Template talk:Stub

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This template doesn't always show up properly if there's an image off to the side. Could someone with editorial access modify the table code to fix this? --Algorithm 19:27, 22 Mar 2005 (EST)

I just tested it in Internet Explorer and it shows up fine, so apparently it's only a problem in Mozilla-based browsers. Nonetheless, this issue should be dealt with. --Algorithm 04:42, 23 Mar 2005 (EST)
I realized this too, I finally figured out how to fix it though. --Paulgb Talk 17:43, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Someone should change the word "expand" to something less serious. It makes pages look important :( --Phroziac 17:57, 3 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Request:

This article is a stub. The article submitter is a hack.

be changed to

This article is a stub. The article submitter is a hack.

edit spelling correction

Change from

you can help uncyclopedia by expanding it

to

you can help uncyclopedia by exploding it

edit We ought to unprotect this

I'm sick of seeing the same things over and over, it'd be nice if people could add more to it. Perhaps once we get upgraded to the latest MediaWiki version, we could semiprotect it. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 23:59, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)

edit What kind of suggested addition is this?

Kindofcrap
What kind of article is this? It's kind of crap! Let's improvement Uncyclopedia gives us much pleasure in the way. Do it here! Do it now!

Seahen 03:26, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)


It is an addition of several great happinesses. I assume you don't mind my HTML fix. In fact, I went ahead and made it its own stub type, Template:StubEngrish. (I hope you won't fault some minor changes.)—Lenoxus 20:03, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

edit Category

Shouldn't this be in Category:Stub templates? --62.255.32.11 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups), 03:30, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

||
||
||style="width:67px;"|
|- |class="miral"| |style="padding:14px 0 8px 0; background:#eee; width:50px;"|
[[File:Bloink1 solid.png|30px|link=|]]
| style="padding:8px 0 6px 0; background:#eee; "|'''This article needs to be expanded.'''
{{{1}}}[http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Template_talk:Stub?action=edit {{{2}}}]{{{3}}}
|class="mirar"| |- |style="width:67px;"|
||
||
||style="width:67px;"|
|- |}[[Category:Articles to be expanded]][[Category:Articles to fix (hidden)]][[Category:Stub]] template"">edit
"Pages with this template are added to Category:Stub via the {{Allstubs}} template"

But they're not. because of the <choose><option></option></choose> the category is left out. If it wasn't, then by including the allstubs template on this template would also place this in stub. So perhaps an admin could manually add the category in? ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 08:00, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

edit Oh my god

Do people take this seriously? Unclycopedia sucks. It is the worst thing ever. It's crap.

ADD TO PROJECT:PRAISE!!! ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

edit Idea for extension of "crack" variant

Proposal: Extending the variant This article is a stub. The article submitter may also have been smoking crack. You can help Uncyclopedia by expanding it. to include (and end with) the sentence The submitter, meanwhile, is probably beyond help.Lenoxus 07:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

edit Geez, Japaneese has superior template

ja:Template:スタブ (みさくらなんこつ) May convince more guy to finish the article! Ace Attacker 06:45, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

edit Unprotection of Stub

Oh, c'mon, you know you want to see what things people would come up with for the stub to say.--Hammerthingys42 19:59, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Views
Personal tools
Navigation
Community
Participate
Toolbox
projects