This article is neither pointless nor is this article being without a point, because there is no point. That is not to say it is without a point. On the contrary, this article (which is not an article) is the very point that you don't understand. But now we are mixing points. And this is not an article.


This is Not a Heading Edit

If you continue to read this article nerves will be strained. Unambiguously...are we answering the unanswerable?

If That was Not a Heading, What is This? Edit

Must we live our lives according to what isn't? If not...then what? WHAT?

We know WHO IS? We know it is you. Not the U symbolic, but you pronominal. But lets not be absurd. Lets not label our own labels.


But wait, now our questions are endless. Endless and endable. Alluring yet repulsating.

It is evident and clearly un-obvious.

 ? !!! Edit

“This is not a sentence in the sense of a category. This is an unfounded exclamation!”
~ Lollipop on the emptiness of quotes.

Quotes never realise their intercontextualityEdit don't quote what history is without.

Below there is not an image Edit


Below there are not graphic representations Edit






What you will Find Below is Most Certainly Not Text Edit

Please be aware that this is not text.

Ce N'est Pas Un Magritte Edit

MagrittePipe self referential

This is not a pipe. Or no?

Magritte didn't not paint paintings. But he did...did he not? That's rather something.

This is Not Another Heading Edit

How right. It isn't. How naive!


A deeper understanding of the non subconscious or death.

Fish Edit

There are no fish.

This is Not the End Edit

  • This is not a list.
    • This is also not a list.
      • This is not a list either.

These are not two uncatagorisable miscellany Edit




Nutritional Facts Edit



Trans fat-0




This article is not sweetened with aspartame.

This article contains cholesterol. [1]

we cannot reference the unreferenseable Edit

  1. Not even this.
Fries Quasi-Featured Article (1 April 2014)
This article was nominated to become a featured article; however, due to several votes being devoured by a cheap imitation of Led Zepplin, it didn't make the cut (7/4). Don't let this happen again! For just pennies a day, you can prevent another travesty of this nature, or vote for other articles at Uncyclopedia:VFH.