Uncyclopedia:VFH

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

(Redirected from UN:VFH)
Jump to: navigation, search


All nominations

VFH contents
Welcome to the Uncyclopedia Votes for Highlight page. To nominate an article, type the name into the box below and follow the directions.
  • Vote for an article you find excellent.
  • Previous featured articles can be found in the VFH archive.
  • Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism. Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
  • Articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, UnTunes, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are eligible for VFH. Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded.
  • If a nomination disappears from this page, it is likely to be found in either the recently featured or recently failed nomination lists.
  • If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
Any and all violators of policy will be dissected.

Nominate


Self-nomination regulation: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must receive at least one critique via Pee Review before nomination (or at spend a week on Pee Review if you can't get anyone to look at it). Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).

VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.

All nominated articles

[vote]

Drama (Uncyclopedia)‎

Score: 1 fuckers who don't agree with me
Nomination:
User:PuppyOnTheRadioUser talk:PuppyOnTheRadioSpecial:Contributions/PuppyOnTheRadioPuppyOnTheRadio

For Votes: 4
  1. Of course, because if I don't do it nw somebody else will. And I fully expect <insert name here> to vote against. Wanker!
    User:PuppyOnTheRadioUser talk:PuppyOnTheRadioSpecial:Contributions/PuppyOnTheRadioPuppyOnTheRadio
  2. HELL YESSS Probably the biggest for I've ever given. Because I'm in it bitches!!!! Che 15px-SBQ3.JPG } 01:02,23December,2009
  3. Drama vote. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 02:02, 23 December 2009
  4. For. Smug? Self-congratulating? Me? Well, you're entitled to your opinion, but I can't see how you could come to that conclusion. Then again, perhaps that's because I'm awesome. ---Matfen815 02:51, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 3
  1. Against. Unbearably smug and self-congratulating. mattlobster. (hello) 00:03, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against. I liked it, but I've always been of the opinion that FAs are meant for the general public, and I don't think the general public is gonna like it. Although, in fairness, they'd like it a lot more than they'd like User:Mhaille (what the hell is going on over there?) Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 02:58, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Against. per hype. Mn-z 04:13, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

[vote]

A CCTV Nativity

Score: 2 Chavs a-leaping
Nomination: Probably too late for Christmas I'mthedaddy 22:13, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
For Votes: 2
  1. Nom and For A gift to my little brother at Xmas. --I'mthedaddy 22:13, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
  2. For. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 02:00, 23 December 2009
Against Votes: 0

No against votes

[vote]

Your estimate of how long to reheat the lasagna

Score: 7 minutes you estimated (poorly)
Nomination: Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 18:38, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
For Votes: 7
  1. I found this after it was whored over on VFD by the guy that wrote the book on how to whore your article on VFD. That in itself made the whole thing worth while. But then, I actually read it, and after numerous failed attempts to keep my sniggering down at work, I finished it and now am nominating it. In short, I love this article because it is hilarious. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 18:38, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
  2. For I have to agree. This is fantastic. mattlobster. (hello) 23:27, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
  3. For. As long as it's not my Haggen-Dazs ~Jewriken.GIF 00:06, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
  4. For. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 01:59, 23 December 2009
  5. Self-for. I guess if I'm gonna be a whore, I ought to go all the way. After all, whores that don't go all the way often end up shot. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 02:42, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
  6. For. Great read. I thought of nomming this myself, but someone else seems to have done it for me. ;) —Pelargonium MUN Talkpage My Contributions
  7. For. per above. Mn-z 04:12, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0

No against votes

[vote]

UnNews:Living creatures found to be bad for other living creatures

Score: 0 Poops that are ruining everything.
Nomination:     19:55, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
For Votes: 4
  1. Nom & For. Poo poos? --    19:55, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Murderous For. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 20:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
  3. Self For, even though voting for this is probably killing the earth. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 22:09, December 21, 2009
  4. Totally For I thought it was hilarious, and fun to read out loud! --Theroachyjay 05:25, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 4
  1. Against. The writing isn't that great, it rambles a lot, it's long, especially for a UnNews article. Sorry, I didn't like it. rev. zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) I am the dirt under your rollers. 15:13, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against I kinda agree with Zim. Not that it's too long (I don't mind long UnNews articles as long as they stay interesting or funny throughout, and this isn't even that long in my opinion. I've seen much longer. This is where you think penis.), but rather it doesn't do a well-enough job mocking the idiocy of saying that our pets are destroying the Earth, not our gas-guzzling ways. Plus, such phrases as "Have these fish given thanks to earth for this? Have they kept their rented homes clean? No!", "A more gruesome outcome, I shudder to fantasize about.", and "The nerve!" don't fit with the third-person tone of normal news articles. There are also a few minor grammatical errors that need fixing, but those bother my dangles enough to fix them myself. And yes, I said my dangles. Dangles is apparently a word. Urban Dictionary has some sort of hockey-related definition for it. Surprising. Pleb KUN Dexter111344 Complain here Vote now! 15:56, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Needs more work per Dexter. Good concept, some funny lines, but I think the writing needs a little more tightening before it's good for feature. Sorry. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 02:54, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Against. per above, concept is ok, but the language needs to be tightened. Mn-z 04:17, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

[vote]

Unfomercials:Mutter_-_mein_Endlosung!

Score: 9 that killed 6 million Jews and nobody cares about that
Nomination: Ptok-BentonicznyTalk to the Pole 13:13, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
For Votes: 9
  1. Nom+4 That's just sick! Ptok-BentonicznyTalk to the Pole 13:13, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  2. For. I thought I would comment something but... The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 13:22, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  3. For. I fuckin' lolt, hard. The Ugandan Government Should Cease Existence. Yoweri Museveni can go die, too. Fuck Uganda. 20:37, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Four. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 20:55, 21 December 2009
  5. For. Is there still time to order one for Christmas? --Sog1970 23:25, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  6. For. You people make me sick. Sir Modusoperandi Brute! Boinc! 02:25, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
  7. For. A welcome addition to the Mein Wenig Fuehrer (My Little Fuehrer) toy range. RomArtus Imperator(talk) 13:14, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
  8. For Every child should have one. --I'mthedaddy 22:17, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
  9. For. per above. Mn-z 04:20, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0

No against votes

Comments

[vote]

The Rough Guide to Gotham City

Score: 11 Fat men in tights
Nomination: I'mthedaddy 15:09, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
For Votes: 11
  1. Nom + For I like it it and should have done this before--I'mthedaddy 15:09, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
  2. This is good stuff. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:16, 20 December 2009
  3. For RAWR! Pleb KUN Dexter111344 Complain here Vote now! 15:32, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
  4. For. Sog rarely disappoints. He hasn't here. RomArtus Imperator(talk) 22:37, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
  5. For. I did a review a while back, enjoyable then, enjoyable now. ChiefjusticeDS 22:38, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
  6. For. Beat me to the nom! ---Matfen815 01:24, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  7. For. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 15:53, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  8. Self For. --Sog1970 16:38, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  9. For. Holy good article Batman! --UU - natter 11:23, Dec 22
  10. For. Was I not expecting to like that. mattlobster. (hello) 00:11, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
  11. For. per above Mn-z 04:22, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0

No against votes

Comments

Chief's useful pee here

[vote]

UnBooks:Menstruation: A Guide For Men by Jack Black

Score: 5 elmo flow charts
Nomination: Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 13:09, 20 December 2009
For Votes: 5
  1. Nom+For. Another masterpiece from DrStrange. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 13:09, 20 December 2009
  2. Freaky.  –  FuhQ.gif ZDsig.gif Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN 06:54, 21 December 2009
  3. For. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 14:38, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  4. For. A bit like a 'Back of The Bike Sheds' guide to sex but still funny. Not Suitable For Virgins. RomArtus Imperator(talk) 13:04, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
  5. For Worth it for the Elmo image. --I'mthedaddy 22:19, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
  6. For. per abovez Mn-z 04:27, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0

No against votes

[vote]

HowTo:Write Colin Meloy Lyrics

Score: 6 intelligent people with good taste
Nomination: ~Scriptsiggy.JPG 09:57, Dec 19, 2009
For Votes: 8
  1. Self-nom + For. I don't think I can add anything anymore, and Why? helped me a lot with it. ~Scriptsiggy.JPG 09:57, Dec 19, 2009
  2. It's good enough. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 18:38, 19 December 2009
  3. For. This borderline-Decemberists-fan likes it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 22:08, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
  4. For.    moonshine   • 21:03 • Sunday, 20-12-2009
  5. Weak For. I had to do some background reading before voting. A well written piece though perhaps the humour is more of a chuckle than a lol. RomArtus Imperator(talk) 23:05, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
  6. The punishment for this failure is called a Grammy. Once I saw that I knew I had to vote here. --Nikau 01:32, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  7. For I had no fucking clue who this guy was, yet found it hilarious. Although I found the last paragraph a bit redundant, it's still good enough. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 11:01, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  8. For. Thought it was almost featurable before my Pee Review; think it's ready now (and I didn't know Colin Meloy either, but am scrutinizing the sagacious songsmith simultaneously while scribing this studied synopsis).     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  19:17, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2
  1. um if this makes anyone other than Decemberists fans/haters laugh I'll be kinda surprised... well, not all of it, I don't want to give it too little credit... 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 18:26, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
  2. I did not lol. -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png CUN18:28, 19 Dec
Comments

[vote]

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Essay in the Jones of text

Score: 4 tit-munching crocodiles
Nomination: The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 05:50, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
For Votes: 11
  1. For. Submitting a rainbow for bulls to trample. The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 05:52, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Revolutionary. FUCK YEAH I AM SO PUNK ROCK! 05:54, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  3. no now i am even more of a cobweb 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 05:55, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Allllllllllllllright!RomanDogBird (TalkMorgan Freemaneat my shorts niggaHawkmansuck my balls) 06:07, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  5. Piss poor I love it! -- Kip the DipTalkWorksTreat WHORE! 06:10, Dec. 18, 2009
  6. For. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 09:05, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  7. For. Because I'm in it. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 12:04, 18 December 2009
  8. For. Per Romartus' misunderstanding of what an in joke is. Also, it's pretty funny and I voted to feature the article and this would go along nicely with it. Feature 'em both at the same time. -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png CUN12:19, 18 Dec
  9. For. It made me laugh. mattlobster. (hello) 15:41, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
  10. For Because everyone below are unfunny, over-thinking, idiots (When voting. I think many of them are quite funny writers). And that really annoys me. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 15:53, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
  11. For I don't even know why ---Pelargonium MUN (Talk) (Contribs) (Survey!) 05:25, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 7
  1. Against because I am incurably biased and hate everything Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Friday, 10:36, Dec 18 2009
    Did you think someone needed a reminder or what? -- The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 11:00, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
    Touché, Multi. Touché. Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Saturday, 11:38, Dec 19 2009
  2. On the usual - and good rule - about avoiding placing in jokes , user pages etc up for a VFH. RomArtus Imperator(talk) 11:51, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Against. Because I am a "tightass" and my first reaction on seeing this was not to seek out the author to congratulate him, but rather to check who needs ban patrolling for vandalising PEE review. ChiefjusticeDS 15:11, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Against. Even though I wrote a tiny part of this, my anal retentiveness makes me vote no. I don't want to encourage people screwing up the Pee Review process.     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  21:09, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
    since when would this affect pee review in any way. also CDS i was asked to review the article in an appropriate manner, which I feel I did. need i add that i was a respected pee reviewer long before you were even on this site 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 21:31, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
    I realise that you have done reviews, I didn't suggest at any point that you couldn't, I simply communicated my feelings upon looking at the page. You also appear to have misunderstood, my point was it looked like vandalism, I didn't say it was, also, no you didn't need to add that you have been doing reviews longer than me, as it isn't really relevant. I feel it shouldn't be a feature because I didn't find it pleasing to look at or to read. I have nothing against you personally or as a writer, but I have no interest in discussing the way I have voted further, I'm against, and that's how I plan to stay. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:17, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
    I have no problem with someone doing a joke Pee Review; I've thought about doing one myself--but not in the Pee Review space. And also regardless of intent, I can imagine a swarm of would-be comics jumping on legitimately wanted pee reviews and screwing it up for those who sincerely want to be reviewed. If this is moved to somewhere outside of the Pee Review space, that's fine. But I still wouldn't vote for it as a feature, even if I found it hiliarious, because no one who doesn't know our Pee Review system would be likely to get it.     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  02:39, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
  5. Against. per above Mn-z 06:14, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
  6. Against. I've done a couple of joke PEE reviews, but when it comes down to it I still try and put in meat into the review to actually help the person writing the article. In fact, I just completed a review done in the style of and then came here and saw what the comments on this are. But the long and the short of it is that although I have written reviews of a similar nature, I would never expect any of them to be nommed for front page, and I would likewise vote against them. I have nominated stuff like this for the humour factor of seeing it nommed, but never with the expectation of seeing it on front page. So while I think this is funny, and I enjoyed it, I think it's only funny to me because I'm on the inside of it looking out. To an outsider, this looks stupid.
    User:PuppyOnTheRadioUser talk:PuppyOnTheRadioSpecial:Contributions/PuppyOnTheRadioPuppyOnTheRadio
    Fail enough, my Puppy - which outsider were you thinking of? There are quite a few of them out there. Some of them even have similar sense of humour with you. -- The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 09:39, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
    Take this discussion to the talk page, don't continue it in the middle of the votes. --UU - natter 09:42, Dec 20
  7. Against. Illogicopedia already exists. Plus, while this is a fairly well-dresses word salad, a word salad it remains. I just don't find this funny, and as such I have to cast my "tightass" vote. --UU - natter 09:42, Dec 20
    Voting against this because you don't find it funny is in no way tightass. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, it is the best reason to vote against something. I actually give you a pat on the back for this, though I have no authority to, and my hands are greasy from eating all those potato chips.... should have gotten pringles. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:42, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
    I completely agree. You gave the best possible against reason UU (i hope that doesn't come across as sarcasm cos it wasn't supposed to...) 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 17:45, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
    I agree with UU, but totally disagree with Fag agreeing with him. -- The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 18:38, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
Comments

oh no words 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 05:57, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

  • The first bull. Would work great as an addition to Jones if that were featured. But on it's own it's not really that funny. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 08:28, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment. Yeah and of course nobody can find the article after reading the Pee. Stands to reason. The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 09:01, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
Good point, although made in an unecessarily sardonic way. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 09:05, December 18, 2009 (UTC
OK - sorry about that. -- The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 09:33, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

Romartus, since when was this an injoke, and there's no Userspace here so there's no rule against it being nominated 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 12:30, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

We could fill up VFH with in jokes for the next six months. I think it would be a HUGE turn off for new writers. If I had seen a page like this on the front page , that would be my reaction. --RomArtus Imperator(talk) 13:31, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
Did you even read what I said or what, cos that wasn't even a response. And I like how wherever you go you automatically assume yr opinion is shared by everyone else 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 13:47, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
Yes I read your reply. I don't know if my opinion is shared by anyone else but when ever articles like this have been placed up for VFH , they have usually been voted down for the reasons above in my NO vote. I am making the point of agreeing with that and that I am also concerned that if this gets the nod for VFH , it will just open the floodgates to all future articles like this getting here and getting voted on. Since what grounds could it be said not to be eligible ? --RomArtus Imperator(talk) 14:08, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
So what you're saying is that you want to eliminate the democratic process? "Oh no, if people vote for this, they might vote for something else I disapprove of! We can't have that, now can we?" The Ugandan Government Should Cease Existence. Yoweri Museveni can go die, too. Fuck Uganda. 17:18, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment. Would you mind continuing the discussion on some talk page, this or the article's, Mr Rule? The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 14:19, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  • I have not read the actual page, so I am unable to comment on its funniness or not, but after reading this page, I must make my neccesary link to User:The Woodburninator/RulesVsFunny, and walk away. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:29, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
    I love you man. -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png CUN17:34, 18 Dec
  • Recommendation. In the unlikely event that the tightasses actually let this get featured (as it should be) I would recommend removing all the comments before the review. They actually add nothing at all to the humor. -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png CUN17:43, 18 Dec
    • I tried to do that with Talk:Sania Mirza, (deleted unimportant comments that didn't say much, or add to the comedy) and nearly got banned for it. I doubt it happens. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:54, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
      • I think I enjoy the way it all comes in on something otherwise fairly civil 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 21:28, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment. wow - Chief Justice is getting tough on you Fag! -- The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 21:30, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
    • chief justice ain't got shit on me dog i'm a badman 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 16:33, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment. In all honesty, if this was the first Uncyc article I read, I would definitely come back for more. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 20:02, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment. Oh yeah and before I forget: Yakkety yakety yakkety yak. Obviously not to you Black Flamingo. The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 09:40, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment. Yo, againsts, spread the word too! I nominated this just to have a bit of a dickfight here. It's not front page material for such a mediocre site. The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 10:54, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

[vote]

UnNews:FACT CHECK: Birthday Card not as Accurate as Hoped

Score: 6.5 Sentences lacking logos
Nomination: You know what the music means... Our time is up. 01:13, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
For Votes: 6.5
  1. Self-Nom and For. My 1st UnNews, and after a glowing review by Chief, I considered it done enough to put up here. Enjoy!--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 01:13, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
  2. For. Sog1970 11:34, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
  3. For. The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 19:52, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
  4. For. While I think that it feels slightly unfinished, I still think it is a worthy VFH contender. ChiefjusticeDS 22:40, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
  5. For. Per Chief. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 08:31, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  6. For. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 12:11, 18 December 2009
  7. For. 68.2.218.207 05:16, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0

No against votes

Comments
  • Man, I really like this idea, but the implimentation was only half there for me. Too good for me to stand in the way of it getting featured though, so I decline a vote. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 21:36, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
  • Per Woody. I chuckled at the concept of the article, but it was sort of all concept. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 02:47, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

[vote]

UnBooks: My unusual relationship with a volley ball by the name of Wilson

Score: 8.5 People who like things that are so firm, so round and so attractive
Nomination: Sir ACROLO KUNFPWAOTMFA •(SPAM) 08:45, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
For Votes: 8.5
  1. snf A few pee reviews here and there and I have made all the suggested changes and here I am.
  2. For. Mostly balls but I like it. --Sog1970 10:07, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  3. For. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 10:44, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  4. For. Despite there being a superfluous space in the title. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 11:05, 14 December 2009
  5. For.. Out of the dozens of relationship-with-a-volley-ball stories I've read, this one has a nicer bounce.     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  22:54, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
  6. For. Great idea ! RomArtus Imperator(talk) 12:06, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
  7. For. See the reviews. ChiefjusticeDS 22:39, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
  8. WILLLLLLLLSON!! -- Kip the DipTalkWorksTreat WHORE! 06:26, Dec. 18, 2009
  9. For. 74.64.86.208 14:34, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0

No against votes

[vote]

User:Mhaille

Score: 7 incredibly skilled satirists
Nomination: Ж Kalir where's my house? 21:43, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
For Votes: 20
  1. Sure, why not? He's a cool guy. Ж Kalir where's my house? 21:43, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
  2. For the next 144 minutes (and counting- down.) Navwheel-small.png» DJ "Reaper of Fail" Gentoo, now with wit, sarcasm, and even more obscure folk metal. Now in lime green! 21:44, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Why has this not already had a feature? -- Sir Mhaille Image:Icons-flag-gb.png (talk to me)
  4. four Without a doubt, one of the coolest users around. Definitely worthy of a front-page mention.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   21:49, Sunday 13 December 2009  
  5. For!!!!!! Love, Image:Sig.PNG  02:51, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  6. Snowman. This made me laugh, raucously. The author, while he is a huge faggot, is a genius. FUCK YEAH I AM SO PUNK ROCK! 02:54, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  7. Yes! Yes! Yes! But seriously, remove that Bold text at the end. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 10:59, 14 December 2009
  8. Weak-For Although, it could use a little more Mhaille. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 19:20, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  9. MHAILLE 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 01:24, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
  10. For. MO got his privates featured, why not Mhaille?    moonshine  
  11. Who? -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png CUN17:57, 15 Dec
  12. For. Monkeys! rev. zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) I am the dirt under your rollers. 22:47, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
  13. For. Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 09:45, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
  14. For. Let's support a userpage feature... Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 00:20, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  15. Seriously. Only the best page ever.  –  FuhQ.gif ZDsig.gif Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN 06:25, 18 December 2009
  16. For. FUCK YOU!! The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 18:37, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
    Not you Zana, you know what I mean. -- The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 18:38, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  17. For. Reverse Genocide Cockatrices 13:22, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
  18. Za. Ptok-BentonicznyTalk to the Pole 13:17, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  19. For. Northern Solidarity... ---Matfen815 22:42, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
  20. For He's the greatest dancer!. mattlobster. (hello) 00:17, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 13
  1. Invalid nom User is a judge for ATDB. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 21:47, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
    This argument makes no sense. I move to strike it as being unfairly biased based on namespace.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   21:49, Sunday 13 December 2009  
    Your face is unfairly biased based on namespace, but I'd strike it anyway even if it weren't. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 21:52, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against. Too foreign. Sir Modusoperandi Brute! Boinc! 00:56, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Against. Just say No to egomaniacs. --RomArtus Imperator(talk) 07:30, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Zombiebaron. --UU - natter 09:48, Dec 14
  5. Against. Too English. ~Jewriken.GIF 09:58, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  6. Against. What he, he, he and he said ^ -- El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 18:19, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  7. LOL WUT Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 19:09, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  8. Against. I'm an Everton man myself. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 08:50, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
  9. Against. per not nominating userpages. Mn-z 17:02, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
  10. Against. Cool user page? Yes. Featured article? No.     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  22:26, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
  11. Against. ChiefjusticeDS 22:51, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  12. For raping Mhaille. Against featuring him. Pleb KUN Dexter111344 Complain here Vote now! 15:42, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
  13. C'mon Guys...Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 20:11, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment. Yakkety yakkety yak. The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 19:17, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment. Yakkety yakkety YAKKETY yakkety yak. The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 07:07, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
    The time I was nearly raped by a Yakkety yakkety YAKKETY yakkety yak during my sojourn in VFH.    moonshine   • 15:39 • Sunday, 20-12-2009

[vote]

New Threat to Christmas

Score: 10 disgruntled northern manual workers
Nomination: The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 06:50, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
For Votes: 12
  1. For. The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 06:53, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
  2. For. El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 10:50, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
  3. For. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 14:28, 13 December 2009
  4. For. Elves of the World Unite... RomArtus Imperator(talk) 18:44, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
  5. Elf-For --Sog1970 20:11, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
  6. For. As an "evil commie", I love all union stuff. This is great. SuperBario 08:15, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  7. For! Obviously - considering this guy's pro status My Tree! 09:14, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  8. For. If something is to be featured on Christmas day I guess it will be this. Sir ACROLO KUNFPWAOTMFA •(SPAM) 13:29, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  9. For. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 08:32, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
  10. For. Not entirely original but nicely done. --I'mthedaddy 10:19, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
  11. For.    moonshine   • 16:26 • Tuesday, 15-12-2009
  12. For.. Elves not living past 500 years? Terrible.     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  22:06, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2
  1. Against. I feel like I've heard this joke before at least once or twice. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 22:25, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against. Political correctness ruining christmas is a pretty old joke and I tire of hearing it, I'm sorry :( 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 08:35, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment. The concept may not be entirely original, but then I haven't seen anything about Christmas that was entirely original since Dicken's A Christmas Carol--unless you count South Park and the Christmas Poo.     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  22:08, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

[vote]

Red Herring

Score: 7
Nomination: Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 19:22, 11 December 2009
For Votes: 7
  1. Nom+For. DrStrange just finished another article. And it's quite an article, I might say. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 19:22, 11 December 2009
  2. For. Clever idea and the writer has made it work here. RomArtus Imperator(talk) 13:42, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
  3. For. First made me think, then made me laugh, then made me think again.     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  17:24, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
  4. For. El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 10:48, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
  5. For. ~Scriptsiggy.JPG 13:51, Dec 13, 2009 13:51, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
  6. For. -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png CUN23:10, 17 Dec
  7. For. The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 18:39, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0

No against votes

Comments
  • Comment. Just one problem. Header spells it Red Herring but article uses Redd Herring. Should that be change ? RomArtus Imperator(talk) 13:44, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
    I wanted to retain the proper spelling of the term "Red Herring" so that it simply looks like a page on terminology instead of a faux biography when looked at from the "outside". You do bring up a valid point because that particular effect would be lost on the front page as opposed to merely seeing a blue link in a list. Hmmmmm. Any opinions?--    13:59, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
    Would a redirect from Red Herring to Redd Herring (or visa versa) help?     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  17:25, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
    That would be fine by me. Redirect Red to Redd. Of course, Mongo only pawn in game of redirects and that technofear of not dealing with such issues on a regular basis.....could you help me? I'm just a caveman. When a plane flies overhead, I think it's a giant bird in the sky and I cower in fear.--    18:02, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
    So the article should just be moved to Redd Herring, right? Alright, done. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 12:45, 13 December 2009
    Socky done fixed.     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  02:42, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
    Way to fuck up the joke. Abstain till it gets changed back. -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png CUN18:04, 15 Dec
    Go to Red Herring and you'll see the exact same article you saw before at Red Herring (with the addition of a little redirect notice).     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  19:13, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
    Oh, is that how a redirect works? Thanks, I don't know what I would have done without your vast wiki editing experience. Abstain. -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png CUN21:38, 15 Dec
    You're welcome.     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  22:10, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment. How about my saying this doesn't flow to be satisfactory, the way I define it? The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 18:41, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  • Gah I know there's a deeper meaning in the article, but I'm just not finding it. :( Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Saturday, 12:30, Dec 19 2009
    I was shooting for: Politics is nothing more than swaying the sheep with pointless arguments meant to steer the public away from real issues and every political party plays the game just as bad as the other. Republicans and Democrats? Or just a bunch of whining toadies that don't represent much of anything? --    14:02, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

[vote]

Butter

Score: 6.5 Who prefer butter over I can't believe it's not butter
Nomination:  Steak.gifTALK  FRESH MEAT   talk to me 23:17 10 December 2009
For Votes: 9.5
  1. Nom and For. - This article was a bunch of garbage before Zana got to it.  Steak.gifTALK  FRESH MEAT   talk to me 23:17 10 December 2009
  2. I can't believe it's not featured Ptok-BentonicznyTalk to the Pole 10:44, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
  3. For per what Fresh Meat said. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 12:06, 11 December 2009
  4. Four I seem to constantly be getting this magical vote number. I feel so special.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   12:41, Friday 11 December 2009  
  5. For. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 19:47, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
  6. For. - I never would've thought this would be nommed. Here's to hoping it passes!  –  FuhQ.gif ZDsig.gif Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN 02:28, 13 December 2009
  7. For. 94.194.214.62 15:58, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
  8. For. The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 18:36, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
  9. For my favorite sex lube. -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png CUN17:51, 19 Dec
  10. For. Vote change after Zana's recent expansion of the article. Now spreads a lot thicker. --RomArtus Imperator(talk) 22:02, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 3
  1. Against. I liked the hotdog photo and caption, but the rest to me was largely "butter is great." To me it needs more work to be VFH.     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  17:01, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against. As per Rabbi, some good stuff in there but a little rough and rushed to be featured --El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 10:41, December 13, 2009 (UTC)

#Against. Needs to spread a bit further to be a feature. RomArtus Imperator(talk) 19:36, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

  1. Against as per Why. Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Saturday, 12:26, Dec 19 2009
Comments
  • I liked this, however I think to be featured some of it needs to be strengthened, particularly the opening paragraph. It's too random and doesn't suit the tone of the rest of the article, which sounds like it was written by someone working for a desperate butter manufacturer. My advice would be to keep this consitent throughout as I found it very funny. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 10:20, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
It really does. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 19:47, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
  • Well, I've 'spread' the article out a bit as suggested. I really don't think this subject calls for too long of an article.  –  FuhQ.gif ZDsig.gif Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN 08:39, 19 December 2009

[vote]

Holocaust film

Score: 6 inglorious bastürds
Nomination:
For Votes: 10
  1. Self-nom and For. Been reviewed by almost two people, ranks pretty high in Google and covers the subject way better than Wikipedia. --Kakun_Sig.JPG VFP Eincyc (talk) 20:59, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Yes. Great article. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 10:49, 10 December 2009
  3. For. as per Black_Flamingo. The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 11:15, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Four     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   11:22, Thursday 10 December 2009  
  5. Für. MAHMOOSHA 2.022px-Flag_of_Egypt.png 18px-Foxicon.png 12:13, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
  6. פֿאַר. Well constructed, some good laughs. Rabbi Techno Image:Icons-flag-gb.png kvetch Contribs FOXES 17:09, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
  7. For. 25px-Faglogo.pngtalk 14:48, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
  8. For. I lolt. FUCK YEAH I AM SO PUNK ROCK! 21:25, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
  9. For. Colin lolt. Good enough for me. -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png CUN21:31, 17 Dec
  10. Weak For. Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Saturday, 12:23, Dec 19 2009
Against Votes: 4
  1. Against. Awesome concept but only really laughed once (at the Best Winslet Oscar). --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 10:29, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against. Some nice writing in parts, but didn't find it funny.     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  16:56, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Against. Laughed more at what I thought might be the contents than the actual contents (aka good concept, unfunny execution) El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 10:36, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Against. I'm not sure I even understood what I just read. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 04:14, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment. I like the fact the writer has tackled an interesting subject - though I am pretty sure the inspiration for this has come from one of the episodes of Extras. I think it could do with some more work before coming back for a VFH. RomArtus Imperator(talk) 19:39, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
    AAAAAAGH! I CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE. It's not "a VFH". It's just VFH. Vote For Highlight. If it wins, then it becomes an FA. Featured Article. -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png CUN21:31, 17 Dec
    Point taken. Make sure to remind me if I/when I do it the next time - in CAPS if you prefer. --RomArtus Imperator(talk) 14:15, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
    Nothing personal mate, it's just a pet peeve of mine.  :D -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png CUN18:55, 18 Dec

[vote]

Radical Republicans

Score: 10 totally tubular conflicts of the 1800s
Nomination:
For Votes: 13
  1. Self-nomination and a vote in favor. I couldn't believe this article concept hadn't been taken yet, so I wrote it myself. I got an excellent review from Chiefjustice, and hopefully improved the article after almost a month of procrastination. Do you guys think it's ready for featuredom? - T.L.B. Image:Baloon.gif WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 01:24, Dec 2
  2. For. Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn! 02:33, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
  3. So... rad.... Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 07:42, Dec 2 2009
  4. Totally For and stuff, like whatever. ChiefjusticeDS 09:47, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
  5. For. They were soooo much cooler before the Southern Strategy. Now they're like your parents. Sir Modusoperandi Brute! Boinc! 09:53, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
  6. For. I didn't read it or anything, but it's by TLB so it probably doesn't suck too much. -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png CUN18:33, 2 Dec
  7. Obvious For. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 20:10, 2 December 2009
  8. For. 193.61.254.27 21:33, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
  9. For. Gee, I wish I could have thought of this...--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 15:41, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
  10. For. 98.221.153.215 21:29, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
  11. For. Tubolitionist, dude.     GlobalTourniquetUnAstrologer, film critic 21:43, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
  12. Radical. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 08:38, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
  13. For.--    00:55, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
  14. For. I don't find it too funny either, but what the fuck. Some do. In fact, it was funny in some ways. The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 10:50, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 3
  1. Against. To me it's modern slang thrown into the 1860s, and I don't find it funny.     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  20:07, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against. Too scattergun for a VFH. It's overstuffed with enough ides for at least three articles. RomArtus Imperator(talk) 13:32, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Against. Per above. MAHMOOSHA 2.022px-Flag_of_Egypt.png 18px-Foxicon.png 18:12, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
Comments

[vote]

Why?:Have an alienating music taste

Score: 7
Nomination: Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 05:33, 28 November 2009
For Votes: 9
  1. Nom+For. I just remembered Sycamore used to write quite a couple good articles, so I'll be nomming a few to fill up VFH a bit. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 05:33, 28 November 2009
  2. For. Sir Starnestommy Image:Icons-flag-us.png (TalkContribsCUN) 09:08, Nov. 29, 2009
  3. For. Chyel 01:24, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Ah go on then. It was pretty funny and a good concept. Weak for, I guess. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 12:01, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
  5. For. It's amazing how this article has retained its timelessness and become increasingly relevant in our world... Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 00:34, Dec 2 2009
  6. Weak For - Wasn't hilarious, but I'm sure other people will enjoy it more than me. -- Kip the DipTalkWorksTreat WHORE! 07:01, Dec. 5, 2009
  7. For. I remember this. I remember helping a little with this. I remember quite liking it at the time. I still quite like it. --UU - natter 13:33, Dec 10
  8. Very Weak For. Exactly per Kip teh Dip. MAHMOOSHA 2.022px-Flag_of_Egypt.png 18px-Foxicon.png 13:52, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
  9. For--Reverse Genocide Cockatrices 13:08, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2
  1. Against.. To me it reads like a list only with more description. The article doesn't seem to go anywhere.     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  07:35, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Meh. Not that I don't agree with most of this, but that doesn't really make it funny. -RAHB 05:57, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • Abstain. Per all the Weak Fors. Che 15px-SBQ3.JPG } 11:56,11December,2009

[vote]

UnBooks:The Stranger

Score: 8
Nomination: Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 05:27, 28 November 2009
For Votes: 8
  1. Nom+For. I just remembered Sycamore used to write quite a couple good articles, so I'll be nomming a few to fill up VFH a bit. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 05:27, 28 November 2009
  2. For. Sir Starnestommy Image:Icons-flag-us.png (TalkContribsCUN) 09:07, Nov. 29, 2009
  3. For. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 13:01, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Damn Good, and I laughed several times quite inappropriately. Most excellent!  –  FuhQ.gif ZDsig.gif Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN 04:54, 3 December 2009
  5. For. Extracting humour from a very unfunny situation is very good. RomArtus Imperator(talk) 15:34, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
  6. For. Best laughs here for some time ever. The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 17:25, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
  7. For. One of those there "good read" things that I like. --UU - natter 13:30, Dec 10
  8. For. It took me awhile to get into the 'meat' of this article, but it's really quite good. Nice and tender!  Steak.gifTALK  FRESH MEAT   talk to me 23:14 10 December 2009
Against Votes: 0

No against votes

Comments

[vote]

UnNews:Dunkirk debacle may extend war

Score: 10.5 times ze Jews looked at me funny
Nomination: ~Jewriken.GIF 12:14, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
For Votes: 14.5
  1. NF - a wee bit of history from Master Operandi. Read, children, and smarten up. You're all uneducated rednecks. ~Jewriken.GIF 12:14, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Ja. MAHMOOSHA 2.022px-Flag_of_Egypt.png 18px-Foxicon.png 12:28, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
  3. For the part of history they never tell you. And give a listen to Mordillo's amusing audio. Sir Modusoperandi Brute! Boinc! 16:15, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
  4. For. El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 10:24, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
  5. Yesh. Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 15:04, 11 November 2009
  6. For. I really liked it. ChiefjusticeDS 20:00, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
  7. For Can we change the top date from 2007 though? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! 05:42, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
  8. For. -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png CUN20:41, 14 Nov
  9. For. This is news indeed. The Image:oranssiviiva.jpg Rulebook 19:25, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
  10. For. Sir Starnestommy Image:Icons-flag-us.png (TalkContribsCUN) 08:58, Nov. 29, 2009
  11. For Sir Roger 05:19, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
  12. For. Reverse Genocide Cockatrices 11:38, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
  13. For. Finally got around to reading it properly (all the other times I was staring at it without taking anything in). --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 14:30, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
  14. For. 193.63.122.20 15:21, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
  15. For. Could you believe after all these months I've refrained from reading it because of the boring title? Anyway, I managed to muster a click on the link, and now its a for. ---Matfen815 22:39, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 4
  1. Against. Didn't find it funny.     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  21:46, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against. It's a decent article, but not FA worthy in my opinion. Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING DU F@H~} Wednesday, 18:34, Nov 11 2009
  3. Against. RomArtus Imperator(talk) 17:59, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Against.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   21:55, Sunday 15 November 2009  

See also

Awards, Decorations and Honours
Image:Awards2.gif Awards Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Awards · Ninjastars
Ranks &
Honours
Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the month
UnBooks Author of the Month · Potatochopper of the Month · Reviewer of the Month

Emmanuel Goldstein Award of Excellence in the Distribution of Misinformation · Foolitzer Prize
UnScripts Playwright of the Month · Article Narrator of the Month
Writer of the Year · Uncyclopedian of the Year · RadicalX of the Year
Admin Rank · RYA · User Space Affiliations · Past Winners


Limelight VFH · VFP · Best of · Top 10 of 2005 · Top 10 of 2006 · Top 10 of 2007 · Top 10 of 2008 · Hall of Shame · Rating System
Prix citron Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sockpuppeteer of the Month · FFS
Old VFH archives:

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14

Personal tools
projects