Uncyclopedia:VFH

1. Nom and for. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  11:46, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
2. Nice. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 12:39, 15 November 2009
3. For. me mattlobster. (hello) 14:29, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 19:58, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

1. Nom & For. ARTICLE AWESOME! --Invincibleflamegruemaster 06:18, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
2. I like it Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Talk to the Pole} 18:59, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
3. Just about good enough. And it's "been done" a couple years ago, so I don't see how that's relevant. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 12:38, 15 November 2009

1. Been done. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Saturday, 09:39, Nov 14 2009
2. Not main page material. • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 • • • 14:36, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
3. Against per Necro. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 07:04, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
4. Against. Kindergarten, short trousers stuff in my view. RomArtus (talk) 17:48, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
5. Against. El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 20:00, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

NOW I wrote the name of the article right. --Invincibleflamegruemaster 06:20, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

1. SNF. I'm really pretty pleased with how this one came out. It got a good Pee Review. Hope someone besides me likes it :) pillow talk 17:30, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
2. For. It's pretty awesome, plus it links to my userpage. Where the Wild Colins Are - LET THE WILD RUMPUS START! 21:29, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
3. For. Best article I've read for months* -- El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 22:26, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
4. Excellent. "...the rightful place of an empowered woman is in the kitchen." Darn straight. Now make me a sandwich. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Saturday, 01:27, Nov 14 2009
5. Bitchin'--monika 01:36, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
6. For. MrN  01:45, Nov 14
7. Penis. • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 • • • 03:12, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
8. For..--    14:56, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
9. For. One of those occasion when I think "That was really good. I wonder who wrote it." The answer is Hyperbole annoyingly often. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  14:59, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
10. For. Yes, I do like this. 81.129.229.243 16:01, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
11. NUNS. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 18:16, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
12. For. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:37, 14 Nov
13. Boobs. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 12:35, 15 November 2009
14. For. IronLung 17:58, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. Starts out pseudo academic and then plops into pseudo rant mode half way through. Not a VFH for me. RomArtus (talk) 17:55, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

• "*" I have read approximately 3 articles in the last 2 months -- El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 22:27, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

1. It's a Pile of Socks. Enormous Socks. Of Genoa. WOOO! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 18:46, 11 November 2009
2. Oh, what the hey. It's well-written, and brought many chuckles. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 21:58, Nov
3. It's short, but it works. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 05:40, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
4. Charming --monika 05:53, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
5. For. I vote for anything. :) • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 • • • 15:36, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
6. Self-for. I kind of like this one. pillow talk 23:15, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
7. For. I found this really, really stupid. But also well-written and funny.     Father WHY??? (confessions)  05:34, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. Not pants. MrN  01:56, Nov 14

1. Against. Starts off well and then seems to be in a hurry to finish. Therefore looks at best incomplete or half an idea not fully executed. RomArtus (talk) 17:58, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

1. For Because deporting all our religious maniacs to the US seems have worked out. --I'mthedaddy 14:42, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
2. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:02, 11 November 2009
3. For. It makes history come alive, which is pretty messed up if you think about it. Sir Modusoperandi ^{Brute! Boinc!} 17:59, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
4. Self For Because I'm vain like that. --Sog1970 18:24, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
5. For. I loved this article so much that it is now covered with my own pee. IronLung 19:38, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
6. Brilliant --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 05:39, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
7. For. Quality Soggy Lesson in History (pay attention at the back !). RomArtus (talk) 07:08, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. After reading this again, I don't feel that this should be an FA. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Friday, 08:24, Nov 13 2009

• IronLung's helpful pee here
• Abstain. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 18:36, Nov 11 2009

1. NF - a wee bit of history from Master Operandi. Read, children, and smarten up. You're all uneducated rednecks. ~ 12:14, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
2. Ja. • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 • • • 12:28, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
3. For the part of history they never tell you. And give a listen to Mordillo's amusing audio. Sir Modusoperandi ^{Brute! Boinc!} 16:15, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 10:24, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
5. Yesh. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:04, 11 November 2009
6. For. I really liked it. ChiefjusticeDS 20:00, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
7. For Can we change the top date from 2007 though? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 05:42, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:41, 14 Nov

1. Against. Didn't find it funny.     Father WHY??? (confessions)  21:46, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. It's a decent article, but not FA worthy in my opinion. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 18:34, Nov 11 2009
3. Against. RomArtus (talk) 17:59, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

1. Self nom + for Because rescuing hypothermic halfwits on DofE expeditions makes my life complete. --Sog1970 09:23, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
2. For. • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 • • • 14:43, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
3. For El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 10:27, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
4. Yup. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:05, 11 November 2009
5. For. See the PEE review. ChiefjusticeDS 22:29, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
6. For. The first person to win this award was the Duke of Edinburgh as he was a penniless Danish-Greek prince with his arse hanging out of his trousers when he married Princess Elizabeth of Windsor Great Park. RomArtus (talk) 07:11, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
7. For I'm voting for the three lines of this I actually wrote. The rest is the rantings of a diseased mind. --I'mthedaddy 09:15, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:23, 14 Nov 2009

No against votes

• Remodelled along lines of Chief's Pee
• Abstain. Normally I enjoy British humour but this goes way over my head. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 18:26, Nov 11 2009

All British humour is over the Duke of Edinburgh's head. Which is why we all love him so dearly. --Sog1970 18:29, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom + For Let's hope this one doesn't get completely raped like my last two nominated articles did. ---Matfen815 13:03, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
2. For. I wasn't really expecting to enjoy an article about this guy, but it was certainly entertaining. SuperBario 18:56, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
3. For. It looks better. I change my vote. InMooseWeTrust 19:23, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. I have seen Glengarry Glen Ross (and he was awesome in it) and he was also pretty good in The Cooler, which I have also seen. It should be noted that he was also seen in that movie with him and Sean Connery in a runaway submarine with the overactor from Rocky Horror Picture Show and the underactor from Jurassic Park or something. It should also be noted that he's a shitty actor (he's got two expressions: "pursed lips" and "squint". Sometimes, when he's really, really acting, he combines the two). Sir Modusoperandi ^{Brute! Boinc!} 21:18, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
5. For. I thought that was Bill Pullman too. Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo11 08:07, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
6. Looks about right. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:06, 11 November 2009
7. Sure. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 18:16, Nov 11 2009
8. For.Now a supporter after the changes made by the author. --RomArtus (talk). 19:43, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
9. 98% Bless Liked most of it, but was turned off by that "All your awards are belong to Arec Baldwin" picture Che } 01:56,12November,2009
10. For. Why not? • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 • • • 15:40, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
11. He was great in that one thing.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 01:11, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. To me, this article seemed well written, but was trying to go in too many directions at once, and I didn't find it funny.     Father WHY??? (confessions)  21:42, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. The Christopher Lee/Clone story doesn't improve this and could be dropped entirely without affecting the rest of the article (it has shades of randumbo for me) . It is also not quite focused enough to bring out the main joke(s) as regards Baldwin either. RomArtus (talk). 07:09, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

1. Self-Nom 'n' For. I wrote this for PLS but only got an honorable mention. So I got it reviewed and the Chief says it's good to go. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Monday, 07:02, Nov
2. For. The title fits better now. • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 • • • 12:32, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
3. For. InMooseWeTrust 17:40, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. I think I said what needed saying already. It amused me. ChiefjusticeDS 22:30, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
5. For. Using cliche's to add classical humor, and it's readible without being boring. 146.186.13.199 14:27, November 10, 2009 (UTC)

   For. This is the sh*t my father pulled on me when I was young. 146.186.13.199 14:28, November 10, 2009 (UTC) Much as I appreciate it, you voted twice. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Tuesday, 19:30, Nov 10 2009

6. KA-BLOOOOSH!!!!!! .     Father WHY??? (confessions)  20:57, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
7. Fish! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:08, 11 November 2009
8. For. You're a giant whore. Where the Wild Colins Are - LET THE WILD RUMPUS START! 02:39, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
9. For. I liked it. Jam Man 02:46, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
10. Phwoar But you should have seen the prize that got away! Going on hiatus...

1. Against. Didn't make me laugh, sorry. Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo11 12:31, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. It is a bit like an UnBook really. No fish for me today. RomArtus (talk). 19:40, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

• Name change I changed the name of the article based on 3 users' opinions at User talk:Romartus. They said it fits better. So alright then. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Thursday, 15:11, Nov 12 2009
• Abstain. Not in love with it. Don't dislike it, and it's written pretty well, but I didn't really get more than a smile or two. One suggestion: if it's going to be an UnBook now instead of HowTo, I would unbold the phrase "How to fish" in the intro. Also, I'm not a fan of including pics with "Stock Photo" written across them. Che } 23:04,14November,2009

1. Nom and for. The author withdrew this to expand and edit based on the advice of readers and a Pee Review. What I thought was a feature-worthy article is now even better.     Father WHY??? (confessions)  06:39, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
2. For. On balance - a for though it stills looks a bit undercooked in the centre. RomArtus (talk). 08:38, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
3. Self For. Sorry it got nommed before I was totally finished! It's done now. Dame Pleb Cpt. Miley Spears (talk) 23:13, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. I hate the Spears. All of 'em. But not this article. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 03:09, Nov 4 2009
5. For. but Eww pregnant people. breeders. --Puffskein 04:16, November 4, 2009 (UTC) Puffskein 04:16, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
6. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:39, 4 November 2009
7. for. wow, i was impressed with this, considering i thought i would hate it. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:29, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. InMooseWeTrust 17:47, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
9. Fawr. • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 • • • 18:56, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
10. For. per above Mn-z 06:12, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
11. Let it be Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Talk to the Pole} 12:30, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
12. For Time for Jamie to get a greater exposure. mattlobster. (hello) 12:47, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

• Comment Pee Reviews really help and so do readers' suggestions! Dame Pleb Cpt. Miley Spears (talk) 21:14, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom+For. Something about turkeys. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:10, 2 November 2009
2. Turkey. Nice food. Nice cantry. Nice wezar. Byramids! • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 • • • 15:34, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
3. For. This was nominated last year, I think, but ultimately wasn't featured because it wasn't nommed near Thanksgiving. But now it's all good! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Monday, 21:36, Nov 2 2009
4. For. I enjoyed it. ChiefjusticeDS 09:01, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
5. For. RomArtus (talk). 07:30, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
6. For. This article's a turkey.     Father WHY??? (confessions)  19:26, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
7. I don't want anybody else. When I think about you, I touch myself. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 01:26, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. It's fresher now.--    14:58, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
9. For. InMooseWeTrust 17:48, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
10. For. However the newly added links are a bit distracting for me. Or maybe I had too much coffee just now. *twitch**twitch* ☊ⱧⱧⱧ☊ 14:50, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. What the? This article isn't funny. It could be extremely offensive to many people, and it just doesn't have any pizzazz or sparkle or edge to it. So, NO. --Invincibleflamegruemaster 05:27, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
2. reluctant against due to the alarming lack of links. if this isn't corrected soon, i'll do it myself, because this article is awesome. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:15, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

   Go for it.     Father WHY??? (confessions)  21:32, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

   Well, it looks like DrStrange already went ahead with it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 07:08, 10 November 2009

   I even added advice to resist the temptation to run over small children with a shopping cart like an SUV.--    13:20, November 10, 2009 (UTC)

• Can we have this featured on Thanksgiving? --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (vote!)} 14:39, November 10, 2009 (UTC)

  Which nation's Thanksgiving?     Father WHY??? (confessions)  19:34, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

  That of the USA, naturally. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 19:45, 12 November 2009

1. Nom+For. A nice article by DrStrange. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:07, 2 November 2009
2. For • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 • • • 15:40, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
3. For. Almost a little too sciency..but it leads to Star Crap...so understandable — H. Peebles - D - HS 00:40, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. Underplayed humour but it works. RomArtus (talk). 08:10, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
5. For. El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 20:08, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
6. For. I found it very well-written and uncyclopedic, but a little low on humour. Then I got sucked in at the end and found it very funny.     Father WHY??? (confessions)  19:20, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
7. For. InMooseWeTrust 17:52, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. MrN  05:13, Nov 14
9. For. The humor's in the curious validations of an absurd hypothesis.--    12:23, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. I never laughed. This is almost a Wikipedia article, it's so dry. The only attempts at jokes I could see were passing Godzilla references. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Monday, 21:31, Nov 2 2009
2. Against. Just couldn't get into this one. It is vaguely amusing in places but, never seemed to get any better than that. ChiefjusticeDS 08:59, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
3. against as per those other againsts. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:45, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

• Comment: That was my first mainspace article so I went ahead and gussied it up a little this morning--    14:26, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

1. For People seemed to like the letters. Now more like an encyclopedia-entry. --Sog1970 21:24, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
2. For. -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 05:34, Oct 27
3. For. --ChiefjusticeDS 11:20, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 16:09, 27 October 2009
5. For. Hills covered with wet sheep. That's badass :) • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 • • • 18:16, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
6. O blaid Cymru am byth, old fruit. --I'mthedaddy 12:38, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
7. For. I really like this. --UU - natter 12:41, Oct 28
8. for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:14, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
9. For. RomArtus (talk). 11:41, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
10. For. I saw this story on "Unsolved Mysteries." Or was it on "Fox News?" Also I think she really didn't have to worry about taking the time to wash her undies.     Father WHY??? (confessions)  19:09, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
11. For. Jude the Obscure 22:47, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
12. For. InMooseWeTrust 17:55, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

PEE

1. For + Self-Nom. I was commanded by der UnFührer to nominate this --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 20:40, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
2. Very For. Per my review. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:50, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
3. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 16:35, 23 October 2009
4. For I like it... --Matfen815 17:02, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
5. For. This is the kind of article I like alot. Brilliant ideas, clever language and funny. mattlobster. (hello) 17:09, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
6. For. Just as I was staring thoughtfully ahead, almost getting bored with the repetition, you changed it. A well-timed switch.     Father WHY??? (confessions)  22:58, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
7. For. ChiefjusticeDS 10:17, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
8. For. RomArtus (talk). 11:25, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
9. For. I dont know who he is either, but reading this told me exactly who he is and in a very enjoyable way... Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 18:15, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
10. For. • MAHMOOSHA 2.0 • • • 03:24, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
11. For. Really well done. --UU - natter 12:05, Oct 28
12. For. InMooseWeTrust 18:00, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

1. I am not indie enough to understand who this "Charles Kaufberg" character is. Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 10:00, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
2. against. a little per murderfrog, a little per not finding enough chuckles. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:48, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
3. Alright then. And dude, quit with this fucking after-the-fact justifications of your poor decisions. You said the same bullshit when I critiqued Plink for PLS. If you want to stick by your poor choices that's 100% fine, but don't try to undermine my criticisms by making up some half-assed reasoning for article elements just to retort every critical comment. You're a decent writer, but here's yet another tip: respect your elders (especially ones who were WOTY and have decent bullshit detectors). --THINKER 00:53, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

What? Maybe there's a minor misapprehension here. All I did was disagree with your opinion. I respect your view, but I disagree. I do have a history of accepting criticism. Sorry if you took my comment personally, but I meant no disrespect at all, and I fail to read disrespect in my comment. Apologies. --    GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, film critic 05:50, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

• Abstain on account of lack of knowledge about the subject matter. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Friday, 05:40, Oct 23 2009
  • I knew people would be abstaining on this one. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:50, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
    • Glad I didn't disappoint. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Sunday, 04:48, Oct 25 2009
• Abstain. cause I'm a n00b and I don't know tihs dude -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 04:13, Oct 26
• Abs. pending some style improvement. The tip template is not the right choice for its use here. Like what I see comedy-wise though: I'll give it another more thorough read through if the formatting gets worked out. I'm rooting for ya as Kaufman is ripe for the treatment, the sad, brilliant motherfucker he is.. --THINKER 06:08, October 26, 2009 (UTC)

I think the Tip template enhances the amusement of the amusing juxtaposition of all of those similar white male in abject isolation staring thoughtfully ahead poses - one from each film - and it got a great response in the review. This may be a matter of taste - I am in love with its use here. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 06:39, October 26, 2009 (UTC)