UnBooks talk:No Clean Way to Die
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Why is this part of UnNews?
Did you spell "prequel" wrong on purpose? just thought I'd let you know it's not right. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon 
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
This is rather good. Very poignant. I'm glad I'm not a bar of soap. -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC) When it comes to spelling, I am indeed retarted, yet thanks for calling it good. Yea, I just looked at my soap one day and thought, man what a hard life these guys have gotta have.Spatz 21:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
edit From Pee Review
edit UnBooks:No Clean Way to Die
I have not even halfway finished this. I plan to add ALOT more. This is just the basic storyline. What do you think of it so far???? Spatz 18:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 9.9999 | fuckin hilarious |
| Concept: | 9.9999 | cool |
| Prose and formatting: | 9.9999 | nice form |
| Images: | 9.9999 | v.g. |
| Miscellaneous: | 9.9999 | Miscellaneous comment |
| Final Score: | 49.9995 | Funny....but whats alot? |
| Reviewer: | — H. Peebles - D - HS    20:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
| |
| Humour: | 4 | Well, I've seen worse. You did the best you could with the concept. |
| Concept: | 2 | Unfortunately, the concept sucked. How old are you? If the answer is 12 or lower, I forgive you. It looks like a piece of sixth grade anthropomorphism with some lame dirty jokes thrown in. |
| Prose and formatting: | 6 | Readable. I couldn't quite steel myself to go through it carefully, but there weren't any glaring errors, and it flowed okay. |
| Images: | 4 | Not bad, not good. |
| Miscellaneous: | 4 | Meh |
| Final Score: | 20 | Basically, not a good article. Earlier, I rhetorically asked if you were 12; I've since checked your user page and I see you're 15. If this is the case, then this work is beneath you. Try harder next time. |
| Reviewer: | --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | |
