UnNews:Drone Wars: “If it breathes, kill it!”

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
This article is part of UnNews UnNews Logo Potato1 UnFair and UnBalanced

9 May 2010

Camel-shot

”If it breathes, kill it!”

WASHINGTON D.C. -- Once upon a time, the CIA had to know a target's name before putting him/her/it up for a robotic-targeted killing. Now, if it breathes, is good reason to call in a drone strike.

It's another sign of that a once-limited, once-covert program to assassinate senior terrorist leaders has morphed into a full-scale -- if undeclared -- war on Pakistan. And in a war, you don't need to know the name of someone on the other side before you take a shot.

Across the border, in Afghanistan, the rules for launching air strikes have become tighter than a balled fist. Dropping a bomb from above a few meters is now a tactic of last resort; especially when U.S. troops are under fire, commanders are reluctant to authorize air strikes, because of their deadly notorious inaccuracy.

In Pakistan, however, the opposite has happened. Starting in the latter days of the Bush administration, and vastly accelerating under the Obama presidency, drone pilots, who now number thousands of battle-hardened gamers, have become more and more free to launch their weapons. Now it’s an undeclared free-for-all “Drone War.”

"You've had an expanded target set for [some] time now and, given the danger Pakistanis pose and their relative inaccessibility, these kinds of strikes -- precise and effective -- have become like the cannon fire of this war. They're no longer extraordinary or even unusual," one American official tells CNN.

This official -- like many other officials -- insists that the drone strikes have torn up the ranks of militants, and devastated schools, marriage parties, and entire villages.

"The enemy has lost not just operational leaders and facilitators -- people whose names we know -- but formations of fighters, camels, mountain goats, and other terrorists," the official tells the Los Angeles Times. "We might not always have their names, but ... these are people or animals whose being alive have made it obvious that they are a threat. Now our orders are, 'if it breathes, kill it!'"

National security law experts, inside the government and out, are in the middle of an intense debate over whether the remotely piloted attacks are legal. One leading law professor told Congress last week that the drone operators could be tried for "war crimes," and hung in public.

The State Department's top lawyer counters that the drone attacks are a legitimate act of cold-blooded murder.

The connection between the robotic strikes over there and our safety here appears to be growing, The Pakistani Taliban, who have claimed credit for the botched Times Square bombing, say the car bomb was in retaliation for drone strikes.

But the robotic aircraft are only one component in the war in Pakistan. American troops are on the ground there, and getting into firefights. American contractors are operating a fleet of helicopters above. Higher in the sky are the American drones, flown by the U.S. Air Force and the CIA, and tactical nukes are sitting on the war table.

edit Sources

  • The Russian Government
  • The twisted imagination of a random geek at a computer terminal in Ukraine
Personal tools
projects