UnNews talk:Article gets +21 votes on VFH

1. This belongs here. It's informative and well written, just not funny.
2. Other articles have surpassed 20 votes in the past.
3. I was the one who nommed that article. I deserve some recognition.
4. ????
5. Profit!

—Sir SysRq (talk) 03:25, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I shoe-horned you into the article, and I think its been a while since we got past a +20 score. Also, I think it might be a bit long for unSignpost, although I did filibuster a bit. How would I go about moving it.--Mnbvcxz 03:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Would it be the ultimate meta-occurence if this was nominated on VFH and received more than 21 votes? I propose: yes. IronLung 08:15, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I remember Why?:Am I a Power Ranger? getting +21 votes once, wich was considered very exceptional at the time. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Bring it on over here. —Sir SysRq (talk) 16:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Modus doesn't have a problem a problem with the article, its more of an exhortation to vote than a vanity article. It's much better than Modus is the worst. --Mnbvcxz 16:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I didn't say there was any real problem with it, I just felt that UnSignpost was a better venue for it, since it's an informative part of Uncyc history rather than satire. Now, if this were, say, "Modus' first feature ever on Uncyc gets 2+ votes" then I could see it being UnNews. But that's just my opinion; if Modus feels otherwise, then he is wrong. —Sir SysRq (talk) 19:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC)