Template talk:Australia

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (comment: revert to Fosters)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
==Categories==
  +
OK, so you don't want hundreds of articles in a category? What about [[:Category:Oscar_Wildeizms|this]] for example? I actually think uncyc on the whole ''under-uses'' categories, and all categories should have lots of (relevant (or hilariously irrelevant (as taste and common law permit))) pages. Maybe what is needed is sub-categories, like [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Political_geography this page on that loser nerd site]? --{{User:Bass hound/sig}} 16:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  +
  +
==Someone else==
 
what was wrong with the fosters for the links? That's a good joke and compares well to the other country templates eg {{Canada}}
 
what was wrong with the fosters for the links? That's a good joke and compares well to the other country templates eg {{Canada}}

Latest revision as of 16:17, October 16, 2006

edit Categories

OK, so you don't want hundreds of articles in a category? What about this for example? I actually think uncyc on the whole under-uses categories, and all categories should have lots of (relevant (or hilariously irrelevant (as taste and common law permit))) pages. Maybe what is needed is sub-categories, like this page on that loser nerd site? --Bh (talk) 16:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

edit Someone else

what was wrong with the fosters for the links? That's a good joke and compares well to the other country templates eg
Personal tools
projects