Talk:William Faulkner

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Lol, this matches the sound and the fury quite well, something that I am attempting to tackle ( for school though! fuck oprah!)68.160.226.6 00:53, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

True, this does show a conglomeration of SOC writing, but that's not all Faulkner was known for. --Judgement 04:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

edit From Pee Review

The comedy might be a bit too specifically stylized, seeing as it's a style joke. I could be wrong. As always, be brutal - I'm a big boy. :D --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 06:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 7 Not hilarious; doesn't need to be.
Concept: 9 It just works. I'm not sure why.
Prose and formatting: 10 Faulkner himself would be proud
Images: 4 Not a significant part of the article
Miscellaneous: 10 Substitute elegance
Final Score: 40 I love it, but I suspect a lot of people won't. Maybe if the later sections were a little more biographical and a bit less zany it would have a wider appeal.
Reviewer: --Kelpan 21:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


So apparently this went from being 90% Sound and the Fury to 90% As I Lay Dying. What gives? Cryst 00:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects