This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the World War II: The Movie article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.

Article policies
Bloink1 solid
This article was nominated for deletion on March 31, 2012.
The result of the discussion was Keep.

Is it the same person writing all these articles because all I see is 'hide behind the English channel'...? Someones got a gripe against England/Britain and instead of being funny, they're being boring. Be funny please, make witty comments not the same old horse shit that we've heard 300000 times in the past.

i think its offensive to say the holocaust is fistuion my parents were holocsauast survivers

Dude, this is Uncyclopedia. Nobody cares.

Yeah, I mean that sad, but this is funny

Holoc... sause? CP\M 21:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

WOW KOOL HITLER = WIN ~zeldafan500, the god of the internet WTF why did someone get rid of the quotes at teh top of the page, put them back!

What do you mean hid behind the English Channel? You lot hid behind the whole flippin' Atlantic Ocean! Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:36, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

Movie or War?Edit

Put your votes & reasoning here... # for War, ## for Movie.

  1. This would be funnier just sticking to the main idea of what it was so that we don't confuse future editors. --  Le Cejak <-> 20:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

What was with the revert? Elassint Throw things at me 01:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

You changed something unfunny and biased to something unfunny and biased in a different direction. Try attacking both sides at once, it's more fun. -- Paw_print.jpg 02:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Rewrite Edit

I'm rewriting this thing, while still keeping the original movie idea. -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 04:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

You seem to have disappaered, so may I assume you're not going to rewrite it? What am I doing here? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

needs moar sensitivity, and much, much less racismEdit

The Result section and the intro treat the irradiation of Japan as flippant and justified for the sole reason of hatred of the Japanese. This and the World War 1 need a dark-humour war-is-hell rewrite. I'd do it but no time and it's a huge project.

old image Edit

lol i dont like this image of world war II, like star wars and stuff, where is the old one, that shows hitler and other guys in a game and and all?

Bad Grammar is Bad Edit

Seriously, the grammar, and paragraphing in this sucks. Ever heard the saying: A paragraph is like a woman's skirt, long enough to cover the vitals, but short enough to be interesting. These paragraphs are like a muslim woman's cloak, boring as hell. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mooninite4ever (talk • contribs)

Are you serious? Why don't you fix it then, instead of complaining about it? —Pelozurian (talk) 03:15, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Pictures Edit

^^ .... The sovjet troops prepare for assault is just grea .... XD XD XD XD

{{User:Anton199/Template:Article}} Anton (talk) 18:08, May 29, 2013 (UTC)