Uncyclopedia:VFH

1. You heard me. -OptyC Sucks! CUN03:55, 27 May

No against votes

• Somebody who is less rusty at wiki coding can add the nomination template to the article. /me looks in socky's direction. -OptyC Sucks! CUN03:55, 27 May

• Also I feel obliged to mention that the links in the quasi featured templates both point to a pre-colonization vfh nom. -OptyC Sucks! CUN04:00, 27 May

1. For. Funnybony  21:06, May 26
2. For. Mattsnow 00:39, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
3. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:42, 27 May 2012
4. For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:44, May 27, 2012 (UTC)

No against votes

Humm, I was thinking that if Wikileakes were run by us at Uncyclopedia then it would be a load of disinformation and balderdash meant to confuse and confound. It might be called UnWikiLeaks, and a report might read something like this UnNews.

1. Nom&4 PopGoesTheWeasel doesn't even know this is good. Ha! Just needs a couple of minor tweaks, but this page is a f-e-a-t-u-r-e in the universe I live in. Nice work, although it should be featured from mainspace. Aleister 19:12 26-5-'12
2. For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:41, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
3. For. Mattsnow 00:43, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
4. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:44, 27 May 2012
5. For. Now I will vote for ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:33, May 27, 2012 (UTC)

1. Namespace. If tis worth featuring, it must first be worth putting in the mainspace. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:44, 26 May

• I don't know what's in the last panel, I don't have flash on the laptop. What's on there? Aleister 19:31 26-5-'12
• Comment. I agree with Optimuschris, this should go to the mainspace before it is features. For this reason (although I found it hilarious) I am not voting for until it is mainspaced ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:52, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
• Guys, I've been told to mainspace it so I did. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 02:34, May 27, 2012 (UTC)

1. NM,4 This is a rewrite of a page that Boone's Farm public relations people had kept here for years, once in awhile editing it as IP's to keep the article "antiseptic". Why? Because it shows up very high in the search engines when 'Boone's Farm' is typed in. I and MrN eventually found it and played on it (MrN says it is my page, but he added quotes and inspired me!), and we've waited for the Boone's Farm guys to come back and moan about it. They did once, but were zapped like bugs meeting buggier bugs. Boone's Farm is not considered wine by many although they pretend to be wine (true). That's why they can't sell it in wine stores. Give me Mad Dog 20/20 any day. Aleister 19:00 24-5-'12
2. For. Funnybony  09:27, May 25
3. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:12, 25 May 2012
4. For. Great humour condensed into a fine punch. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:13, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
5. For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:20, May 27, 2012 (UTC)

No against votes

1. Nom and for. Another hilarious one by Weebils! Mattsnow 22:08, May 22, 2012 (UTC)
2. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:22, 22 May 2012
3. For. Weebils. Aleister 2:14 23-5-'12
4. For. Of course! Weebils (talk) 06:24, May 23, 2012 (UTC)
5. For. Very good Danhomer4
6. For. That was good, and it could almost be real considering the way Wal-Mart works lol RS (talk) 07:51, May 23, 2012 (UTC)
7. For. lol ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:53, May 23, 2012 (UTC)
8. For. Funnybony  08:45, May 23
9. For. -- Alpha Quintesson (talk) 00:56, May 24, 2012 (UTC)
10. For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:48, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

No against votes

No for votes

1. For. Now there is one. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:22, 22 May 2012
2. For. And then there were two. Aleister 2:10 23-5-'12
3. For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:47, May 23, 2012 (UTC)
4. For. After MrN added the history I'll vote For it--Funnybony  12:39, May 23

1. Against. It really tried but it felt like it tried too hard. RS (talk) 07:45, May 23, 2012 (UTC)

1. For This article will make your brain orgasm. --ShabiDOO 10:28, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
2. For. Hmmm ok. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:14, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
3. For. ShabiDOO Funnybony  14:45, May 21
4. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:33, 21 May 2012
5. For.--MamboCalamari (talk) 22:06, May 21, 2012 (UTC)MamboCalamari17:04, 21 May 2012</small>

1. Against. Not a feature as it is in my view RomArtus*Imperator« (Orate) 18:31, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
2. Against. Confucius say: Article is like writer in bed; short and dissapointing ¶ 21:59, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
3. Against. It's not very funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:02, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

   Guys could you please give some constructive criticism? "Not a feature", "dissapointing", "not funny" doesn't tell me anything. I cannot improve the article if all I read are negative adjectives that cannot be inteperated. --ShabiDOO 22:55, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

4. Against. Hide08 (talk) 23:46, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
5. Against. It needs to be expanded and reworked, I like the concept, I always thought a good joke was coming, but they are very few... Mattsnow 23:48, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
6. Against. Not sure why this is funny. Saying "me love you long time" over and over was wearing when it's a one shot joke IMO RS (talk) 07:40, May 23, 2012 (UTC)

• Comment. I can see what you are trying to do Shabidoo, Confucius as a Chinese huckster with a poor grasp of English but I think that is a bit too obvious in my view. RomArtus*Imperator« (Orate) 08:06, May 22, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the constructive criticism everyone. It's a lot like Being and Nothingness. Its the melding two ideas, its humour in its briefness and simplicity. I guess you either laugh your ass off or think WTF? Better someone take this nomination down. --ShabiDOO 18:01, May 23, 2012 (UTC)

1. I happened to come across this article and I liked what I saw. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:30, 21 May 2012
2. For. I also like this. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:08, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
3. In Soviet Russia article likes seeing you. Aleister 10:20 21-5-'12
4. For. Funnybony  14:50, May 21
5. For. 134.29.196.80 18:28, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
6. For. Pip pip, Bob's your uncle. ¶ 22:01, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
7. For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:49, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
8. For. RomArtus*Imperator« (Orate) 21:41, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

1. Against. RS (talk) 04:51, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

1. Ok, I know this won't fly because it isn't particularly funny and "in the style of" is about as played-out as making fun of emos. But I still like it, and goddamnit, but we need some highbrow stuff to be recognized. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, May 18 '12 21:22 (UTC)
2. For. Funnybony  08:14, May 19
3. for, i like it. --MasterWangs 10:36, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
4. For. Yeah...really good job ShabiDOO 01:24, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
5. For. HauntedUndies . 11:20, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
6. For. Highbrow indeed but a good article. GG • iTalk • iEdit 15:13, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
7. For. ☭ ♂ Matthlock ☯ ☃ € ☭ 20:37, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
8. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:25, 21 May 2012
9. For. Dry, but ok ¶ 22:05, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
10. For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:35, May 24, 2012 (UTC)
11. For. -- Alpha Quintesson (talk) 02:10, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

1. Against. RS (talk) 04:41, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

1. Nom and For. I laughed like hell, anyway. !!!~High_General_Aimsplode~!!!  (Der_Führerbunker ||| Wehrmacht Factories) 21:13, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
2. For. GG • iTalk • iEdit 21:21, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
3. For. ok ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:05, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
4. For. -- Alpha Quintesson (talk) 06:45, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
5. For. Funnybony  09:52, May 19
6. For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:18, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
7. For. HauntedUndies . 11:15, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
8. For. ☭ ♂ Matthlock ☯ ☃ € ☭ 21:03, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
9. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:25, 21 May 2012
10. For. Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes and more yes. ¶ 22:14, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
11. For. Mattsnow 23:18, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

1. Against, didn't laugh that much. Maybe its just me. --MasterWangs 10:41, May 19, 2012 (UTC)

   Maybe that spinning dildo at the end of your sig is just distracting you too much. >.> —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:25, 21 May 2012

2. Against. Not really that funny. RS (talk) 04:39, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
3. Against. Last paragraph spoils what could be a feature. RomArtus*Imperator« (Orate) 18:33, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

1. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.58.90.17 (talk • contribs)
2. Always liked this one. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:52, 16 May 2012
3. For. Sure why not.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, May 16 '12 0:59 (UTC)
4. For. 119.224.89.46 09:41, May 16, 2012 (UTC)
5. For. sure ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:50, May 16, 2012 (UTC)
6. For. !!!~High General Aimsplode~!!!  (This is where you piss me off. boom!! headshot....) 20:59, May 16, 2012 (UTC)
7. For. Hide08 (talk) 20:07, May 17, 2012 (UTC)
8. For. Hilarious! XD Mattsnow 21:02, May 17, 2012 (UTC)
9. For. 99.165.125.206 01:18, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
10. For. Could use a little polishing. but HELARIOUS ShabiDOO 02:18, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
11. For. -- Alpha Quintesson (talk) 03:10, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
12. For. 92.224.40.119 13:03, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
13. For. Perhaps it can be cleaned up before the front page Funnybony  09:54, May 19
14. For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:16, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
15. For. 69.171.164.230 23:04, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
16. For. Most certainly. ☭ ♂ Matthlock ☯ ☃ € ☭ 20:41, May 20, 2012 (UTC)

1. Against Needs a lot more work. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:03, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
2. Against. It could do with a tidy up and edit in my view. RomArtus*Imperator« (Orate) 15:15, May 19, 2012 (UTC)

• Comment. RS (talk) 00:11, May 16, 2012 (UTC)
• I've fixed it up. All you against voters should reconsider. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:16, May 19, 2012 (UTC)

  Heh, English people and their acronyms. Glad I saved it from VFD those 2 times it was nommed there. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:56, 20 May 2012

• Comment. It's still a mess in my view. RomArtus*Imperator« (Orate) 18:02, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
• Comment. Abstaining, it feels a bit too all over the place. There's some good stuff in here, it just feels like it needs to be fleshed out a bit. ¶ 22:07, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
• Comment For me it's too Michael Mcintyre. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:18, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

1. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:00, 15 May 2012
2. For. !!!~High General Aimsplode~!!!  (This is where you piss me off. boom!! headshot....) 21:01, May 16, 2012 (UTC)
3. For. Too true, and great satire. Comment below. Aleister 12:13 17-5-'12
4. For. Per Aleister Funnybony  12:27, May 17
5. For This article is pitched brilliantly. The unique angle used with the subject, coupled with great writing, make this one of the best pieces of satire I have seen anywhere recently. It is satirising the church's longstanding and continuing disgusting attitude toward child-abuse, not supporting the act. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:42, May 17, 2012 (UTC)
6. For. 89.204.190.37 15:05, May 17, 2012 (UTC)
7. For. Mattsnow 21:06, May 17, 2012 (UTC)
8. For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:50, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
9. For. ☭ ♂ Matthlock ☯ ☃ € ☭ 20:43, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
10. For. Sweet Potato (talk) 03:16, May 22, 2012 (UTC)

1. Against. I'm not sure why this is funny. RS (talk) 22:36, May 15, 2012 (UTC)
2. Against. I'll have to go with Shabidoo on this one. It's too disturbing, and shows the church in much to poor a light to be featured on the main page. Scofield & The Machine 06:37, May 17, 2012 (UTC)

• Comment. Im really sorry but this article creeps me out. It seems like it is more supporting boy rape than parodying it. While Im sure that this was not the aim of the article, thats how it appears to me at least. ShabiDOO 23:28, May 15, 2012 (UTC)
• That's the satire, and if it creeps you out, it did what satire is supposed to do! And for being "too disturbing, and shows the church in much to poor a light...", there is not too poor a light for what that cult did to thousands of boys over many decades (and that's not even going into the historical record - probably 1500 years of this was going on). Aleister 12:15 17-5-'12
• Comment. What does Ringo say in UnNews:Vatican forgiven by Beatles. It seem to me that this article is offering a cure, not inciting an already existing crime. It's a spoof on the meaning of the title. Since when did Uncyclopedia become religious? The only bad light on the church is their own history to date. Lighten up! Funnybony  12:43, May 17

Sorry guys, the "spoof" part doesn't come across to me. --ShabiDOO 22:01, May 17, 2012 (UTC)

• Comment. Added a new cartoonish picture with new caption --- to lighten it up more. Funnybony  09:17, May 18

1. N+F Hilarious! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:33, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
2. For. Gave it a read when patrolling it; twas awesome! GG • iTalk • iEdit 22:39, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
3. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:33, 14 May 2012
4. For. Mattsnow 02:28, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
5. For. 134.29.196.80 02:32, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
6. For. Weebils (talk) 05:13, May 15, 2012 (UTC) (No "expanding and polishing" need apply, however.)
7. For. nice ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:34, May 17, 2012 (UTC)
8. For. Per Frosty Funnybony  09:56, May 18
9. For. Per Frosty and Funnyboy ☭ ♂ Matthlock ☯ ☃ € ☭ 20:45, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
10. For. Funnybony  14:52, May 21
11. For. Sweet Potato (talk) 02:24, May 22, 2012 (UTC)
12. For. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 02:20, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

No against votes

• Comment. with a little expanding and polishing this will be great imho ShabiDOO 18:20, May 14, 2012 (UTC)

  I beg your pardon first lady :) --ShabiDOO 05:48, May 15, 2012 (UTC)

  Expanding and polishing. I just got that. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, May 18 '12 18:17 (UTC)

• Comment. I found parts funny. I won't vote either way though. RS (talk) 22:38, May 15, 2012 (UTC)
• Same here. Maybe I'm a little distracted, but I didn't laugh too much. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, May 16 '12 1:01 (UTC)

1. Well, let's see if they improve this? |Si Plebius Joe ang Kemador | GTC-ULLA IC Kill | 03:20, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
2. For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:46, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
3. For. Mattsnow 18:50, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
4. For. --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 20:11, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
5. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:31, 14 May 2012
6. For. I'm not actually for any of this, it's just because I could use a second featured article before I "DIE FUCKER DIE" *blows raspberry at BB*-Maniac1075^{Complain Here} 12:45, May 15, 2012 (UTC)
7. For. Hilarious, very well put together. I'd edit the spelling in a few spots though. RS (talk) 23:00, May 15, 2012 (UTC)
8. For. I'd edit the various spelling mistakes, but this was hilarious!!! 190.236.107.235 01:35, May 16, 2012 (UTC)
9. For. ☭ ♂ Matthlock ☯ ☃ € ☭ 20:48, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
10. For. GG • iTalk • iEdit 20:56, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
11. For. Yeah, ok ¶ 22:09, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
12. For. Nobody should go hungry, even if they are playing a game. Eat! Eat, drink, and be merry. Aleister 3:09 22-5-'12

1. I honestly don't think this is funny at all. Most of the humor is derived from either sex, being extremely crude for no good reason, or calling someone "Catshit" instead of Katniss. Being obscene does not necessarily equal being funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 12:55, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
2. Against. Seriously lacking in funny. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 06:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
3. Against. Sweet Potato (talk) 03:18, May 22, 2012 (UTC)
4. Against. Terribly unfunny. Needs to be entirely rewritten. EMC ^[TALK] 13:25 May 23 2012
5. Against. One, I happen to like the Hunger Games. Two, I do not like where this article is going.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 05:19, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
6. Against. per Roman Dog Bird. -OptyC Sucks! CUN05:24, 27 May

1. I don't want to read it because I want to see the movie and don't like spoilers. If a few people vote for it I'll vote For. because it's Maniac's page, and Maniac sees things other people miss and I'll know it's good. If Romartus votes for it, it's golden, as is Maniac. Aleister 13:00 13-5-'12
2. I don't want to read it because I don't want to see the movie and don't like spoilers. If a few people vote for it I'll vote Against. because I'm a snarky li'l bitch, and I hate Maniac to boot (I hate him I hate him I hate him DIE FUCKER DIE), and Maniac is a swell dude, but I couldn't think of any things to say about him that would be simultaneously complimentary and funny. If Romartus votes for it, I know it's long-winded and historical, as is Maniac. I guess. I never read his stuff. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, May 14 '12 22:35 (UTC)
3. Needs the crudeness toned down and the spelling fixed. HauntedUndies . 10:40, May 17, 2012 (UTC)

• Abstain. Let down in my view with some of the names used for the characters. Perhaps a couple of edits shy of being featured. RomArtus*Imperator« (Orate) 13:16, May 23, 2012 (UTC)

1. Nom + For This should have been featured last time, it got no where because nobody voted, I don't expect great things this time around from our voters either, but what the hell. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:32, May 12, 2012 (UTC)
2. For. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 13:08, May 12, 2012 (UTC)
3. For. Per Frosty Funnybony  13:15, May 12
4. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:52, 12 May 2012
5. For. Scary but true. Aleister 13:18 13-5-'12
6. For. 134.29.196.80 02:57, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
7. For. Yahsurewhatever !!!~High General Aimsplode~!!!  (This is where you piss me off. boom!! headshot....) 15:25, May 17, 2012 (UTC)
8. For. Good stuff. ☭ ♂ Matthlock ☯ ☃ € ☭ 20:50, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
9. For. 66.18.247.110 01:44, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
10. For. Lost it at Mavis Beacon ¶ 22:12, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
11. For. Sweet Potato (talk) 02:31, May 22, 2012 (UTC)
12. For. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 12:05, May 23, 2012 (UTC)
13. A weakish for. This contains some good stuff, but needs some work dealing with things that are just too cliche. But it did get laughs out of me so I will vote for and proceed to go back to drinking. --MasterWangs 07:18, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

1. Against. Needs comedy, most of this is overblown items that have always been said about Video Games. RS (talk) 23:06, May 15, 2012 (UTC)
2. Against. Too patchy Nikau (talk) 13:02, May 22, 2012 (UTC)

• Comment. there are some funny moments but i dont get some parts of the article, its a little confusing for me at times ShabiDOO 18:23, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
• Mehhhh...has some issues. Also, the comic at the end is basically a repetition of the hung-man caption, and I'm biased against "made" images which come from sources other than Uncyclopedia. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, May 14 '12 23:24 (UTC)

1. Nom & For. This was a Pee Buddy runner-up so should be ready for VFH. I'll fix it up a little first, though. -- This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 00:18, May 12, 2012 (UTC)
2. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:10, 12 May 2012
3. For. Reference of Pazuzu lol RS (talk) 23:09, May 15, 2012 (UTC)
4. For. Definite for. !!!~High General Aimsplode~!!!  (This is where you piss me off. boom!! headshot....) 15:29, May 17, 2012 (UTC)
5. For. Hilarious! -- the dorky contralto 11:29, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
6. For. ☭ ♂ Matthlock ☯ ☃ € ☭ 20:54, May 20, 2012 (UTC)

1. Against. 134.29.196.80 03:07, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
2. Against. Sweet Potato (talk) 03:07, May 22, 2012 (UTC)

• Abstain. needs expandification imo, but I'll be kind and abstain. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:08, May 12, 2012 (UTC)

1. Nom and for Mattsnow 04:31, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
2. For. Funnybony  04:57, May 11
3. For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:24, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
4. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:32, 11 May 2012
5. For. --EMC ^[TALK] 01:06 May 12 2012
6. For. GG • iTalk • iEdit 15:57, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
7. For. 80.96.202.126 15:18, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
8. For. ☭ ♂ Matthlock ☯ ☃ € ☭ 20:52, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
9. For. 18.189.117.52 16:46, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
10. For. It's what's expected, sure, but that's fine ¶ 22:13, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
11. For. MamboCalamari (talk) 22:31, May 21, 2012 (UTC)MamboCalamari MamboCalamari (talk) 22:31, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
12. For. Sweet Potato (talk) 03:26, May 22, 2012 (UTC)

1. Against. It needs a bit more (but appearing to be a lot less) to get the green light as a feature in my view. Sorry. RomArtus*Imperator« (Orate) 13:53, May 14, 2012 (UTC)

• This is good but suffers on account of its uneven naration. One minute it's too apathetic to be bothered describing shit, the next, it's going into full detail. HauntedUndies . 15:21, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
• Abstain. The formatting needs work since the images look like they were just thrown randomly at the page. Why not say that the author is too apathetic to place them properly? That plus the issue HauntedUndies identifies makes me unwilling to vote for at the moment. A bit more polish needed. ChiefjusticePS3 11:46, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
• Comment. Agree with HauntedUndies. Would be an easy For if it were consistently apathetic. - I'm Not Funny 16:03, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
• Comment. what chief said ShabiDOO 18:37, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
• Comment. Abstain It's got the spirit, but not the style. RS (talk) 23:19, May 15, 2012 (UTC)

1. Nom and for because everything in this article is completely true. --ShabiDOO 22:09, May 9, 2012 (UTC)
2. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:37, 9 May 2012
3. For. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 03:26, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
4. For. Mattsnow 03:50, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
5. For. Funnybony  08:59, May 10
6. For. Aleister 11:27 10-5
7. For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:26, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
8. For. 134.29.196.80 02:42, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
9. For. The truth RS (talk) 23:25, May 15, 2012 (UTC)
10. For. ☭ ♂ Matthlock ☯ ☃ € ☭ 21:06, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
11. For. Sweet Potato (talk) 02:36, May 22, 2012 (UTC)

No against votes

• Comment. I trust none of the yes voters are sending this as 'must read' link to their current partners..RomArtus*Imperator« (Orate) 13:55, May 14, 2012 (UTC)

1. Nom and for By EpicAwesomeness, who finished 2nd in the Pee Buddy contest! Mattsnow 01:49, May 9, 2012 (UTC)
2. For. User writes UnNews, somebody votes Funnybony  10:25, May 9
3. For. GG • iTalk • iEdit 11:20, May 9, 2012 (UTC)
4. For. Because I am a vain, selfish cunt. Talk! Contribs! 15:33, May 9, 2012 (UTC)
5. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:37, 9 May 2012
6. Iz good This signature has been kaputted by odor of the fecking cabal. HATERZ GONNA HATE ASK ME ABOUT MY HUGE, MUTILATED PENIS 20:44, May 9, 2012 (UTC)
7. For. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 03:53, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
8. For. HauntedUndies . 09:53, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
9. For. Nicely done. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:39, May 17, 2012 (UTC)
10. For. -- Alpha Quintesson (talk) 05:22, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
11. For. ☭ ♂ Matthlock ☯ ☃ € ☭ 21:10, May 20, 2012 (UTC)

1. Against. I didn't find it very funny, sorry. --EMC ^[TALK] 01:07 May 12 2012
2. Against. RS (talk) 23:28, May 15, 2012 (UTC)
3. Against. Sweet Potato (talk) 03:21, May 22, 2012 (UTC)

• Comment. I would happily vote for this if it was modified into a mainspace article :) ShabiDOO 22:16, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

  Err... screw that. I have ample food supplies on the couch and refuse to get up. Talk! Contribs! 16:27, May 10, 2012 (UTC)

1. Nom and for. By XDshempXD! Mattsnow 11:45, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
2. The Tango! The King of the Tango has a nice hat! As XDshempXD points out, he was once on top of the world, ma, and now can be revived on Uncy. Aleister 12:57 30-4-'12
3. For. Funnybony  12:27, Apr 30
4. For. OK, it's a bit of a vanity, voting for my own article. But it's okay! hehehehehehe -- the dorky contralto 20:46, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
5. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:09, 1 May 2012
6. For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:51, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
7. For. GEORGIEGIBBONS (talk) 18:38, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
8. Good workz This signature has been kaputted by odor of the fecking cabal. HATERZ GONNA HATE ASK ME ABOUT MY HUGE, MUTILATED PENIS 18:55, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
9. For. ☭ ♂ Matthlock ☯ ☃ € ☭ 21:26, May 20, 2012 (UTC)

1. Against. Knowledge of the subject would help, and the wiki link isn't much help either. There is good core to this article but perhaps it needed to be broadened out a bit for people unfamiliar with the subject matter. RomArtus*Imperator« (Orate) 18:20, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
2. Against. I shouldn't have to read a Wiki article first to understand the sarcasm... in my humble opinion. RS (talk) 23:47, May 15, 2012 (UTC)

1. SN+F Just nomming some stuff. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:25, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
2. For. Mattsnow 12:52, April 25, 2012 (UTC)
3. For. Yes yes yes. Killer! ShabiDOO 17:45, April 25, 2012 (UTC)
4. Happy Monkey! Liked it then, and now, and later too. Aleister 00:48 26-4-'12
5. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:29, 26 April 2012
6. For.--Funnybony  13:08, Apr 27
7. For. Good ideas displayed here and an annoying author pointing a reader to all the extras and sequels you could enjoy is a very clever device. A feature. RomArtus*Imperator« (Orate) 22:48, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
8. For dat --This signature has been kaputted by odor of the fecking cabal. HATERZ GONNA HATE ASK ME ABOUT MY HUGE, MUTILATED PENIS 12:35, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
9. For. ☭ ♂ Matthlock ☯ ☃ € ☭ 21:26, May 20, 2012 (UTC)

No against votes

• Comment. I don't find this funny but I know what it's like to have criticism lobbed my way. RS (talk) 23:51, May 15, 2012 (UTC)

• That is a fair enough comment. You can state that in the 'no' camp without fear of retribution, retaliation or ostracism..or is that 'Ostrichism'? --RomArtus*Imperator« (Orate) 06:54, May 24, 2012 (UTC)

• Not finding an article funny is not necesarily a reason to vote no. Not thinking or not wanting it to be featured, is in my view, a far more valid reason. I think very few people would hold it against you if you voted against on VFH, especially if its constructive criticism. --ShabiDOO 18:27, May 24, 2012 (UTC)