Nevermind, my recent changes didn't show the account creation
Not really ban worthy in either case, more annoying... Re-report if persistent. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 00:17, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
  • Llwy-ar-lawr (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) - I have already blocked this user on Welsh and Belarusian Uncycs. I have to study for exams and can't be trusted not to edit Uncyclopedia instead. School is out in two weeks so no need to make the block any longer than that please. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr talkcontribs 12:50, June 9, 2013 (UTC)
    This block request is also weird and possibly disruptive; you can give it as the block reason if you want. I'd better be off now. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr talkcontribs 13:02, June 9, 2013 (UTC)
    I have done, although I suspect you will wear being-banned-by-Spike as a crown. Unfortunately for your studies, I cannot ban you from reading Uncyclopedia, which is often as amusing as contributing. Good luck and welcome back! Spıke Ѧ 13:29 9-Jun-13
Could be a misfire on the IP's behalf. Not a bannable offence....yet...muhahaha ~Jewriken.GIF 19:50, June 3, 2013 (UTC)
Where did he spam? Only see one entry on the log. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:08, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
If you go to the bottom of the only page he contributed to (Ban Patrol talk page) he says that he wrote a QVFD spam article however he says this under a different IP so there is no point in blocking him as he changes IP. He also asks to be blocked under that message with this IP name. See for yourself and then make a decision. I'm not sure now. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:28, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
I'll say no... For now... It was almost a week ago and pretty much completely harmless. Re-add if other issues arise. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 11:05, May 23, 2013 (UTC)
Right ho then. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:01, May 23, 2013 (UTC)
Created a one word article, that is not spam. Might merit a 2 hour ban to read HTBFANJS. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 01:10, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

The two users below claim they are not cyberbullying but it seems to me like they are. Please review their changes to Curtle Ablitt before making a decision. Thanks. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 20:10, April 27, 2013 (UTC)

Second offense for Tylerarcher97; Joehova gets a token ban mostly just to place it on the record. Spıke Ѧ 20:58 27-Apr-13

Revolted627 Vandalised User:ScottPat, User:Anton199 and User:ScottPat/American Revolution. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 19:13, April 19, 2013 (UTC)

Keep it brief; I can check his Contribs myself--more easily, in fact, if you use {{User}} rather than {{U}}, as instructed above. He is perma-banned. Do not feed the trolls by expressing your disapproval at his vandalism--my overture to him was forged; see Forum:Wikia's robo-welcome. Spıke Ѧ 19:20 19-Apr-13

Ghostmasta89 Vandalised User:MrN9000. PS - Just realised he's a noob on his first day so I'll warn him about his actions instead. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 18:15, April 17, 2013 (UTC)

Seems like the right move, though I too toyed with banning him, as he seems to be pursuing a vendetta from long ago. Your warning was appropriate except that telling him you had almost banned him was you throwing my weight around. Spıke Ѧ 18:28 17-Apr-13

Sorry. I meant that I almost had him down for being banned. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 18:31, April 17, 2013 (UTC)

That warning is just as effective. However, I've now reviewed all his contributions, including his changes that ruined an UnNews sure to be featured soon, and he is gone for 2 weeks. Spıke Ѧ 18:40 17-Apr-13
  • ThatGuyThatNobodyReallyLikes (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) Recreates Pokemon center in mainspace after I userspaced it and told him why; essentially a revert war. Spıke Ѧ 02:29 29-Jan-13
    It doesn't really seem that way to me, try not to bite the newer users. We have the construction tag so he can work on it in mainspace if he wants and calling his article an "unfunny stub" isn't particularly encouraging. I've left a note on his talk page and will delete the userspace article. --ChiefjusticeXBox 07:46, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
  • Tetrageist (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) May need a more memorable lesson than yesterday's that user pages are not theology chat rooms, and against calling his adversary a twat. Spıke Ѧ 00:07 29-Jan-13
    Left a note on user page. Don't know who Tetrageist is addressing there. Comments don't seem to be aimed at any particular user. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 00:47, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
    Yup, let's see what he says. The History shows there has been a back-and-forth, and hardly relative to humor. Spıke Ѧ 00:59 29-Jan-13
I think that might be stupidity rather than malice. --Mn-z 20:09, January 20, 2013 (UTC)