Template talk:Vfh health

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 2: Line 2:
   
 
Not to complain, but since we are going back to one article a day, should we consider keeping the health at 100% for only 2 days instead of 3? Keeping the health at 100% too long runs the risk of a flood of new articles booting high score older articles. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig2}} 17:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 
Not to complain, but since we are going back to one article a day, should we consider keeping the health at 100% for only 2 days instead of 3? Keeping the health at 100% too long runs the risk of a flood of new articles booting high score older articles. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig2}} 17:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  +
  +
will swine flu affect the health of VFH articles? {{User:Gerrycheevers/sig}} 18:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:27, April 29, 2009

This is hot. goshzillacorrespondence 18:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Not to complain, but since we are going back to one article a day, should we consider keeping the health at 100% for only 2 days instead of 3? Keeping the health at 100% too long runs the risk of a flood of new articles booting high score older articles. --Mnbvcxz 17:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

will swine flu affect the health of VFH articles? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects