UnNews:UK Government gives itself power to ban the internet for thinking bad thoughts. Uncyclopedia likely to be high on hitlist

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(2 archived)
m (Reverted edit(s) of Rotlink (talk) to last version by MadMax)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
|author=Charles Arthur
 
|author=Charles Arthur
 
|pub=guardian.co.uk
 
|pub=guardian.co.uk
|date=April 08, 2010 |archiveurl=http://archive.is/20120804/http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/apr/08/digital-economy-bill-passes-third-reading |archivedate=2012-08-04}}
+
|date=April 08, 2010}}
   
 
*{{source|url=http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-04/07/digital-economy-bill-debate-ignored-by-95-percent-of-mps.aspx
 
*{{source|url=http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-04/07/digital-economy-bill-debate-ignored-by-95-percent-of-mps.aspx
Line 35: Line 35:
 
|author=Katie Scott
 
|author=Katie Scott
 
|pub=Wired
 
|pub=Wired
|date=April 07, 2010 |archiveurl=http://archive.is/20120917/http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-04/07/digital-economy-bill-debate-ignored-by-95-percent-of-mps.aspx |archivedate=2012-09-17}}
+
|date=April 07, 2010}}
   
 
[[Category:Politics of the United Kingdom]]
 
[[Category:Politics of the United Kingdom]]

Revision as of 05:20, September 17, 2012

This article is part of UnNews UnNews Logo Potato1 Your source for up-to-the-microsecond misinformation.

8 April 2010

Future-100px

Artist's impression of the bill

LONDON, England -- In a move described as "refreshingly progressive" by the government of China, the UK government last night passed a bill giving it the power to block any site on the interweb if they thought that site might, at some point in the future, possibly used for copyright infringement in some way.

As befits a bill that contained a clause conferring such power on the government, it was heard by a select number of only the finest minds - a handful of MPs, three cleaners who had thought the room was empty, and several mice gorging on the pie crumbs under John Prescott's seat.

The clause in question gives the government the power to block any website that it believes "has in the past, is currently, might in the future, or would possibly infringe copyright in any way, look at us funny, or spill our pints". The bill has been criticised by disciples of Joe Stalin as "not dictatorial enough", and "a poor second prize behind banning the whole wretched interweb".

Darthmandy

Lord Mandelson: a man you can trust

Of course, such wide-ranging powers must only be used responsibly, and as such can't be entrusted to anyone beholden to the whims of anything as dangerous as the public, which is why the responsibility has been passed to the office of the Secretary of State for Business, Peter Mandelson - who is safely unelected, and so can be guaranteed to make the right decisions without having to consider unimportant concepts such as "public opinion", or "public interest".

High on the list of sites likely to be affected by the bill are illegal file-sharing networks, leaked government information site Wikileaks, copyright minefields YouTube and Wikipedia, and of course, the embodiment of pernicious copyright flouting evil, Uncyclopedia. Fortunately, the new bill has to go through a "washing-up" process before the powers are formally ratified, meaning we should have some time left to ridicule the government one last time before they shut us do













Sources

Personal tools
projects