UnBooks:Vote for Featured UnBook/archive 1

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

UnBooks:The Digital Divide

Score: +3
  1. Symbol for vote nom + forSir Sycamore (talk) 11:49, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
    Did you read the big, bold text at the top of the page? Alternately, did I read it wrong? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:52, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
    What Modus said, but with "did I write it wrong?" I did have my eye on it for Jan's feature anyway, so give me a nudge on the 1st or thereabouts if I forget to change it. --UU - natter UU Manhole 12:16, Dec 30
    I did read it, but it sounded too much like an excuse not to feature stuff collectivly anymore - dive in there I say!:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 12:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
    Hey, I'm all for featuring collectively, but there have been no votes on this page for about a year now. That's serious stagnation. If we start getting more users again, and enough people show an interest in voting on millions of different pages again, this and other votes could be revived, but for now, I'm treating it kind of like the UnNews section on the Main Page. Most decent UnBooks will get a Main Page feature anyway. --UU - natter UU Manhole 12:24, Dec 30
    Are you a UUcan or a UUcan't?;) - If we don't get it together, no one is going to do it for us. We start acting like an improving site that works you never know, we might falsely convince ourselves into thinking it is or something along those lines:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 12:37, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
    Sometimes I think I'm more of a cUUnt... --UU - natter UU Manhole 16:38, Dec 30
  2. For Probably invalid, and late, but what the heck. If we stop acting like we are in decline, we might actually pick up a bit. --Mnbvcxz 20:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  3. Heck yeh. If they get to vote I want to do it too! Sure, that specific book has already been featured but I'm just stating my active interest in getting this voting section back on its feet. I'll be sure to notify you (UU and Orion) if I stumble on any great UnBooks. Cheers --Kit talk 15:49 26 February 22px-Flag of Sweden

UnBooks:A UTP: Link Gets Pregnant and Dies

Score: -1
  1. Symbol for vote self-Nom + for Symbol against vote self-nom & Against vote is probably invalid for several reasons, and the unBook is an unfunny one-trick image-whore. But, why not.--Mnbvcxz 20:17, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Is no one going to vote down this crap!?!? --Mnbvcxz 05:55, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
See the comments on the other "vote" on this page, and the large bold text at the top of the page - we don't vote on UnBooks features at the moment, haven't for over a year, precisely because no-one has voted on this page for ages. If you have a good suggestion for next month's feature, let me or Orian know. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:14, Jan 20
Fine, this I'll vote it down myself. --Mnbvcxz 18:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
But on a more serious note, do you think voting would pick up again if you restarted it? --Mnbvcxz 18:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

UnBooks:Tropic of Cancer

Votes for: 2

UnBooks:The Castaway

Score: +1 Man-Volleyball relationships

SNF. Seriously, I need to get some restraint... P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:56, Sep 11, 2007

Online Piracy And You

Score: +1 Very Rant-Like On The Subject Of Online Piracy

Self-Nom and For Of Course This Book Is Awesome Even If I Did Write It User:Box1ng Bear/sig

Strong Against Obviously taken from "Is Your Son a Computer Hacker?", which done it funnier. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 17:35, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

UnBooks:Dane Cook: An Unauthorized Autobiography, 2nd Edition (New Pictures)

Score: +1 bad comedians

UnBooks:Who Killed God?

Score: +1 murderers of God

Gallows Humor

Score: +2 delivered

Agent U

Score: 0

Oscar Wilde's Complete Guide To Happyland

Score: +1
  • For Good effort put it over much time, I think its finally ready for a nomination--aldreneo 04:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

UnBooks:The Tale of Captain Petey Widdershanks Blunderbub Shaleweather Monkeyturtle Johansen III, Buccaneer Extraordinaire

Score: +4
  • I categorically deny that. It wasn't even an inspiration at the time, although that is one of my favorite articles ever. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 17:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  • For Argh! --The UnIdiot 18:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Yarrrg! f0r. Teh Rote 23:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

UnBooks:Ill Met By Moonlight

Score: +1

Previously Featured

UnBooks:Choose Your Own Adventure

Featured Ergust, er, I mean, August 2007 cos it rules. -- Hindleyite Converse 10:58, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Score: +6

UnBooks:American History!

Score: +6

&Yes, please --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


UnBooks:Rigism

Featured May 2007. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

Score: +7
  • For Rigism forever! --ZombieJeff 18:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
  • For YOU'RE WINNER! THRILLHO 18:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
  • For BIG RIGS: OVER THE ROAD RACING Chole! 23:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Against Big Rigs is funny, but this is just overly long and most of the material within is copied from elsewhere. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • For I am a proud Rigist --GAMESPOT=666 03:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  • For I wrote most of it Cirus 03:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  • For A WINNER IS YOU! Monstro_Man 01:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  • For YOU'RE WINNER! DZ987 04:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  • For YOU"RE WINNER! Correnthos 13:30 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  • For Why not, the book is just so good and life changing --Final Starman 22:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  • For Rigism could preserver the Paraguayan way of life! --160.36.78.161 03:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Against Appears to be just random inside jokes for the game. I did not get little to any of them; and thats just what most of the article is...Hardly an UnBook if you ask me, I doubt any of these votes are truth but more fanboy..--aldreneo 04:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment O LAWD, featured --ZombieJeff 23:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Comment You guys know that I'm not going to be taking any of these votes in. If you really can't work out why then *shrug* —Braydie 15:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment I knew this sort of bullshit would happen. I can't believe it. 67.162.16.232 02:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment I've been contributing Uncyclopedia for months, mine at least is legit. Same with ZombieJeff. GAMESPOT=666 23:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment both of your votes are fine because you two are established members. I'm just afraid that most of these are random fanboy votes. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Comment I don't mean to start anything, I really don't, but having the most votes should make us UnBook of the month, right? Most of the votes are from "established members", if that means people who have registered. I really don't see the problem. Unless it's a personal problem and you just don't want us to be the book of the month…--ZombieJeff 01:55, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Comment You know that your gay right? If you really can't work out why then *shrug*, also cocks--Final Starman 23:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment Star, we can work through this without that kind of behavior. --ZombieJeff 23:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  • For --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Although Sannse already checked most of these guys for sockpuppetry, I still suspect that some website... Oh, say the Rigism group on Gamespot, told everyone on it to vote for this. This is really a crap article, and basically a collage of copied material. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Are you kidding? Gamespot is only for LOSERs. These are just true Rigists from all over the world voting for one of the greatest publications of our time: The Book of Rigism. None of it is copied. 67.162.16.232 22:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment GameSpot? Ha, we would never go on GameSpot. --ZombieJeff 00:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment A crap article you say... *facepalm* --THRILLHO 14:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Against It's just a pseudo-mythological heap of perplexing forumcruft. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 17:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Against loaded votes. The page isn't all that great either. Also, my soup has gone cold. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • For Wikipedia's already being uptight and the users are deleting any references made to Rigism because it's "all a joke", I hope to god the Uncyclopieda users aren't going the same way. Besides, since when was uncyclopedia supposed to be taken seriously?--85.211.249.49 15:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

UnBooks:The n00b Survival Guide

Featured April 2007. The Rigism situation is still being resolved so for now the n00b survival guide will be April's feature. -- Hindleyite Converse 14:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Score: +4

UnBooks:Practical Lessons on Communism

March —Braydie 20:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Score: +5
  • Self-Nom and For. Because Squiggle can. -- herr doktor needsAcharge Rocket [scream!] 00:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • For This'l get featured on the main page. —Braydie 00:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • F☭R, SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 03:56, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • For the win. Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 18:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • FOR THE REVOLUTION! great stuff. --HaigesigaigeJobu, Icons-flag-ee 13:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

UnBooks:An Uncyclopedian's Guide to American Politics

Featured in Feb. —Braydie at 15:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Score: +3
  • Nom and For I monitored this article's creation quite closely and frankly, it's good. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Absolutely. I like this one. A lot...call me. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Belated For - Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 12:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

UnBooks:Parkhurst Pete's World of Wonders

First feature of 2007. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:35, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Score: +5 Wonder Worlds of Parkhurst Pete
Personal tools
projects