From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Oops, I was testing something. Revert, revert!17:37, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed :D 17:39, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- It is. I do.
- That's interesting. I'm guessing you must have a pretty old version of Firefox then. (Still, better than IE though.) 00:03, May 23, 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, but your link suggests that I might not need
-moz. I was running 3.5 for a long time and that may be when I got into this habit. Still, other readers might still be running older Firefoxes, and it is no major skin off our nose to give them a good show. 00:21 23-May-15
- Indeed, I no longer need the crutch, though your link suggests I will see baffling transition incompatibilities.
- Firefox have some odd CSS3 transition issues around the v3.4 and v3.5 mark. Some things supported by earlier versions aren't supported by later versions. The reality is it would be a small minority that would require the fail-safe back-coding, but the point of fail-safe back-coding is that it's fail-safe. Its inclusion doesn't impact on latter browsers, but its exclusion may impact earlier versions. So in short, we probably don't have a major need for it, but it's not going to hurt. • Puppy's talk page • 05:26 am 23 May 2015