# Uncyclopedia:Past Winners

(Redirected from UN:WIN)
20052006 (part 1)2006 (part 2)2007 (part 1)2007 (part 2)2008 (part 1)2008 (part 2)2009 (part 1)2009 (part 2)2010 (part 1)2010 (part 2)2011 (part 1) 2011 (part 2) 2012 (part 1) 2012 (part 2) 2013 2014

Behold the wonder of these hallowed halls. Weinners. All. The Writer of the Month Award!!!!! Behold!!! Yes!!! This. This it it!!

# Writer of the Month

## March 2005

Stillwaters won. Yay for him her. Pieclone died I think.

Voting Breakdown:

### stillwaters

Nominated by --Nytrospawn 14:16, 16 Mar 2005 (EST)

A vote --User:Abc

I vote myself to break this smelly stalemate. --stillwaters/Talk 15:20, 23 Mar 2005 (EST)

Vote Not because I love his her work, but because I like stalemates. --TheTris 03:57, 29 Mar 2005 (EST)

Voat Because I love breaking stalemates. And stillwaters is my father daughter. --JHarr 17:09, 30 Mar 2005 (EST)

Veto ... I mean Vote! --RadicalX 10:45, 31 Mar 2005 (EST)

### pieclone

Nominated by --Savethemooses 16:12, 16 Mar 2005 (EST)

vote - hard choice though, took months if not years of thought --Paulgb 22:13, 18 Mar 2005 (EST)

vote - Damn your impudence man. I shall meet you at the back of St Swithin's Church at 4pm - you may choose anyone as a second barring an Irishman or a Mohametan! Put your affairs in order and prepare your family for the worst news! --Pieclone 07:17, 25 Mar 2005 (EST)

vote - Beware, I believe the swine is in fact left handed. --Gadgeophile 03:15, 29 Mar 2005 (EST)

vote Not much to seperate the two candidates, my personal preference lies here though. --Lomedae 10:51, 31 Mar 2005 (EST)

## April 2005

Voting Breakdown:

I SAID SO

## May 2005

This writer came on strong in May, with instant classics such as The Manhattan Project and St. Peter's Basilica. Radical also contributed several great images, 3 of which have been featured on the front page. Radical narrowly beat out Savethemooses, who is widely considered to be the funniest person on earth. Look forward to great things from both writers in the coming months.

Voting Breakdown:

### User:Savethemooses

Nomination --Paulgb Talk 18:43, 11 May 2005 (EDT)

I second that, matey --Savethemooses 19:16, 11 May 2005 (EDT)

You rock, Stm. --RadicalX 23:22, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

(Edward G. Robinson Voice) Since you rat bastards aren't gonna pick the noob see...I'll nominate him here..see? myah myah. But he's been featured, see, for an article and an image, see, and his images are the best...myah myah--slack 15:00, 21 May 2005 (EDT)

Make that two articles and two images this month...but who's counting? I second the vote for me...=P --RadicalX 23:04, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Oh, and I suppose that you plan on getting me to vote for you, RadicalX. Well it's not going to work... Damn! --Savethemooses 08:02, 25 May 2005 (EDT)

Both of you guys are fantastic writers, but I gotta go with RadicalX here. I don't think anyone has make me snigger more in the past month. --Rcmurphy 18:09, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I have only written 2 articles this month, so Radical's award is well-deserved. However, you can still vote based on some earlier articles. Wink wink. --Savethemooses 19:29, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Wow...beating out the funniest man on Earth....I never thunk it possible! Thanks for the terrific honor...I don't know if I deserve it, but I'll at least try to live up to the name! Gotta start work on some more articles.....--RadicalX 04:35, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

## June 2005

LeeHarveyKennedy, the result of an unfortunate cloning experiment, won the June award by paying off himself so that he'd vote for himself. He still owes himself \$100. He hast written many good things, unlike slack, who has written many good things -1. Boo hoo for him.

Voting Breakdown:

### slack

1. --RadicalX 16:10, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC) - slack has been very prolific lately, and produced gems such as "The Oldest Trick in the Book" and more. He's gonna be huge this month. He told me so. =P
2. Although he's suffering from writers' block, he IS ruggedly handsome and a fabulous tenor--slack 19:15, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. Hmmm, I bet he's an animal in the sack --Nytrospawn 19:55, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

### LeeHarveyKennedy

1. --astadt 02:42, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) Quality and Quantity
2. --Rcmurphy 16:30, 29 Jun 2005 (UTC) I concur with Mr. astadt.
3. --LeeHarveyKennedy 23:45, 29 Jun 2005 (UTC) I also agree with these two fine gentlemen, but I'm impulsive like that.
Dang it man. You just wanted to gum up the works with another deadlock. I know your game. --Rcmurphy 03:42, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Sorry, but I'm just trying to make sure that everything's fair. After all, my first vote went to Pat Buchanan. -- LeeHarveyKennedy 18:56, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. --PantsMacKenzie 12:55, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC) You guys are both good... I flipped a coin. >.>

Someone else want to do the Writer of the Month honors this month? Also, I think that the articles linked in the template should be changed once in a while. You know, to avoid that stale feeling. If we unprotected the template, LeeHarvey could do it himself. I think he's old enough to handle it. --Rcmurphy 03:10, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)
That sounds like a plan... Unlock the template and let LeeHarvey do it himself... (I'm lazy. Can you tell? ^_^ ) --PantsMacKenzie 03:16, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Okay, the template's been changed. Only a day late, too. LeeHarvey, you can edit the template if you want to change the articles that are featured, or if you want to...do something else. I don't know. The power...is yours! --Captain Planet 04:30, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Today. . . I consider myself. . . The luckiest man. . . On the face of the earth! Or the internet, at least. I promise to not leave myself out in the sun and go stale and start to smell bad. Oh, and maybe I'll write some more things, too. --Lee 21:57, 4 Jul 2005 (UTC)

## July 2005

All I know is that carlb kicked KP's arse. Bigtime. I'm sure KP is a good writer, but quit frankly I have no idea who he is. Anyway, carlb's victory is further proof that capitalism will never work in this country.

Voting Breakdown:

### KP

1. --Elvis 10:05, 20 Jul 2005 (UTC) for the maddness that is Major League Bloodbath and it's many, many associated pages.

### carlb

--astadt 15:21, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC) My nomination won last month, so eat dirt KP! But seriously, check out CarlB's impressive list of articles.

--ERTW 20:12, 29 Jul 2005 (UTC) I cast my vote in carlb's general direction

--Lee 00:45, 30 Jul 2005 (UTC) Prolific, proficient and professional. I gotta tip my hat to this guy.

--Hooloovoo 13:53, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC) A cool frood who knows where his towel is.

- Guest 15:26, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC). Unstoppable, as someone else said.

## August 2005

After some list minute Tie Breaking Famine emerged Victoriouse

Voting Breakdown:

### Feast

• Sure there is no such User as Feast. But we all deserve a choice, don’t we? --KP 05:56, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)

### Famine

• I nominate Famine for his recent proliferation of Oscar Wildizms and the associated templates. -ERTW 03:48, 3 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• I nominate Famine, because nepotism is great. --TheTris 15:59, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• I damn confused. What the hell? Nominated for writer of the month? Apparently you missed the fact that I don't actually add content to this website. I just delete stuff. And I already got that award. Well, I sometimes add content, but it usually sucks until someone else fixes it. But hey, I like awards, so I'm voting for myself. Twice. --Famine 20:13, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• And if I pitch in at this point, I reckon that just about seals it for the hungry guy -- Codeine 12:19, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Ah, crap! A minor disappointment, and I'm all out of Scotch. Well done, Famine --Cap'n Ben CUN 12:22, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Ben - I've got yer back next time. I think I just hit the highest rung I can reach on the ladder here. 18:10, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Well Jesus, was nobody going to tell me? I totally missed this until I was investigating Rcmurphy's changes to the front page. Luckily he made them in the section with my name in it. W00t! I got WOTM even with a negative amount of content addition to Uncyclopedia.

On behalf of all my supporters, I extend my gratitude and third leg. Titles do that to me. To [[User:Cap'n Ben|everyone else]:

Kids, you can get big like me. Follow your dreams. You can meet your goals. I am living proof. 18:02, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

### Cap'n Ben

• Might I be third time lucky? Look at this bloke's list of contributions! --astadt 00:49, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• A month ago, I wouldn't even have thought of voting for myself, but now there's a knighthood in it for me. I vote me! --Cap'n Ben CUN 06:57, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• Seconded... er I mean thirded...ed. --Freebasser 12:59, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)

### Joe Mama

I nominate Joe Mama because...Do I have to have a reason?--Alfred 11:28, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Sweet Jesus, Mary and Joseph. That's an article, Alfred. Not a user. I don't mean to be unkind, but you're not the sharpest tool in the box, are you, dear? -- Codeine 12:23, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Anthromorphization of articles into people never hurt nobody. Besides, some articles literally write themselves. Taking both of these into account, the award should be valid for such articles. (Ok, the preceeding was satire, plus it is 5 in the morning and I just won some award, and call me sir! *giggle*) --Splaka 12:30, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

## September 2005

User:Cap'n Ben does it!!

Voting Breakdown:

### Cap'n Ben

• For his sterling edits, and positive attitude. One vote. He'd have gotten two from me if he had remembered the scotch. 18:57, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• Gosh, yes. I'd have voted for him last month if Famine hadn't threatened to kill my family. -- Codeine OUN Bur. 11:48, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
For the record, I did not threaten to kill your family. I merely promised that they would be safe if I were voted for. The lack of unsafeness for your family was a creation of your own mind, as you considered not voting for me. If anyone makes any threat against your family, I will look into it personally. I would do anything for someone who supports me as much as you do. Do you understand what I'm saying? 01:17, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Yes Sir. I'm sorry Sir, I didn't mean to besmirch you. Now can my daughter please have her insulin back? -- -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:23, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• I reluctantly acept this glamorous, highly paid position. --Cap'n Ben CUN 14:24, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• Yarr -- ERTW MUN 23:23, 20 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• One vote for Cap'n Ben! Time to sacrifice goats and virgins in his name! --KP CUN 04:40, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• Only if he votes for me next time. --Savethemooses 22:22, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

### Paul Hentea

for his article on Romanian people. and he's only 16. 16 year-old counter strike addicts deserve at least one gallon of ice-cream --Mama Leone 17:41, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)

### User:David Gerard

I nominate myself, because X Window System attained the Front Page a mere FOUR DAYS after its creation. (With only slight shilling on my LiveJournal.) That's my third feature. And I do Special:Newpages and go only slightly insane from shooting all the crap. VOTE ME FOR A POT IN EVERY CHICKEN! - David Gerard 03:14, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Geez, read the rules, noob. But what the hay. Just for kicks, I'll nominate you. (And I haven't even read the article!)--—rc (t) 03:29, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)
You wouldn't believe how drunk I was last night five hours ago when I got home and saw it had been front-paged. It's 9am now and the sun's up and the cat's wanting food and oh Ghod my head. But I r still t3h l44t. (That's 11 more 'leet than l33t.) - David Gerard 07:55, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I vote for you, because you nominated one of my articles for the front page, and I am shameless suck-up. Incidentally, you can still vote for that article --Tinned Stoat 16:26, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

### Rangeley

• I nominate Rangeley, because of his excellent linking skills. He has written all of the Soviet Premier articles, as well as a nice job on The Presidential Battle Royale of 1975. And best yet, all of his articles fit together somehow and create a ncie sense of continuity.

Runiteshark 03:14, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• Thanks! I do try to keep my articles together in one timeline, as continuity is always fun. My favorite one I made recently is Von Bobby John, though. Rangeley 19:01, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• I am backing up the nomination because of his excellent work on the Soviet Premier articles.

Raistlin7000 03:00, 29 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• Its fun working with him on the german articles! He certainly does a good job. Kikimora 19:14, 29 Sep 2005 (UTC)

### Charles Dickens

because he's one cool mormonfarker.--Alfred 00:50, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

## October 2005

Rangeley wins. I have nothing else to say.

### Rangeley

Rangeley (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

I nominate Rangeley for again, linking together so many of Uncyclopedia's articles. He has done so much, not much of the Presidental royale, and all that timeline, but is even working on the German timeline. This guy has talent. Runiteshark 19:03, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

• Thanks again! Rangeley
• I vote for Rangeley. Raistlin7000 01:56, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• I vote for Rangeley. --D. Darko 14:33, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• I vote for le Rangeley. Runiteshark 22:24, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• For --Insertwackynamehere | Talk 20:50, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Half vote --Paulgb Talk 21:54, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Full Vote!!! Kikimora 18:51, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Eighth Vote--Spintherism 23:32, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Eighth Vote--Spintherism 23:32, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Eighth Vote--Spintherism 23:32, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Eighth Vote--Spintherism 23:32, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)

HOLD ON! Look what I happened to find in Recent Changes: Rangeley blanks the Village Dump. With this evidence, why on earth would you want to vote Rangeley for WotM? Now, has Rcmurphy ever blanked the VD? No, he has not...

I wish I could blank my VD... --Savethemooses 13:11, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
You're right; Rcmurphy hasn't been nearly rambunctious enough. Voting FOR Rangeley. --Algorithm 00:08, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• I vote for Rangely and so do all my friends and relatives. 58 votes -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 01:41, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

### Rcmurphy

Rcmurphy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

• Because Rangeley needs some competition --Savethemooses 22:15, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Union of Uncyclopedians, Wikipedians and allied trades, 2.5 Million Votes --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 09:44, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC) </labour party block vote>
• Half vote --Paulgb Talk 21:54, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• --I was going to vote him for Writer of the Most Recent Thirty-Two Day Period, but this'll suffice. --EvilZak 01:17, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• For Hey murph, you scratch my back, Ill scratch yours. *coughBruceVFHcough* Jack Cain 18:32, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Fourth Vote--Spintherism 23:32, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Fourth Vote--Spintherism 23:32, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Eighth Vote--Spintherism 02:44, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• I like the cut of his jib--Mhaille 00:12, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

## November 2005

Despite the Rangeley official fan club making a bid for their hero to retain his title, KP claimed the recognition he rightly deserved.

### Rangeley (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

• I nominate Rangeley for writer of the month because of his amazing contributions to Uncyclopedia, with his leet writamability skills. Look it up, it's a real word *makes it a real word in undictionary* (not sure if that is real).

Raistlin7000 04:58, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

* Support (1.) Fact-based is funnier, (2.) Politicians make great cannon fodder, and (3.) Bonus points for running gags on Tom Cruise and razor gauntlets. Some competition wouldn't hurt though, seeing as this would be a repeat win. -- T. (talk) 10:56, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC) Withdrawn. :) See below. -- T. (talk) 16:20, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• For Rangeley, he has written some good stuff. Kikimora 20:12, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Rangeley aside from myself were one of the only people who populated the Czech republic. Needless to say, he has done many other things. I can't even begin to mention how many things he has added to this site, and it continues to grow, both in humor and quantity. Runiteshark 03:30, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

### KP (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

• Nominate and vote. KP has been a major contributor for many moons. This month him and Rangeley have done excellent (although sometimes in disagreement) work on the Colonizations. --Splaka 11:06, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Thirded. While a latecomer to this horserace, KP is more than worthy of the award, and it's better to pass the award to a different winner this month if possible. -- T. (talk) 16:20, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For. Didn't Rangely win it already? Either way, KP he make me laugh long time. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 16:40, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Well, if we can't repeat winners, I vote for this inanimate carbon rod. No wait, I vote for KP, because he wrote a bunch of great featured articles. For --Isra1337 00:01, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
We can have repeat winners but it's obviously harder to win twice!--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 10:28, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Vote for KP, coz he's NUTS. Nuts, hahahahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahaha..... --
• For for KP hands down, coz it's his time. --Ogopogo 06:12, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• KP has definately contributed a lot of funny material to Uncyclopedia over his tenure here, and it is worthy of recognition. ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 05:04, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Wow, someone making more nonsense than me...I loved Quantum Economics being an Econ teacher soooo....Votey!--slack 07:04, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

## December 2005

Savethemooses won despite no competition.

### Savethemooses (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

A consistently hilarious, if horrendously egostistical individual, and I find it hard to believe he hasn't won this already. Nominated (albeit a little prematurely) for December, as KP pretty much has this month in the bag, and it wouldn't really be fair to either of them to enter him for November at this late stage. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 01:23, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Thank you tiny worthless peasant. I will keep you around when I take over the internet. 103% Accepted plus one full vote. --Savethemooses 01:26, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For. I can think of a couple of people who deserve it more, but no one who wants it more, and that's got to count for something. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:09, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For It's his time to shine. I stole it from him in May..hehe Strong RadX 21:45, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• FORE! He's ummm, okay, if you like that sort of thing, and if you DO like that sort of thing, this is the sort of the thing you would like.--Sir Slackerboya CUN VFH (talk) 00:37, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• √16 Seriously. See his user page. ---- 03:12, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Four, the only reason I didn't nominate him is because I assumed he'd already won, him being the helpful happy chap he is. (vote from Lugiatm per this edit -- T. (talk) 19:29, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC) )
• For He's teh funnee! ROFLMFAO. -- T. (talk) 12:41, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For. He deseves it because Pot v. Kettle rules. -- 22:25, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• As Moose Fan of the Month, I feel that I am obligated to vote For. KATIE!! 05:57, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For I'm liking his work, particularly his new one, Winslet fatalism... I probably have that too. Jlove1982 06:41, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Foppet it's a mix between a vote for and a vote puppet -- 12:36, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

### Isra1337 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Because Stm needs some competition, and Isra1337 has written some good stuff. A nomination, but I'm not voting for anyone quite yet. --—rc (t) 03:27, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

# Noob of the Month

## March 2005

### Chrono-something or other

--Nytrospawn 14:11, 16 Mar 2005 (EST)

Agree He has written something almost funny too and he's a real n00b. --MZL 15:49, 19 Mar 2005 (EST)

Against I don't like the quality of his writing. He is rather n00b though. --Chronarion 01:18, 22 Mar 2005 (EST)

## April 2005

Not just because he's my little brother, but I really like the St. Peter's Basilica (which got alot of traffic when JPII kicked) and The Manhattan Project also maybe he'll nominate me....--slack 15:20, 17 Apr 2005 (EDT)

He's got my vote. I love The Manhattan Project. Oh wait, it's the wrong month. Still, it's a vote. --madmerse 10:51, 2 July 2005 (EDT)

### Slackerboy

Check out his work, especially Gibberish, Coconuts, and FUCKTARDS. Brilliant stuff. --RadicalX 17:30, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Woo Hoo rooty tooty toot on my own horn!, Now Raddy vote for your own to tie it up!--slack 17:15, 1 May 2005 (EDT)

## May 2005

### Mellomeh

See Missing milk for a bit of a larf *thumbs up* --Freebasser 00:04, 12 May 2005 (EDT)

I concur. Mellomeh is probably the funniest person ever to have written an article. He will fulfil his ambition of being a journalist when he's older. I would go so far as to say I love Mellomeh. --Mellomeh 18:32, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes its true

## August 2005

### User:Splaka

Splaka (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) I hesitate to refer to him as a n00b, but can you believe this guy's only been here since August 18th?! Over 1000 edits already, relentless work for QVFD and Ban Patrol, great templates... the list goes on. -- Codeine 18:34, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
I second that motion, this will be his restitution for spelling his name wrong --Nytrospawn 18:56, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Oh crap, my secret is out! I was here for a day or two before that, honest. *humble n00b* --Splaka 21:30, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I seventh that vote for Sprlaka. Or Srplaka. Or Splraka. Or whever that r was supposed to go. --Famine 23:30, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I X'th that nomination where X = the number of existing nominations --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 23:53, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Um, you do realize that if I third it, you also third it, no? Do you want to bid on an (X+1)th nomination instead? --Famine 23:55, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Not once my nomination exists.....or something </hiding blushes>--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 00:43, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete - Oh , wait, not that kind of vote. Is there any doubt that Spläka is the worthiest of all noobs? Yes on Propostion S. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:37, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Burniate I agree with MM ^. Page is completely without merit, and seems to have been written by a drunk 14 year old with only 3 fingers. --Famine 20:57, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Damn, I'd fire my biographer, but I feel sorry for him, being an underage alcoholic who uses buzz saw blades for frisbees. -S

### User:Ogopogo

Ogopogo (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

--Marcos_Malo S7fc BOotS | Talk 23:35, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC) He's been working tirelessly to improve the humoristical quality of Unc.

### Noob Saibot

Reason: He is the Ultimate Kombatant. Plus he's really cheap too. -Hyad 04:43, 3 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I'd like for someone to nominate me, because I can't nominate myself.--Alfred 11:51, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Sorry Alfred, we don't have a "Dingleberry of the Month" category. Rest assured that when we do, you'll be the first nomination. -- Codeine
Perhaps we need a Perma-n00b award, for people like Alfred who have no hope in ever figuring it out. --Famine 16:00, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

## August 2005

A close run thing but User:UtarEmpire wins (despite having to huff all of his work due his bosses lacking a sense of humour)--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 00:16, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)

### User:Alfred

Alfred (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) Because he asked for it and hopefully this will be the boost to get him writting some good stuff.--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 18:48, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

But, he's been here too long to be a noob (nearly 2 months)...? Although I guess he's spent most of that time banned, and he could probably use the encouragement. He'll get my vote when he contributes a new article. Come on Alfie, wow me. -- Codeine OUN Bur. 13:34, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I vote for myself, and you should too.--Alfred 00:31, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

### User:UtarEmpire

UtarEmpire (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) For creating Category:Wheeling Jesuit University and just about everything in it!!!--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 19:14, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

### User:Dac1990

Dac1990 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) For World War II (video game) and Chocolate-covered black holes --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 09:35, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)

For. When I invented the weapon for the list I didn't expect the throwaway topic to become a full article! But reading it is making me kind of hungry oh no ! --Splaka 10:00, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)

For. Because I want to encourage another tie break. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:26, 21 Sep 2005 (UTC)

### User:Famine and User:Rcmurphy -> Special:Listadmins

Both for having no idea how a wiki works, or how to use the "advanced" editing features, despite being admins here for a minimum of 4.5 months. And for missing large swathes of the site, even though there are links in plain sight to those parts on many pages. And for not being able to read and follow directions. And for repeated edits to the same line or paragraph of text, because they are too ignorant/lazy to use the preview button effectively. 01:24, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• For There's a preview button? --Rcmurphy KUN 01:33, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• 7.0 PH: Ok, they may be deserving (but I was just joking guys, geez!), but they've been here too long, plus they nominated themselves. Plus I am snorting milk up my nose from giggling, which hurts! --Splaka 04:46, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Did you miss the "And for not being able to read and follow directions" part? In this case, I'd have to rule that self-nomination actually improves our position. 22:19, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Damn. Ok, I nominate my self again too, for sense-of-humor-failure! Bah, heh. --Splaka 22:54, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Hmm. I just found out that I have better editing skills than these two admins. And I'm not an admin. Heh. Heh heh heh. Although I can't do table or template formatting, and the two templates I made are simple allstubs things... oh well. That's what we have good HTML formatters here for, right? for--Cheeseboi 19:17, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• For I just realized I never voted for myself. And after making more repeated edits because "Save Page" and "Show Preview" start with the same letter, I think I deserve it. -- 22:01, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Note: Since there are two of us, each vote here counts twice. So we currently have six votes and are in the lead. --—rc (t) 22:36, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose unless I get to join in, in which case I change my vote to For. --EvilZak 22:18, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
There. --Splaka 23:35, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
No no no. According to your userpage you have FOUR featured articles. That means you're valuable to the wiki and can't be classed with me and Famino. --—rc (t) 00:44, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

For --—rc (t) 00:44, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I now Oppose Some of our Admins are not incompetent n00bs. I've seen single edits from many of them which don't contain errors, and aren't followed by multiple other edits changing single letters or correcting speeling. Also, some seem able to navigate around in a wiki, which I think should disqualify them. -- 01:27, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

For --—rc (t) 00:23, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

For Sure I'll vote for them, even though User:Famine banned me.--Alfred 00:38, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

## October 2005

BobBobBob wins a not-extremely-close race.

### User:BobBobBob

This is a bit pre-emptive, but I will be semi-gone for a week or so starting October 1st, so this is a nomination for Bob^3 for next month. For great writing like 9/11 (video game), heroism during the slashdotting earning him a burninator award, and not begging me to nominate him. --Splaka 22:10, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• I second my nomination, for whatever it's worth. Nothing like planning ahead, eh? You can view Splaka's talk page to verify that I did not beg. Well, not on the conscious level, at least. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 14:31, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• I nominate me for December 2235, I may have written something decent by then.--Tinned Stoat 16:29, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• I am for--Insertwackynamehere | Talk 00:20, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• ForForFor BobBobBob. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:32, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• .boBboBboB rof etov I --Clorox MUN 1:04, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• For $\mbox{Bob}^3$ --Insertwackynamehere | Talk 00:46, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• For BobBobBob Rangeley 16:44, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Five Congrats. --Savethemooses 22:11, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Aye! You're the best out of the two candidates. You get my vote! --Mhaille 17:47, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• A Vote for Bob^3 is a vote for SANITY. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 01:39, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

### User:Nerd42

For his sterling redirection work, keeping those lazy admins on their toes and out of trouble! --Spintherism 22:26, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

`"Always knew I'd be nominated for the n00b of the Month Award."`

`~ Nerd42 00:33, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC) on n00bs like himself`

that was a vote for myself by the way. --Nerd42 00:36, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

For --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 12:14, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

aw, shoot. I was nominated too late. Haven't a chance of winning now. Oh well, contrats Bob^3 --Nerd42 03:19, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Aye! You're the best out of the two candidates. You get my vote! --Mhaille 17:47, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

## November 2005

A one horse race. Hail Todd!

### Me

• For--Splaka
• Against Has made no worthwhile contributions. --—rc (t) 22:50, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

### Todd_Lyons (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

For basicaly spending his entire life here since finding us!--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:06, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I can't tell you how hard it is to keep looking at the word basicaly, but do nothing. I'm a fan, so I respect the Man—spelling as-is. Hail to the King.  :) -- T. (talk) 17:13, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
» Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 16:19, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
(P.S. Apparently the [itex] tag is broken.)
• For. --Ogopogo 20:27, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Whywhywhy's Vote is Invalid the vote was 2 confusing--Whywhywhy 08:03, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Where was the stooped man mealy-colored old man I used to call "FOR" when the merry go round broke down?"--Sir Flammable KUN 02:00, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

## December 2005

We had a genuine race this month, folks, but Whywhywhy came out on top because he garnered support late in the game. Because he garnered support late in the game. Because he garnered support late in the game.

### Claudius_Prime (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

• Nomination. One of the best new writers I've seen in a long time! They're not active in voting, yet, but their writing quality is excellent! » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 17:48, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

### Kevillips (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Nomination -- T. (talk) 11:45, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For I was pretty excited to be the first one nominated and I thought I'd be the first one to vote for myself. Generally speaking, to not vote for yourself is both an unselfish act and a stupid cowardly thing to do. It is generally assumed everyone will vote for themselves, therefore canceling one another's vote out. I hereby cast my vote for me to bring the playing field back to only letting others decide who wins. --k3vin 01:50, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC) User:Kevillips
```The More U Know
k3vin has a minor in political science so therefore knows nothing about the politics of voting and stuff.
```

### Suresh (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Nomination -- T. (talk) 04:29, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For -- 21:21, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For. Good edits, good writing. -- T. (talk) 12:30, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For: In my experience Suresh has both been a good contributor and an all around reasonable character, we could do with more n00bs like this. --Sir gwax (talk) 04:40, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For: In order to tie up with Kevillips and Whywhywhy. (Selfrighteous bastards!)--Suresh 14:18, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Against-- Not original enough, definitely funnier users. --The Pancake Man 22:01, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• ResignedReassured Well, It doesn't look as if I get most votes, but I hell sure got the best ones!--Suresh 14:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For in spite of his resignation. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 07:03, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For. --Ryoske 10:39, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For I like you. I also liek kevillips, but my bote's going that way too.-- Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 23:22, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

### Prettiestpretty (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Nomination - Lots of new/original material, all of it really funny stuff. --some other user 16:02, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For -- 21:21, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

### Sir_Cornbread (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Nomination-- Funny articles, made a lot in a short time. --The Pancake Man 03:13, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For-- I shalt also vote for myself, as I have far too big of an ego not to. --Sir Cornbread 20:47, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For-- I nominated him, so I'll give him my vote too. --The Pancake Man 01:17, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For-- This dude is pretty funny. --Fat People Suck 00:08, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Against. ~ For awarding himself awards (Better Than You and Her Majesty's Royal Flying Rat's Ass Medal), limited edits, and for mildly okay to mediocre material. I'm also a little skeptical of votes from users who have somehow read all your material and voted for you within 10 minutes of joining.  :) -- T. (talk) 01:25, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Comment-- Well I thought those awards were simply jokes, but I will remove them right now if that is not the case. Go check my profile now. And as for the quick vote by Fat People Suck, he is my friend, so he voted for me. I didnt vote for myself, except under my own name. --Sir Cornbread 01:47, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Against, per Todd's comments. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 12:53, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For, He made really good/funny edits on many pages. --BILLY! 23:14, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Comment ~ As a veteran of nearly 3 days, your opinion carries weight. I'm going to consider changing my vote. Thanks!  :) -- T. (talk) 23:22, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Comment ~ Even if I am a noob myself, I can still vote for noob of the month... --BILLY! 07:12, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• So Scandalous 23:52, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• yesyesyes. He already won it, I just wanted to show my support. officer designate Lugiatm 00:48, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

### Mummified_Stoat (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

• Nomination and vote -- There's stiff competition this month. As much as it pains me to choose, I think Stoat has the ideal blend of intelligent prose and insane inventiveness. YMMV. Even the fake articles on his user page made me snicker (though I think I've already read versions of them from other users). -- T. (talk) 15:58, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• I like the word stoat. He must be awesome and deserve it. Just kidding, I think I read one of his brain children. Maybe not. But I'll still vote for him. --KATIE!! 00:44, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC) I'm taking this one back, although I never really cast it, according to my bolding. KATIE!! 23:06, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• He's got my vote! That's for sure... --MoneySign 13:53, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Against. None of it is really all that funny...--The Pancake Man 04:46, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

### Whywhywhy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

• Nomination and For. Because he's my favorite and next month he won't be a noob anymore. Plus he's contributed a bunch and does our bidding. Whywhy for life! or something. KATIE!! 03:58, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Jock Strap, I mean, Support. For the above-mentioned reasons. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 04:06, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For. Because i wouldnt disagree with Keitei --Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3 NotM ::: 04:22, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For, because I talk to him on IRC sometimes.—Mandaliet 06:00, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For because we need another person with the same word thrice repeated in their username to win Noob of the Month. --Savethemooses 16:50, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For-- Well if I cant win this month, hes by far the best choice. I'll be the bigger man here. Just remember me for January... --Sir Cornbread 22:16, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For Because he's the only one whose name I recognize. -- S P I N N I E 19:21, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
I cancelled my vote because just as I was about to submit it, my eye started to itch something awful. If God wanted to communicate with me, that's probably how he'd do it.-- S P I N N I E 19:21, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Half Vote --Splaka 00:29, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Whywhywhy not vote for? I dont know cause I am...voting for that is...-- 12:41, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

### King_In_Yellow (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Nomination suspended until he writes a full article. (see below) Nomination -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 20:38, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comment: I'd thought about him, but he hasn't written a 'full article' yet, has he? -- T. (talk) 20:44, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Gah! You jobsworths with your forms and rubber stamps, dammit! -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 16:15, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Premature vote: If he's eligible he has my vote, this guy is fantastic. Write an article so you can be the n00b, Yellow. Also start IRCing so you can be an admin. --Sir gwax (talk) 04:42, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Aagh! The crushing pressure! Well, alrighty then.--King In Yellow 16:53, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
There's still time! Go go go!!! :) -- T. (talk) 18:53, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

# Uncyclopedian of the Month

## June 2005

### User:EvilZak and User:Carlb

OK I therefore Propose EvilZak & Carlb as the first recipients of the Cub Scout Uncyclopedia Proficiency Badge, who'll second? --Elvis 07:10, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I suppose you'll want an administrator for that. But if you don't care, I second. --Cowation 07:20, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I can identify 15 types of birds. --Savethemooses 18:33, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
That's realy cool, mooses. --Cowation 22:12, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Made this: Template:UOTM--Insertwackynamehere CUN 19:01, 5 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Cool!! --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 20:21, 5 Aug 2005 (UTC)

## September 2005

### User:IMBJR

For his sterling work on QVFD and VFD this month. --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 22:24, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)

• Yes since no one else is voting here -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:33, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• For --Insertwackynamehere | Talk 14:18, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

### User:Marcos Malo

For QVFD Patrol--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 22:59, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)

• Support! Splaka 08:59, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• Thank You Elvis and Splarka, but I must decline, as IMBJR is a much more worthy candidate and deserves the recognition more than I do. Nominate me again next month, when I've been around a bit longer. In the meantime, I think I could be a lot more effective and efficient on QVFD if someone would make me an admin.
It's not an eithier or so you can both get it in one month, it's not a competition.--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 22:57, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Well, in that case, I better start campaigning, getting the vote out! =) --10:12, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)

And yes for Marcos too. Spread the love around -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:33, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• For --Insertwackynamehere | Talk 14:18, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

### User:Splaka

For being good at reporting bad articles on IRC, turning down adminship, and doing a whole lot of great work for the Uncyclopedia in general --Insertwackynamehere | Talk 04:03, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• For if it will delay my (according to Pants: Inevitable) adminship! I am too green! Really. --Splaka 04:12, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• For Hah. This will delay nothing. NOTHING!!! --PantsMacKenzie 19:24, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• For What would happen if someone just admined him? I mean, what would he do - ban himself? I have yet to find the "unmake me an admin" button. Ooooh, right, that's the "Ban the other admins, blank & protect the Estonia, RuneScape, and Lithuania pages, and insult Chronarion" button. Right next to the + button I just was introduced to. -- 02:27, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• Strongly oppose. His sig's too long as it is. Ah, who am I kidding. For, really. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:42, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• I'm going to vote for him because he is The Man. --Carlos the Mean 16:51, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

## October 2005

MadMax won. Dawg was little or no competition.

• Nominated and vote For For tireless work in quality control, ban patrolling, and taking his name from a poor movie. --—rc (t) 00:54, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Fore! --Splaka 00:58, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• For --Insertwackynamehere | Talk 00:59, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Four 01:18, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Comment Wow. What a welcome. :) I'm really not sure what to say, as a simple thank you doesn't quite seem to be enough, other then that it must be a slow month. While I greatly appreciate being nominated however, I'm sure there are plenty of authors who've contributed far more then I. While I'd like to think my edits are helpful, a well written article or humorous template is a far more valuable contribution then any routine maintenance I could make (regardless of the number). Although I am very flattered by the offer, it’s certainly enough to know my contributions are appreciated. MadMax 17:52, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Writers who contribute ActualFunnyContent get put into Uncyclopedia:Writer of the Month, the UotM award is more for everything outside of writing. Btw, we would have nominated you for Noob of the Month but you've been around too long via IP ^_^. --Splaka 19:54, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Hmm..looks like I'm outvoted, and no I don't have a humorous comeback for Rcmurphy. ;-) MadMax 03:47, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

## November 2005

Rangeley was close enough to Todd_Lyons to make a lack of majority. Given to both.

### Rangeley (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

• I nominate Rangeley because he is the guy who came up with the idea for Colonization. If thats not enough for you, look how much he has tried to do for Uncyclopedia by getting people to improve articles that suck. If this isn't enough for you then I don't know what is.Runiteshark 00:32, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For: Sounds good. Congratulations Rangley. MadMax 22:18, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Support. The concept is excellent, the articles chosen are important but neglected, and the results have been very, very good. -- T. (talk) 10:44, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Support, the colonizations are working wonderfully Kikimora 20:13, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Agreed --Caiman 20:15, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• I vote for him because he has sex with Lepers. 07:22, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For for voting for Todd ^_^. --Splaka 00:55, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Against.......only to force a deserved "draw"... :) --

### Todd_Lyons (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

• I nominate and vote for Todd. Because I can. Bwahaha! --Splaka 11:02, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Splarka, you ol' softie (the other admins are right). I am thankful and accept the nomination but would encourage people to vote for someone else. I'm already nommed for NOTM, and that's already a nice pat on the back. Of course, if I miss both awards, I'll be pissed, but... :) -- T. (talk) 21:18, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
I think he must be Splarka's sockpuppet!--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 16:49, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Vote for Todge! I think he's done enough for NOTM AND UOTM. And SysOp. And should be named Sovereign of several small Scottish Islands. All Hail Todd!!! --
• For: Todd has done a lot this month. --Ogopogo 06:51, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For: His "Characters I Like To Quote" list is reason enough.--Naughtyned 15:33, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
LOL! Well I'm glad that bit was personally appealing to you, but I hope people are appreciating the other stuff on my resume.  :) -- T. (talk) 16:55, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For: Tidying up some vandalism to my favourite article, as well as doing a good job of keeping many, many articles tidy, and he still finds time to come up with original funny content. Thanks :) (this vote by User:slainAngel, but I don't seem to be able to log in from the university computers) 194.80.32.8 17:25, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For:Because I just remembered that it's not an "either/or" award. Prizes for all! -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:41, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Its still November where I live! ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 00:54, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

## December 2005

I don't know how this happened, but Rcmurphy got the most votes. All I can do is apologize.

### Some user

• An even more last minute entry. Some user really fits this honorary for several reasons. I won't bore you with them, they speak for themselves. Some user is like a good makeup mirror - makes you look like your own sock puppet good no matter what kind of lighting. Prettiestpretty 17:43, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Against. This is just blatant log-rolling. Besides, it's pretty obvious who's actually going to win, isn't it? --some user or whatever 19:49, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Dunno, Kim Jong-il is putting up a fight here. If things get tight I might have to forge some ballots tomorrow night. --—rc (t) 07:59, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

### MediaWIki default

• Last-minute nomination and vote. This guy kicks ass. 71.126.167.121 00:07, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

### Rcmurphy

• Nomination and vote for VFH, VFP, and basically being the resident bipedal swiss army knife around here for some time now.  :) -- T. (talk) 11:35, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For --Ogopogo 22:50, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC) -- um, sorry, Mom!
• Five --Splaka 23:04, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• I'm gonna have to go for a definitely deserves it. =] --KATIE!! 01:25, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Big Fat For -- 12:45, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Arr. I mean For. --officer designate Lugiatm 11:12, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For! Rcmurphy rocks! Jack Cain 11:28, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For. -- 22:37, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
The voters here seem to forget that he was responsible for Euroipods, an article that most uncyclopedians were against. Short memory spans, huh? Read the award description under the Wilde quote, idiot. -- T. (talk) 11:56, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Alright, I'll vote for him, even though his contribution record shows some very questionable activities, coupled with very little cleanup...... » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 19:16, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• If you're referring to that Pae Do unpleasantness, well, I was barely involved! I swear! --—rc (t) 04:35, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Oi! No, wait... no, Aye! Yeah, that's the ticket. Damn punks...--King In Yellow 15:50, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For. And the poor guy deserves it, too, if only for wasting a precious two hours of his life trying to have a rational discussion with Nerd42 about religion. --some user or whatever 19:55, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For OK, I'm game I'll vote FOR just because. Prettiestpretty 20:24, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Positivly Charged Ballot -- 12:23, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

### King In Yellow

Nominate and vote: I have been immensely impressed with King In Yellow's ability to find crap, QVFD, Ban Patrol and generally perform the dirty work in the dregs of Uncyclopedia; right now, he is my personal hero. --Sir gwax (talk) 04:46, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• For' What can I say. --Splaka 23:43, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For all the good times --
• Against. I "knew" her, and she wasn't all that good.  ;-) -- T. (talk) 11:23, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For About time your mom got some recognition from someone other than me. 71.126.167.121 01:22, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Against: I too, knew her in the bilical sense and she is certainly not all that good. --Sir gwax (talk) 16:24, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

### Kim Jong Il

I'd like to nominate Kim Jong II. Or whomever promoted him. :-). --Suresh 04:25, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For, and I make this vote of my own free will--Bradaphraser 18:18, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For If I don't, I worry that the central party authority will be sad with me... Jlove1982 22:34, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For Because it would be funny if a ficticious user was the Uncyclopedian of the Month. Also, Hitler wasn't nominated.

• For He would make an excellent administrator. --—rc (t) 04:32, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

# Writer of the Year

## Savethemooses (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +10
• Nom and For. This is a formality, really... 02:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• For. In a way, it's symbolic, because there were a lot of really good authors back then that are no longer around (Slackerboy, KP, and others)), but since STM is the only one left, AND he had that obscene number of features, and he needs an ego boost, and oh yeah, he's also an awesome writer... what was I saying?-- 02:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• For Yeah, STM is a comedy genius. /me mutters something about WP:DPOT —Braydie at 21:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• For The guy's an inspiration. He deserved to be backdated, arf arf --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 17:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Foregone conclusion. As good a writer as ever there was. Spang 17:59, 6 Feb 2007
• For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 22:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• For, see all of the above. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 01:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
• For Up until 3 days ago I didn't even know we had a SavetheMooses. I didn't think they made them anymore. Why didn't anyone tell me?! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
• For. Did I ever tell you about the time STM sold me into slavery? He once gave me a videotape of him having sex with my wife, and it was the most beautiful thing I ever saw. He's one helluva sonofabitch. TO MOOSE BRASKY! --Anyone 21:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
• For I dislike this retroactive award stuff, yet I feel obligated to vote to ensure nobody else wins. That said, some of the other giants of Uncyc Year One who aren't around so much anymore deserve mention: Slackerboy, LeeHarveyKennedy, KP. NEVAR FARGET —rc (t) 21:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment. Damn, how did I forget LHK...-- 22:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Indeed, I would've put it to a vote, but they're all gone, and I mean, come on, it's Stm we're talking about here. He always wins. 01:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• For hilarious, inside and out of his articles. WP:DPOT and OliproPLUS come to mind. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

## KP (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +1
• Too late for competition, but how could we not give the author of such classics as Red Shirts and War on Terra the recognition they deserve. KP is still around too... -- 01:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 Awards, Decorations and Honours Awards Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars Ranks &Honours Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment Potatochopper of the Month Limelight VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · Uncyclopedia:Top 10 Articles of 2013 · Hall of Shame Prix citron Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS Events citron Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions