
It was the pirate article, I thought it should have at least poked a little fun at ninjas, I had no intention to start a flame war, I just thought it was funny, guess not..... Mr.ZinkyWinks 18:34, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
FOR AND POINT THREE NINE TWO NINE SEVEN FOUR FOUR FOUR REPEATING --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Nom & For - according to his block log, he hasn't been blocked at all, and thus needs one, NOW!--SirManforman 22:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Fir - Trees that is. But in reality, Against, for really no good reason. -RAHB 08:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
The Giant Redwood. The Larch. The Fir! The mighty Scots Pine! The lofty flowering Cherry! The plucky little Apsen! The limping Roo tree of Nigeria! The towering Wattle of Aldershot! The Maidenhead Weeping Water Plant! The naughty Leicestershire Flashing Oak! The flatulent Elm of West Ruislip! The Quercus Maximus Bamber Gascoigni! The Epigillus! The Barter Hughius Greenus! With my best buddy by my side, we'd sing! Sing! SING! --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Self Nom & For I hate this guy so much. All he ever does is yell at people and act like he's God. AND he's a hypocrite and an asshat. Infiniban him. --Roman Dog Bird 00:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Douche. I also heard he may be a girl, which is just unheard of on the internets!--TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Nom + Strong For. This guy is so dumb. Not only did he nominate himself, but he nominated himself twice. Seriously, what a fagbag. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:57, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
AS PER ROMAN DOG BIRD. SEE, I USED ALL BOLD CAPS JUST LIKE HIM 'CAUSE MY FEELINGS ARE THE SAME AND HOPEFULLY THE BOLD CAPS HELP TO BETTER ILLUSTRATE THAT FACT.P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 16:28, Sep 3, 2007
OK. You asked for it. •••Necropaxx(T){~} 03:02, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Against because this is such a lacklustre attempt at an FFS entry and didn't entertain me enough. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Nom and For User is worthless, contributing nothing but crap articles that they should be banned for. Only other thing the user does is troll IRC and make pointless VFH noms and act as the sole dissenter on featured articles, making a complete ass of himself. Also, the userpage is horrible and abuses the <choose> tag to no end. How this use has not been named UGotM is a mystery to me, even though that is a fate worse than ED. Oh, and he's a useless name-changing prick. EugeneKaywuzhere(whinethank) 15:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
For. What a loser! •••Necropaxx(T){~} 03:03, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
For. You asked for it. •••Necropaxx(T){~} 01:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
For You might have created Grueslayer, but what have you done for us lately? Huh, HUH? --Kip > Talk•Works••
For unbulleted lists that come out horrendously in MediaWiki, Against the user. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 13:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Nom Because she's been getting way too much good press lately and is liable to get a big head if everyone doesn't immediately call her a poopy-head. Also, this could be her last chance to get a meaningful ban if she gets opped this month. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Against I am outraged that I would be so callous as to nom me for a ban. I am very hurt by this nomination, and will never speak to myself again. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
MEDIC!!!! MEDIC!!!! OFFICER DOWN!!! ~ 00:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
I'd vote for, just to allow her some time off, to have some baked beans on toast and to ponder...but...I...just...can't....so. Against. ~ 00:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm quite disappointed you didn't call me a poopy-head, Ins. Mainly because I would really like to see you say "Poopy-head", because it would be so out of character! -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 10:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
For - Seriously, she does so much for the website. She needs some forced time off. --CapercornFLAME!what?UNATOOWS 01:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Against - While being untrue will mean she will break many hearts, strangely that's not a bannable offence. --BBBBBBBBB! 22:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment No need to give me time off any more guys - Famine already decided to give me a holiday, and I've been gone two days. I would have tried to have it overturned, but instead I sat back and wrote this: UnBooks:An Uncyc Ban Diary. FFS-ers and Ban-Patrollers may like to know what exactly it is they're voting for...! :-) -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 00:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Stronge Against If we ban such a wonderful user like Strange but untrue, whom cleans-up and helps out whenever she can, than Uncyclopedia is on the brink of losing it's heart. Never mine. I didn't notice she nominated herself. --Kip > Talk•Works••
For - She's a poopy-head. Are you happy now Sbu? SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 12:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Jeez, she was so nice to me. I once even did stupid stuff to her talk page, asked her a n00bish question, and posted an unwanted comment on her current talk. Plus, she's always doing work for the site. How dare she be so presumptuous? FOR!-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 18:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Cardinal mistake, mentioning breasts in Uncyclopedia. I personally am unaffected, but if I were you I'd run like the wind, bullseye.-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 01:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
For What a douchebag and attention whore. --Kip > Talk•Works••
The icon of what the bottom of Uncyclopedia has to offer. A disgrace to Uncyclopedia, Wikia, the internet, his country of origin, and possibly the entire human race. I question many nights why the existence of such a sad and worthless user exists, only to be left without answers. This user's lack of morals, humanity, and logical judgment appall me continuously. I'd use bland insults like "douchebag", "asshat", and "fucktits" to insult this user, but he has probably heard them all before ad nauseum and is now numb to them, regardless of how true they are. Truly a despicable person. Against.
Look I may not be the best writer here, but I'm definitely not a pimple on the ass of this site. I contribute a fair amount to Uncyclopedia. I've only been blocked twice, an they were 1) a one second ban by request, and 2) for helping out a noob the wrong way. I only made that Block Me! page as a joke to see if anyone would take it seriously. After this vote I'm have it deleted, as I now know it only ruins my integrity. --Kip > Talk•Works••
Settle down, buddy, emc's just joking around. Notice that he ultimately voted against banning you. This is Uncyclopedia: don't take anything seriously. We all know you're a good writer and a very helpful user.--PhlegmLeoispotter* (garble! jank!) 16:46, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Strong For - He's the Wikipedia Dictator. We need revenge on him, duh!--SirManforman 00:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment - Why can't they actually ban these idiots for long periods of times instead of 20 seconds?--SirManforman 12:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Because this is a joke. If someone's really a dick here, then we don't put them on FFS, we ask admins to ban them. That is all.-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 20:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Terrorist, eh? I always knew there was something suspicious about him. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
More like "walking down the streets of Paris". Germans prefer to march in the shade. Still, I'm hesitant to label Jumbo Whales a terrorist. After all, one can negotiate with terrorists. --66.102.80.239 18:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Actually, he has more contributions, he created User:Jimbo Wales which was deleted. But still, I urge all of you Americans to vote against the Germans (who are the same guys who sided with Hitler during WWII who are now siding with Jimbo Wales.)--SirManforman 20:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
For We are not a dumping ground for wikirejects from other projects. I am getting a little tired of learning of this user's antics by being informed by the whois server. --Carlb 12:03, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Against Do you know whom your dealing with? He most likely has power over us. --Kip > Talk•Works••
Comment: He's never here. We could do revenge on him all we want. Also, he's not a sysop. Nothing will happen to you unless you message him at his Wikipedia where...--SirManforman 12:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment - He's Wikia Staff. He can do whatever he wants. He could rename you to s*itface if he so pleased. --CapercornFLAME!what?UNATOOWS 16:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Ban because he put an article on VFD when there were already 15 articles still being voted on, and he put Fisher Price on VFD, and he never puts the VFD template on the pages he puts on VFD. --Dexter111344 14:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Nom and For He acted like a douche to me just because I quoticided one of his articles. Now I'm going to return the favor. --GeneralInsineratehymn 17:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
For I agree with Insineratehymn and Leoispotter...he is a douche. also take a look under the "How to: not be funny" section in his userpage. Moron --(Bonner) (Talk). 22:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Don't ban Aww was he mean to you? Do you want me to call his mommy and have him put in time-out were he belongs?
Doesn't matter now, because I scared him off. --GeneralInsineratehymn 16:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Nom and For Because, to ban him for a bit, the admins will have to unban him, and then he will be unbanned after his FFS ban. MarshalUncyclopedian!Talk to me!
For! He'll probably never notice he's unbanned, and that's where all the joy comes in! --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Against - Nin is gone, Famine was correct in his decission, while he will be missed, it is best that he is gone. --CapercornFLAME!what?UNATOOWS 23:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment That Uncyclopedia is in a position where outsiders have taken full control and are free to rename you to "Fuckhead" at will is part of the problem. Egads! Whatonearth was Chron thinking? --User:Fuckhead 18:44, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Against Look at This instead.--Scott 04:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
For - Jimbo Wales is staff too. Too many outsiders being staff. Grrr. --CapercornFLAME!what?UNATOOWS 23:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
For - This speaks for itself. --BBBBBBBBB! 22:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
LOL I know it's fun, but be more creative with your reasons; if wikia didn't host us we'd have to pay ourselves. If you're willing to pay, contact me via email and I'll give you an address for you to send money to, then I won't have to get a job ^^ :P —Braydie 22:53, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Well just ship over a couple of high-end servers like the Brazilians have and, if we like them, maybe we'll buy them. We prefer to get our hands on the actual merchandise before completing offers or reffering friends to do the same. --BBBBBBBBB! 02:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
For - She barely comes on anymore, which means all jobs are left to sannse now. Poor sannse... --AAA! (AAAA) 22:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
A☭AINST, and my vote is infinite. 12:43, 26 July 2007
Conditional Supportonly if she is nominated for UGotM as well--SirManforman 13:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Nom.For being involved in any way with the whole http://uncyclopedia.wikiachina.cn debacle. Registering a domain to an oppressive communist country for a wiki that anyone can edit is beyond dumb, even compared to her previous infamous stunt of removing template links from en: to Taiwan. --Carlb 18:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Why don't we get bots like this around here anymore?
Score: 2 illegal immigrant bots
Nom & for: It's taking jobs away from middle-class Uncyclopedians! --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 21:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Against for two reasons. 1 - its a bot. As long as an admin makes his contributions stop taking up all of recent changes, I'm not gonna care what he does. 2 - he is only inter - wiking. I don't know how to do that, nor do i have the time, motivation or language skills to do that. Just leave the bot to do what it's made for.--GeneralAndMin.THEDUDEMAN 00:27, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Comment Individual admins on en: don't have the power to make his contributions stop taking up all of recent changes. Resistance is useless, capacitance is your only hope, you will be assimilated.
For That damn bot detracted from finding vandalism. Who knows how much crap slipped through the cracks
Against - I like this guy. He won't respond to my comment on his talk page though. I even translated it into his language. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 01:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Ay ay ay! Ceta botta est une boota!! NO ES BUENO POR EL WIKI!! AY CARAMBAA!!!!!!!! -- Ludicolo 01:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Against He's only taking the jobs Uncyclopedians don't want. Stop being racist, emc. --GeneralInsineratehymn 02:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
For the day we let machines work for us, would be the end of us all. ~ 12:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC)