m (comment: revert to Fosters) |
Bass hound (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Categories== |
||
| + | OK, so you don't want hundreds of articles in a category? What about [[:Category:Oscar_Wildeizms|this]] for example? I actually think uncyc on the whole ''under-uses'' categories, and all categories should have lots of (relevant (or hilariously irrelevant (as taste and common law permit))) pages. Maybe what is needed is sub-categories, like [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Political_geography this page on that loser nerd site]? --{{User:Bass hound/sig}} 16:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ==Someone else== |
||
what was wrong with the fosters for the links? That's a good joke and compares well to the other country templates eg {{Canada}} |
what was wrong with the fosters for the links? That's a good joke and compares well to the other country templates eg {{Canada}} |
||
OK, so you don't want hundreds of articles in a category? What about this for example? I actually think uncyc on the whole under-uses categories, and all categories should have lots of (relevant (or hilariously irrelevant (as taste and common law permit))) pages. Maybe what is needed is sub-categories, like this page on that loser nerd site? --Bh (talk) 16:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
