Can't really block him for that, as much as I feel watching/enjoying Big Brother should be punished in the manner Ingsoc intended, he can use his talk page for that if he wants. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:45, June 5, 2012 (UTC)
Update: Vandal Spree.--Iwillkillyou 333 TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 22:56, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

Nootchy-Nootchy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) - vandal. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usSun, May 13 '12 7:06 (UTC)

Seems to have actually undone everything they did. Needs to be watched a bit more but I don't think a ban is in order. --ChiefjusticeDS 10:48, May 12, 2012 (UTC)
This dude is NOT a vandal, but might end up being one unless you give better reasons for your reverts. Use undo a bit more please dude. This guys is trying to improve the article IMO, but needs help. Not a ban. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 11:10, Apr 28
I protected the page in question as it's a redirect, but I don't think he's a vandal, more someone who does not understand, and maybe needs some help. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 00:10, Apr 15
Only one edit Gabriel Turner (talk) 10:45, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
I can find nothing requiring a block. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 16:19, Apr 13
Doesn't seem so bad, not brilliant contributions but we all have to start somewhere. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:24, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
Looks more like he or she is making a sincere effort to be amusing. I don't think banning them is in order. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:09, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
I was already banned indefinitely but it was then shortened to two hours which expired Sockpuppet of a banned user (talk) 13:45, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
Deleting the page was enough here, though I see two I.P. addresses were used to access the same content. If the page reappears again then I will ban them both. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:48, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
Not a vandal. Bad edits != vandal. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 14:36, Apr 6
Sorry, I only assumed that because their edits were rolled back Gabriel Turner (talk) 14:47, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
It's cool. I guess if the person who did the rollback thought that the person needed to be nominated for BP then they would have nominated it themselves. Also, no need to use the talkback template so much, but looks like you just figured that out. Have fun. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 15:14, Apr 6
Will give the dude a second chance as he has made another ok edit, and this "vandalism" was to a talk page and could (ok maybe not) have been an accident. If he causes more problems, then I ban. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 14:36, Apr 6
Dude appears to be able to enter into a discussion about his edits and I'm happy to let him do so for now. Telling you to shut the fuck up does not constitute grounds for a ban. Edit warring and ignoring an active discussion is. All I can really see is this so lets give the dude a bit more slack until he figures out our shit... If he continues to revert without discussing his edits then it's ban time. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 01:15, Apr 6
Really? It seems to me that he's being a dick to everyone who has been trying to help him so far.                               Puppy's talk page01:35 06 Apr
I wonder where those IPs came from... OK. You win. 1 week. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 02:02, Apr 6
Maybe he didn't do the IP blitz. It seems the ATS thread and article could be a magnet for anti's, and maybe Red Skare is an innocent in this. He promised not to touch the page anymore, so taking him at his word may be the assumption of good faith in this case. I'm likely totally wrong, yet maybe we should keep turning the other cheek with this one, until we are sure that the cheek turned isn't inviting access. Aleister 2:10 6-4-'12
Remember to check the block log dude. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 05:06, Apr 5
You did revert edits on an article he had started with no reason, and then reverted it again. I've added his edit back in.                               Puppy's talk page09:28 31 Mar
I saw the comment on Mr ex777's page. All things considered, I won't ban the IP but next time will be different. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:43, March 31, 2012 (UTC)